Ace Maths Unit Three: Teaching Through Problem Solving (pdf)PiLNAfrica
In this unit, the shift from the rule-based, teaching by telling approach to a problem-solving approach to mathematics teaching is explained and illustrated with numerous mathematics examples.
MATHEMATICS and How to Develop Interest in Maths?Shahaziya Ummer
Meaning of Mathematics, Definition of Mathematics, Nature of mathematics, Need and significance of learning Mathematics, How to develop and maintain interest in mathematics?,
A study on “changing students attitude towards learning mathematics”Dr. C.V. Suresh Babu
International Conference on Integration of STEAM in School Education organised by NCERT, Regional Institute of Education, Bhopal, MP, India in collaboration with Department of School Education, Government of Madhya Pradesh on February, 25th- 28, 2021
Ace Maths Unit Three: Teaching Through Problem Solving (pdf)PiLNAfrica
In this unit, the shift from the rule-based, teaching by telling approach to a problem-solving approach to mathematics teaching is explained and illustrated with numerous mathematics examples.
MATHEMATICS and How to Develop Interest in Maths?Shahaziya Ummer
Meaning of Mathematics, Definition of Mathematics, Nature of mathematics, Need and significance of learning Mathematics, How to develop and maintain interest in mathematics?,
A study on “changing students attitude towards learning mathematics”Dr. C.V. Suresh Babu
International Conference on Integration of STEAM in School Education organised by NCERT, Regional Institute of Education, Bhopal, MP, India in collaboration with Department of School Education, Government of Madhya Pradesh on February, 25th- 28, 2021
21st Century Skills & TPACK (Workshop)Petra Fisser
Tijdens een conferentie van de Poolse Centre for education development gaf Petra Fisser een workshop over competenties die leraren nodig hebben om hun leerlingen voor te bereiden op leren en werken in de 21e eeuw, waarbij een belangrijke rol is weggelegd voor de integratie van ict in het onderwijs. Daarbij werden 21st century skills gekoppeld aan het TPACK model.
Symposium on TPACK at SITE 2014
TPACK is recognized by many as a useful conceptual framework to help define the knowledge base teachers’ need to know to effectively integrate technology in their educational practice. However, determining whether teachers indeed have developed the knowledge and skills required for effective technology integration – or in short whether they have developed TPACK – is a much more complicated issue. This symposium discusses how artifacts are being used in assessing pre-service and practicing teachers technology integration competencies. TPACK calls for coherence between content, pedagogy and technology. The assumption is that having TPACK also implies teachers’ being able to demonstrate technology integration competencies. This assumption implies a fit between (pre-service) teachers’ TPACK (often measured through self-report instruments) and the artifacts they produce.
In this symposium we discuss how different kinds of artifacts, e.g. lesson plans and lesson practice as demonstrated in video clips can be used as an indicator of a teacher’s technology integration competencies. In this symposium we discuss different artifacts (pre-service) teachers produce in order to demonstrate that they have TPACK. In the symposium different artifacts will be discussed, such as lesson plans and video clips that show technology use in classroom practice. The symposium deals with the potential and restrictions of artifacts as indicator for technology integration, the assessment of artifacts and the relation with other TPACK measures, such as the TPACK survey from Schmidt et al. (2010). Examples from different educational contexts will be presented and discussed.
Technology, Pedagogy And Content Knowledgeteacherlara247
This is an interactive training in TPACK (technology, pedagogy and content knowledge: Mishra and Koehler, 2006) I did for a local university faculty retreat.
Also within are links to Karl Fleisch\'s "Did You Know?" versions from teachertube.
This presentation focuses on technology integration and the effective use of the ET in DoDEA classes based on a framework created by Punya Mishra and Michael Koehler of Michigan State University.
Determining practicing and prospective teachers’ self-efficacy in TPACK in the science domain
Petra Fisser, Joke Voogt, Bart Ormel, Chantal Velthuis & Jo Tondeur, University of Twente, The Netherlands, Edith Stein University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands, University of Ghent, Belgium
Teachers’ beliefs, practices and attitudes are important for understanding and improving educational processes, because they are closely linked to teachers’ challenges in their daily professional life. Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977) seems to play a major role in this. In this study we look at teachers' self-efficacy towards the domain of science education and towards technology integration in this domain. Since most students who enter pre-service elementary school training in the Netherlands graduated from secondary school without science-related courses, many lack any foundational science knowledge. This contributes to their (absence of) confidence to teach science, and it also delimits their science-teaching related PCK. In a recent study Fisser, Ormel and Velthuis (submitted) measured teachers' beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy in relation to science education in primary education, based on a Dutch version of the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument (STEBI) (Riggs & Enochs, 1990). The results for the pre-service teachers showed that the more pre-service teachers have the opportunity to experience actual teaching in the science domain, the higher the sense of self-efficacy is. Combining science education with technology integration offers even more challenges for teachers. Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy towards technology integration will be done by using a Dutch version of the TPACK survey (Schmidt et al., 2009). This survey will be complimented with the STEBI survey and, because the TPACK survey does not take into account teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards technology, questions related to the attitude of teachers towards using technology in education will be added. The combined TPACK-STEBI survey will be distributed to Dutch pre-service primary education students and the results will be presented at the SITE symposium.
With every new iteration of technology, we create generations of students whose primary media "language" for learning and interacting with the world is different than the generation before it. In the last five years, technologies like online homework, free online videos, personalized learning software, mobile devices, learning analytics, high-quality digital math games, computational knowledge engines have been chipping away at the corners of education and traditional teaching. Technology-enhanced learning is here to stay and it will alter the face of education, like it or not. This is a guide to navigating and thriving in this new world.
The aim of the study is to develop an understanding of the kinds and sources errors and misconceptions that characterise students’ learning of school algebra. Systematic random sampling was used to draw sixty-five participants from a population of two hundred and twenty-three form three students. A cross sectional survey design was employed to collect data using written tests, a structured questionnaire and interviewing of the students from one high school in Zimbabwe. Content analysis technique was applied to textual data from three sources in order to determine the types of errors and misconceptions. The main findings are that both procedural and conceptual errors were prevalent that errors and misconceptions can be explained in terms of the students’ limited understanding of the nature of algebra; in particular their fragile grasp of the notion of a variable. Sources of misconceptions could be explained in terms of the abstract nature of algebra Mathematics educators should embrace errors and misconceptions in their teaching and should not regard them as obstacles to learning but rather engage with them for better understanding of algebraic concepts by students. Future studies can be carried on systematic errors as one of the ways of improving students’ understanding school mathematics.
Is your CEO or CFO asking Treasury and FP&A to drive better business decisions? SynFinyadvisors shared this presentation at the SW Ohio AFP meeting in April 2015. The presentation focused on how Treasury and FP&A are impacted by technology, how they can share data and create insights, and a historical perspective using the Russian ruble crisis of 1998. Hope it helps!
21st Century Skills & TPACK (Workshop)Petra Fisser
Tijdens een conferentie van de Poolse Centre for education development gaf Petra Fisser een workshop over competenties die leraren nodig hebben om hun leerlingen voor te bereiden op leren en werken in de 21e eeuw, waarbij een belangrijke rol is weggelegd voor de integratie van ict in het onderwijs. Daarbij werden 21st century skills gekoppeld aan het TPACK model.
Symposium on TPACK at SITE 2014
TPACK is recognized by many as a useful conceptual framework to help define the knowledge base teachers’ need to know to effectively integrate technology in their educational practice. However, determining whether teachers indeed have developed the knowledge and skills required for effective technology integration – or in short whether they have developed TPACK – is a much more complicated issue. This symposium discusses how artifacts are being used in assessing pre-service and practicing teachers technology integration competencies. TPACK calls for coherence between content, pedagogy and technology. The assumption is that having TPACK also implies teachers’ being able to demonstrate technology integration competencies. This assumption implies a fit between (pre-service) teachers’ TPACK (often measured through self-report instruments) and the artifacts they produce.
In this symposium we discuss how different kinds of artifacts, e.g. lesson plans and lesson practice as demonstrated in video clips can be used as an indicator of a teacher’s technology integration competencies. In this symposium we discuss different artifacts (pre-service) teachers produce in order to demonstrate that they have TPACK. In the symposium different artifacts will be discussed, such as lesson plans and video clips that show technology use in classroom practice. The symposium deals with the potential and restrictions of artifacts as indicator for technology integration, the assessment of artifacts and the relation with other TPACK measures, such as the TPACK survey from Schmidt et al. (2010). Examples from different educational contexts will be presented and discussed.
Technology, Pedagogy And Content Knowledgeteacherlara247
This is an interactive training in TPACK (technology, pedagogy and content knowledge: Mishra and Koehler, 2006) I did for a local university faculty retreat.
Also within are links to Karl Fleisch\'s "Did You Know?" versions from teachertube.
This presentation focuses on technology integration and the effective use of the ET in DoDEA classes based on a framework created by Punya Mishra and Michael Koehler of Michigan State University.
Determining practicing and prospective teachers’ self-efficacy in TPACK in the science domain
Petra Fisser, Joke Voogt, Bart Ormel, Chantal Velthuis & Jo Tondeur, University of Twente, The Netherlands, Edith Stein University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands, University of Ghent, Belgium
Teachers’ beliefs, practices and attitudes are important for understanding and improving educational processes, because they are closely linked to teachers’ challenges in their daily professional life. Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977) seems to play a major role in this. In this study we look at teachers' self-efficacy towards the domain of science education and towards technology integration in this domain. Since most students who enter pre-service elementary school training in the Netherlands graduated from secondary school without science-related courses, many lack any foundational science knowledge. This contributes to their (absence of) confidence to teach science, and it also delimits their science-teaching related PCK. In a recent study Fisser, Ormel and Velthuis (submitted) measured teachers' beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy in relation to science education in primary education, based on a Dutch version of the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument (STEBI) (Riggs & Enochs, 1990). The results for the pre-service teachers showed that the more pre-service teachers have the opportunity to experience actual teaching in the science domain, the higher the sense of self-efficacy is. Combining science education with technology integration offers even more challenges for teachers. Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy towards technology integration will be done by using a Dutch version of the TPACK survey (Schmidt et al., 2009). This survey will be complimented with the STEBI survey and, because the TPACK survey does not take into account teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards technology, questions related to the attitude of teachers towards using technology in education will be added. The combined TPACK-STEBI survey will be distributed to Dutch pre-service primary education students and the results will be presented at the SITE symposium.
With every new iteration of technology, we create generations of students whose primary media "language" for learning and interacting with the world is different than the generation before it. In the last five years, technologies like online homework, free online videos, personalized learning software, mobile devices, learning analytics, high-quality digital math games, computational knowledge engines have been chipping away at the corners of education and traditional teaching. Technology-enhanced learning is here to stay and it will alter the face of education, like it or not. This is a guide to navigating and thriving in this new world.
The aim of the study is to develop an understanding of the kinds and sources errors and misconceptions that characterise students’ learning of school algebra. Systematic random sampling was used to draw sixty-five participants from a population of two hundred and twenty-three form three students. A cross sectional survey design was employed to collect data using written tests, a structured questionnaire and interviewing of the students from one high school in Zimbabwe. Content analysis technique was applied to textual data from three sources in order to determine the types of errors and misconceptions. The main findings are that both procedural and conceptual errors were prevalent that errors and misconceptions can be explained in terms of the students’ limited understanding of the nature of algebra; in particular their fragile grasp of the notion of a variable. Sources of misconceptions could be explained in terms of the abstract nature of algebra Mathematics educators should embrace errors and misconceptions in their teaching and should not regard them as obstacles to learning but rather engage with them for better understanding of algebraic concepts by students. Future studies can be carried on systematic errors as one of the ways of improving students’ understanding school mathematics.
Is your CEO or CFO asking Treasury and FP&A to drive better business decisions? SynFinyadvisors shared this presentation at the SW Ohio AFP meeting in April 2015. The presentation focused on how Treasury and FP&A are impacted by technology, how they can share data and create insights, and a historical perspective using the Russian ruble crisis of 1998. Hope it helps!
This APQC Finance webinar is focused on “The Importance of FP&A Process Design”.
The webinar is targeted to the Finance organization but also benefits any other functions directly or indirectly engaged in the Financial Planning and Analysis process.
The purpose of the webinar is to explain the most common mistakes in FP&A process design, recommend approaches to address them, and the value created once fully implemented by a company.
There are a number of common mistakes which impact FP&A Process Design:
Implementing FP&A Tools instead of Process - Most companies immediately look to replace costly systems when a financial planning issue arises versus focusing on the real root causes. The root cause typically has little to do with the systems and more to do with a work process, organization design, or company culture.
Not understanding the full End to End FP&A Process - There is a common belief in Finance Leadership that work process does not apply to their area of planning. The end to end understanding of work process is necessary for accounting or manufacturing but not FP&A. In fact,
Finance Leaders view FP&A work processes as a reduction in intellectual freedom and negatively impacting management flexibility. This viewpoint is pervasive in the organization (from CFO on down).
By focusing first on end to end FP&A Process, and then systems, a company realizes value in:
Significantly improved stewardship – The organization will have a full view of the financial planning process. This enables management to quickly intervene when trends or results are inconsistent with strategies or commitments.
Productivity in excess of industry standards (+1% to +3%) – The redesign of the process will highlight unnecessary steps, which drives productivity and delivers SG&A savings.
Reduce the time required to develop financial plans (2X to 5X faster) – The development of detailed, process maps will reduce the amount of time required to create the financial plans.
Avoid overspending on FP&A projects (~15% to 25% of spending) – When work process is created prior to or during a system implementation there is a significantly higher success rate. This will inevitably reduce overspends on system projects.
Higher quality financial plans – The end to end process design ensures all functions understand their respective contribution. This improved understanding creates higher quality financial data.
AES encryption on modern consumer architecturesGrigore Lupescu
Specialized cryptographic processors target professional applications and offer both low latency and high throughput at the expense of cost. At the consumer level, a modern SoC embodies several accelerators and vector extensions (e.g. SSE, AES-NI), having a high degree of programmability through multiple APIs (OpenMP, OpenCL, etc). This work explains how a modern x86 system that encompasses several compute architectures (MIMD/SIMD) might perform well compared to a specialized cryptographic unit at the fraction of the cost. The analyzed algorithm is AES (AES-128, AES-256) and the mode of operation is ECB. The initial test system is built around SoC AMD A6 5400K (CPU + integrated GPU), coupled with a discrete GPU – AMD R7 250. Benchmark results compare CPU OpenSSL execution (no AES-NI), CPU AES-NI acceleration, integrated GPU, discrete GPU and heterogeneous combinations of the above processing units. Multiple test results are presented and inconsistencies are explained. Finally based on initial results a system composed only of low-end and low power consumer components is designed, built and tested.
FP&A sits at the core of corporate finance. That includes strategy, planning, forecasting, and analysis, where everyone from financial analysts to the CFOs themselves make their biggest impact and drive the business. It simply makes sense to be as automated and efficient (linear) as possible, minimizing time spent on data gathering and dissemination and maximum time spent where it counts – thinking about how we make the business better.
This webinar will lay out the case for fully leveraging technology in your FP&A organization and processes, with a focus on strategies, best practices and real-world examples. This will be brought to you by Jeff Wuest, a former global finance leader at Procter and Gamble.
This webinar will also include a demonstration of how the right technology can help shift your workload from collecting and consolidating data to delivering insights for business growth.
Endorsement of Technology in Mathematics: Secondary Educational Perspectiveinventy
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year. It is an online as well as print version open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as: civil, mechanical, chemical, electronic and computer engineering as well as production and information technology. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published by rapid process within 20 days after acceptance and peer review process takes only 7 days. All articles published in Research Inventy will be peer-reviewed.
The study aims to develop a valid, practical and effective Biology student’s book based on Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) on the topic of biotechnology for Grade XII. The method applied for the study was research and development with the 4-D model. The subjects were 58 Grade XII students of SMAN 1 Muncar, Banyuwangi-Indonesia. The results showed that the average of validation result of STEM-based student’s book was 86.4% which fell under a strong valid category. The average percentage of legibility test and practicality were in very good category of 87.18% and 96.53%, respectively. Meanwhile, the average of effectiveness test was 0.77 of normalized gain categorized in high criteria. In conclusion, it could be determined that STEM-based student’s book of biotechnology is valid, pratical, and effectively used in learning process.
A visit to local Math Museum: Using tablets creatively in classroomNikolaos Manaras
Tablets with their simple interface, portability, speed, affordability and their variety of apps are quickly moving into schools across Europe and a growing number of teachers are experimenting with tablets or are interested in doing so. In the context of monitoring the MOOC “Creative use of Tablets in Schools” provided by the European Schoolnet Academy, the final activity was to create a lesson or a project plan. To design the lesson plan we used a very nice tool called the “Learning
Designer” which was developed by the London Institute of Education. According the Scenario student will visit the local Math Museum during Mathematical Week and create Augmented Reality posters for the school. From the implementation of this scenario students will come in contact with the beauty of mathematics, its history and get to know great mathematicians and their works.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Theoetical base of mathematics education
1. THEOETICAL BASE OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION - II
ASSIGNMENT
Topic: man maid resources- mathematics laboratories
DEEPA. J
13303008
2. INTRODUCTION
Mathematics involves thinking logically and reasonably so as to understand
how formulae are derived and their applications. In order to enhance learners’
mastery and meaningful learning of mathematics, it is necessary to reduce to the
bearable minimum its level of abstraction with the use of instructional materials.
Adenegan(2010) testified to this that instructional materials, when properly used
in the teaching and learning situation, can supply concrete bases for conceptual
thinking, high degree of interest for students in making learning more permanent.
According to Oyekan (2000), “instructional materials are those things that
can facilitate effective teaching and pleasant learning that is teaching aids
through which learning process may be encouraged and motivated under the
classroom situation”. These enhance the teaching learning process when
adequately and appropriately used.
This assignment focuses on setting mathematics laboratory which directly
houses instructional materials. Specifically, this is aims at defining a mathematics
laboratory, listing and identifying mathematical equipment/materials that can be
put in a mathematics laboratory and enumerating ways of setting mathematics
laboratory in the school.
The Mathematics Laboratory
As defined by Adenegan (2003), the mathematics laboratory is a unique
room or place, with relevant and up-to-date equipment known as instructional
materials, designated for the teaching and learning of mathematics and other
scientific or research work, whereby a trained and professionally qualified person
(mathematics teacher) readily interact with learners (students) on specified set of
instructions. The picture below is an example of a mathematics laboratory where
the children are seen playing with educational toys under the supervision of their
teacher.
The materials or equipment that can be found in the mathematics
laboratory include, among others constructed (wooden/metal/plastic made)
mathematical sets, charts and pictures, computer(s), computer software, audio-visual
instructional materials such as projector, electronic starboard, radio,
television set, tape recorder, video tape, etc, solid shapes (real or model), bulletin
board, three-dimensional aids, filmstrips, tape photographs, portable board or
whiteboard, abacus, cardboards, tape measure, graphics, workbooks, graphs,
flannel boards, flash cards, etc.
3. Mathematics laboratory is relatively new in the teaching and learning of
mathematics. It is a practical oriented classroom or place where materials useful
for the effective teaching and learning of mathematics are kept. It is the latest
design to make mathematics real. The term “laboratory method” is commonly
used today to refer to an approach to teaching and learning of mathematics
which provides opportunity to the learners to abstract mathematical ideas
through their own experiences, that is to relate symbol to realities. It is
uncommon in our schools today possibly as a result of lack of fund or the absence
of any government policy on the provision of such laboratory facilities. In short, its
non-existence in our schools is one of the major contributory factors to mass
failure in mathematics. Thus, as highlighted by Adenegan (2003), the functions of
mathematics laboratory include the followings:
1. Permitting students to learn abstract concepts through concrete
experiences and thus increase their understanding of those ideas.
2. Enabling students to personally experience the joy of discovering principles
and relationships.
3. Arousing interest and motivating learning.
4. Cultivating favorable attitudes towards mathematics.
5. Enriching and varying instructions.
6. Encouraging and developing creative problems solving ability.
7. Allowing for individual differences in manner and speed at which students
learn.
8. Making students to see the origin of mathematical ideas and participating
in “mathematics in the making”
Mathematics laboratory is activity centered and a child is placed in
problem solving situation through self exploration and discovery. He provides a
solution based on his experience, needs and interest. Some of the ways in which a
mathematics laboratory can contribute to the learning of the subject are.
1. It provides an opportunity to understand and internalize the basic
mathematical concepts through concrete objects and situations.
2. It enables the students to verify or discover several geometrical properties
and facts using models or by paper cutting and folding technique.
3. It helps the students to build interest and confidence in learning the
subject.
4. 4. The laboratory provides opportunity to exhibit the relatedness of
mathematical concepts with everyday life.
5. It provides greater scope for individual participation in the process of
learning and becoming autonomous learners.
6. It provides scope for greater involvement of both the mind and the hand
which facilitate cognition.
7. The laboratory allows and encourages students to think, discuss with each
other and the teacher and assimilates the concepts in a more effective
manner.
8. It enables the teacher to demonstrate, explain and reinforce abstract
mathematical ideas by using concrete objects, models, charts, graphs,
pictures, posters etc.
THE OBJECTIVES OF MATHEMATICS LABORATORY
1. To provide readily accessible rich manipulative materials to emphasis on
“learning by doing”.
2. To develop an attitude of enquiry.
3. Remove the weakness of present day mathematics education.
4. To develop much needed confidence in students.
5. To generate interest in the subject.
6. To make the students divergent thinkers.
7. To make the children to look for pattern and ask questions.