SlideShare a Scribd company logo
INDIA RANKINGS 2020
NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL RANKING FRAMEWORK
Methodology for Ranking of Academic Institutions in India
(RANKING METRICS FOR ENGINEERING)
Ministry of Human Resource Development
Summary of Ranking Parameters and Weightages- 2020
(Engineering)
Sr.
No.
Parameter Marks Weightage
1 Teaching, Learning & Resources 100 0.30
2 Research and Professional Practice 100 0.30
3 Graduation Outcomes 100 0.20
4 Outreach and Inclusivity 100 0.10
5 Perception 100 0.10
S.No. Parameters Marks
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR)
Ranking weight: 0.30
100
A. Student Strength including Doctoral Students(SS): 20 marks
B. Faculty-student ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30
marks
C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and
Experience (FQE): 20 marks
D. Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 marks
2. Research and Professional Practice (RP)
Ranking weight: 0.30
100
A. Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks
B. Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 marks
C. IPR and Patents: Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks
D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks
3. Graduation Outcomes (GO)
Ranking weight: 0.20
100
A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks
B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 marks
C. Median Salary (GMS): 25 marks
D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 marks
4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI)
Ranking weight: 0.10
100
A. Percentage of Students from other States/Countries (Region Diversity
RD): 30 marks
B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks
C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS): 20 marks
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks
5. Perception (PR)
Ranking weight: 0.10
100
A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR): 100 marks
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.30
• Overall Assessment Metric:
TLR = SS (20) + FSR (30) + FQE (20) + FRU (30)
• Component metrics based on :
A. Student Strength including Ph.D. Students: SS
B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty: FSR
C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience:
FQE
D. Financial Resources and Their Utilisation: FRU
A. Student Strength including Ph.D. students (SS): 20 Marks
• SS = f(NT, NE) × 15 + f(NP) × 5
• The functions f(NT ,NE) and f(Np) are functions to be determined by NIRF.
• NT: Total sanctioned approved intake in the institution considering all UG and PG
programs of the institution.
• NE: Total number of students enrolled in the institution considering all UG and PG
Programs of the institution.
• Np = Total number of students enrolled for the doctoral program till previous academic
year.
• Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed Format.
B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30 marks
• FSR = 30 × [15 × (F/N)]
• N =NT+ Np
• F: Full time regular faculty in the institution in the previous year.
• Regular appointment means Faculty on Full time basis. Faculty on contract basis/ad-hoc
basis will be considered if the concerned faculty has taught in both the semesters of
academic year 2018-19.
• Faculty members with Ph.D. and M.E./M.Tech. will be considered and counted here.
Faculty member with a Bachelor’s degree will not be counted.
• Expected ratio is 1:15 to score maximum marks.
• For F/N < 1: 50, FSR will be set to zero.
• Primary Data: Faculty List to be provided in the Prescribed Format.
C. Combined Metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience (FQE): 20 marks
• FQ = 10 × (FRA/95) , FRA < 95%;
• FQ = 10, FRA ≥ 95%.
• Here FRA is the percentage of Faculty with Ph.D. (or equivalent qualification) with
respect to the total no. of faculty required or actual faculty whichever is higher, in the
previous year.
F1=Fraction with Experience up to 8 years;
F2= Fraction with Experience between 8+ to 15 years;
F3=Fraction with Experience > 15 years.
• FE = 3min(3F1, 1) + 3 min(3F2, 1) + 4 min(3F3, 1)
Rationale: Full marks for a ratio of 1:1:1
• FQE = FQ + FE
• Primary Data: Faculty List in the Prescribed Format.
D: Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 Marks
• FRU = 7.5×f(BC) + 22.5×f(BO)
• BC: Average Annual Capital Expenditure per student for previous three years pertaining
to engineering discipline only. (Excluding expenditure on construction of new
buildings)
• BO: Average Annual Operational(or Recurring) Expenditure per student for previous
three years pertaining to engineering discipline only. (Excluding maintenance of
hostels and allied services)
• Primary Data: Figures in prescribed format for each.
2.Research and Professional Practice (RP): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.30
• Overall Assessment Metric:
RP = PU(35) + QP(40) + IPR(15) + FPPP(10)
• The component metrics explained on following pages.
A. Combined Metric for Publications: PU
B. Combined Metric for Quality of Publications: QP
C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted: IPR
D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice: FPPP
A.Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks
• PU = 35 × f(P/FRQ)
• P is weighted number of publications as acertained from suitable third party sources.
• FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis of
a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution.
• Sources: Third party sources.
B.Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 Marks
• QP = 20 × f (CC/FRQ) + 20× f (TOP25P/P)
• Here CC is Total Citation Count over previous three years.
• P is as computed for PU.
• TOP25P: Number of citations in top 25 percentile averaged over the previous three
years.
• FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis
of a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution.
• Primary Data: Third Party Sources.
C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks
• IPR = IPG + IPP
IPG = 10× f (PG)
• PG is the number of patents granted over the previous three years.
IPP = 5 × f (PP)
• PP: No. of patents published over the previous three years.
• Primary Data: Third Party Sources.
D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks
• FPPP = FPR + FPC
• FPR = 7.5 × f (RF)
• RF is average annual research funding earnings (amount actually received in rupees) per
faculty at institute level in previous three years.
• FPC = 2.5 × f (CF)
• CF is average annual consultancy amount (amount actually received in rupees) per
faculty at institute level in previous three years.
3. Graduation Outcome (GO):100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.20
• Overall Assessment Metric:
• GO = GPH(40) + GUE(15) + GMS(25) + GPHD(20)
• The component metrics are explained on the following pages:
A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies: GPH
B. Metric for University Examinations: GUE
C. Median Salary: GMS
D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated: GPHD
A. Combined Metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks
• GPH = 40 × (Np/100 +Nhs/100)
• Np = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) placed in the previous
three years.
• Nhs = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) who have been selected
for higher studies in the previous three years.
• Primary Data: To be provided in prescribed format.
B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 Marks
• GUE = 15 × min [(Ng/80), 1]
• Ng is the percentage of Students (as a fraction of the approved intake), averaged over
previous three years, passing the respective university examinations in stipulated time
for the program in which enrolled.
• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
C. Median Salary(GMS): 25 Marks
• GMS = 25 × f (MS)
• MS = Median salary of graduates (in UG/PG program) in the previous three years
from an institution.
• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
D. Metric for Number of Ph.D Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 Marks
• GPHD = 20 × f(Nphd)
• Nphd = Average number of Ph.D students graduated (awarded Ph.D) over the previous
three years.
• Primary Data: Number of graduating Ph.D. Students as reflected in the approved
Annual Report/Convocation Report to be provided in the prescribed format.
4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.10
• Overall Assessment Metric: OI = RD(30) + WD(30) +ESCS(20) + PCS(20)
• The component metrics are explained on following pages:
A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity): RD
B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity): WD
C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students: ESCS
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students: PCS
A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity RD): 30 marks
• RD = 25 × fraction of total students enrolled from other states + 5 × fraction of
students enrolled from other countries
• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks
• WD = 15 × (NWS/50) + 15 × (NWF/20)
• NWS are the percentage of Women students.
• NWF are the percentage of Women Faculty including the women members in senior
administrative positions, such as Heads of Departments, Deans or Institute Heads.
• Expectation: 50% women students and 20% women faculty.
• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
C.Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS) : 20 marks
• ESCS = 20 × f(Nesc)
• Nesc is the percentage of UG students being provided full tuition fee rembursement by
the institution to pursue their degree programs.
• Primary Data: To be provided by the institution in the prescribed format.
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks
• PCS = 20 marks, if the Institute provides full facilities for physically challenged
students, as outlined.
Else, in proportion to facilities.
• Basis: Verifiable Responses to Questions.
• Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed format.
5. Perception (PR) – 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.1
• Overall Assessment Metric: PR = 100
• Component metrics are explained in the following pages:
A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peers: (PR)
A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR) : 100 marks
• This is to be done through a survey conducted over a large category of Employers,
Professionals from Reputed Organizations and a large category of academics to
ascertain their preference for graduates of different institutions.
• Comprehensive list will be prepared taking into account various sectors, regions, etc.
• Lists to be updated periodically.

More Related Content

What's hot

Introduction to Systematic Literature Review method
Introduction to Systematic Literature Review methodIntroduction to Systematic Literature Review method
Introduction to Systematic Literature Review method
Norsaremah Salleh
 
Choosing research topic[1]
Choosing research topic[1]Choosing research topic[1]
Choosing research topic[1]
Bahauddin Zakariya University lahore
 
26.10.15 literature survey
26.10.15 literature survey26.10.15 literature survey
26.10.15 literature survey
kavroom
 
Writing research proposal
Writing research proposal Writing research proposal
Writing research proposal
Kaimrc_Rss_Jd
 
Research paper writing
Research paper writingResearch paper writing
Research paper writing
MuzammalMatyana
 
Database and Research Matrix.pptx
Database and Research Matrix.pptxDatabase and Research Matrix.pptx
Database and Research Matrix.pptx
RahulRoshan37
 
Hypertext
HypertextHypertext
Literature review in research
Literature review in researchLiterature review in research
Literature review in research
Riddhi Bhatt
 
Literature review (1)
Literature review (1)Literature review (1)
Literature review (1)
sudarsana kumar
 
Shodhganga: a National Repository of Indian Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Shodhganga: a National Repository of Indian Electronic Theses and DissertationsShodhganga: a National Repository of Indian Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Shodhganga: a National Repository of Indian Electronic Theses and Dissertations
shodhganga
 
Research metrices (cite score)
Research metrices (cite score)Research metrices (cite score)
Research metrices (cite score)
Aboul Ella Hassanien
 
Literature survey
Literature surveyLiterature survey
Literature survey
Anamika Banerjee
 
1 Year PhD Presentation
1 Year PhD Presentation1 Year PhD Presentation
1 Year PhD Presentation
L. Carlos Freire
 
Publication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and Importance
Publication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and ImportancePublication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and Importance
Publication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and Importance
Vasantha Raju N
 
6. referencing styles
6. referencing styles6. referencing styles
Referencing styles & Bibliography
Referencing styles & BibliographyReferencing styles & Bibliography
Referencing styles & Bibliography
Prakash Aryal
 
Literature Review
Literature ReviewLiterature Review
Literature Review
ofoymungu vivian
 
Developing your research skills
Developing your research skillsDeveloping your research skills
Developing your research skills
Samantha Halford
 
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of Data
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSelective Reporting and Misrepresentation of Data
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of Data
Saptarshi Ghosh
 
Literature review
Literature reviewLiterature review
Literature review
salonibansal21
 

What's hot (20)

Introduction to Systematic Literature Review method
Introduction to Systematic Literature Review methodIntroduction to Systematic Literature Review method
Introduction to Systematic Literature Review method
 
Choosing research topic[1]
Choosing research topic[1]Choosing research topic[1]
Choosing research topic[1]
 
26.10.15 literature survey
26.10.15 literature survey26.10.15 literature survey
26.10.15 literature survey
 
Writing research proposal
Writing research proposal Writing research proposal
Writing research proposal
 
Research paper writing
Research paper writingResearch paper writing
Research paper writing
 
Database and Research Matrix.pptx
Database and Research Matrix.pptxDatabase and Research Matrix.pptx
Database and Research Matrix.pptx
 
Hypertext
HypertextHypertext
Hypertext
 
Literature review in research
Literature review in researchLiterature review in research
Literature review in research
 
Literature review (1)
Literature review (1)Literature review (1)
Literature review (1)
 
Shodhganga: a National Repository of Indian Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Shodhganga: a National Repository of Indian Electronic Theses and DissertationsShodhganga: a National Repository of Indian Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Shodhganga: a National Repository of Indian Electronic Theses and Dissertations
 
Research metrices (cite score)
Research metrices (cite score)Research metrices (cite score)
Research metrices (cite score)
 
Literature survey
Literature surveyLiterature survey
Literature survey
 
1 Year PhD Presentation
1 Year PhD Presentation1 Year PhD Presentation
1 Year PhD Presentation
 
Publication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and Importance
Publication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and ImportancePublication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and Importance
Publication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and Importance
 
6. referencing styles
6. referencing styles6. referencing styles
6. referencing styles
 
Referencing styles & Bibliography
Referencing styles & BibliographyReferencing styles & Bibliography
Referencing styles & Bibliography
 
Literature Review
Literature ReviewLiterature Review
Literature Review
 
Developing your research skills
Developing your research skillsDeveloping your research skills
Developing your research skills
 
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of Data
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSelective Reporting and Misrepresentation of Data
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of Data
 
Literature review
Literature reviewLiterature review
Literature review
 

Similar to Engineering nirf ranking methodlogy

NBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 institute
NBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 instituteNBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 institute
NBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 institute
Bharti Shinde
 
NBA Criteria in Detail.pptx
NBA Criteria in Detail.pptxNBA Criteria in Detail.pptx
NBA Criteria in Detail.pptx
lowlesh1
 
academicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdf
academicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdfacademicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdf
academicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdf
Dr. Sreedhar Rao
 
Academic performance indicators (api)
Academic performance indicators (api)Academic performance indicators (api)
Academic performance indicators (api)
Vetrivel Krishnan
 
evaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdf
evaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdfevaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdf
evaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdf
Anbuselvi Mathivanan
 
C7 Presentation.pptx.pptx
C7 Presentation.pptx.pptxC7 Presentation.pptx.pptx
C7 Presentation.pptx.pptx
MahiyughaaASIX
 
QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)
QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)
QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)
DrArvindChavhan1
 
QIF Quality Indicative Framework
QIF Quality Indicative FrameworkQIF Quality Indicative Framework
QIF Quality Indicative Framework
arvind_bioinfo26
 
NAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated Colleges
NAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated CollegesNAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated Colleges
NAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated Colleges
Rishi Bankim Chandra Evening College, Naihati, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India
 
Affiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdf
Affiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdfAffiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdf
Affiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdf
HuzefaBhagat
 
ug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdf
ug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdfug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdf
ug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdf
deepakiitbhu
 
pre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdf
pre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdfpre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdf
pre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdf
deepakiitbhu
 
Nba co attainment
Nba co attainmentNba co attainment
Nba co attainment
SHIMI S L
 
Basic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in India
Basic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in IndiaBasic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in India
Basic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in India
Dr. Amit Gangwal Jain (MPharm., PhD.)
 
BU Overall.pdf
BU Overall.pdfBU Overall.pdf
BU Overall.pdf
amitpandey602129
 
Choice based credit system Dr.Ravindra kshirsagar
Choice based credit system Dr.Ravindra kshirsagarChoice based credit system Dr.Ravindra kshirsagar
NAAC Manual for autonomous colleges
NAAC Manual for autonomous collegesNAAC Manual for autonomous colleges
NAAC Manual for autonomous colleges
syed mohamed
 
A Brief expression on National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Ma...
A Brief expression on National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Ma...A Brief expression on National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Ma...
A Brief expression on National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Ma...
Sudhakar Babu
 
lady-ann-KPI-2022-1.pptx
lady-ann-KPI-2022-1.pptxlady-ann-KPI-2022-1.pptx
lady-ann-KPI-2022-1.pptx
hendrix18
 
Assessment.ppt
Assessment.pptAssessment.ppt
Assessment.ppt
Prakash609777
 

Similar to Engineering nirf ranking methodlogy (20)

NBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 institute
NBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 instituteNBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 institute
NBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 institute
 
NBA Criteria in Detail.pptx
NBA Criteria in Detail.pptxNBA Criteria in Detail.pptx
NBA Criteria in Detail.pptx
 
academicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdf
academicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdfacademicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdf
academicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdf
 
Academic performance indicators (api)
Academic performance indicators (api)Academic performance indicators (api)
Academic performance indicators (api)
 
evaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdf
evaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdfevaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdf
evaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdf
 
C7 Presentation.pptx.pptx
C7 Presentation.pptx.pptxC7 Presentation.pptx.pptx
C7 Presentation.pptx.pptx
 
QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)
QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)
QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)
 
QIF Quality Indicative Framework
QIF Quality Indicative FrameworkQIF Quality Indicative Framework
QIF Quality Indicative Framework
 
NAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated Colleges
NAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated CollegesNAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated Colleges
NAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated Colleges
 
Affiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdf
Affiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdfAffiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdf
Affiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdf
 
ug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdf
ug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdfug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdf
ug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdf
 
pre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdf
pre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdfpre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdf
pre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdf
 
Nba co attainment
Nba co attainmentNba co attainment
Nba co attainment
 
Basic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in India
Basic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in IndiaBasic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in India
Basic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in India
 
BU Overall.pdf
BU Overall.pdfBU Overall.pdf
BU Overall.pdf
 
Choice based credit system Dr.Ravindra kshirsagar
Choice based credit system Dr.Ravindra kshirsagarChoice based credit system Dr.Ravindra kshirsagar
Choice based credit system Dr.Ravindra kshirsagar
 
NAAC Manual for autonomous colleges
NAAC Manual for autonomous collegesNAAC Manual for autonomous colleges
NAAC Manual for autonomous colleges
 
A Brief expression on National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Ma...
A Brief expression on National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Ma...A Brief expression on National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Ma...
A Brief expression on National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Ma...
 
lady-ann-KPI-2022-1.pptx
lady-ann-KPI-2022-1.pptxlady-ann-KPI-2022-1.pptx
lady-ann-KPI-2022-1.pptx
 
Assessment.ppt
Assessment.pptAssessment.ppt
Assessment.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part IIIRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Aditya Rajan Patra
 
Swimming pool mechanical components design.pptx
Swimming pool  mechanical components design.pptxSwimming pool  mechanical components design.pptx
Swimming pool mechanical components design.pptx
yokeleetan1
 
Series of visio cisco devices Cisco_Icons.ppt
Series of visio cisco devices Cisco_Icons.pptSeries of visio cisco devices Cisco_Icons.ppt
Series of visio cisco devices Cisco_Icons.ppt
PauloRodrigues104553
 
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
ihlasbinance2003
 
2. Operations Strategy in a Global Environment.ppt
2. Operations Strategy in a Global Environment.ppt2. Operations Strategy in a Global Environment.ppt
2. Operations Strategy in a Global Environment.ppt
PuktoonEngr
 
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdfNew techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
wisnuprabawa3
 
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
Rahul
 
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningUnderstanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
SUTEJAS
 
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
University of Maribor
 
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testingPPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
anoopmanoharan2
 
Question paper of renewable energy sources
Question paper of renewable energy sourcesQuestion paper of renewable energy sources
Question paper of renewable energy sources
mahammadsalmanmech
 
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptxML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
JamalHussainArman
 
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesHarnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Christina Lin
 
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODELDEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
gerogepatton
 
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdfIron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
RadiNasr
 
Low power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniques
Low power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniquesLow power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniques
Low power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniques
nooriasukmaningtyas
 
[JPP-1] - (JEE 3.0) - Kinematics 1D - 14th May..pdf
[JPP-1] - (JEE 3.0) - Kinematics 1D - 14th May..pdf[JPP-1] - (JEE 3.0) - Kinematics 1D - 14th May..pdf
[JPP-1] - (JEE 3.0) - Kinematics 1D - 14th May..pdf
awadeshbabu
 
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMSA SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
IJNSA Journal
 
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptxManufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Madan Karki
 
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdfbasic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
NidhalKahouli2
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part IIIRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
 
Swimming pool mechanical components design.pptx
Swimming pool  mechanical components design.pptxSwimming pool  mechanical components design.pptx
Swimming pool mechanical components design.pptx
 
Series of visio cisco devices Cisco_Icons.ppt
Series of visio cisco devices Cisco_Icons.pptSeries of visio cisco devices Cisco_Icons.ppt
Series of visio cisco devices Cisco_Icons.ppt
 
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
 
2. Operations Strategy in a Global Environment.ppt
2. Operations Strategy in a Global Environment.ppt2. Operations Strategy in a Global Environment.ppt
2. Operations Strategy in a Global Environment.ppt
 
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdfNew techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
 
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
 
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningUnderstanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine Learning
 
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
 
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testingPPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
PPT on GRP pipes manufacturing and testing
 
Question paper of renewable energy sources
Question paper of renewable energy sourcesQuestion paper of renewable energy sources
Question paper of renewable energy sources
 
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptxML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
 
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesHarnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming Pipelines
 
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODELDEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODEL
 
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdfIron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
 
Low power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniques
Low power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniquesLow power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniques
Low power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniques
 
[JPP-1] - (JEE 3.0) - Kinematics 1D - 14th May..pdf
[JPP-1] - (JEE 3.0) - Kinematics 1D - 14th May..pdf[JPP-1] - (JEE 3.0) - Kinematics 1D - 14th May..pdf
[JPP-1] - (JEE 3.0) - Kinematics 1D - 14th May..pdf
 
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMSA SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
 
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptxManufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
 
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdfbasic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
 

Engineering nirf ranking methodlogy

  • 1. INDIA RANKINGS 2020 NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL RANKING FRAMEWORK Methodology for Ranking of Academic Institutions in India (RANKING METRICS FOR ENGINEERING) Ministry of Human Resource Development
  • 2. Summary of Ranking Parameters and Weightages- 2020 (Engineering) Sr. No. Parameter Marks Weightage 1 Teaching, Learning & Resources 100 0.30 2 Research and Professional Practice 100 0.30 3 Graduation Outcomes 100 0.20 4 Outreach and Inclusivity 100 0.10 5 Perception 100 0.10
  • 3. S.No. Parameters Marks 1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR) Ranking weight: 0.30 100 A. Student Strength including Doctoral Students(SS): 20 marks B. Faculty-student ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30 marks C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience (FQE): 20 marks D. Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 marks 2. Research and Professional Practice (RP) Ranking weight: 0.30 100 A. Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks B. Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 marks C. IPR and Patents: Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks 3. Graduation Outcomes (GO) Ranking weight: 0.20 100 A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 marks C. Median Salary (GMS): 25 marks D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 marks 4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI) Ranking weight: 0.10 100 A. Percentage of Students from other States/Countries (Region Diversity RD): 30 marks B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS): 20 marks D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks 5. Perception (PR) Ranking weight: 0.10 100 A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR): 100 marks
  • 4. 1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR): 100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.30 • Overall Assessment Metric: TLR = SS (20) + FSR (30) + FQE (20) + FRU (30) • Component metrics based on : A. Student Strength including Ph.D. Students: SS B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty: FSR C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience: FQE D. Financial Resources and Their Utilisation: FRU
  • 5. A. Student Strength including Ph.D. students (SS): 20 Marks • SS = f(NT, NE) × 15 + f(NP) × 5 • The functions f(NT ,NE) and f(Np) are functions to be determined by NIRF. • NT: Total sanctioned approved intake in the institution considering all UG and PG programs of the institution. • NE: Total number of students enrolled in the institution considering all UG and PG Programs of the institution. • Np = Total number of students enrolled for the doctoral program till previous academic year. • Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed Format.
  • 6. B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30 marks • FSR = 30 × [15 × (F/N)] • N =NT+ Np • F: Full time regular faculty in the institution in the previous year. • Regular appointment means Faculty on Full time basis. Faculty on contract basis/ad-hoc basis will be considered if the concerned faculty has taught in both the semesters of academic year 2018-19. • Faculty members with Ph.D. and M.E./M.Tech. will be considered and counted here. Faculty member with a Bachelor’s degree will not be counted. • Expected ratio is 1:15 to score maximum marks. • For F/N < 1: 50, FSR will be set to zero. • Primary Data: Faculty List to be provided in the Prescribed Format.
  • 7. C. Combined Metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience (FQE): 20 marks • FQ = 10 × (FRA/95) , FRA < 95%; • FQ = 10, FRA ≥ 95%. • Here FRA is the percentage of Faculty with Ph.D. (or equivalent qualification) with respect to the total no. of faculty required or actual faculty whichever is higher, in the previous year. F1=Fraction with Experience up to 8 years; F2= Fraction with Experience between 8+ to 15 years; F3=Fraction with Experience > 15 years. • FE = 3min(3F1, 1) + 3 min(3F2, 1) + 4 min(3F3, 1) Rationale: Full marks for a ratio of 1:1:1 • FQE = FQ + FE • Primary Data: Faculty List in the Prescribed Format.
  • 8. D: Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 Marks • FRU = 7.5×f(BC) + 22.5×f(BO) • BC: Average Annual Capital Expenditure per student for previous three years pertaining to engineering discipline only. (Excluding expenditure on construction of new buildings) • BO: Average Annual Operational(or Recurring) Expenditure per student for previous three years pertaining to engineering discipline only. (Excluding maintenance of hostels and allied services) • Primary Data: Figures in prescribed format for each.
  • 9. 2.Research and Professional Practice (RP): 100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.30 • Overall Assessment Metric: RP = PU(35) + QP(40) + IPR(15) + FPPP(10) • The component metrics explained on following pages. A. Combined Metric for Publications: PU B. Combined Metric for Quality of Publications: QP C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted: IPR D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice: FPPP
  • 10. A.Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks • PU = 35 × f(P/FRQ) • P is weighted number of publications as acertained from suitable third party sources. • FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis of a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution. • Sources: Third party sources.
  • 11. B.Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 Marks • QP = 20 × f (CC/FRQ) + 20× f (TOP25P/P) • Here CC is Total Citation Count over previous three years. • P is as computed for PU. • TOP25P: Number of citations in top 25 percentile averaged over the previous three years. • FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis of a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution. • Primary Data: Third Party Sources.
  • 12. C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks • IPR = IPG + IPP IPG = 10× f (PG) • PG is the number of patents granted over the previous three years. IPP = 5 × f (PP) • PP: No. of patents published over the previous three years. • Primary Data: Third Party Sources.
  • 13. D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks • FPPP = FPR + FPC • FPR = 7.5 × f (RF) • RF is average annual research funding earnings (amount actually received in rupees) per faculty at institute level in previous three years. • FPC = 2.5 × f (CF) • CF is average annual consultancy amount (amount actually received in rupees) per faculty at institute level in previous three years.
  • 14. 3. Graduation Outcome (GO):100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.20 • Overall Assessment Metric: • GO = GPH(40) + GUE(15) + GMS(25) + GPHD(20) • The component metrics are explained on the following pages: A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies: GPH B. Metric for University Examinations: GUE C. Median Salary: GMS D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated: GPHD
  • 15. A. Combined Metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks • GPH = 40 × (Np/100 +Nhs/100) • Np = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) placed in the previous three years. • Nhs = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) who have been selected for higher studies in the previous three years. • Primary Data: To be provided in prescribed format.
  • 16. B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 Marks • GUE = 15 × min [(Ng/80), 1] • Ng is the percentage of Students (as a fraction of the approved intake), averaged over previous three years, passing the respective university examinations in stipulated time for the program in which enrolled. • Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 17. C. Median Salary(GMS): 25 Marks • GMS = 25 × f (MS) • MS = Median salary of graduates (in UG/PG program) in the previous three years from an institution. • Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 18. D. Metric for Number of Ph.D Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 Marks • GPHD = 20 × f(Nphd) • Nphd = Average number of Ph.D students graduated (awarded Ph.D) over the previous three years. • Primary Data: Number of graduating Ph.D. Students as reflected in the approved Annual Report/Convocation Report to be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 19. 4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI): 100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.10 • Overall Assessment Metric: OI = RD(30) + WD(30) +ESCS(20) + PCS(20) • The component metrics are explained on following pages: A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity): RD B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity): WD C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students: ESCS D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students: PCS
  • 20. A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity RD): 30 marks • RD = 25 × fraction of total students enrolled from other states + 5 × fraction of students enrolled from other countries • Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 21. B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks • WD = 15 × (NWS/50) + 15 × (NWF/20) • NWS are the percentage of Women students. • NWF are the percentage of Women Faculty including the women members in senior administrative positions, such as Heads of Departments, Deans or Institute Heads. • Expectation: 50% women students and 20% women faculty. • Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 22. C.Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS) : 20 marks • ESCS = 20 × f(Nesc) • Nesc is the percentage of UG students being provided full tuition fee rembursement by the institution to pursue their degree programs. • Primary Data: To be provided by the institution in the prescribed format.
  • 23. D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks • PCS = 20 marks, if the Institute provides full facilities for physically challenged students, as outlined. Else, in proportion to facilities. • Basis: Verifiable Responses to Questions. • Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed format.
  • 24. 5. Perception (PR) – 100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.1 • Overall Assessment Metric: PR = 100 • Component metrics are explained in the following pages: A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peers: (PR)
  • 25. A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR) : 100 marks • This is to be done through a survey conducted over a large category of Employers, Professionals from Reputed Organizations and a large category of academics to ascertain their preference for graduates of different institutions. • Comprehensive list will be prepared taking into account various sectors, regions, etc. • Lists to be updated periodically.