Management of LLD and
Bone gaps
Dr Bassey, A. E.
Supervised by Dr T. Sough
Limb Length Discrepancy
• Introduction
• Aetiology
• Classification
• Problems
• Assessment
• Treatment
• Complications
• Current trends
Introduction
• Limb length discrepancy refers to any noticeable inequality in limb
length
• Associated with cosmetic and functional problems which significantly
limit quality of life
• Proper management is necessary for best outcomes
Aetiology
• Congenital
- PFFD
- Tibial hemimelia
• Acquired
- malunited fracture
- physeal injuries
- Paralytic dxs – Polio, CP
Classification
• Congenital v Acquired
• Static v Progressive
Problems
• Cosmetic
• Functional – increased energy expenditure
• Scoliosis/back pain
• Hip/Knee/Ankle arthrosis
Assessment
• History
• Congenital/acquired
• Anatomical/functional
• Age of presentation
• Associated deformities
• Examination
• Real/Apparent length
• Spine exam
Assessment
• Imaging
• Orthoradiograph
• CT Scanogram
• Prediction of LLD at maturity
Treatment
• < or = 2cm LLD do not need Rx except symptomatic
• Techniques
• Shoe raise/lift
• Shorten long leg
• Slow growth of long leg
• Lengthen short leg
• Amputation and prosthesis
Treatment
Shoe raise/lift
• LLD <5cm
• Unsafe for LLD >5cm
Shorten long leg
• Acute shortening
• Deformity < or =7cm
Slow growth of long leg
• Epiphyseodysis
• Timing and technique are crucial to success
Lengthen short leg
• Distraction osteogenesis
Amputation and prosthesis
• A viable option in patients with LLD >15cm
Complications
• Incomplete arrest, Angular deformities
• Regenerate fracture, docking site nonunion
Current trends
• PRECICE System
Management of Bone gaps
• Introduction
• Aetiology
• Assessment
• Treatment
• Complications
• Current trends
Introduction
• Bone gaps refer to any defect in length or circumference of bone
• Critical bone gap
• Causes significant disability. Care is often complex and costly
• Treatment methods are prone to complications. Therefore, high
degrees of knowledge, decision-making and technical skills are
required
Aetiology
• Congenital – CPT, diaphyseal dysplasia
• Acquired – Trauma, Infection, nonunion, post tumour excision
Assessment
• History
• Hx of Aetiology
• Duration
• Previous Rx
• Tobacco use
• Medical comorbities e.g. DM
• Examination
• General condition (esp nutritional state)
• Soft tissue envelope
• Perfusion
• Any LLD?
• Any deformity?
Investigations
• Xrays - gap size, surrounding bone, aetiology.
• FBC, ESR, genotype, FBS, U&E, Swab m/c/s.
• Doppler USS.
Treatment
• Multidisciplinary approach, highly-individualized
• Adequate counselling with proper management of expectations
• Patient optimization
• Nutrition
• Stop tobacco
• Correct Hb conc
• Correct glycaemia
• Consider metabolic or endocrine derangements
Treatment
• Treatment of soft tissue defects
• Utmost importance
• Plastic surgeon involvement from outset
• Simplest technique to achieve cover should be used
• Outcomes less predictable than bone recon
Treatment of bone defect
Management method Size of
defect
Advantages Disadvantages
Autologous graft <5cm 1. Single stage
2. No dx/no rejection
3. Has 3 elements of graft
1. Donor site morbidity
2. Limited quantity
Induced membrane technique 5-24cm 1. recon time independent of defect length
2. Low cost
1. Donor site morbidity
2. 2-stage
3. Limited ‘assistance’ by allograft
Distraction osteogenesis 5-10cm 1. Can be used with poor soft tissue
2. Multiple osteotomie reduce recon time
1. High rate of complications
2. Frame/implants are expensive
Acute shortening 1-3cm 1. Simple, fast
2. Allow early soft tissue closure
3. Low cost
1. Limited defect length
Vascularised fib graft 10-20cm 1. Shorter recon time
2. Lowcost
1. Requires microvascular
2. Donor site morbidity
Amputation 1. Short Rx time than salvage
2. Some studies show equivalent outcomes
1. Permanent limb loss
2. Lifetime prosthetic cost
Complications
• Complications of management methods
Current trends
• VFG left behind
• Introduction of graft substitutes with osteoprogenitor cells and
osteoinductive cytokines
Conclusion
• LLD and Bone gaps are still common problems in our environment,
and will likely remain so for as long as poverty, ignorance and
traditional bone setters remain
• There is some overlap f techniques in their management
• Best outcomes are achieved when such cases are managed by
surgeons specializing in these techniques
References

Management of LLD and bone gaps

  • 1.
    Management of LLDand Bone gaps Dr Bassey, A. E. Supervised by Dr T. Sough
  • 2.
    Limb Length Discrepancy •Introduction • Aetiology • Classification • Problems • Assessment • Treatment • Complications • Current trends
  • 3.
    Introduction • Limb lengthdiscrepancy refers to any noticeable inequality in limb length • Associated with cosmetic and functional problems which significantly limit quality of life • Proper management is necessary for best outcomes
  • 4.
    Aetiology • Congenital - PFFD -Tibial hemimelia • Acquired - malunited fracture - physeal injuries - Paralytic dxs – Polio, CP
  • 5.
    Classification • Congenital vAcquired • Static v Progressive
  • 6.
    Problems • Cosmetic • Functional– increased energy expenditure • Scoliosis/back pain • Hip/Knee/Ankle arthrosis
  • 7.
    Assessment • History • Congenital/acquired •Anatomical/functional • Age of presentation • Associated deformities • Examination • Real/Apparent length • Spine exam
  • 8.
    Assessment • Imaging • Orthoradiograph •CT Scanogram • Prediction of LLD at maturity
  • 9.
    Treatment • < or= 2cm LLD do not need Rx except symptomatic • Techniques • Shoe raise/lift • Shorten long leg • Slow growth of long leg • Lengthen short leg • Amputation and prosthesis
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Shoe raise/lift • LLD<5cm • Unsafe for LLD >5cm
  • 12.
    Shorten long leg •Acute shortening • Deformity < or =7cm
  • 13.
    Slow growth oflong leg • Epiphyseodysis • Timing and technique are crucial to success
  • 14.
    Lengthen short leg •Distraction osteogenesis
  • 15.
    Amputation and prosthesis •A viable option in patients with LLD >15cm
  • 16.
    Complications • Incomplete arrest,Angular deformities • Regenerate fracture, docking site nonunion
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Management of Bonegaps • Introduction • Aetiology • Assessment • Treatment • Complications • Current trends
  • 19.
    Introduction • Bone gapsrefer to any defect in length or circumference of bone • Critical bone gap • Causes significant disability. Care is often complex and costly • Treatment methods are prone to complications. Therefore, high degrees of knowledge, decision-making and technical skills are required
  • 20.
    Aetiology • Congenital –CPT, diaphyseal dysplasia • Acquired – Trauma, Infection, nonunion, post tumour excision
  • 21.
    Assessment • History • Hxof Aetiology • Duration • Previous Rx • Tobacco use • Medical comorbities e.g. DM • Examination • General condition (esp nutritional state) • Soft tissue envelope • Perfusion • Any LLD? • Any deformity?
  • 22.
    Investigations • Xrays -gap size, surrounding bone, aetiology. • FBC, ESR, genotype, FBS, U&E, Swab m/c/s. • Doppler USS.
  • 23.
    Treatment • Multidisciplinary approach,highly-individualized • Adequate counselling with proper management of expectations • Patient optimization • Nutrition • Stop tobacco • Correct Hb conc • Correct glycaemia • Consider metabolic or endocrine derangements
  • 24.
    Treatment • Treatment ofsoft tissue defects • Utmost importance • Plastic surgeon involvement from outset • Simplest technique to achieve cover should be used • Outcomes less predictable than bone recon
  • 25.
    Treatment of bonedefect Management method Size of defect Advantages Disadvantages Autologous graft <5cm 1. Single stage 2. No dx/no rejection 3. Has 3 elements of graft 1. Donor site morbidity 2. Limited quantity Induced membrane technique 5-24cm 1. recon time independent of defect length 2. Low cost 1. Donor site morbidity 2. 2-stage 3. Limited ‘assistance’ by allograft Distraction osteogenesis 5-10cm 1. Can be used with poor soft tissue 2. Multiple osteotomie reduce recon time 1. High rate of complications 2. Frame/implants are expensive Acute shortening 1-3cm 1. Simple, fast 2. Allow early soft tissue closure 3. Low cost 1. Limited defect length Vascularised fib graft 10-20cm 1. Shorter recon time 2. Lowcost 1. Requires microvascular 2. Donor site morbidity Amputation 1. Short Rx time than salvage 2. Some studies show equivalent outcomes 1. Permanent limb loss 2. Lifetime prosthetic cost
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Current trends • VFGleft behind • Introduction of graft substitutes with osteoprogenitor cells and osteoinductive cytokines
  • 30.
    Conclusion • LLD andBone gaps are still common problems in our environment, and will likely remain so for as long as poverty, ignorance and traditional bone setters remain • There is some overlap f techniques in their management • Best outcomes are achieved when such cases are managed by surgeons specializing in these techniques
  • 31.