Trifascicular Block

   Candice Reyes
     Cardiology
    July 17, 2009
Subjective
• 57 y/o male transferred to RLAH for eval
  and treatment of R 3rd met plantar ulcer
  and gangrene of R 3rd toe
• Pt has no h/o cardiac dz, he has no
  cardiac sx
• PMHx: DM x2yrs w/o tx
Objective
• Vitals: BP 128/75 P 86 T99 O2Sat 99% Wt
  95.6 F.S. 286
• CV: decr heart tones w/RRR S1S2 w/o
  murmur
• Resp: LCTA B/L
• Extremities: RLE has erythema and 2+
  pitting edema
EKG Discussion
• Prolongation of PR interval – 1st Degree
  AV Block
• RBBB
• LAFB
• Findings suggest trifascicular block
Trifascicular Block
• Conduction blocks in all 3 fascicles
  – Can be permanent or transient
• Criteria:
  – 1) RBB and LASF w/1st degree AV block
  – 2) RBB and LPIF w/1st degree AV block
  – 3) LBB w/1st degree AV block or
  – 4) Alternating RBBB and LBBB
Trifascicular Block
• Trifascicular, along w/bifascicular, blocks
  indicate advanced heart dz
• BUT long-term follow-up studies of
  ambulatory patients indicate that risk of
  sudden progression to complete heart
  block and sudden death d/t ventricular
  asystole is not great

Bolton Edmund, "Chapter 28. Disturbances of Cardiac Rhythm and Conduction" (Chapter). Tintinalli
    JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS, Ma OJ, Cline DM: Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine: A
    Comprehensive Study Guide, 6e: http://www.accessmedicine.com/content.aspx?aID=587596.
Assessment and Plan
• Dr. Quesada’s Assessment and Plan: These
  findings suggest a trifascicular block.
  Progression of chronic bifasicular or trifascicular
  block to complete heart block is infrequent. This
  pt is asx and was very active prior to
  hospitalization
• Per guidelines, the pt has intermediate to high
  clinical predictors (DM asx trifascicular block)
  and is scheduled for a low risk surgical
  procedure

Trifascicular Block Presentation

  • 1.
    Trifascicular Block Candice Reyes Cardiology July 17, 2009
  • 2.
    Subjective • 57 y/omale transferred to RLAH for eval and treatment of R 3rd met plantar ulcer and gangrene of R 3rd toe • Pt has no h/o cardiac dz, he has no cardiac sx • PMHx: DM x2yrs w/o tx
  • 3.
    Objective • Vitals: BP128/75 P 86 T99 O2Sat 99% Wt 95.6 F.S. 286 • CV: decr heart tones w/RRR S1S2 w/o murmur • Resp: LCTA B/L • Extremities: RLE has erythema and 2+ pitting edema
  • 5.
    EKG Discussion • Prolongationof PR interval – 1st Degree AV Block • RBBB • LAFB • Findings suggest trifascicular block
  • 6.
    Trifascicular Block • Conductionblocks in all 3 fascicles – Can be permanent or transient • Criteria: – 1) RBB and LASF w/1st degree AV block – 2) RBB and LPIF w/1st degree AV block – 3) LBB w/1st degree AV block or – 4) Alternating RBBB and LBBB
  • 7.
    Trifascicular Block • Trifascicular,along w/bifascicular, blocks indicate advanced heart dz • BUT long-term follow-up studies of ambulatory patients indicate that risk of sudden progression to complete heart block and sudden death d/t ventricular asystole is not great Bolton Edmund, "Chapter 28. Disturbances of Cardiac Rhythm and Conduction" (Chapter). Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS, Ma OJ, Cline DM: Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, 6e: http://www.accessmedicine.com/content.aspx?aID=587596.
  • 8.
    Assessment and Plan •Dr. Quesada’s Assessment and Plan: These findings suggest a trifascicular block. Progression of chronic bifasicular or trifascicular block to complete heart block is infrequent. This pt is asx and was very active prior to hospitalization • Per guidelines, the pt has intermediate to high clinical predictors (DM asx trifascicular block) and is scheduled for a low risk surgical procedure