Charlotte Heaps received an overall grade of A for her A2 coursework. She received high marks for her planning, main video task, and two ancillary tasks of creating a digipak and poster. Her video showed good use of shots, editing to match the beat, and a clear narrative. Her digipak and poster creatively used images and fonts that linked to the genre and band. In her evaluation, she provided analysis of how her video and products linked to the genre and audience, and collected some feedback via questionnaire, though more feedback would have strengthened it. Overall her work showed good technical skills, creative linking to the genre, and reflective analysis.

1. A2 Coursework Overall Marks Sheet
Name: Charlotte Heaps
Planning – comments and mark out of 15/20
For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet
Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 33/40
Footage:
Material appropriate to task, with very good variation of shots. Good attention to
MES and performance.
Editing:
Cuts match excellently to beat with appropriate use of transitions. Narrative clear.
Overall:
Student has shown good commitment to task and has produced a good piece of
work that works well with song.
Construction – Ancillary Task 1 (Digipak) comments and mark out of 9/10
Good use of technology and creative use of most of the technical skills. Good use of
images/font - link to genre and band. Strong front cover and good use of image for
CD holder.
Construction – Ancillary Task 1 (Poster) comments and mark out of 9/10
Good use of technology and creative use of most of the technical skills. Good use of
images/font - link to genre and band. Good use of social media icons.
Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 16/20
Q1: Some great analysis of shots/edit pace/location/costume and how they were
used to link to genre and artist. Text contains info though descriptive at times
contains reference on how video conformed or challenged. Good use of Prezi and
links to real products.
Q2: Clear understanding of how products all link with colour scheme and design.
Good detail on how video links to ancillary tasks with good understanding of how
product relationship important to audience. Good links to real products and culture in
genre. Slides to voiceover – Brainshark.
Q3: Feedback collected via questionnaire and viewing of work – video evidence of
viewing and written reflective feedback. Some good analysis of feedback, but could
have been more reflective. Evidence of actual questionnaire would have been good.
Would have been stronger with more feedback from more audience members.
Q4: Good description of tools used to create product –good detail on software. Word

2. doc loaded using Slideshare. Good reflective analysis.
Total 82/100 Level: Grade: A
Date April 2015