Topic: Assembling The Test
Student Name: Latif Qureshi
Class: M.Ed
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Assembling The Test
Student Name: Naeema Fareed
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Test Assembling (writing and constructing)Tasneem Ahmad
The document provides guidelines for assembling and constructing different types of test items, including multiple choice, true/false, matching, fill-in-the-blank, and essay questions. It discusses arranging items in order of difficulty and by similar format. The guidelines recommend writing clear stems and response options that avoid tricks and irrelevant clues. The document also includes a checklist for assembling the final test to ensure a consistent and fair evaluation of students.
This document provides guidance on constructing effective test items. It outlines a 4-step process:
1. Planning - Determine content, objectives, item types, and create a blueprint.
2. Preparing - Write items according to the blueprint. Prepare directions, administration instructions, scoring keys, and an analysis chart.
3. Try-out - Administer a preliminary and final tryout on samples to identify flaws and determine item statistics.
4. Evaluation - Analyze items based on difficulty, discrimination, consistency. Determine validity, reliability, and usability of the final test.
Lesson 3 developing a teacher made testCarlo Magno
This document provides guidance on developing teacher-made tests. It begins with an advance organizer and outlines the test development process. It then provides details on designing different item types, including selected-response, constructed-response, and interpretive exercise items. It gives guidelines for writing different item types and examples. The objectives are to explain assessment concepts and design aligned tests. It also discusses test specifications, characteristics, layout, instructions and scoring.
This chapter discusses objective test items, which are items with a single correct response. It covers the general characteristics and guidelines for writing different types of objective test items, including multiple choice, matching, and true/false items. It also discusses item analysis, which is the process of analyzing statistical characteristics of each item on a test to determine if items should be retained or discarded. Key aspects covered include item difficulty, item discrimination, distractor analysis, and test reliability. The document provides detailed guidelines for writing different types of objective test items and how to conduct item analysis following test administration.
Norm referenced and Criterion Referenced TestDrSindhuAlmas
The document discusses criterion-referenced tests (CRT) and norm-referenced tests (NRT). CRTs measure student performance against a predetermined standard or criteria, such as achieving a certain score. NRTs compare student performance to other students in a norming group. CRTs are used to assess student mastery of specific standards and guide instruction, while NRTs rank students and are used for grouping, admissions, and identifying learning disabilities. The key difference is that CRTs measure performance against a fixed standard, while NRTs measure performance relative to other students.
This document discusses the key characteristics of a good measuring instrument or test, including validity, reliability, objectivity, norms, and usability. It defines validity as the accuracy with which a test measures what it claims to measure, and describes different types of validity including content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. Reliability is defined as the consistency of measurement and different methods for estimating reliability are outlined. Objectivity refers to eliminating personal bias from scoring. Norms provide average scores for comparison. Usability factors like ease of administration, timing, cost, and scoring are also addressed.
Types of test items and principles for constructing test items rkbioraj24
Types of test items and principles for constructing test items discusses various types of test items including oral tests, essay tests, short answer questions, and objective tests. It also outlines principles for constructing good test items such as ensuring validity, reliability, objectivity, comprehensiveness, and clarity. A good test should measure what it intends to measure, function consistently, yield objective scores, cover the entire syllabus, and have clear directions.
Topic: Assembling The Test
Student Name: Naeema Fareed
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Test Assembling (writing and constructing)Tasneem Ahmad
The document provides guidelines for assembling and constructing different types of test items, including multiple choice, true/false, matching, fill-in-the-blank, and essay questions. It discusses arranging items in order of difficulty and by similar format. The guidelines recommend writing clear stems and response options that avoid tricks and irrelevant clues. The document also includes a checklist for assembling the final test to ensure a consistent and fair evaluation of students.
This document provides guidance on constructing effective test items. It outlines a 4-step process:
1. Planning - Determine content, objectives, item types, and create a blueprint.
2. Preparing - Write items according to the blueprint. Prepare directions, administration instructions, scoring keys, and an analysis chart.
3. Try-out - Administer a preliminary and final tryout on samples to identify flaws and determine item statistics.
4. Evaluation - Analyze items based on difficulty, discrimination, consistency. Determine validity, reliability, and usability of the final test.
Lesson 3 developing a teacher made testCarlo Magno
This document provides guidance on developing teacher-made tests. It begins with an advance organizer and outlines the test development process. It then provides details on designing different item types, including selected-response, constructed-response, and interpretive exercise items. It gives guidelines for writing different item types and examples. The objectives are to explain assessment concepts and design aligned tests. It also discusses test specifications, characteristics, layout, instructions and scoring.
This chapter discusses objective test items, which are items with a single correct response. It covers the general characteristics and guidelines for writing different types of objective test items, including multiple choice, matching, and true/false items. It also discusses item analysis, which is the process of analyzing statistical characteristics of each item on a test to determine if items should be retained or discarded. Key aspects covered include item difficulty, item discrimination, distractor analysis, and test reliability. The document provides detailed guidelines for writing different types of objective test items and how to conduct item analysis following test administration.
Norm referenced and Criterion Referenced TestDrSindhuAlmas
The document discusses criterion-referenced tests (CRT) and norm-referenced tests (NRT). CRTs measure student performance against a predetermined standard or criteria, such as achieving a certain score. NRTs compare student performance to other students in a norming group. CRTs are used to assess student mastery of specific standards and guide instruction, while NRTs rank students and are used for grouping, admissions, and identifying learning disabilities. The key difference is that CRTs measure performance against a fixed standard, while NRTs measure performance relative to other students.
This document discusses the key characteristics of a good measuring instrument or test, including validity, reliability, objectivity, norms, and usability. It defines validity as the accuracy with which a test measures what it claims to measure, and describes different types of validity including content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. Reliability is defined as the consistency of measurement and different methods for estimating reliability are outlined. Objectivity refers to eliminating personal bias from scoring. Norms provide average scores for comparison. Usability factors like ease of administration, timing, cost, and scoring are also addressed.
Types of test items and principles for constructing test items rkbioraj24
Types of test items and principles for constructing test items discusses various types of test items including oral tests, essay tests, short answer questions, and objective tests. It also outlines principles for constructing good test items such as ensuring validity, reliability, objectivity, comprehensiveness, and clarity. A good test should measure what it intends to measure, function consistently, yield objective scores, cover the entire syllabus, and have clear directions.
The document discusses eliminating irrelevant barriers and unintended clues in objective test items that can undermine the validity of an assessment. Factors like complex sentences, difficult vocabulary, and unclear instructions are construct-irrelevant barriers that limit students' responses. Test items should measure the intended learning outcomes and not other irrelevant abilities. Care should be taken to avoid ambiguity, wordiness, biases and other barriers that prevent students from demonstrating their actual achievement levels. Clues within items could allow students without sufficient learning to still answer correctly, preventing the items from functioning as intended.
Classroom tests and assessments play a central role in student learning by identifying students' prior knowledge, weaknesses, and strengths to help set learning goals and motivate learning. Effective classroom tests are valid, reliable, and fair, and they provide timely feedback to both students and teachers to check instructional effectiveness, provide learning opportunities, and assess teaching strategy effectiveness.
This document discusses different types of assessment used in education including objective, short answer, and essay questions. Objective questions have one correct answer and include multiple choice, true/false, and matching. They allow for quick scoring but allow guessing. Short answer questions require a word or few sentences response and can measure simple learning outcomes. Essay questions require longer written answers and allow freedom of expression but are more time consuming to score. The document provides examples and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each type.
A good test should have the following key characteristics:
1. It should be a valid instrument that accurately measures what it is intended to measure as evidenced by various types of validity like content validity.
2. It should be a reliable instrument that consistently measures constructs and yields similar results over time as determined through methods like test-retest reliability.
3. It should be objective by eliminating personal bias and opinions of scorers so that different scorers arrive at the same score.
It discuss about what is test and types of test items. Types of items - 1. Objective types a) A) True – false items (Alternate response type B) b) Multiple choice Test Items (Changing Alternative type) C) c) Matching Type Test Item D) d) Simple Recall Type Test Items E) e) Completion Type Test Item 2) Short answer 3) Details answer. It also discuss about advantages and disadvantages of objective type, short answer and details answer.
The document outlines 9 stages of test construction: 1) Planning, 2) Preparing items, 3) Establishing validity, 4) Reliability, 5) Arranging items, 6) Writing directions, 7) Analyzing and revising, 8) Reproducing, and 9) Administering and scoring. It discusses key considerations at each stage such as writing items according to specifications, establishing content and criterion validity, determining reliability through various methods, and ensuring the test is objective, comprehensive, simple, and practical. The final stages cover arranging items by difficulty, providing clear directions, analyzing item performance, and properly administering the test.
Standardized tests are designed to have consistent objectives and criteria across different forms of the test. They measure students' mastery of prescribed grade-level competencies. Developing a standardized test involves determining its purpose, designing test specifications, creating and selecting test items, evaluating items, specifying scoring procedures, and ongoing validation studies. The document outlines these steps and provides examples of standardized language proficiency tests like TOEFL and IELTS.
The document discusses aims, goals, and objectives in curriculum development. It defines aims as the most general level of educational outcomes, goals as reflecting purpose with outcomes in mind, and objectives as the most specific levels. Aims provide direction to educational action and inspire an ideal vision. Goals are statements of intent to be accomplished and have some outcomes in mind. Objectives delineate expected changes in students and intended behaviors. The document also outlines examples of aims, goals, and objectives for different levels of education.
Topic: Subjective and Objective Test
Student Name: Jeejal Samo
Class: B.Ed. Hons Elementary Part (II)
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Administration/Conducting the Test
Student Name: Waqar Hassan
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Qualities of a Good Test
Student Name: Amna Mishal
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
teacher made test Vs standardized testathiranandan
Standardized tests are more rigorous and scientifically developed than teacher-made tests. They require a panel of experts including content specialists, test designers, and teachers to plan the test, write items, test the items, and establish validity and reliability through field testing and statistical analysis. The process ensures the tests accurately measure what they aim to without bias. Teacher-made tests are simpler to create by individual teachers and better tied to local classroom needs, but are not as reliable or valid as standardized tests due to less rigorous development and analysis. Both have advantages for different assessment purposes.
SCORING AND MARKING KEY, QUESTION WISE ANALYSIS OF ACHIEVEMENT TESTrkbioraj24
Achievement test is an important tool in school evaluation and has great significance in measuring instructional progress and progress of the students in the subject area.
Accurate achievement data are very important for planning curriculum and instruction and for program evaluation
This document discusses essay tests as an assessment method. It defines essay tests as those requiring extended written responses. It describes the key features and types of essay questions, including extended and restricted response questions. The document outlines the advantages and disadvantages of essay tests, and provides suggestions for developing, administering, scoring and evaluating essay tests effectively.
1. The document outlines the process of test construction which involves preliminary considerations, reviewing the content domain, item/task writing, assessing content validity, revising items/tasks, field testing, revising based on field testing results, test assembly, selecting performance standards, pilot testing, and preparing manuals.
2. Key steps include specifying test purposes and intended examinees, reviewing content standards/objectives, drafting and editing items/tasks, evaluating items for validity and potential biases, conducting item analysis after field testing, revising or deleting weak items, assembling the final test, and collecting ongoing reliability and validity data.
3. Item analysis involves both qualitative review of item content and format as well as quantitative analysis
This document discusses different types of tests used to assess students. It describes objective tests which can be scored reliably, including multiple choice questions, true/false, matching, and short answer items. Objective tests are easy to construct and score but encourage memorization. Subjective tests like essays allow more flexible answers but are harder to score reliably. Other tests discussed include proficiency, placement, achievement, aptitude, admission, progress and language dominance tests, each with a specific purpose in assessing students.
This document discusses achievement tests, which measure how much a student has learned in a particular subject area. Achievement tests are formal assessments designed to evaluate a student's knowledge and mastery of specific topics. The document outlines important characteristics of effective achievement tests, such as reliability, validity, objectivity, specificity, and ease of administration. Achievement tests can be used to evaluate students' strengths and weaknesses, inform teaching, and determine promotion to the next grade level.
1) The document outlines the steps involved in developing a new test, including defining the test purpose and audience, developing a test plan, writing test items, and specifying administration instructions.
2) Key steps include composing items in various formats like multiple choice, true/false, essays, and developing scoring methods.
3) Writing good test items requires considering factors like reading level, avoiding bias, and ensuring items measure the intended construct.
This document discusses different types of criterion-referenced tests such as entry behavior tests, pretests, practice tests, and posttests. It also covers domains that can be assessed like verbal information, intellectual skills, attitudes, and psychomotor skills. Test items should match objectives and consider learners, context, and quality. Dick and Carey's 5 steps for creating instruments are outlined which involve identifying elements, paraphrasing, sequencing, selecting judgments, and determining scoring. The goal is to effectively evaluate learning and ensure objectives are achieved.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments, focusing on revising instruction based on formative evaluation data. It describes methods for summarizing evaluation data and identifying weaknesses in materials to suggest revisions. The revision process aims to improve instructional materials, strategies, and achievement of learners based on results from formative assessments.
The document discusses eliminating irrelevant barriers and unintended clues in objective test items that can undermine the validity of an assessment. Factors like complex sentences, difficult vocabulary, and unclear instructions are construct-irrelevant barriers that limit students' responses. Test items should measure the intended learning outcomes and not other irrelevant abilities. Care should be taken to avoid ambiguity, wordiness, biases and other barriers that prevent students from demonstrating their actual achievement levels. Clues within items could allow students without sufficient learning to still answer correctly, preventing the items from functioning as intended.
Classroom tests and assessments play a central role in student learning by identifying students' prior knowledge, weaknesses, and strengths to help set learning goals and motivate learning. Effective classroom tests are valid, reliable, and fair, and they provide timely feedback to both students and teachers to check instructional effectiveness, provide learning opportunities, and assess teaching strategy effectiveness.
This document discusses different types of assessment used in education including objective, short answer, and essay questions. Objective questions have one correct answer and include multiple choice, true/false, and matching. They allow for quick scoring but allow guessing. Short answer questions require a word or few sentences response and can measure simple learning outcomes. Essay questions require longer written answers and allow freedom of expression but are more time consuming to score. The document provides examples and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each type.
A good test should have the following key characteristics:
1. It should be a valid instrument that accurately measures what it is intended to measure as evidenced by various types of validity like content validity.
2. It should be a reliable instrument that consistently measures constructs and yields similar results over time as determined through methods like test-retest reliability.
3. It should be objective by eliminating personal bias and opinions of scorers so that different scorers arrive at the same score.
It discuss about what is test and types of test items. Types of items - 1. Objective types a) A) True – false items (Alternate response type B) b) Multiple choice Test Items (Changing Alternative type) C) c) Matching Type Test Item D) d) Simple Recall Type Test Items E) e) Completion Type Test Item 2) Short answer 3) Details answer. It also discuss about advantages and disadvantages of objective type, short answer and details answer.
The document outlines 9 stages of test construction: 1) Planning, 2) Preparing items, 3) Establishing validity, 4) Reliability, 5) Arranging items, 6) Writing directions, 7) Analyzing and revising, 8) Reproducing, and 9) Administering and scoring. It discusses key considerations at each stage such as writing items according to specifications, establishing content and criterion validity, determining reliability through various methods, and ensuring the test is objective, comprehensive, simple, and practical. The final stages cover arranging items by difficulty, providing clear directions, analyzing item performance, and properly administering the test.
Standardized tests are designed to have consistent objectives and criteria across different forms of the test. They measure students' mastery of prescribed grade-level competencies. Developing a standardized test involves determining its purpose, designing test specifications, creating and selecting test items, evaluating items, specifying scoring procedures, and ongoing validation studies. The document outlines these steps and provides examples of standardized language proficiency tests like TOEFL and IELTS.
The document discusses aims, goals, and objectives in curriculum development. It defines aims as the most general level of educational outcomes, goals as reflecting purpose with outcomes in mind, and objectives as the most specific levels. Aims provide direction to educational action and inspire an ideal vision. Goals are statements of intent to be accomplished and have some outcomes in mind. Objectives delineate expected changes in students and intended behaviors. The document also outlines examples of aims, goals, and objectives for different levels of education.
Topic: Subjective and Objective Test
Student Name: Jeejal Samo
Class: B.Ed. Hons Elementary Part (II)
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Administration/Conducting the Test
Student Name: Waqar Hassan
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Qualities of a Good Test
Student Name: Amna Mishal
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
teacher made test Vs standardized testathiranandan
Standardized tests are more rigorous and scientifically developed than teacher-made tests. They require a panel of experts including content specialists, test designers, and teachers to plan the test, write items, test the items, and establish validity and reliability through field testing and statistical analysis. The process ensures the tests accurately measure what they aim to without bias. Teacher-made tests are simpler to create by individual teachers and better tied to local classroom needs, but are not as reliable or valid as standardized tests due to less rigorous development and analysis. Both have advantages for different assessment purposes.
SCORING AND MARKING KEY, QUESTION WISE ANALYSIS OF ACHIEVEMENT TESTrkbioraj24
Achievement test is an important tool in school evaluation and has great significance in measuring instructional progress and progress of the students in the subject area.
Accurate achievement data are very important for planning curriculum and instruction and for program evaluation
This document discusses essay tests as an assessment method. It defines essay tests as those requiring extended written responses. It describes the key features and types of essay questions, including extended and restricted response questions. The document outlines the advantages and disadvantages of essay tests, and provides suggestions for developing, administering, scoring and evaluating essay tests effectively.
1. The document outlines the process of test construction which involves preliminary considerations, reviewing the content domain, item/task writing, assessing content validity, revising items/tasks, field testing, revising based on field testing results, test assembly, selecting performance standards, pilot testing, and preparing manuals.
2. Key steps include specifying test purposes and intended examinees, reviewing content standards/objectives, drafting and editing items/tasks, evaluating items for validity and potential biases, conducting item analysis after field testing, revising or deleting weak items, assembling the final test, and collecting ongoing reliability and validity data.
3. Item analysis involves both qualitative review of item content and format as well as quantitative analysis
This document discusses different types of tests used to assess students. It describes objective tests which can be scored reliably, including multiple choice questions, true/false, matching, and short answer items. Objective tests are easy to construct and score but encourage memorization. Subjective tests like essays allow more flexible answers but are harder to score reliably. Other tests discussed include proficiency, placement, achievement, aptitude, admission, progress and language dominance tests, each with a specific purpose in assessing students.
This document discusses achievement tests, which measure how much a student has learned in a particular subject area. Achievement tests are formal assessments designed to evaluate a student's knowledge and mastery of specific topics. The document outlines important characteristics of effective achievement tests, such as reliability, validity, objectivity, specificity, and ease of administration. Achievement tests can be used to evaluate students' strengths and weaknesses, inform teaching, and determine promotion to the next grade level.
1) The document outlines the steps involved in developing a new test, including defining the test purpose and audience, developing a test plan, writing test items, and specifying administration instructions.
2) Key steps include composing items in various formats like multiple choice, true/false, essays, and developing scoring methods.
3) Writing good test items requires considering factors like reading level, avoiding bias, and ensuring items measure the intended construct.
This document discusses different types of criterion-referenced tests such as entry behavior tests, pretests, practice tests, and posttests. It also covers domains that can be assessed like verbal information, intellectual skills, attitudes, and psychomotor skills. Test items should match objectives and consider learners, context, and quality. Dick and Carey's 5 steps for creating instruments are outlined which involve identifying elements, paraphrasing, sequencing, selecting judgments, and determining scoring. The goal is to effectively evaluate learning and ensure objectives are achieved.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments, focusing on revising instruction based on formative evaluation data. It describes methods for summarizing evaluation data and identifying weaknesses in materials to suggest revisions. The revision process aims to improve instructional materials, strategies, and achievement of learners based on results from formative assessments.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments for instructional design. It covers:
- Types of criterion-referenced tests including entry skills tests, pre-tests, practice tests, and post-tests.
- Designing criterion-referenced tests with considerations for test format, mastery levels, test item criteria, and assessing different domains.
- Alternative assessment instruments like rubrics for evaluating performances, products, and attitudes. Portfolio assessments are also discussed.
This document discusses various types of educational tests and assessments. It defines different types of test items such as true/false, matching, and essay questions. It also covers topics like developing test objectives, writing clear questions, scoring responses, and analyzing results. Additionally, it outlines the advantages and disadvantages of both objective and essay style exams in evaluating student learning.
This document discusses tests, assessments, and teaching, defining them and explaining their relationships. It outlines different types of assessments including formative and summative, norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests. It also covers approaches to language testing like discrete-point and integrative testing as well as current issues involving views on intelligence and computer-based testing.
Chapter 3(designing classroom language tests)Kheang Sokheng
This document discusses key considerations for designing classroom language tests. It begins by outlining 5 critical questions to guide test design: 1) purpose of the test, 2) objectives, 3) how specifications reflect purpose and objectives, 4) task selection and arrangement, and 5) scoring and feedback. It then elaborates on each question, providing guidance on defining the test purpose and objectives, ensuring specifications align, selecting authentic and practical tasks, and determining appropriate feedback. The document also outlines common test types like proficiency, placement, and achievement tests and gives practical steps for test construction, including assessing clear objectives, developing specifications, devising tasks, and designing multiple-choice items.
Survey and interview are possible methods to collect data on job satisfaction. A survey or interview could ask respondents questions to determine their level of satisfaction with various aspects of their job in a structured way. Observations alone may not provide insight into peoples' subjective experiences of satisfaction.
Assessment does not limit in paper pencil only. Some students excel in performance-based assessment thus they should be tested using authentic assessment to have balance.
The document discusses developing criterion-referenced assessment instruments that are aligned to instructional objectives based on a learner-centered approach. It defines criterion-referenced tests and different types of assessments including formative and summative evaluations. Guidelines are provided for writing test items, determining mastery levels, selecting appropriate response types, and evaluating tests and congruence within the instructional design process.
The document discusses steps for assembling and reviewing test items:
1) Test items should be written on index cards to facilitate editing and arrangement. Each card should include information about the learning outcome and content being measured.
2) Items should be checked against test specifications to ensure a representative sample of content is covered. Items should be organized by type and learning outcome, then difficulty level.
3) Test directions should clearly convey the purpose, time allowed, answer format, and what to do about guessing.
All students
Materials: Review worksheet
Response: Worksheet
II. New Material
Tier 1:
Tier 2:
Tier 3:
III. Guided Practice
Tier 1:
Tier 2:
Tier 3:
IV. Independent Practice
All students: Practice worksheet
V. Review
All students: Exit ticket
Tiered Lesson Example
I. Review/Prerequisite Check (5 min)
- All students complete review worksheet independently
II. New Material (10 min)
Tier 1: Concrete model demonstration of addition
Tier 2: Representational model demonstration
Tier 3: Abstract model demonstration
Achivement test Power point presentationKittyTuttu
The document provides information on achievement tests. It begins with defining achievement test as a test used to measure what students have learned through instruction. It then outlines the key components of achievement tests, including their definition, functions, characteristics, types, and the steps involved in constructing them. Specifically, it discusses standardized tests versus teacher-made tests, and the different question formats used in achievement tests like essay questions, short-answer questions, and objective questions.
This document outlines the 5 stages of constructing a classroom language test:
1) Determining test objectives and content, 2) Planning test specifications such as item types and timing, 3) Writing the test while ensuring face validity, authenticity, and instructions are clear, 4) Pre-testing the exam on similar students and revising, 5) Preparing the physical resources needed to administer the test such as copies, equipment, and classroom setup. The goal is to create a reliable and valid assessment that accurately measures student performance and provides useful information to evaluate teaching programs.
Assessment of student learning by kyle yvonnekyleyvonne09
This document discusses different types of assessment items for measuring student learning, including interpretive test items, performance test items, and factors to consider when constructing tests. Interpretive test items measure complex learning outcomes through items like multiple choice questions based on materials like pictures or paragraphs. Performance test items aim to simulate real-life situations to assess skills. They are advantageous for measuring application of skills but are more difficult and time-consuming to develop and score reliably. When creating any test items, factors like avoiding bias, unclear directions, or clues that give away answers need to be considered.
This presentation was made in 2003 when Portfolios were not in currently use in Peru. It provides a basic idea of how they can be used and some people may still find it useful.
This document provides an overview of a workshop on best practices in classroom assessment. The workshop schedule outlines sessions on developing SMART objectives, characteristics of effective assessment, formative and summative assessment types, and classroom observations with feedback. The workshop objectives are to help participants write objectives addressing different learning domains and thinking skills, identify validity and reliability in tools, recognize the importance of formative assessment, and design various assessment instruments. The document also includes descriptions of domains of learning, Bloom's taxonomy, validity and reliability, formative versus summative assessment, and checklists for developing different assessment item types.
This document discusses guidelines for constructing classroom tests. It outlines the basic principles that should guide teachers, such as measuring all instructional objectives and using appropriate test items. It also describes the attributes of a good test, including validity, reliability, objectivity, and fairness. The document provides steps for constructing classroom tests, such as identifying objectives, preparing a table of specifications, writing test items, and sequencing items. It includes an example of how to prepare a table of specifications and allocate test items to topics. Finally, it lists general guidelines for writing test items, such as avoiding ambiguity and providing one correct answer.
This document discusses assembling, administering, and appraising classroom tests and assessments. It emphasizes the importance of careful preparation, including creating an assessment plan aligned to learning outcomes and selecting appropriate question formats. When constructing test items, each item should be clearly written and recorded with relevant information. A thorough review process examines items for issues like ambiguity, bias, and technical errors. Directions should provide necessary information to students. Scoring procedures and analyzing item effectiveness are also reviewed to improve classroom assessments.
The document provides information about effective testing. It discusses test definitions and uses in educational assessment. It outlines the key lessons which include test types, preparing effective tests, and factors to consider when constructing a good test. The document also discusses uses and classifications of tests. The lessons emphasize objectives, instruction, assessment, and evaluation as keys to effective testing.
Topic: Test, Testing and Evaluation
Student Name: Urooj Fatima
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Daignostic Evaluation.
Student Name: Syeda Wajeeha
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Objective Type Items, Recognition Type Items and Recall ItemsDr. Amjad Ali Arain
Topic: Objective Type Items, Recognition Type Items and Recall Items
Student Name: Munazza Mohsin Samo
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Test Testing and Evaluation
Student Name: Abdul Rauf Ansari
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Frequency Distribution
Student Name: Abdul Hafeez
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Meaning of Test, Testing and Evaluation
Student Name: Wardha Samo
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Counselling of Students After Reporting The Results
Student Name: Siraj ul-Haque
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Essay Type Test
Student Name: Shakti Lal
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
The document discusses the purpose, principles, and scope of testing and evaluation. The purpose of testing is to assess student performance and assign grades. Testing also helps predict future performance. There are four key principles of testing: practicality, reliability, validity, and authenticity. Evaluation aims to determine competence, predict educational practices, and clarify proficiency. Evaluation techniques should be selected based on their purposes and limitations. The scope of evaluation includes making value judgments, determining how well objectives were attained, and identifying student strengths, weaknesses, and needs.
Topic: Reliability
Student Name: Sarang Joyo
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Report Test Result to Administration
Student Name: Rooha Shaikh
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
The document discusses test development and evaluation. It defines a test item as a specific task that test takers are asked to perform. It outlines the steps for preparing test items, which include writing items according to guidelines, selecting items based on a table of specifications, reviewing and editing items, arranging items, and deciding on scoring. The document also lists principles for preparing test items such as making sure items are appropriate for the learning outcomes and free from ambiguity, bias, and technical errors. Finally, it provides a sample table of specifications that outlines the test items to be included based on topics, objectives, and item types.
Topic: Validity
Student Name: Parkash Mal
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Learning Objectives
Student Name: Sualiha Lodhi
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
The document discusses test development and evaluation reporting for a B.Ed program. It covers principles of reporting test results to parents, including using clear language and explaining scores. The purposes of reporting are to recognize student achievement, assist in identifying student potential, enable parental support, and help parents understand student strengths and weaknesses. Reporting methods can include parent-teacher conferences, written reports, parent meetings, and newsletters.
Topic: Order and Ranking
Student Name: Ansar Hussain
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Types of Evaluation
Student Name: Aneeqa Hashmi
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: School Evaluation Program
Student Name: Amtal Basit Tooba
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Summative Evaluation
Student Name: Akhtiar Ali
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Formative Evaluation
Student Name: Aitzaz Ahsan
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
Assembling The Test
1. Chapter 14Chapter 14
Assembling, Administering, andAssembling, Administering, and
Appraising classroom tests andAppraising classroom tests and
assessmentsassessments
2. Recording the test itemsRecording the test items
Each individual test item should be recordedEach individual test item should be recorded
separately and contain informationseparately and contain information
regarding the instructional objective,regarding the instructional objective,
specific learning outcome, and the contentspecific learning outcome, and the content
measured by each item.measured by each item.
3. Reviewing Test Items andReviewing Test Items and
Assessment TasksAssessment Tasks
1.1. Is the format appropriate for the learningIs the format appropriate for the learning
outcome being measured?outcome being measured?
2.2. Does the knowledge, understanding, orDoes the knowledge, understanding, or
thinking skill called forth by the item or taskthinking skill called forth by the item or task
match the specific learning outcome andmatch the specific learning outcome and
subject-matter content being measured?subject-matter content being measured?
3.3. Is the point of the item or task clear?Is the point of the item or task clear?
4.4. Is the item or task free from excess verbiage?Is the item or task free from excess verbiage?
4. Reviewing Test Items andReviewing Test Items and
Assessment TasksAssessment Tasks
5. Does the item have an answer that would5. Does the item have an answer that would
be agreed on by experts? How well wouldbe agreed on by experts? How well would
experts agree about the degree ofexperts agree about the degree of
excellence of task performance?excellence of task performance?
6. Is the item or task free from technical6. Is the item or task free from technical
errors and irrelevant cues?errors and irrelevant cues?
7. Is the item or task free from racial, ethnic,7. Is the item or task free from racial, ethnic,
and sexual bias?and sexual bias?
5. Arranging Items in the TestArranging Items in the Test
1.1. True-false or alternative-response itemsTrue-false or alternative-response items
2.2. Matching itemsMatching items
3.3. Short-answer itemsShort-answer items
4.4. Multiple- choice itemsMultiple- choice items
5.5. Interpretive exercisesInterpretive exercises
6. Preparing Directions for the Test orPreparing Directions for the Test or
AssessmentAssessment
1.1. Purpose of the test or assessmentPurpose of the test or assessment
2.2. Time allowed for completing the test orTime allowed for completing the test or
performing the taskperforming the task
3.3. Directions for respondingDirections for responding
4.4. How to record the answersHow to record the answers
5.5. What to do about guessing for selection-What to do about guessing for selection-
type test itemstype test items
6.6. The basis for scoring open-ended orThe basis for scoring open-ended or
extended responsesextended responses
7. Item AnalysisItem Analysis
After the test has been scored, you shouldAfter the test has been scored, you should
appraise the effectiveness of each item byappraise the effectiveness of each item by
means of item analysis.means of item analysis.
Did the item function as intended?Did the item function as intended?
Were the test items of appropriate difficulty?Were the test items of appropriate difficulty?
Were the test items free of irrelevant clues andWere the test items free of irrelevant clues and
other defects?other defects?
Was each of the distracters effective (in multipleWas each of the distracters effective (in multiple
choice items)?choice items)?