This document contains an individual performance commitment and review form for Hazrat Olayinka Kayode Mico Ameen, a secondary school teacher, being rated by their principal Rolito Mendeja Inojosa. The form outlines 10 key result areas (KRAs) with objectives and performance indicators to be accomplished within the school year. It will be used to evaluate the teacher's performance and determine an overall rating at the end of the review period.

1. Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form .
Name of Employee: HAZRAT OLAYINKA KAYODE MICO AMEEN Name of Rater: ROLITO MENDEJA INOJOSA, Ph. D.
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED LUCENA CITY
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING SCORE
1. TEACHING-
LEARNING
PROCESS
1. Prepare an updated lesson plan in my
handled subject; 161 mathematics
lesson intended for Lirio, Waling-waling
and Kalachuchi; 200 for SPED (ID); 40
Mathematics Lesson Plans for G7
OHSP and G9 OHSP within the current
school year focusing on the
competencies intended for each level.
2. Monitor my learners’ attendance; 161
days intended for Lirio, Waling-waling
and Kalachuchi; 200 days for SPED
(ID); 40 days for G7 OHSP and G9
OHSP to ensure learners presence
during the time of my subject
throughout the current school year.
3. Execute a total of 3 approved
remediation program from 2nd to 4th
quarter to address mathematics
learning gaps to 100% of the learners
who got a Beginning level from the
previous quarter of the current school
year.
JUNE
2014 –
MARCH
2015
JUNE
2014 –
MARCH
2015
AUGUST
2014 –
MARCH
2015
35%
5 – Prepared 209.3 and above lesson plans intended for
Lirio, Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 260 and above lesson
plans for SPED ID; 52 and above lesson plan for G7 OHSP
and G9 OHSP.
4 – Prepared 185.15 – 209.29 lesson plans intended for Lirio,
Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 230-259.99 lesson plans
for SPED ID; 46-51.99 lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9
OHSP.
3 – Prepared 161-185.14 lesson plans intended for Lirio,
Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 200-229 lesson plans for
SPED ID; 40-45.9 lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
2 – Prepared 80.6-160 lesson plans intended for Lirio,
Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 101-199 lesson plans for
SPED ID; 20.4-39.9 lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
1 – Prepared 0 – 80.5 lesson plans intended for Lirio, Waling-
waling and Kalachuchi; 0 – 100 lesson plans for SPED ID; 0
– 20 lesson plan for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
5 – Monitored 209.3 days and above intended for Lirio,
Waling-waling and Kalachuchi; 260 days and above for
SPED ID; 52 days and above for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
4 – Monitored 185.15 – 207.69 day for Lirio, Waling-waling
and Kalachuchi; 230-258 days for SPED ID; 46-51.6 days
for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
3 – Monitored 161-183.54 days for Lirio, Waling-waling and
Kalachuchi; 200-228 days for SPED ID; 40-45.6 days for G7
OHSP and G9 OHSP.
2 – Monitored 82.11-159.39 days for Lirio, Waling-waling
and Kalachuchi; 102-198 days for SPED ID; 20.4-39.6 days
for G7 OHSP and G9 OHSP.
1 – Monitored 0 – 80.5 days for Lirio, Waling-waling and
Kalachuchi; 0 – 100 days for SPED ID; 0 – 20 days for G7
OHSP and G9 OHSP.
5 – Executed 3.9 or more remediation program throughout
the year.
4 – Executed 3.45-3.89 remediation programs throughout
the year.
3 – Executed 3.0-3.44 remediation programs throughout the
year.
2 – Executed 1.51-2.99 remediation programs throughout
the year.
1 – Executed 0-1.5 remediation program throughout the
year.

2. Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form .
Name of Employee: HAZRAT OLAYINKA KAYODE MICO AMEEN Name of Rater: ROLITO MENDEJA INOJOSA, Ph. D.
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED LUCENA CITY
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING SCORE
2. STUDENT OUTCOMES
3. COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
4. Attain a 100% passing rate for my
students making them acquire a final
rating between 75% and 80% in my
subject at the end of the current school
year.
5. Help the school lessen the drop-out
rate by 2% within the school year by
encouraging the regular 4th year
advisers transfer their SARDO’s to
OHSP.
6. Train/Coach 2 contestant of any
contest to represent the school in the
division level within the current school
year.
7. Create a 100% profile of OHSP
enrolees on the Beginning of the
School Year (BoSY) from Grade 7 to
4th year of the current school year.
MARCH
2015
JUNE
2014 –
MARCH
2015
JUNE
2014 –
MARCH
2015
JUNE
2014 –
MARCH
2015
JUNE
35%
20%
5 – 130% and above of my students attain either developing,
approaching proficiency, proficient or advance level on their
final rating.
4 – 115-129% of my students attain either developing,
approaching proficiency, proficient or advance level on their
final rating.
3 – 100-114% of my students attain developing proficiency level
on their final rating.
2 – 51-99% of my students attain developing proficiency level on
their final rating.
1 – 0-50% of my students attains developing proficiency level on
their final rating.
5 – The school dropout rate change by 2.6% and above from the
past school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
4 – The school dropout rate change by 2.3-2.59% from the past
school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
3 – The school dropout rate change by 2.0-2.29% from the past
school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
2 – The school dropout rate change by 1.02-1.99% from the past
school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
1 – The school dropout rate change by 0-1.0% from the past
school year’s data at the end of the current school year.
5 – Coach/train 2.6 or more contestants to represent the school
any contest in the division level within the current school year.
4 – Coach/train 2.3-2.59 contestants to represent the school any
contest in the division level within the current school year.
3 – Coach/train 2.0-2.29 contestant to represent the school any
contest in the division level within the current school year.
2 – Coach/train 1.01-1.99 contestant to represent the school any
contest in the division level within the current school year.
1 – Coach/train 0-1.0 contestant to represent the school any
contest in the division level within the current school year.
5 – Created only 130% and above profile for OHSP learners
enrolees within the current school year.
4 – Created only 115 – 129% profile for OHSP learners’ enrolees
within the current school year.
3 – Created only 100 – 114% profile for OHSP learners’ enrolees
within the current school year.
2 – Created only 51 – 99% profile for OHSP learners BoSY enrolees
within the current school year.
1 – Created only 0 – 50% profile for OHSP learners BoSY enrolees
within the current school year.
5 – Conducted a total of 2.6 and above parent meeting /
conference within the current school year.

3. Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form .
Name of Employee: HAZRAT OLAYINKA KAYODE MICO AMEEN Name of Rater: ROLITO MENDEJA INOJOSA, Ph. D.
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED LUCENA CITY
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING SCORE
4. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
& DEVELOPMENT
8. Conduct 1 regular parent-meetings /
conference semi-annually to give
report on the performance of their
learners within the current school year
9. Invites 50% of learners’
parent/guardian in my class
advisorship (OHSP) needing academic
monitoring/follow-up due to 2
absenteeism per month.
10. Conducts 2 approved school-
based instructional supports for the K
to 12 Curriculum to be shared to my
fellow teachers on the current school
year through a faculty development
session.
2014 –
MARCH
2015
JUNE
2014 –
MARCH
2015
JUNE
2014 –
MARCH
2015
10%
4 – Conducted a total of 2.3-2.59 parent meeting / conference
within the current school year.
3 – Conducted a total of 2.0-2.29 parent meeting / conference
within the current school year.
2 – Conducted a total of 1.01-1.99 parent meeting / conference
within the current school year.
1 – Conducted a total of 0-1 parent meeting / conference within
the current school year.
5 – Invited 65% and above of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to
school within the current school year.
4 – Invited 57.5-64.99% of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to
school within the current school year.
3 – Invited 50-57% of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to school
within the current school year.
2 – Invited 25.01-49.99% of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to
school within the current school year.
1 – Invited 0-25% of 4th year OHSP parent / guardian to school
within the current school year.
5 – Conducted 2.6 approved school-based instructional supports
for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
4 – Conducted 2.3-2.59 approved school-based instructional
supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
3 – Conducted 2.0-2.29 approved school-based instructional
supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
2 – Conducted 1.01-1.99 approved school-based instructional
supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
1 – Conducted 0-1.0 approved school-based instructional
supports for K-12 curriculum within the current school year.
OVERALL RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ROLITO M. INOJOSA, Ph. D. HAZRAT OLAYINKA KAYODE M. AMEEN
Rater Ratee
DEPED RPMS FORM – TEACHERS | 3