1. AS Coursework Overall Marks
Name: Sophie Carey
Planning – Comments and mark out of 17/20
For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet
Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 48/60
Footage:
Is appropriate for target audience, fitting genre conventions of sci-fi well. Controlled
use of camera throughout.
Editing:
Edited well, building tension. Good variety of shots used throughout.
Sound:
Good use of diegetic and non-diegetic sound. Good sound mixing though at times
dialogue is lost.
Overall:
An excellent genre piece. Good use of mise-en-scene and locations fit genre
conventions. The titles were in keeping with the genre.
Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 16/20
Q1: PowerPoint/SlideShare
Clear understating of conventions and how they were used in opening to conform
and challenge genre. Audience expectation of genre recognised. References to real
products have been identified.
Q2: Word/SlideShare
Detail on how audience may relate to character age and motivation though not
necessarily the situation. Genre archetypal characteristics/costume/location
addressed. Some attempt to link audience experiences with characters.
Q3: Prezi
Clear understanding of choice of distributor with some reference to
past/contemporary films. Info lacked good in-depth detail or evidence of research.
Q4: PowToon
Some good detail on other interests target audience would enjoy for both genders
but lacks good examples.
Q5: PowToon
Some good reflective analysis of feedback and detail on choices made to attract
audience. Evidence of actual questionnaire has been added.
Q6: emaze
Some detail on different software used in production of product. Some software
(editing) has more reflection. Good detail on camera. Some software mentioned in
logos but no detail.
Q7: Prezi
Detail on how improvement made with editing – transitions/pace, the importance of
2. pre-production and research, lighting a scene appropriately. Detail on what can still
be improved. Evidence included of shots and feedback.
Overall:
A good piece of work, candidate clearly understands genre/conventions/institutions
and audience expectations. Analysis and reflection could have more detail. More
variety in ICT to answer questions.
Total 81/100 Level: Grade: A
