The document summarizes the student's evaluation of their FMP project. Some key points: - Research was effective but took more time than planned, limiting improvements. - Planning helped work efficiently but attention span was a weakness. - Time management was inconsistent, impacting quality. Equal time per section is needed. - Peer feedback noted good animation/colors but suggested more sound effects and action. - The student agrees more sound effects and action are needed to make the game more interesting.

1. FMP Evaluation
Your name

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
• The main strengths of my research in this section was that I could identify
what bits needed to be researched and what bits didn’t, this is good
because it means I can save time on things I already now and don’t know. I
could also effectively work and get things done really quick which helped
me with later things like designing the game.
• One main thing that icould of improved on was the amount of time that it
did my research, even though I was focusing on my main sections it still
took me awhile to find things to do for my research. This was a major
downfall because then I had to spend more time doing it. All this time
waisted could of given me more time to improve on my final production, I
could of improved the look of my game and this would have had major
positive impacts.

4. Planning
• Planning helped me create a good product because I could efficiently
work, this is because I could plan ahead and by the time I got to that
section I would already know what I was doing. This really did help me
save time wasted on research. It also helped me create a more finished
product because I was doing everything when I got to it I could do bit bu
bit sections and still finish everything at the same time.
• Some major weaknesses of my planning was that I didn’t know what to do
sometimes so I was a little lost at times, this didn’t waist much time
though because I would ask for help and would be back on my way.
• Another weakness that I could improve was my attention span, this was
one downfall because I would get bored easily and start looking at
something else, this was the major problem in this section.

5. Time Management
• My time management was not the best. This is because I would spend lots
of time on one section then I would spend little time on another. This was
bad because some bits looked much better than others and this made the
animation game look bad. One major advantage that did come out of the
bad time management was that some sections was really well done so you
have to look at the positives.
• The thing that I would do better is set a timer of equal time so very section
gets the same treatment. This would greatly increase the productivity and
amount of how much deatil would go into the bits that mainly need it.
This would also make all the sections look of equal amount.

6. Technical Qualities
similar to Pac man. The same idea
y game, the paths and the type of
a different design of my ghost but
s taken from Pac man. I used none
ours that you see in Pac man, my
alistic with the colours except my
d a dark reddish colour. I like Pac
e main reason why I basically took
nd re designed it into my own
anged the colour of my paths to a
s so you can see everything that is
the paths

7. Aesthetic Qualities
My work does not look the best out there but I am happy with what I have
created, this is because I have created this and so I should be happy with
myself. My product was not as creative as it could've been but still it has
some elements of creativity in there for example know body else did this
idea so therefor it was creative because it’s a brand new game and idea all
together. Some main things that I like in my game is the design of the ghosts
and other characters. This is because they are very unique for the size of
th3m and how I managed to incorporate them into the game. The main
things that I would improve in my course work would be the overall layout
of the game. This is because I had some more ideas I would've liked to try
out. I would improve this by changing the layout of the game and overall
concept.
The main strengths in my aesthetics is the colours, I feel like the colours
change the animation game dramatically. And this is good because its nice
and more enjoyable. One disadvantage of the aesthetics is the design of the
map and the concept of the game, the both don’t really go together and so
takes the emotion out of it.

8. Audience Appeal
The way I have appealed to my target audience is by putting In the
things that appeal to them, so I put in the required colours that they mainly
like and the style of game that they would like. But I feel the two do not go
together. main things that I would and try and I get out there would be the
fun aspect side of it, this would be best because if they didn’t know the game
as good then why should they play the game. I wouldn't really try and stick
anything on my target audience as well because if they feel uncomfortable
them they wouldn’t want to play the game anyway.

9. Peer
Feedback

10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– The animation was very good and creative.
– The animation had lots of colours that stood out.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product? The could have been more
interesting but nothing else needs improving

11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– The animation game was very well made and the
sound effects went perfectly with the background
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• There could have been a lot more sound effects
to make the game a little bit more interesting

12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– The game was made well and the colours of
everything matched th style of game.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product? It could be more interesting
because there was not a lot happening so more
action could be incorporated into the animation

13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback? I agree with most things from the
lack of action to the lack of sound effects
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback? I disagree that my animation wasn’t
interesting because it shows everything there
is needed for a susoence chase

14. Peer Feedback Summary
The main changes I would do is to add a lot more sound effects. This is
because it would make the game 10 times more interesting because
know body wants to play a boring game. I would also add some more
action to the game and some explosions just for fun so it doesn’t seem
like a boring game. Some other changes I would make would be to
improve the background slightly, this is because there needs to be
more depth to the game so it doesn’t seem bleak and boring.