Ethics in medical sciences research may not always translate into ethical publications.
Ethical violations in conducting medical research always promote unethical scientific publications.
Published research influences other researchers and establishes credibility for individual or journal.
Redundant, Duplicate and Repetitive publications are the most important concerns in the scientific research/literature writing. The occurrence of redundancy affects the concepts of science/literature and carries with it sanctions of consequences. To define this issue is much challenging because of the many varieties in which one can slice, reformat, or reproduce material from an already published study. This issue also goes beyond the duplication of a single study because it might possible that the same or similar data can be published in the early, middle, and later stages of an on-going study. This may have a damaging impact on the scientific study/literature base. Similar to slicing a cake, there are so many ways of representing a study or a set of data/information. We can slice a cake into different shapes like squares, triangles, rounds, or layers. Which of these might be the best way to slice a cake? Unfortunately, this may be the wrong question. The point is that the cake that is being referred to, the data/ information set or the study/findings, should not be sliced at all. Instead, the study should be presented as a whole to the readership to ensure the integrity of science/technology because of the impact that may have on patients who will be affected by the information contained in the literature/findings. Redundant, duplicate, or repetitive publications occur when there is representation of two or more studies, data sets, or publications in either electronic or print media. The publications can overlap partially or completely, such that a similar portion, major component(s), or complete representation of a previously/simultaneous ly or future published study is duplicated.
SALAMI SLICING: The slicing of research publication that would form one meaningful paper into several different papers is known as salami publication or salami slicing. Unlike duplicate publication, which involves reporting the exact same data in two or more publications, salami slicing involves breaking up or segmenting a large study into two or more publications. These segments are called slices of a study. As a general rule, as long as the slices of a broken-up study share the same hypotheses, population, and methods, this is not acceptable in general practice. The same slice should never be published more than once at all. According to the United States Office of Research Integrity (USORI), salami slicing can result in a distortion of the literature/findings by leading unsuspecting readers to believe that data presented in each salami slice (journal article) is derived from a different subject sample/source. Somehow this practice not only skews the scientific database but it creates repetition to waste reader's time as well as the time of editors and peer reviewers, who must also handle each paper separately.
Ethical research and publication practices are essential for honest scholarly and scientific research. Most journals today are keenly aware of this: they publish policies on these issues and expect authors to “be aware of, and comply with, best practice in publication ethics”.This article discusses two widespread and related publishing practices that are considered unethical—duplicate publication and simultaneous submission. It draws on definitive international publication ethics guidelines.
Ethics in medical sciences research may not always translate into ethical publications.
Ethical violations in conducting medical research always promote unethical scientific publications.
Published research influences other researchers and establishes credibility for individual or journal.
Redundant, Duplicate and Repetitive publications are the most important concerns in the scientific research/literature writing. The occurrence of redundancy affects the concepts of science/literature and carries with it sanctions of consequences. To define this issue is much challenging because of the many varieties in which one can slice, reformat, or reproduce material from an already published study. This issue also goes beyond the duplication of a single study because it might possible that the same or similar data can be published in the early, middle, and later stages of an on-going study. This may have a damaging impact on the scientific study/literature base. Similar to slicing a cake, there are so many ways of representing a study or a set of data/information. We can slice a cake into different shapes like squares, triangles, rounds, or layers. Which of these might be the best way to slice a cake? Unfortunately, this may be the wrong question. The point is that the cake that is being referred to, the data/ information set or the study/findings, should not be sliced at all. Instead, the study should be presented as a whole to the readership to ensure the integrity of science/technology because of the impact that may have on patients who will be affected by the information contained in the literature/findings. Redundant, duplicate, or repetitive publications occur when there is representation of two or more studies, data sets, or publications in either electronic or print media. The publications can overlap partially or completely, such that a similar portion, major component(s), or complete representation of a previously/simultaneous ly or future published study is duplicated.
SALAMI SLICING: The slicing of research publication that would form one meaningful paper into several different papers is known as salami publication or salami slicing. Unlike duplicate publication, which involves reporting the exact same data in two or more publications, salami slicing involves breaking up or segmenting a large study into two or more publications. These segments are called slices of a study. As a general rule, as long as the slices of a broken-up study share the same hypotheses, population, and methods, this is not acceptable in general practice. The same slice should never be published more than once at all. According to the United States Office of Research Integrity (USORI), salami slicing can result in a distortion of the literature/findings by leading unsuspecting readers to believe that data presented in each salami slice (journal article) is derived from a different subject sample/source. Somehow this practice not only skews the scientific database but it creates repetition to waste reader's time as well as the time of editors and peer reviewers, who must also handle each paper separately.
Ethical research and publication practices are essential for honest scholarly and scientific research. Most journals today are keenly aware of this: they publish policies on these issues and expect authors to “be aware of, and comply with, best practice in publication ethics”.This article discusses two widespread and related publishing practices that are considered unethical—duplicate publication and simultaneous submission. It draws on definitive international publication ethics guidelines.
In this presentation, the speaker has covered following topics:
What is scientific conduct?
What do we mean by ethics in research? – scientific temperament –
What is Ethical behavior in research?
How to practice Ethics in publication?
On Research Metrics -
Author level metrics to journal level metrics
Research Profile Digital Platforms.
Predatory Publications and Software Tools for IdentificationSaptarshi Ghosh
Journals that publish work without proper peer review and which charge scholars sometimes huge fees to submit should not be allowed to share space with legitimate journals and publishers, whether open access or not. These journals and publishers cheapen intellectual work by misleading scholars, preying particularly early career researchers trying to gain an edge. The credibility of scholars duped into publishing in these journals can be seriously damaged by doing so. It is important that as a scholarly community we help to protect each other from being taken advantage of in this way.
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSaptarshi Ghosh
Research integrity means conducting research according to the highest professional and ethical standards, so that the results are trustworthy.
It concerns the behavior of researchers at all stages of the research life-cycle, including declaring competing interests; data collection and data management; using appropriate methodology; drawing conclusions from results; and writing up research findings.
In academia, the pressure to publish is high and the competition intense. This can lead authors to follow unethical publication practices, such as salami slicing, duplicate publication, and simultaneous submission. This slide deck explains these malpractices and shares tips on how authors can avoid them.
This is a presentation I gave to the Research Coordinators in the Federal Ministry of Health, Sudan (04.03.2015).
It included the following topics:
• Overview on the Knowledge Management Cycle and how research fits in it
• Brief historical background on research ethics
• What makes research ethical?
• Definition and examples of scientific misconduct
• How to make your research ethical and avoid scientific misconduct?
I explain plainly what is salami silcing, a practice of fragmenting single research into as many publications as possible. Salami publishing and hazards
Introduction to Altmetrics for Medical and Special LibrariansLinda Galloway
Altmetrics (or alternative citation metrics) provide new ways to track scholarly influence across a wide range of media and platforms. This presentation covers altmetric fundamentals, tips on connecting your users with altmetrics, and an overview of newly published research. Presented as part of the NN/LM MAR Boost Box Series; http://nnlm.gov/mar/training/boost_mar2014.pdf
In this presentation, the speaker has covered following topics:
What is scientific conduct?
What do we mean by ethics in research? – scientific temperament –
What is Ethical behavior in research?
How to practice Ethics in publication?
On Research Metrics -
Author level metrics to journal level metrics
Research Profile Digital Platforms.
Predatory Publications and Software Tools for IdentificationSaptarshi Ghosh
Journals that publish work without proper peer review and which charge scholars sometimes huge fees to submit should not be allowed to share space with legitimate journals and publishers, whether open access or not. These journals and publishers cheapen intellectual work by misleading scholars, preying particularly early career researchers trying to gain an edge. The credibility of scholars duped into publishing in these journals can be seriously damaged by doing so. It is important that as a scholarly community we help to protect each other from being taken advantage of in this way.
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSaptarshi Ghosh
Research integrity means conducting research according to the highest professional and ethical standards, so that the results are trustworthy.
It concerns the behavior of researchers at all stages of the research life-cycle, including declaring competing interests; data collection and data management; using appropriate methodology; drawing conclusions from results; and writing up research findings.
In academia, the pressure to publish is high and the competition intense. This can lead authors to follow unethical publication practices, such as salami slicing, duplicate publication, and simultaneous submission. This slide deck explains these malpractices and shares tips on how authors can avoid them.
This is a presentation I gave to the Research Coordinators in the Federal Ministry of Health, Sudan (04.03.2015).
It included the following topics:
• Overview on the Knowledge Management Cycle and how research fits in it
• Brief historical background on research ethics
• What makes research ethical?
• Definition and examples of scientific misconduct
• How to make your research ethical and avoid scientific misconduct?
I explain plainly what is salami silcing, a practice of fragmenting single research into as many publications as possible. Salami publishing and hazards
Introduction to Altmetrics for Medical and Special LibrariansLinda Galloway
Altmetrics (or alternative citation metrics) provide new ways to track scholarly influence across a wide range of media and platforms. This presentation covers altmetric fundamentals, tips on connecting your users with altmetrics, and an overview of newly published research. Presented as part of the NN/LM MAR Boost Box Series; http://nnlm.gov/mar/training/boost_mar2014.pdf
Infrastructure and practices for data citation have made substantial progress over the last decade. This increases the potential rewards for data publication and reproducible science, however overall incentives remain relatively weak.
authorsNote: This summarizes a presentation given at the *National Academies of Sciences* as part of [Data Citation Workshop: Developing Policy And Practice*](http://sites.nationalacademies.org/pga/brdi/index.htm) .
Panel: Our Scholarly Recognition System Doesn’t Still WorkDaniel S. Katz
A panel at the 2015 Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference
Organizers: Daniel S. Katz (U. of Chicago & Argonne National Laboratory), Amy Brand (Digital Science), Melissa Haendel (Oregon Health & Science University), Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski (Elsevier)
Panelists: Robin Champieux (Oregon Health & Science University) Holly Falk-Krzesinski (Elsevier)Daniel S. Katz (U. of Chicago & Argonne National Laboratory)Philippa Saunders (University of Edinburgh)
Abstract: http://bit.ly/scholarly-recognition
Scholarly Communications in Global PerspectiveNina Collins
Emerging scholars are often unprepared to navigate the changing landscape of scholarly publishing. Learn about author's rights and the importance of strategic publishing, including techniques to identify unethical scholarly publishers.
Academic Social Networks and Researcher RankingAmanyalsayed
Open science and web scholarly communication
Using Web 2.0 to increase researcher’s ranking
Academic Social Networks (types, services)
Question & Answer service
Sharing your research output through ASN
Researcher measurement (h-index, RG score)
ASN and researchers’ concerns
Communicating the impact of our research can be essential for securing funding, forming research partnerships, building a case for tenure and promotion, or achieving other goals. But what does “impact” really encompass, and how do we show evidence of it? This session will highlight key strategies, resources, and services that can help you to successfully communicate your research impact.
Presenter: Erin Owens, Professor and Scholarly Communication Librarian, Newton Gresham Library, Sam Houston State University
International Workshop on
"Information Management Tools for Academic and Research Libraries", All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society’s
College of Engineering, Pune – 1
18 to 22 December 2017 Lars Bjørnshauge
Agenda
- Research Assessment and Reward systems – an obstacle for the implementation of Open Access
- Questionable publishers – and how to detect them
- Improving the quality of journals published in India
- Whitelists!?
International Workshop on "Information Management Tools for Academic and Research Libraries", All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society’s College of Engineering, Pune – 1
18 to 22 December 2017 Lars Bjørnshauge
Basic statements about the current Scholarly Communication System.
The promises of Open Access!
Where are we now with Open Access?
DOAJ and what we do!
There are both challenges and opportunities in the existing scenario characterized by heavy emphasis on collaboration, digitization and onset of social media. One needs to be connected with theme, institution, industry and society. The web 2.0 technologies make it possible for a researcher to be a connected one.
Science Communication in the Light of INSA Policy Statement on "Dissemination...Anup Kumar Das
The presentation titled "Science Communication in the Light of INSA Policy Statement on "Dissemination and Evaluation of Research Output in India" was presented in 18th Indian Science Communication Congress (ISCC2018), celebrating 200 Years of Science Journalism in India, at NASC, New Delhi during 20-21 December 2018.
This is an updated version of an invited talk I presented at the European Research Council-Brussels (Scientific Seminar): "Love for Science or 'academic prostitution'".
It has been updated to be presented at my home institution (Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía - CSIC) in a scientific seminar (14 June 2013).
I have included some new slides and revised others.
I present a personal revision (sometimes my own vision) of some issues that I consider key for doing Science. It was focused on the expected audience, mainly Scientific Officers with background in different fields of science and scholarship, but also Agency staff.
Abstract: In a recent Special issue of Nature concerning Science Metrics it was claimed that " Research reverts to a kind of 'academic prostitution' in which work is done to please editors and referees rather than to further knowledge."If this is true, funding agencies should try to avoid falling into the trap of their own system. By perpetuating this 'prostitution' they risk not funding the best research but funding the best sold research.
Given the current epoch of economical crisis, where in a quest for funds researchers are forced into competitive game of pandering to panelists, its seems a good time for deep reflection about the entire scientific system.
With this talk I aim to provoke extra critical thinking among the committees who select evaluators, and among the evaluators, who in turn require critical thinking to the candidates when selecting excellent science.
I will present some initiatives (e.g. new tracers of impact for the Web era- 'altmetrics'), and on-going projects (e.g. how to move from publishing advertising to publishing knowledge), that might enable us to favor Science over marketing.
Open Access Publishing: An Author's PerspectiveLaura Gogia
A brief introduction to open access publishing for potential authors, presented at Virginia Commonwealth University's Open Access Week in November 2013.
Similar to Publication ethics: Definitions, Introduction and Importance (20)
Working in College Libraries: Opportunities and ChallengesVasantha Raju N
Talk delivered at the Friday Talk Series organized by the Mysore University Library & Information Science student Association (MULISSA), MyDLIS, University of Mysore on 29-12-2023
New Academic Publishing Models: Understanding PreprintsVasantha Raju N
New Academic Publishing Models: Understanding Preprints -Invited talk presented before the participants of LIS Refresher Course(RC) at the UGC-HRDC, University of Mysore on 11th Sept 2023.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
2. HELLO!
I am Vasantha Raju N.
Librarian
Government First Grade College-Talakadu
You can mail me at
vasanthrz@gmail.com
2
3. 3
What is Publication Ethics?
“the principles and standards associated with the process
of publishing the results of scientific research or scholarly
work in general.
These include such requirements as giving the appropriate credit
and authorship status to those who have earned it; ensuring that
appropriate citations are given to ideas, methodology, or findings
from another study; not submitting the same article to more than
one journal simultaneously; and not submitting results for
republication without indicating that they have already been
published elsewhere”
- APA Dictionary of Psychology
4. “ “Most people say that it is the
intellect which makes a great
scientist. They are wrong: it is
character.”
- Albert Einstein
4
7. Common Unethical Research & Publication Practice and
Retraction of Indian Literature
7
Source: Elango, B. (2021). Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors. Scientometrics, 126(5), 3965-3981.
8. • Authorship
An author is someone who has made a significant
contribution to the work reported: in terms of
research conception or design, or acquisition of
data, or the analysis and interpretation of data.
8
9. When Authorship Should be Given
According to the ICMJE following criteria should be met to be
credited as an author
▪ Substantial contribution to the study conception and design,
data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation.
▪ Drafting or revising the article for intellectual content
▪ Approval of the final version.
▪ Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work related
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work.
9
10. Authorship
▪ First Author
▫ One who conceptualizes the study and contributes immensely in
every aspects of the research process (study design, data
acquisitions, analysis, interpretations and writing the manuscript)
▪ Co-Authors
▫ Those who significantly contributes to the research work and in
preparing the manuscript
▪ Corresponding Author
▫ One who takes responsibility for the manuscript during the
submission, peer review and production process. All
communication from submission to publication will be with the
corresponding author.
10
13. Unethical Authorship Practices
▪ Guest Authorship
authorship based solely on
an expectation that
inclusion of a particular
name will improve the
chances that the study will
be published or increase the
perceived status of the
publication
▪ Gift Authorship
An author is added to a
paper when they have
not actually made a
contribution to the work,
perhaps to reward a
collaborator, return a
favour, or for some other
gain. Including PhD
supervisor or HoD, etc.
▪
▪ Ghost Authorship
This usually refers to
professional writers
(often paid by
commercial sponsors)
whose role is not
acknowledged.
13
14. • Plagiarism
One of the most common types of research misconduct
“The practice of taking someone else’s work or ideas
and passing them off as one’s own”
- The Oxford English Dictionary
- Derived from a Latin word “ Plagiarius”
- Meaning ‘kidnapper’
14
15. According to the Merriam-Webster online
dictionary, to "plagiarize" means:
▪ to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
▪ to use (another's production) without crediting the source
▪ to commit literary theft
▪ to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an
existing source
Plagiarism is nothing but an act of fraud. It involves both stealing
someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
15
18. UGC’s Penalties in case of plagiarism in academic
and research publications
▪ Level 0 : Similarities up to 10% - Minor similarities no penalty
▪ Level 1: Similarities above 10% to 40%
▫ Shall be asked to withdraw the manuscript
▪ Level 2 : Similarities above 40% to 60%
▫ Shall be asked to withdraw manuscript.
▫ Shall be denied a right to one annual increment.
▫ Shall not be allowed to be a supervisor to any new Master’s, M.Phil., Ph.D.
Student/scholar for a period of two years.
▪ Level 3: Similarities above 60 %
▫ Shall be asked to withdraw manuscript.
▫ Shall be denied a right to two successive annual increments.
▫ Shall not be allowed to be a supervisor to any new Master’s, M.Phil., Ph.D.
Student/scholar for a period of three years.
18
19. ▪ Simultaneous Submissions
▫ Submitting same manuscript in same or different
language(s) to one or more than one journal at the
same time.
▪ Duplication/Redundant Publications
▫ Duplicate publication is a form of redundant publication
where the same article is published more than once,
without acknowledging the first publication.
▪ Salami (Slicing) Publications
▫ Slicing single study into multiple fragments and
develop multiple papers out of it and submit it.
▪
19
These practices are prevalent in Indian academia for lack of awareness on
publication ethics and pressure to publish
20. • Conflict of Interest (Competing Interest)
Conflict of interest exist in research when an
individual (author, investigator, editor and reviewer)
has a specific interest, that could affect his/her
impartiality or maliciously influence his/her action.
20
Authors
Editors Reviewers
22. • Research Frauds
▪ Fabrication
▫ Making up research data and results, and recording or
reporting them
▪ Falsification
▫ manipulating research materials, images, data, equipment,
or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such
that the research is not accurately represented in the
research record.
22
Source: Elsevier Ethics in Research & Publication
24. • Predatory Journals
▪ Stop publishing in predatory journals
▪ Use appropriate indexing databases to select
good journals
▫ Web of Science (Woo's)
▫ Scopus
▫ PubMed
▫ DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
▫ Cabell’s Journal Analytics
▫ UGC-CARE List
24
25. Be Aware of Fake Journal Metrics
▪ Advanced Science Index
▪ Cosmos Impact Factor
▪ Directory of Journal Quality Factor
▪ Global Impact Factor
▪ IndexCopernicus
▪ International Scientific Indexing (ISI)
▪ Scientific Indexing Services (SIS)
▪ Universal Impact Factor, and other fake metrics
25
27. • Major International Organizations On Research
& Publication Ethics
27
COPE ( Committee on Publication Ethics )
WAME (World Association of Medical Editors)
ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journals & Editors)
CSE (Council of Science Editors)
EASE (European Association of Science Editors)
28. 28
Some of the Major Research Reporting Guidelines
Reporting
Guidelines
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-analyses)
CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)
STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of
OBservational studies in Epidemiology)
SRQR ( Standards for reporting qualitative research: a
synthesis of recommendations
MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in
Epidemiology)
STARD (STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic
accuracy studies)
Source: https://www.equator-network.org/
29. • Importance of Publication Ethics
▪ Enhance Institutions and Researchers Reputations
▪ Open Doors to Collaborations and Funding Body’s Interest
▪ Attract Young Researchers to Institutions/Labs
▪ Stop Waste of Resources (Time, Efforts and Money)
▪ Promotes Ethical Practices and Encourage Others to Follow
Suit
▪ Stop Dubious/Predatory Journals & Publishers
▪ Societal and Institutional Recognitions (Awards and
Accolades)
▪ Provide Facts and Figures to Counter Fake News/Narratives
29
30. • India’s Policy Interventions on Research Ethics
30
Source: Association of Publishers in India
31. • India’s Policy Interventions on Research Ethics
31
Source: Association of Publishers in India
32. Barriers in Scholarly Publishing
& How to Overcome this by adopting
Ethical Publication Practices
Using Open Science Platforms
32
34. Barriers Faced in Publishing Top LIS
Journals
34
Source: Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Shamsi, A., Abdullahi, J., Awojobi, E. A., Borgohain, D. J., ... & Yusuf, A. O. (2021).
Barriers to scholarly publishing among library and information science researchers: International perspectives. Information
Development, 02666669211052522.
35. Impact of COVID-19 on Scholarly Communications
35
Source: Miller, R. C., & Tsai, C. J. (2020). Scholarly Publishing in the Wake of COVID-19.
36. • Open Science Platforms
36
Open
Data
Repositories
Preprints
Open Peer
Review
Systems
Open
Educational
Resources
Open Access
Publications
Scientific
Social
Networks
Open Source
Citizen
Science
37. • Preprints
▪ “A preprint is a version of a scientific manuscript
posted on a public server prior to formal peer
review. As soon as it’s posted, your preprint
becomes a permanent part of the scientific record,
citable with its own unique DOI”
37
39. • Preprints Benefits
39
Rapid Dissemination of Research Results
Establishing Priority
Increased Attention (and Citations)
Career Advancement
Community
Unlimited and Timely Updates
42. • Open Data Repositories
Open research data refers to the data
underpinning scientific research results
that has no restrictions on its access,
enabling anyone to access it.
42
47. ▪ Make Research Publication freely available to everyone
which upholds the scientific integrity
▪ Increase the visibility of your research by having
researcher profile either in Google Scholar /WoS
Researcher ID/Scopus Author ID/ORCID
▪ Share Research results in Social Media Platforms
(Twitter/FB/blogs)
▪ Create Scientific Social Networking Profile (ResearchGate)
▪ Publish your Research in Preprints/ Open Access journals
▪ Publish your Research Outcomes in Local Languages
47