MYCOBACTERIUM LEPRAE
It is a chronic infectious
disease caused by M.leprae,
an acid fast, rod shaped
bacillus.
It mainly affects the skin,
peripheral nerves, and mucosa
of the respiratory tract etc…
HISTORY
One of the oldest and most
dreaded disease known to
mankind.
Discovered by Dr.Gerhard
Armauer Hansen in 1873 in
Norway.
Hansen’s disease
The term leprosy was taken
from a Latin word, ‘lepra’
means scaly.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Age
All ages,from early infancy to very old age
Youngest age reported is 1 and half months
Sex
Both
Males more than females,2:1
Source of infection
Patient
MYCOBACTERIUM
LEPRAE
MORPHOLOGY
• Slender,straight or slightly curved rods
• Size – 1-8µmx0.2-0.5 µm.
• Occurs characteristically in clumps or
bundles(globi)
• Acid fast bacilli
• Live bacilli, solid uniform structure.
• Dead appear as fragmented
with granules.
CULTIVATION
Not possible to cultivate – media, tissue culture
Generation time – 12–13 days[20 days]
Cultivation
Foot pad of mice
Nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus)
Chimpanzees
Monkeys
Slender loris
Indian pangolin
Chipmunks
Golden hamsters
European hedgehog
Adaptation in artificial media – ICRC bacillus [Indian Cancer Research Center]
CULTIVATION
1.FOOT PAD OF MICE
2.NINE BANDED ARMADILLO
ANTIGENIC STRUCTURE
Cell wall – 1.Peptidoglycan layer
2.Lipoarabinomannan
layer(LAM-B)
3.Mycosides(PGL-1)
LAM-B highly immunogenic.
PGL-1 Protects pathogens against host
cell enzymes and suppress CMI.
TRANSMISSION
-Nasal droplets
-Contact transmission
RISK FACTORS
Close contact
Immunosuppression
Malnutrition
Genetics
PATHOGENESIS
Chronic granulomatous disease
Patient is the only source of
infection-nasal discharge&skin
lesion
Mostly affects the cooler parts of
the body skin, eyes and nasal
mucosa.
Incubation period- long&variable
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
Skin
Discolored patches on skin
Dry skin
Painless ulcers on the soles of feet
Painless swelling or lumps on the face and ear lobes
TYPES OF LEPROSY
LEPROMATOUS TYPE
Generalized form
Found in individuals with low resistance
Severe and prognosis is poor.
More infectious
Lepromin test – negative (CMI )
Nodular lesions on face,ear lobes,hands, feet and less
commonly on trunk.
Bacilli are shed in sweat , nasal and oral secretions
Continous bacteremia is commonly seen
TUBERCULOID TYPE
Localised form.
Seen in patients with high degree of resistance
Skin lesions are few- face, limb and trunk.
Consists of non elevated hypo or
hyperpigmented macular patches
Bacilli are very few & absent in tissues
Lepromin test- positive.
Diagnosis – clinical& histological findings.
DIMORPHOUS TYPE
Clinically resemble tuberculoid leprosy
INDETERMINATE TYPE
Neither characteristic of tuberculoid not
lepromatous type.
Lesions heals spontaneously
RIDLEY & JOPLING’S
CLASSIFICATION
On the basis of clinical , histopathological
and immunological findings
1. Tuberculoid(TT)
2. Borderline tuberculoid(BT)
3. Borderline(BB)
4. Borderline lepromatous(BL)
5. Lepromatous(LL)
WHO CLASSIFICATION
Classification depends upon number of skin
lesions and involvement of nerves
Paucibacillary
When there are ≤5 skin lesions and
no/one nerve trunk involvement.
Multibacillary
6 or more skin lesions and more than
one nerve trunk involvement.
Complications
Complications in leprosy patients may be of two types- deformities and
allergic response ( called lepra reactions types, I and II)
Deformities
Abou t 25% of untreated cases develop deformities in due course of time
which may arise due to-(1) nerve injury leading to muscle weakness or
paralysis, or (2) disease process (facial deformities or loss of eyebrow), or
(3) infection or injury (ulcers).
Common deformities include
Face: Leonine facies, sagging face, loss of eyebrow/ eye lashes, saddle nose
and corneal opacity and ulcers
Hands: Claw hand and wrist drop
Feet: Foot drop, clawing of toes, inversion of foot, and plantar ulcers.
LAB DIAGNOSIS
SPECIMENS
Nasal mucosa
Skin lesions
Ear lobes
Total 6 specimens are collected .
Including 4 from skin [buttocks , chin , cheek , forehead] one from nasal
mucosa and ear lobule
Slit and scrape method[ skin cleansed with spirit in order to remove any
saprophytic acid fast bacilli
Skin is punched tightly to minimise bleeding
Cut of 5mm long is made with scalpel , wipe of blood or lymph
Bottom and sides of slit are scrapped with point of blade
ACID FAST STAINING
5% H2SO4
1-10 bacilli in 100 fields =1+
1-10 bacilli in 10 fields = 2+
1-10 bacilli per field =3+
10-100 bacilli per field =4+
100-1000 bacilli per field = 5+
More than 1000 bacilli, clumps& globi in every
field=6+
BACTERIOLOGICAL INDEX(BI)
 No of total bacilli in a tissue.
BI= NO. of pluses(+) scored in all smears
Number of smears
MORPHOLOGICAL INDEX(MI)
 % of uniformly stained bacilli out of the total
number of bacilli counted
LEPROMIN TEST
Described by
Mitsuda in 1919.
Intradermal inj of
0.1ml of lepromin
Biphasic response
EARLY REACTION OF
FERNANDEZ
Consists of erythema and induration
developing hours and usually remains for 3-
5 days
Is a delayed type hypersensitivity reactions
Greater than 10mm diameter after 48 hrs
considered as positive
Do not indicate active infection
LATE REACTION OF MITSUDA
Appears in 1-2 weeks after
injection
Reaction appears in the form of
nodule that may ulcerate
Takes few weeks to heal
Reading taking after 21 days
Nodule of more than 5 mm :
positive
Positive Mitsuda indicates
resistance to leprosy
ANIMAL INOCULATION
Foot pad of mice
Nine banded armadillo
Tissue from LL containing leprae bacilli
inoculated intradermally into footpad of
mouse kept at 20 degree . A granuloma
develops at site in 1-6 months
Inoculation with lepra bacilli animal
develops a generalized infection with
extensive multiplication of bacilli and
lesions resembles LL
SEROLOGICAL TESTS
Detection of anti-phenolic glycolipid-1(antiPGL-1)
antibodies.
Latex agglutination
MLPA
ELISA
AURAMINE STAINING FOR
VIABILITY
To assess the metabolic activity of m.leprae
in clinical samples
MOLECULAR METHODS
Real time PCR
For detection of M.leprae DNA from clinical
samples
For treatment monitoring
TREATMENT
PREVENTION
Early diagnosis & treatment with MDT.
Surveillance of contacts
Health education
Vaccination - BCG
NATIONAL LEPROSY
ERADICATION PROGRAMME
Launched in 1983.
Vision -Leprosy free india by 2030.
India has achieved leprosy elimination at
National level in Dec 2005(PR<1/10000
population)
THANK YOU

mycobacterium leprae.pptx for educational

  • 1.
  • 2.
    It is achronic infectious disease caused by M.leprae, an acid fast, rod shaped bacillus. It mainly affects the skin, peripheral nerves, and mucosa of the respiratory tract etc…
  • 3.
    HISTORY One of theoldest and most dreaded disease known to mankind. Discovered by Dr.Gerhard Armauer Hansen in 1873 in Norway. Hansen’s disease The term leprosy was taken from a Latin word, ‘lepra’ means scaly.
  • 5.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY Age All ages,from earlyinfancy to very old age Youngest age reported is 1 and half months Sex Both Males more than females,2:1 Source of infection Patient
  • 6.
  • 7.
    MORPHOLOGY • Slender,straight orslightly curved rods • Size – 1-8µmx0.2-0.5 µm. • Occurs characteristically in clumps or bundles(globi) • Acid fast bacilli • Live bacilli, solid uniform structure. • Dead appear as fragmented with granules.
  • 8.
    CULTIVATION Not possible tocultivate – media, tissue culture Generation time – 12–13 days[20 days] Cultivation Foot pad of mice Nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) Chimpanzees Monkeys Slender loris Indian pangolin Chipmunks Golden hamsters European hedgehog Adaptation in artificial media – ICRC bacillus [Indian Cancer Research Center]
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    ANTIGENIC STRUCTURE Cell wall– 1.Peptidoglycan layer 2.Lipoarabinomannan layer(LAM-B) 3.Mycosides(PGL-1) LAM-B highly immunogenic. PGL-1 Protects pathogens against host cell enzymes and suppress CMI.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    PATHOGENESIS Chronic granulomatous disease Patientis the only source of infection-nasal discharge&skin lesion Mostly affects the cooler parts of the body skin, eyes and nasal mucosa. Incubation period- long&variable
  • 16.
    SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS Skin Discoloredpatches on skin Dry skin Painless ulcers on the soles of feet Painless swelling or lumps on the face and ear lobes
  • 17.
  • 18.
    LEPROMATOUS TYPE Generalized form Foundin individuals with low resistance Severe and prognosis is poor. More infectious Lepromin test – negative (CMI ) Nodular lesions on face,ear lobes,hands, feet and less commonly on trunk. Bacilli are shed in sweat , nasal and oral secretions Continous bacteremia is commonly seen
  • 19.
    TUBERCULOID TYPE Localised form. Seenin patients with high degree of resistance Skin lesions are few- face, limb and trunk. Consists of non elevated hypo or hyperpigmented macular patches Bacilli are very few & absent in tissues Lepromin test- positive. Diagnosis – clinical& histological findings.
  • 20.
    DIMORPHOUS TYPE Clinically resembletuberculoid leprosy INDETERMINATE TYPE Neither characteristic of tuberculoid not lepromatous type. Lesions heals spontaneously
  • 21.
    RIDLEY & JOPLING’S CLASSIFICATION Onthe basis of clinical , histopathological and immunological findings 1. Tuberculoid(TT) 2. Borderline tuberculoid(BT) 3. Borderline(BB) 4. Borderline lepromatous(BL) 5. Lepromatous(LL)
  • 22.
    WHO CLASSIFICATION Classification dependsupon number of skin lesions and involvement of nerves Paucibacillary When there are ≤5 skin lesions and no/one nerve trunk involvement. Multibacillary 6 or more skin lesions and more than one nerve trunk involvement.
  • 24.
    Complications Complications in leprosypatients may be of two types- deformities and allergic response ( called lepra reactions types, I and II) Deformities Abou t 25% of untreated cases develop deformities in due course of time which may arise due to-(1) nerve injury leading to muscle weakness or paralysis, or (2) disease process (facial deformities or loss of eyebrow), or (3) infection or injury (ulcers). Common deformities include Face: Leonine facies, sagging face, loss of eyebrow/ eye lashes, saddle nose and corneal opacity and ulcers Hands: Claw hand and wrist drop Feet: Foot drop, clawing of toes, inversion of foot, and plantar ulcers.
  • 25.
    LAB DIAGNOSIS SPECIMENS Nasal mucosa Skinlesions Ear lobes Total 6 specimens are collected . Including 4 from skin [buttocks , chin , cheek , forehead] one from nasal mucosa and ear lobule Slit and scrape method[ skin cleansed with spirit in order to remove any saprophytic acid fast bacilli Skin is punched tightly to minimise bleeding Cut of 5mm long is made with scalpel , wipe of blood or lymph Bottom and sides of slit are scrapped with point of blade
  • 26.
    ACID FAST STAINING 5%H2SO4 1-10 bacilli in 100 fields =1+ 1-10 bacilli in 10 fields = 2+ 1-10 bacilli per field =3+ 10-100 bacilli per field =4+ 100-1000 bacilli per field = 5+ More than 1000 bacilli, clumps& globi in every field=6+
  • 27.
    BACTERIOLOGICAL INDEX(BI)  Noof total bacilli in a tissue. BI= NO. of pluses(+) scored in all smears Number of smears MORPHOLOGICAL INDEX(MI)  % of uniformly stained bacilli out of the total number of bacilli counted
  • 28.
    LEPROMIN TEST Described by Mitsudain 1919. Intradermal inj of 0.1ml of lepromin Biphasic response
  • 30.
    EARLY REACTION OF FERNANDEZ Consistsof erythema and induration developing hours and usually remains for 3- 5 days Is a delayed type hypersensitivity reactions Greater than 10mm diameter after 48 hrs considered as positive Do not indicate active infection
  • 31.
    LATE REACTION OFMITSUDA Appears in 1-2 weeks after injection Reaction appears in the form of nodule that may ulcerate Takes few weeks to heal Reading taking after 21 days Nodule of more than 5 mm : positive Positive Mitsuda indicates resistance to leprosy
  • 32.
    ANIMAL INOCULATION Foot padof mice Nine banded armadillo Tissue from LL containing leprae bacilli inoculated intradermally into footpad of mouse kept at 20 degree . A granuloma develops at site in 1-6 months Inoculation with lepra bacilli animal develops a generalized infection with extensive multiplication of bacilli and lesions resembles LL
  • 33.
    SEROLOGICAL TESTS Detection ofanti-phenolic glycolipid-1(antiPGL-1) antibodies. Latex agglutination MLPA ELISA
  • 34.
    AURAMINE STAINING FOR VIABILITY Toassess the metabolic activity of m.leprae in clinical samples MOLECULAR METHODS Real time PCR For detection of M.leprae DNA from clinical samples For treatment monitoring
  • 35.
  • 36.
    PREVENTION Early diagnosis &treatment with MDT. Surveillance of contacts Health education Vaccination - BCG
  • 37.
    NATIONAL LEPROSY ERADICATION PROGRAMME Launchedin 1983. Vision -Leprosy free india by 2030. India has achieved leprosy elimination at National level in Dec 2005(PR<1/10000 population)
  • 38.

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Left untreated the d/s may cayse progressive & permanent disabilities. Leprosy is curable and treatment in the early stages can prevent disabilities.
  • #4 Described in literature of ancient civilizations.