SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Level 5
David Mullich
Game Mechanics
The Los Angeles Film School
Resources
 Resources
 Production
 Consumption
 Investments
 Diminishing Returns
 Resource Management
Construction
 Construction
 Extended Actions
 Interruptible Actions
 Ownership
 Transfer of Control
 Constructive Play
Octalysis
Games Are Social In Nature
Even single-player ones.
Conflict
One or more parties, often players or players
against the game system, have goals that cannot
be satisfied together.
Sources of Conflict
 Combat
 Overcome
 Combat
 Seize Control/Ownership
 Combat
 Capture/Evade
 Combat
 Construct/Destroy
 Combat
 Player Elimination
 And don’t forget… Combat
Non-Combat Gaming
Extra Credits: How to make social mechanics fun
What Was The Main Message Of This
Video?
Simulating Social Mechanics
 Time Pressure on Dialog Choices
 Moves and Counter-Moves
 Skill Check Against Stats
 Persuasion Bar
 Persuading Voters
Let’s Leave That To Narrative Mechanic
Lecture
Social Interaction
When two or more players have two-way
communication between each other.
Why Designers Use Social Interaction
 Emotional Immersion
 Freedom of Choice
 Illusion of Influence
Social Interaction Design
Considerations
 Reasons for Communicating
 Get Something
 Performing Collaborative Actions
 Cooperation
 Communication Channels
 Natural
 Stimulated
 Pacing
 Turn-Based
 Real-Time
Competition
The struggle between players or against the game
system to achieve a goal where the performance of
the players can be measured at least relatively.
Forms Of Competition
 Enemies
 Incompatible Goals
 Preventing Goals
 Rewards
Direct vs. Indirect Competition
Direct
 Overcome
 King of the Hill
Indirect
 Races without Interference
 Last Man Standing
Why Designers Use Competition
Encourages:
 Conflict
 Tension
 Social Status
Discourages:
 Cooperation
 Alliances
 Experimenting
Competition Design Considerations
 Direct or Indirect?
 Symmetric, Asymmetric, or Unknown ?
 Outcome?
Player Killing
When players can intentionally or unintentionally
remove players from the game for at least a
period of time.
Why Designers Use Player Killing
Main Uses:
 Player Elimination (but with Respawning)
 Team Elimination
 Score Keeping
Encourages:
 Risk/Reward Decisions
 Social Status
Affects:
 Ownership
 Team Balance
 Team Play
Player Killing Design Considerations
 Penalties (for being killed)
 Respawning
 Friendly Fire
 Rewards (for killing)
Betrayal
One or several players that have an agreement with
other players intentionally fail to do as agreed or
otherwise hinder the fulfillment of the agreement.
Betrayal Elements
 Cooperation Between Players
 Commitment To A Goal
 Incentive For Breaking Commitment
Where Betrayal Can Occur
 Mutual Goals
 Collaborative Actions
 Player-Decided Rewards
Why Designers Use Betrayal
Promotes:
 Emotional Immersion
 Role-Reversal
 Leap Of Faith
Balances:
 Negotiation
 Trading
 Alliances
Betrayal Design Considerations
 What collaborative actions have a delayed
effect?
 What are players’ perceived chance of
individual rewards for betraying another
player?
 Do players have asymmetric information
about other player’s actions?
 Can bluffing be used to conceal betrayal?
Cooperation
Player cooperate; i.e., coordinate their actions
and share resources, in order to reach goals or
subgoals of the game.
Ways To Achieve Cooperation
 Team Play
 Mutual Goals With Shared Results
 Shared Rewards
 Collaborative Actions
Why Designers Use Collaboration
Encourages:
 Social Interaction
 Alliances
 Betrayal
 Constructive Play
Reduces:
 Competition
 Tension
Collaboration Design Considerations
 Shared Resources
 Mutual Goals
 Shared Rewards
Player-Decided Results
Players are responsible for deciding at least some of
the results of player actions, and their decisions are
not necessarily based on the rules of the game.
Alliances
A group of players who have agreed to obey
particular and specific rules of conduct toward each
other and who, usually, have a shared agenda.
Why Designers Use Alliances
Encourages:
 Team Play
 Social Organizations
Discourages:
 Competition
Alliances Design Considerations
 What are players’ mutual goals or common
enemies?
 What are the rules of conduct that players
can agree to?
Team Play
Players in a group or team coordinate their
actions, abilities and roles in order to reach a
common goal.
Ways To Use Team Play
 Avatars In Multiplayer Games
 Units in Single Player Games
Why Designers Use Team Play
Encourages:
 Social Interaction
 Cooperation
 Collaborative Actions
 Constructive Play
Discourages:
 Betrayal
Team Play Design Considerations
 What is the mutual goal and
its rewards?
 What are the shared
resources?
 Do teams form at the
beginning of the play
session, or dynamically
during gameplay?
 Does team play occur
between players or is it
simulated through units?
 How does each team
member feel important and
significant?
Trading
Players exchange a resource, whether it is
information, actions, or game elements, between
each other or the game system.
Why Designers Use Trading
Encourages:
 Social Interaction
 Cooperation
 Alternate Strategies For Progression
 Avoiding Strategies For Blocking Player
Progression
Balances:
 Resources
Trading Design Considerations
 Resources to be Traded
 Incentive
 Initiation (Offer)
 Bargaining (Optional)
 Resolution (Exchange)
Special Cases:
 Ransom
 Gifts
Bidding
Players invest resources, usually some kind of
currency, for an uncertain outcome in order to get
a reward of some kind.
Why Designers Use Bidding
Encourages:
 Competition For Resources
 Player-Defined Goals
 Transfer Of Control Of Resources
 Conversion Of Resources
 Trade-Offs
 Alternate Strategy To Combat
Bidding Design Considerations
 Are player bids known to other players?
 What order do players bid in?
 Can players negotiate during bidding?
 Can players be eliminated during bidding?
 How does bidding end?
 How is outcome determined?
Special Cases:
 Auctions
 Voting
Bluffing
Players have a possibility to convey false
information to other players in order to benefit
from their situation.
Why Designers Use Bluffing
Encourages:
 Betrayal
 Makes Trading, Betting, Bidding More
Complex
 Social Skills To Random Situations
Bluffing Design Considerations
 What asymmetric information can be the
basis for bluffing?
 How is false information indirectly
communicated from one player to another?
 What are the rewards and penalties for
bluffing?
Eliminate
Remove a game element from its location in
the game space.
Examples Of Elimination
 Remove An Element That Hinders Player
Actions
 Remove A Threat To The Player’s Goals
 Removal Is A Goal Itself
Why Designers Use Elimination Goals
 Turn Player Into a Consumer of Game
Elements
 Prevent Opponent’s Survive or Evade Goals
 Speed Up and Simplify End Game
Encourages:
 Conflict
 Tension
 High-Level Closures
Eliminate Design Considerations
 What game element is eliminated?
 How is the elimination achieved?
 Is the elimination permanent?
Rescue
The goal of freeing someone or something
that is guarded.
Why Designers Use Rescue Goals
 Prevents Guard Goals
 Narrative Structure
Encourages:
 Conflict
Rescue Design Considerations
 What/who must be rescued?
 What obstacles must be overcome?
 Does the hostage need to be moved to a
safe area?
 Do the players have other goals besides
rescuing?
Choose one of the following games to play:
 Boomtown (3-5p, 30m)
 *Cartagena the Escape (2-5p, 30m)
 Colossal Arena (2-5p, 40-60m)
 For Sale (3-6p, 20-30m)
 Forbidden Island (2-4p, 30m)
 Money (3-5p, 20-30m)
 *Pandemic (2-4p, 45m)
 *Quo Vadis (3-5p, 45m)
 Space Alert (1-5p, 30m)
 The Downfall of Pompeii (2-4p, 45)
Group Quest
Design an analog game prototype using
mechanics supporting one of the following goals:
 Eliminate
 Rescue
Negotiation
A situation where the players confer with each
other in order to reach an agreement or
settlement.
Examples of Negotiations
 Collaborate Actions
 Players Exchanging Resources
 Deciding When To Use Asymmetric Abilities
 Deciding When To Use Shared Resources
 Player-Decided Results
 Deciding On Handicaps For Balancing
Why Designers Use Negotiations
Encourages:
 Social Interaction
 Transfer of Control
 Alliances
 Game Mastery
 Engagement During Downtime
Balances:
 Players
Negotiation Design Considerations
 How are negotiations initiated?
 How does bargaining occur?
 How are agreements reached?
 Can third parties interrupt the negotiation?
 How are agreement breaches handled?
Player Negotiation Scenarios
Social Dilemma
Players tend to compete against each other even
though cooperation would be best for all
involved.
Why Designers Use Social Dilemmas
Encourages:
 Betrayal
 Tension
 Risk/Reward Decisions
Balances:
 Alliances
Social Dilemma Design
Considerations
 What are the shared penalties for
cooperating?
 What are the individual rewards for
betrayal?
Research and use the LMS to report on
games using group activities discussed in
class.
LAFS Game Mechanics - Social Mechanics

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Brief Introduction to Game Design
Brief Introduction to Game DesignBrief Introduction to Game Design
Brief Introduction to Game Design
 
Phases of game development
Phases of game developmentPhases of game development
Phases of game development
 
Game design document
Game design document Game design document
Game design document
 
2-Game Design (Game Design and Development)
2-Game Design (Game Design and Development)2-Game Design (Game Design and Development)
2-Game Design (Game Design and Development)
 
20 Game Ideas You Should Steal
20 Game Ideas You Should Steal20 Game Ideas You Should Steal
20 Game Ideas You Should Steal
 
Video game proposal
Video game proposalVideo game proposal
Video game proposal
 
Game development
Game developmentGame development
Game development
 
Game Design Document - Step by Step Guide
Game Design Document - Step by Step GuideGame Design Document - Step by Step Guide
Game Design Document - Step by Step Guide
 
Anatomy of a Modern Game design Document - Ralf Adam, Vera Frisch - 4C:Kyiv
Anatomy of a Modern Game design Document - Ralf Adam, Vera Frisch - 4C:KyivAnatomy of a Modern Game design Document - Ralf Adam, Vera Frisch - 4C:Kyiv
Anatomy of a Modern Game design Document - Ralf Adam, Vera Frisch - 4C:Kyiv
 
LAFS Game Mechanics - Randomness and Risk
LAFS Game Mechanics - Randomness and RiskLAFS Game Mechanics - Randomness and Risk
LAFS Game Mechanics - Randomness and Risk
 
1-Introduction (Game Design and Development)
1-Introduction (Game Design and Development)1-Introduction (Game Design and Development)
1-Introduction (Game Design and Development)
 
Game development Pre-Production
Game development Pre-ProductionGame development Pre-Production
Game development Pre-Production
 
LAFS Game Mechanics - Progression Mechanics
LAFS Game Mechanics - Progression MechanicsLAFS Game Mechanics - Progression Mechanics
LAFS Game Mechanics - Progression Mechanics
 
Game Concept
Game ConceptGame Concept
Game Concept
 
The Principles of Game Design
The Principles of Game DesignThe Principles of Game Design
The Principles of Game Design
 
Game Design - Lecture 1
Game Design - Lecture 1Game Design - Lecture 1
Game Design - Lecture 1
 
LAFS Game Design 1 - Structural Elements
LAFS Game Design 1 - Structural ElementsLAFS Game Design 1 - Structural Elements
LAFS Game Design 1 - Structural Elements
 
Game development pipeline
Game development pipelineGame development pipeline
Game development pipeline
 
Offshore Game Development Presentation
Offshore Game Development PresentationOffshore Game Development Presentation
Offshore Game Development Presentation
 
Game Development Step by Step
Game Development Step by StepGame Development Step by Step
Game Development Step by Step
 

Similar to LAFS Game Mechanics - Social Mechanics

The Co-op Revolution: Top 5 Tips for Designing Collaboration
The Co-op Revolution: Top 5 Tips for Designing CollaborationThe Co-op Revolution: Top 5 Tips for Designing Collaboration
The Co-op Revolution: Top 5 Tips for Designing Collaboration
Amy Jo Kim
 
Coping with Verbal Abuse in Online Games
Coping with Verbal Abuse in Online GamesCoping with Verbal Abuse in Online Games
Coping with Verbal Abuse in Online Games
Denique Ferguson
 
Smart Gamification: Social Game Design for a Connected World
Smart Gamification: Social Game Design for a Connected WorldSmart Gamification: Social Game Design for a Connected World
Smart Gamification: Social Game Design for a Connected World
Amy Jo Kim
 

Similar to LAFS Game Mechanics - Social Mechanics (20)

LAFS Game Mechanics - Balancing
LAFS Game Mechanics - BalancingLAFS Game Mechanics - Balancing
LAFS Game Mechanics - Balancing
 
Amy Jo Kim - MFW15
Amy Jo Kim - MFW15Amy Jo Kim - MFW15
Amy Jo Kim - MFW15
 
Co op talk
Co op talkCo op talk
Co op talk
 
LAFS Game Mechanics - Tactical Mechanics
LAFS Game Mechanics - Tactical MechanicsLAFS Game Mechanics - Tactical Mechanics
LAFS Game Mechanics - Tactical Mechanics
 
LAFS Game Mechanics - Information and Game Mechanics
LAFS Game Mechanics - Information and Game MechanicsLAFS Game Mechanics - Information and Game Mechanics
LAFS Game Mechanics - Information and Game Mechanics
 
LAFS Game Mechanics - Balancing
LAFS Game Mechanics - BalancingLAFS Game Mechanics - Balancing
LAFS Game Mechanics - Balancing
 
The Co-op Revolution: Top 5 Tips for Designing Collaboration
The Co-op Revolution: Top 5 Tips for Designing CollaborationThe Co-op Revolution: Top 5 Tips for Designing Collaboration
The Co-op Revolution: Top 5 Tips for Designing Collaboration
 
Triple helix-ig-presentation
Triple helix-ig-presentationTriple helix-ig-presentation
Triple helix-ig-presentation
 
The Co-op Revolution: 7 Rules for Collaborative Game Design
The Co-op Revolution: 7 Rules for Collaborative Game DesignThe Co-op Revolution: 7 Rules for Collaborative Game Design
The Co-op Revolution: 7 Rules for Collaborative Game Design
 
Android Gaming Tips & Tricks - Mac Game Hack Tips
Android Gaming Tips & Tricks - Mac Game Hack TipsAndroid Gaming Tips & Tricks - Mac Game Hack Tips
Android Gaming Tips & Tricks - Mac Game Hack Tips
 
Principles of Gamification Presentation
Principles of Gamification PresentationPrinciples of Gamification Presentation
Principles of Gamification Presentation
 
LAFS Game Design 10 - Fun and Accessability
LAFS Game Design 10 - Fun and AccessabilityLAFS Game Design 10 - Fun and Accessability
LAFS Game Design 10 - Fun and Accessability
 
Coping with Verbal Abuse in Online Games
Coping with Verbal Abuse in Online GamesCoping with Verbal Abuse in Online Games
Coping with Verbal Abuse in Online Games
 
Gamification Workshop 2010
Gamification Workshop 2010Gamification Workshop 2010
Gamification Workshop 2010
 
Game design for marketers
Game design for marketersGame design for marketers
Game design for marketers
 
1,2,3,4...5 essential steps to define the concept for a freemium game
1,2,3,4...5 essential steps to define the concept for a freemium game1,2,3,4...5 essential steps to define the concept for a freemium game
1,2,3,4...5 essential steps to define the concept for a freemium game
 
Designing with Gamification: Tips for Creating Fun & Engaging User Experiences
Designing with Gamification: Tips for Creating Fun & Engaging User ExperiencesDesigning with Gamification: Tips for Creating Fun & Engaging User Experiences
Designing with Gamification: Tips for Creating Fun & Engaging User Experiences
 
LAFS Game Mechanics - Replayability
LAFS Game Mechanics - ReplayabilityLAFS Game Mechanics - Replayability
LAFS Game Mechanics - Replayability
 
Cross-media social game experiences
Cross-media social game experiencesCross-media social game experiences
Cross-media social game experiences
 
Smart Gamification: Social Game Design for a Connected World
Smart Gamification: Social Game Design for a Connected WorldSmart Gamification: Social Game Design for a Connected World
Smart Gamification: Social Game Design for a Connected World
 

More from David Mullich

More from David Mullich (17)

LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 6: Advertising and Publicity
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 6: Advertising and PublicityLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 6: Advertising and Publicity
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 6: Advertising and Publicity
 
Game Fair
Game FairGame Fair
Game Fair
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 10: Business And Marketing Plans
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 10: Business And Marketing PlansLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 10: Business And Marketing Plans
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 10: Business And Marketing Plans
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 9: Community Development And Management
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 9: Community Development And ManagementLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 9: Community Development And Management
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 9: Community Development And Management
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 8: Monetization and Metrics
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 8: Monetization and MetricsLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 8: Monetization and Metrics
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 8: Monetization and Metrics
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 7: Sales and Distribution
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 7: Sales and DistributionLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 7: Sales and Distribution
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 7: Sales and Distribution
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 5: Marketing Materials
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 5: Marketing MaterialsLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 5: Marketing Materials
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 5: Marketing Materials
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 4: Social Media
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 4: Social MediaLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 4: Social Media
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 4: Social Media
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 3: Game Funding
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 3: Game FundingLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 3: Game Funding
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 3: Game Funding
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 2: Game Publishing
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 2: Game PublishingLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 2: Game Publishing
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 2: Game Publishing
 
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 1: Marketing Fundamentals
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 1: Marketing FundamentalsLAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 1: Marketing Fundamentals
LAFS Marketing and Monetization Lecture 1: Marketing Fundamentals
 
Game Production 1 Lecture
Game Production 1 LectureGame Production 1 Lecture
Game Production 1 Lecture
 
LAFS Game Design 9 - Balancing
LAFS Game Design 9 - BalancingLAFS Game Design 9 - Balancing
LAFS Game Design 9 - Balancing
 
LAFS Game Design 8 - Playtesting
LAFS Game Design 8 - PlaytestingLAFS Game Design 8 - Playtesting
LAFS Game Design 8 - Playtesting
 
LAFS Game Design 7 - Prototyping
LAFS Game Design 7 - PrototypingLAFS Game Design 7 - Prototyping
LAFS Game Design 7 - Prototyping
 
LAFS Game Design 1 - Dynamic Elements
LAFS Game Design 1 - Dynamic ElementsLAFS Game Design 1 - Dynamic Elements
LAFS Game Design 1 - Dynamic Elements
 
LAFS Game Design 1 - Dramatic Elements
LAFS Game Design 1 - Dramatic ElementsLAFS Game Design 1 - Dramatic Elements
LAFS Game Design 1 - Dramatic Elements
 

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Limitations and Solutions with LLMs"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Limitations and Solutions with LLMs"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Limitations and Solutions with LLMs"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Limitations and Solutions with LLMs"
 
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chipsFish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
 
Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6, Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...
Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6,  Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6,  Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...
Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6, Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...
 
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.pptBasic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
[GDSC YCCE] Build with AI Online Presentation
[GDSC YCCE] Build with AI Online Presentation[GDSC YCCE] Build with AI Online Presentation
[GDSC YCCE] Build with AI Online Presentation
 
Jose-Rizal-and-Philippine-Nationalism-National-Symbol-2.pptx
Jose-Rizal-and-Philippine-Nationalism-National-Symbol-2.pptxJose-Rizal-and-Philippine-Nationalism-National-Symbol-2.pptx
Jose-Rizal-and-Philippine-Nationalism-National-Symbol-2.pptx
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
 
Basic Civil Engg Notes_Chapter-6_Environment Pollution & Engineering
Basic Civil Engg Notes_Chapter-6_Environment Pollution & EngineeringBasic Civil Engg Notes_Chapter-6_Environment Pollution & Engineering
Basic Civil Engg Notes_Chapter-6_Environment Pollution & Engineering
 
Solid waste management & Types of Basic civil Engineering notes by DJ Sir.pptx
Solid waste management & Types of Basic civil Engineering notes by DJ Sir.pptxSolid waste management & Types of Basic civil Engineering notes by DJ Sir.pptx
Solid waste management & Types of Basic civil Engineering notes by DJ Sir.pptx
 
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonThe Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
 
Forest and Wildlife Resources Class 10 Free Study Material PDF
Forest and Wildlife Resources Class 10 Free Study Material PDFForest and Wildlife Resources Class 10 Free Study Material PDF
Forest and Wildlife Resources Class 10 Free Study Material PDF
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdfINU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
 
UNIT – IV_PCI Complaints: Complaints and evaluation of complaints, Handling o...
UNIT – IV_PCI Complaints: Complaints and evaluation of complaints, Handling o...UNIT – IV_PCI Complaints: Complaints and evaluation of complaints, Handling o...
UNIT – IV_PCI Complaints: Complaints and evaluation of complaints, Handling o...
 
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdfSectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
 
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
 
Danh sách HSG Bộ môn cấp trường - Cấp THPT.pdf
Danh sách HSG Bộ môn cấp trường - Cấp THPT.pdfDanh sách HSG Bộ môn cấp trường - Cấp THPT.pdf
Danh sách HSG Bộ môn cấp trường - Cấp THPT.pdf
 
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxStudents, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
 

LAFS Game Mechanics - Social Mechanics

  • 1. Level 5 David Mullich Game Mechanics The Los Angeles Film School
  • 2.
  • 3. Resources  Resources  Production  Consumption  Investments  Diminishing Returns  Resource Management
  • 4. Construction  Construction  Extended Actions  Interruptible Actions  Ownership  Transfer of Control  Constructive Play
  • 6.
  • 7. Games Are Social In Nature Even single-player ones.
  • 8. Conflict One or more parties, often players or players against the game system, have goals that cannot be satisfied together.
  • 9. Sources of Conflict  Combat  Overcome  Combat  Seize Control/Ownership  Combat  Capture/Evade  Combat  Construct/Destroy  Combat  Player Elimination  And don’t forget… Combat
  • 10. Non-Combat Gaming Extra Credits: How to make social mechanics fun
  • 11. What Was The Main Message Of This Video?
  • 12. Simulating Social Mechanics  Time Pressure on Dialog Choices  Moves and Counter-Moves  Skill Check Against Stats  Persuasion Bar  Persuading Voters
  • 13. Let’s Leave That To Narrative Mechanic Lecture
  • 14.
  • 15. Social Interaction When two or more players have two-way communication between each other.
  • 16. Why Designers Use Social Interaction  Emotional Immersion  Freedom of Choice  Illusion of Influence
  • 17. Social Interaction Design Considerations  Reasons for Communicating  Get Something  Performing Collaborative Actions  Cooperation  Communication Channels  Natural  Stimulated  Pacing  Turn-Based  Real-Time
  • 18.
  • 19. Competition The struggle between players or against the game system to achieve a goal where the performance of the players can be measured at least relatively.
  • 20. Forms Of Competition  Enemies  Incompatible Goals  Preventing Goals  Rewards
  • 21. Direct vs. Indirect Competition Direct  Overcome  King of the Hill Indirect  Races without Interference  Last Man Standing
  • 22. Why Designers Use Competition Encourages:  Conflict  Tension  Social Status Discourages:  Cooperation  Alliances  Experimenting
  • 23. Competition Design Considerations  Direct or Indirect?  Symmetric, Asymmetric, or Unknown ?  Outcome?
  • 24. Player Killing When players can intentionally or unintentionally remove players from the game for at least a period of time.
  • 25. Why Designers Use Player Killing Main Uses:  Player Elimination (but with Respawning)  Team Elimination  Score Keeping Encourages:  Risk/Reward Decisions  Social Status Affects:  Ownership  Team Balance  Team Play
  • 26. Player Killing Design Considerations  Penalties (for being killed)  Respawning  Friendly Fire  Rewards (for killing)
  • 27. Betrayal One or several players that have an agreement with other players intentionally fail to do as agreed or otherwise hinder the fulfillment of the agreement.
  • 28. Betrayal Elements  Cooperation Between Players  Commitment To A Goal  Incentive For Breaking Commitment
  • 29. Where Betrayal Can Occur  Mutual Goals  Collaborative Actions  Player-Decided Rewards
  • 30. Why Designers Use Betrayal Promotes:  Emotional Immersion  Role-Reversal  Leap Of Faith Balances:  Negotiation  Trading  Alliances
  • 31. Betrayal Design Considerations  What collaborative actions have a delayed effect?  What are players’ perceived chance of individual rewards for betraying another player?  Do players have asymmetric information about other player’s actions?  Can bluffing be used to conceal betrayal?
  • 32.
  • 33. Cooperation Player cooperate; i.e., coordinate their actions and share resources, in order to reach goals or subgoals of the game.
  • 34. Ways To Achieve Cooperation  Team Play  Mutual Goals With Shared Results  Shared Rewards  Collaborative Actions
  • 35. Why Designers Use Collaboration Encourages:  Social Interaction  Alliances  Betrayal  Constructive Play Reduces:  Competition  Tension
  • 36. Collaboration Design Considerations  Shared Resources  Mutual Goals  Shared Rewards
  • 37. Player-Decided Results Players are responsible for deciding at least some of the results of player actions, and their decisions are not necessarily based on the rules of the game.
  • 38. Alliances A group of players who have agreed to obey particular and specific rules of conduct toward each other and who, usually, have a shared agenda.
  • 39. Why Designers Use Alliances Encourages:  Team Play  Social Organizations Discourages:  Competition
  • 40. Alliances Design Considerations  What are players’ mutual goals or common enemies?  What are the rules of conduct that players can agree to?
  • 41. Team Play Players in a group or team coordinate their actions, abilities and roles in order to reach a common goal.
  • 42. Ways To Use Team Play  Avatars In Multiplayer Games  Units in Single Player Games
  • 43. Why Designers Use Team Play Encourages:  Social Interaction  Cooperation  Collaborative Actions  Constructive Play Discourages:  Betrayal
  • 44. Team Play Design Considerations  What is the mutual goal and its rewards?  What are the shared resources?  Do teams form at the beginning of the play session, or dynamically during gameplay?  Does team play occur between players or is it simulated through units?  How does each team member feel important and significant?
  • 45.
  • 46. Trading Players exchange a resource, whether it is information, actions, or game elements, between each other or the game system.
  • 47. Why Designers Use Trading Encourages:  Social Interaction  Cooperation  Alternate Strategies For Progression  Avoiding Strategies For Blocking Player Progression Balances:  Resources
  • 48. Trading Design Considerations  Resources to be Traded  Incentive  Initiation (Offer)  Bargaining (Optional)  Resolution (Exchange) Special Cases:  Ransom  Gifts
  • 49. Bidding Players invest resources, usually some kind of currency, for an uncertain outcome in order to get a reward of some kind.
  • 50. Why Designers Use Bidding Encourages:  Competition For Resources  Player-Defined Goals  Transfer Of Control Of Resources  Conversion Of Resources  Trade-Offs  Alternate Strategy To Combat
  • 51. Bidding Design Considerations  Are player bids known to other players?  What order do players bid in?  Can players negotiate during bidding?  Can players be eliminated during bidding?  How does bidding end?  How is outcome determined? Special Cases:  Auctions  Voting
  • 52. Bluffing Players have a possibility to convey false information to other players in order to benefit from their situation.
  • 53. Why Designers Use Bluffing Encourages:  Betrayal  Makes Trading, Betting, Bidding More Complex  Social Skills To Random Situations
  • 54. Bluffing Design Considerations  What asymmetric information can be the basis for bluffing?  How is false information indirectly communicated from one player to another?  What are the rewards and penalties for bluffing?
  • 55.
  • 56. Eliminate Remove a game element from its location in the game space.
  • 57. Examples Of Elimination  Remove An Element That Hinders Player Actions  Remove A Threat To The Player’s Goals  Removal Is A Goal Itself
  • 58. Why Designers Use Elimination Goals  Turn Player Into a Consumer of Game Elements  Prevent Opponent’s Survive or Evade Goals  Speed Up and Simplify End Game Encourages:  Conflict  Tension  High-Level Closures
  • 59. Eliminate Design Considerations  What game element is eliminated?  How is the elimination achieved?  Is the elimination permanent?
  • 60. Rescue The goal of freeing someone or something that is guarded.
  • 61. Why Designers Use Rescue Goals  Prevents Guard Goals  Narrative Structure Encourages:  Conflict
  • 62. Rescue Design Considerations  What/who must be rescued?  What obstacles must be overcome?  Does the hostage need to be moved to a safe area?  Do the players have other goals besides rescuing?
  • 63. Choose one of the following games to play:  Boomtown (3-5p, 30m)  *Cartagena the Escape (2-5p, 30m)  Colossal Arena (2-5p, 40-60m)  For Sale (3-6p, 20-30m)  Forbidden Island (2-4p, 30m)  Money (3-5p, 20-30m)  *Pandemic (2-4p, 45m)  *Quo Vadis (3-5p, 45m)  Space Alert (1-5p, 30m)  The Downfall of Pompeii (2-4p, 45)
  • 64. Group Quest Design an analog game prototype using mechanics supporting one of the following goals:  Eliminate  Rescue
  • 65.
  • 66. Negotiation A situation where the players confer with each other in order to reach an agreement or settlement.
  • 67. Examples of Negotiations  Collaborate Actions  Players Exchanging Resources  Deciding When To Use Asymmetric Abilities  Deciding When To Use Shared Resources  Player-Decided Results  Deciding On Handicaps For Balancing
  • 68. Why Designers Use Negotiations Encourages:  Social Interaction  Transfer of Control  Alliances  Game Mastery  Engagement During Downtime Balances:  Players
  • 69. Negotiation Design Considerations  How are negotiations initiated?  How does bargaining occur?  How are agreements reached?  Can third parties interrupt the negotiation?  How are agreement breaches handled?
  • 71. Social Dilemma Players tend to compete against each other even though cooperation would be best for all involved.
  • 72. Why Designers Use Social Dilemmas Encourages:  Betrayal  Tension  Risk/Reward Decisions Balances:  Alliances
  • 73. Social Dilemma Design Considerations  What are the shared penalties for cooperating?  What are the individual rewards for betrayal?
  • 74. Research and use the LMS to report on games using group activities discussed in class.

Editor's Notes

  1. SEGUE from RESOURCES to SOCIAL MECHANICS
  2. Almost ALL GAMES have Conflict to MOTIVATE the GOAL STRUCTURES. EXAMPLE: FIGHTING GAME: Defeat each other’s avatar. EXAMPLE: TETRIS: Game system creates blocks to fall down; player tries to keep the screen clear. In which situations does conflict appear? How severe is the conflict? Does the conflict exist outside of the game? SITUATIONS: OVERCOME, ELIMINATE Goals. Can happen on several different levels of game. SEVERITY: Modulated by LIVES, GAIN OWNERSHIP. OTHER GOALS: RESCUE, LAST MAN STANDING, KING OF THE HILL, BETRAYALS (Role-Reversals with greater EMOTIONAL IMMERSION) OUSIDE GAME: TOURNAMENTS Encourages: Emotional Immersion Tension Attention Swapping Tournaments Discourages: Cooperation Collaborative Actions Mutual Goals
  3. REQUIRES: Player must be aware they have opponents (No UNCERTAINTY OF INFORMATION or IMPERFECT INFORMATION about player goals) SOCIAL: COMPETITION, BETRAYAL
  4. Combat is an easy way to introduce conflict.
  5. Requires some form of communication. This is not only about exchanging information, but EXCHANGING GIFTS, displaying SOCIAL STATUS, and engaging in DIRECT CONFLICT. EXAMPLE: When children set up a game of HIDE & SEEK. EXAMPLE: Players CHATTING (including EMOJI’S) and TRADING through an MMORPG. Games with GAME MASTERS, STORYTELLING and ROLE-PLAYING automatically have SOCIAL INTERACTION
  6. REQUIRED FOR: COLLABORATIVE ACTIONS and COOPERATION. Also for the construction and maintenance of PLAYER-CONSTRUCTED WORLDS. PROMOTED BY: ROLEPLAYING, STORYTELLING, PERSISTENT GAME WORLDS, TEAM PLAY, SHARED RESOURCES, COOPERATION, TRADING, TURN TAKING PROMOTES: SOCIAL ORGANIZATION CONFLICTS WITH: SINGLE PLAYER GAME.
  7. REASONS: Players who want something from other players. ASYMMETIRIC RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION solved by TRADING, or gaining SOCIAL STATUS. Performing Collaborative Actions together. Motivated by SHARED RESOURCES and REWARDS but can be required through PLAYER-DECIDED RESULTS and SECRET ALLIANCES. Determining what Cooperation takes place. Modulated by BETRAYAL, DELAYED RECIPROCITY, BLUFFING, and UNCOMMITTED ALLIANCES. CHANNEL: Natural: Arises in Synchronous Games (eg, Chess), even if the unfolding of the game does not require it. Stimulated: Games with Cooperation and Conflict, based on Asymmetric Communication (Pictionary). It’s a good idea to provide several methods of communication, both within and outside the game. PACE: TURN-TAKING can SLOW down Social Interaction but gives all players a chance to PARTICIPATE. BALANCED BY: REAL-TIME GAMES
  8. Competition can be caused by CONFLICT WITH ENEMIES, EXCLUDING GOALS, INCOMPATIBLE GOALS, or REWARDS. EXAMPLE: RACE GAMES use timing to measure performance. EXAMPLE: DEFENDER score leaderboard. Once a player is certain to win, the other players have no motivation to play. PROMOTE: CONFLICT, TENSION, SOCIAL STATUS, TENSION DISCOURAGES: COOPERATION, EXPERIMENTATION: because players want to use Resources and Abilities as efficiently as possible. BALANCES: DYNAMIC ALLIANCES .
  9. INCOMPATIBLE GOALS: Two or more goals that cannot be fulfilled simultaneously due to mutually exclusive end conditions. PREVENTING GOALS: Goal where the objective is to prevent the completion of another goal. REWARDS: Especially INDVIDUAL REWARDS
  10. Depends on whether there is CONFLICT. DIRECT: Competitors engage with each other. AGGRESSIVE, DESTRUCTIVE but EMOTIONALLY ENGAGING. KING OF THE HILL: a children's game in which the object is to beat one's rivals to the top of a mound or other high place, and to keep possession of the placINDIRECT: Competing against oneself,
  11. SYMMETRIC GOALS: Allow players to judge their CHANCE OF WINNING and create PLAYER BALANCE ASSYMETRIC GOALS: DIFFERENT STRATEGIES and VARIED GAMEPLAY. UNKNOWN GOALS: Allows for MASQUERADING one’s intentions. OUTCOME: Rewards, information, improved abilities, elimination, SOCIAL STATUS for winner or loser.
  12. PLAYER KILLING is PLAYER ELIMINATION with the SPAWNING of Player’s Avatars allowed. EXAMPLE: ULTIMA ONLINE was notorious for player’s killing other players and then looting them. EXAMPLE: QUAKE DEATHMATCH
  13. Encourages: TENSION
  14. PENALTIES: DECREASED ABILITIES, ABILITY LOSSES, OWNERSHIP LOSSES RESPAWN: FORCED DOWNTIME, RESPAWN LIMITATIONS FRIENDLY FIRE: Allows for CONSISTENT REALITY LOGIC but may cause INFIGHTING REWARDED: If Rewarded, even inadvertently, Players will kill other Players no matter what.
  15. Players can be put into situations where promises or expectations of other players can be broken, causing Friction between players. EXAMPLE: DIPLOMACY: Players can betray and backstab other players. EXAMPLE: INTRIGUE: Forces players into situations where they must betray another player due to making promises to pther players. REQUIRES: One player has COMMITTED GOALS whose completion is dependent on OTHER PLAYER’S ACTIONS. Can happen whenever players COOPERATE, especially toward MUTUAL GOALS.
  16. GOAL is often a MUTUAL GOAL
  17. TENSION between PLAYERS, as they try to find out what the other player’s intentions are. PROMOTES: Emotional Immersion Tension BALANCES: Anticipation Narrative Structure
  18. DELAYED EFFECT: Betrayal makes sense only if there is a delayed effect. Also, Do players have uncommitted alliances or stable ones? STABLE ALLIANCES: The effect of Betrayal is much more drastic. BALANCED BY: REWARDS?PENALTIES,
  19. Games with high social interaction rely on players able to collaborate and not just compete against each other.
  20. Cooperation allows players to divide goals between them and rely on each other’s abilities and resources. EXAMPLE: In PANDEMIC, 2-to-4 players work together to find 4 cures for a disease before the losing conditions are met. EXAMPLE: A SOCCER team has to work together to beat the opposing team. PROMOTES: SOCIAL INTERACTION as they coordinate their actions, CONSTRUCTIVE PLAY as players make use of COMPETENCE AREAS, SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS and SOCIAL DILEMMAS. Having COOPERATION and COMPETITION co-exist can increase TENSION, as does the possibility of BETRAYAL. BALANCES: TEAM PLAY: TENSION, DYNAMIC ALLIANCES CONFLICTS WITH: CONFLICT
  21. A
  22. SHARED RESOURCES: Sharing resources give players the opportunity to COOPERATE or go into CONFLICT on how to use them. MUTUAL GOALS: Creates incentives for players to work together. SHARED REWARDS: Causes players to perform better, be more strongly motivated, and more willing to engage in social interaction. There can be a TIME DELAY for mutual rewards.
  23. Some results may be determined by the wills of the players rather than the mechanics of the game. EXAMPLE: Tabletop RPGS, where the GAME MASTER is the ultimate decision-maker. EXAMPLE: Hide & Seek, where players maintain game state and decide results for themselves.
  24. Alliances differ from TEAM PLAY in that they do NOT necessarily involve COOPERATION but agreeing NOT TO INTERFERE. Usually occur where Players have an effect on the PROGRESS or GAME SITUATION of other Players. EXAMPLE: In CASTLE WOLFENSTEIN, there are TWO TEAMS with rules of conduct NOT TO SHOOT and try to HELP members of YOUR OWN TEAM. EXAMPLE: In CIVILIZATION a peaceful relationship creates an ALLIANCE. Players can belong to MANY DIFFERENT Alliances at a time. REQUIRES: SOCIAL INTERACTION unless GAME SYSTEM gives Alliances as an ACTION.
  25. PROMOTED BY: INDIVIDUAL REWARDS for completing goals that promote TEAM PLAY PROMOTES: Creates COLLABORATIVE ACTION and promotes CONSTRUCTIVE PLAY, PROMOTES: EMPOWERMENT by taking part in COLLABORATIVE ACTIONS that might otherwise be impossible. PROMOTES: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS with SOCIAL STATUSES, often with team members acquiring a HANDLE or having a COMPETENCE AREA. PROMOTES: TEAM DEVELOPMENT if teams are PERSISATANT PROMOTES: PLAYER DITRIBUTION OF REWARDS REQUIRES: TEAM BALANCE in addition to INDIVIDUAL BALANCE
  26. GOALS/ENEMIES: Motivation for Alliance. Alliances most make sense where there are INTERFERABLE GOALS and PLAYER-DECIDED RESULTS. RULES OF CONDUCT: Must be relevant to gameplay.
  27. Team Play is based on some form of COOPERATION. EXAMPLE: SOCCER, players have DIFFERENT ROLES and ABILITIES, and must coordinate their actions. EXAMPLE: RPGS, players have DIFFERENT ROES and ABILITIES too, complementing each other.
  28. UNITS: SIMULATED TEAM PLAY
  29. PROMOTED BY: INDIVIDUAL REWARDS for completing goals that promote TEAM PLAY PROMOTES: Creates COLLABORATIVE ACTION and promotes CONSTRUCTIVE PLAY, PROMOTES: EMPOWERMENT by taking part in COLLABORATIVE ACTIONS that might otherwise be impossible. PROMOTES: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS with SOCIAL STATUSES, often with team members acquiring a HANDLE or having a COMPETENCE AREA. PROMOTES: TEAM DEVELOPMENT if teams are PERSISATANT PROMOTES: PLAYER DITRIBUTION OF REWARDS REQUIRES: TEAM BALANCE in addition to INDIVIDUAL BALANCE
  30. MUTUAL GOAL: Rewards are often SHARED REWARDS. Penalties are also SHARED PENALTIES. There can also be PLAYER DISTRIBUTION OF REWARDS and PENALTIES. FORMATION: Those that form at the beginning are more STABLE. IMPORTANCE: Each team members needs ILLUSION OF SIGNIFICANCE through ASSYMETRIC or PRIVILEGED ABILITIES, designing Goals that require each Ability, Even if one player can achieve Goal, achievement might be easier if the player needs support. BALANCED BY: NEW/PRIVILEGED/SHARED ABILITIES< INDIVIDUAL/SHARED REWARDS, PLAYER KILLING,
  31. Games played in face-to-face situations tend to have social interacting between players even though the game itself would not require it.
  32. Trading is TRANSFER OF CONTROL of RESOURCES (including IN-GAME CURRENCY) between BUYER and SELLER. It is a COLLABORATIVE SOCIAL INTERACTION. EXAMPLE: LEGEND OF ZELDA, trade RUPEES for HEALTH and ITEMS EXAMPLE: SETTLERS OF CATAN, TRADING PHASE where players can trade 5 RESOURCES..
  33. . PROMOTES: SOCIAL INTERACTION, COOPERATION, FREEDOM OF CHOICE for exchange of OWNERSHIP OF RESOURCES, as well as COMPETITION for Resources. BALANCES: POWER-UPS, GAIN OWNERSHIP, RESOURCE OWNERSHIP
  34. RESOURCES: CURRENTY, INFORMATION, MATERIALS, ACTIONS, TOOLS INCENTIVE: Player might need different kinds of resources to progress but the basic production of the resources is not balanced. ASSYMETRIC RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION through RESOURCE GENERATORS or Player CONSTRUCTION ACTIONS. If there is SYMMETRIC RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION then there should be GEOMETRIC REWARDS FOR INVESTMENT in a single Resource. BALANCED BY NEGOTIATION, BETRAYAL, DELIVERY, BLUFFING< TIME LIMITS, etc. INITIATING: WHO is involved, WHEN can it happen, WHERE can it happen? BARGAINING: Optional, but brings about more SOCIAL INTERACTION. RESOLVING: Could include BETRAYAL, DELAYED EFFECTS and INTERRUPTABLE ACTIONS to STEAL or DESTROY Resources before they are Traded. There could also be a DELIVERY system. Trading of INDIRECT INFORMATION could involve BLUFFING. RANSOM: Exchange Resources for Release Action) GIFTS: One-sided Trading
  35. Players invest Resources with the hope to achieve a certain game state, the outcome of these investments is determined, and possible rewards are distributed. EXAMPLE: POKER, where Players bid on the value of their card hands. EXAMPLE: RETURN TO CASTLE WOLFENSTEIN: ENEMY TERRITORY requires that a certain amount of players vote to kick out a player. REQUIRES: LIMITED RESOURCES
  36. PROMOTES PLAYER-DEFINED GOALS on how much Resources one wants to spend as well as what Objects to get ALTERNATE STRATEGY TO COMBAT for GAIN OWNERHIP and ELIMINATE Goals.
  37. BIDS: OPEN BIDDING: Players have SYMMETRIC INFORMATION about the AMOUNT of Resources the other Players have BID. CLOSED BIDDING: ASSYMETRIC INFORMATION. ORDER: Often down in ROUNDS, or it can be done SIMULTANEOUSLY OUTCOME: The POT is a REWARD and who wins it is determined in another way. (POKER). Assumes Player DIDS ARE CONSUMED or TRANSFERRED. The reward is specified OUTSIDE of BIDDING and the bidding is used to DETERMINE OUTCOME. (VOTING, AUCTIONS). Only the player GETTING REWARD LOSES BID. AUCTION: REWARD given to the person who has the highest bid. VOTING: Majority of votes decide how Game State will change.
  38. EXAMPLE: POKER: Players give false social clues about their hand. EXAMPLE: DIPLOMACY: Players have all information about positions of armies and fleets but players can give fale information about strategies, goals and agreements between players. REQUIRES: ASSYMETRIC INFORMATION about Game Components with means for Players to give INDIRECT INFORMATION about them, usually via SOCIAL INTERACTION PROMOTED BY: NEGOTIATIONS
  39. Risk/Reward Emotional Immersion Tension TENSION: Uncertainty about Results
  40. ASSEMETRIC INFORMATION INDIRECT COMMUNICATIONS REWARS/PENALTIES: Basis for RISK ASSESSMENT
  41. EXAMPLE: The Goal of CHECKERS is to Eliminate the other player’s pieces. EXAMPLE: in COUNTER-STRIKE players who are killed are eliminated. .
  42. Common Eliminate goals are to destroy a Resource Generator or defeat a Boss Monster to advance.
  43. Also speeds up and simplifies gameplay at the End Phase through removal of game elements.
  44. ELEMENT: Usually an object controlled by a PLAYER or SYSTEM, making this a variation of OVERCOME. HOW: COMBAT is the most common way to achieve Eliminate goals, although it can be done through other means: such as FOLDING in POKER. Also, TOURNAMENTS contain the eliminate pattern. PERMANENT: Even if TEMPORARY, involves some kind of PENALTY, such as returning to a SPAWN POINT or taking it OUT OF PLAY for a TIME.
  45. FIND LOCATION and OVERCOME OBSTACLES. Often has a BOSS BATTLE as a final element. EXAMPLE: DONKEY KONG EXAMPLE: COUNTER-STRIKE: Mission to rescue hostages. REQUIRES: OVERCOME GUARD to promote CONFLICT. PROMOTES: STEALTH and OVERCOME GOALS, NARRATIVE STRUCTURE. .
  46. WHAT/WHO: CHARACTER or UNIT OBSTACLES.: GUARDS, DEADLY TRAPS, ALARMS, BOSS MONSTERS. SAFE AREA: SAFE HAVEN. OTHER GOALS: Gives FREEDOM OF CHOICE.
  47. Games played in face-to-face situations tend to have social interacting between players even though the game itself would not require it.
  48. Negotiations are specific MODES OF PLAY where Players have to agree on something. The Negotiations can uncontrolled by the Game System or have formalized rules. EXAMPLE: DIPLOMACY has a specific diplomacy phases during which players are able to negotiate alliances and coordinate actions. EXAMPLE: SETTLERS OF CATAN has a Trading Phase where players can negotiate with each other about Trade.
  49. EXTRA-GAME: No rules need to be set up. INITIATED: WHO can initiate, how are PARTICIPANTS determined, WHAT can be negotiated. BARGAINING: Offers/Counteroffers. AGREEMENTS: Initiated player decides agreement is reached, the players who agree end the negotiation; some form of voting or bidding determines the outcome. THIRD PARTIES: Presenting an alternate bid or information about whether the bargain is not fair to one party. BREACHES:
  50. EXAMPLE: THE PRISONERS DILEMMA. How much do players trust each other? COOPERATION vs. BETRAYAL. EXAMPLE: THE TRAGEDIES OF THE COMMONS: When a resource (the commons) is shared, everyone can use it, but no one is responsible for protecting it. But if one person over-uses it for their benefit, it is destroyed for everyone. REQUIRES: INDIVIDUAL REWARDS but SHARED PENALTIES, with REWARDS OUTWEIGHING PENALTIES. Players agree on TIED RESULTS, but on e player receives ALL THE REWARDS. Social Organizations, where PENALTY is social rejection but REWARD is spending time on other activities. Enemies that are enemies due to misunderstandings that Players are aware of. PRISONERS DILEMMA: Requires DELAYED EFFECT for TENSION TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS: Requires SHARED and RENEWABLE RESOURCE that has a REWARD for use but has a RENEWAL LIMIT Use a CONVERTER to CREATE HIGHER LEVEL REWARDS (Such as a general using a shared city to create better troops for himself.
  51. PROMOTES: EMOTIONAL IMMERSION, RISK/REWARD DECISIONS, SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS, DYNAMIC ALLIANCES BALANCE: COOPERATION, COMPETITION, CHANCE TO SUCCEED CONFLICTS WITH: INDIVIDUAL PENALTIES .
  52. SHARED PENALTIES INDIVIDUAL REWARDS: Rewards should outweigh the penalties.