Presenter: Dr. A R Shaan
Moderator: Dr. S B Choudhary
Michael DeBakey & Alton Oschner
Abdominal Abscess
“ well-defined collections of infected purulent material that
are walled off from the rest of the peritoneal cavity by
inflammatory adhesions, loops of intestines and their
mesentry, the greater omentum or other abdominal viscera”
-Maingot’s 12th ed.
Types of Intra abdominal abscess
 Intraperitoneal( Extravisceral)
 Visceral
 Retroperitoneal
Intraperitoneal spaces
Perihepatic Spaces
Extravisceral Abscess
2 situations:
Resolution of diffuse peritonitis loculated infection
Perforation of a viscous or Anastomotic Breakdown
Retroperitoneal spaces
Pathophysiology
3 major defense mechanisms of peritoneal cavity
Mechanical clearance via Diaphragmatic Lymphatics
Phagocytosis and destruction of adherent bacteria
Sequestration and walling off of bacteria, with delayed
clearance
Bacterial Contamination
Hyperemia
Exudative fluid
Macrophages
Neutrophilic
Exudate
2-4 hr
Innate
Immunity
TNF-α
IL-1
IL-6
IL-10
RESOLUTION
of peritonitis
Mast cells
Mesothelial lining
Cells
Cytokines
procagulants
Fibrin
COMPARTMENTALIZATION
of peritonitis
ABSCESS
Factors favouring abscess
LOCAL FACTORS MICROBIAL FACTORS
Local fibrin deposition
Low pH
Particulate stool
Hypoxia
Polymicrobial Flora
Bacteroides fragilis
Capsular polysaccharide
Clinical Features
 High spiking fevers
 Chills
 Tachycardia
 Tachypnoea
 Leukocytosis
 Localised abdominal pain
 Anorexia
 Delay in return of bowel function
Special Features
 Subphrenic Abscess
 Paracolic abscess
 Pelvic abscess
 Retroperitoneal Abscess
Diagnostic tests
Xray
CT Scan
USG Scan
MRI
Abdominal Xrays
 Air fluid levels
 Extraluminal gas
 Soft tissue mass displacing the bowel
 Elevated diaphragm
 Collapse/consolidation at lung base
Diagnostic features in CT scan
 Low CT attenuation
 Mass effect displacing normal
structures
 “lucent centre with rim
enhancement”
 Gas in fluid collection
CT Scan vs USG
Advantages of CT Disadvantages of CT
Not impaired in ileus
Wound dressings and stomas
Open abdomen
Retroperitoneal and pancreatic region
Absence of rim enhancement/ gas/
visible septations
High leucocyte and protein content
Loculated Abscess
Subphrenic and pulmonic fluid
MRI
Delineate the extent of an abscess
Pregnancy
Management
Adequate resuscitation and support
Antimicrobial therapy
Source control/ abscess drainage
Resuscitation & Support
ABC
Oral/enteric nutritional/ TPN
Antimicrobial Therapy
3 Categories:
 community- acquired infections of mild to moderate severity
 High risk/ severe community- acquired infections
 Health care associated infections
Community acquired infections
Mild-moderate severity
(perforated/ abscessed appendicitis and other
infections of mild-moderate severity)
High Risk or Severe
(severe physiological disturbance, advanced age,
immunocompromised state)
Cefoxitin
Ertapenem
Moxifloxacin
Ticaricillin-clavulanic acid
Imipenem-cilastin
Meropenem
Doripenem
Piperacillin-tazobactum
Cefazolin
Cefuroxime
Ceftriaxone
Cefotaxime + Metronidazole
Ciprofloxacin
Levofloxacin
Cefepime
Ceftazidime
+ Metronidazole
Ciprofolacin
Levofloxacin
Health care associated infections
Organism Carbepenem Piperacillin-
tazobactum
Ceftazidime/cef
epime +
metronidazole
Aminoglycoside Vancomycin
<20% Res.
Pseudomonas
ESBL
Enterobacteracea,
acenetobacter,
MDR-GNB
√ √ √
ESBL-
Enterobacteraceae
√ √ √
P. Aeruginosa>20%
res ceftazidime
√ √ √
MRSA √
Pyogenic liver abscesses
< 3cm
Single/multiple
Antibiotic therapy
PCD if not responding
> 3 cm
unilocular
antibiotics
PCD by needle
aspiration or
catheter
Surgical therapy
if not responding
multilocular
antibiotics
Percutaneous
drainage
Surgical therapy by
resection / drainage if
not responsive
Amoebic Liver abscess
 Metronidazole 750mg TID for 14 days
 Chloroquine
 Dihydromentine
 Drainage ---- needle aspirations
Percutaneous catheter drainage
Source Control
Percutaneous Drainage
Surgery
Prerequisites for percutaneous drainage
 Anatomically safe route
 Well defined unilocular abscess cavity
 Surgical & radiological evaluation
 Surgical backup for technical failure
Post-requisites for percutaneous drainage
 Gram’s stain and culture
 8-12f catheter
 Closed drainage system
 Irrigation of catheter once daily
 Repeat CT
Complications with percutaneous drainage
 Enterocutaneous fistula
 Bacteremia
 Sepsis
 Vascular injury
 Enteric puncture
 Transpleural catheter placement
Criteria for removal of a Drain
 Clinical resolution of septic parameters
 Minimal drainage from the catheter
 CT evidence of resolution
Comparing outcome in different scenarios….
 Single well defined bacterial abscess with no enteric communication
 Abscess with enteric communication
 Interloop abscess/ difficult to access abscess
 Early post operative diffuse peritonitis
 Infected tumour mass
Fungal abscess
Infected hematoma
Pancreatic necrosis
 Small abscess (<4cm diameter)
Surgical Drainage
 Failure of percutaneous drainage
 Diffuse infection
 Content of abscess is too thick
 Access is impossible
Surgical approach
 Transperitoneal approach
 Extraperitoneal approach
Posterior Extraserous Approach
Anterior incisions
Every operation in surgery is an experiment
in bacteriology
-Berkeley Moynihan

Intra abdominal abscess

  • 1.
    Presenter: Dr. AR Shaan Moderator: Dr. S B Choudhary
  • 2.
    Michael DeBakey &Alton Oschner
  • 3.
    Abdominal Abscess “ well-definedcollections of infected purulent material that are walled off from the rest of the peritoneal cavity by inflammatory adhesions, loops of intestines and their mesentry, the greater omentum or other abdominal viscera” -Maingot’s 12th ed.
  • 4.
    Types of Intraabdominal abscess  Intraperitoneal( Extravisceral)  Visceral  Retroperitoneal
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Extravisceral Abscess 2 situations: Resolutionof diffuse peritonitis loculated infection Perforation of a viscous or Anastomotic Breakdown
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Pathophysiology 3 major defensemechanisms of peritoneal cavity Mechanical clearance via Diaphragmatic Lymphatics Phagocytosis and destruction of adherent bacteria Sequestration and walling off of bacteria, with delayed clearance
  • 10.
    Bacterial Contamination Hyperemia Exudative fluid Macrophages Neutrophilic Exudate 2-4hr Innate Immunity TNF-α IL-1 IL-6 IL-10 RESOLUTION of peritonitis Mast cells Mesothelial lining Cells Cytokines procagulants Fibrin COMPARTMENTALIZATION of peritonitis ABSCESS
  • 11.
    Factors favouring abscess LOCALFACTORS MICROBIAL FACTORS Local fibrin deposition Low pH Particulate stool Hypoxia Polymicrobial Flora Bacteroides fragilis Capsular polysaccharide
  • 12.
    Clinical Features  Highspiking fevers  Chills  Tachycardia  Tachypnoea  Leukocytosis  Localised abdominal pain  Anorexia  Delay in return of bowel function
  • 13.
    Special Features  SubphrenicAbscess  Paracolic abscess  Pelvic abscess  Retroperitoneal Abscess
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Abdominal Xrays  Airfluid levels  Extraluminal gas  Soft tissue mass displacing the bowel  Elevated diaphragm  Collapse/consolidation at lung base
  • 16.
    Diagnostic features inCT scan  Low CT attenuation  Mass effect displacing normal structures  “lucent centre with rim enhancement”  Gas in fluid collection
  • 17.
    CT Scan vsUSG Advantages of CT Disadvantages of CT Not impaired in ileus Wound dressings and stomas Open abdomen Retroperitoneal and pancreatic region Absence of rim enhancement/ gas/ visible septations High leucocyte and protein content Loculated Abscess Subphrenic and pulmonic fluid
  • 18.
    MRI Delineate the extentof an abscess Pregnancy
  • 19.
    Management Adequate resuscitation andsupport Antimicrobial therapy Source control/ abscess drainage
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Antimicrobial Therapy 3 Categories: community- acquired infections of mild to moderate severity  High risk/ severe community- acquired infections  Health care associated infections
  • 22.
    Community acquired infections Mild-moderateseverity (perforated/ abscessed appendicitis and other infections of mild-moderate severity) High Risk or Severe (severe physiological disturbance, advanced age, immunocompromised state) Cefoxitin Ertapenem Moxifloxacin Ticaricillin-clavulanic acid Imipenem-cilastin Meropenem Doripenem Piperacillin-tazobactum Cefazolin Cefuroxime Ceftriaxone Cefotaxime + Metronidazole Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Cefepime Ceftazidime + Metronidazole Ciprofolacin Levofloxacin
  • 23.
    Health care associatedinfections Organism Carbepenem Piperacillin- tazobactum Ceftazidime/cef epime + metronidazole Aminoglycoside Vancomycin <20% Res. Pseudomonas ESBL Enterobacteracea, acenetobacter, MDR-GNB √ √ √ ESBL- Enterobacteraceae √ √ √ P. Aeruginosa>20% res ceftazidime √ √ √ MRSA √
  • 24.
    Pyogenic liver abscesses <3cm Single/multiple Antibiotic therapy PCD if not responding > 3 cm unilocular antibiotics PCD by needle aspiration or catheter Surgical therapy if not responding multilocular antibiotics Percutaneous drainage Surgical therapy by resection / drainage if not responsive
  • 25.
    Amoebic Liver abscess Metronidazole 750mg TID for 14 days  Chloroquine  Dihydromentine  Drainage ---- needle aspirations Percutaneous catheter drainage
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Prerequisites for percutaneousdrainage  Anatomically safe route  Well defined unilocular abscess cavity  Surgical & radiological evaluation  Surgical backup for technical failure
  • 28.
    Post-requisites for percutaneousdrainage  Gram’s stain and culture  8-12f catheter  Closed drainage system  Irrigation of catheter once daily  Repeat CT
  • 29.
    Complications with percutaneousdrainage  Enterocutaneous fistula  Bacteremia  Sepsis  Vascular injury  Enteric puncture  Transpleural catheter placement
  • 30.
    Criteria for removalof a Drain  Clinical resolution of septic parameters  Minimal drainage from the catheter  CT evidence of resolution
  • 31.
    Comparing outcome indifferent scenarios….  Single well defined bacterial abscess with no enteric communication  Abscess with enteric communication  Interloop abscess/ difficult to access abscess  Early post operative diffuse peritonitis  Infected tumour mass Fungal abscess Infected hematoma Pancreatic necrosis  Small abscess (<4cm diameter)
  • 32.
    Surgical Drainage  Failureof percutaneous drainage  Diffuse infection  Content of abscess is too thick  Access is impossible
  • 33.
    Surgical approach  Transperitonealapproach  Extraperitoneal approach
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
    Every operation insurgery is an experiment in bacteriology -Berkeley Moynihan