VITREOUS
SUBSTITUTES
DR PAVANKUMAR NAIK
Anatomy of vitreous1
• Gelatinous structure that
fills the space between lens
and retina
• Non homogenous
• Vitreous cortex
• Vitreous base
• Vitreo retinal interface
• 99% water (vol-4ml)
• Proteins 200 to 1400 mg/ml
• Collagens-II(60-75%) ,IX,VI
300 ug/ml
• GAGs-hyaluronic acid, 65-
400 mg/ml chondroitin
sulfate, heparan sulfate
• Ascorbic acid
• Amino acids
• Fatty acids
• Cells –hyalocytes, fibrocytes,
macrophages
When to substitute?
• > 2 ml vitreous removed
• Major vitreo retinal surgeries
Ideal Vitreous Substitute3
Form
ManipulatableFunction
• VISCOELASTIC
• ALLOW MOVEMENT OF IONS AND ELECTROLYTES
• OPTICALLY CLEAR
• ONE TIME IMPLANTATION
• SELF RENEWABLE
• NON TOXIC, BIOCOMPATIBLE, NON
BIODEGRADABLE
• READILY AVAILABLE, REASONABLE COST AND
STORAGE
Classification2
Classification Example
Aqueous miscible
Low viscosity Balanced salt solution
High viscosity Chondroitin sulfate
Viscoelastic Hyaluronic acid, hydroxymethylcellulose
Aqueous immiscible Gases
Air, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6),
perfluoropropane (C3F8)
Liquids
Lighter than aqueous Silicone oil
Heavier than aqueous Perfluorocarbon liquids, Semiflourinated
alkanes,
Fluorinated silicone oil
Experimental Vitreous substitutes4
a) Polymers
• Hydrogels
• Smart hydrogels
• Thermosetting gels
b) Implants
c) Cell culture
Intra-Ocular
Gases2,3,9
• 1911 by Ohm.
• Rosengren used intravitreal air injection with drainage of
subretinal fluid and diathermy
• 1973, Norton used sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas for a longer
tamponade >air used for difficult retinal detachments,
particularly giant tears.
• Lincoff and associates then developed several perfluorocarbon
gases
Non
Expanding
AIR
XENON
Expanding
SF6
PFC
• SURFACE TENSION
• BUOYANCY
• SOLUBILITY
• BIOCOMPATIBILITY
• Surface tension –
between gas bubbles
and surrounding fluids
critical physical
property
of the gases in retinal
reattachment
• Electrostatic attractive
forces -van der Waals
forces -weaker and
longer range
• Buoyancy-ability to float
• Due to large difference in
specific gravity of fluid
and gas
• superior tear tamponaded
with a large air bubble
• Displaces fluid inferiorly
and away from the tear
• Flattens against the wall
of the eye.
• Buoyancy directs the
effectiveness of the
tamponade, gases -upward
gravitational direction.
• Large bubbles and face-
down positioning are
required to tamponade
inferior retinal breaks
apposition of the gas bubble against the
posterior pole and macula during face
down positioning.
• Solubility of a gas in the aqueous medium :
determining the reabsorption rate of a gas bubble
from the vitreous cavity
• If less soluble than nitrogen, expansion of the bubble
can occur
Biocompatibility
• SF6 and the perfluorocarbon gases have a purity of
99.8%
• Pure gases -chemically nonreactive, colorless,
odorless, and nontoxic
• SF6 may -0.3 ppm of hydrogen fluoride. regarded as
the most toxic contaminant found in SF6.
• When bubble is large enough , covers the back of the lens, a
cataract develops unless the patient is positioned so that a
layer of fluid covers the posterior surface of the lens
• On contact with corneal endothelium -causes increased
inflammation, >SF6 than perfluoropropane
• Persistent corneal edema and retro- corneal membrane -
interference with nutrition of the endothelium rather than to a
specific toxic effect
Gas Dynamics
• Bubble Expansion-gas from surrounding fluid
enter the bubble
• Equilibrium with N2: partial pressures of both
compartments equilibrate: o2/co2 diffuse rapidly, N2
slowly, maximum in 6-8 hours
• Bubble dissolution: as gases diffuse out bubble
decreases in size
Role of Gas bubble
• Bubble larger than the break-surface tension of gas prevents it
from passing through the retinal break
• Gas bubble apposed to the posterior end of break
• Passage of fluid from the vitreous to SRF blocked
• SRF absorbed into RPE and choroid
• Sp gravity of gas lower than water
• Buoyant forces push retina against RPE (max at apex ) 10x >
silicone oil)
• Head position till chorio- retinal adhesion
Advantages:
• When visualisation of retina is difficult-optical window
• Allows fluid gas exchange
• Mechanical barrier-cellular elements & growth factors
“compartmentalisation”
0.3-0.5ml injected
rapidly into the eye to
avoid “fish egg bubble
“formation
Factors affecting dissolution
• Vitreous currents
• Surface area of bubble
• Gas solubility in fluid
• Diffusion coefficient of gas
• Partial pressures
• Ocular blood flow
CHANGES IN THE VITREOUS
• In a non vitrectomised eye: collagen condensed and
compacted behind lens and at optic nerve head
• Hyaluronic acid expressed from vitreous space
• Lamellae - concave margins and rolled edges
• ? Formation of pre retinal membranes complicating
retinal detachment
Choice of Gas
Condition Xenon Air SF6 C2F6 C3F8
RD 2 1 1 2 --
PDR -- 1 1 2 --
RD+mac
hole
-- 2 1 -- 2
GRT -- 1 1 -- 2
PVR -- -- -- -- 1
Trauma -- 2 1 1 2
1-mc used 2-
selected cases
• Inj using 30 g , 13 mm needle
• Injected immediately
• Head position during air fluid exchange
Complications of gas use
• Cataract or corneal opacity
-Face-down or lateral positioning is necessary to
prevent continuous contact of the gas bubble with the
cornea and lens
• Glaucoma
-large bubble
-if the patient remains supine, fluid from the ciliary
body fills the posterior segment & air bubble blocks
fluid egress through the trabecular meshwork
-Medium size -peripheral anterior synechiae with total
angle closure
• Central Retinal Artery Occlusion
-Overfilling of the eye with expansile gas
• Laser treatment -undesirable burns
-Reflections of internal fluid–air and air–fluid surfaces.
-Avoid treatment through a gas–fluid or fluid–gas
interface
-Perpendicular to the interface: intensity of a reflected
beam increases as the angle of incidence decreases. -A
divergent beam should be used
• Endophthalmitis
• Subretinal gas
• New tears -7% to 23% of patients treated with
pneumatic retinopexy
• Dislocated intraocular lens implant
Gas injection into
vitreous base accidentally
A. Donut sign when gas
encircles the lens
posteriorly.
B. B. Sausage sign when
gas partially encircles
the lens posteriorly.
In both cases the gas
bubble is immobile
Perfluoro-
carbons2,10
• Fluorine and carbon atoms - most biologically inert in the eye
• Surface tension of approximately 14 to 16 dynes/cm measured
against air –comparable to silicone oil
• Most remarkable property of the perfluorocarbon liquids is the
specific gravity, which is higher than that of water.
• specific gravities range from 1.7 to 2.03
• Enables the fluid to settle posteriorly, opening folds in the
retina while expressing subretinal fluid anteriorly through pre-
existing retinal breaks
• Perfluorodecalin & perfluorophenanthrene -high transparency
to light in the visible spectrum
• No obstacle to laser photocoagulation
• Perfluorooctylbromide is radiopaque, and it has potential
application as a contrast agent
Biocompatibility
• Inferior corneal endothelial loss with subsequent corneal opacity and
thickening
• Dispersion and droplet formation will develop
• Gial cell proliferation and retinal disorganization -1 month.
• 3 months-preretinal membranes, gliosis, and retinal disorganization
• 6 months, retinal detachments
• Perfluorotributylamine -a “moth-eaten appearance,” - irregularly
shaped defects in the outer segment discs in both the superior and
the inferior retina after 2 days
• Combined use of silicone oil and perfluoropolyether has shown a
tendency to reduce the emulsification PFC
5 main indications:
• Giant retinal tears
• Detachments with complicated PVR
• Traumatic retinal detachments
• Removal of posterior lens fragments and posteriorly dislocated
intraocular lenses
• Macular rotation with a 360-degree retinotomy
• +ROP
• PVR: tamponade effect to
open up funnel detachment
exposing any areas of
residual membranes
• Giant retinal tears:
unfolding and displacement
of SRF and blood
• PPV removal of anterior
vitreous base
• Crystalline lens floated
anteriorly over ONH
• SRF displaced through
the break
• Posterior retina flattened
• Dislocated lens removed
with fragmatome/vit
cutter
DISADVANTAGES
• irreversible cell damage
• Disorganization of retinal
cell growth pattern, loss of
neurites
ADVANTAGES
• Specific gravity of PFCLs -
effective for the intraoperative
repair of complex retinal tears
• Anterior and posterior segment
complications are uncommon
• Low viscosity of PFCLs allow
for tissue manipulation,
injection, and removal
SemiFluorinated
Alkanes2
• Semifluorinated alkanes (SFAs),or partially fluorinated
alkanes (PFAs) or FA -first internal tamponade agents - used
beyond the intraoperative setting
• Low sp. gravity of SFA< PFCLs:so produce less retinal
damage
• Esp used for macular rotation surgery -press down on the
retina less , allowing rotation of the unfolded macular without
mechanical damage
• Using F6H8 and OL62 HV oligomers increases viscosity and
decreases droplet formation
• Ex: Perfluorohexyloctane(F6H8/O68),
Perfluorohexylethane(F6H2/O62)
• Complications: Glaucoma-Superior PI, Cataract ,Droplet
formation & dispersion
Silicone Oil2,10
• Silicone oil chains - helix
with six silicium units per
turn.
• Pure 1,000-centistoke oil -
helix of 63 turns and a
5,000-centistoke oil a
helix of approximately
100 turns
• Interdigitation of the helix
& increasing molecular
weight -viscosity
linear chain coils into a helix,
composed of 6 (Si-O) units per turn.
For a molecular weight of 28,000
(1,000 centistokes), the helix will
have 63 turns in average
• Buoyancy:
• Difference in specific gravity of aqueous humor, vitreous and
hydrophobic polymer accounts for buoyancy
• Force is spread over an area max at apex and decreases to zero
at horizontal interface
• Directs the tamponade of the immiscible silicone oil upward.
Refractive state of the eye
• Higher refractive index compared to vitreous
• Refractive shift depends on lens status
• Phakic eye-oil forms a concave surface behind lens
Acts as a minus lens-making eye hyperopic-8D hyperopia
• Aphakic eye-convex surface as it bulges through pupillary
aperture-plus lens-myopic
Varies with pupillary aperture size-from +12.5 to +5.6D
• Contact lens –to minimise the anisoconia
• IOL-plano posterior surface preferred
Indications for silicone oil
B. Severe Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
• Silicone oil: decreased post op hemorrhage
• Rapid recovery
• Especially in patients with anterior segment
neovascularisation/anterior hyaloid proliferation
• Acts by impending movement of vasoproliferative factors
from posterior segment to anterior segment
• PDR with rhegmatogenous RD involving the macula
C. Macular Hole
• RD due to macular hole
• Idiopathic/Traumatic macular hole
D. Giant Retinal Tears
• Unfolding the tear
• Long term tamponade
E. Chronic uveitis with profound hypotony
F. Infectious retinitis
• RRD in CMV retinitis
• Gancyclovir implants with silicone tamponade
F. Endophthalmitis
• Increase concentration of intravitreal antibioticcs
• Antibacterial properties of silicone oil
• Stabilise atrophic retina
Complications of Silicone
Oil
• Cataract,
• Glaucoma,
• Keratopathy
• Absorption of silicone oil by silicone intraocular lenses,
• Migration of silicone oil into the optic nerve and rarely into the
brain, and
• Emulsification.
• Retinopathy
• Recurrent retinal detachments
Emulsification of Silicone
Oils
• Smaller silicone oil droplets at the interface of oil droplet and intra
ocular fluids
• Factors promoting emulsification:
-Difference in density of two liquids
-Lower viscosity
-Decrease in interfacial tension
-Adsorption of surface active agents
-Ocular saccadic motion
(micro current in and outside the bubble)
1%-1month, 11%-3 months ,85% 6 months, 100%- 1 year 8
Stages of Emulsification
• Choice of IOL: heparin coated PMMA/ regular PMMA
• Silicone oil acts as a foreign substance and not reabsorbed by
the eye
• On removal-retinal redetachment 3-33%
• Indications for removal:
-Glaucoma
-Keratopathy
-reasonable chance that retina will remain attached
(followed by infusion of BSS / Air –fluid exchange)
• Disadvantages
• can pass through retinal
breaks under traction
• Requires optical
adjustments
• tamponade of the inferior
retina is difficult
• Emulsification
• Complications
• Sticky silicone oil
o Advantages
• high surface tension, ease of
removal, low toxicity, and
transparency.
• tamponade effect on the
superior retina
• airplane or high elevation
travel is planned
• post-operative positioning is
difficult
• Combinations
“Double Fill”
• Double fill (DF) is a combination of SO and SFAs,
• light SO support the superior retina ,heavier SFA supports the
inferior retina,
• Tamponade agent and reduces dispersion
“Heavy Silicone Oil”
• SO and a PFA mixed in such a way as to create a homogenous
solution.
• More viscous, more stable
• Complex retinal detachments involving inferior proliferative
vitreoretinopathy
• HSO can be challenging to remove-heavier than water
Experimental
substitutes 3
vitreous molecular
structure
filling function,
to control
elasticity
pressure of the
eye
chemical and
physiological
properties
diffusion of
metabolites
and gases
Perfusion of
drugs
Interact with
intraocular
structures
A Natural Polymers
• Hyaluronic acid (HA) and collagen,
B Hydrogels “swell gels”
• hydrophilic polymers that form a gel network when cross-
linked & swell by absorbing several times their own weight in
water
• molecules as tamponades is coupled with the active action as
drug releasers or exchangers
• investigated include poly(vinyl alcohol),poly(1-vinyl-2-
pyrrolidone), poly(acrylamide), copoly(acrylamide), polyvinyl
alcohol methacrylate, poly(glyceryl methacrylate), poly(2-
hydroxythylacrylate), and poly(methyl-2-acrylamido-2-
methoxyacetate).
C. Transplants & Implants
• Transplant vitreal tissue
• Correctly stored, the vitreous body :maintain its structure
and also its enzymatic properties
• Low inflammatory reaction and interesting surgical
results on 40% of patients.
• Cataract, glaucoma, and more severe adverse events until
ocular atrophy
.
Implants
• artificial capsular bodies,
• silicone rubber elastomer and filled with a saline solution,
• silicone oil, controlled using a valve system
• FCVB
• Good mechanical, optical, and biocompatible properties
• PVA filling model
• X. Lin, J. Ge, Q. Gao et al., “Evaluation of the flexibility,
efficacy,and safety of a foldable capsular vitreous body in the
treatment of severe retinal detachment,” Investigative
Ophthalmology &Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 374–381, 2011.
Future??
A. VITREOUS SUBSTITUTES AS A DRUG DELIVERY
MEDIUM
• A proper vitreous substitute used as a long-term (>3
months) drug delivery system to reduce or eliminate the
need for multiple intra-vitreal injections
• Hydrogels may be a promising biomaterial for fragile
protein drug delivery
B. CELL CULTURE/GENE THERAPY: CAN WE GROW
VITREOUS?
REFERENCES
1. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY VOLUME 56 NUMBER 4 JULY–AUGUST 2011
Vitreous Substitutes: A Comprehensive Review Teri T. Kleinberg, MS, MD,1 Radouil T.
Tzekov, MD, PhD,1 Linda Stein, MS,1 Nathan Ravi, MD, PhD,2 and Shalesh Kaushal,
MD, PhD1
2. Duanes Ophthalmology Volume 6 ,Chapter 54 Vitreous Substitutes MARK E.
HAMMER
3.Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research InternationalVolume 2014,
Article ID 351804, 12 pagesReview Article Vitreous Substitutes: The Present and the
Future Simone Donati,1 Simona Maria Caprani,1 Giulia Airaghi,1 Riccardo
Vinciguerra,1 Luigi Bartalena,2 Francesco Testa,3 Cesare Mariotti,4 Giovanni Porta,5
Francesca Simonelli,3 and Claudio Azzolini1
4.Intraocular gas in vitreoretinal Surgery Shaheeda Mohamed, FRCS, Timothy Y. Y.
Lai, MD, FRCS
5.Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong
Kong, Hong Kong
5.Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
6.Swartz M, Anderson DR: Use of Healon in posterior segment surgery. J Ocul Ther
Surg , January-February, pp 26–28, 1984
7.Poole TA, Sudarsky RD: Suprachoroidal implantation for the treatment of retinal
detachment. Ophthalmology 93:1408, 1986
8.Stenkula S, Ivert L, Gislason I, et al: The use of sodiumhyaluronate (Healon) in the
treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmic Surg 12:435, 1981
9.Stenkula S: Sodium hyaluronate as a vitreous substitute and intravitreal surgical
tool. In Rosen ES (ed): Viscoelastic Materials: Basic Science and Clinical
Applications, pp 157–160. New York, Pergamon Press, 1989
10.Stephen J Ryan –Retina 4 th edition volume 3
11.Lincoff H, Mardirossian J, Lincoff A, et al: Intravitreal longevity of three
perfluorocarbon gases. Arch Ophthalmol 98:1610, 1980
12.Silicone Study Group: Vitrectomy with silicone oil or perfluoropropane gas in eyes
with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Results of a randomized clinical trial: Report
2 Arch Ophthalmol 110:780, 1992

Vitreous substitutes

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Anatomy of vitreous1 •Gelatinous structure that fills the space between lens and retina • Non homogenous • Vitreous cortex • Vitreous base • Vitreo retinal interface
  • 3.
    • 99% water(vol-4ml) • Proteins 200 to 1400 mg/ml • Collagens-II(60-75%) ,IX,VI 300 ug/ml • GAGs-hyaluronic acid, 65- 400 mg/ml chondroitin sulfate, heparan sulfate • Ascorbic acid • Amino acids • Fatty acids • Cells –hyalocytes, fibrocytes, macrophages
  • 4.
    When to substitute? •> 2 ml vitreous removed • Major vitreo retinal surgeries
  • 5.
  • 6.
    • VISCOELASTIC • ALLOWMOVEMENT OF IONS AND ELECTROLYTES • OPTICALLY CLEAR • ONE TIME IMPLANTATION • SELF RENEWABLE • NON TOXIC, BIOCOMPATIBLE, NON BIODEGRADABLE • READILY AVAILABLE, REASONABLE COST AND STORAGE
  • 7.
    Classification2 Classification Example Aqueous miscible Lowviscosity Balanced salt solution High viscosity Chondroitin sulfate Viscoelastic Hyaluronic acid, hydroxymethylcellulose Aqueous immiscible Gases Air, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), perfluoropropane (C3F8) Liquids Lighter than aqueous Silicone oil Heavier than aqueous Perfluorocarbon liquids, Semiflourinated alkanes, Fluorinated silicone oil
  • 8.
    Experimental Vitreous substitutes4 a)Polymers • Hydrogels • Smart hydrogels • Thermosetting gels b) Implants c) Cell culture
  • 9.
  • 10.
    • 1911 byOhm. • Rosengren used intravitreal air injection with drainage of subretinal fluid and diathermy • 1973, Norton used sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas for a longer tamponade >air used for difficult retinal detachments, particularly giant tears. • Lincoff and associates then developed several perfluorocarbon gases
  • 11.
  • 12.
    • SURFACE TENSION •BUOYANCY • SOLUBILITY • BIOCOMPATIBILITY
  • 13.
    • Surface tension– between gas bubbles and surrounding fluids critical physical property of the gases in retinal reattachment • Electrostatic attractive forces -van der Waals forces -weaker and longer range
  • 14.
    • Buoyancy-ability tofloat • Due to large difference in specific gravity of fluid and gas • superior tear tamponaded with a large air bubble • Displaces fluid inferiorly and away from the tear • Flattens against the wall of the eye.
  • 15.
    • Buoyancy directsthe effectiveness of the tamponade, gases -upward gravitational direction. • Large bubbles and face- down positioning are required to tamponade inferior retinal breaks apposition of the gas bubble against the posterior pole and macula during face down positioning.
  • 16.
    • Solubility ofa gas in the aqueous medium : determining the reabsorption rate of a gas bubble from the vitreous cavity • If less soluble than nitrogen, expansion of the bubble can occur
  • 17.
    Biocompatibility • SF6 andthe perfluorocarbon gases have a purity of 99.8% • Pure gases -chemically nonreactive, colorless, odorless, and nontoxic • SF6 may -0.3 ppm of hydrogen fluoride. regarded as the most toxic contaminant found in SF6.
  • 18.
    • When bubbleis large enough , covers the back of the lens, a cataract develops unless the patient is positioned so that a layer of fluid covers the posterior surface of the lens • On contact with corneal endothelium -causes increased inflammation, >SF6 than perfluoropropane • Persistent corneal edema and retro- corneal membrane - interference with nutrition of the endothelium rather than to a specific toxic effect
  • 19.
  • 20.
    • Bubble Expansion-gasfrom surrounding fluid enter the bubble • Equilibrium with N2: partial pressures of both compartments equilibrate: o2/co2 diffuse rapidly, N2 slowly, maximum in 6-8 hours • Bubble dissolution: as gases diffuse out bubble decreases in size
  • 21.
    Role of Gasbubble • Bubble larger than the break-surface tension of gas prevents it from passing through the retinal break • Gas bubble apposed to the posterior end of break • Passage of fluid from the vitreous to SRF blocked • SRF absorbed into RPE and choroid
  • 22.
    • Sp gravityof gas lower than water • Buoyant forces push retina against RPE (max at apex ) 10x > silicone oil) • Head position till chorio- retinal adhesion Advantages: • When visualisation of retina is difficult-optical window • Allows fluid gas exchange • Mechanical barrier-cellular elements & growth factors “compartmentalisation”
  • 23.
    0.3-0.5ml injected rapidly intothe eye to avoid “fish egg bubble “formation
  • 24.
    Factors affecting dissolution •Vitreous currents • Surface area of bubble • Gas solubility in fluid • Diffusion coefficient of gas • Partial pressures • Ocular blood flow
  • 26.
    CHANGES IN THEVITREOUS • In a non vitrectomised eye: collagen condensed and compacted behind lens and at optic nerve head • Hyaluronic acid expressed from vitreous space • Lamellae - concave margins and rolled edges • ? Formation of pre retinal membranes complicating retinal detachment
  • 27.
    Choice of Gas ConditionXenon Air SF6 C2F6 C3F8 RD 2 1 1 2 -- PDR -- 1 1 2 -- RD+mac hole -- 2 1 -- 2 GRT -- 1 1 -- 2 PVR -- -- -- -- 1 Trauma -- 2 1 1 2 1-mc used 2- selected cases
  • 28.
    • Inj using30 g , 13 mm needle • Injected immediately
  • 29.
    • Head positionduring air fluid exchange
  • 30.
    Complications of gasuse • Cataract or corneal opacity -Face-down or lateral positioning is necessary to prevent continuous contact of the gas bubble with the cornea and lens • Glaucoma -large bubble -if the patient remains supine, fluid from the ciliary body fills the posterior segment & air bubble blocks fluid egress through the trabecular meshwork -Medium size -peripheral anterior synechiae with total angle closure
  • 31.
    • Central RetinalArtery Occlusion -Overfilling of the eye with expansile gas • Laser treatment -undesirable burns -Reflections of internal fluid–air and air–fluid surfaces. -Avoid treatment through a gas–fluid or fluid–gas interface -Perpendicular to the interface: intensity of a reflected beam increases as the angle of incidence decreases. -A divergent beam should be used • Endophthalmitis
  • 32.
    • Subretinal gas •New tears -7% to 23% of patients treated with pneumatic retinopexy • Dislocated intraocular lens implant Gas injection into vitreous base accidentally A. Donut sign when gas encircles the lens posteriorly. B. B. Sausage sign when gas partially encircles the lens posteriorly. In both cases the gas bubble is immobile
  • 33.
  • 34.
    • Fluorine andcarbon atoms - most biologically inert in the eye • Surface tension of approximately 14 to 16 dynes/cm measured against air –comparable to silicone oil • Most remarkable property of the perfluorocarbon liquids is the specific gravity, which is higher than that of water. • specific gravities range from 1.7 to 2.03
  • 35.
    • Enables thefluid to settle posteriorly, opening folds in the retina while expressing subretinal fluid anteriorly through pre- existing retinal breaks • Perfluorodecalin & perfluorophenanthrene -high transparency to light in the visible spectrum • No obstacle to laser photocoagulation • Perfluorooctylbromide is radiopaque, and it has potential application as a contrast agent
  • 36.
    Biocompatibility • Inferior cornealendothelial loss with subsequent corneal opacity and thickening • Dispersion and droplet formation will develop • Gial cell proliferation and retinal disorganization -1 month. • 3 months-preretinal membranes, gliosis, and retinal disorganization • 6 months, retinal detachments • Perfluorotributylamine -a “moth-eaten appearance,” - irregularly shaped defects in the outer segment discs in both the superior and the inferior retina after 2 days • Combined use of silicone oil and perfluoropolyether has shown a tendency to reduce the emulsification PFC
  • 37.
    5 main indications: •Giant retinal tears • Detachments with complicated PVR • Traumatic retinal detachments • Removal of posterior lens fragments and posteriorly dislocated intraocular lenses • Macular rotation with a 360-degree retinotomy • +ROP
  • 38.
    • PVR: tamponadeeffect to open up funnel detachment exposing any areas of residual membranes • Giant retinal tears: unfolding and displacement of SRF and blood
  • 39.
    • PPV removalof anterior vitreous base • Crystalline lens floated anteriorly over ONH • SRF displaced through the break • Posterior retina flattened • Dislocated lens removed with fragmatome/vit cutter
  • 40.
    DISADVANTAGES • irreversible celldamage • Disorganization of retinal cell growth pattern, loss of neurites ADVANTAGES • Specific gravity of PFCLs - effective for the intraoperative repair of complex retinal tears • Anterior and posterior segment complications are uncommon • Low viscosity of PFCLs allow for tissue manipulation, injection, and removal
  • 41.
  • 42.
    • Semifluorinated alkanes(SFAs),or partially fluorinated alkanes (PFAs) or FA -first internal tamponade agents - used beyond the intraoperative setting • Low sp. gravity of SFA< PFCLs:so produce less retinal damage • Esp used for macular rotation surgery -press down on the retina less , allowing rotation of the unfolded macular without mechanical damage • Using F6H8 and OL62 HV oligomers increases viscosity and decreases droplet formation • Ex: Perfluorohexyloctane(F6H8/O68), Perfluorohexylethane(F6H2/O62) • Complications: Glaucoma-Superior PI, Cataract ,Droplet formation & dispersion
  • 43.
  • 44.
    • Silicone oilchains - helix with six silicium units per turn. • Pure 1,000-centistoke oil - helix of 63 turns and a 5,000-centistoke oil a helix of approximately 100 turns • Interdigitation of the helix & increasing molecular weight -viscosity linear chain coils into a helix, composed of 6 (Si-O) units per turn. For a molecular weight of 28,000 (1,000 centistokes), the helix will have 63 turns in average
  • 45.
    • Buoyancy: • Differencein specific gravity of aqueous humor, vitreous and hydrophobic polymer accounts for buoyancy • Force is spread over an area max at apex and decreases to zero at horizontal interface • Directs the tamponade of the immiscible silicone oil upward.
  • 46.
    Refractive state ofthe eye • Higher refractive index compared to vitreous • Refractive shift depends on lens status • Phakic eye-oil forms a concave surface behind lens Acts as a minus lens-making eye hyperopic-8D hyperopia • Aphakic eye-convex surface as it bulges through pupillary aperture-plus lens-myopic Varies with pupillary aperture size-from +12.5 to +5.6D • Contact lens –to minimise the anisoconia • IOL-plano posterior surface preferred
  • 48.
  • 49.
    B. Severe ProliferativeDiabetic Retinopathy • Silicone oil: decreased post op hemorrhage • Rapid recovery • Especially in patients with anterior segment neovascularisation/anterior hyaloid proliferation • Acts by impending movement of vasoproliferative factors from posterior segment to anterior segment • PDR with rhegmatogenous RD involving the macula C. Macular Hole • RD due to macular hole • Idiopathic/Traumatic macular hole
  • 50.
    D. Giant RetinalTears • Unfolding the tear • Long term tamponade E. Chronic uveitis with profound hypotony F. Infectious retinitis • RRD in CMV retinitis • Gancyclovir implants with silicone tamponade F. Endophthalmitis • Increase concentration of intravitreal antibioticcs • Antibacterial properties of silicone oil • Stabilise atrophic retina
  • 51.
    Complications of Silicone Oil •Cataract, • Glaucoma, • Keratopathy • Absorption of silicone oil by silicone intraocular lenses, • Migration of silicone oil into the optic nerve and rarely into the brain, and • Emulsification. • Retinopathy • Recurrent retinal detachments
  • 53.
    Emulsification of Silicone Oils •Smaller silicone oil droplets at the interface of oil droplet and intra ocular fluids • Factors promoting emulsification: -Difference in density of two liquids -Lower viscosity -Decrease in interfacial tension -Adsorption of surface active agents -Ocular saccadic motion (micro current in and outside the bubble) 1%-1month, 11%-3 months ,85% 6 months, 100%- 1 year 8
  • 54.
  • 55.
    • Choice ofIOL: heparin coated PMMA/ regular PMMA • Silicone oil acts as a foreign substance and not reabsorbed by the eye • On removal-retinal redetachment 3-33% • Indications for removal: -Glaucoma -Keratopathy -reasonable chance that retina will remain attached (followed by infusion of BSS / Air –fluid exchange)
  • 57.
    • Disadvantages • canpass through retinal breaks under traction • Requires optical adjustments • tamponade of the inferior retina is difficult • Emulsification • Complications • Sticky silicone oil o Advantages • high surface tension, ease of removal, low toxicity, and transparency. • tamponade effect on the superior retina • airplane or high elevation travel is planned • post-operative positioning is difficult
  • 58.
    • Combinations “Double Fill” •Double fill (DF) is a combination of SO and SFAs, • light SO support the superior retina ,heavier SFA supports the inferior retina, • Tamponade agent and reduces dispersion “Heavy Silicone Oil” • SO and a PFA mixed in such a way as to create a homogenous solution. • More viscous, more stable • Complex retinal detachments involving inferior proliferative vitreoretinopathy • HSO can be challenging to remove-heavier than water
  • 59.
  • 60.
    vitreous molecular structure filling function, tocontrol elasticity pressure of the eye chemical and physiological properties diffusion of metabolites and gases Perfusion of drugs Interact with intraocular structures
  • 61.
    A Natural Polymers •Hyaluronic acid (HA) and collagen, B Hydrogels “swell gels” • hydrophilic polymers that form a gel network when cross- linked & swell by absorbing several times their own weight in water • molecules as tamponades is coupled with the active action as drug releasers or exchangers
  • 62.
    • investigated includepoly(vinyl alcohol),poly(1-vinyl-2- pyrrolidone), poly(acrylamide), copoly(acrylamide), polyvinyl alcohol methacrylate, poly(glyceryl methacrylate), poly(2- hydroxythylacrylate), and poly(methyl-2-acrylamido-2- methoxyacetate).
  • 63.
    C. Transplants &Implants • Transplant vitreal tissue • Correctly stored, the vitreous body :maintain its structure and also its enzymatic properties • Low inflammatory reaction and interesting surgical results on 40% of patients. • Cataract, glaucoma, and more severe adverse events until ocular atrophy .
  • 64.
    Implants • artificial capsularbodies, • silicone rubber elastomer and filled with a saline solution, • silicone oil, controlled using a valve system • FCVB • Good mechanical, optical, and biocompatible properties • PVA filling model • X. Lin, J. Ge, Q. Gao et al., “Evaluation of the flexibility, efficacy,and safety of a foldable capsular vitreous body in the treatment of severe retinal detachment,” Investigative Ophthalmology &Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 374–381, 2011.
  • 65.
    Future?? A. VITREOUS SUBSTITUTESAS A DRUG DELIVERY MEDIUM • A proper vitreous substitute used as a long-term (>3 months) drug delivery system to reduce or eliminate the need for multiple intra-vitreal injections • Hydrogels may be a promising biomaterial for fragile protein drug delivery B. CELL CULTURE/GENE THERAPY: CAN WE GROW VITREOUS?
  • 66.
    REFERENCES 1. SURVEY OFOPHTHALMOLOGY VOLUME 56 NUMBER 4 JULY–AUGUST 2011 Vitreous Substitutes: A Comprehensive Review Teri T. Kleinberg, MS, MD,1 Radouil T. Tzekov, MD, PhD,1 Linda Stein, MS,1 Nathan Ravi, MD, PhD,2 and Shalesh Kaushal, MD, PhD1 2. Duanes Ophthalmology Volume 6 ,Chapter 54 Vitreous Substitutes MARK E. HAMMER 3.Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research InternationalVolume 2014, Article ID 351804, 12 pagesReview Article Vitreous Substitutes: The Present and the Future Simone Donati,1 Simona Maria Caprani,1 Giulia Airaghi,1 Riccardo Vinciguerra,1 Luigi Bartalena,2 Francesco Testa,3 Cesare Mariotti,4 Giovanni Porta,5 Francesca Simonelli,3 and Claudio Azzolini1 4.Intraocular gas in vitreoretinal Surgery Shaheeda Mohamed, FRCS, Timothy Y. Y. Lai, MD, FRCS 5.Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • 67.
    5.Department of Ophthalmology& Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 6.Swartz M, Anderson DR: Use of Healon in posterior segment surgery. J Ocul Ther Surg , January-February, pp 26–28, 1984 7.Poole TA, Sudarsky RD: Suprachoroidal implantation for the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 93:1408, 1986 8.Stenkula S, Ivert L, Gislason I, et al: The use of sodiumhyaluronate (Healon) in the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmic Surg 12:435, 1981 9.Stenkula S: Sodium hyaluronate as a vitreous substitute and intravitreal surgical tool. In Rosen ES (ed): Viscoelastic Materials: Basic Science and Clinical Applications, pp 157–160. New York, Pergamon Press, 1989
  • 68.
    10.Stephen J Ryan–Retina 4 th edition volume 3 11.Lincoff H, Mardirossian J, Lincoff A, et al: Intravitreal longevity of three perfluorocarbon gases. Arch Ophthalmol 98:1610, 1980 12.Silicone Study Group: Vitrectomy with silicone oil or perfluoropropane gas in eyes with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Results of a randomized clinical trial: Report 2 Arch Ophthalmol 110:780, 1992