This document discusses different theories of curriculum. It begins by explaining the concept of theory in general and debates around the "received view" of scientific theory. It then examines different approaches to curriculum theory, including their functions of description, prediction, explanation and guidance. The document also analyzes different frameworks for classifying curriculum theories, such as focusing on their structure, values, content or processes. Specific theorists are discussed, such as Macdonald who viewed curriculum as a social system, and Apple who analyzed the relationship between society and schools through the concept of hegemony.
To understand the concept of theory, it is essential to understand the nature of theory in general.
Historically, the Received View holds that a theory is a formalized, deductively connected bundle of laws that are applicable in specifiable ways to their observable manifestations. In the Received View, a small number of concepts are selected as bases for the theory; axioms are introduced that specify the fundamental relationships among those concepts; and definitions are provided, specifying the remaining concepts of the theory in terms of the basic ones.
THEORIES OF CURRICULUM AND THEIR MAJOR STRUCTUREseharalam
To understand the concept of theory, it is essential to understand the nature of theory in general.
Historically, the Received View holds that a theory is a formalized, deductively connected bundle of laws that are applicable in specifiable ways to their observable manifestations. In the Received View, a small number of concepts are selected as bases for the theory; axioms are introduced that specify the fundamental relationships among those concepts; and definitions are provided, specifying the remaining concepts of the theory in terms of the basic ones.
To understand the concept of theory, it is essential to understand the nature of theory in general.
Historically, the Received View holds that a theory is a formalized, deductively connected bundle of laws that are applicable in specifiable ways to their observable manifestations. In the Received View, a small number of concepts are selected as bases for the theory; axioms are introduced that specify the fundamental relationships among those concepts; and definitions are provided, specifying the remaining concepts of the theory in terms of the basic ones.
THEORIES OF CURRICULUM AND THEIR MAJOR STRUCTUREseharalam
To understand the concept of theory, it is essential to understand the nature of theory in general.
Historically, the Received View holds that a theory is a formalized, deductively connected bundle of laws that are applicable in specifiable ways to their observable manifestations. In the Received View, a small number of concepts are selected as bases for the theory; axioms are introduced that specify the fundamental relationships among those concepts; and definitions are provided, specifying the remaining concepts of the theory in terms of the basic ones.
The Tyler Model Is:
One Of The Best Known Models For Curriculum Development.
Known For The Special Attention It Gives To The Planning Phases.
Deductive For It Proceeds From The General (Examining The Needs Of Society,) To The Specific (Specifying Instructional Objectives).
Tyler Recommends That Curriculum Planners Identify General Objectives By Gathering Data From Three Sources:
1) The Learners
2) Contemporary Life Outside The School
3) Subject Matter. • After Identifying Numerous General Objectives, The Planners Refine Them By Filtering Them Through Two Screens:
1. The Philosophical Screen 2. The Psychological Screen
Determine The School’s Purposes (Objectives)
2. Identify Educational Experiences Related To Purpose
3. Organize The Experiences
4. Evaluate The Purposes
The philosophical basis of education emphasizes that philosophy is the end and education is the means to achieve that end. In other words, philosophy determines the goal of life and education tries to achieve the goal through its aims and curriculum.
The Tyler Model Is:
One Of The Best Known Models For Curriculum Development.
Known For The Special Attention It Gives To The Planning Phases.
Deductive For It Proceeds From The General (Examining The Needs Of Society,) To The Specific (Specifying Instructional Objectives).
Tyler Recommends That Curriculum Planners Identify General Objectives By Gathering Data From Three Sources:
1) The Learners
2) Contemporary Life Outside The School
3) Subject Matter. • After Identifying Numerous General Objectives, The Planners Refine Them By Filtering Them Through Two Screens:
1. The Philosophical Screen 2. The Psychological Screen
Determine The School’s Purposes (Objectives)
2. Identify Educational Experiences Related To Purpose
3. Organize The Experiences
4. Evaluate The Purposes
The philosophical basis of education emphasizes that philosophy is the end and education is the means to achieve that end. In other words, philosophy determines the goal of life and education tries to achieve the goal through its aims and curriculum.
Presented at the Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT C) "In dreams begins responsibility" ‐ choice, evidence, and change. Manchester, UK, 8 -10 September 2009.
This is an example of the 21st century curriculum design. A curriculum that is a higher order intellectual quality tasks, a curriculum that makes use of the social environment as the tool for learning and the learners develop the social regard and concern and develop action and solve problems in the community.
WTAMU Communication Research Methods
Source: The Selection of a Research Approach in "Research Design:Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches" by John W. Creswell (2014).
Common misconceptions of critical thinkingSHARON BAILIN, R.docxclarebernice
Common misconceptions of critical thinking
SHARON BAILIN, ROLAND CASE,
JERROLD R. COOMBS and LEROI B. DANIELS
In this paper, the ®rst of two, we analyse three widely-held conceptions of critical
thinking: as one or more skills, as mental processes, and as sets of procedures. Each
view is, we contend, wrong-headed, misleading or, at best, unhelpful. Some who write
about critical thinking seem to muddle all three views in an unenlightening meÂlange.
Apart from the errors or inadequacies of the conceptions themselves, they promote or
abet misconceived practices for teaching critical thinking. Together, they have led to
the view that critical thinking is best taught by practising it. We oÄer alternative
proposals for the teaching of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a subject of considerable current interest, both in terms
of theory and pedagogy. A great deal is written about critical thinking,
conferences on the subject abound, and educational initiatives aimed at
fostering critical thinking proliferate.1 It is our view that much of the
theoretical work and many of the pedagogical endeavours in this area are
misdirected because they are based on faulty conceptions of critical think-
ing. Critical thinking is frequently conceptualized in terms of skills, pro-
cesses, procedures and practice. Much of the educational literature either
refers to cognitive or thinking skills or equates critical thinking with certain
mental processes or procedural moves that can be improved through
practice. In this paper we attempt to explain the misconceptions inherent
in such ways of conceptualizing critical thinking. It is important to note
that much of the literature contains a pervasive miasma of overlapping uses
of such terms as skill, process, procedure, behaviour, mental operations,
j. curriculum studies
, 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, 269±283
S haron Bailin, a professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6, is interested in philosophical inquiries into critical
thinking, creativity and aesthetic education. Her publications include Reason and V alues:
New Essays in Philosophy of Education (Calgary, AB: Detselig, 1993), co-edited with John P.
Portelli.
Roland Case, an associate professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University,
conducts research in social studies and legal and global education. His most recent book is
The Canadian Anthology of Social S tudies: Issues and S trategies (Burnaby, BC: Faculty of
Education, Simon Fraser University), co-edited with Penney Clark.
Jerrold R. Coombs, a professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia,
has published extensively on ethical issues in education and the development of competence
in practical reasoning. His publications include Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford: Black-
well, 1993), co-edited with Earl R. Winkler.
L eRoi B. Daniels, a professor emeritus in the Faculty of Education, University of British
Columbia, is ...
Common misconceptions of critical thinkingSHARON BAILIN, RLynellBull52
Common misconceptions of critical thinking
SHARON BAILIN, ROLAND CASE,
JERROLD R. COOMBS and LEROI B. DANIELS
In this paper, the ® rst of two, we analyse three widely-held conceptions of critical
thinking: as one or more skills, as mental processes, and as sets of procedures. Each
view is, we contend, wrong-headed, misleading or, at best, unhelpful. Some who write
about critical thinking seem to muddle all three views in an unenlightening me lange.
Apart from the errors or inadequacies of the conceptions themselves, they promote or
abet misconceived practices for teaching critical thinking. Together, they have led to
the view that critical thinking is best taught by practising it. We o� er alternative
proposals for the teaching of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a subject of considerable current interest, both in terms
of theory and pedagogy. A great deal is written about critical thinking,
conferences on the subject abound, and educational initiatives aimed at
fostering critical thinking proliferate.1 It is our view that much of the
theoretical work and many of the pedagogical endeavours in this area are
misdirected because they are based on faulty conceptions of critical think-
ing. Critical thinking is frequently conceptualized in terms of skills, pro-
cesses, procedures and practice. Much of the educational literature either
refers to cognitive or thinking skills or equates critical thinking with certain
mental processes or procedural moves that can be improved through
practice. In this paper we attempt to explain the misconceptions inherent
in such ways of conceptualizing critical thinking. It is important to note
that much of the literature contains a pervasive miasma of overlapping uses
of such terms as skill, process, procedure, behaviour, mental operations,
j. curriculum studies, 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, 269± 283
S haron Bailin, a professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6, is interested in philosophical inquiries into critical
thinking, creativity and aesthetic education. Her publications include Reason and V alues:
New Essays in Philosophy of Education (Calgary, AB: Detselig, 1993), co-edited with John P.
Portelli.
Roland Case, an associate professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University,
conducts research in social studies and legal and global education. His most recent book is
The Canadian Anthology of Social S tudies: Issues and S trategies (Burnaby, BC: Faculty of
Education, Simon Fraser University), co-edited with Penney Clark.
Jerrold R. Coombs, a professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia,
has published extensively on ethical issues in education and the development of competence
in practical reasoning. His publications include Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford: Black-
well, 1993), co-edited with Earl R. Winkler.
L eRoi B. Daniels, a professor emeritus in the Faculty of Education, University of British
Columbia, ...
Philosophies of schooling - Lecture Notes William Allan Kritsonis, PhDWilliam Kritsonis
Philosophies of schooling - Lecture Notes William Allan Kritsonis, PhD - - Dr. Kritsonis has traveled and lectured extensively throughout the United States and world-wide. Some international travels include Australia, New Zealand, Tasmania, Turkey, Italy, Greece, Monte Carlo, England, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Estonia, Poland, Germany, Mexico, the Caribbean Islands, Mexico, Switzerland, Grand Cayman, Haiti, St. Maarten, St. John, St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. Lucia, Puerto Rico, Nassau, Freeport, Jamaica, Barbados, Martinique, Canada, Curacao, Costa Rico, Aruba, Venezuela, Panama, Bora Bora, Tahiti, Latvia, Spain, Honduras, and many more. He has been
Theoretical and Conceptual framework in ResearchIkbal Ahmed
A presentation on Theoretical framework and conceptual framework of a research.From this presentation you can know -
1) About theory and 4 types of theory
2) How to choose a suitable theoretical framework for your research
3) How to make a good conceptual framework for your research
4) Find out Independent variable and dependent variable of your problem statement
5) Relation between TF & CF relative to Quantitative and Qualitative methodology
IntroductionLearning ObjectivesAfter reading this chapter,.docxnormanibarber20063
Introduction
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
Describe how understanding how we learn can be applied in a real-world setting with self and others.
Explain the basic premises of behaviorism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of cognitivism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of constructivism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of humanism as applied to learning theory.
Identify evolving frameworks of learning theory that expand upon our understanding of how we learn.
· My Bookshelf
· TOC/Annotation menu
· Downloads
· Print
· Search
· Profile
· Help
i.1 Understanding How We Learn
Previous section
Next section
i.1 Understanding How We Learn
Have you ever
· tried to help someone with a task, but the more you encouraged him or her, the worse the process became?
· studied all night for an exam but received an F on the test?
· heard a song from 20 years ago on the radio but still knew the lyrics? (Maybe you even wondered how you could possibly still know the old melody but not remember the name of the classmate you met less than 24 hours ago.)
· ignored someone because his or her beliefs differed from your beliefs?
· felt frustrated because your child was struggling in school?
· needed to train a group of employees but had no idea how to begin the process?
· assumed that the people around you should learn something as easily as you do?
· looked back on a decision and recognized that you were not thinking logically when that decision was made?
· had someone dear to you pass away and, afterwards, found it difficult to focus on tasks for any length of time?
If you have ever experienced any of these situations, then the psychology of learning could potentially be one of the most important areas that you will ever study. Understanding how humans learn, based on the psychological principles of learning and educational psychologies, can have profound results on productivity, success, and the search for self-actualization. Such knowledge is applicable in your personal and professional lives. It can empower you to know yourself better. Your knowledge about learning can help you teach and support others better, too. Learning, in essence, is something that you do and that affects you every day (Curran, Harrison, & Mackinnon, 2013).
Bowie15/iStock/Thinkstock
Understanding how you learn enables you to teach and support others.
Before you can successfully apply such information in your daily life, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the theories, models, and conceptual frameworks associated with learning. A theory is a set of principles used to explain, predict, and understand why a phenomenon occurs. Theories are supported by research but may not be valid in all situations; theories are propositions, not facts. For example, cognitive load theory (CLT), which is discussed further in Chapter 3, proposes th.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
2. CERRICULUM THEORY :
-to understand the concept of curriculum theory , it is
essential obviously to understand the nature of theory in
general .here there is much disagreement among
philosophers of science .
-on the one hand , there are those who espouse what has
come to be known as the received view of scientific theory .
As suppe(1974) points out , the received view holds that a
theory is a formalized , deductively connected bundle of laws
which are applicable in specifiable ways to their observable
manifestations .
3. Curriculum theory
In the received view a small number of concepts are
selected as bases for the theory ; axioms are
introduced which specify the fundamental
relationships between those concepts ; and definitions
are provided , specifying the remaining concepts of the
theory in terms of the basic ones .
4. Curriculum theory There have been several criticisms of the received view
, even in its revised formulation.
First its narrowness in requiring axiomatization ,
noting that several scientific theories are not and
cannot be axiomated profitably .
Hanson(1958) attacked the received view for its
posture of value – neutrality ; every aspect of theory
development is value-laden . Scientists observations
are profoundly influenced by their world views and
their values .
5. Those who reject the positivist assumptions of the RV tend
to be classified as
realists Instrumentalists
See science as a rational and
empirical endeavor
concerned primarily with
explanatory and predictive
outcomes .
Theory is a description of
those structures which
generate observable
phenomena .
Concentrate on the function
the theory performs .
Theory is a tool of inquiry ,
rather than a picture or map
of the world .
Theory assessed on the basis
of the quality of predictions it
demonstrates .
6. The definition of curriculum theory :
A curriculum theory is a set of related educational
concepts that affords a systematic and illuminating
perspective of curricular phenomena .
7. The function of theory :
Many writers have ascribed four functions to theory :
Function
of theory
Description
prediction
Explanation
Guidance
8. Function of theory :
Description provides a narrative classification of
knowledge in a particular theoretical field . It
furnished a structure through which individuals
interpretations of complex activities can be verified . It
organizes and summarizes knowledge .
Prediction –a theory can predict the occurrence of as
yet unobserved events on the basis of explanatory
principles embedded in it . Perhaps this is the ultimate
function of theory .
9. Function of theory :
Explanation addresses “why .” it not only points out
the relationships between phenomena , but suggests
either explicitly or implicitly the reasons for the
relationships .
Guidance . Theory also acts as a guide . It helps
researchers choose data for analysis and make
economical summaries of the data . the theory
generated promotes further investigation .
11. Classifyingcurriculumtheory: faix,s (1964)
He attempt to classify curriculum theories in terms of
their maturity and complexity . This classification of
the stages of theory development seems useful .
Basic
theory
Middle-
range
theory
General
theory
12. Classifyingcurriculumtheory: faix,s (1964)
Basic theory , is an early speculative stage ,in which a
theory has not been correlated with empirical data . It
sets up untested hypotheses , involves few variables ,
and employs concepts that are not systematically
refined and classified .
Middle –range theory , includes hypotheses which
have been empirically tested . An effort has been made
to eliminate unlikely variables and relations by the use
of models and testing .
13. Classifyingcurriculumtheory: faix,s (1964)
General theory , is a general theoretical system or an
inclusive conceptual scheme for explaining an entire
universe of inquiry . General theory attempts to
integrate the substantive knowledge produced from
middle-range theories .
14. Classifying curriculum theory : mc Neil (1985)
He sets up what seems to be an unilluminating
dichotomy
• Such as William pinar and
other reconceptualists who
draw from fields of religion
, philosophy ,and literary
criticism .
Soft
curricularists
• Follow a rational approach
and rely on empirical data .Hard
curricularists
,
15. Classifyingcurriculumtheory :
It seems most useful to divide curriculum theories into
the following four categories based upon their
domains of inquiry :
Structure –
oriented
theory
Value-
oriented
theory
Content-
Process –
oriented
theory
16. Structure - orientedtheories:
Are concerned primarily with analyzing the
components of the curriculum and their
interrelationships . It tend to be descriptive and
explanatory in intent.
Structure oriented theories examine questions such as
the following.
1- what are the essential concepts of the curriculum
field and how may they most usefully be defined ?
17. Structure - orientedtheories:
2-what are the levels of curriculum decision making
and what forces seem to operate at each of those levels
? For example , how do classroom teachers make
decisions about the curriculum .
3-how may the curriculum field be most validly
analyzed into its component parts ? For example , how
does a program of study differ from a field of study ?
18. Structure- orientedtheories:
4- what principles seem to govern issues of content
selection , organization , and sequencing ? For
example , how can curricular elements be articulated ?
19. Value – orientedtheories:
Value – oriented theories seem to be primarily
engaged in what might be termed “ educational
consciousness-raising ,attempting to sensitize
educators to the values issues that lie at the hearts of
both the hidden and the stated curricula. Their intent
is primarily a critical one ; thus they sometimes have
been identified as “critical theorists .” since many have
argued the need for reconceptualizing the field of
curriculum , they often are labeled as reconceptualists
.
20. Value – orientedtheories:
In their inquiries , value-oriented theorists tend to
examine issues such as the following :
1-in what ways do the schools replicate the power
differentials in the larger society ?
2-what is the nature of a truly liberated individual ,and
how does schooling inhibit such liberation?
3-how do schools consciously or unwittingly mold
children and youth to fit into societal roles
predetermined by race and class ?
21. Value – orientedtheories:
4- as curriculum leaders determine what constitutes
legitimate knowledge , how do such decisions reflect
their class biases and serve to inhibit the full
development of children and youth ?
5-in what ways does the schools treatment of
controversial issues tend to minimize and conceal the
conflicts endemic the society ?
In examining these issues , most value-oriented
theorists draw eclectically from several inquiry
methodologies , such as psychoanalysis , philosophical
inquiry , historical analysis , and political theory .
22. The major value-oriented theorists
:
Macdonald ,s theory
He defines curriculum as the social system that
actually produces a plan for instruction , which he in
turn defines as another social system within which
formal teaching and learning take place .
Teaching is different from instruction and is defined as
a personality system-the teacher-acting in a particular
manner to facilitate learning
Learning is defined as a personality system too ; the
student becomes involved in specializes task-related
behaviors .
23. The major value-oriented theorists :
Michael apple
He is another critical theorist who seems to be
concerned primarily with the relationships between
the society and its school .central to apple critique of
the society and its schools is his use of the concept of
hegemony .