The document provides guidance on developing SMART objectives for an IPCRF (Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form). It emphasizes that objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. Examples are provided of objectives that meet these criteria for competencies like teaching/learning, pupil outcomes, and community involvement. Key aspects that should be measured include quality, efficiency, and timeliness. Objectives should have at least two measurable performance indicators. The document also notes some non-negotiables for an IPCRF like teaching/learning targets and drop-out rates.

1. IPCRF
Preparation
Mariches E. Begino
SHT 1

7. What should be considered?
Objectives should be SMART
Specific
Is the result achievable?
 Can a supervisor verify the result?
What would be the result look like?

8. Measurable
Quantity
 Quality
Time
Cost Effectiveness

9. Achievable
Is the objective achievable in the
available resource of time?
Is the work within the individual
control or view?
 Is the objective appropriate to the
individual experience skill and work
level?
Is it appropriate within a job
description?

10. Relevant
Employees Job
Ratee’s Objective
 Unit Objective
Organization Objective

11. Time Bound
Within an specific measure of time
frame

12. Example:
By ________/________/_________(When,
Who? What? Include a number you can
measure)will have ___________(How? Why?
Remember to specify results using QET
Criteria)

13. Remember:
If QET is hard to be done, then there is a
problem with the objective ( Not SMART)
3 objectives per KRA
Turn generic into specific
Presence of at least 2 measure per objective

14. QET:
Quantity – Raw Numbers, Percentages
Quality – e.g. Accuracy, Effectiveness
Efficiency- (e.g., pesos/money saved, time saved)
Timeliness- (e.g., within 3 months)

16. Remember:
IPCRF is just like making LP
Objective must start with the verb last is time
If the focus is person, use number not %
Do not shortcut

17. CCompetency

18. Lets Examine:
(What is missing?)

19. Community Involvement
 Objective
 Prepared
and
submitted
complete
160 DLL
within the
scheduled
date of
checking.
 Quality
5- Prepared and
submitted 160 DLL
4- Prepared and
submitted 150-159
DLL
3- Prepared and
submitted 130-149
DLL
2- Prepared and
submitted 120-129
DLL
1- Prepared and
submitted 119 DLL
and below.
 Efficiency  Timeliness
5- Submitted DLL on
scheduled time.
4- Submitted DLL One
(1) day late from
scheduled checking.
3- Submitted DLL Two
(2) days late from
scheduled checking.
2- Submitted DLL
Three (3) days late
from scheduled
checking
1- Submitted DLL Four
(4) and more days late
from scheduled
checkin.g

20. Community Involvement
 Objective
 Conducted
six (6)
general
/parents
assembly
meeting with
75% parents
attendance
within the
scheduled
date.
 Quality
5-conducted
6 GA meetings
4-conducted
5 GA meetings
3- conducted
4 GA meetings
2-conducted
3 GA meetings
1- conducted
1 or 2 GA
meetings
 Efficiency
5- conducted meetings
/assemblies with 75%
parents attendance.
4- with 70% to 74.99
% parents attendance.
3- with 65 % to 69.99
% parents attendance.
2- with 60 % to 64.99
% parents attendance.
1- with 5 0 % and
below parents
attendance.
 Timeliness
5-Conducted Meetings
on scheduled time.
4- Conducted meeting
One (1) day late from
the schedule date.
3-Conducted meeting
Two (2) days late from
the schedule date.
2- Conducted meeting
Three (3) days late
from the schedule
date.
1- Conducted meeting
Four (4) and more
days late from
schedule date.

21. SDO Cam. Norte
Non Negotiables
 Teaching Learning (40%)
 DLL Preparation (20%)
 Competencies (10%)
 Pupils’ Outcome (30%)
 NAT Target (10%)
 Drop out Rate (10%)
 Community Involvement (15%)
 6 Gen. Assembly meeting (5%)
 Community Involvement (15%)
Plus Factor used for IPCRF can not be used
in promotion