The document outlines the performance evaluation of a teacher, detailing key result areas and objectives achieved from July 2015 to March 2016, including monitoring student attendance and academic performance in various subjects. It reports on lesson logs constructed, remediation programs executed, and support provided for students, while also tracking improvements in dropout rates and national assessment results. The overall performance indicates significant achievements in teaching effectiveness and student engagement.

1. Position : Position :
Rating Period : Date of Review :
Bureau/Center/Service/ Division :
Q E T AVE
DEPED RPMS form for Teacher | 1
TEACHING -
LEARNING
PROCESS
July 2015 to
March 2016
GEORGE M. VIBA
MASTER TEACHER I , COORDINATOR
RATING SCORE
Name of Employee : Name of Rater :NAPOLEON B. PICIO
TEACHER - I
DEPED Santiago City
ACTUAL
RESULTSObjectives Timeline
Weight
Per
KRA
Major Final
Output
(MFO)
Key Result Area
(KRA)
Monitored 87% - 93% days attendance intended for for
handheld subjects
Monitored 805 - 86% days attendance intended for
handheld subjects
Math 7 : June
16, 2015 to
March 2016
TLE 9(CHS)
and ICT 7
(SSC): June
29, 2015 to
March 2016
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Constructed 35 and above daily lesson logs each quarter as
specified on the objective 1
Constructed 30 to 34 daily lesson logs each quarter as
specified on the objective 1
Constructed 25 to 29 daily lesson logs each quarter as
specified on the objective 1
Constructed 24 to 28 daily lesson logs each quarter as
specified on the objective 1
Performance Indicator
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness )
Monitored 73% - 79% days attendance intended for
handheld subjects
Monitored 66% and below days attendance intended for
handheld subjects
Constructed 23 and below daily lesson logs each quarter as
specified on the objective 1
5
4
3
2
1
1. Constructed daily lesson logs for my handheld subjects: 35 in each
quarter for Mathematics 7 – Pearl, Jade and Silver with two
appropriate weekly activities; 35 in each quarter for Technology and
Livelihood Education 9 ( Computer Hardware Servicing) – Acacia
with one Learning output outdoor application and 2 Learning output
indoor application weekly; 35 in each quarter for Information and
Computer Technology 7 – Special Science Curriculum with two
Hands on activity weekly
2. Monitored Learners’ attendance to ensure learners presence in
my handheld subjects: 160 days for 7 – Pearl, 7 – Jade, 7 – Silver, 7-
Diamond ( SSC), 9 - Acacia
8%
8%
5
4
3
2
1
Monitored 94% - 100% days attendance intended for
handheld subjects

2. Q E T AVE
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
DEPED RPMS form for Teacher | 2
10%
10%
6%
2%
Drop out rate decreased by 0.66% and above
Drop out rate decreased by 0.46 % - 0.65%
Drop out rate decreased by 0.26% - 0.45%%
Drop out rate decreased by 0.16% - 0.25%
Drop out rate decreased by 0.00% - 0.15%
Trained/ coached 2.00 and above students
Trained/ coached 1.50 - 1.99 students
Trained/ coached 1.00 - 1.49 students
Trained/ coached 0.5 - 0.99 students
No student trained /coached
Evaluated 101 and above students portfolios
5. Attain a 85% passing rate for my students making them acquire a
final rating between 75% and 80% in my handheld subjects at the end
of the current school year.
6. Evaluated 90 portfolios each quarter of the current school year
of Grade 7 mathematics students of Sections Pearl, Jade, and Ruby
7. Trained /Coached 2 contestant of any contest to represent the
school in the division level within the current school year.
8. Helped the school decrease drop out rate by 0.66% within the
current school year
Major Final
Output
(MFO)
3. Monitored 100% of my 206 learners' periodic progress
175.1 - 194.7 students aqcuire final grade between 75% and
80%
154.5 - 174.1 students aqcuire final grade between 75% and
80%
133.9 - 153.5 students aqcuire final grade between 75% and
80%
113.3 - 132.9 students aqcuire final grade between 75% and
80%
5
4
3
2
1
Key Result Area
(KRA)
Objectives Timeline
Weight
Per
KRA
Performance Indicator
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness )
November
2015 to
February 2016
7%
ACTUAL
RESULTS
7%
RATING SCORE
4. Executed a total of 2 approved remediation program from 3rd to
4th quarter to address mathematics learning gaps to 100% of the
learners who have deficiency to Mathematics 7 of the previous
school year
TEACHING -
LEARNING
PROCESS
Monitored 97.09% to 100% students and above
Monitored 77.67% to 96.60% students
Monitored 67.96% to 77.18% students
Monitored 58.25% to 67.48% students
Monitored 38.83% to 57.77% students
4 and above approved remediation executed
3 approved remediation executed
2 approved remediation executed
1 remediation executed
no remediation
Quartely
3rd to 4th
quarter of the
current
school year
3rd to 4th
quarter of the
current
school year
QuarterlySTUDENT
OUTCOME
195.7 and above students acquire final rating between 75%
and 80%
July 2015 to
March 2016
Evaluated 91 - 100 students portfolios
Evaluated 81 - 90 students portfolios
Evaluated 71 - 80 students portfolios
Evaluated 61 and below students portfolios

3. Q E T AVE
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
DEPED RPMS form for Teacher | 3
9. Helped the school increase NAT results by 29 points within the
current school year
12. Installed and maintained 1 computer network in each school
offices and/or learning centers through utilizing TLE 9
( Computer Hardware Servicing) outdoor applications
5%
2%
Participated in 9 or more activities
Participated in 7 - 8 activities
Participated in 5 - 6 activities
Participated in 3 - 4 activities
NAT result increased by 24 points and above
NAT result increased by 18 points - 23 points
NAT result increased by 12 points - 17 points
NAT result increased by 6 points - 11 points
NAT result increased by 0 points - 5 points
Attended 8 - 15 hours seminar/workshop
81% - 100% registered in professional organizations
61% - 80% registered in professional organizations
41% - 60% registered in professional organizations
21% - 40% registered in professional organizations
0% - 20% registered in professional organizations
14. Registered in one membership in professional organization co-
curricular or extra - curricular in any of these levels: school,
community, division, regional, national; within the current school
year
Installed 1 - 3 computer networks with 37.57% and below
maintainace
1
13. Attended 30 – hour seminar/ workshop within the current
school year
July 2015 to
March 2016
July 2015 to
March 2016
12%
3%
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
Attended 40 hours and above seminar/workshop
Attended 32 - 39 hours seminar/workshop
Attended 24 - 31 hours seminar/workshop
Attended 16 -23 hours seminar/workshop
ACTUAL
RESULTS RATING SCORE
Major Final
Output
(MFO)
Key Result Area
(KRA)
Objectives Timeline
Weight
Per
KRA
Performance Indicator
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness )
STUDENT
OUTCOME
Installed 4 -5 computer networks with 47.57% maintainace
5
4
3
2
10%
Installed 10 and above computer networks with 77.57%
maintainace
100% attendance to PTCA Meeting
95% - 99% attendence to PTCA meeting
90% - 94% attendeance to PTCA Meeting
85% - 89% attendance to PTCA meeting
84% and below attendance to PTCA meeting
Installed 8 - 9 computer networks with 67.57% maintainace
Installed 6 -7 computer networks with 57.57% maintainace
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
5%
Participated in 1 -2 activities
10. Participated in curricular( co- / extra) activites sponsored by the
school clubs and organization
11. Attended Periodic PTCA Meeting during the current school year
July 2015 to
March 2016
July 2015 to
March 2016
July 2015 to
March 2016
July 2015 to
March 2016

4. Q E T AVE
5
4
3
2
1
DEPED RPMS form for Teacher | 4
OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
RATING SCORE
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
NESTOR R. LUCAS
APPROVING AUTHORITY
NAPOLEON B. PICIO
RATEE
Major Final
Output
(MFO)
Key Result Area
(KRA)
Objectives Timeline
Weight
Per
KRA
GEORGE M. VIBA
RATER
Principal IVMaster Teacher I Teacher I
5%
Performance Indicator
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness )
ACTUAL
RESULTS
July 2015 to
March 2016
15. Provided 85% technical assistance to computers among co –
workers ranging from offices to their personal technical needs
within the current school year
Provided assistance by 85% to 100%
Provided assistance by 70% to 84%
Provided assistance by 55% to 74%
Provided assistance by 40% to 54%
Provided assistance by 25% to 39%