This document summarizes Callum Burton's FMP evaluation. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of his research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aesthetic qualities, and audience appeal of his prison escape game product. It also includes 3 peer reviews which provide feedback on improving graphics quality, adding sound effects and music, and making character legs move more realistically. Callum agrees with the feedback about making the game longer and improving character movement, but does not disagree with any of the feedback.

1. FMP Evaluation
Callum Burton

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
• A strength of my research was looking at existing products before I made
my product because it helped give me more new and better ideas on what
type of project I wanted. Another strength is that it helped me decide
what layout I wanted.
• A weakness is that my ideas may have been too similar to ideas that
already exist. Another weakness is that the research was hard because I
didn’t know what I was looking for.
• A weakness of my research is that the product isn’t very detailed. Another
weakness is that it was really hard to find the right images I wanted to use
in my product.
• I could of done better by improving the detail and colours for my product
which will make it look better. It would have a positive effect on the
product because more people would be interested in it and want to play
which would make the game look better.

4. Planning
• A strength at planning for my product is that you can see what your going
to create before you even make it. The part of my planning which helped
with this was the layout pages because you can see what you are going to
make. Another strength is that we can pick our resources beforehand
which will save time. The part which helped me was the initial plan.
• Another strength of my planning was the mind-map I created because it
helped me by helping me figure out what kind of game I wanted to make.
A weakness of my planning is my mind-map and Moodboard are very
limited and to improve next time I would have to put more into the both
of them which could help by helping me make something better.
• I can do better next time by putting a lot more detail into my planning. It
would have a positive effect because it can help me make a better product
which will be much more detailed.

5. Time Management
• I managed my time well and I completed my product on time. If I had
more time I could improve my product and the planning by putting in a lot
more detail into them.
• A positive would be I did everything that I wanted to do and completed it
in the given time. I managed to keep on track and complete the product
before the given time
• With more time I could improve on my designs by improving the designs
and turning the game into a full on prison escape game.

6. Technical QualitiesIt is well detailed It’s not well detailed
This game has
multiple choices on
how to escape the
prison
This game only has
one choice.
It has cut
scenes
Has no cut scenes
Prison escape
game
Prison
escape game
Has a few
colours
Has a few colours.
Has lots of guards
Has one guard

7. Aesthetic Qualities
I think my work looks
good and it is creative
because it’s an original.
The aspects of the
poster’s visuals I like are
that the colours suit the
image and it looks cool.
I would improve the detail
by putting more detail into
the colour and image.
A strength would be that it
looks cool and it has a few
colours on.
A weakness is that it isn’t
very detailed and isn’t very
colourful.

8. Audience Appeal
I appealed to the target
audience by making a
prison escape game which
involves a ninja and is
colourful.
I think the image appeals
to the target audience
because it is colourful and
looks cool.
The image is colourful and
the ninja is well created. The
title of the game and the
background together show
the audience what the game
is about.
I think the colours appeal to
the audience because they
suit the kind of game it is and
they make the game look
cool.

9. Peer
Feedback

10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– The colours were bright and bold, defiantly something
that will attract the audience. The graphics look
detailed too and move freely within animation
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• Maybe the graphics can be a little less blurry, also
some music and sound effects could be added for
a more interesting effect.

11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked the music and the sound effects used in the
game
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– I would make it a bit longer

12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– The backing track and the sound effects match the
theme of the game really well. The characters were in
a lot of detail as well.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• I would have the legs move backwards and
forwards when the characters moves.

13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
– I agree that I should make the legs go back and
forward when moving and to make it longer.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback? I don’t disagree with any of the
feedback.

14. Peer Feedback Summary
I would improve the product by making the game longer and making the legs more
forward when moving because the game is too short and the game characters should be
more realistic by having the legs move.