Dr. Christine Pereira
Academic Skills Adviser
ask@brunel.ac.uk
Upon completion of this workshop, you will be able to:

ONE
Understand the difference between strength and significance for correlation
coefficients.

TWO
Choose the correct correlation coefficient to use based on the data.

THREE
Obtain correlations in SPSS and interpret the output.

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

2
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

3
Correlation Coefficients
 Measure the strength of a relationship between
variables.
 First make a scatter plot



x-axis: Independent variable
y-axis: Dependent variable

 What shape does the scatter plot make?





Linear (i.e., “straight line”)
Always increasing, but not linear
Always decreasing, but not linear
Curvilinear

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

4
Correlation Coefficients
 Measure the strength of a relationship between
variables.
 First make a scatter plot



x-axis: Independent variable
y-axis: Dependent variable

 What shape does the scatter plot make?





Linear (i.e., “straight line”)
Always increasing, but not linear
Always decreasing, but not linear
Curvilinear

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

Pearson’s r

5
Correlation Coefficients
 Measure the strength of a relationship between
variables.
 First make a scatter plot



x-axis: Independent variable
y-axis: Dependent variable

 What shape does the scatter plot make?





Linear (i.e., “straight line”)
Always increasing, but not linear
Always decreasing, but not linear
Curvilinear

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

Spearman’s rho

6
Evaluating Strength. Graphically.
Strong relationships

Weak relationships

Y

Y

X
Y

X
Y

X
Dr. Christine Pereira

X
ASK at Brunel (2013)

7
Evaluating Strength. Graphically.
Increasing,
but not linear

Dr. Christine Pereira

Decreasing,
but not linear

ASK at Brunel (2013)

8
Evaluating Strength. Graphically.
NO relationship
Y

X

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

9
Evaluating Strength. Graphically.
Curvilinear relationships
Y

X
Y

X
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

10
Evaluating Strength. Graphically.
Both lines have
the same
correlation
coefficient

 The correlation is NOT the steepness of the line.
 The correlation is how close the data points are to a
line or curve.
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

11
Evaluating Strength. Numerically.
 Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1.


Between -1 and 0: A negative relationship
• Higher values for the IV result in lower values for the DV
Y

Y

X

X

* IV stands for Independent Variable and DV for Dependent Variable
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

12
Evaluating Strength. Numerically.
 Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1.


Between 0 and 1: A positive relationship
• Higher values for the IV result in higher values for the DV
Y

Y

X

X

* IV stands for Independent Variable and DV for Dependent Variable
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

13
Evaluating Strength. Numerically.
 Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1.
Sign of
correlation
coefficient

Strong

+ values

0.5 to 1.0

Positive relationship

- values
Negative relationship

Dr. Christine Pereira

Moderate

Weak

Very weak
or None

-1.0 to -0.5

ASK at Brunel (2013)

14
Evaluating Strength. Numerically.
 Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1.
Sign of
correlation
coefficient

Strong

Moderate

+ values

0.5 to 1.0

0.3 to 0.49

-1.0 to -0.5

-0.49 to -0.3

Positive relationship

- values
Negative relationship

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

Weak

Very weak
or None

15
Evaluating Strength. Numerically.
 Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1.
Sign of
correlation
coefficient

Strong

Moderate

Weak

+ values

0.5 to 1.0

0.3 to 0.49

0.1 to 0.29

-1.0 to -0.5

-0.49 to -0.3

-0.29 to -0.1

Positive relationship

- values
Negative relationship

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

Very weak
or None

16
Evaluating Strength. Numerically.
 Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1.
Sign of
correlation
coefficient

Strong

Moderate

Weak

Very weak
or None

+ values

0.5 to 1.0

0.3 to 0.49

0.1 to 0.29

0 to 0.09

-1.0 to -0.5

-0.49 to -0.3

-0.29 to -0.1

-0.09 to 0

Positive relationship

- values
Negative relationship

 A coefficient of zero means NO relationship.
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

17
Exercise 2
Match r to the most appropriate scatter plot.
Y

Y

r = -0.9
X

r = 0.6
r=0

Y

X
Y

r = -0.5
X
Dr. Christine Pereira

X
ASK at Brunel (2013)

18
Exercise 3
 Which X is most strongly correlated with Y?

r
Y

Dr. Christine Pereira

X1
0.53

X2
-0.62

ASK at Brunel (2013)

X3
0.21

X4
0.07

19
Exercise 3
 Which X is most strongly correlated with Y?
 Which X is least correlated with Y?
r
Y

Dr. Christine Pereira

X1
0.53

X2
-0.62

ASK at Brunel (2013)

X3
0.21

X4
0.07

20
Exercise 4
 Which X are most strongly correlated?

r

X1

1

X2

-0.44

1

X3

0.023

-0.71

1

X4

Dr. Christine Pereira

X1

X2

0.39

0.52

-.28

ASK at Brunel (2013)

X3

X4

1

21
Exercise 4
 Which X are most strongly correlated?
 Which X are least correlated?
r

X1

1

X2

-0.44

1

X3

0.023

-0.71

1

X4

Dr. Christine Pereira

X1

X2

0.39

0.52

-.28

ASK at Brunel (2013)

X3

X4

1

22
Exercise 4
 Which X are most strongly correlated?
 Which X are least correlated?
r

X1

X2

X3

X1

1

X2

-0.44

1

X3

0.023

-0.71

1

X4

0.39

0.52

-.28

X4

1

Why are these correlation coefficients 1?
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

23
Correlation Coefficients
 Measure the strength of a relationship
 They only measure association
 They do NOT imply causation!

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

24
Example 2. Correlation ≠ Causation

 Which variable is dependent? Independent?
 Estimate the strength of the correlation:


Weak, moderate or strong?

 Does age cause IQ to increase?

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

25
Strength vs Significance
 There are TWO parts to correlations:



Strength – Correlation coefficient
Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%)
Coefficient

Significance

Range of values

Btwn -1 and +1

Btwn 0 and 1

Purpose

How strongly
correlated are the two
variables

Is the observed correlation
significant OR has it just
occurred by chance?

Evaluation

Use table to
determine if weak,
medium or strong

Compare to α:
If p<α, significant correlation
If p>α, non-sig. correlation

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

26
Strength vs Significance
 There are TWO parts to correlations:



Strength – Correlation coefficient
Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%)
Coefficient

Significance

Range of values

Btwn -1 and +1

Btwn 0 and 1

Purpose

How strongly
correlated are the two
variables

Is the observed correlation
significant OR has it just
occurred by chance?

Evaluation

Use table to
determine if weak,
medium or strong

Compare to α:
If p<α, significant correlation
If p>α, non-sig. correlation

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

27
Strength vs Significance
 There are TWO parts to correlations:



Strength – Correlation coefficient
Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%)
Coefficient

Significance

Range of values

Btwn -1 and +1

Btwn 0 and 1

Purpose

How strongly
correlated are the two
variables

Is the observed correlation
significant OR has it just
occurred by chance?

Evaluation

Use table to
determine if weak,
medium or strong

Compare to α:
If p<α, significant correlation
If p>α, non-sig. correlation

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

28
Strength vs Significance
 There are TWO parts to correlations:



Strength – Correlation coefficient
Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%)
Coefficient

Significance

Range of values

Btwn -1 and +1

Btwn 0 and 1

Purpose

How strongly
correlated are the two
variables

Is the observed correlation
significant OR has it just
occurred by chance?

Evaluation

Use table to
determine if weak,
medium or strong

Compare to α:
If p<α, significant correlation
If p>α, non-sig. correlation

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

29
Strength vs Significance
 There are TWO parts to correlations:



Strength – Correlation coefficient
Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%)
Coefficient

Significance

Range of values

Btwn -1 and +1

Btwn 0 and 1

Purpose

How strongly
correlated are the two
variables

Is the observed correlation
significant OR has it just
occurred by chance?

Evaluation

Use table to
determine if weak,
medium or strong

Compare to α:
If p<α, significant correlation
If p>α, non-sig. correlation

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

30
Strength vs Significance
 There are TWO parts to correlations:



Strength – Correlation coefficient
Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%)
Coefficient

Significance

Range of values

Btwn -1 and +1

Btwn 0 and 1

Purpose

How strongly
correlated are the two
variables

Is the observed correlation
significant OR has it just
occurred by chance?

Evaluation

Use table to
determine if weak,
medium or strong

Compare to α:
If p<α, significant correlation
If p>α, non-sig. correlation

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

31
Example 4.
r

Exam %

Exam
Anxiety

Exam %

-

Exam
Anxiety
Revision
Time

-0.441

-

.397

-.709

Revision
Time

-

How do we know if the correlation
between two variables is significant?
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

32
Example 4. Let α = 0.05
r

Exam %

Exam %

-

Exam
Anxiety
Revision
Time

-0.441
.001

Exam
Anxiety

Revision
Time

Significance value
(p-value)

.397

-.709

.062

-

.000

p>α

H0: Correlation is not statistically significant.

p<α

H1: Correlation is statistically significant.

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

33
Example 4. Conclusion for Anxiety vs Exam %
 r = -.441, p = .001 and α = .05
 p<α




Reject H0 in favour of H1.
There is strong evidence that a statistically significant
relationship exists between anxiety and exam score.
The relationship between student’s anxiety before an exam
is moderately negatively correlated with their exam score.
• Negative means higher scores for the IV resulted in lower
scores for the DV

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

34
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

35
Levels of Measurement
Types of Data

Categorical

Scale

Qualitative

Quantitative

Nominal

Ordinal

(Unranked categories)

(Ranked categories)





Marital Status
Political Party
Eye Color




Satisfaction level
Level of agreement

Not Grouped







Age in years
Time
Weight
Height
No. of cars
No. of students

 Determines types of correlation coefficients used to

analyse your variables.
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

36
Parametric vs. Non-parametric
 Parametric data



Usually, we are assuming normally distributed.
Typically, scale data are considered parametric
...but this assumption should still be checked.

 Non-parametric data




Not assuming that the data is normally distributed
All nominal and ordinal data.
Sometimes scale data.

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

37
Relationships/Association
Dr. Christine Pereira

r = Pearson’s r
ρ = Spearman’s rank
τ = Kendall’s tau
Χ2 = Chi-square test

ASK at Brunel (2013)

38
Relationships/Association
Dr. Christine Pereira

Example 5. Age vs Income

ASK at Brunel (2013)

39
Relationships/Association
Dr. Christine Pereira

Example 5. Age vs Income

ASK at Brunel (2013)

40
Relationships/Association
Dr. Christine Pereira

Example 5. Age vs Income

r = Pearson’s r

ASK at Brunel (2013)

41
Relationships/Association

Example 6. Age Groups (3 grps) vs Income

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

42
Relationships/Association

Example 6. Age Groups (3 grps) vs Income

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

43
Relationships/Association

Example 6. Age Groups (3 grps) vs Income

Dr. Christine Pereira

ρ = Spearman’s rank

ASK at Brunel (2013)

44
Relationships/Association
Dr. Christine Pereira

What happens if I
end up here?!

ASK at Brunel (2013)

45
Relationships/Association
Dr. Christine Pereira

Recode your scale
variable into groups

– converting it to
an ordinal variable

ASK at Brunel (2013)

46
Relationships/Association
Dr. Christine Pereira

**use τ instead of ρ if n is small or if the
observed count between 2 groups
(crosstabs) is small.

ASK at Brunel (2013)

47
Relationships/Association
Dr. Christine Pereira

Effect Size
Phi – 2 x 2 table
Cramer’s V – bigger than 2 x 2 table

ASK at Brunel (2013)

48
But which one gives ‘better’ results?

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

49
But which one gives ‘better’ results?
 Do honest research:



Choose the coefficient that is most appropriate for
your data!
Do not choose the coefficient that gives you ‘better’
results!!

 Your aim is accuracy

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

50
Click here

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

51
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

52
Correlation Coefficients in SPSS
 Download and Save EmployeeSurvey.sav from
Blackboard.


Under My Organisations select Academic Skills

 Open SPSS 20
 Open EmployeeSurvey.sav from within SPSS


If you try to open the file first SPSS will crash!!

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

53
Correlation Coefficients in SPSS

Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

54
Correlation Coefficients in SPSS

Variables to be
correlated go here

Tick the correct correlation
coefficient here
Puts * when p < 0.05
Puts ** when p < 0.01
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

55
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

56
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

57
Dr. Christine Pereira

ASK at Brunel (2013)

61

Correlations using SPSS

  • 1.
    Dr. Christine Pereira AcademicSkills Adviser ask@brunel.ac.uk
  • 2.
    Upon completion ofthis workshop, you will be able to: ONE Understand the difference between strength and significance for correlation coefficients. TWO Choose the correct correlation coefficient to use based on the data. THREE Obtain correlations in SPSS and interpret the output. Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 2
  • 3.
    Dr. Christine Pereira ASKat Brunel (2013) 3
  • 4.
    Correlation Coefficients  Measurethe strength of a relationship between variables.  First make a scatter plot   x-axis: Independent variable y-axis: Dependent variable  What shape does the scatter plot make?     Linear (i.e., “straight line”) Always increasing, but not linear Always decreasing, but not linear Curvilinear Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 4
  • 5.
    Correlation Coefficients  Measurethe strength of a relationship between variables.  First make a scatter plot   x-axis: Independent variable y-axis: Dependent variable  What shape does the scatter plot make?     Linear (i.e., “straight line”) Always increasing, but not linear Always decreasing, but not linear Curvilinear Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) Pearson’s r 5
  • 6.
    Correlation Coefficients  Measurethe strength of a relationship between variables.  First make a scatter plot   x-axis: Independent variable y-axis: Dependent variable  What shape does the scatter plot make?     Linear (i.e., “straight line”) Always increasing, but not linear Always decreasing, but not linear Curvilinear Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) Spearman’s rho 6
  • 7.
    Evaluating Strength. Graphically. Strongrelationships Weak relationships Y Y X Y X Y X Dr. Christine Pereira X ASK at Brunel (2013) 7
  • 8.
    Evaluating Strength. Graphically. Increasing, butnot linear Dr. Christine Pereira Decreasing, but not linear ASK at Brunel (2013) 8
  • 9.
    Evaluating Strength. Graphically. NOrelationship Y X Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 9
  • 10.
    Evaluating Strength. Graphically. Curvilinearrelationships Y X Y X Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 10
  • 11.
    Evaluating Strength. Graphically. Bothlines have the same correlation coefficient  The correlation is NOT the steepness of the line.  The correlation is how close the data points are to a line or curve. Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 11
  • 12.
    Evaluating Strength. Numerically. Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1.  Between -1 and 0: A negative relationship • Higher values for the IV result in lower values for the DV Y Y X X * IV stands for Independent Variable and DV for Dependent Variable Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 12
  • 13.
    Evaluating Strength. Numerically. Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1.  Between 0 and 1: A positive relationship • Higher values for the IV result in higher values for the DV Y Y X X * IV stands for Independent Variable and DV for Dependent Variable Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 13
  • 14.
    Evaluating Strength. Numerically. Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1. Sign of correlation coefficient Strong + values 0.5 to 1.0 Positive relationship - values Negative relationship Dr. Christine Pereira Moderate Weak Very weak or None -1.0 to -0.5 ASK at Brunel (2013) 14
  • 15.
    Evaluating Strength. Numerically. Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1. Sign of correlation coefficient Strong Moderate + values 0.5 to 1.0 0.3 to 0.49 -1.0 to -0.5 -0.49 to -0.3 Positive relationship - values Negative relationship Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) Weak Very weak or None 15
  • 16.
    Evaluating Strength. Numerically. Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1. Sign of correlation coefficient Strong Moderate Weak + values 0.5 to 1.0 0.3 to 0.49 0.1 to 0.29 -1.0 to -0.5 -0.49 to -0.3 -0.29 to -0.1 Positive relationship - values Negative relationship Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) Very weak or None 16
  • 17.
    Evaluating Strength. Numerically. Correlation coefficients are between -1 and 1. Sign of correlation coefficient Strong Moderate Weak Very weak or None + values 0.5 to 1.0 0.3 to 0.49 0.1 to 0.29 0 to 0.09 -1.0 to -0.5 -0.49 to -0.3 -0.29 to -0.1 -0.09 to 0 Positive relationship - values Negative relationship  A coefficient of zero means NO relationship. Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 17
  • 18.
    Exercise 2 Match rto the most appropriate scatter plot. Y Y r = -0.9 X r = 0.6 r=0 Y X Y r = -0.5 X Dr. Christine Pereira X ASK at Brunel (2013) 18
  • 19.
    Exercise 3  WhichX is most strongly correlated with Y? r Y Dr. Christine Pereira X1 0.53 X2 -0.62 ASK at Brunel (2013) X3 0.21 X4 0.07 19
  • 20.
    Exercise 3  WhichX is most strongly correlated with Y?  Which X is least correlated with Y? r Y Dr. Christine Pereira X1 0.53 X2 -0.62 ASK at Brunel (2013) X3 0.21 X4 0.07 20
  • 21.
    Exercise 4  WhichX are most strongly correlated? r X1 1 X2 -0.44 1 X3 0.023 -0.71 1 X4 Dr. Christine Pereira X1 X2 0.39 0.52 -.28 ASK at Brunel (2013) X3 X4 1 21
  • 22.
    Exercise 4  WhichX are most strongly correlated?  Which X are least correlated? r X1 1 X2 -0.44 1 X3 0.023 -0.71 1 X4 Dr. Christine Pereira X1 X2 0.39 0.52 -.28 ASK at Brunel (2013) X3 X4 1 22
  • 23.
    Exercise 4  WhichX are most strongly correlated?  Which X are least correlated? r X1 X2 X3 X1 1 X2 -0.44 1 X3 0.023 -0.71 1 X4 0.39 0.52 -.28 X4 1 Why are these correlation coefficients 1? Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 23
  • 24.
    Correlation Coefficients  Measurethe strength of a relationship  They only measure association  They do NOT imply causation! Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 24
  • 25.
    Example 2. Correlation≠ Causation  Which variable is dependent? Independent?  Estimate the strength of the correlation:  Weak, moderate or strong?  Does age cause IQ to increase? Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 25
  • 26.
    Strength vs Significance There are TWO parts to correlations:   Strength – Correlation coefficient Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%) Coefficient Significance Range of values Btwn -1 and +1 Btwn 0 and 1 Purpose How strongly correlated are the two variables Is the observed correlation significant OR has it just occurred by chance? Evaluation Use table to determine if weak, medium or strong Compare to α: If p<α, significant correlation If p>α, non-sig. correlation Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 26
  • 27.
    Strength vs Significance There are TWO parts to correlations:   Strength – Correlation coefficient Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%) Coefficient Significance Range of values Btwn -1 and +1 Btwn 0 and 1 Purpose How strongly correlated are the two variables Is the observed correlation significant OR has it just occurred by chance? Evaluation Use table to determine if weak, medium or strong Compare to α: If p<α, significant correlation If p>α, non-sig. correlation Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 27
  • 28.
    Strength vs Significance There are TWO parts to correlations:   Strength – Correlation coefficient Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%) Coefficient Significance Range of values Btwn -1 and +1 Btwn 0 and 1 Purpose How strongly correlated are the two variables Is the observed correlation significant OR has it just occurred by chance? Evaluation Use table to determine if weak, medium or strong Compare to α: If p<α, significant correlation If p>α, non-sig. correlation Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 28
  • 29.
    Strength vs Significance There are TWO parts to correlations:   Strength – Correlation coefficient Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%) Coefficient Significance Range of values Btwn -1 and +1 Btwn 0 and 1 Purpose How strongly correlated are the two variables Is the observed correlation significant OR has it just occurred by chance? Evaluation Use table to determine if weak, medium or strong Compare to α: If p<α, significant correlation If p>α, non-sig. correlation Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 29
  • 30.
    Strength vs Significance There are TWO parts to correlations:   Strength – Correlation coefficient Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%) Coefficient Significance Range of values Btwn -1 and +1 Btwn 0 and 1 Purpose How strongly correlated are the two variables Is the observed correlation significant OR has it just occurred by chance? Evaluation Use table to determine if weak, medium or strong Compare to α: If p<α, significant correlation If p>α, non-sig. correlation Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 30
  • 31.
    Strength vs Significance There are TWO parts to correlations:   Strength – Correlation coefficient Significance – p-value vs. α (usually 1% or 5%) Coefficient Significance Range of values Btwn -1 and +1 Btwn 0 and 1 Purpose How strongly correlated are the two variables Is the observed correlation significant OR has it just occurred by chance? Evaluation Use table to determine if weak, medium or strong Compare to α: If p<α, significant correlation If p>α, non-sig. correlation Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 31
  • 32.
    Example 4. r Exam % Exam Anxiety Exam% - Exam Anxiety Revision Time -0.441 - .397 -.709 Revision Time - How do we know if the correlation between two variables is significant? Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 32
  • 33.
    Example 4. Letα = 0.05 r Exam % Exam % - Exam Anxiety Revision Time -0.441 .001 Exam Anxiety Revision Time Significance value (p-value) .397 -.709 .062 - .000 p>α H0: Correlation is not statistically significant. p<α H1: Correlation is statistically significant. Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 33
  • 34.
    Example 4. Conclusionfor Anxiety vs Exam %  r = -.441, p = .001 and α = .05  p<α    Reject H0 in favour of H1. There is strong evidence that a statistically significant relationship exists between anxiety and exam score. The relationship between student’s anxiety before an exam is moderately negatively correlated with their exam score. • Negative means higher scores for the IV resulted in lower scores for the DV Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 34
  • 35.
    Dr. Christine Pereira ASKat Brunel (2013) 35
  • 36.
    Levels of Measurement Typesof Data Categorical Scale Qualitative Quantitative Nominal Ordinal (Unranked categories) (Ranked categories)    Marital Status Political Party Eye Color   Satisfaction level Level of agreement Not Grouped       Age in years Time Weight Height No. of cars No. of students  Determines types of correlation coefficients used to analyse your variables. Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 36
  • 37.
    Parametric vs. Non-parametric Parametric data   Usually, we are assuming normally distributed. Typically, scale data are considered parametric ...but this assumption should still be checked.  Non-parametric data    Not assuming that the data is normally distributed All nominal and ordinal data. Sometimes scale data. Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 37
  • 38.
    Relationships/Association Dr. Christine Pereira r= Pearson’s r ρ = Spearman’s rank τ = Kendall’s tau Χ2 = Chi-square test ASK at Brunel (2013) 38
  • 39.
    Relationships/Association Dr. Christine Pereira Example5. Age vs Income ASK at Brunel (2013) 39
  • 40.
    Relationships/Association Dr. Christine Pereira Example5. Age vs Income ASK at Brunel (2013) 40
  • 41.
    Relationships/Association Dr. Christine Pereira Example5. Age vs Income r = Pearson’s r ASK at Brunel (2013) 41
  • 42.
    Relationships/Association Example 6. AgeGroups (3 grps) vs Income Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 42
  • 43.
    Relationships/Association Example 6. AgeGroups (3 grps) vs Income Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 43
  • 44.
    Relationships/Association Example 6. AgeGroups (3 grps) vs Income Dr. Christine Pereira ρ = Spearman’s rank ASK at Brunel (2013) 44
  • 45.
    Relationships/Association Dr. Christine Pereira Whathappens if I end up here?! ASK at Brunel (2013) 45
  • 46.
    Relationships/Association Dr. Christine Pereira Recodeyour scale variable into groups – converting it to an ordinal variable ASK at Brunel (2013) 46
  • 47.
    Relationships/Association Dr. Christine Pereira **useτ instead of ρ if n is small or if the observed count between 2 groups (crosstabs) is small. ASK at Brunel (2013) 47
  • 48.
    Relationships/Association Dr. Christine Pereira EffectSize Phi – 2 x 2 table Cramer’s V – bigger than 2 x 2 table ASK at Brunel (2013) 48
  • 49.
    But which onegives ‘better’ results? Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 49
  • 50.
    But which onegives ‘better’ results?  Do honest research:   Choose the coefficient that is most appropriate for your data! Do not choose the coefficient that gives you ‘better’ results!!  Your aim is accuracy Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 50
  • 51.
    Click here Dr. ChristinePereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 51
  • 52.
    Dr. Christine Pereira ASKat Brunel (2013) 52
  • 53.
    Correlation Coefficients inSPSS  Download and Save EmployeeSurvey.sav from Blackboard.  Under My Organisations select Academic Skills  Open SPSS 20  Open EmployeeSurvey.sav from within SPSS  If you try to open the file first SPSS will crash!! Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 53
  • 54.
    Correlation Coefficients inSPSS Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 54
  • 55.
    Correlation Coefficients inSPSS Variables to be correlated go here Tick the correct correlation coefficient here Puts * when p < 0.05 Puts ** when p < 0.01 Dr. Christine Pereira ASK at Brunel (2013) 55
  • 56.
    Dr. Christine Pereira ASKat Brunel (2013) 56
  • 57.
    Dr. Christine Pereira ASKat Brunel (2013) 57
  • 58.
    Dr. Christine Pereira ASKat Brunel (2013) 61