Introduction to Biostatistics. This lecture was given as a part of the Introduction to Epidemiology & Community Medicine Course given for third-year medical students.
The document discusses the concepts and process of formulating and testing hypotheses in business research methodology. It defines key terms related to hypotheses such as the null hypothesis, alternate hypothesis, type I and type II errors, and level of significance. The steps in hypothesis testing are outlined, including formulating the hypotheses, defining a test statistic, determining the distribution of the test statistic, defining the critical region, and making a decision to accept or reject the null hypothesis. Both parametric and non-parametric tests are discussed along with conditions for using z-tests and t-tests.
The document discusses hypothesis testing and provides examples to illustrate the process. It explains how to state the research question and hypotheses, set the decision rule, calculate test statistics, decide if results are significant, and interpret the findings. An example tests if narcissistic individuals look in the mirror more often than others and finds they do based on a test statistic exceeding the critical value. A second example finds no significant difference in recovery time for patients with or without social support after surgery.
The document provides an overview of hypothesis testing, including defining the null and alternative hypotheses, types of errors, significance levels, critical values, test statistics, and conducting hypothesis tests using both the traditional and p-value methods. Examples are provided for z-tests, t-tests, and tests of proportions to demonstrate applications of hypothesis testing methodology.
This document provides an overview of key concepts related to formulating and testing hypotheses. It defines a hypothesis as a proposition or claim about a population that can be empirically tested. Hypothesis testing involves examining two opposing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (Ha). It describes the basic steps of hypothesis testing as formulating the hypotheses, defining a test statistic, determining the distribution of the test statistic, defining the critical region, and making a decision to accept or reject the null hypothesis. Key concepts like type I and type II errors, significance levels, critical values, and one-tailed vs two-tailed tests are also explained. Parametric tests like the z-test, t-test, and
The document discusses hypothesis testing and the scientific research process. It begins by defining a hypothesis as a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables that can be tested. It then outlines the typical steps in the scientific research process, which includes forming a question, background research, creating a hypothesis, experiment design, data collection, analysis, conclusions, and communicating results. Finally, it provides details on characteristics of a strong hypothesis, the process of hypothesis testing through statistical analysis, and setting up an experiment for hypothesis testing, including defining hypotheses, significance levels, sample size determination, and calculating standard deviation.
Statistical Inference /Hypothesis Testing Dr Nisha Arora
This document discusses hypothesis testing and related statistical concepts. It begins with an outline of the key topics to be covered, including the concept of hypothesis testing, motivation for its use, null and alternative hypotheses, types of errors, and examples. It then provides more detailed explanations and examples of these topics:
- Hypothesis testing involves using sample data to determine if there is evidence to reject or fail to reject claims about a population.
- Examples show how hypothesis testing can help decision makers determine if new suppliers or products meet claimed standards.
- The null hypothesis states there is no difference or effect, while the alternative hypothesis specifies an expected difference.
- Type I errors incorrectly reject the null hypothesis, while type
Repurposing predictive tools for causal researchGalit Shmueli
This document discusses repurposing predictive tools like decision trees for causal research. It addresses two key issues: self-selection and identifying confounders. The author proposes using tree-based approaches to analyze self-selection in impact studies involving big data. Three applications are described that examine the impact of labor training, an e-government service in India, and outsourcing contract features. The benefits of the tree-based approach include detecting unbalanced variables and heterogeneous treatment effects without data loss. Challenges include assuming selection on observables and instability with continuous variables. The author also discusses using trees to detect Simpson's paradox when evaluating causal relationships in big data.
This document provides an overview of hypothesis testing, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and how to properly quote references and include a bibliography. It discusses the key steps in hypothesis testing, including stating the null and alternative hypotheses, choosing a significance level, determining the sampling distribution, calculating probabilities, and deciding whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. It also outlines one-way and two-way ANOVA, explaining how to calculate variances between and within samples/groups and use an F-test statistic. Finally, it defines what a bibliography is, lists standard citation styles, and distinguishes between references cited in a work and a full bibliography.
The document discusses the concepts and process of formulating and testing hypotheses in business research methodology. It defines key terms related to hypotheses such as the null hypothesis, alternate hypothesis, type I and type II errors, and level of significance. The steps in hypothesis testing are outlined, including formulating the hypotheses, defining a test statistic, determining the distribution of the test statistic, defining the critical region, and making a decision to accept or reject the null hypothesis. Both parametric and non-parametric tests are discussed along with conditions for using z-tests and t-tests.
The document discusses hypothesis testing and provides examples to illustrate the process. It explains how to state the research question and hypotheses, set the decision rule, calculate test statistics, decide if results are significant, and interpret the findings. An example tests if narcissistic individuals look in the mirror more often than others and finds they do based on a test statistic exceeding the critical value. A second example finds no significant difference in recovery time for patients with or without social support after surgery.
The document provides an overview of hypothesis testing, including defining the null and alternative hypotheses, types of errors, significance levels, critical values, test statistics, and conducting hypothesis tests using both the traditional and p-value methods. Examples are provided for z-tests, t-tests, and tests of proportions to demonstrate applications of hypothesis testing methodology.
This document provides an overview of key concepts related to formulating and testing hypotheses. It defines a hypothesis as a proposition or claim about a population that can be empirically tested. Hypothesis testing involves examining two opposing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (Ha). It describes the basic steps of hypothesis testing as formulating the hypotheses, defining a test statistic, determining the distribution of the test statistic, defining the critical region, and making a decision to accept or reject the null hypothesis. Key concepts like type I and type II errors, significance levels, critical values, and one-tailed vs two-tailed tests are also explained. Parametric tests like the z-test, t-test, and
The document discusses hypothesis testing and the scientific research process. It begins by defining a hypothesis as a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables that can be tested. It then outlines the typical steps in the scientific research process, which includes forming a question, background research, creating a hypothesis, experiment design, data collection, analysis, conclusions, and communicating results. Finally, it provides details on characteristics of a strong hypothesis, the process of hypothesis testing through statistical analysis, and setting up an experiment for hypothesis testing, including defining hypotheses, significance levels, sample size determination, and calculating standard deviation.
Statistical Inference /Hypothesis Testing Dr Nisha Arora
This document discusses hypothesis testing and related statistical concepts. It begins with an outline of the key topics to be covered, including the concept of hypothesis testing, motivation for its use, null and alternative hypotheses, types of errors, and examples. It then provides more detailed explanations and examples of these topics:
- Hypothesis testing involves using sample data to determine if there is evidence to reject or fail to reject claims about a population.
- Examples show how hypothesis testing can help decision makers determine if new suppliers or products meet claimed standards.
- The null hypothesis states there is no difference or effect, while the alternative hypothesis specifies an expected difference.
- Type I errors incorrectly reject the null hypothesis, while type
Repurposing predictive tools for causal researchGalit Shmueli
This document discusses repurposing predictive tools like decision trees for causal research. It addresses two key issues: self-selection and identifying confounders. The author proposes using tree-based approaches to analyze self-selection in impact studies involving big data. Three applications are described that examine the impact of labor training, an e-government service in India, and outsourcing contract features. The benefits of the tree-based approach include detecting unbalanced variables and heterogeneous treatment effects without data loss. Challenges include assuming selection on observables and instability with continuous variables. The author also discusses using trees to detect Simpson's paradox when evaluating causal relationships in big data.
This document provides an overview of hypothesis testing, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and how to properly quote references and include a bibliography. It discusses the key steps in hypothesis testing, including stating the null and alternative hypotheses, choosing a significance level, determining the sampling distribution, calculating probabilities, and deciding whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. It also outlines one-way and two-way ANOVA, explaining how to calculate variances between and within samples/groups and use an F-test statistic. Finally, it defines what a bibliography is, lists standard citation styles, and distinguishes between references cited in a work and a full bibliography.
Researchers use hypothesis testing to evaluate claims about populations by taking samples and analyzing the results. The four steps of hypothesis testing are: 1) stating the null and alternative hypotheses, 2) setting the significance level typically at 5%, 3) computing a test statistic to quantify how unlikely the sample results would be if the null was true, and 4) making a decision to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on comparing the test statistic to the significance level. The goal is to systematically evaluate whether a hypothesized population parameter, such as a mean, is likely to be true based on the sample results.
This document discusses quantitative research methods and statistical inference. It covers topics like probability distributions, sampling distributions, estimation, hypothesis testing, and different statistical tests. Key points include:
- Probability distributions describe random variables and their associated probabilities. The normal distribution is important and described by its mean and standard deviation.
- Sampling distributions allow making inferences about populations based on samples. The sampling distribution of the mean approximates a normal distribution as the sample size increases.
- Statistical inference involves estimation and hypothesis testing. Estimation provides a value for an unknown population parameter based on a sample statistic. Hypothesis testing compares a null hypothesis to an alternative hypothesis based on a test statistic and can result in type 1 or type 2 errors.
Nowadays Sentiment Analysis play an important Role in each field such as Stock market, product reviews, news article, political debates which help us to determining current trend in the market regarding specific product, event, issues. Here we are apply sentiment analysis on microblogging platforms such as twitter, Facebook which is used by different people to express their opinion with respect to different kind of foods in the field of home’schef. This paper explain different methods of text preprocessing and applies them with a naive Bayes classifier in a big data, distributed computing platform with the goal of creating a scalable sentiment analysis solution that can classify text into positive or negative categories. We apply negation handling, word n-grams, stemming, and feature selection to evaluate how different combinations of these pre-processing methods affect performance and efficiency.
This document discusses key concepts in applied statistics including hypothesis testing, p-values, types of errors, sensitivity and specificity. It provides examples and explanations of these topics using scenarios about testing if feeding chickens chocolate changes the gender ratio of offspring. Hypothesis testing involves defining the null and alternative hypotheses and using a statistical test to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on the p-value. Type I and type II errors in hypothesis testing are explained. Sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic tests are introduced using an example about detecting if a car is being stolen.
This document discusses one-tailed and two-tailed hypothesis tests. A one-tailed test has rejection regions in only one tail, while a two-tailed test splits rejection regions equally between both tails. The key difference is how the null and alternative hypotheses are expressed. A one-tailed alternative hypothesis uses "<" or ">" to specify the direction of the expected difference, while a two-tailed alternative uses "≠" to allow for differences in either direction. The appropriate type of test depends on what the researcher aims to prove.
This document discusses explanations and hypotheses in political research. It defines explanations as proposing causes for observed political phenomena and hypotheses as testable statements about relationships between causes and effects. The goal of political research is to propose and test explanations through this three-stage process: 1) proposing an explanation, 2) stating a hypothesis, and 3) testing the hypothesis. It discusses key concepts like independent and dependent variables, research designs, and the differences between true experiments, natural experiments, and controlled comparisons. The overall purpose is to explain how political scientists develop and evaluate causal explanations and hypotheses through the research process.
Hypothesis testing involves stating a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1). H0 assumes there is no effect or relationship in the population. H1 states there is an effect. A study is conducted and statistics are used to determine if the data supports rejecting H0 in favor of H1. The p-value indicates the probability of obtaining results as extreme as the observed data or more extreme if H0 is true. If p ≤ the predetermined significance level (α = 0.05), H0 is rejected in favor of H1. Otherwise, H0 is retained but not proven true. Type I and II errors can occur when the true hypothesis is incorrectly rejected or retained.
Hypothesis testing involves 4 steps: 1) stating the null and alternative hypotheses, 2) setting the significance level criteria, 3) computing a test statistic to evaluate the hypotheses, and 4) making a decision to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on the significance level and test statistic. The goal is to correctly identify true null hypotheses while minimizing errors like falsely rejecting a true null hypothesis (Type I error) or retaining a false null hypothesis (Type II error).
This document provides an introduction to applied statistics and various statistical concepts. It discusses the normal (Gaussian) distribution, standard deviation, standard error of the mean, and confidence intervals. Examples and explanations are provided for each concept. Hands-on examples for calculating these statistics in Excel, SPSS, and Prism are also presented. The document aims to explain key statistical terms and how they are applied in data analysis.
The document provides an introduction to hypothesis testing, including its real-life applications, key definitions, and structure. It defines hypothesis testing as the process of testing the validity of a statistical hypothesis based on a random sample from a population. The document outlines the common steps in hypothesis testing: 1) stating the null and alternative hypotheses, 2) choosing a significance level, 3) determining the test statistic and decision criteria, 4) rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis, and 5) drawing a conclusion. It also defines important terminology like population mean, null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, significance level, critical region, and p-value. Real-life examples from pharmaceutical testing and legal cases are provided to illustrate the motivation for hypothesis
This document discusses hypothesis testing using a single sample. It explains that a hypothesis test involves a null hypothesis (H0) which is initially assumed to be true, and an alternative hypothesis (Ha) which is the competing claim. The test aims to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. A test statistic is calculated from sample data and compared to a significance level (α) to determine whether to reject H0. Examples are provided to illustrate hypotheses about population means, proportions, and their tests.
1. The document discusses the chi-square test, which is used to determine if there is a relationship between two categorical variables.
2. A contingency table is constructed with observed frequencies to calculate expected frequencies under the null hypothesis of no relationship.
3. The chi-square test statistic is calculated by summing the squared differences between observed and expected frequencies divided by the expected frequencies.
4. The calculated chi-square value is then compared to a critical value from the chi-square distribution to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
The document discusses various applications of dimension reduction techniques to extract low-dimensional representations from high-dimensional data for purposes of prediction, descriptive analysis, and input into subsequent causal analysis. It provides examples of such applications using Google search data, genetic data, medical claims data, credit scores, online purchases, and congressional roll call votes. It also discusses issues around text as data, including bag-of-words representations and the use of automated and manual steps in text analysis.
BMI (kg/m2)
22.1
23.4
24.8
26.2
27.6
28.9
30.3
31.6
32.9
34.2
35.5
36.8
38.1
39.4
The sample mean is 29.1 kg/m2 and the sample standard
deviation is 4.2 kg/m2. Test the hypothesis that the
population mean BMI is 30 kg/m2 at 5% level of
significance.
This document provides an overview of hypothesis testing concepts that were covered in Lecture 2, including:
- Introduction to hypothesis testing and the concepts of testing hypotheses about population parameters.
- Examples of hypothesis testing in different contexts like determining if a new drug is effective or if a defendant is guilty or innocent.
- The key concepts of hypothesis testing including the null and alternative hypotheses, types of errors, rejection regions, test statistics, and p-values.
- Worked examples demonstrating how to conduct hypothesis tests about a population mean when the population standard deviation is known, including using the rejection region and p-value methods.
This document provides an overview of hypothesis testing in inferential statistics. It defines a hypothesis as a statement or assumption about relationships between variables or tentative explanations for events. There are two main types of hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0), which is the default position that is tested, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha or H1). Steps in hypothesis testing include establishing the null and alternative hypotheses, selecting a suitable test of significance or test statistic based on sample characteristics, formulating a decision rule to either accept or reject the null hypothesis based on where the test statistic value falls, and understanding the potential for errors. Key criteria for constructing hypotheses and selecting appropriate statistical tests are also outlined.
This document defines key concepts in statistical hypothesis testing. It explains that a statistical hypothesis is a conjecture about a population parameter. The null hypothesis (H0) states that there is no difference between a parameter and a particular value, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) states there is a difference. Tests can be one-tailed if H1 is > or <, or two-tailed if H1 is ≠. Type I and II errors occur if the wrong decision is made regarding H0. The level of significance and critical value help determine whether to reject or fail to reject H0.
To Explain, To Predict, or To Describe?Galit Shmueli
1) The document discusses the differences between explanatory, predictive, and descriptive modeling and evaluation. Explanatory modeling tests causal hypotheses, predictive modeling predicts new observations, and descriptive modeling approximates distributions or relationships.
2) It notes that these goals are different and the same model is not best for all three. Social sciences often focus on explanation while machine learning focuses on prediction.
3) The key aspects that differ for these three types of modeling are the theory, causation versus association, retrospective versus prospective analysis, and focusing on the average unit versus individual units. The best model for one goal is not necessarily best for the others.
This document summarizes a presentation on hypothesis testing. It defines key concepts like the null and alternative hypotheses, type I and type II errors, and one-tailed and two-tailed tests. It then outlines the procedure for hypothesis testing, including setting hypotheses, selecting a significance level, calculating test statistics, and determining whether to reject the null hypothesis. Specific hypothesis tests are described, like paired t-tests for comparing two related samples and tests of proportions. Limitations of hypothesis testing are noted, such as that results are probabilistic and small samples impact reliability.
A chi-squared test (χ2) is basically a data analysis on the basis of observations of a random set of variables. Usually, it is a comparison of two statistical data sets. This test was introduced by Karl Pearson in 1900 for categorical data analysis and distribution. So, it was mentioned as Pearson’s chi-squared test.
The document discusses key concepts related to formulating and testing hypotheses, including:
- Null and alternative hypotheses, which are mutually exclusive statements tested through sample analysis.
- Type I and Type II errors that can occur when making decisions to accept or reject the null hypothesis.
- The level of significance, critical region, and test statistics used to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis.
- The differences between one-tailed and two-tailed tests, parametric vs. non-parametric tests, and one-sample vs. two-sample tests.
Researchers use hypothesis testing to evaluate claims about populations by taking samples and analyzing the results. The four steps of hypothesis testing are: 1) stating the null and alternative hypotheses, 2) setting the significance level typically at 5%, 3) computing a test statistic to quantify how unlikely the sample results would be if the null was true, and 4) making a decision to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on comparing the test statistic to the significance level. The goal is to systematically evaluate whether a hypothesized population parameter, such as a mean, is likely to be true based on the sample results.
This document discusses quantitative research methods and statistical inference. It covers topics like probability distributions, sampling distributions, estimation, hypothesis testing, and different statistical tests. Key points include:
- Probability distributions describe random variables and their associated probabilities. The normal distribution is important and described by its mean and standard deviation.
- Sampling distributions allow making inferences about populations based on samples. The sampling distribution of the mean approximates a normal distribution as the sample size increases.
- Statistical inference involves estimation and hypothesis testing. Estimation provides a value for an unknown population parameter based on a sample statistic. Hypothesis testing compares a null hypothesis to an alternative hypothesis based on a test statistic and can result in type 1 or type 2 errors.
Nowadays Sentiment Analysis play an important Role in each field such as Stock market, product reviews, news article, political debates which help us to determining current trend in the market regarding specific product, event, issues. Here we are apply sentiment analysis on microblogging platforms such as twitter, Facebook which is used by different people to express their opinion with respect to different kind of foods in the field of home’schef. This paper explain different methods of text preprocessing and applies them with a naive Bayes classifier in a big data, distributed computing platform with the goal of creating a scalable sentiment analysis solution that can classify text into positive or negative categories. We apply negation handling, word n-grams, stemming, and feature selection to evaluate how different combinations of these pre-processing methods affect performance and efficiency.
This document discusses key concepts in applied statistics including hypothesis testing, p-values, types of errors, sensitivity and specificity. It provides examples and explanations of these topics using scenarios about testing if feeding chickens chocolate changes the gender ratio of offspring. Hypothesis testing involves defining the null and alternative hypotheses and using a statistical test to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on the p-value. Type I and type II errors in hypothesis testing are explained. Sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic tests are introduced using an example about detecting if a car is being stolen.
This document discusses one-tailed and two-tailed hypothesis tests. A one-tailed test has rejection regions in only one tail, while a two-tailed test splits rejection regions equally between both tails. The key difference is how the null and alternative hypotheses are expressed. A one-tailed alternative hypothesis uses "<" or ">" to specify the direction of the expected difference, while a two-tailed alternative uses "≠" to allow for differences in either direction. The appropriate type of test depends on what the researcher aims to prove.
This document discusses explanations and hypotheses in political research. It defines explanations as proposing causes for observed political phenomena and hypotheses as testable statements about relationships between causes and effects. The goal of political research is to propose and test explanations through this three-stage process: 1) proposing an explanation, 2) stating a hypothesis, and 3) testing the hypothesis. It discusses key concepts like independent and dependent variables, research designs, and the differences between true experiments, natural experiments, and controlled comparisons. The overall purpose is to explain how political scientists develop and evaluate causal explanations and hypotheses through the research process.
Hypothesis testing involves stating a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1). H0 assumes there is no effect or relationship in the population. H1 states there is an effect. A study is conducted and statistics are used to determine if the data supports rejecting H0 in favor of H1. The p-value indicates the probability of obtaining results as extreme as the observed data or more extreme if H0 is true. If p ≤ the predetermined significance level (α = 0.05), H0 is rejected in favor of H1. Otherwise, H0 is retained but not proven true. Type I and II errors can occur when the true hypothesis is incorrectly rejected or retained.
Hypothesis testing involves 4 steps: 1) stating the null and alternative hypotheses, 2) setting the significance level criteria, 3) computing a test statistic to evaluate the hypotheses, and 4) making a decision to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on the significance level and test statistic. The goal is to correctly identify true null hypotheses while minimizing errors like falsely rejecting a true null hypothesis (Type I error) or retaining a false null hypothesis (Type II error).
This document provides an introduction to applied statistics and various statistical concepts. It discusses the normal (Gaussian) distribution, standard deviation, standard error of the mean, and confidence intervals. Examples and explanations are provided for each concept. Hands-on examples for calculating these statistics in Excel, SPSS, and Prism are also presented. The document aims to explain key statistical terms and how they are applied in data analysis.
The document provides an introduction to hypothesis testing, including its real-life applications, key definitions, and structure. It defines hypothesis testing as the process of testing the validity of a statistical hypothesis based on a random sample from a population. The document outlines the common steps in hypothesis testing: 1) stating the null and alternative hypotheses, 2) choosing a significance level, 3) determining the test statistic and decision criteria, 4) rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis, and 5) drawing a conclusion. It also defines important terminology like population mean, null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, significance level, critical region, and p-value. Real-life examples from pharmaceutical testing and legal cases are provided to illustrate the motivation for hypothesis
This document discusses hypothesis testing using a single sample. It explains that a hypothesis test involves a null hypothesis (H0) which is initially assumed to be true, and an alternative hypothesis (Ha) which is the competing claim. The test aims to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. A test statistic is calculated from sample data and compared to a significance level (α) to determine whether to reject H0. Examples are provided to illustrate hypotheses about population means, proportions, and their tests.
1. The document discusses the chi-square test, which is used to determine if there is a relationship between two categorical variables.
2. A contingency table is constructed with observed frequencies to calculate expected frequencies under the null hypothesis of no relationship.
3. The chi-square test statistic is calculated by summing the squared differences between observed and expected frequencies divided by the expected frequencies.
4. The calculated chi-square value is then compared to a critical value from the chi-square distribution to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
The document discusses various applications of dimension reduction techniques to extract low-dimensional representations from high-dimensional data for purposes of prediction, descriptive analysis, and input into subsequent causal analysis. It provides examples of such applications using Google search data, genetic data, medical claims data, credit scores, online purchases, and congressional roll call votes. It also discusses issues around text as data, including bag-of-words representations and the use of automated and manual steps in text analysis.
BMI (kg/m2)
22.1
23.4
24.8
26.2
27.6
28.9
30.3
31.6
32.9
34.2
35.5
36.8
38.1
39.4
The sample mean is 29.1 kg/m2 and the sample standard
deviation is 4.2 kg/m2. Test the hypothesis that the
population mean BMI is 30 kg/m2 at 5% level of
significance.
This document provides an overview of hypothesis testing concepts that were covered in Lecture 2, including:
- Introduction to hypothesis testing and the concepts of testing hypotheses about population parameters.
- Examples of hypothesis testing in different contexts like determining if a new drug is effective or if a defendant is guilty or innocent.
- The key concepts of hypothesis testing including the null and alternative hypotheses, types of errors, rejection regions, test statistics, and p-values.
- Worked examples demonstrating how to conduct hypothesis tests about a population mean when the population standard deviation is known, including using the rejection region and p-value methods.
This document provides an overview of hypothesis testing in inferential statistics. It defines a hypothesis as a statement or assumption about relationships between variables or tentative explanations for events. There are two main types of hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0), which is the default position that is tested, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha or H1). Steps in hypothesis testing include establishing the null and alternative hypotheses, selecting a suitable test of significance or test statistic based on sample characteristics, formulating a decision rule to either accept or reject the null hypothesis based on where the test statistic value falls, and understanding the potential for errors. Key criteria for constructing hypotheses and selecting appropriate statistical tests are also outlined.
This document defines key concepts in statistical hypothesis testing. It explains that a statistical hypothesis is a conjecture about a population parameter. The null hypothesis (H0) states that there is no difference between a parameter and a particular value, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) states there is a difference. Tests can be one-tailed if H1 is > or <, or two-tailed if H1 is ≠. Type I and II errors occur if the wrong decision is made regarding H0. The level of significance and critical value help determine whether to reject or fail to reject H0.
To Explain, To Predict, or To Describe?Galit Shmueli
1) The document discusses the differences between explanatory, predictive, and descriptive modeling and evaluation. Explanatory modeling tests causal hypotheses, predictive modeling predicts new observations, and descriptive modeling approximates distributions or relationships.
2) It notes that these goals are different and the same model is not best for all three. Social sciences often focus on explanation while machine learning focuses on prediction.
3) The key aspects that differ for these three types of modeling are the theory, causation versus association, retrospective versus prospective analysis, and focusing on the average unit versus individual units. The best model for one goal is not necessarily best for the others.
This document summarizes a presentation on hypothesis testing. It defines key concepts like the null and alternative hypotheses, type I and type II errors, and one-tailed and two-tailed tests. It then outlines the procedure for hypothesis testing, including setting hypotheses, selecting a significance level, calculating test statistics, and determining whether to reject the null hypothesis. Specific hypothesis tests are described, like paired t-tests for comparing two related samples and tests of proportions. Limitations of hypothesis testing are noted, such as that results are probabilistic and small samples impact reliability.
A chi-squared test (χ2) is basically a data analysis on the basis of observations of a random set of variables. Usually, it is a comparison of two statistical data sets. This test was introduced by Karl Pearson in 1900 for categorical data analysis and distribution. So, it was mentioned as Pearson’s chi-squared test.
The document discusses key concepts related to formulating and testing hypotheses, including:
- Null and alternative hypotheses, which are mutually exclusive statements tested through sample analysis.
- Type I and Type II errors that can occur when making decisions to accept or reject the null hypothesis.
- The level of significance, critical region, and test statistics used to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis.
- The differences between one-tailed and two-tailed tests, parametric vs. non-parametric tests, and one-sample vs. two-sample tests.
Testing of Hypothesis, p-value, Gaussian distribution, null hypothesissvmmcradonco1
This document provides an overview of key concepts in statistical hypothesis testing. It defines what a hypothesis is, the different types of hypotheses (null, alternative, one-tailed, two-tailed), and statistical terms used in hypothesis testing like test statistics, critical regions, significance levels, critical values, type I and type II errors. It also explains the decision making process in hypothesis testing, such as rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis based on whether the test statistic falls within the critical region or if the p-value is less than the significance level.
Tests of significance are statistical methods used to assess evidence for or against claims based on sample data about a population. Every test of significance involves a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (Ha). H0 represents the theory being tested, while Ha represents what would be concluded if H0 is rejected. A test statistic is computed and compared to a critical value to either reject or fail to reject H0. Type I and Type II errors can occur. Steps in hypothesis testing include stating hypotheses, selecting a significance level and test, determining decision rules, computing statistics, and interpreting the decision. Hypothesis tests are used to answer questions about differences in groups or claims about populations.
This document discusses hypothesis testing and various statistical tests used for hypothesis testing including t-tests, z-tests, chi-square tests, and ANOVA. It provides details on the general steps for conducting hypothesis testing including setting up the null and alternative hypotheses, collecting and analyzing sample data, and making a decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. It also discusses types of errors, required distributions, test statistics, p-values and choosing parametric or non-parametric tests based on the characteristics of the data.
This document provides an overview of estimation and hypothesis testing. It defines key statistical concepts like population and sample, parameters and estimates, and introduces the two main methods in inferential statistics - estimation and hypothesis testing.
It explains that hypothesis testing involves setting a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (Ha), calculating a test statistic, determining a p-value, and making a decision to accept or reject the null hypothesis based on the p-value and significance level. The four main steps of hypothesis testing are outlined as setting hypotheses, calculating a test statistic, determining the p-value, and making a conclusion.
Examples are provided to demonstrate left-tailed, right-tailed, and two-tailed hypothesis tests
The document discusses hypothesis testing, including defining the null and alternative hypotheses, types of errors, test statistics, and the process of hypothesis testing. Some key points:
- The null hypothesis states that a population parameter is equal to a specific value. The alternative hypothesis is paired with the null and states inequality.
- Type I errors occur when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. Type II errors occur when the null is not rejected when it is false.
- A test statistic is calculated based on sample data and compared to critical values to determine if the null hypothesis can be rejected.
- Hypothesis testing follows steps of stating hypotheses, choosing a significance level, collecting/analyzing data,
Statistics is used to interpret data and draw conclusions about populations based on sample data. Hypothesis testing involves evaluating two statements (the null and alternative hypotheses) about a population using sample data. A hypothesis test determines which statement is best supported.
The key steps in hypothesis testing are to formulate the hypotheses, select an appropriate statistical test, choose a significance level, collect and analyze sample data to calculate a test statistic, determine the probability or critical value associated with the test statistic, and make a decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on comparing the probability or test statistic to the significance level and critical value.
An example tests whether the proportion of internet users who shop online is greater than 40% using
This document discusses key concepts in hypothesis testing, including:
- The null hypothesis states the assumption to be tested, while the alternative hypothesis is the opposite.
- Type I errors occur when a true null hypothesis is rejected, while type II errors occur when a false null hypothesis is accepted.
- One-tailed tests check for deviations in one direction, while two-tailed tests check both directions.
- The five steps of hypothesis testing are: formulating hypotheses, defining a test statistic, determining the statistic's distribution, defining a critical region, and making a decision using a p-value or test statistic.
This document discusses the key elements of hypothesis testing including:
- Null and alternative hypotheses: statements about population parameters that are mutually exclusive. The null hypothesis represents the status quo while the alternative represents what the researcher wants to test.
- Test statistic: a sample statistic used to evaluate the hypotheses
- Rejection region: values of the test statistic that would lead to rejecting the null hypothesis
- Type I and Type II errors: errors in rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis
It provides examples of how to set up hypotheses for different types of population parameters and test statistics. The goals are to introduce hypothesis testing concepts and show how to establish and test hypotheses.
Day-2_Presentation for SPSS parametric workshop.pptxrjaisankar
This document provides an overview of parametric statistical tests, including t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). It discusses the concepts of statistical inference, hypothesis testing, null and alternative hypotheses, types of errors, critical regions, p-values, assumptions of t-tests, and procedures for one-sample t-tests, independent and paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and repeated measures ANOVA. The document is intended as part of an online workshop on using SPSS for advanced statistical data analysis.
The document outlines the steps for hypothesis testing:
1) Make a formal statement of the null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (Ha). This clearly defines what is being tested.
2) Select a significance level, typically 5% or 1%, which affects factors like sample size and variability.
3) Decide on a distribution, usually normal or t, to determine critical values.
4) Select a random sample, compute a test statistic, and determine the probability of observing a value at least as extreme as the sample statistic if the null hypothesis is true.
5) Compare the probability to the significance level. If it is equal to or below, reject the null hypothesis in favor
Researchers use hypothesis testing to evaluate claims about populations by taking samples and comparing sample statistics to hypothesized population parameters. The four steps of hypothesis testing are:
1) State the null and alternative hypotheses, with the null hypothesis presuming the claim is true.
2) Set criteria for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis.
3) Calculate a test statistic from the sample.
4) Compare the test statistic to the criteria to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis.
Chapter8 introduction to hypothesis testingBOmebratu
Researchers use hypothesis testing to evaluate claims about populations by taking samples and comparing sample statistics to hypothesized population parameters. The four steps of hypothesis testing are:
1) State the null and alternative hypotheses, with the null hypothesis presuming the claim is true.
2) Set criteria for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis.
3) Calculate a test statistic from the sample.
4) Compare the test statistic to the criteria to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis.
Researchers use hypothesis testing to evaluate claims about populations by taking samples and comparing sample statistics to hypothesized population parameters. The four steps of hypothesis testing are:
1) State the null and alternative hypotheses, with the null hypothesis presuming the claim is true.
2) Set criteria for deciding whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
3) Calculate a test statistic from the sample.
4) Compare the test statistic to the criteria to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
(1) Hypothesis testing involves stating a null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis about characteristics of a population.
(2) Key steps include collecting data, specifying assumptions, defining hypotheses, calculating a test statistic, determining its distribution, setting a decision rule, and making a statistical conclusion.
(3) The null hypothesis is tested by calculating a test statistic and comparing it to rejection regions based on the statistic's distribution to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
This document discusses hypothesis testing and the scientific method. It provides details on:
- The key steps of the scientific method including observation, formulation of a question, data collection, hypothesis testing, analysis and conclusion.
- The different types of hypotheses such as simple vs complex, directional vs non-directional, null vs alternative.
- The steps of hypothesis testing including stating the null and alternative hypotheses, using a test statistic, determining the p-value and significance level, and deciding whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
- Examples are given to illustrate hypothesis testing and how the p-value is compared to the significance level to determine if the null hypothesis can be rejected.
Chapter8 Introduction to Estimation Hypothesis Testing.pdfmekkimekki5
1. AT&T argues its rates are similar to competitors, with a mean of $17.09. It sampled 100 customers and recalculated bills based on competitors' rates.
2. The null hypothesis is that the mean is equal to AT&T's $17.09. The alternative hypothesis is that the mean is not equal to $17.09.
3. Using a two-tailed test at a 5% significance level, if the calculated p-value is less than 0.05 we would reject the null hypothesis, concluding the mean is likely not equal to $17.09.
This document discusses hypothesis testing and related statistical concepts. It defines a hypothesis as a statement that can be tested, and distinguishes between the null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (Ha). It explains how to select a significance level, commonly 1%, 5% or 10%, and how this relates to Type I and Type II errors. It also covers one-tailed and two-tailed tests, and when to use z-tests or t-tests to test hypotheses about population means based on sample data. The document provides examples of hypotheses for research topics and how to carry out the statistical tests.
Similar to Chapter 1 biostatistics by Dr Ahmed Hussein (20)
نظرية التطور عند المسلمين (بروفيسور محمد علي البار
ويقدم فيها سردا تاريخيا لنظريات نشأة الخلق وخلق آدم وكيف ان نظرية التطور هي نظرية علمية وليس دينية لكن تم استغلالها لمحاربة الكنيسة
Ethical considerations in research during armed conflicts.pptxDr Ghaiath Hussein
My talk @AUBMC Salim El-Hoss Bioethics Webinar Series. In this webinar, we have discussed the following points:
1- How armed conflicts affect the planning and conduct of research?
2- What is ethically unique about research during armed conflicts?
3- How did my doctoral project approach these ethical issues both at the normative and the empirical levels?
4- What are the lessons learned from the conflicts in the middle east (Sudan, Syria, Yemen, etc.) and how do they differ from the situation in Ukraine?
Acknowledgement: This talk is based on my doctoral thesis (http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/8580/), which was fully funded by Wellcome Trust, UK.
Medically Assisted Dying in (MAiD) Ireland - Mapping the Ethical Terrain (May...Dr Ghaiath Hussein
This document outlines a presentation on mapping the ethical terrain of medically assisted dying (MAiD) in Ireland. It does not take a stance but provides a framework to guide conceptual discussion. It focuses on the decision, decision makers, and outcomes using Canada as an example country that has legalized MAiD. Key ethical questions are raised about patients' autonomy and consent, physicians' conflicting duties, and impacts on public perception and resource allocation. Data from Canada on MAiD providers and annual reported deaths is presented. The conclusion emphasizes the need for evidence from all stakeholders and learning from other jurisdictions' experiences before a decision is made.
Research or Not Research? This Is Not the Question for Public Health Emergencies
November 17, 2021 @ 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm EST
Speaker:
Ghaiath Hussein, Assistant Professor, Medical Ethics and Law, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
About this Seminar:
Public health emergencies, whether natural or man-made, local or global, in peacetime or during armed conflicts are always associated with the need to collect data (and sometimes biological samples) about and from those affected by these emergencies. One of the central questions in the relevant literature is whether the activities that involve the collection of data and/or biological samples are considered ‘research’, with the subsequent endeavour to define what ‘research’ is and whether they should be submitted for ethical approval or not. In this seminar, I will argue that this is not the central question when it comes to research/public health/humanitarian ethics. Using the findings of a systematic review on the research conducted in Darfur and findings from a qualitative project that aimed at defining what constitutes ‘research’ in public health emergencies I will, alternatively, present what I refer to as the ‘ethical characterization’ of these research-like activities and how they can be ethically guided.
Medically assisted dying in (MAiD) Ireland - mapping the ethical terrainDr Ghaiath Hussein
This document provides an outline for a presentation on medically assisted dying (MAiD) in Ireland. It aims to establish an ethical framework for conceptual discussion of MAiD by considering: the decision, the decision makers, and the outcome. It does not endorse any viewpoint. The presentation raises several ethical questions around patient autonomy and consent, concepts of life and death, the role of healthcare providers, and impacts on community and public trust. Examples are provided from Canada, where MAiD is legal, to illustrate challenges in practice. The document stresses the need for evidence from all stakeholders and learning from other jurisdictions' experiences before legalizing MAiD in Ireland.
Our backs are like superheroes, holding us up and helping us move around. But sometimes, even superheroes can get hurt. That’s where slip discs come in.
TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd...Donc Test
TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd Edition by DeMarco, Walsh, Verified Chapters 1 - 25, Complete Newest Version TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd Edition by DeMarco, Walsh, Verified Chapters 1 - 25, Complete Newest Version TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd Edition by DeMarco, Walsh, Verified Chapters 1 - 25, Complete Newest Version Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Pdf Chapters Download Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Pdf Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Study Guide Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Questions and Answers Quizlet Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Studocu Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Quizlet Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Stuvia Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Pdf Chapters Download Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Pdf Download Course Hero Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Answers Quizlet Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Ebook Download Course hero Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Questions and Answers Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Studocu Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Quizlet Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Stuvia Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Pdf Chapters Download Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Pdf Download Stuvia Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Study Guide Questions and Answers Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Ebook Download Stuvia Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Questions Quizlet Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Studocu Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Quizlet Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Stuvia
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...Oleg Kshivets
Overall life span (LS) was 1671.7±1721.6 days and cumulative 5YS reached 62.4%, 10 years – 50.4%, 20 years – 44.6%. 94 LCP lived more than 5 years without cancer (LS=2958.6±1723.6 days), 22 – more than 10 years (LS=5571±1841.8 days). 67 LCP died because of LC (LS=471.9±344 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68% vs. 53.7%) (P=0.028 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: N0-N12, T3-4, blood cell circuit, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells-CC and blood cells subpopulations), LC cell dynamics, recalcification time, heparin tolerance, prothrombin index, protein, AT, procedure type (P=0.000-0.031). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and N0-12 (rank=1), thrombocytes/CC (rank=2), segmented neutrophils/CC (3), eosinophils/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), leucocytes/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (error=0.000; area under ROC curve=1.0).
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Histololgy of Female Reproductive System.pptxAyeshaZaid1
Dive into an in-depth exploration of the histological structure of female reproductive system with this comprehensive lecture. Presented by Dr. Ayesha Irfan, Assistant Professor of Anatomy, this presentation covers the Gross anatomy and functional histology of the female reproductive organs. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in medical science, this lecture provides clear explanations, detailed diagrams, and valuable insights into female reproductive system. Enhance your knowledge and understanding of this essential aspect of human biology.
One health condition that is becoming more common day by day is diabetes.
According to research conducted by the National Family Health Survey of India, diabetic cases show a projection which might increase to 10.4% by 2030.
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptxTina Purnat
• Pitfalls and pivots needed to use AI effectively in public health
• Evidence-based strategies to address health misinformation effectively
• Building trust with communities online and offline
• Equipping health professionals to address questions, concerns and health misinformation
• Assessing risk and mitigating harm from adverse health narratives in communities, health workforce and health system
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotesPsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Integrating Ayurveda into Parkinson’s Management: A Holistic ApproachAyurveda ForAll
Explore the benefits of combining Ayurveda with conventional Parkinson's treatments. Learn how a holistic approach can manage symptoms, enhance well-being, and balance body energies. Discover the steps to safely integrate Ayurvedic practices into your Parkinson’s care plan, including expert guidance on diet, herbal remedies, and lifestyle modifications.
19. Cares of this type of statistical tests to test whether the
sample was selected views of a society with a certain
probability distribution or a particular theory.
This test is used when data is in the form of a nominal or
occurrences and is intended to reconcile the quality
here study how similar occurrences of the sample,
which is usually called loops note Observed with the
expected frequencies Expected variable under study in
the original community.
It uses Chi-Square test statistical comparison between the
observed and expected . If the sample is representative
of the population in frequency and identical with the
value of And cares of this type of statistical tests to test
whether the sample was selected views of a society
with a certain probability distribution or a particular
theory.
20. This test is used when data is in the form of a nominal or occurrences and is
intended to reconcile the quality here study how similar occurrences of
the sample, which is usually called loops note Observed with the expected
frequencies Expected variable under study in the original community.
It uses Chi-Square test statistical comparison between the observed and
expected . If the sample is representative of the population in frequency
and identical with the value of And cares of this type of statistical tests to
test whether the sample was selected views of a society with a certain
probability distribution or a particular theory.
This test is used when data is in the form of a nominal or occurrences and is
intended to reconcile the quality here study how similar occurrences of
the sample, which is usually called loops note Observed with the expected
frequencies Expected variable under study in the original community.
It uses Chi-Square test statistical comparison between the observed and
expected . If the sample is representative of the population in frequency
and identical with the value of Chi-Square is usually zero and increase this
value to be more than zero whenever there is a difference between the
occurrences of the sample (note) and between the occurrences of the
theoretical distribution of the community (expected).
21. Statistical hypotheses:
H0: Views group, which have been selected track the distribution of a particular or
specific probabilistic theory.
HA: Views group, which has been selected for inconsistent with this distribution or a
particular theory.
Test tally: is usually zero and increase this value to be more than zero whenever there
is a difference between the occurrences of the sample (note) and between the
occurrences of the theoretical distribution of the community (expected).
Statistical hypotheses:
H0: Views group, which have been selected track the distribution of a particular or
specific probabilistic theory.
HA: Views group, which has been selected for inconsistent with this distribution or a
particular theory.
Test tally: is usually zero and increase this value to be more than zero whenever there
is a difference between the occurrences of the sample (note) and between the
occurrences of the theoretical distribution of the community (expected).
Statistical hypotheses:
H0: Views group, which have been selected track the distribution of a particular or
specific probabilistic theory.
HA: Views group, which has been selected for inconsistent with this distribution or a
particular theory.
22. Where Oi the observed frequency .
Where Ei the expected frequency.
ii npE i iOn
23. Areas of rejection and acceptance
)(2
v
V is degrees of freedom
is The number of views
24.
25. the decision:
1- We accept the Null hypothesis if (the value of
the Chi-Square Calculated is smaller than the
value of the Chi-Square tabular) that is:
26. 2- We reject the Null hypothesis if (the value of
the Chi-Square Calculated is greater than the
value of the Chi-Square tabular) that is:
27. Example:
One of the researchers selected a sample of size
n = 800 people from a city, and their distribution
by blood type was as follows:
blood typeABABO
Number of people (frequency observed)200150100350
Is this distribution consistent with the distribution of other city members whose
blood distribution was divided according to the following percentages:
blood typeABABO
Percentage of people25%15%15%45%
Use a significant level α= 0.05
28. Answer
Statistical hypotheses:
Ho: There is no difference in the blood groups between the distribution of
the
observed and expected distribution.
H1: There is difference in the blood groups between the distribution of the
observed and expected distribution .
ii npE
360)45.0(800
120)15.0(800
120)15.0(800
200)25.0(800
44
33
22
11
npE
npE
npE
npE
29. blood typeABABO
Number of people (frequency observed)200150100350
The expected frequency200120120360
11.11
360
)360350(
120
)120100(
120
)120150(
200
)200200()( 2222
1
2
2
0
k
i i
ii
E
EO
v=4-1=3
)(2
v
815.7)3(2
05.0
815.7)3(2
05.0
)(22
0 v
Decision
We can reject the null Hypothesis then the type blood in The two cities is
different .