Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

As cw overall marksheet cogdell


Published on

As cw overall marksheet

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

As cw overall marksheet cogdell

  1. 1. AS Coursework Overall Marks Name: Aaron Cogdell Planning – Comments and mark out of 17/20 For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 52/60 Footage: Is appropriate for target audience, fitting genre conventions of horror well. Controlled use of camera throughout. Good use of still images. Editing: Edited well, building tension. Good variety of shots used throughout. Sound: Good use of diegetic and non-diegetic sound. Good sound mixing. Godo use pf creepy sound effects. Overall: An excellent genre piece. Excellent use of location and mise-en-scene. Title card could have used more thought. Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 17/20 Q1: Video Very good understating of conventions/technical elements and how they were used in opening to conform to genre. Audience expectation of genre recognised. References to real products have been added. Q2: PowToon Detail on how audience may relate to character age/costume/location and motivation though not necessarily the situation. Some attempt to link audience experiences with characters. Q3: Prezi Good understanding of choice of distributor with some reference to past/contemporary films. Info has good in-depth detail but lacks evidence of research. Good conclusion on choice of distributor. Q4: PowerPoint/SlideShare Good detail on age and narrative conventions target audience would enjoy for both genders, other interests also included. Some assumptions made but no evidence to support statements. Q5: PowerPoint/SlideShare Good detail on how audience was attracted with evidence if it was a success. Some reflective analysis of feedback. Example of questionnaires added. Q6: Prezi Good detail on different software used in production of product. Good reflection on tech used. Some detail on camera.. Q7: Word/SlideShare Detail on how improvement made with editing – transitions/pace, the importance of
  2. 2. pre-production, camerawork. Detail on what can still be improved. Good breakdown of key elements. Overall: A very good piece of work, candidate has good understanding genre/conventions/institutions and audience expectations. Analysis and reflection have good detail. Good variety in ICT to answer questions. Total 86/100 Level: Grade: A