This document discusses scientific misconduct and defines key related terms. It begins by defining science and scientific conduct, noting science involves establishing cause and effect relationships through logic. Scientific conduct requires objectivity, impartiality, willingness to change beliefs based on evidence, verification of findings, and precision. The document then defines scientific misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism, noting these behaviors violate ethical standards and risk one's career. Several common types of misconduct are outlined, including falsification of data. Key organizations that define misconduct are also mentioned.
One of the most important research ethical issues that should be taken into consideration is “scientific misconduct” such as fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. Plagiarism can occur at any stage of the research activities such as reporting, communicating, authoring, and peer review. The purpose of this workshop is to engage researchers in their responsibility to conduct an ethical research.
Intellectual Honesty and Research Integrity.pptxsheelu57
Intellectual honesty is an applied method of problem solving, characterized by an unbiased, honest attitude, which can be demonstrated in a number of different ways including:
Ensuring support for chosen ideologies does not interfere with the pursuit of truth;
Relevant facts and information are not purposefully omitted even when such things may contradict one's hypothesis;
Facts are presented in an unbiased manner, and not twisted to give misleading impressions or to support one view over another;
References, or earlier work, are acknowledged where possible, and plagiarism is avoided. practices.
For individuals, research integrity is an aspect of moral character and experience. It involves above all a commitment to intellectual honesty and personal responsibility for one's actions and to a range of practices that characterize responsible research conduct.
Redundant, Duplicate and Repetitive publications are the most important concerns in the scientific research/literature writing. The occurrence of redundancy affects the concepts of science/literature and carries with it sanctions of consequences. To define this issue is much challenging because of the many varieties in which one can slice, reformat, or reproduce material from an already published study. This issue also goes beyond the duplication of a single study because it might possible that the same or similar data can be published in the early, middle, and later stages of an on-going study. This may have a damaging impact on the scientific study/literature base. Similar to slicing a cake, there are so many ways of representing a study or a set of data/information. We can slice a cake into different shapes like squares, triangles, rounds, or layers. Which of these might be the best way to slice a cake? Unfortunately, this may be the wrong question. The point is that the cake that is being referred to, the data/ information set or the study/findings, should not be sliced at all. Instead, the study should be presented as a whole to the readership to ensure the integrity of science/technology because of the impact that may have on patients who will be affected by the information contained in the literature/findings. Redundant, duplicate, or repetitive publications occur when there is representation of two or more studies, data sets, or publications in either electronic or print media. The publications can overlap partially or completely, such that a similar portion, major component(s), or complete representation of a previously/simultaneous ly or future published study is duplicated.
SALAMI SLICING: The slicing of research publication that would form one meaningful paper into several different papers is known as salami publication or salami slicing. Unlike duplicate publication, which involves reporting the exact same data in two or more publications, salami slicing involves breaking up or segmenting a large study into two or more publications. These segments are called slices of a study. As a general rule, as long as the slices of a broken-up study share the same hypotheses, population, and methods, this is not acceptable in general practice. The same slice should never be published more than once at all. According to the United States Office of Research Integrity (USORI), salami slicing can result in a distortion of the literature/findings by leading unsuspecting readers to believe that data presented in each salami slice (journal article) is derived from a different subject sample/source. Somehow this practice not only skews the scientific database but it creates repetition to waste reader's time as well as the time of editors and peer reviewers, who must also handle each paper separately.
One of the most important research ethical issues that should be taken into consideration is “scientific misconduct” such as fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. Plagiarism can occur at any stage of the research activities such as reporting, communicating, authoring, and peer review. The purpose of this workshop is to engage researchers in their responsibility to conduct an ethical research.
Intellectual Honesty and Research Integrity.pptxsheelu57
Intellectual honesty is an applied method of problem solving, characterized by an unbiased, honest attitude, which can be demonstrated in a number of different ways including:
Ensuring support for chosen ideologies does not interfere with the pursuit of truth;
Relevant facts and information are not purposefully omitted even when such things may contradict one's hypothesis;
Facts are presented in an unbiased manner, and not twisted to give misleading impressions or to support one view over another;
References, or earlier work, are acknowledged where possible, and plagiarism is avoided. practices.
For individuals, research integrity is an aspect of moral character and experience. It involves above all a commitment to intellectual honesty and personal responsibility for one's actions and to a range of practices that characterize responsible research conduct.
Redundant, Duplicate and Repetitive publications are the most important concerns in the scientific research/literature writing. The occurrence of redundancy affects the concepts of science/literature and carries with it sanctions of consequences. To define this issue is much challenging because of the many varieties in which one can slice, reformat, or reproduce material from an already published study. This issue also goes beyond the duplication of a single study because it might possible that the same or similar data can be published in the early, middle, and later stages of an on-going study. This may have a damaging impact on the scientific study/literature base. Similar to slicing a cake, there are so many ways of representing a study or a set of data/information. We can slice a cake into different shapes like squares, triangles, rounds, or layers. Which of these might be the best way to slice a cake? Unfortunately, this may be the wrong question. The point is that the cake that is being referred to, the data/ information set or the study/findings, should not be sliced at all. Instead, the study should be presented as a whole to the readership to ensure the integrity of science/technology because of the impact that may have on patients who will be affected by the information contained in the literature/findings. Redundant, duplicate, or repetitive publications occur when there is representation of two or more studies, data sets, or publications in either electronic or print media. The publications can overlap partially or completely, such that a similar portion, major component(s), or complete representation of a previously/simultaneous ly or future published study is duplicated.
SALAMI SLICING: The slicing of research publication that would form one meaningful paper into several different papers is known as salami publication or salami slicing. Unlike duplicate publication, which involves reporting the exact same data in two or more publications, salami slicing involves breaking up or segmenting a large study into two or more publications. These segments are called slices of a study. As a general rule, as long as the slices of a broken-up study share the same hypotheses, population, and methods, this is not acceptable in general practice. The same slice should never be published more than once at all. According to the United States Office of Research Integrity (USORI), salami slicing can result in a distortion of the literature/findings by leading unsuspecting readers to believe that data presented in each salami slice (journal article) is derived from a different subject sample/source. Somehow this practice not only skews the scientific database but it creates repetition to waste reader's time as well as the time of editors and peer reviewers, who must also handle each paper separately.
In academia, the pressure to publish is high and the competition intense. This can lead authors to follow unethical publication practices, such as salami slicing, duplicate publication, and simultaneous submission. This slide deck explains these malpractices and shares tips on how authors can avoid them.
Ethical research and publication practices are essential for honest scholarly and scientific research. Most journals today are keenly aware of this: they publish policies on these issues and expect authors to “be aware of, and comply with, best practice in publication ethics”.This article discusses two widespread and related publishing practices that are considered unethical—duplicate publication and simultaneous submission. It draws on definitive international publication ethics guidelines.
Ethics in medical sciences research may not always translate into ethical publications.
Ethical violations in conducting medical research always promote unethical scientific publications.
Published research influences other researchers and establishes credibility for individual or journal.
When publishing research, one needs to be aware of all such actions that are unethical and hence, must be avoided. This presentation gives an overview of the topic.
I explain plainly what is salami silcing, a practice of fragmenting single research into as many publications as possible. Salami publishing and hazards
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSaptarshi Ghosh
Research integrity means conducting research according to the highest professional and ethical standards, so that the results are trustworthy.
It concerns the behavior of researchers at all stages of the research life-cycle, including declaring competing interests; data collection and data management; using appropriate methodology; drawing conclusions from results; and writing up research findings.
In academia, the pressure to publish is high and the competition intense. This can lead authors to follow unethical publication practices, such as salami slicing, duplicate publication, and simultaneous submission. This slide deck explains these malpractices and shares tips on how authors can avoid them.
Ethical research and publication practices are essential for honest scholarly and scientific research. Most journals today are keenly aware of this: they publish policies on these issues and expect authors to “be aware of, and comply with, best practice in publication ethics”.This article discusses two widespread and related publishing practices that are considered unethical—duplicate publication and simultaneous submission. It draws on definitive international publication ethics guidelines.
Ethics in medical sciences research may not always translate into ethical publications.
Ethical violations in conducting medical research always promote unethical scientific publications.
Published research influences other researchers and establishes credibility for individual or journal.
When publishing research, one needs to be aware of all such actions that are unethical and hence, must be avoided. This presentation gives an overview of the topic.
I explain plainly what is salami silcing, a practice of fragmenting single research into as many publications as possible. Salami publishing and hazards
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSaptarshi Ghosh
Research integrity means conducting research according to the highest professional and ethical standards, so that the results are trustworthy.
It concerns the behavior of researchers at all stages of the research life-cycle, including declaring competing interests; data collection and data management; using appropriate methodology; drawing conclusions from results; and writing up research findings.
The Ethical Responsibilities of Academic Research Instutions and Funder to Safeguard the Integrity of Research Presentation to MedicReS 5th World Congress on October 19,25,2015 in New York by Zubin Master, PhD
Are you familiar with the concepts of academic integrity or research misconduct? Learn what a student’s ethical responsibilities are as an academic researcher in handling and managing data, working with human subjects, and contributing to a larger body of knowledge. This is a presentation developed through the Graduate Resource Center at the University of New Mexico.
Presentation given at the 2012 UNM Jump Start Institute on April 28, 2012.
Research and Academic Integrity
a. Facilitators:
i. William L. Gannon, Ph.D., Director, UNM Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research, Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR)
ii. Gary Harrison, Ph.D., Dean, Office of Graduate Studies (OGS).
Ethical Publishing for Academic and Research Integrity.pdfsangeetadhamdhere
The talk is given at the National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan on 24th January 2019 by Dr. Sangeeta Dhamdhere, Librarian, PES Modern College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Ganeshkhind, Pune, India
Sankhya Darshan by Dr. Vijay Kumar, Teacher EducatorDr. Vijay Kumar
Sankhya Darshan is one of the Oldest ideologies of India. An attempt by Dr. Vijay Kumar, PhD in Educational Studies from Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi
An attempt to give a brief about the great ideology of Sikhism founded by Guru Nanak ji 500 years ago.
Ppt by Dr. Vijay Kumar, PhD Educational Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
1. SCIENTIFIC
MISCONDUCT
D R . V I J AY K U M A R , T E A C H E R E D U C AT O R
S C H O O L O F E D U C AT I O N , A P E E J AY S T YA U N I V E R S I T Y
2. SCIENTIFIC CONDUCT
• What is Science?
Body of knowledge which is based on logic and establishes cause and effect relationship
– Body of knowledge: discipline, subject
– Logic: Rationale
– Establish cause and effect relationship
Two broad views od science (Kerlinger, 1970)
– Static View and Dynamic View
• Static View
– Science is an activity which contributes systematized information to the world
– Work of scientist is to uncover new facts and add them to the existing corpus of knowledge
• Dynamic View
– Activity that scientist do
– Emphasis is more on heuristic nature of science –proceeding to a solution by trial and error
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
2
3. CONT…
• What is scientific?
– Anything related to science
– Based on or characterized by the methods and principles of science.
– Systematic
– Any discipline can be studies scientifically, even if that discipline may not be scientific
• Education can be studies scientifically
• What is scientific conduct?
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
3
4. SCIENTIFIC CONDUCT
• Objectivity: in observation, data collection and reporting of results, there is only one
reasonable meaning or interpretation
• Control of bias / impartiality: personal prejudices, beliefs and attitudes must not influence
research process
• Willingness to alter beliefs: when justified by the evidence, beliefs are changed
• Verification: the findings are verified by others through replication
• Induction: general conclusions are drawn from specific observations
• Precision: definitions of terms and instruments (e.g. tests) contain sufficient detail to
convey exact meaning
• Truth: Conclusions are always tentative
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
4
5. SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT
• Defined differently by different experts/institutions
• Scientific misconduct has occurred throughout the history of science.
• Some research behaviors are so at odds with the core principles of science
• Treated very harshly by the scientific community and by institutions that oversee
research.
• Anyone who engages in these behaviors is putting his or her scientific career at risk
and is threatening the overall reputation of science and the health and welfare of
the intended beneficiaries of research.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
5
6. CONT…
• Collectively these actions have come to be known as scientific misconduct.
• The US government began to take systematic interest in such misconduct in the
1980s.
• Since then, a number of studies have examined
– how frequently individual scientists have observed scientific misconduct or were involved
in it.
• In most studies at least 10% of the scientists sampled reported having observed
scientific misconduct.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
6
7. CONT…
• Defined as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism.
• Violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the
publication of professional scientific research
• fabrication, falsification, plagiarism and violation of authorship rules in proposing,
performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. -[US Department of
Health and Human Services]
• This may occur at any stage of the research process
– Data generation
– recording
– review and
– publication/ dissemination of scientific knowledge
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
7
8. COMMON TYPES OF SCIENTIFIC
MISCONDUCT
• Misappropriation of Ideas – taking the intellectual property of others, perhaps as a result
of reviewing someone else’s article or manuscript, or grant application and proceeding
with the idea as your own.
• Plagiarism – utilizing someone else’s words, published work, research processes, or
results without giving appropriate credit via full citation.
• Self-plagiarism – recycling or re-using your own work without appropriate disclosure
and/or citation.
.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
8
9. CONT…
• Impropriety of Authorship – claiming undeserved authorship on your own behalf,
excluding material contributors from co-authorship, including non-contributors as
authors, or submitting multi-author papers to journals without the consensus of all
named authors.
• Failure to Comply with Legislative and Regulatory Requirements – willful violations of rules
concerning the safe use of chemicals, care of human and animal test subjects,
inappropriate use of investigative drugs or equipment, and inappropriate use of research
funds
• Violation of Generally Accepted Research Practices – this can include the proposal of the
research study, manipulation of experiments to generate preferred results, deceptive
statistical or analytical practices to generate preferred results, or improper reporting of
results to present a misleading outcome.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
9
10. CONT…
• Falsification of Data – rather than manipulate the experiments or the data to generate
preferred results, this transgression simply fabricates the data entirely.
• Failure to Support Validation of Your Research – by refusing to supply complete
datasets or research material needed to facilitate validation of your results through a
replication study.
• Failure to Respond to Known Cases of Unsuccessful Validation Attempts – published
research that is found to be flawed should be retracted from the journal that
published it.
• Inappropriate Behavior in Relation to Suspected Misconduct – failure to cooperate
with any claims of misconduct made against you, failure to report known or
suspected misconduct, destruction of any evidence related to any claim of
misconduct, retaliation against any persons involved in a claim of misconduct,
knowingly making false claims of misconduct.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
10
11. DEFINITIONS OF SCIENTIFIC
MISCONDUCT
• “fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research,
or in reporting research results.”
By U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy (Office of Research Integrity)
According to the definition, the three elements of misconduct are defined as follows:
• Fabrication is “making up data or results.”
• Falsification is “manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or
omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the
research record.”
• Plagiarism is “the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words
without giving appropriate credit.”
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
11
12. CONT…
To be considered research misconduct, actions must represent a
• “significant departure from accepted practices,”
• must have been “committed intentionally, or knowingly, or recklessly,” and
• must be “proven by a preponderance of evidence.”
• According to the statement,
“research misconduct does not include differences of opinion.”
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
12
13. SOME RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS AND RESEARCH-FUNDING AGENCIES
DEFINE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH MISCONDUCT MORE BROADLY.
These institutional definitions may add, for example,
• abuse of confidentiality in peer review
• failure to allocate credit appropriately in scientific publications
• not observing regulations governing research
• failure to report misconduct, or
• retaliation against individuals who report misconduct to the list of behaviors that are
considered misconduct.
In addition, the National Science Foundation, US has retained a clause in its misconduct
policies that includes
behaviors that seriously deviate from commonly accepted research practices as possible
misconduct.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
13
14. • Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
• World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
14
15. SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT AS PER
WORLD ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL EDITORS (WAME)
• Gives a useful overview of misconduct
• Use a slightly amended version of the US Office of Research Integrity definition of
scientific misconduct
Includes behaviours as given as follows:
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
15
16. FALSIFICATION OF DATA
• Ranging from fabrication to deceptive selective reporting of findings and omission of
conflicting data, or
• willful suppression and/or distortion of data
• Falsification is the alteration of the observed result of a scientific experiment.
• This is the practice of manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing
or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research
record.
• Falsification is the most common form of scientific misconduct, in a study of China 2006 40%
of the investigated misconduct cases were falsifications.
• Falsification involves making changes for example in the set up or results of an experiment in a
way that cannot be scientifically justified.
• Most commonly with the intention of improving the results or removing results that do not fit
the hypothesis.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
16
17. PLAGIARISM
The appropriation of the language, ideas, or thoughts of another without crediting their
true source, and
representation of them as one's own original work.
Copying someone else’s intellectual property (information or ideas) as own achievement
without giving the actual source.
Most frequent type of misconduct and major breach of ethics.
qualitatively different from the falsification and fabrication because it does not distort
scientific knowledge, although it has important consequences for the careers of people
involved, and for the whole scientific enterprise
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
17
18. IMPROPRIETIES OF AUTHORSHIP
• Improper assignment of credit, such as
• excluding others,
• misrepresentation of the same material as original in more than one publication,
• inclusion of individuals as authors who have not made a definite contribution to the
work published; or
• submission of multi-authored publications without the concurrence of all authors.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
18
19. MISAPPROPRIATION OF THE IDEAS OF OTHERS
• An important aspect of scholarly activity is the exchange of ideas among colleagues.
• Scholars can acquire novel ideas from others during the process of reviewing grant
applications and manuscripts.
• However, improper use of such information can constitute fraud.
• Wholesale appropriation of such material constitutes misconduct.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
19
20. VIOLATION OF GENERALLY ACCEPTED RESEARCH
PRACTICES
• Serious deviation from accepted practices in proposing or carrying out research,
• improper manipulation of experiments to obtain biased results,
• deceptive statistical or analytical manipulations, or
• improper reporting of results
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
20
21. MATERIAL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LEGISLATIVE
AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING
RESEARCH:
Including but not limited to
• serious or substantial, repeated, willful violations of applicable local regulations and
law
• involving the use of funds, care of animals, human subjects, investigational drugs,
recombinant products, new devices, or radioactive, biologic, or chemical materials.
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
21
22. INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR IN RELATION TO
MISCONDUCT
This includes
• unfounded or knowingly false accusations of misconduct,
• failure to report known or suspected misconduct,
• withholding or destruction of information relevant to a claim of misconduct and
• retaliation against persons involved in the allegation or investigation
26-04-2021
Basics of Scientific Misconduct by Dr. Vijay Kumar,
Teacher Educator, Apeejay Stya University
22