Class 2
VISUAL ATTENTION
Class 4.1
Observing and Describing
agenda 9.13.16
questions about quiz?
survey (5 questions)
“It’s personal.”
Brandywine River Museum
Chadds Ford, PA
Located Along the
Brandywine River
Interior
galleries
Andrew Wyeth
Maga’s Daughter
Tempera on panel
27 ½ x 31 inches
1966
Finding out more is a great
thing to do.
But NO Amount of
Information will answer all
your questions.
AndrewWyeth,
IndianSummer
1970
temperaonpanel,
42x35inches
Caspar David FRIEDRICH, Seashore in Fog, c. 1807
Picasso
Ma Jolie
1912
There are as many flavors
of art as there are people
who make it.
New flavors are being
created all the time.
You get to pick your
favorites.
The point is to give it a try and see
which kinds you think are especially
great. Then experience to the fullest
and enjoy.
Hint:You might like them all.
Morris Louis, Tet, 1958, synthetic polymer paint on canvas, 95 x 153 in, WMAA
Olafur Eliasson, Your strange certainty still kept, 1996
Water, strobelight, plexiglass, recirculating pump, foil and wood
Base 20 x 204 3/4 x 10 inches
Top 173 1/4 inches long
Bruce Nauman, Self-Portrait as Fountain, 1970, c-print, 20 x 24 inches
Nam June Paik, Magnet TV, 1965, 17-inch black-and-white television set with
magnet, 28 3/8 × 19 1/4 × 24 1/2 in.
Duane Hanson, Woman with Dog, 1977.
Cast polyvinyl polychromed in synthetic polymer, with cloth and hair
46 × 48 × 51 ½ in
Charles Ray
Puzzle Bottle
1995
painted wood, glass, cork, 13 3/8 x
3 3/4 dia
Joseph Kosuth, FiveWords in Green Neon, 1965,
neon tubing, 62 x 80 x 6 in
Brice Marden, SummerTable, 1972–73.
Oil and wax on canvas in three parts, 60 × 105 5/16 in.
Doug Aitken, Untitled (Shopping Cart), 2000.
Chromogenic print mounted on plexiglass, 48 5/8 × 56 5/8 in
Jean-Michel Basquiat, “LNAPRK”, 1982.
Synthetic polymer and oil stick on canvas, 73 1/2 × 72 1/4 in
Catherine Opie, Self-Portrait, 1993
chromogenic print, 39 5/8 × 29 15/16 in
You’re allowed to—
supposed to!—respond
personally to artwork.
The artist wants you to have an experience—an emotional,
physical, spiritual, intellectual, moral (some combination
of these or all of them) experience of the work.
If you like a work of art,
you’ll often want to find
out more about it.
That’s great, find out more, it will enrich your experience of the work, no
doubt about it. But there is no “final correct answer” to the meaning of a
given work.There are more and less satisfying interpretations, more and
less sensitive readings, but no single reading is ultimately correct.
Like your parents probably told
you, “How do you know you don’t
like it if you won’t even try it?
This class gives you a chance to try out different kinds of art.
There’s no obligation to like the things that I, or your classmates, like.
Pick your own likes and dislikes.
However, you can learn from—even come to appreciate—works you don’t
particularly care for.
SO, HOW DO WE EXPERIENCE
ART TO THE FULLEST?
So, How do we experience art to
the fullest?
 One way we try to experience art more fully is
by understanding how it creates the effects it
has on us.
So, How do we experience art to
the fullest?
 One way we try to experience art more fully is
by understanding how it creates the effects it
has on us.
 Experience, with your eyes, mind, feelings,
memories, body.What does this piece do to
me?
 Examples: Does it make me happy?
Uncomfortable? Sad? Upset? Does it turn my
stomach? Does it make me shiver?Worry? Sweat?
EXPERIENCING THE EFFECTS
 1. Experience comes first. What do you SEE and
how does it make you FEEL in your bones.
 At this point, it doesn’t matter who made it,
when, or why.The point is to try to figure out, as
completely as possible, the effect the work is
having on you.
 So let’s sum this up as “experiencing the effects”
of the work.This process can take a while. It is
not necessarily simple. In fact, one definition of
art could be work that takes the viewer some
time and trouble to experience.
Accounting for the Effects
 2. Now that you have a handle on what you’ve
experienced, you want to know how the piece
made you feel that way. Cf. driving a car to
looking under the hood.
 This is where formal analysis can be helpful.
 How did this piece make me feel (x, y, and z)
way? How is it structured to achieve those
specific effects?
 This is where purely personal, idiosyncratic
responses can be weeded out if you are writing
to share with an audience.
Effects 1
Bruce Nauman
Hanging Heads #2, 1989, wax and wire
two heads, the first is 10 3/4 x 9 1/2 x 7 ¾, the second is slightly
smaller, both suspended approx 6' above the floor
WayneThiebaud, Cakes, 1963

UVC100_FALL16_CLASS4.1

  • 1.
    Class 2 VISUAL ATTENTION Class4.1 Observing and Describing
  • 2.
    agenda 9.13.16 questions aboutquiz? survey (5 questions)
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Andrew Wyeth Maga’s Daughter Temperaon panel 27 ½ x 31 inches 1966
  • 10.
    Finding out moreis a great thing to do. But NO Amount of Information will answer all your questions.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Caspar David FRIEDRICH,Seashore in Fog, c. 1807
  • 13.
  • 14.
    There are asmany flavors of art as there are people who make it. New flavors are being created all the time. You get to pick your favorites.
  • 15.
    The point isto give it a try and see which kinds you think are especially great. Then experience to the fullest and enjoy. Hint:You might like them all.
  • 16.
    Morris Louis, Tet,1958, synthetic polymer paint on canvas, 95 x 153 in, WMAA
  • 17.
    Olafur Eliasson, Yourstrange certainty still kept, 1996 Water, strobelight, plexiglass, recirculating pump, foil and wood Base 20 x 204 3/4 x 10 inches Top 173 1/4 inches long
  • 18.
    Bruce Nauman, Self-Portraitas Fountain, 1970, c-print, 20 x 24 inches
  • 19.
    Nam June Paik,Magnet TV, 1965, 17-inch black-and-white television set with magnet, 28 3/8 × 19 1/4 × 24 1/2 in.
  • 20.
    Duane Hanson, Womanwith Dog, 1977. Cast polyvinyl polychromed in synthetic polymer, with cloth and hair 46 × 48 × 51 ½ in
  • 21.
    Charles Ray Puzzle Bottle 1995 paintedwood, glass, cork, 13 3/8 x 3 3/4 dia
  • 22.
    Joseph Kosuth, FiveWordsin Green Neon, 1965, neon tubing, 62 x 80 x 6 in
  • 23.
    Brice Marden, SummerTable,1972–73. Oil and wax on canvas in three parts, 60 × 105 5/16 in.
  • 24.
    Doug Aitken, Untitled(Shopping Cart), 2000. Chromogenic print mounted on plexiglass, 48 5/8 × 56 5/8 in
  • 25.
    Jean-Michel Basquiat, “LNAPRK”,1982. Synthetic polymer and oil stick on canvas, 73 1/2 × 72 1/4 in
  • 26.
    Catherine Opie, Self-Portrait,1993 chromogenic print, 39 5/8 × 29 15/16 in
  • 27.
    You’re allowed to— supposedto!—respond personally to artwork. The artist wants you to have an experience—an emotional, physical, spiritual, intellectual, moral (some combination of these or all of them) experience of the work.
  • 28.
    If you likea work of art, you’ll often want to find out more about it. That’s great, find out more, it will enrich your experience of the work, no doubt about it. But there is no “final correct answer” to the meaning of a given work.There are more and less satisfying interpretations, more and less sensitive readings, but no single reading is ultimately correct.
  • 29.
    Like your parentsprobably told you, “How do you know you don’t like it if you won’t even try it? This class gives you a chance to try out different kinds of art. There’s no obligation to like the things that I, or your classmates, like. Pick your own likes and dislikes. However, you can learn from—even come to appreciate—works you don’t particularly care for.
  • 30.
    SO, HOW DOWE EXPERIENCE ART TO THE FULLEST?
  • 31.
    So, How dowe experience art to the fullest?  One way we try to experience art more fully is by understanding how it creates the effects it has on us.
  • 32.
    So, How dowe experience art to the fullest?  One way we try to experience art more fully is by understanding how it creates the effects it has on us.  Experience, with your eyes, mind, feelings, memories, body.What does this piece do to me?  Examples: Does it make me happy? Uncomfortable? Sad? Upset? Does it turn my stomach? Does it make me shiver?Worry? Sweat?
  • 33.
    EXPERIENCING THE EFFECTS 1. Experience comes first. What do you SEE and how does it make you FEEL in your bones.  At this point, it doesn’t matter who made it, when, or why.The point is to try to figure out, as completely as possible, the effect the work is having on you.  So let’s sum this up as “experiencing the effects” of the work.This process can take a while. It is not necessarily simple. In fact, one definition of art could be work that takes the viewer some time and trouble to experience.
  • 34.
    Accounting for theEffects  2. Now that you have a handle on what you’ve experienced, you want to know how the piece made you feel that way. Cf. driving a car to looking under the hood.  This is where formal analysis can be helpful.  How did this piece make me feel (x, y, and z) way? How is it structured to achieve those specific effects?  This is where purely personal, idiosyncratic responses can be weeded out if you are writing to share with an audience.
  • 35.
    Effects 1 Bruce Nauman HangingHeads #2, 1989, wax and wire two heads, the first is 10 3/4 x 9 1/2 x 7 ¾, the second is slightly smaller, both suspended approx 6' above the floor
  • 36.

Editor's Notes

  • #5 Find some things you like, and enjoy them.
  • #15 Seriously. There’s art made out of chocolate, art made out of steel, art made out of cardboard boxes, ribbons, toy airplanes; if you can imagine it, an artist has probably used it in their work.
  • #28 Find some things you like, and enjoy them.
  • #30 Seriously. There’s art made out of chocolate, art made out of steel, art made out of cardboard boxes, ribbons, toy airplanes; if you can imagine it, an artist has probably used it in their work.