This document discusses behaviourist learning theory and its key concepts of habits and errors in language learning. It explains that behaviourism views language learning as habit formation through stimulus-response associations that are strengthened by reinforcement or punishment. Errors occur due to interference from habits already formed in the first language. The similarities and differences between the first and second languages influence whether habits transfer positively or negatively, facilitating or inhibiting second language acquisition. Behaviourism aimed to avoid errors by breaking down language into discrete habits that could be systematically practiced and mastered.
It is importantto understand the main
tenets of behaviourist learning theory to
comprehend the early importance attached
to the role of the first language in second
language acquisition.
Views of language learning were derived
from a theory of learning in general (up to
the end of 1960s)
Language learningis a habit formation and
habits are strengthened by reinforcement.
Responses take place when particular stimuli
are present .
A particular response along with a particular
stimulus constitute a habit.
Watson(1924) and Skinner(1957) wanted to
know how habits were established.
8.
CHARACTERISTICS OF HABITS
Observable
•Objectsthat could be
touched
•Actions that could be
observed
Automatic
•Habits were
performed
spontaneously
•Were difficult to
eliminate unless
environmental
changes led to the
extinction of stimuli
9.
Watson gavea theory of classical
behaviourism where the stimulus was said
to “elicit” the response.
Stimulus occurred frequently and
sufficiently
the response became practised
then became automatic
10.
Skinner gavea different account of habit
development in his neo-behaviourism
theory where he played down the
importance of stimulus.
He said that it was not possible to state
what stimulus was responsible for a
particular response.
He emphasized the consequences of the
response.
11.
According toSkinner, the learning of a habit
occurred through imitation or
reinforcement.
It means the learner is able to make a
connection with consequences associated
with his/her behaviour through positive
(rewarding) and negative (punishment)
reinforcement.
12.
Theories ofHabit Formation could be and
were applied to language learning.
In L1 acquisition, children were said to
master their mother tongue by imitating
utterances produced by adults .
Their efforts at using language were either
rewarded or corrected.
It was also believed that SLA could proceed
in a similar way.
14.
Learners couldidentify the stimulus-
response associations that constituted the
habits of L2 by the means of imitation and
reinforcement.
Language learning (first and second) was
most successful when the task was broken
down into a number of stimulus-response
links.
Thus it could be systematically practised and
mastered one at a time.
15.
Habit formation theoryprovided a
theoretical account of how the
learner’s L1 intruded into the
process of SLA.
It also explained why the L2 learners
made errors.
• According tobehaviourist learning theory,
old habits get in the way of learning new
habits.
• According to Bright and McGregor,
'the grammatical apparatus programmed into
the mind as the first language interferes with
the smooth acquisition of the second.'
Interference hasa central place in
behaviourist accounts of SLA.
Interference is the result of what is
called "proactive inhibition ".
21.
Here, theprevious learning prevents the
learning of new habits.
An error is likely to arise in L2 where first and
second language share a meaning but
expresses it different way.
22.
PATTERNS AND HABITS
Sometimes the patterns or habits of
the L1 are as same as L2.
It is quit possible that the means of
expressing a shared meaning are the
same in the first and second language.
Transfer willtake place from the first to
second language.
Differences between the first and second
language create learning difficulty which
results in errors while the similarities
between the first and second language
facilitate rapid and easy learning.
25.
In behaviourist accountsof SLA, errors were
considered undesirable.
There was a danger of errors becoming in
their own right if they were tolerated.
Brooks(1960), for instance wrote, “ Like sin,
error is to be avoided and its influence
overcome…”
26.
Errors ,according to behaviourist theory, were
the result of non-learning, rather than
wrong learning.
There was almost total agreement that errors
should be avoided.
Attempts were made to predict when they
would occur.