This Project analyses the locations which are assumed to be provided by a shopping mall which is trying to extend its network at Banepa. We are provided with three areas of Banepa whose topographical information is to be collected and among these areas we have selected a working site and based on certain parameters we have divided this site into a number of appropriate locations. This presentation was given at Kathmandu University during 3rd year Engineering Project of Geomatics Engineering study.

1. Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering
Kathmandu University
Dhulikhel,Kavre
Project Members
Tina Baidar
Archana Kecy
Suresh Manandhar
Uttam Pudasaini
Kamal Shahi Thakuri
Project Supervisor
Er.Subash Ghimire
Er.Ganesh Dhakal
Project Incharge
Prof.Dr.Ramesh Kumar Maskey

2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE
 Introduction
 Rationale
 Scope of work
 Objectives
 Resources Used
 Methodology
 Outcomes
 Conclusion
 Project Schedule
 References
2

3. INTRODUCTION
 Shopping Mall
 Place to purchase daily requirements of every individual
 A single location with multiple advantage
 Site Selection
 Appropriate location from given areas
 Selection based on analysis of data collected from surveying

4. RATIONALE
 Banepa is overcrowded with street
markets
 Decrease in the beauty of city
 Need of organized shopping trend
 To help the business agency of
Kathmandu in selecting a site for
construction of Shopping Mall
4
Fig: Organized Shopping inside a
Shopping Mall

5. SCOPE OF WORK
 Preparation of a map showing the possible locations in the
selected area
 Constructional and structural aspect of the building are out of
scope

6.  Main Objective
 To analyze the suggested sites and propose a location
for construction of shopping mall
 Sub Objectives
 To map and analyze the data using GIS
 To gain knowledge about site selection procedure
6

7. RESOURCES USED
Instruments Used
7
Measuring Tape
Theodolite
Staff
Softwares Used
• Microsoft office Package
• ArcGIS
• Google Earth

8. METHODOLOGY
Desk study
Literature
review
Coordinate
Computations
and Error
Adjustment
Mapping and
Data analysis
Field works
Traverse and
Tacheometry
8

9. DS
9
Site near to water
resource ,No
discharge data
Selected as working
siteFar from
settlement areas
Source: Google Earth,2012-07-24,5:55pm

10. Working Area
Source :Google earth,7/24/2012;6:44PM

11. FILED WORKS
 Closed Traverse
 7 traverse stations and a BM
 Took coordinate of BM and station(T1) using GPS
 Relative Accuracy of Traverse::1:9000
 Tacheometry
 T2 Theodolite with a stadia Diaphragm was used for
detailing

12. Source:Google Earth(2012-07-02,5:55pm)
Closed Traverse

13. COORDINATE COMPUTATION AND ERROR
ADJUSTMENT
 Took coordinate of BM and station(T1) using GPS
 Error adjustment using Bowditch rule
 Relative Accuracy of Traverse 1:9000

14. COORDINATES OF TRAVERSE STATIONS
SN Easting(m) Northing(m) Elevation(m)
1 355784.000 3056589.000 1470.000
2 355837.344 3056604.336 1477.286
3 355899.526 3056659.384 1480.924
4 355893.009 3056721.580 1483.501
5 355822.875 3056737.559 1483.720
6 355777.835 3056686.583 1479.099
7 355773.441 3056645.795 1473.844
BM 355776.000 3056602.000 1470.5

15. MAPPING AND DATAANALYSIS
15
Plot Detail
Points
Topographical
Map
Preparation
Buffer of Road
Network
Buffer of
Transmission
Line
DEM
Generation
Slope Model
Map
Appropriate
Location
Selection

16. DATA PLOTTING

17. PREPARATION OF TOPOGRAPHICAL
MAP
 Scale: 1:1200
 Total Area: 37,224
sq.m.
 Projection System
 Everest-
Bangladesh
Transverse
Mercator

18. BUFFER CREATION
 A type of proximity
computation in GIS
 35 m buffer of Araniko
Highway
 10m Buffer of high voltage
Transmission line
Fig:Buffer of 500 m around a road

20. DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL
 Digital representation of ground surface topography
 Includes modeling of terrain parameters(slope, aspect,
gradient)
Description of shape of
ground surface in terms of
elevation

21.  A continuous raster
representation
 No. of columns,
rows=251,290
 Cell size=1.0036148

24. OUTCOMES
 A Map showing appropriate locations within the suggested
area
 A Topographical map of the suitable working site at a scale
1:1200
 A continuous raster representation as Digital Elevation Model
of the area

25. CONCLUSION
 Rejected two sites because of specified reasons
 Third site at Budol, Banepa was selected as working site
 Three Locations were selected as appropriate locations
 Map prepared by us are useful documents for the
concerned authority

26. PROJECT SCHEDULE
S.N Weeks
Activities
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Project title selection
2 Desk study and supervisor
consultancy
3 Proposal defense
4 Reccee
5 Surveying and data collection
6 Computation and plotting
7 Topographical map and DEM
preparation
8 Mid term presentation
9 Analysis on prepared map and
location selection
10 Final report preparation
11 Final presentation

27. REFERENCES
 Arora,K.R.(2008) “Surveying Volume-1”,Rajsons Publication Pvt.
Ltd. New Delhi
 Chang,Kang-tsung (2008)”Introduction to GIS” ,Tata McGraw
Hill Education Pvt. Ltd.New Delhi
 Michigan gov.(2010),’I’nformation about site selection
considerations.pdf’’
 Gomarasca, Maria (2010),”Major factors in Industrial
location.pdf”, Springer publication, London
27

28. 28

29. QUERIES?
29