This document discusses how teaching math may change by 2020, focusing on the roles of technology and teachers. It suggests that (1) learning math will become a team effort with technology as one member, providing personalized and adaptive learning. (2) Teachers will shift from instructors to learning coaches, challenging and encouraging students. (3) Issues with devices and assessment will be solved to allow seamless blending of in-person and digital learning. The role of teachers remains important as human connections and coaching are needed, but technology can handle repetitive tasks and information transfer.

1. What does
teaching math
look like in 2020?
Maria H. Andersen, Ph.D.
Director of Learning & Innovation
Area9 Labs
[a guide for K-12 educators]

14. HungryFish

15. Algeboats

16. Dragonbox

22. Before we can understand the
future of math teaching, we
need to experience a bit of a
paradigm shift.

23. Do you think you
know what reading
looks like?

24. Go watch a Spritz demo.

25. Just because we’re
used to it, this does not
mean it is “the way.”

26. Text on paper is
just a technology.

27. Features of Text
- ability to review
- one-to-many
- asynchronous
- can be translated
- cheaper than lecture

28. Lecture is just a
technology.

29. Features of Lecture
- one-to-many
- synchronous
- Q&A
- child care

30. Learning that involves information transfer
will be replaced by technology.

31. Any repetitive assessment or
learning task that can be replaced by
a computer will be.

32. Will teachers
be replaced by
technology?

33. The “teacher replacement” view is
a look at the world through
Silicon-Valley tinted glasses…

34. Or maybe it’s the
Lake Wobegon of Silicon Valley…
Where all the learners are motivated,
everyone has Internet, and the only
thing standing between a student and
their success is affordable access.

35. Killer Features of Teachers
- creative
- flexible
- motivating
- coaching
- synchronous
- Q&A
- child care

36. Many math teachers say that what
they do in the classroom cannot be
mimicked by technology. They say the
classroom is highly interactive and
engaging for all the students.
But what does the research say?

37. Math classroom mapping research
from Vilma Mesa,
University of Michigan
Warning: These will haunt you.

42. The classroom is highly interactive for
the teacher and engaging for all the
about 3 students.

43. Killer Feature of Tutor
= Teacher but one-to-one

44. Bloom 2-sigma Study (1985)
The average student tutored one-to-one
using mastery learning techniques
performed two standard deviations
better than students who learn via
conventional instructional methods.

45. For any topic, there’s a field of potential
questions, identification of misconceptions, and
learning assets that a tutor could provide.

46. Some students already know it.
Get them to the next topic quickly.

47. For students who don’t have initial knowledge,
each one may take a different path. That’s fine.

48. Other students take a circuitous route.
That’s okay too.

49. The only technology that will improve
learning outcomes for the majority of
students in math is that the technology
that begins to mimic a tutor-student
relationship.

50. So, Math Teaching in 2020 …

51. (1) Learning math becomes a team
activity, where technology is one of the
team members.

52. Good math technology
Adaptive experience
Instant feedback
Competency tracking
Exploration spaces
Provide scaffolding
Alternate learning paths

53. (2) Teachers shift
from the role of an
instructor to the role
of a learning coach.

54. Good coaches
Communicating
Questioning
Challenging
Accountability
Encouraging
Showing new perspectives
Monitoring

55. (3) We solve the
mobile devices and
assessment problem.

56. (4) Students can move
seamlessly between
in-person and digital
experiences.

57. Seamless transitions
Absences
Sports conflicts
Extra help
Summer programs
Interventions
Online students
Help for parents

58. (5) Teacher planning
periods shift from
lesson planning to
examining analytics and
choosing digital / in-
person learning
activities.

59. “Anyone that can be replaced by a
computer should be.”
- Arthur C. Clarke

60. No matter how good the software,
learners will still need the the coach,
because we/they are human.
It is the connection with a learning
community that keeps most of us
moving forward in education.

61. Stop wasting time doing
things that a computer
(or robot) can do better.

62. Now we take
some questions.
Contact info:
maria@area9.dk
busynessgirl@gmail.com
Twitter: @busynessgirl
busynessgirl.com
Illustrations by Mat Moore.