The document discusses Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) which provide a framework for conducting laboratory studies on chemicals and pharmaceuticals. It outlines that GLP were established to ensure quality, consistency and integrity of safety testing. The key points covered include:
- GLP applies to nonclinical safety studies for chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- They help assure regulators that submitted data accurately reflects study results
- Major events leading to their creation in response to fraud and misconduct in some laboratories
GLP applies to nonclinical studies conducted for the assessment of the safety or efficacy of chemicals (including pharmaceuticals).
GLP helps assure regulatory authorities that the data submitted are a true.
Good Manufacturing Practice is a set of regulations, codes, and guidelines for the manufacture of drug substances and drug products, medical devices, in vivo and in vitro diagnostic products, and foods.
GLP applies to nonclinical studies conducted for the assessment of the safety or efficacy of chemicals (including pharmaceuticals).
GLP helps assure regulatory authorities that the data submitted are a true.
Good Manufacturing Practice is a set of regulations, codes, and guidelines for the manufacture of drug substances and drug products, medical devices, in vivo and in vitro diagnostic products, and foods.
“A GMP is a system for ensuring that products are consistently produced and controlled according to quality standards. It is designed to minimize the risks involved in any pharmaceutical production that cannot be eliminated through testing the final product”.
One of the fundamental purposes of the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) is to ensure the quality and integrity of test data related to non-clinical safety studies. The way in which study data, supporting human, animal and environmental safety assessment, is generated, handled, reported, retained and archived has continued to evolve in line with the introduction and ongoing development of supporting technologies.
The PPT explain about the NABL and accreditation process according to the ISO 17025. And how you will get benefited with the NABL/ISO 17025 accreditation for your Lab.
“A GMP is a system for ensuring that products are consistently produced and controlled according to quality standards. It is designed to minimize the risks involved in any pharmaceutical production that cannot be eliminated through testing the final product”.
One of the fundamental purposes of the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) is to ensure the quality and integrity of test data related to non-clinical safety studies. The way in which study data, supporting human, animal and environmental safety assessment, is generated, handled, reported, retained and archived has continued to evolve in line with the introduction and ongoing development of supporting technologies.
The PPT explain about the NABL and accreditation process according to the ISO 17025. And how you will get benefited with the NABL/ISO 17025 accreditation for your Lab.
deals with biosafety in medical labs. universal safety precautions included. Includes updated 8 categories and colour coding for BMW management. Being a budding microbiologist, kept it focused on microbiology lab
1) GLP embodies a set of principles that provides a frame work within which laboratory studies are planned performed, monitored, and archived and reported.
2) WHY WAS GLP CREATED? • In the early 70’s FDA became aware of cases of poor laboratory practice all over the United States. • They discovered a lot fraudulent activities and a lot of poor lab practices. • Examples of some of these poor lab practices found were 1. Equipment not been calibrated to standard form , therefore giving wrong measurements. 2. Incorrect/inaccurate accounts of the actual lab study. 3. Inadequate test systems.
3) Purpose of GLPs: • GLP is to certify that every step of the analysis is valid or Not. • Assure the quality & integrity of data submitted to FDA in support of the safety of regulated products. • GLPs have heavy emphasis on data recording, record & specimen retention.
4)GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICES PRINCIPLES. 1. Test Facility Organisation and Personnel. 2. Quality Assurance Programme(QAP). 3. Facilities. 4. Apparatus, Material and Reagents. 5. Test systems. 6. Test and Reference Substances. 7. Standard Operating Procedures(SOP). 8. Performance of The Study. 9. Reporting of Study Results. 10. Storage and Retention of Records and materials.
5) GLP is a set of principles intended to assure the quality and integrity of non-clinical laboratory studies that are intended to support research or marketing permits for products regulated by government agencies.
6) "Good Laboratory Practice", or GLP for short, refers to a quality assurance system that is applied during the pre-clinical stage of research and development. Its aim is to test active ingredients under specific environmental conditions and over a defined period of time.
Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs) are standard regulatory programs that assure the quality and integrity of nonclinical safety test data submitted to regulatory agencies worldwide.
Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs) are standard regulatory programs that assure the quality and integrity of nonclinical safety test data submitted to regulatory agencies worldwide.
Good Laborarory Practices. Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) covers the organizational process and conditions under which clinical field studies are conducted, monitored, recorded and reported. GLP is carried out to improve quality of data for its international acceptance.
Good Laboratory Practices (GLP)
History
Reason behind GLP created
Advantages and disadvantages of GLP
Objectives of GLP
Practice of GLP
b pharma 6th sem
pharmaceutical quality assurance
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2. GLP ( Good laboratory
practices)
• Good laboratory practice or GLP specifically refers to a
quality system of management controls for research
laboratories and organizations to try to ensure the
uniformity, consistency, reliability, reproducibility, quality,
and integrity of chemical (including pharmaceuticals) non-
clinical safety tests; from physio-chemical properties through
acute to chronic toxicity tests.
• Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency-UK
which defines GLP as:
“Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) embodies a set of principles
that provides a framework within which laboratory studies
are planned, performed, monitored, recorded, reported and
archived”.
07/15/13 2
3. • GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE applies to
nonclinical studies conducted for the
assessment of the safety or efficacy of
chemicals (including pharmaceuticals).
• GLP helps assure regulatory authorities that
the data submitted are a true
07/15/13 3
4. HISTORY
• The term GLP was first used in New Zealand in 1972.
• GLP was instituted in US following cases of fraud generated
by toxicology labs in data submitted to the FDA by
pharmaceutical companies. As a result of these findings, FDA
promulgated the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Regulations,
21 CFR part 58, on December 22, 1978 (43 FR 59986). The
regulations became effective June 1979. Assure the quality
and integrity of safety Nonclinical laboratory studies
• In 1981 an organization named OECD (organization for
economic co-operation and development ) produced GLP
principles that are international standard.
07/15/13 4
5. Reason behind GLP creation
• In the early 70’s FDA became
aware of cases of poor laboratory
practice all over the United
States.
• FDA decided to do an in-depth
investigation on 40 toxicology
labs.
• They discovered a lot fraudulent
activities and a lot of poor lab
practices.
• Examples of some of these poor
lab practices found were
1. Equipment not been calibrated to
standard form , therefore giving
wrong measurements.
2. Incorrect/inaccurate accounts of
the actual lab study
3. Inadequate test systems
07/15/13 5
6. Reason behind GLP creation
One of the labs that went under
such an investigation made
headline news.
The name of the Lab was Industrial
Bio Test. This was a big lab that ran
tests for big companies such as
Procter and Gamble.
It was discovered that mice that
they had used to test cosmetics
such as lotion and deodorants had
developed cancer and died.
Industrial Bio Test lab threw the
dead mice and covered results
deeming the products good for
human consumption.
Those involved in production,
distribution and sales for the lab
eventually served jail time07/15/13 6
7. OBJECTIVES OF GLP
GLP makes sure that the data submitted are a true
reflection of the results that are obtained during the
study.
GLP also makes sure that data is traceable.
Promotes international acceptance of tests.
07/15/13 7
8. Basic elements in GLP
• Personnel
Sponsor
Management
Study director
Quality Assurance
• Facility
Laboratory Operation
Animal care
Equipment
Reagents
Storage
07/15/13 8
• Documents
Standard Operating
Protocols
Reports
Archiving
• Test and Control Articles
Characterization
Handling
Storage
9. Personnel
• Qualification of personnel:
The assumptions is that in order to conduct GLP studies with
right quality a couple of things are important;
1)There should be sufficient .
2)The personnel should be qualified.
• Sponsor:
Sponsor: person who initiates & supports nonclinical
laboratory study, a person who submits nonclinical study to
FDA or testing facility that initiates & conducts the study.
• Facility management:
Responsibilities of facility management is well defined. They
designate a study director, as well as assure quality assurance
unit is available, test and control articles are characterized.
07/15/13 9
10. • Study director:
He has overall responsibilities for technical conduct safety
studies, as well as interpretation, analysis, documentation
and reporting of results.
• Quality Assurance unit:
The quality assurance unit (QAU) serves an internal control
function. It is responsible for monitoring each study to assure
management that facilities, equipment, personnel, methods,
practices, records, controls, SOPs, final reports (for data
integrity), and archives are in conformance with the
GLP/GALP
07/15/13 10
11. Maintenance & Calibration of
Equipment
• Equipment shall be adequately inspected, cleaned &
maintained
• Equipment used for assessment of data shall be tested,
calibrated and/or standardized
• Scales & balances should be calibrated at regular intervals
(usually ranging from 1-12 months)
07/15/13 11
12. Reagent/ Materials
Certification
This policy is to assure that reagents used are specified in the
standard operating procedure.
Purchasing and testing should be handled by a quality
assurance program.
Requirements:
Reagents and solutions shall be labeled
Deteriorated or outdated reagents and solutions shall not be
used
Include Date opened
Stored under ambient temperature
Expiration date
07/15/13 12
13. Standard Operating
Procedures (SOP)
Written procedures for a laboratories program.
They define how to carry out protocol-specified activities.
Most often written in a chronological listing of action steps.
They are written to explain how the procedures are suppose
to work
Routine inspection, cleaning, maintenance, testing and
calibration.
Actions to be taken in response to equipment failure.
Analytical methods
Definition of raw data
Keeping records, reporting, storage, mixing, and retrieval of
data07/15/13 13
14. Statistical Procedures for
Data Evaluation
Statistical procedures are not simply chosen from a text book
Practitioners in a particular field may adopt certain standards
which are deemed acceptable within that field.
Regulatory agencies often describe acceptable statistical
procedures.
07/15/13 14
15. Test and control articles
• Control articles or reference substances as they re-called in
the OECD principles are of utmost importance as they are
commonly used to calibrate the instrument.
• Main requirements for control articles are: the identity,
strength, purity, composition and other characteristics should
be determined for each batch and documented.
• The stability of each test and articles should also be
determined.
• Certified reference standards can be purchased from
appropriate suppliers. If standards are not available , the
recommendation is to take a lot of your own material and
analyze, certify and use it as the standard.
07/15/13 15
16. Analyst Certification
Some acceptable proof of satisfactory training
and/or competence with specific laboratory
procedures must be established for each analyst.
Qualification can come from education, experience
or additional trainings, but it should be documented
Sufficient people
Requirements of certification vary
07/15/13 16
17. Laboratory Certification
Normally done by an external agency
Evaluation is concerned with issues such as
Adequate space
Ventilation
Storage
Hygiene
07/15/13 17
18. Documentation and
Maintenance of Records
Maintenance of all records provide documentation
which may be required in the event of legal
challenges due to repercussions of decisions based
on the original analytical results.
General guidelines followed in regulated laboratories
is to maintain records for at least five years
Length of time over which laboratory records should
be maintained will vary with the situation
07/15/13 18
19. If work place doesn’t
comply wIth fda Glp
standards
07/15/13 19
20. Disqualification of a Facility
Before a workplace can experience the
consequences of noncompliance, an
explanation of disqualification is needed
The FDA states the purpose of disqualification
as the exclusion of a testing facility from
completing laboratory studies or starting any
new studies due to not following the
standards of compliance set by the Good
Laboratory Practice manual
07/15/13 20
21. Possible Violations
Falsifying information for permit, registration
or any required records
Falsifying information related to testing~
protocols, ingredients, observations, data
equipment, etc.
Failure to prepare, retain, or submit written
records required by law
07/15/13 21
22. Consequences of
Noncompliance
The FDA states the following consequences of
noncompliance:
The commissioner will send a written proposal of
disqualification to the testing facility
A regulatory hearing on the disqualification will be
scheduled
If the commissioner finds that after the hearing, the
facility has complied, then a written statement with an
explanation of termination of disqualification will be sent
to the facility
Thus, if it can be shown that such disqualifications did not
affect the integrity and outcome of the study itself, or did
not occur at all, then the study may be reinstated at the
will of the commissioner07/15/13 22
23. Upon Disqualification…
• If the commissioner finds that the facility was noncompliant
on any of the grounds after the hearing, then a final order of
noncompliance will be sent to the facility with explanations
• If a testing facility has been disqualified, any studies done
before of after the disqualification will need to be
determined as essential to a decision (acceptable or not)
• If the study is determined unacceptable, then the facility
itself may need to show that the study was not affected by
the noncompliance that led to the disqualification
• Once finally disqualified, the facility may not receive or be
considered for a research or marketing permit and the study
is rejected.
07/15/13 23
24. • The commissioner may notify the public and all
interested persons, including other federal agencies
the facility may have contacted
• The FDA may ask the other agencies to consider
whether to support the facility or not under the
disqualification
• The FDA may turn it over to the federal, state or local
law enforcement
• The facility’s sponsor may terminate or suspend the
facility from doing any non- clinical study for a permit
• The sponsor is required to notify the FDA in writing
within 15 working days that the facility is to be
suspended or terminated and why
07/15/13 24
25. Reinstatement of a
Disqualified Facility
The testing facility may be reinstated as acceptable
non-clinical study to be turned into the FDA if the
commissioner can be certain that future studies will
be conducted in compliance with the Good
Laboratory Practice standards and that any current
studies integrity have not been severely harmed by
the disqualification
The disqualified facility will be required to put in
writing to the commissioner reasons why it should
be reinstated and any actions the facility will take or
have taken to assure any disqualification problems
will not happen again
07/15/13 25
26. The commissioner will inspect the facility and
determine if it shall be reinstated
If it is reinstated, the commissioner is required to
notify all persons that were notified of the
disqualification including the facility itself
07/15/13 26