Validity
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
3 likes•227 views
Validity refers to the degree to which a test measures what it claims to measure. There are four main types of validity: face validity, content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity. Face validity is how test takers perceive the test. Content validity refers to how well the content of the test matches the objectives being taught. Criterion validity is the extent of agreement between a test and an external outcome measure. Construct validity is the extent to which a test measures a theoretical concept or construct.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
01 validity and its type
This document discusses the concept of validity in psychological testing and research. It provides definitions of validity from authoritative sources like the American Psychological Association. It distinguishes between different types of validity like construct validity, content validity, criterion validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, and experimental validity, which includes statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, external validity, and ecological validity. The relationships between these types of validity are explored in depth through multiple examples and implications. The document emphasizes that validity concerns the appropriate interpretation and use of test scores rather than a test itself. It is intended as a guide on validity for Dr. GHIAS UL HAQ from SARHAD UNIVERSITY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PESHAWAR.
Validity
This document discusses different types of validity in testing:
1. Content validity refers to how well a test measures the specific construct it aims to assess. A test needs to be related to the relevant class content.
2. Criterion-related validity is the degree of agreement between a test and an independent, reliable standard. There are two types: concurrent and predictive validity.
3. Construct validity provides evidence that test items measure the intended underlying abilities. Think-aloud and retrospection methods can provide evidence of construct validity.
Validity in scoring and face validity are also discussed. To improve validity, test specifications and a representative sample of content should be used, and scoring should directly relate to what
Validity & Reliability
Teachers must ensure that student assessments are valid and reliable to make fair evaluations. Validity refers to how well an assessment measures what it is intended to measure. There are several methods for establishing validity, including face validity which considers readability, content validity which examines how well content matches what is being tested, and construct validity which determines if the test covers the relevant behavior domain. Criterion-related validity compares test scores to external criteria and has two types: predictive validity which indicates how well scores predict future performance, and concurrent validity which shows how closely scores relate to other valid assessment measures.
Test Reliability and Validity
This short SlideShare presentation explores a basic overview of test reliability and test validity. Validity is the degree to which a test measures what it is supposed to measure. Reliability is the degree to which a test consistently measures whatever it measures. Examples are given as well as a slide on considerations for writing test questions that demand higher-order thinking.
Validity, Reliability and Feasibility
This document discusses validity, reliability, and feasibility in data collection. Validity refers to how well a test measures what it intends to measure and includes content, construct, and criterion-related validity. Reliability is the consistency of results and includes test-retest, parallel forms, and split-half reliability. Factors like time interval, test conditions, length, and difficulty influence reliability. A test must be both valid and reliable. Feasibility refers to practical aspects like how easy a test is to design, administer, score, and interpret results.
Meaning and Methods of Estimating Reliability of Test.pptx
This document discusses the meaning and methods of estimating the reliability of tests. It defines reliability as the consistency or stability of test scores. Several methods for estimating reliability are described, including test-retest reliability, alternate forms reliability, and internal consistency reliability using split-half, Cronbach's alpha, and Kuder-Richardson formulas. Factors that influence reliability coefficients are also examined, such as test length, range of scores, and the ability to guess answers correctly.
Test standardization
Standardized tests are designed and administered consistently to allow for comparison of student performance. Tests are given to a sample group to determine average scores and the spread of scores. This establishes norms that individual students can be compared to. There are two main types of standardized tests - norm-referenced tests which compare students to peers, and criterion-referenced tests which assess knowledge of a defined subject area. Tests go through a process of development that includes trying out drafts, analyzing results, revising weak questions, and further testing to establish reliability and validity.
Validity and Reliability
Validity refers to a test accurately measuring what it intends to. Content validity means a test samples relevant skills, while criterion-related validity compares test scores to external criteria. Reliability means a test gives consistent results. Key factors for reliability include multiple test items, clear instructions, uniform administration conditions, and scorer reliability through objective scoring and scorer training. While reliability ensures consistent results, a test may be reliable without being valid if it does not accurately measure the target construct. Both validity and reliability are important for effective test design and interpretation.
Recommended
01 validity and its type
This document discusses the concept of validity in psychological testing and research. It provides definitions of validity from authoritative sources like the American Psychological Association. It distinguishes between different types of validity like construct validity, content validity, criterion validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, and experimental validity, which includes statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, external validity, and ecological validity. The relationships between these types of validity are explored in depth through multiple examples and implications. The document emphasizes that validity concerns the appropriate interpretation and use of test scores rather than a test itself. It is intended as a guide on validity for Dr. GHIAS UL HAQ from SARHAD UNIVERSITY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PESHAWAR.
Validity
This document discusses different types of validity in testing:
1. Content validity refers to how well a test measures the specific construct it aims to assess. A test needs to be related to the relevant class content.
2. Criterion-related validity is the degree of agreement between a test and an independent, reliable standard. There are two types: concurrent and predictive validity.
3. Construct validity provides evidence that test items measure the intended underlying abilities. Think-aloud and retrospection methods can provide evidence of construct validity.
Validity in scoring and face validity are also discussed. To improve validity, test specifications and a representative sample of content should be used, and scoring should directly relate to what
Validity & Reliability
Teachers must ensure that student assessments are valid and reliable to make fair evaluations. Validity refers to how well an assessment measures what it is intended to measure. There are several methods for establishing validity, including face validity which considers readability, content validity which examines how well content matches what is being tested, and construct validity which determines if the test covers the relevant behavior domain. Criterion-related validity compares test scores to external criteria and has two types: predictive validity which indicates how well scores predict future performance, and concurrent validity which shows how closely scores relate to other valid assessment measures.
Test Reliability and Validity
This short SlideShare presentation explores a basic overview of test reliability and test validity. Validity is the degree to which a test measures what it is supposed to measure. Reliability is the degree to which a test consistently measures whatever it measures. Examples are given as well as a slide on considerations for writing test questions that demand higher-order thinking.
Validity, Reliability and Feasibility
This document discusses validity, reliability, and feasibility in data collection. Validity refers to how well a test measures what it intends to measure and includes content, construct, and criterion-related validity. Reliability is the consistency of results and includes test-retest, parallel forms, and split-half reliability. Factors like time interval, test conditions, length, and difficulty influence reliability. A test must be both valid and reliable. Feasibility refers to practical aspects like how easy a test is to design, administer, score, and interpret results.
Meaning and Methods of Estimating Reliability of Test.pptx
This document discusses the meaning and methods of estimating the reliability of tests. It defines reliability as the consistency or stability of test scores. Several methods for estimating reliability are described, including test-retest reliability, alternate forms reliability, and internal consistency reliability using split-half, Cronbach's alpha, and Kuder-Richardson formulas. Factors that influence reliability coefficients are also examined, such as test length, range of scores, and the ability to guess answers correctly.
Test standardization
Standardized tests are designed and administered consistently to allow for comparison of student performance. Tests are given to a sample group to determine average scores and the spread of scores. This establishes norms that individual students can be compared to. There are two main types of standardized tests - norm-referenced tests which compare students to peers, and criterion-referenced tests which assess knowledge of a defined subject area. Tests go through a process of development that includes trying out drafts, analyzing results, revising weak questions, and further testing to establish reliability and validity.
Validity and Reliability
Validity refers to a test accurately measuring what it intends to. Content validity means a test samples relevant skills, while criterion-related validity compares test scores to external criteria. Reliability means a test gives consistent results. Key factors for reliability include multiple test items, clear instructions, uniform administration conditions, and scorer reliability through objective scoring and scorer training. While reliability ensures consistent results, a test may be reliable without being valid if it does not accurately measure the target construct. Both validity and reliability are important for effective test design and interpretation.
Validity in Assessment
It talks about the different types of validity in assessment.
* Face Validity
* Content Validity
* Predictive Validity
* Concurrent Validity
* Construct Validity
What is Reliability and its Types?
Topic: What is Reliability and its Types?
Student Name: Kanwal Naz
Class: B.Ed 1.5
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Correlational research
This document discusses correlational research designs. Correlational studies can show relationships between two variables to indicate cause and effect or predict future outcomes. There are three main types of correlational studies: observational research, survey research, and archival research. Correlational research allows analysis of relationships among many variables and provides correlation coefficients to measure direction and degree of relationships. Interpreting correlations involves scattergrams, correlation coefficients from -1 to 1, and determining explained variance through r-squared values. However, correlation does not necessarily prove causation as third variables could be the true cause.
Presentation Validity & Reliability
The document discusses key qualities of measurement devices: validity, reliability, practicality, and backwash effect. It defines each quality and provides examples. Validity refers to what a test measures, and includes content, construct, criterion-related, concurrent, and predictive validity. Reliability is how consistent measurements are, including equivalency, stability, internal, and inter-rater reliability. Practicality means a test is easy to construct, administer, score and interpret. Backwash effect is a test's influence on teaching and learning.
Reliability
1. Reliability in psychological testing refers to the consistency or accuracy of measurement - the degree to which a test is free from errors of measurement.
2. Several models of reliability are used to evaluate the error associated with administering a test, including test-retest, parallel forms, split-half, Kuder-Richardson, and coefficient alpha methods.
3. The level of reliability considered "high enough" depends on the purpose and use of the test, with clinical settings requiring higher reliability indices greater than .95 compared to basic research where .70-.80 may be sufficient.
Reliability and validity
Test validity refers to validating the appropriate use of a test score for a specific context or purpose. Validity is determined by studying test results in the intended setting of use, as a test may be suitable for one purpose but not another. Validity is a matter of degree rather than an absolute quality, and establishing validity requires empirical evidence and theoretical justification that the intended inferences from test scores are adequate and appropriate.
Validation
This document discusses test validity and its various types. It defines validity as measuring what a test is designed to measure. There are different types of validity evidence including rational, empirical, and construct validity. Internal validity looks at a test's content and effect, while external validity compares test scores to outside criteria. Construct validity determines what test scores represent by comparing them to other data about test takers. Gathering multiple forms of validity evidence establishes that a test is accurately measuring the intended construct. Reliability is necessary for validity, but a test can be reliable without being valid.
Validity.pptx
This document discusses different types of validity in research. It describes content validity, construct validity including convergent and discriminant validity, criterion-related validity including predictive and concurrent validity. It also discusses face validity, internal validity, external validity, and conclusion validity. Specific examples are provided to illustrate each type of validity. The key aspects of validity, such as empirical evidence, ongoing evaluation, and population-specific conclusions, are emphasized.
Validity, Reliability ,Objective & Their Types
The document discusses various aspects of reliability and validity in psychological research. It defines reliability as consistency or repeatability of a measure. Several methods of assessing reliability are described, including test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability (using split-half, Kuder-Richardson, and Cronbach's alpha tests), and parallel-forms reliability. Validity refers to how well a test measures what it is intended to measure. Different types of validity are covered, such as face validity, content validity, criterion-related (predictive and concurrent) validity, and construct validity.
Criteria to Consider when Constructing Good tests
The document discusses criteria for constructing valid and reliable tests. It defines validity as the degree to which a test measures what it intends to measure. Important factors in validity include appropriateness, difficulty level, and construction of test items. Reliability refers to consistency of scores when retaking the same test. Factors like length, difficulty, and objectivity affect reliability. Various methods are provided for establishing validity and reliability statistically, including calculating correlations between tests. Formulas are also presented for computing measures of central tendency, variability, and determining the shape of frequency distributions.
Valiadity and reliability- Language testing
The document discusses test reliability and validity. It defines reliability as the degree to which a test is free from random measurement error, and validity as the degree to which a test measures the intended construct. There are several factors that can affect test reliability and validity, including test method, personal attributes of test takers, and random factors. Reliability is necessary for validity but not sufficient, as validity also requires examining the relationship between test scores and other relevant criteria. The document outlines various approaches for estimating reliability and gathering evidence to support validity.
Validity & reliability seminar
This document discusses validity and reliability in research. It defines validity as the extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure. Reliability is defined as the extent to which a test shows consistent results on repeated trials. The document then discusses various types of validity including content, face, criterion-related, construct, and ecological validity. It also discusses types of reliability including equivalency, stability, internal consistency, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability. Factors affecting validity and reliability are presented along with how validity and reliability are related concepts in research.
Reliability
Topic: Reliability
Student Name: Sarang Joyo
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Presentation validity
This document discusses the concept of validity in psychological testing. It defines validity as the degree to which a test measures what it claims to measure. There are three main types of validity: content validity, which concerns how well a test represents the content area it aims to measure; criterion-related validity, which compares test scores to external criteria; and construct validity, which evaluates how well a test measures hypothetical constructs. Validity is influenced by factors like test length and the range of abilities in the sample population. A test must demonstrate validity to ensure the inferences made from its results are appropriate and meaningful.
Construct Validity
Construct validity assesses how accurately theories and ideas have been translated into procedures and measures. It is established by defining terms, proving control over variables, and supporting theory with empirical evidence. Content validity ensures test items adequately represent the domain being measured. It is achieved through thorough literature review, constructing procedures accordingly, and expert evaluation. Both validity types are important for drawing conclusive results from studies, though establishing validity can be challenging for complex studies with many interacting variables.
Hypothesis
Hypothesis is a tentative statement which prove or disprove by valide and reliable data. It helps researchers to focus and give direction.
Qualities of a Good Test
This document discusses the key characteristics of a good measuring instrument or test, including validity, reliability, objectivity, norms, and usability. It defines validity as the accuracy with which a test measures what it claims to measure, and describes different types of validity including content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. Reliability is defined as the consistency of measurement and different methods for estimating reliability are outlined. Objectivity refers to eliminating personal bias from scoring. Norms provide average scores for comparison. Usability factors like ease of administration, timing, cost, and scoring are also addressed.
RELIABILITY IN LANGUAGE TESTING-TITIN'S GROUP
This document discusses test reliability and the various methods used to measure reliability, including test-retest, parallel forms, split-half, and internal consistency. It provides details on each method and explains that reliability is a measure of how consistent the results are under consistent conditions. The goal of estimating reliability is to determine how much variability in scores is due to errors and how much is due to true differences in the people taking the test. Factors like the performance of candidates, reliability of scoring, number of items, characteristics of test-takers, and time between tests can all impact reliability.
Validity of a Research Tool
It is a Presentation on the Meaning, types, methods of establishing validity, the factors influencing validity and how to increase the validity of a tool
Reliablity
Reliability refers to a test's ability to consistently produce similar results regardless of when it is administered. A reliable test's scores will not fluctuate based on irrelevant factors like a test-taker's mood or environmental conditions during testing. Reliability is measured through coefficients ranging from 0 to 1, with higher numbers indicating greater reliability. Tests can be made more reliable by including more questions, ensuring questions are independent, providing clear instructions, and using objective scoring methods like multiple choice. While reliability ensures consistent results, a test may still lack validity if it does not accurately measure the intended construct.
Assessment of learning 1
This document discusses key concepts related to assessment of learning. It defines assessment, measurement, evaluation and testing. It outlines different modes of assessment including traditional, performance, and portfolio assessments. It also discusses types of assessment processes such as diagnostic, formative and summative assessments. Principles of quality assessment are outlined including clarity, appropriateness, validity, reliability, fairness, and practicality. Different methods of developing tests are also discussed such as identifying objectives, determining test type, constructing items, and validating tests.
Testing
The document discusses principles of testing including practicality, reliability, validity, authenticity, and backwash. It provides details on how to ensure tests are practical, reliable, valid, and authentic. Reliability can be impacted by student factors, raters, test administration conditions, and test design. Validity includes content, criterion-related, and construct validity. Authenticity means the test tasks correspond to real-world language tasks. Backwash refers to how a test impacts teaching and learning - a test should support good teaching and provide feedback to improve teaching.
More Related Content
What's hot
Validity in Assessment
It talks about the different types of validity in assessment.
* Face Validity
* Content Validity
* Predictive Validity
* Concurrent Validity
* Construct Validity
What is Reliability and its Types?
Topic: What is Reliability and its Types?
Student Name: Kanwal Naz
Class: B.Ed 1.5
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Correlational research
This document discusses correlational research designs. Correlational studies can show relationships between two variables to indicate cause and effect or predict future outcomes. There are three main types of correlational studies: observational research, survey research, and archival research. Correlational research allows analysis of relationships among many variables and provides correlation coefficients to measure direction and degree of relationships. Interpreting correlations involves scattergrams, correlation coefficients from -1 to 1, and determining explained variance through r-squared values. However, correlation does not necessarily prove causation as third variables could be the true cause.
Presentation Validity & Reliability
The document discusses key qualities of measurement devices: validity, reliability, practicality, and backwash effect. It defines each quality and provides examples. Validity refers to what a test measures, and includes content, construct, criterion-related, concurrent, and predictive validity. Reliability is how consistent measurements are, including equivalency, stability, internal, and inter-rater reliability. Practicality means a test is easy to construct, administer, score and interpret. Backwash effect is a test's influence on teaching and learning.
Reliability
1. Reliability in psychological testing refers to the consistency or accuracy of measurement - the degree to which a test is free from errors of measurement.
2. Several models of reliability are used to evaluate the error associated with administering a test, including test-retest, parallel forms, split-half, Kuder-Richardson, and coefficient alpha methods.
3. The level of reliability considered "high enough" depends on the purpose and use of the test, with clinical settings requiring higher reliability indices greater than .95 compared to basic research where .70-.80 may be sufficient.
Reliability and validity
Test validity refers to validating the appropriate use of a test score for a specific context or purpose. Validity is determined by studying test results in the intended setting of use, as a test may be suitable for one purpose but not another. Validity is a matter of degree rather than an absolute quality, and establishing validity requires empirical evidence and theoretical justification that the intended inferences from test scores are adequate and appropriate.
Validation
This document discusses test validity and its various types. It defines validity as measuring what a test is designed to measure. There are different types of validity evidence including rational, empirical, and construct validity. Internal validity looks at a test's content and effect, while external validity compares test scores to outside criteria. Construct validity determines what test scores represent by comparing them to other data about test takers. Gathering multiple forms of validity evidence establishes that a test is accurately measuring the intended construct. Reliability is necessary for validity, but a test can be reliable without being valid.
Validity.pptx
This document discusses different types of validity in research. It describes content validity, construct validity including convergent and discriminant validity, criterion-related validity including predictive and concurrent validity. It also discusses face validity, internal validity, external validity, and conclusion validity. Specific examples are provided to illustrate each type of validity. The key aspects of validity, such as empirical evidence, ongoing evaluation, and population-specific conclusions, are emphasized.
Validity, Reliability ,Objective & Their Types
The document discusses various aspects of reliability and validity in psychological research. It defines reliability as consistency or repeatability of a measure. Several methods of assessing reliability are described, including test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability (using split-half, Kuder-Richardson, and Cronbach's alpha tests), and parallel-forms reliability. Validity refers to how well a test measures what it is intended to measure. Different types of validity are covered, such as face validity, content validity, criterion-related (predictive and concurrent) validity, and construct validity.
Criteria to Consider when Constructing Good tests
The document discusses criteria for constructing valid and reliable tests. It defines validity as the degree to which a test measures what it intends to measure. Important factors in validity include appropriateness, difficulty level, and construction of test items. Reliability refers to consistency of scores when retaking the same test. Factors like length, difficulty, and objectivity affect reliability. Various methods are provided for establishing validity and reliability statistically, including calculating correlations between tests. Formulas are also presented for computing measures of central tendency, variability, and determining the shape of frequency distributions.
Valiadity and reliability- Language testing
The document discusses test reliability and validity. It defines reliability as the degree to which a test is free from random measurement error, and validity as the degree to which a test measures the intended construct. There are several factors that can affect test reliability and validity, including test method, personal attributes of test takers, and random factors. Reliability is necessary for validity but not sufficient, as validity also requires examining the relationship between test scores and other relevant criteria. The document outlines various approaches for estimating reliability and gathering evidence to support validity.
Validity & reliability seminar
This document discusses validity and reliability in research. It defines validity as the extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure. Reliability is defined as the extent to which a test shows consistent results on repeated trials. The document then discusses various types of validity including content, face, criterion-related, construct, and ecological validity. It also discusses types of reliability including equivalency, stability, internal consistency, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability. Factors affecting validity and reliability are presented along with how validity and reliability are related concepts in research.
Reliability
Topic: Reliability
Student Name: Sarang Joyo
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Presentation validity
This document discusses the concept of validity in psychological testing. It defines validity as the degree to which a test measures what it claims to measure. There are three main types of validity: content validity, which concerns how well a test represents the content area it aims to measure; criterion-related validity, which compares test scores to external criteria; and construct validity, which evaluates how well a test measures hypothetical constructs. Validity is influenced by factors like test length and the range of abilities in the sample population. A test must demonstrate validity to ensure the inferences made from its results are appropriate and meaningful.
Construct Validity
Construct validity assesses how accurately theories and ideas have been translated into procedures and measures. It is established by defining terms, proving control over variables, and supporting theory with empirical evidence. Content validity ensures test items adequately represent the domain being measured. It is achieved through thorough literature review, constructing procedures accordingly, and expert evaluation. Both validity types are important for drawing conclusive results from studies, though establishing validity can be challenging for complex studies with many interacting variables.
Hypothesis
Hypothesis is a tentative statement which prove or disprove by valide and reliable data. It helps researchers to focus and give direction.
Qualities of a Good Test
This document discusses the key characteristics of a good measuring instrument or test, including validity, reliability, objectivity, norms, and usability. It defines validity as the accuracy with which a test measures what it claims to measure, and describes different types of validity including content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. Reliability is defined as the consistency of measurement and different methods for estimating reliability are outlined. Objectivity refers to eliminating personal bias from scoring. Norms provide average scores for comparison. Usability factors like ease of administration, timing, cost, and scoring are also addressed.
RELIABILITY IN LANGUAGE TESTING-TITIN'S GROUP
This document discusses test reliability and the various methods used to measure reliability, including test-retest, parallel forms, split-half, and internal consistency. It provides details on each method and explains that reliability is a measure of how consistent the results are under consistent conditions. The goal of estimating reliability is to determine how much variability in scores is due to errors and how much is due to true differences in the people taking the test. Factors like the performance of candidates, reliability of scoring, number of items, characteristics of test-takers, and time between tests can all impact reliability.
Validity of a Research Tool
It is a Presentation on the Meaning, types, methods of establishing validity, the factors influencing validity and how to increase the validity of a tool
Reliablity
Reliability refers to a test's ability to consistently produce similar results regardless of when it is administered. A reliable test's scores will not fluctuate based on irrelevant factors like a test-taker's mood or environmental conditions during testing. Reliability is measured through coefficients ranging from 0 to 1, with higher numbers indicating greater reliability. Tests can be made more reliable by including more questions, ensuring questions are independent, providing clear instructions, and using objective scoring methods like multiple choice. While reliability ensures consistent results, a test may still lack validity if it does not accurately measure the intended construct.
What's hot (20)
Similar to Validity
Assessment of learning 1
This document discusses key concepts related to assessment of learning. It defines assessment, measurement, evaluation and testing. It outlines different modes of assessment including traditional, performance, and portfolio assessments. It also discusses types of assessment processes such as diagnostic, formative and summative assessments. Principles of quality assessment are outlined including clarity, appropriateness, validity, reliability, fairness, and practicality. Different methods of developing tests are also discussed such as identifying objectives, determining test type, constructing items, and validating tests.
Testing
The document discusses principles of testing including practicality, reliability, validity, authenticity, and backwash. It provides details on how to ensure tests are practical, reliable, valid, and authentic. Reliability can be impacted by student factors, raters, test administration conditions, and test design. Validity includes content, criterion-related, and construct validity. Authenticity means the test tasks correspond to real-world language tasks. Backwash refers to how a test impacts teaching and learning - a test should support good teaching and provide feedback to improve teaching.
Construction of Tests
Meaning, characteristics, objectivity, validity, reliability, usability, norms, construction of tests.
Standardized and non standardized tests
Standardized and non-standardized tests are used to assess students. [1] Standardized tests are administered uniformly with set procedures for scoring and interpretation, while non-standardized tests do not have uniform procedures. [2] For accurate measurement, tests must be valid, reliable, and usable to provide dependable results. [3] Different types of tests include essay tests which allow freedom of response and evaluate complex learning outcomes.
Assessment in Learning
This document discusses assessment in learning and various types of tests used to evaluate student learning. It describes different ways to classify tests, such as oral versus written tests, and objective versus subjective tests. The document outlines the key characteristics of formative, summative, diagnostic, and standardized tests. It also discusses important criteria for developing good tests, such as validity, reliability, and objectivity. Different scoring methods and statistical measures used to analyze test results are presented, such as frequency distributions and measures of central tendency like the mean.
Standardized and non standardized tests (1)
This document discusses standardized and non-standardized tests. Standardized tests are administered and scored in a consistent manner to all test takers. They are developed by test specialists and allow for comparison of performance between individuals. Non-standardized tests focus on a student's attainment at a point in time and are often teacher-made. The document outlines key characteristics of good tests such as reliability, validity, cost, time, acceptability, objectivity, and usability. It also discusses norms, which provide a standard of comparison for test results.
Assessment of Learning
This document discusses assessment of learning and provides information on different types of tests used to evaluate student learning. It defines key terms related to assessment such as measurement, evaluation, formative and summative tests. The document also outlines classifications of tests, criteria for developing good exams, considerations in test construction, and pointers for constructing and scoring different types of tests such as recall, recognition, true-false and essay questions.
Assessment of-learning-ppt
This document discusses various concepts related to educational measurement and testing. It defines key terms like measurement, evaluation, tests, validity, reliability, and different types of tests. It provides details on constructing objective tests, including writing test items, establishing test validity and reliability, and interpreting test scores. It also discusses advantages and disadvantages of objective and essay tests. Additionally, it covers topics like measures of central tendency, frequency distributions, and calculating the mean, median and mode.
OBJECTIVITY OF TESTS ppt.pptx
This presentation is about the objectivity of tests, It presents the definition of objective tests, and its meaning.
It reflects upon the objectivity of scoring, types of objective tests, merits and demerits about the same.
Assessment of learning
This document discusses various topics related to assessment of learning, including the key differences between measurement, evaluation, and testing. It also covers different types of tests such as subjective/essay tests, objective tests, teacher-made tests, diagnostic tests, formative tests, and summative tests. The document provides information on standardized tests, norms, criterion-referenced measures, and norm-referenced measures. It discusses important criteria for good examinations like validity, reliability, and objectivity. It also outlines the stages of test construction and major considerations when preparing a test.
Standardized and non standardized tests
Here are three examples of standardized tests:
1. SAT (Scholastic Assessment Test) - A standardized test widely used for college admissions in the United States. It is administered by the College Board and measures skills in math, reading, and writing.
2. ACT (American College Testing) - Another standardized test used for college admissions in the US. It measures skills in English, math, reading, and science.
3. TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language) - A standardized test to measure the English language ability of non-native speakers wishing to enroll in English-language institutions. It measures reading, listening, speaking, and writing skills.
Pencil andpapertest
This document discusses guidelines for constructing classroom tests. It outlines the basic principles that should guide teachers, such as measuring all instructional objectives and using appropriate test items. It also describes the attributes of a good test, including validity, reliability, objectivity, and fairness. The document provides steps for constructing classroom tests, such as identifying objectives, preparing a table of specifications, writing test items, and sequencing items. It includes an example of how to prepare a table of specifications and allocate test items to topics. Finally, it lists general guidelines for writing test items, such as avoiding ambiguity and providing one correct answer.
Identifying Test Objective (Assessment of Learning) - CES report 011114
This document discusses different types of tests used to assess student learning. It describes single-subject tests that evaluate individual subjects like math or language. It also discusses multi-subject standardized tests that measure learning across subjects based on grade-level norms. Another section covers alternative assessments like projects and portfolios that are designed by teachers. The document provides details on achievement tests, norm-referenced tests, criterion-referenced tests, and other test formats, purposes, and categories. It outlines characteristics of written tests using various question types as well as non-written tests involving physical performance.
Issues regarding construction of exams
This document discusses key considerations for constructing effective exams, including practicality, norm-referenced vs criterion-referenced approaches, reliability, validity, and fairness. It emphasizes that exams must be practical given constraints like time, cost and administration logistics. They should reliably and validly measure the intended objectives, whether ranking students against peers or assessing specific lesson criteria. Fairness ensures all students have equal opportunity to demonstrate knowledge regardless of background. The goal is for assessments to accurately reflect what was taught without unintended biases.
Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention
This document discusses evaluation in the instructional design process. It defines assessment, measurement, and evaluation, and explains the purpose and goals of learner evaluation. The development of learner evaluations involves examining instructional goals and objectives to determine the intended change and criteria for success. Validity and reliability are also important concepts. Evaluations can be criterion-referenced or norm-referenced. The document provides guidelines for developing various assessment techniques, including objective test items, observations, portfolios, and rubrics. Formative and summative evaluation are described as important types for gathering feedback and determining effectiveness. The role of the instructional designer is to plan and implement efficient and effective evaluations.
Properties of Assessment Methods
The document discusses the important properties of assessment methods that teachers should consider, including validity, reliability, fairness, practicality, and ethics. Validity refers to how appropriate and meaningful the assessment conclusions are, and can be established through content, face, criterion-related, and construct validity. Reliability means the consistency of assessment results and can be measured through stability, internal consistency, and test-retest methods. Fairness means students understand expectations and the assessment supports learning. Practicality means the method is implementable without being too complex or time-consuming. Ethics requires consent and avoiding sensitive personal topics.
Principles of Language Assessment.Activity 1.
Principles of Language Assessment. Learning_activity1_Sarco.Tipan_Hilda.Marlene.pptx
Assessment oflearning ppt
This document discusses assessment of learning and various testing methods. It describes different types of tests such as objective, essay, and standardized tests. It covers test construction including writing test items, establishing validity and reliability. Scoring methods and statistical tools for interpreting test results like frequency distributions are also outlined. The purpose of assessment is to improve the teaching and learning process through measuring student outcomes.
seminaronstanderdizedtest-171225110527.pdf
This document provides an overview of standardized and non-standardized tests. It defines standardized tests as those with uniform administration and scoring to allow for comparison. Examples include achievement, IQ, and aptitude tests. Non-standardized tests are constructed by teachers and vary in their administration. The document discusses the construction, uses, and limitations of different types of test items for standardized and non-standardized tests such as essay, short answer, multiple choice, and matching questions. Rating scales and checklists are also covered as methods for assessment.
Similar to Validity (20)
Identifying Test Objective (Assessment of Learning) - CES report 011114
Identifying Test Objective (Assessment of Learning) - CES report 011114
Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention
Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention
More from RedPaspas
Train
The document discusses tax reforms proposed under the TRAIN (Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion) program. It proposes lowering personal income tax for 83% of taxpayers by exempting those earning below 250,000 PHP and lowering rates for others. It also aims to simplify estate and donor taxes by imposing a single 6% tax rate. The VAT base will be expanded by limiting exemptions but protecting necessities, while the threshold is raised to 3 million PHP. Fuel and automobile excise taxes will be increased gradually, and a new tax on sugar-sweetened beverages is introduced to promote health.
Property & Supply Management
The document outlines the major functions and responsibilities of a property and supply division, including preparing procurement requests, accepting deliveries, issuing supplies, and maintaining inventory records. It also describes key processes like inspections to ensure items meet specifications before acceptance, as well as procedures for storage, issuance, and recording of inventory. Public officials are responsible for properly managing and safeguarding all government resources in accordance with applicable laws and regulations to ensure efficiency and accountability.
Friedrich schleiermacher
Friedrich Schleiermacher discusses different methods of translation in his 1813 treatise. He acknowledges that translation is difficult due to conceptual differences between languages. Specifically, attempting to reproduce an alien concept's meaning through paraphrase can undermine the original intention. Schleiermacher argues that due to a language's plasticity, a translator can bend the target language's concepts and usages to bring readers closer to the author's conceptual world, rather than distorting the author's ideas to fit the readers' language. The key is for the translation to communicate an impression of the original's linguistic-conceptual system as much as possible.
Conceptualizing a hermeneutic model
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
On the different methods of translation
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Qualitative and quantitative research
This document provides an overview of qualitative and quantitative research methods. It discusses the differences between quantitative and qualitative methodologies, including their deductive vs. inductive processes and predetermined vs. emerging design approaches. It also contrasts quantitative and qualitative data collection methods and types of analysis. The document then covers key aspects of research including definitions, characteristics, ethics, and different research designs such as experimental, descriptive, and historical. It provides examples of specific descriptive research methods like case studies, surveys, and developmental studies.
Percentage grading
This document discusses different grading systems including pass/fail, standard letter grades, and narrative grading. It outlines advantages and disadvantages of each system. Advantages of pass/fail grading include being less emotional for younger students and encouraging risk-taking. However, pass/fail does not provide much information about a student's achievement levels. Standard letter grades clearly articulate learning skills but can promote competition over cooperation. Narrative grading allows students and parents to understand strengths and weaknesses but requires time to implement changes. Overall, the document presents tradeoffs of different grading approaches.
Types of grading system
This document discusses several methods of grading student performance:
- Percentage grading based on exams and assignments
- Letter grading using a scale like A-F with possible plus/minus modifiers
- Norm-referenced grading comparing students to each other using letter grades
- Mastery grading where students must reach a specified level of attainment to pass
- Pass/fail grading with two levels of pass or fail
- Standards-based grading comparing performance to established content standards
It also discusses narrative grading using written comments instead of or in addition to scores or letters.
Grading and reporting
This document discusses the various types of grading and reporting systems and provides guidelines for their effective use to communicate student progress and achievement to students, parents, and administrators in a brief and understandable manner. The goals of grading and reporting systems are to clarify instructional objectives for students, show strengths and weaknesses, provide social development information, enhance student motivation, inform areas where teaching can be improved, and help with student promotion, graduation, honors, counseling and reporting to other schools or employers.
Erin gruwell
Erin Gruwell began her teaching career at a diverse but troubled high school. One of her students drew a racist cartoon, prompting Gruwell to seize a teachable moment by taking her class to see Schindler's List. This outing and Gruwell's efforts to connect with her students led to death threats. However, it also led to opportunities like meeting the author and director who created Schindler's List. Despite facing opposition, Gruwell looped with her students and helped them connect to literature while supporting them through their personal struggles.
Greece
The document provides information on various aspects of Greek culture, including religion, dance, festivals, mythology, and gods and goddesses. It discusses how Greek Orthodox Christianity is the dominant religion in Greece. It also summarizes different Greek dances and traditional festivals. Key myths are summarized at a high level, such as the Trojan War and the Titans. Finally, it lists and briefly describes the major Olympian gods and goddesses in Greek mythology.
21 characteristics of a 21 st century teachers
The document outlines 21 characteristics of 21st century teachers: they should focus on students' perspectives; rethink how lessons are interpreted; and engage students through dialogue, questioning, and facilitating learning as opposed to direct instruction. Additionally, teachers should incorporate real-world examples; encourage student contributions, participation in conferences, use of technology; and having students create media, websites, and get involved in their community. Finally, teachers should help students discern good information, see different perspectives, ask and entertain all questions, flip the classroom, document learning, and find new ways to relate to their students.
Assignment
1) The document discusses several philosophical theories including linguistic philosophy, constructivism, essentialism, existentialism, perennialism, and behaviorism.
2) It provides descriptions of each theory, explaining their key concepts and methodology. For example, it states that constructivism is a learning theory where people produce knowledge based on experiences.
3) The document also includes sections on the philosophy of language, linguistics, essentialism in gender, and behaviorism's proposition that behavior can be understood without inner mental states. It aims to define and compare different philosophical perspectives.
Teaching as your vocation, mission and profession
Teaching is described as a vocation, mission, and profession. As a vocation, it is a calling from God or other divine entity that one responds to by becoming a teacher. A mission refers to the task or assignment given to teach. Teaching requires long preparation to develop the skills needed to effectively serve students, as excellence, not mediocrity, should be the goal of any profession.
Influence of media technology
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
The teacher as curriculum
The document discusses the various stakeholders involved in curriculum development and implementation. It identifies the primary stakeholders as learners/students, whose characteristics and needs should be considered. It also describes the important roles of teachers in developing, delivering, and shaping the curriculum to meet learner needs. School administrators are identified as responsible for overseeing curriculum implementation and the overall school vision. Other stakeholders mentioned are parents, community members, professional organizations, and the government agencies that regulate education standards.
The roles of stakeholders in curriculum implementation 2
The document discusses the various stakeholders involved in curriculum implementation, including:
1. Learners, who are the primary stakeholders as the curriculum directly influences them. Their characteristics like age, gender, and interests must be considered.
2. Teachers, who play a key role in planning, writing, and delivering the curriculum through lesson plans and activities. They must address learners' goals and needs.
3. Curriculum managers and administrators, who oversee implementation, select teachers, and ensure schools have resources to effectively learn. They are concerned with the curriculum offered.
Implementing the curriculum
Stakeholders play important roles in curriculum implementation. The primary stakeholders are learners, as the curriculum is developed for and influences them. Teachers are also key stakeholders as they develop and implement the curriculum. Curriculum managers and administrators supervise the implementation process. Parents support the curriculum both within the school and at home, such as through parent associations and by serving as resource speakers. Government bodies like DepEd and CHED oversee curriculum implementation at different education levels.
Implementing the curriculum the teacher as curriculum implementer and manager
Teachers play a primary role in implementing curriculum as curriculum makers. They develop lessons, units, and plans that address student needs and interests. Teachers design, enrich, and modify curriculum to suit different learners. Students view teachers as crucial for shaping the school curriculum through the experiences and resources they provide. While technology can support teachers, it cannot replace the complex, multifaceted role teachers play. School administrators also help shape curriculum as managers who oversee its implementation and ensure continuity and balance across grade levels.
What is stakeholders??
Stakeholders are individuals or institutions that are interested in and help shape the implementation of a school's curriculum. They put the curriculum into action and give it life by helping determine how the curriculum is carried out. Stakeholders have an interest in the activities of schools and their curriculums.
More from RedPaspas (20)
The roles of stakeholders in curriculum implementation 2
The roles of stakeholders in curriculum implementation 2
Implementing the curriculum the teacher as curriculum implementer and manager
Implementing the curriculum the teacher as curriculum implementer and manager
Recently uploaded
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Information and Communication Technology in Education
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 2)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐂𝐓 𝐢𝐧 𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:
Students will be able to explain the role and impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in education. They will understand how ICT tools, such as computers, the internet, and educational software, enhance learning and teaching processes. By exploring various ICT applications, students will recognize how these technologies facilitate access to information, improve communication, support collaboration, and enable personalized learning experiences.
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐭:
-Students will be able to discuss what constitutes reliable sources on the internet. They will learn to identify key characteristics of trustworthy information, such as credibility, accuracy, and authority. By examining different types of online sources, students will develop skills to evaluate the reliability of websites and content, ensuring they can distinguish between reputable information and misinformation.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Brand Guideline of Bashundhara A4 Paper - 2024
It outlines the basic identity elements such as symbol, logotype, colors, and typefaces. It provides examples of applying the identity to materials like letterhead, business cards, reports, folders, and websites.
How to Download & Install Module From the Odoo App Store in Odoo 17
Custom modules offer the flexibility to extend Odoo's capabilities, address unique requirements, and optimize workflows to align seamlessly with your organization's processes. By leveraging custom modules, businesses can unlock greater efficiency, productivity, and innovation, empowering them to stay competitive in today's dynamic market landscape. In this tutorial, we'll guide you step by step on how to easily download and install modules from the Odoo App Store.
欧洲杯下注-欧洲杯下注押注官网-欧洲杯下注押注网站|【网址🎉ac44.net🎉】
【网址🎉ac44.net🎉】欧洲杯下注在体育博彩方面，不难发现，欧洲杯下注多为英式运动提供投注。欧洲杯下注为丰富多彩的体育项目提供投注，如足球、赛马、板球和飞镖，但这不是欧洲杯下注的唯一优势。在欧洲杯下注，全世界玩家都可以找到自己感兴趣的比赛进行投注。欧洲杯下注为网球和美式运动如棒球、美式足球、篮球、冰球开出的投注同样值得关注。在夏季或冬季奥运会方面，欧洲杯下注为玩家开出了丰富多彩的服务，是你的不二之选。你还可以投注水球、自行车和班迪球等小众体育项目，甚至可以为武术、拳击和综合格斗投注。欧洲杯下注为众多体育项目开出滚球投注。
skeleton System.pdf (skeleton system wow)
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qspvswamcohjtbvbbhjad04lg65waylfINTRODUCTION TO HOSPITALS & AND ITS ORGANIZATION
The document discuss about the hospitals and it's organization .
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Educational Technology in the Health Sciences
Plenary presentation at the NTTC Inter-university Workshop, 18 June 2024, Manila Prince Hotel.
How to Setup Default Value for a Field in Odoo 17
In Odoo, we can set a default value for a field during the creation of a record for a model. We have many methods in odoo for setting a default value to the field.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
IT WILL BE HELPFULL FOR THE NUSING STUDENTS
IT FOCUSED ON MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND NURSING MANAGEMENT.
HIGHLIGHTS ON HEALTH EDUCATION.
Recently uploaded (20)
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Information and Communication Technology in Education
Information and Communication Technology in Education
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
How to Download & Install Module From the Odoo App Store in Odoo 17
How to Download & Install Module From the Odoo App Store in Odoo 17
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
Validity
- 1. Latin word “validus” which means strong. is the degree to which a test measure what is supposed to measure.
- 2. FACE CONTENT CRITERION CONSTRUCT
- 3. ◦Researcher simply taking the validity of the test at face value by looking at whether a test appears to measure the target variable. ◦-Refers to how test takers perceive the attractiveness, appropriateness of a test.
- 4. If test takers consider the test to have face validity, they may offer a more conscientious effort to complete the test. If a test does not have face validity they might hurry through a test and take it less seriously.
- 5. -The extent to which the content of the test matches the instructional objectives/the outward appearance. Non statistical type of validity.
- 6. 1.)Do students have adequate experience with the type of task posed by the item. 2.)Did the teacher cover sufficient material for most students to be able to answer the item correctly? 3.)Does the item reflect the degree of emphasis received during the instruction? EX: Achievement test
- 7. ◦-The extent to which scores on the test are in agreement with a valid test as an external criterion
- 8. 1.)Concurrent validity Occurs when the criterion measure are obtained at the same time as the test scores Ex: If the end of the year math test in 4th grade correlate highly with the statewide math tests, they would have high concurrent validity.
- 9. Occurs when the criterion measures are obtained at a time after the test Ex: Career, aptitude test, which helpful in determining who is likely to succeed or fail in certain subjects or occupation.
- 10. ◦ -The extent to which an assessment corresponds to other variables, as predicted by some rational theory. ◦ Ex: Intelligence test Gravity-we cannot see gravity, but we can see what we assume to be its results a falling apples.