This document contains a performance review of Christine D. David by Pepito C. Celestino for her work as a Teacher I from May 2015 to March 2016. It evaluates her performance on 5 key result areas (KRAs) based on objectives, performance indicators, actual results, and ratings. Each KRA is assigned a weight and she receives a score for each based on her level of accomplishment of the objectives as Outstanding, Very Satisfactory, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, or Poor. Her overall rating is calculated by multiplying her ratings by the assigned weights for each KRA.

1. Name of Employee: CHRISTINE D. DAVID Name of Rater: PEPITO C. CELESTINO
Position: TEACHER I Position: HT III
ReviewPeriod: MAY 2015 – MARCH 2016 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT per
KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelessness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATINGS SCORE
I – TEACHING –
LEARNING PROCESS
1. Prepare dailylessonlogsof
activitiesincludingappropriate
and adequate andupdated
instructional materials.
2. Facilitate learninginsecondary
schoolsthroughfunctional daily
logsand innovative teaching
strategies.
June,
2015-
March
2016
10%
10%
 5 – Outstanding
Attained130% and above of
the desiredlearning
competencies.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Attained115 - 129% of the
desiredlearningcompetencies
 3 – Satisfactory
Attained100 – 114% of the
desiredlearningcompetencies.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Attained51 – 99% of the
desiredlearningcompetencies.
 1 – Poor
50% andbelowof the desired
learningcompetencies.
 5 – Outstanding
The goal reflectedarange of
studentlearnerneeds.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
The teacherexplainedthe
importance of the goal and its
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

2. 3. Initiate disciplineof students
includingclassroomrules,
guidelinesandindividual and
grouptasks.
10%
appropriatenesstostudents
 3 – Satisfactory
The teacherclearly
communicatedafocusfor
studentlearning
 2 – Unsatisfactory
The teacherdidnot have a
clearfocus forstudentlearning
 1 – Poor
The objective isinappropriate
for students.
 5 – Outstanding
Learnerswere 130% and above
guidedinthe observationof
classroomrulesandguidelines
as evidencedbydescriptive
ratingin the reportcard.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Learnerswere 115 – 129%
guidedinthe observationof
classroomrulesandguidelines
as evidencedbydescriptive
ratingin the reportcard.
 3- Satisfactory
Learnerswere 100 – 114%
guidedinthe observationof
classroomrulesandguidelines
as evidencedbydescriptive
ratingin the reportcard.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Learnerswere 51 – 99% guided
inthe observationof classroom
rulesandguidelinesas
evidencedbydescriptive rating
inthe reportcard.

3. II – STUDENTS
DEVELOPMENT 1.Monitor,evaluate andmaintain
students’ progress
2. Maintainupdatedstudents’
school records.
June,
2015-
March
2016
10%
10%
 1 – Poor
Learnerswere notguidedin
the observationof classroom
rulesandguidelines as
evidencedbydescriptive rating
inthe reportcard.
 5 – Outstanding
Classrecord reflectedthe bases
of 130% andabove of learners’
ratingsinall classes/subject
areas handled.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Classrecord reflectedthe bases
of 115 – 129% learners’ratings
inall classes/subjectareas
handled.
 3-Satisfactory
Classrecord reflectedthe bases
of 100-114% of learners’
ratingsinall classes/subject
areas handled.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Classrecord reflectedthe bases
of 51 – 99% of learners’ratings
inall classes/subjectareas
handled.
 1 – Poor
Classrecord reflectedthe bases
of 50% and belowof learners’
ratingsinall classes/subject
areas handled.
 5 – Outstanding
Students’ school recordswere
130% and above systematically

4. 3. AdoptK-12 througha
meaningful innovativeand
holisticdevelopment.
5%
carriedout.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Students’ school recordswere
115 – 129% systematically
carriedout.
 3-Satisfactory
Students’ school recordswere
100 – 114% systematically
carriedout.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Students’ school recordswere
51 – 99% systematicallycarried
out.
 1 – Poor
Students’ school recordswere
not systematicallycarriedout.
 5 – Outstanding
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited130% and
above interactionfromaclass.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited115-129%
interactionfromaclass.
 3 – Satisfactory
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited100-114%
interactionfromaclass.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited51-99%
interactionfromaclass.
 1 – Poor
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited50%and

5. III – PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
1. Enhance the instructional
competence forthe successful
implementationof the K-12
program.
2. Participatedinactivitiessuch
as teachersassociation,etc.
June,
2015-
March
2016
5%
5%
belowinteractionfromaclass.
 5 – Outstanding
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited130% and
above interactionfromaclass.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited115-129%
interactionfromaclass.
 3 – Satisfactory
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited100-114%
interactionfromaclass.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited51-99%
interactionfromaclass.
 1 – Poor
Teachingmethodsand
strategieselicited50%and
belowinteractionfromaclass.
 5 – Outstanding
Initiatedatleast2 co-
curricular/school activitieswith
documentedresults.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Initiatedandparticipatedinco-
curricular/school activitieswith
documentedresults.
 3 – Satisfactory
Participatedinmostco-
curricular/school activitieswith

6. IV – RECORDS
MANAGEMENT
3. Increase professional
competencies.
Prepare/file school recordssuch
as:
 lessonlogs
 classrecords
 gradingsheet
 attendance sheets
 accomplishmentrepots
June,
2015-
March
2016
5%
10%
documentedresults.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Participationonlywithout
documentedresults.
 1 – Poor
No participationinschool
activities.
 5 – Outstanding
Initiatedatleast2 co-
curricular/school activitieswith
documentedresults.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Initiatedandparticipatedinco-
curricular/school activitieswith
documentedresults.
 3 – Satisfactory
Participatedinmostco-
curricular/school activitieswith
documentedresults.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Participationonlywithout
documentedresults.
 1 – Poor
No participationinschool
activities.
 5 – Outstanding
Performsandrepresents
extraordinarylevel of
achievement
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Performance exceeded
expectations

7. V – COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
1. Organize andmaintain
functional HomeroomPTA.
10%
 3 – Satisfactory
Performance met
expectations
 2 –Unsatisfactory
Performance failedtomeet
expectations
 5 – Poor
Performance was
consistentlybelow
expectations
 5 – Outstanding
130% and above
accomplishmentwithset
agreementsmet.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
115 – 129% plannedmeetings
conductedproducingonlyset
agreementsandpartial
accomplishmentsof these.
 3 – Satisfactory
100-114% of plannedmeetings
conductedproducingsetof
agreements.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
51 – 99% of plannedmeetings
conductedproducingminimal
results.
 1 – Poor
50% andbelowof planned
meetingswithnoresults.

8. 2. Conduct periodicPTA meeting.
3. Supportdifferentactivitiesof
school.
5%
5%
 5 – Outstanding
130% and above
accomplishmentwithset
agreementsmet.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
115 – 129% plannedmeetings
conductedproducingonlyset
agreementsandpartial
accomplishmentsof these.
 3 – Satisfactory
100-114% of plannedmeetings
conductedproducingsetof
agreements.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
51 – 99% of plannedmeetings
conductedproducingminimal
results.
 1 – Poor
50% andbelowof planned
meetingswithnoresults.
 5 – Outstanding
Initiatedandparticipatedat
least2 co-curricular/school
activitieswithdocumented
results.
 4 – Very Satisfactory
Initiatedandparticipatedinco-
curricular/school activitieswith
documentedresults.
 3 – Satisfactory
Participatedinmostco-
curricular/school activitieswith
documentedresults.
 2 – Unsatisfactory
Participationonlywithout

9. documentedresults.
 1 – Poor
No participationinschool
activities.
OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLI -
SHMENTS
 To get the score,the rating is multipliedbythe weightassigned
_______________________________________________ _________________________________________
Rater Ratee