Fluid Responsiveness in Critically ill Patients

Ubaidur Rahaman
Senior Resident, CCM, SGPGIMS
Lucknow, India
FLUID RESPSONSIVENSS

Definition:
fluid responsiveness denotes an increase in cardiac index
after infusion of a fluid either crystalloid or colloid.

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
FLUID RESUSCITATION
3 DIFFERENT SCENARIO

Patients in the ERS for acute blood losses or body fluid losses
No therapeutic dilemma regarding hypovolemia

Patients in the ERS for high suspicion of septic shock
EGDT- volume resuscitation mandatory in first 6 hours- mortality benefit

Patients in the ICU,
already resuscitated for several hours or days
Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
Patients in the ICU, already resuscitated for several hours or days

• hemodynamic instability requiring therapy
• Cumulative fluid balance
• Risk of pulmonary oedema/ raised IAP

•? Fluid responsiveness

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
Cumulative fluid balance and mortality

Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated
central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality.
Crit Care Med 2011 Vol. 39, No. 2; John H. Boyd, Jason Forbes, MD; Taka-aki Nakada, Keith R. Walley,
James A. Russell,

retrospective review of the use of intravenous fluids during the first 4 days of care.
Patients: VASST study enrolled 778 patients
septic shock and receiving a minimum of 5 ug of norepinephrine per minute.

A more positive fluid balance both early in resuscitation and cumulatively over
4 days is associated with an increased risk of mortality in septic shock.
Central venous pressure may be used to gauge fluid balance <12 hrs into septic shock but
becomes an unreliable marker of fluid balance thereafter.
Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
to give or not to give????

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
Assessment OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS

PRELOAD DEPENDENCE

PRELOAD

CONTRACTILITY

CARDIAC INDEX

Both ventricles should be preload dependent
Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
Assessment of PRELOAD is not
assessment of PRELOAD DEPENDENCE

normal heart

Stroke volume

preload-dependence
preload-

failing heart
preload-independence
preload-

Ventricular preload
Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
ASSESSMENT OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS

ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD
•Filling pressures- CVP, Pawp
•Filling volumes- LVEDV/ RVEDV
•VENACAVAL DIAMETER- variation with respiration
•RAP - inspiratory fall
ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE

•Response to fluid challenge
•Prediction of preload dependence:
PPV induced variation in CI parameters

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD
Filling pressures

oCentral Venous Pressure
oPulmonary artery Wedge Pressure

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
Central Venous Pressure

VR

CVP

Function of

CARDIAC PUMP

VR- function of

•MCFP
•Vs
•Venous resistance
VR- venous return; MCFP- mean capillary filling pressure
Vs- stressed volume
Mean Capillary filling pressure
(MCFP)

V

Vs

Vu

P
Vs- Stressed volume; Vu- unstressed volume

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
Central Venous Pressure

Venous function and central venous pressure. A physiologic story.
Simon Gelman. Anesthesiology 2008;108:735-48
C.O.

is determined by

intersection

RETURN FUNCTION

of

CARDIAC FUNCTION

Q

Q

Pra

Pra

Q

Pra
How to use CVP measurements. Magder S. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2005, 11:264—270
CONCEPT OF LIMIT

Q
Limit of “RETURN FUNCTION”

Lowering Pra will not
increase VR

Limit of “CARDIAC FUNCTION”

Increasing Pra will not
Increase C.O.

Pra

How to use CVP measurements. Magder S. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2005, 11:264—270
Is CVP a misleading variable?

Body does everything to maintain homeostasis
adequate transmural pressure
MCFP
more accurate measurement of volume status- difficult to measure
Ppawp
is an even worse indicator than CVP as it is far removed from the action of MCFP
RAP and Ppaw
do not always reflect true transmural pressure in patients on PEEP, increased IAP

“The correlation between CVP and circulating blood volume has never been found
simply because it does not exist”

Venous function and central venous pressure. A physiologic story.
Simon Gelman. Anesthesiology 2008;108:735-48
Does Central Venous Pressure predicts fluid responsiveness?
A systemic review of literature and the tale of seven mares.
Paul E. Marik, M. Baram, B. Vahid. Chest 2008;134:172-178

Expansive literature search to identify all trials evaluating the relationship between
2.

1. CVP & blood volume
association between CVP or Δ CVP and fluid responsiveness

– 24 studies identified
– 5 comparing CVP with measured blood volume;
-19 studied relationship between CVP/ΔCVP & change in cardiac
performance after fluid challenge

Poor correlation between
•CVP and blood volume
•CVP or ∆CVP and homodynamic response to fluid challenge
overall 56% patients responded to fluid challenge
predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of evidences.
Frédéric Michard and Jean-Louis Teboul. Chest 2002;121;2000-2008

From medline (since 1966) Twelve studies were analyzed in which the parameters tested
were as follows:
(1) static Indicators: RAP, PAOP, RVEDV, LVEDA;
(2) dynamic parameters: inspiratory decrease in RAP, ddown, PPV, aortic blood
velocity(Vpeak)
Before fluid infusion, static indicators were not significantly lower in responders
than in nonresponders.
When a significant difference was found, no threshold value could discriminate
responders and nonresponders.

Before fluid infusion, inspiratory variation in RAP,SPV ddown, PPV, and Vpeak
were significantly higher in responders.
Positive predictive value: 77- 95%, negative predictive value: 81- 100%
ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD
Filling Volumes

o RVEDV
o LVEDV
Assessment OF PRELOAD

Respiratory variation in VENACVAL DIAMETER

Spontaneous breathing

Negative pleural pressure---- increased VR---- collapse of IVC

Positive pressure ventilation

Positive pleural pressure---increased RA pressure---decreased VR
IVC- extrathoracic course--- increased transmural pressure---- distend
SVC- intrathoracic course--- decreased transmural pressure----collapse

This variation is affected by intravascular volume ( hydrostatic pressure)
Less intravascular volume--- more variation
Assessment OF PRELOAD

Respiratory variation in VENACVAL DIAMETER
SPONTNEOUS BREATHING Patient
IVC collapsibility index ≥ 50% is strongly associated with low CVP
Emergency department bedside ultrasonographic measurement of caval index for noninvasive
Determination of low central venous pressure.
Nagdev AD, Merchant RC, Murphy MC. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;55(3):290-5

In healthy subjects inspiration decreased IVC diameter by approx. 50%.
This cyclic change is abolished in high volume status, right ventricular failure, cardiac tamponade.
Applied Physiology in Intensive care Medicine. Pinsky, Mancebo. page 145

Could be affected by manner of respiration

Could be affected by raised IAP
Assessment OF PRELOAD

Respiratory variation in VENACVAL DIAMETER

POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATED PATIENTS
IVC distensibility index ( DDIVC) ≥ 12% predictive of increase in C.I. by at least 15%
Positive predictive value- 93 %, negative predictive value- 92%
DDivc=(Dmax-Dmin)/ mean of 2 values

The respiratory variation in inferior venacava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy.
Feissel M, Michard F. Inten Car Med 2004;30:1834-7

IVC distensibility index (dIVC) ≥ 18% predictive of increase in C.I. of at least 15%
Sensitivity-90%, Specificity-90%

divc=(Dmax-Dmin)/ Dmin

Respiratory changes in inferior venacava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid
responsiveness in ventilated septic patients.
Barbier C, Jardin F. Inten Car Med 2004;30:1740-6
Assessment OF PRELOAD

Respiratory variation in VENACVAL DIAMETER

POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATED PATIENTS

Could be affected by raised IAP
Assessment OF PRELOAD

Respiratory variation in VENACVAL DIAMETER

POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATED PATIENTS

Could be affected by raised IAP
Assessment OF PRELOAD
Respiratory variation in VENACVAL DIAMETER

POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATED PATIENTS
SVC collapsibility index ≥ 36% identified preload responders.
Sensitivity- 90%, specificity- 100%

dSVC= (Dmax-Dmin)/ Dmax

Superior venacaval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated
septic patients.
Vieillard Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A. Inten Care med 2004;30;1734-9
Not affected by raised IAP
Assessment OF PRELOAD

Inspiratory fall in right atrial pressure

Respiratory variation in RAP predicts the response to fluid challenge.
Magder S, Geoorgiadis G, Cheong T. J Crit Care 1992; 7:76-85

13 of 14 patients had no fall in RAPC.O. not increased with fluid challenge

16 of 19 patients who had a fall in RAP ≥ 1 mmHgC.O. increased by> 250 ml/ min with fluid challenge

Sufficient inspiratory effort to lower Ppaw by 2 mmHg
Assessment OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE

FLUID CHALLENGE

PREDICTION BY PPV induced
RESPIRATORY VARIATION
IN
C.I. RELATED PARAMETERS

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
Assessment OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE

Response to FLUID CHALLENGE
change in filling pressures- CVP, RAP, Pawp
change in perfusion markers- C.O., MAP, CFT, ABG, SCVO2, B. lactate

Disadvantages
pulmonary edema
excessive cumulative fluid balance

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
Assessment of PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE

Spontaneously breathing patients
PLR- ∆ stroke volume/ pulse pressure

Positive pressure ventilated patients
PLR- ∆ stroke volume/ pulse pressure
Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac indexSPV, SVV, PPV, pulse oxymetry plathysmography waveform variation,
Aortic blood flow velocity, aortic velocity time integral, aortic pre-ejection period
Respiratory systolic variation test ( RSVT)
end expiratory occlusion test
Assessment of PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE

PASSIVE LEG RAISING
Venous blood shift

(Rutlen et al. 1981, Reich et al. 1989)
1981,

45
°

Transient and reversible effect
Assessment of PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE

PLR

Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill
Xavier Monnet, Mario Rienzo, David Osman, Nadia Anguel, C. Richard,
Michael R. Pinsky, Jean-Louis Teboul, Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402–1407

71 mechanically ventilated patients considered for volume expansion.
31 patients had spontaneous breathing activity and/or arrhythmias.

homodynamic status assessed
at baseline, after PLR, after volume expansion (500 mL NaCl 0.9% infusion over 10 mins)

In both groups, PLR induced increase in aortic blood flow ≥10% predicted
volume expansion induced increase in aortic blood flow ≥15%
(sensitivity- 97%, specificity 94%)
Assessment of PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE- PLR

Immediate effect of PLR following induction of anesthesia for cardiac surgery in
18 patients
Baseline

PLR

Change
(%)

Cardiac output
( l/min)

4.5± 1.1

5.7 ± 1.1

23

PAOP ( mmHg)

12.9 ± 4.5

14.1± 4.8

10

SPV ( mmHg)

11.3 ± 5.1

5.9 ± 2.4

48

dDown ( mmHg)

7.5 ± 3.7

3.3 ± 2

56

Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Pinsky and Payen, page 318
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Positive pressure ventilation induced change in parameters related to
cardiac index

Paw
Ppl

PAlv
Palv

Transmural pressure
cardiac chambers/ great
vesseles

Filling gradient
of LV no effect

Transpulmonary
pressure
alveoli

Filling
gradient of RV

PVR

RV
preload

LV stroke
volume

Pulmonary
Transit time

Zone 3 to
zone 2/1
formation

RV
afterload

RV stroke
volume

Mainly responsible
for change in
stroke volume

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Positive pressure ventilation change in parameters related to
cardiac index

Paw
Ppl

Palv

Transmural pressure

Transpulmonary
pressure alveoli

cardiac chambers

LV afterload

squeezing of
blood out of

alveolar vesseles

LV preload

LV stroke
volume
Predominant mechanism
in LV systolic dysfunction

Predominant mechanism
in hypervolemia

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Positive pressure ventilation induced change in parameters related to
cardiac index

RV preload
RV ejection
Pleural
pressure

Pumonary
transit time

LV preload

RV afterload
LV ejection

transpulmonary
pressure

LV afterload
LV ejection
LV preload

Aortic velocity
Stroke volume
Systolic B.P.
Pulse Pressure
Aortic velocity
Stroke volume
Systolic B.P.
Pulse Pressure

MINIMUM AT END OF EXPIRATION

MAXIMUM AT END OF INSPIRATION

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index

SYSTOLIC PRESSURE VARIATION- SPV
PROPOSED BY COYLE IN 1983

dup
inspiratory increase in systolic pressure:
increased LV Stroke volumeincreased preload
decreased afterload
Increase in extramural aortic pressure

Ddown
Expiratory decrease in systolic pressure:
decrease in LV stroke volumedecrease in preload
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index

SYSTOLIC PRESSURE VARIATION- SPV

Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with
sepsis induced hypotension
Taverneir B, Dupont J. Anesthesiology 1998, 89:1313-1321

ddown- threshold value of 5 mmHg was associated with
Increase in stroke volume ≥ 15%
Positive predictive value- 95%, Negative predictive value- 93%

dup- increase in hypervolemia and LVF
ddown-not increased in RVF despite hypovolemia
In the presence of large dup, the PPV, SPV and SVV will be less effective
in predicting fluid responsiveness

*cardiovascular monitoring Chapter 32, page 1327, Miller’s Anesthesia 7th edi
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index

PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV

PPmax-PPmin
PPV=

PPmax+PPmin/2
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index

PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV

Relation between Respiratory Changes in Arterial Pulse Pressure and Fluid
Responsiveness in Septic Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure
F. MICHARD, S. BOUSSAT, D. CHEMLA, NADIA ANGUEL, MICHAEL R. PINSKY, and JEAN-LOUIS TEBOUL

Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 162. pp 134–138, 2000

Baseline

VE

11o± 22

106 ± 21

MAP

69 ± 13

90 ± 13

Pra

9±3

12 ± 4

10 ± 3

14 ± 3

24 ± 6

29 ± 6

3.6 ±
0.9

4.0 ± 0.9

14 ± 10

7±5

9±6

6±4

HR

(beats/min)

(mmHg)

Pcwp
Ppa
CI

(mmHg)

(mmHg)

(l/min/m2)

∆PPV
∆SPV

(%)
(%)

Threshold value of 13% was
associated with increase in
C.I. ≥ 15% in response to
volume expansion
Sensitivity- 94%, specificity96%
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index

PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index

PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV

PPV better predictor than other SV derived variables

Inspiratory increase
in pleural pressure
increase in SPV
Increase in extra-mural
pressure

Equal increase in
Systolic pressure
And
Diastolic pressure
no change in PPV

Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index

RESPIRATORY SYSTOLIC VARIATION TEST ( RSVT)

RSVT slope 0.24 mmHg/ cmH2O
predicted
change in CI of 15%

RSVT slope

Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters
including the Respiratory Systollic Variation Test and static preload indicators.
Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, et al Br J Anaesth 2005;95:746–55
“since during critical illness maintenance of the cardiac output
may depend upon right ventricular function, the clinician need to
be able to discern the presence of right ventricular dysfunction…”
William Hurford, 1988

Presence of fluid responsiveness is not an
indication by itself to administer fluids
It is commonly said that a teacher fails
if he has not been surpassed by his students
-Edmond H. Fischer
o PPV
Pulse pressure depends on stroke volume and arterial compliance
Change in compliance may affect degree of PPV induced by increase in
stroke volume
Elderly- stiff arteries--- small increase in stroke volume--- large PPV
Young healthy adult- large increase in stroke volume – relatively small PPV
CVP
o Effect of pleural pressure
o Effect of PEEP on pleural pressure
less than half of PEEP is transmitted to the pleural space
even less than that in pathological condition that require higher PEEP--- ARDS
PEEP – <=10 cm H2O = 8 mmHg----- change in pleural pressure—2-3 mmHg
but at PEEP>10 changes in pleural pressure at end expiration become significant

o Effect of forced expiration on pleural
pressure
Respiratory change in pleural
pressure
o Respiratory change in Pcwp
o Respiratory change in esophageal
pressure
Fluid challenge
o

o
o
o

Rapidity of fluid infusion is important- faster the fluid is given,
lesser the amount to be given
type of fluid- crystalloid or colloid does not matter
Change in CVP and not the volume of infusion that is important
Blood pressure is not a good guide as to whether C.O.
increased with fluid infusion
In ¾ patients in whom C.O. increased there was no increase in
B.P. ( Bafaqeeh F, Magder S. CVP and volume responsiveness of cardiac output. Am J
Respir Crit Car Med 2004, 169: A 343
Role of echocardiography
Assessment of inadequate resuscitation:
o
o

Volume status and responsiveness – fluid resuscitation
Cardiac contractility -- ionotrope
Effect of Positive Pressure Mechanical Ventilation on Hemodynamics
PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV

contribution of transmission of pleural pressure
effect on both systolic as well as diastolic pressure equally
Determination of aortic pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation in man.
Denault, Gasior, Pinsky, Gorscan, Mandarino. Chest 2000;116:176-186

Fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients

  • 1.
    Fluid Responsiveness inCritically ill Patients Ubaidur Rahaman Senior Resident, CCM, SGPGIMS Lucknow, India
  • 2.
    FLUID RESPSONSIVENSS Definition: fluid responsivenessdenotes an increase in cardiac index after infusion of a fluid either crystalloid or colloid. Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 3.
    FLUID RESUSCITATION 3 DIFFERENTSCENARIO Patients in the ERS for acute blood losses or body fluid losses No therapeutic dilemma regarding hypovolemia Patients in the ERS for high suspicion of septic shock EGDT- volume resuscitation mandatory in first 6 hours- mortality benefit Patients in the ICU, already resuscitated for several hours or days Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 4.
    Patients in theICU, already resuscitated for several hours or days • hemodynamic instability requiring therapy • Cumulative fluid balance • Risk of pulmonary oedema/ raised IAP •? Fluid responsiveness Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 5.
    Cumulative fluid balanceand mortality Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011 Vol. 39, No. 2; John H. Boyd, Jason Forbes, MD; Taka-aki Nakada, Keith R. Walley, James A. Russell, retrospective review of the use of intravenous fluids during the first 4 days of care. Patients: VASST study enrolled 778 patients septic shock and receiving a minimum of 5 ug of norepinephrine per minute. A more positive fluid balance both early in resuscitation and cumulatively over 4 days is associated with an increased risk of mortality in septic shock. Central venous pressure may be used to gauge fluid balance <12 hrs into septic shock but becomes an unreliable marker of fluid balance thereafter. Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 6.
    to give ornot to give???? Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 7.
    Assessment OF FLUIDRESPONSIVENESS PRELOAD DEPENDENCE PRELOAD CONTRACTILITY CARDIAC INDEX Both ventricles should be preload dependent Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 8.
    Assessment of PRELOADis not assessment of PRELOAD DEPENDENCE normal heart Stroke volume preload-dependence preload- failing heart preload-independence preload- Ventricular preload Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 9.
    ASSESSMENT OF FLUIDRESPONSIVENESS ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD •Filling pressures- CVP, Pawp •Filling volumes- LVEDV/ RVEDV •VENACAVAL DIAMETER- variation with respiration •RAP - inspiratory fall ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE •Response to fluid challenge •Prediction of preload dependence: PPV induced variation in CI parameters Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 10.
    ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD Fillingpressures oCentral Venous Pressure oPulmonary artery Wedge Pressure Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 11.
    Central Venous Pressure VR CVP Functionof CARDIAC PUMP VR- function of •MCFP •Vs •Venous resistance VR- venous return; MCFP- mean capillary filling pressure Vs- stressed volume
  • 12.
    Mean Capillary fillingpressure (MCFP) V Vs Vu P Vs- Stressed volume; Vu- unstressed volume Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 13.
    Central Venous Pressure Venousfunction and central venous pressure. A physiologic story. Simon Gelman. Anesthesiology 2008;108:735-48
  • 14.
    C.O. is determined by intersection RETURNFUNCTION of CARDIAC FUNCTION Q Q Pra Pra Q Pra How to use CVP measurements. Magder S. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2005, 11:264—270
  • 15.
    CONCEPT OF LIMIT Q Limitof “RETURN FUNCTION” Lowering Pra will not increase VR Limit of “CARDIAC FUNCTION” Increasing Pra will not Increase C.O. Pra How to use CVP measurements. Magder S. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2005, 11:264—270
  • 16.
    Is CVP amisleading variable? Body does everything to maintain homeostasis adequate transmural pressure MCFP more accurate measurement of volume status- difficult to measure Ppawp is an even worse indicator than CVP as it is far removed from the action of MCFP RAP and Ppaw do not always reflect true transmural pressure in patients on PEEP, increased IAP “The correlation between CVP and circulating blood volume has never been found simply because it does not exist” Venous function and central venous pressure. A physiologic story. Simon Gelman. Anesthesiology 2008;108:735-48
  • 17.
    Does Central VenousPressure predicts fluid responsiveness? A systemic review of literature and the tale of seven mares. Paul E. Marik, M. Baram, B. Vahid. Chest 2008;134:172-178 Expansive literature search to identify all trials evaluating the relationship between 2. 1. CVP & blood volume association between CVP or Δ CVP and fluid responsiveness – 24 studies identified – 5 comparing CVP with measured blood volume; -19 studied relationship between CVP/ΔCVP & change in cardiac performance after fluid challenge Poor correlation between •CVP and blood volume •CVP or ∆CVP and homodynamic response to fluid challenge overall 56% patients responded to fluid challenge
  • 18.
    predicting fluid responsivenessin ICU patients: A critical analysis of evidences. Frédéric Michard and Jean-Louis Teboul. Chest 2002;121;2000-2008 From medline (since 1966) Twelve studies were analyzed in which the parameters tested were as follows: (1) static Indicators: RAP, PAOP, RVEDV, LVEDA; (2) dynamic parameters: inspiratory decrease in RAP, ddown, PPV, aortic blood velocity(Vpeak) Before fluid infusion, static indicators were not significantly lower in responders than in nonresponders. When a significant difference was found, no threshold value could discriminate responders and nonresponders. Before fluid infusion, inspiratory variation in RAP,SPV ddown, PPV, and Vpeak were significantly higher in responders. Positive predictive value: 77- 95%, negative predictive value: 81- 100%
  • 20.
    ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD FillingVolumes o RVEDV o LVEDV
  • 21.
    Assessment OF PRELOAD Respiratoryvariation in VENACVAL DIAMETER Spontaneous breathing Negative pleural pressure---- increased VR---- collapse of IVC Positive pressure ventilation Positive pleural pressure---increased RA pressure---decreased VR IVC- extrathoracic course--- increased transmural pressure---- distend SVC- intrathoracic course--- decreased transmural pressure----collapse This variation is affected by intravascular volume ( hydrostatic pressure) Less intravascular volume--- more variation
  • 22.
    Assessment OF PRELOAD Respiratoryvariation in VENACVAL DIAMETER SPONTNEOUS BREATHING Patient IVC collapsibility index ≥ 50% is strongly associated with low CVP Emergency department bedside ultrasonographic measurement of caval index for noninvasive Determination of low central venous pressure. Nagdev AD, Merchant RC, Murphy MC. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;55(3):290-5 In healthy subjects inspiration decreased IVC diameter by approx. 50%. This cyclic change is abolished in high volume status, right ventricular failure, cardiac tamponade. Applied Physiology in Intensive care Medicine. Pinsky, Mancebo. page 145 Could be affected by manner of respiration Could be affected by raised IAP
  • 23.
    Assessment OF PRELOAD Respiratoryvariation in VENACVAL DIAMETER POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATED PATIENTS IVC distensibility index ( DDIVC) ≥ 12% predictive of increase in C.I. by at least 15% Positive predictive value- 93 %, negative predictive value- 92% DDivc=(Dmax-Dmin)/ mean of 2 values The respiratory variation in inferior venacava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Feissel M, Michard F. Inten Car Med 2004;30:1834-7 IVC distensibility index (dIVC) ≥ 18% predictive of increase in C.I. of at least 15% Sensitivity-90%, Specificity-90% divc=(Dmax-Dmin)/ Dmin Respiratory changes in inferior venacava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Barbier C, Jardin F. Inten Car Med 2004;30:1740-6
  • 24.
    Assessment OF PRELOAD Respiratoryvariation in VENACVAL DIAMETER POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATED PATIENTS Could be affected by raised IAP
  • 25.
    Assessment OF PRELOAD Respiratoryvariation in VENACVAL DIAMETER POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATED PATIENTS Could be affected by raised IAP
  • 26.
    Assessment OF PRELOAD Respiratoryvariation in VENACVAL DIAMETER POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATED PATIENTS SVC collapsibility index ≥ 36% identified preload responders. Sensitivity- 90%, specificity- 100% dSVC= (Dmax-Dmin)/ Dmax Superior venacaval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Vieillard Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A. Inten Care med 2004;30;1734-9 Not affected by raised IAP
  • 27.
    Assessment OF PRELOAD Inspiratoryfall in right atrial pressure Respiratory variation in RAP predicts the response to fluid challenge. Magder S, Geoorgiadis G, Cheong T. J Crit Care 1992; 7:76-85 13 of 14 patients had no fall in RAPC.O. not increased with fluid challenge 16 of 19 patients who had a fall in RAP ≥ 1 mmHgC.O. increased by> 250 ml/ min with fluid challenge Sufficient inspiratory effort to lower Ppaw by 2 mmHg
  • 28.
    Assessment OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE FLUID CHALLENGE PREDICTION BY PPV induced RESPIRATORY VARIATION IN C.I. RELATED PARAMETERS Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 29.
    Assessment OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Response to FLUID CHALLENGE change in filling pressures- CVP, RAP, Pawp change in perfusion markers- C.O., MAP, CFT, ABG, SCVO2, B. lactate Disadvantages pulmonary edema excessive cumulative fluid balance Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 30.
    Assessment of PRELOADDEPENDENCE PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE Spontaneously breathing patients PLR- ∆ stroke volume/ pulse pressure Positive pressure ventilated patients PLR- ∆ stroke volume/ pulse pressure Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac indexSPV, SVV, PPV, pulse oxymetry plathysmography waveform variation, Aortic blood flow velocity, aortic velocity time integral, aortic pre-ejection period Respiratory systolic variation test ( RSVT) end expiratory occlusion test
  • 31.
    Assessment of PRELOADDEPENDENCE PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE PASSIVE LEG RAISING Venous blood shift (Rutlen et al. 1981, Reich et al. 1989) 1981, 45 ° Transient and reversible effect
  • 32.
    Assessment of PRELOADDEPENDENCE PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE PLR Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill Xavier Monnet, Mario Rienzo, David Osman, Nadia Anguel, C. Richard, Michael R. Pinsky, Jean-Louis Teboul, Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402–1407 71 mechanically ventilated patients considered for volume expansion. 31 patients had spontaneous breathing activity and/or arrhythmias. homodynamic status assessed at baseline, after PLR, after volume expansion (500 mL NaCl 0.9% infusion over 10 mins) In both groups, PLR induced increase in aortic blood flow ≥10% predicted volume expansion induced increase in aortic blood flow ≥15% (sensitivity- 97%, specificity 94%)
  • 33.
    Assessment of PRELOADDEPENDENCE PREDICTION OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE- PLR Immediate effect of PLR following induction of anesthesia for cardiac surgery in 18 patients Baseline PLR Change (%) Cardiac output ( l/min) 4.5± 1.1 5.7 ± 1.1 23 PAOP ( mmHg) 12.9 ± 4.5 14.1± 4.8 10 SPV ( mmHg) 11.3 ± 5.1 5.9 ± 2.4 48 dDown ( mmHg) 7.5 ± 3.7 3.3 ± 2 56 Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Pinsky and Payen, page 318
  • 34.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Positive pressure ventilation induced change in parameters related to cardiac index Paw Ppl PAlv Palv Transmural pressure cardiac chambers/ great vesseles Filling gradient of LV no effect Transpulmonary pressure alveoli Filling gradient of RV PVR RV preload LV stroke volume Pulmonary Transit time Zone 3 to zone 2/1 formation RV afterload RV stroke volume Mainly responsible for change in stroke volume Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 35.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Positive pressure ventilation change in parameters related to cardiac index Paw Ppl Palv Transmural pressure Transpulmonary pressure alveoli cardiac chambers LV afterload squeezing of blood out of alveolar vesseles LV preload LV stroke volume Predominant mechanism in LV systolic dysfunction Predominant mechanism in hypervolemia Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 36.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Positive pressure ventilation induced change in parameters related to cardiac index RV preload RV ejection Pleural pressure Pumonary transit time LV preload RV afterload LV ejection transpulmonary pressure LV afterload LV ejection LV preload Aortic velocity Stroke volume Systolic B.P. Pulse Pressure Aortic velocity Stroke volume Systolic B.P. Pulse Pressure MINIMUM AT END OF EXPIRATION MAXIMUM AT END OF INSPIRATION Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 37.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index SYSTOLIC PRESSURE VARIATION- SPV PROPOSED BY COYLE IN 1983 dup inspiratory increase in systolic pressure: increased LV Stroke volumeincreased preload decreased afterload Increase in extramural aortic pressure Ddown Expiratory decrease in systolic pressure: decrease in LV stroke volumedecrease in preload
  • 38.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index SYSTOLIC PRESSURE VARIATION- SPV Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis induced hypotension Taverneir B, Dupont J. Anesthesiology 1998, 89:1313-1321 ddown- threshold value of 5 mmHg was associated with Increase in stroke volume ≥ 15% Positive predictive value- 95%, Negative predictive value- 93% dup- increase in hypervolemia and LVF ddown-not increased in RVF despite hypovolemia In the presence of large dup, the PPV, SPV and SVV will be less effective in predicting fluid responsiveness *cardiovascular monitoring Chapter 32, page 1327, Miller’s Anesthesia 7th edi
  • 39.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV PPmax-PPmin PPV= PPmax+PPmin/2
  • 40.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV Relation between Respiratory Changes in Arterial Pulse Pressure and Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure F. MICHARD, S. BOUSSAT, D. CHEMLA, NADIA ANGUEL, MICHAEL R. PINSKY, and JEAN-LOUIS TEBOUL Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 162. pp 134–138, 2000 Baseline VE 11o± 22 106 ± 21 MAP 69 ± 13 90 ± 13 Pra 9±3 12 ± 4 10 ± 3 14 ± 3 24 ± 6 29 ± 6 3.6 ± 0.9 4.0 ± 0.9 14 ± 10 7±5 9±6 6±4 HR (beats/min) (mmHg) Pcwp Ppa CI (mmHg) (mmHg) (l/min/m2) ∆PPV ∆SPV (%) (%) Threshold value of 13% was associated with increase in C.I. ≥ 15% in response to volume expansion Sensitivity- 94%, specificity96%
  • 41.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV
  • 42.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV PPV better predictor than other SV derived variables Inspiratory increase in pleural pressure increase in SPV Increase in extra-mural pressure Equal increase in Systolic pressure And Diastolic pressure no change in PPV Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
  • 43.
    PREDICTION OF PRELOADDEPENDENCE Respiratory cycle induced change in parameters related to cardiac index RESPIRATORY SYSTOLIC VARIATION TEST ( RSVT) RSVT slope 0.24 mmHg/ cmH2O predicted change in CI of 15% RSVT slope Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systollic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, et al Br J Anaesth 2005;95:746–55
  • 44.
    “since during criticalillness maintenance of the cardiac output may depend upon right ventricular function, the clinician need to be able to discern the presence of right ventricular dysfunction…” William Hurford, 1988 Presence of fluid responsiveness is not an indication by itself to administer fluids
  • 45.
    It is commonlysaid that a teacher fails if he has not been surpassed by his students -Edmond H. Fischer
  • 46.
    o PPV Pulse pressuredepends on stroke volume and arterial compliance Change in compliance may affect degree of PPV induced by increase in stroke volume Elderly- stiff arteries--- small increase in stroke volume--- large PPV Young healthy adult- large increase in stroke volume – relatively small PPV
  • 47.
    CVP o Effect ofpleural pressure o Effect of PEEP on pleural pressure less than half of PEEP is transmitted to the pleural space even less than that in pathological condition that require higher PEEP--- ARDS PEEP – <=10 cm H2O = 8 mmHg----- change in pleural pressure—2-3 mmHg but at PEEP>10 changes in pleural pressure at end expiration become significant o Effect of forced expiration on pleural pressure
  • 48.
    Respiratory change inpleural pressure o Respiratory change in Pcwp o Respiratory change in esophageal pressure
  • 49.
    Fluid challenge o o o o Rapidity offluid infusion is important- faster the fluid is given, lesser the amount to be given type of fluid- crystalloid or colloid does not matter Change in CVP and not the volume of infusion that is important Blood pressure is not a good guide as to whether C.O. increased with fluid infusion In ¾ patients in whom C.O. increased there was no increase in B.P. ( Bafaqeeh F, Magder S. CVP and volume responsiveness of cardiac output. Am J Respir Crit Car Med 2004, 169: A 343
  • 50.
    Role of echocardiography Assessmentof inadequate resuscitation: o o Volume status and responsiveness – fluid resuscitation Cardiac contractility -- ionotrope
  • 51.
    Effect of PositivePressure Mechanical Ventilation on Hemodynamics PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV contribution of transmission of pleural pressure effect on both systolic as well as diastolic pressure equally Determination of aortic pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation in man. Denault, Gasior, Pinsky, Gorscan, Mandarino. Chest 2000;116:176-186