The peer feedback praised aspects like the target age rating appealing to the intended audience, and the use of different animals on the cover providing a glimpse into the documentary's content. However, suggestions for improvement included adding a back cover to the DVD case to follow standard templates, and making the title design more polished and professional-looking. The feedback was overall positive while providing constructive criticism to strengthen certain technical and aesthetic qualities.

1. FMP Evaluation
Your name

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
The research was helpful because I could look at the key features of my
documentary poster . This was helpful because it shows how the poster for a
similar product like the one I intended to create, this is helpful because I get to
see and understand the different techniques they use on there poster, such as:
Location, angle, effect, post production, lighting, composition, mise en scene,
costume, props, colours, font and audience appeal. I did this four different times
for four different products similar to mine and overall it was helpful. I then found
it more helpful by doing questionnaires to see what to put in my final product. I
them analysed what feedback I got and made the poster on what ideas other
people gave me.
The research was unhelpful because it slowed me down to put more detail on
over slides. This would mean I would of got higher grade, if I had more time on
the other parts of the project. The effect of this is that I lose marks on the project.
Another problem was that it was confusing and didn’t give clear questions on
what to do. The effect is that I couldn’t make clear answers and achieve a clearer
answer.

4. Planning
• The planning I did for my final product was to choose a style of font and
colours that would go amazingly with the documentary poster, therefore
grabbing the readers attention. I then collected images that were similar or
inspired me to do the documentary poster I wanted to achieve. I then created
the layout plan for the documentary poster and DVD cover, this helped me
dramatically as I knew/gave me a idea of what the layout was going to be for
my final product poster and DVD cover. The strengths of my planning where to
find the right colours and font style. This improved my final product by
grabbing the viewers attention. I then found myself being great at choosing
the right images as this would achieve a better mark for my final product as it
would help me and educate me to make it better.
• The weakness of my planning was spending to much time on the style sheet
this effected other parts of the planning as I didn’t have much time on the
layout and location and prop slides as I was confused on what to do for the
style sheet.

5. Time Management
• I did not mange my time well as I wished I had do more work and detail on
other parts. I do think if I were to do this again I would successfully
complete many projects on time and be well detailed. For example I
focused more on the graphic design experiment than making the real
thing. I do think if I were to do this again I would defiantly focus on the
more important projects as this would greatly improve my grade,
therefore I would of added better effects to the real thing. Overall if I
would had additional time I would have made better designs and better
effects to the overall piece.

6. Technical Qualities
The background is
similar as the
forest/nature look
refreshing and eye
opening.
Both posters are to do
with nature however
mine is to survival and
nature.
My poster is different
as the bird is holding
the metal plate with
the documentary
name on it. On the
other poster the bird is
not holding anything.
This tells us the other
poster is more about
nature than survival
They both have birds
which tell us how
adventurous the
documentaries each
are.
My poster is different
as the birds are not
the same species and
in my poster the bird is
flying, where in the
other one its not. This
tells the viewer how
amazing and exciting
my poster is.
In my poster the title
has a different font
and colour as the
other poster. This is
because mine font
and colour grabs the
viewers attention.
In my poster you
can see a snakes,
however in the
other poster it
does not have
different animals.
This tells me its
not about survival
of the fittest
where my poster
is.
In my poster it has
a camp fire where
the other one it
does not. This tells
mine is about
survival where the
other one is not.

7. Aesthetic Qualities
My work looks inspiring and delightful to the human eye. This shouts to the
viewer its about a documentary. I do think its creative as it shows how wild
and vast the wilderness can be. My favourite visual is the DVD cover as it
shows how dangerous yet so kind. It also seems soft and warm to the eye.
The specific image I like is the camp fire as it brings warmth and safety to the
documentary poster. I feel I could improve the design of the animals by
making a better edge. I could do this by using the magic wand tool to create a
smoother and sharper image that would stand out to the viewer. I do feel it
could improved by making the house appeal more to the audience. I could of
done this by selecting a better image. The image tells me how adventurous
and enjoyable the outside can be. I do think the work needs improving as the
eagle has not been cropped sharply and smoothly as I hopped. I would of
used the magic wand tool if I were to do this again as it would make it sharper
and bolder to the audience therefore making them want to know more. The
strengths are that it tells the audience how adventurous and unique the
outdoors can be.

8. Audience Appeal
I have appealed to 16-34, the reason I have chosen this target market is because its
channels 4s target market. For my audience research I created a questionnaire in which
they told me what type of audience I should aim at, for example the age and social status
(the persons specific personality). I believe I have appealed to my target audience because
I have focused on aiming at 16-34 years old and focused on aiming at the personality of
people interested in discovery and survival. My audience was interested in the idea of me
stopping in a forest over night, I intended to do this to appeal to my target audience
however due to bad weather on the day I intended to film it I was unable to.
According to my audience they wanted me to under go a difficult hard-core survival task
and I intend to do so on my final project however for this project I was unable to appeal to
them in this respect due to bad weather on filming on the day. My audience also ask for on
the questionnaire that I am a companied by other people in order to make surviving the
night more interesting, I had all this prepared and organised people to go with me how
ever I was unable to do so because of bad weather.

9. Peer
Feedback

10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– “I like the age rating as it tells me who the target audience
is and like the idea of different animals on the cover as it
gives you a glimpse of what to expect to see.”
• What improvements could have been made to the
product?
• “I think the the DVD cover should have a back cover
like all normal DVD covers do however it doesn't’t and
doesn't’t follow a template for one that doesn't’t mean
its not good it could jut make it better”

11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– “what I like about this product are the fabulous
settings that create a atmosphere the creatures shows
what will be included in the film”.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– “I think the title should be more improved and more
professional”.

12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?

13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?

14. Peer Feedback Summary