Capacity Planning 
Dimitar Bakardzhiev 
Managing Partner 
Taller Technologies Bulgaria 
@dimiterbak
Capacity Planning is a process 
whereby an organization comes 
together to agree on what they are 
going to focus on in the medium term.
Rather than determine the capacity of 
the organization based on its 
headcount, the capacity is based on 
the capacity of each group within the 
organization.
Purpose of Capacity Planning 
• Provide the organization with focus 
• Agree a backlog based on the constraints that exist 
within the organization 
• Limit Work In Progress for the organization 
• Avoid locally optimized priorities
Outputs from the Capacity Planning 
process 
• An ordered backlog of initiatives that the entire 
organization agrees on. 
• A list of the constraints and options within the 
organization. 
The Capacity Planning does NOT produce a plan or 
schedule of work.
PREPARATION
Participants 
• All key business decision makers. If any are missing 
they may go outside the process to get their Initiative 
done. 
• All groups that look after a particular system, service, 
component or function within the organization 
• Any potentially limited function within the organization
Process 
• Each group calculates its available capacity. The 
default is the number of weeks in the period multiplied 
by number of the teams in group, multiplied by 50%. 
• Create a roughly ordered list of Initiatives 
• An Initiative is a request for capacity in return for value 
• Each Initiative should have an owner who is the 
guardian of the value delivered by the Initiative 
• Each group provides an estimate for the work they will 
need to do per Initiative
The estimates 
• The units for the estimates are group weeks, the work 
that a single group can do in a week. 
• Estimates not a commitment by the group. 
• Ensure that the groups are aware of any work that may 
be required of them in the medium term.
CAPACITY PLANNING
Process 
• Go through the Initiatives in order 
• For each Initiative, check to see if there is enough 
Capacity in each of the groups to deliver all of the work 
in the Initiative. 
• If there is enough capacity, the Initiative is included in 
the backlog and the remaining Capacity of the groups 
is reduced by the amount. Whenever the Capacity of a 
group becomes zero, the group is identified as a 
constraint. 
• Eventually, it will not be possible to do any further 
Initiatives as they all rely on groups that have run out of 
Capacity.
If there is not enough capacity in one 
or more of the groups 
• The decision makers could decide to deselect one of 
the Initiatives that has already been selected in order 
to free up the capacity. 
• An initiative could be reduced in scope. Theoretically it 
should be impossible to reduce something that is 
minimal but given the choice between nothing and 
something, the Initiative Owner will find a way to shave 
some functionality off. 
• The Initiative Owner and Group Owner could defer the 
decision to reject the Initiative by looking for additional 
Capacity.
OUTCOME
• You will find that about 20% of the groups will be 
constraints, having used all of their capacity. About 
60% will have some work on the Corporate Backlog, 
and 20% of groups will have no work on the Corporate 
Backlog. This list is gold dust for the IT management 
team. 
• You now have a backlog agreed by all the key decision 
makers, and the list of constraints in the organization.
References 
Capacity Planning – Chris Matts 
http://theitriskmanager.wordpress.com/2014/08/16/capacity-planning/

Capacity planning

  • 1.
    Capacity Planning DimitarBakardzhiev Managing Partner Taller Technologies Bulgaria @dimiterbak
  • 2.
    Capacity Planning isa process whereby an organization comes together to agree on what they are going to focus on in the medium term.
  • 3.
    Rather than determinethe capacity of the organization based on its headcount, the capacity is based on the capacity of each group within the organization.
  • 4.
    Purpose of CapacityPlanning • Provide the organization with focus • Agree a backlog based on the constraints that exist within the organization • Limit Work In Progress for the organization • Avoid locally optimized priorities
  • 5.
    Outputs from theCapacity Planning process • An ordered backlog of initiatives that the entire organization agrees on. • A list of the constraints and options within the organization. The Capacity Planning does NOT produce a plan or schedule of work.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Participants • Allkey business decision makers. If any are missing they may go outside the process to get their Initiative done. • All groups that look after a particular system, service, component or function within the organization • Any potentially limited function within the organization
  • 8.
    Process • Eachgroup calculates its available capacity. The default is the number of weeks in the period multiplied by number of the teams in group, multiplied by 50%. • Create a roughly ordered list of Initiatives • An Initiative is a request for capacity in return for value • Each Initiative should have an owner who is the guardian of the value delivered by the Initiative • Each group provides an estimate for the work they will need to do per Initiative
  • 9.
    The estimates •The units for the estimates are group weeks, the work that a single group can do in a week. • Estimates not a commitment by the group. • Ensure that the groups are aware of any work that may be required of them in the medium term.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Process • Gothrough the Initiatives in order • For each Initiative, check to see if there is enough Capacity in each of the groups to deliver all of the work in the Initiative. • If there is enough capacity, the Initiative is included in the backlog and the remaining Capacity of the groups is reduced by the amount. Whenever the Capacity of a group becomes zero, the group is identified as a constraint. • Eventually, it will not be possible to do any further Initiatives as they all rely on groups that have run out of Capacity.
  • 12.
    If there isnot enough capacity in one or more of the groups • The decision makers could decide to deselect one of the Initiatives that has already been selected in order to free up the capacity. • An initiative could be reduced in scope. Theoretically it should be impossible to reduce something that is minimal but given the choice between nothing and something, the Initiative Owner will find a way to shave some functionality off. • The Initiative Owner and Group Owner could defer the decision to reject the Initiative by looking for additional Capacity.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    • You willfind that about 20% of the groups will be constraints, having used all of their capacity. About 60% will have some work on the Corporate Backlog, and 20% of groups will have no work on the Corporate Backlog. This list is gold dust for the IT management team. • You now have a backlog agreed by all the key decision makers, and the list of constraints in the organization.
  • 15.
    References Capacity Planning– Chris Matts http://theitriskmanager.wordpress.com/2014/08/16/capacity-planning/

Editor's Notes

  • #5 The purpose of Capacity Planning is to provide the organization with focus. To agree a backlog based on the constraints that exist within the organization. Rather than determine the capacity of the organization based on its headcount, the capacity is based on the capacity of each group within the organization. Without an organizational backlog, there is a very real chance that the organization will end up with too much work in progress because each group will seek to develop their own locally optimized priority.
  • #9 The 50% is based on the work of Todd Little.