https://www.irjet.net/archives/V7/i1/IRJET-V7I181.pdf

1. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 01 | Jan 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 426
A Review Study on Urban Sprawl
Sahil Patel1, Sejal S Bhagat 2
1Student of Town & Country Planning, Sarvajanik College of Engineering &Technology, Surat
2Professor of Town & Country Planning, Sarvajanik College of Engineering &Technology, Surat
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Urban sprawl is an issue that has allocated many
discussions to itself in academic, policymaking and
government departments. Although sprawl is an American
phenomenon, however it ought to beindicatedthatitisunique
by using environmental, economic, social and political
situations. In the latest decades, the urbanboomhasnolonger
been adopted with residents' needs and due to this process,
many lands were applied for construction. Regarding
mentioned issues in cities, this text tries to surveys the
consequences of sprawl by way of precise cognition of
characteristics and reasons and introduces appropriate
guidelines at the give up on it. Controlling travels,
participation in providing infrastructures costs, controlling
boom and protection of landsandredevelopmentofinner-core
regions are a number of proposed policies
Key Words: urban sprawl,characteristics,result,controlling
policies, upward mobility, Social mobility, Urban sprawl.
1. INTRODUCTION
Urban sprawl is one of the issues in the towns nowadays. In
the beyond decade’s towns had outline and particular
boundaries, but they have neglected their geographical
regions by immoderate boom today. The word “Urban
Sprawl” means an extra boom than the same old and what
makes it different from the urban increase is this excessive
nature. Cities generally tend toboomandplannedincreaseis
reached while there is the appropriate proportion between
urban increase and concrete organism. But whilst the boom
is more than usual, its stress at the boundaries, the city will
face new most important troubles. The fast pace of the
world’s urban population growth, particularly in growing
countries, is one of the essential challenges for governments
and making plans agencies. Today, three.9 billion people—
54 percent of the world’s population—are living in urban
regions and are predicted to reach three billionin2050,with
nearly 90 percent of the future urban population increase
being in growing world towns (United Nations, 2015).
Without any doubt, this trend has been a good-sized spatial
manifestation and will maintain in the future. The inevitable
outcomes from this method are the spatial growth of towns
and towns beyond their juridical limits and into their
hinterlands and peripheries which will accommodate the
growing city population. In this condition, we will want to
conform to this process. Therefore, effectivegovernanceand
making plans to attain a more sustainable urban form are
important for city planners and coverage makers. In other
words, city-regions and their spatial extensionareneeded to
reduce wasteful use of non-renewable resources, to avoid
the disruption of the ecological equilibrium, to lessen social
inequities, and to sell inclusiveandsustainabledevelopment.
2. Characteristics and Controlling Policies of urban
sprawl
There are many definitions of urban sprawl. In the oxford
dictionary, it has been described as “the disorganized and
unattractive enlargement of an urbanorindustrial placeinto
the adjoining countryside”. In the other references,
according to their viewpoints and goals, they have
emphasized on special factors. The European Environment
Agency (EEA) has defined sprawl as the bodily sample of
low-density expansion of huge urban areas,beneath-market
conditions, in particular into the surrounding agricultural
areas. Sprawl is the leading fringe of urban growth and
implies little planning manipulate of land subdivision.
Development is patchy, scattered and strungout, witha bent
for discontinuity. It leap-frogs over regions, leaving
agricultural enclaves. Downs believes that sprawl does no
longer mean every type of increase and it has a definiteform
that may be introduced as unlimited outward extension of
development, low-density residential and industrial
settlements, leapfrog development,fragmentationofpowers
over land use amongst many small localities, dominance of
transportation by means of private automobilevehicles,loss
of centralized planning or control of land uses, enormous
strip commercial development, notable financial disparities
amongst localities, segregation ofkindsoflanduseinone-of-
a-kind zones, and reliance at the trickle-down or filtering
method to offer housing to low-earnings households. As it
was noted, sprawl has a few characteristicsthatdifferentiate
it from different forms of urban boom and specialists have
one-of-a-kind viewpoints approximately its reasons.
Bruckner and Fansler studies in 40 United States urbanized
areas inside the US by surveying indicators such as
agricultural land price, commuting expenditure, income,
show that sprawl is a result that has received overtime.Rely
on Miezkowski & Mills researches,urbansprawl isa resultof
income and populace boom, transportation structures
improvements, range in preference of customers and
opposition for land. These are herbal signs.Someothersigns
consisting of excessive taxation, crimes, broken
infrastructures; numbers of educational facilities have
visible in central areas and give a boost to urban sprawl. A
third principle of what may reason more urban
decentralization is primarily basedonwhathasbeentermed
the “fiscalization of land use”. Bruckner believes that
growing in earnings and population and decreasing in
commuting costs purpose to sprawl. Increasing in
population emerges the wishes to space. From a different

2. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 01 | Jan 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 427
point, by using profits boom, residents tend to larger homes
and as a reaction to this problem, excessive approaches and
infrastructures will be built. Land cost is the opposite
element that has stated in studies. From the Ewing
viewpoint, 4 elements cause city sprawl: customer
preference, technological innovation, subsidies and public
and quasi- public goods. After surveying the traits and
reasons for urban sprawl, we will remember the wonderful
and negative effects of this phenomenon. Regardless of
advantageous aspects of city sprawl, the maximum of the
viewpoints recollects on negative consequences. Part of
these refers to core-placetroubles.Wecanpointouttroubles
that include a concentration of poverty, low exceptional
educational centers and lack of economic resources. In
transportation, sprawl reason to greater commuting, long
travels, and extra congestion. Householdsareina position to
skip more distances to get admission to better housing,
educational centers, and task and it intensifies via getting
entry to infrastructures. Sprawl will increase the fee of
infrastructures. We can mention a few examples including
excessive ways, parking, water, electricity costs. In addition,
it will purpose of using more electricity, the emergence of
pollutants and getting rid of lands. Living in these regions
additionally has many psychic and social costs. We can
identify two types of psychic expenses: deprivationofaccess
and environmental deprivation. Finally, we can declare that
sprawl has special outcomes in three levels of cities, new
districts, and metropolitan regions. Sprawl affects old
facilities and cities by the creation ofthelatestproblemsthat
motive missing aggressive power. In new districts, it causes
making ready new infrastructures, generating more travels,
getting rid of agricultural land and reduction of social
interactions. The third stage of effects that impact
metropolitan regions is growing infrastructure charges,
destructive to environmental resources, the use of extra
power and increasing pollutants.
3. CONCLUSIONS
In this research with the aid of surveying urban sprawl
characteristics and definitions, we delivered this
phenomenon. After this step, by way of surveying literature,
we expressed its causes. According to outcomes, major
reasons to emersion this phenomenon are populace and
earnings boom, low rate of lands, access to suitable housing
and low costs of infrastructures and transportation. But no
matter the advantageous consequences of city sprawl, this
issue finally leads to some issues in cities, new districts and
concrete areas that we will mention to saynoininternal city,
traffic and congestion, lengthy travels, increase in
infrastructure prices and reductionof environmental quality
and social interactions. Therefore, according to these
problems we have to utilize suitable guidelines. Participate
in providing infrastructure costs, manipulate travels, create
city limitations, redevelopment of inner-core regions, aid
smart increase strategies, growth density and create a
compact city, electricity thepositionoflocal governmentand
efficient control are examples that may be used as
appropriate policies for the stated problem. In the end,
overstated points we have to indicate that no matter
proposed rules, there may be no precise answer to this
problem and it wishes greater researches in exclusive
aspects. Moreover, in keeping with the regions and cities
traits, we'd do policymaking andapplyappropriatesolutions
to govern urban sprawl. The role of city policies, private
sectors, city government and planners inthistrendaresome
critical subjects which have been left out in a maximum of
surveyed studies and consequently,theywanttobesimilarly
researched. According to the bad results of city sprawl, it's
far vital to develop rules to decrease its bad effects. There
are many regulations that everyone concentrates on a
distinct aspect of this trouble.
• Control travels: Surveys indicate that decreasing the
number of private auto ownership is one of the foremost
techniques for controlling sprawl. More taxation and toll
gate is the other solution.
• Create city limitations: Urban obstacles in edges of towns
will manipulate city sprawl. In this regard, the handiest
constructing in inner districts may be allowed and concrete
size will not be extended.
• Participate in providing infrastructure costs: Surveys
display that city sprawl has got expenses 20 times greater
than the normal boom due to needs to news ways, schools,
housing and public services. So growing resident’s
percentage of fees performs a critical role in controlling
sprawl.
• Betterment of low-earnings household’s residing
conditions: One vital part of citizens in the suburb is folks
that migrate for the development of their family life. Paying
monetary credits, instruction of low-cost housing and local
subsidies are a few solutions for improving their living
conditions.
• Redevelopment of inner-core regions: This action causes
growth in urban land charges. Usage of lands and
enterprising in industrial deserted lands, blank business
plots and metro stations areas, rehabilitation of abandoned
homes and historic homes are a few examples of this policy.
• Control boom and protection of lands: Open areas have
high-cost tax determination for changing land uses causes a
lower within the charge of land changes.
• Urban consolidation: Urban consolidation has been
introduced as an answer for more appropriate utilization of
lands and infrastructures inside the built-up area of a city. It
interests restriction of the use of urban lands, a discount of
infrastructure charges, and using greater public
transportation.
• Support smart growth strategies: Smart increase
concentrate on compact development and redevelopment
constructed up to a place in a city.

3. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 01 | Jan 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 428
• Creative and efficient management:offeringinnovative city
guidelines will cause the appropriate increase. So, planners
should be able to determine the cost and path of
development and its prices.
REFERENCES
[1] European Environment Agency. Urban Sprawl in
Europe, the Ignored Challenge. European Commission:
Joint Research Center 2006: 6, 23, 24–5.
[2] Downs A. Some realities about sprawl and urban
decline. Housing Policy Debate 1999; 10(4): 955–73.
[3] Brueckner JK.Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies.
International Regional ScienceReview2000;23:160–71.
[4] Gordon P, Richardson H. Critiquing sprawl’s critics.
Policy Analysis 2000, 365: 1–18.
[5] Ewing R, Pendall R, Chen D. Measuring Sprawl and its
Impact. Washington: Smart Growth America; 2008: 2–
31.
[6] Ewing R. Is Los Angeles-Style sprawled desirable?
Journal of the American Planning Association 1997;
63(1): 107–126.
[7] Galster J, Hanson R, Ratcliffe MR, Wolman H, Coleman S,
Freihage F. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining
and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy
Debate 2001; 12(4): 681-717.
[8] Sierra Club. The Dark Side of the American Dream: The
Costs and Consequences of Suburban Sprawl. College
Park, MD: Challenge to Sprawl Campaign; undated.
[9] Glaeser E, Kahn M, Chu Ch. Job Sprawl: Employment
Location in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Center for Urban &
Metropolitan Policy. Washington, D.C.: The Booking
Institution; 2001.
[10] Pendall R. Do land-use controls cause sprawl?
Environment and Planning1999; 26: 555-71.
[11] Angle Sh, Parent J, & Civco D. Urban sprawl metrics: An
analysis of global urban expansion using GIS, in Annual
Conf. Tampa, Florida; 2007:p. 1-3
[12] Kahn M. Does sprawl reduce the black/white housing
consumption gap? Housing Policy Debate 2001; 12(1):
7-25.
[13] Fulton W, Pendall R, Nguyen M, Harrison A. Who
sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the
U.S.Center for urban and metropolitan policy, the
booking institution: Washington, D.C.; 2001.
[14] Couch Ch, Karech J. The Consequences of Urban Sprawl:
A Case Study of Wirral, Merseyside, Liverpool. John
Moores University; 2007:1-21.
[15] Arellano B, Roca J. The urban sprawl: A planetary
growth process? An overview of the USA, Mexico and
Spain, in 6th Int. Conf. Virtual City and Territory, Center
for Land Policy and Valuations, The Universitat
Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech (UPC); 2010:p
5-15.
[16] Lei Q. Socio-economic forces behind sprawl and
compactness in Beijing, in Int. Conf.ofsustainableurban
areas; 2007, Rotterdam: p 1-14.
[17] Brueckner J K, Fansler DA. The economics of urban
sprawl: Theory and evidence on the spatial sizeofcities,
the Review of Economics and Statistics 1983; 65( 3):
479-482.