Elbow tendinopathy
update
Adam C Watts
Consultant Elbow Surgeon, Wrightington Hospital
Visiting Professor, University of Manchester
1
www.wrightington.com
Why is the elbow prone to
tendinopathy?
2
www.wrightington.com
Tendinopathies around the elbow
Lateral epicondylosis (Tennis
elbow)
Medial epicondylosis (Golfer’s
elbow)
Distal biceps tendinopathy
Distal triceps tendinopathy
3
decreasingincidence
www.wrightington.com
4
www.wrightington.com
5
www.wrightington.com
6
www.wrightington.com
7
www.wrightington.com
8
Pronator teres tendon origin
www.wrightington.com
Presentation
Insidious onset
Change in activity/
technique
9
Weekend warrior >>> club athlete > elite
www.wrightington.com
Clinical Diagnosis
10
www.wrightington.com
O’Driscoll hook test for distal biceps
11
www.wrightington.com 12
Assess whole kinetic chain
90% of tennis
players have
scapula dyskinesia
84% have GIRD
Lopez Vidriero, ESSKA 2016
www.wrightington.com
Assess whole patient!
- Psychological factors
Association between catastrophisation and tennis
elbow
Moderate association with distress
No relationship to kinesiophobia
13
www.wrightington.com
When to get plain radiographs
Younger and older
patients
Past history elbow
trauma
Mechanical symptoms
Positive grip and grind
14
important to exclude OCD in the young
www.wrightington.com
Is there a role for MRI?
15
www.wrightington.com
16
NormalTendinopathic
www.wrightington.com
What is a tendinopathy?
Chronic degenerative condition
Angiofibroblastic tendinosis
Myofibroblast proliferation
17
Still none the wiser!
www.wrightington.com
Normal Tendon
18
www.wrightington.com
19
www.wrightington.com
20
www.wrightington.com
Tendon Biology
Slow metabolism
Poor vascular supply
Neural elements
Tenocytes and mast cells
21
www.wrightington.com
Neurocellular Model Tendon Homeostasis
22
Proteases
Chemotactic
factors
www.wrightington.com
23
Nerve - Mast Cell Units
‘Normal’
physiological
loads
Tissue
Homeostasis
Exercise
- modest
overload
Functional
Adaptation
Overload
- acute
or chronic
Neurocellular
degeneration
www.wrightington.com
24
www.wrightington.com
Why does risk increase with age?
Crimping lost during adulthood
25
www.wrightington.com
26
www.wrightington.com
27
Ageing
Uncrimped fibres more sensitive to changes in load?
www.wrightington.com
4 stages of tendinopathy
28
www.wrightington.com
29
www.wrightington.com
Suggested Algorithm
30
www.wrightington.com
Eccentric loading for tendon dysrepair
Significant
improvement in
DASH score and
VAS pains score
when compared
to standard
treatment
31
www.wrightington.com
Eccentric Loading Distal Biceps
Biceps predominantly a supinator of forearm
32
www.wrightington.com
33
physiotherapy did not optimise long-term
outcome
short-term benefit in the absence of
corticosteroid injection
www.wrightington.com
34
Steroid Injection
Physiotherapy
www.wrightington.com
Is there any place for corticosteroids?
35
www.wrightington.com
Corticosteroids
Inhibit tenocyte proliferation
Inhibit tenocyte activity
Inhibit collagen synthesis
Increase tenocyte necrosis
36
www.wrightington.com
37
Steroid Injection
Physiotherapy
Natural History
www.wrightington.com
38
Danger of steroid injection
www.wrightington.com
Danger of steroid injection -
lateral ligament rupture (PLRI)
39
www.wrightington.com
Dose dependent tenocyte death
40
Autologous blood source
Concentrated platelet solution (2 to 8x normal)
PDGF, TGF, VEGF, FGF
www.wrightington.com
41
Platelet Rich Plasma
Mini GPS III Biomet
www.wrightington.com
Many systems - many differences
42
RegenLab
Selphyl
Arthrex ACP
www.wrightington.com
How does PRP work?
Stimulates an inflammatory process
Inflammation leads to healing
Is it organised healing?
43
www.wrightington.com
44
Platelet Rich Plasma - does it work?
100 Consecutive Patients
All had symptoms for > 6/12
No treatment for tennis elbow for 6/12
Randomised to PRP or 40mg Kenacort Injection
www.wrightington.com
45
Platelet Rich Plasma - does it work?
Steroid
PRP
Pain Score
PRP 73% Success
Steroid 51% Success
Follow Up (Weeks)
www.wrightington.com
46
PainScores
Platelet Rich Plasma - better than steroid
www.wrightington.com
47
PainScores
Platelet Rich Plasma - may not be
better than saline and needling
www.wrightington.com
PRP v Dry Needling
PRP superior to dry needling
At 6 months
84% success with PRP
68% with needling (p=0.012)
48
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul 3. [Epub ahead of print]
Platelet-Rich Plasma Significantly Improves Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Tennis Elbow: A Double-Blind, Prospective,
Multicenter, Controlled Trial of 230 Patients.
Mishra AK, Skrepnik NV, Edwards SG, Jones GL, Sampson S, Vermillion DA, Ramsey ML, Karli DC, Rettig AC.
www.wrightington.com
Autologous Whole Blood v PRP
Several RCTs
No convincing evidence of difference
49
www.wrightington.com
Efficacy v Effectiveness
often efficacy seen in RCT is not reproduced in clinical practice so it is important to study ‘real life’ effectiveness
50
Single shot ultrasound guided PRP (1ml, Biomet Recover Miniplatelet) under LA
Personal series 59 patients with recalcitrant tennis elbow with
minimum 6 month follow up
Mean age 52 (range 19 to 79 years)
Further intervention
3 repeat injections
9 operative intervention
“Success” rate of PRP injection 85%
www.wrightington.com
PRP and Distal Biceps
Case series
Improvement in pain scores and function
51
www.wrightington.com
How does PRP compare to surgery?
Prospective single blind RCT single shot PRP v
open surgery
100 patient recruited (17 withdrawn)
83 patients randomised (2 lost to follow up)
Analysis of 81 patients
52
Morgan B, Trail IA, Watts AC, Birch A, Nuttal D
Wrightington Upper Limb Unit
www.wrightington.com
Baseline data
53
www.wrightington.com
54
Pre 1.5 3 6 12
Time
QuickDASH
PRP
Surgery
www.wrightington.com
Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation
55
Pain Function Overall
No significant differences in outcome on any measure
www.wrightington.com
but…additional interventions
1 Surgical patient(3%) had a subsequent PRP
injection
13 PRP patients (31%) had surgery within 12 months
“Success” rate 95% for surgery v 69% for PRP
56
p=0.001
www.wrightington.com
Conclusion
No evidence yet that PRP is better than placebo
In practice at least 70% of patients treated with
PRP will avoid surgery
Useful second line treatment if no response to
physio?
57
www.wrightington.com
58
www.wrightington.com
Autologous cell implantation
Injection of functioning cells capable of
regenerating extracellular matrix
Autologous differentiated fibroblasts or tenocytes
or skin derived tenocyte like fibroblasts
Promising animal models
Early clinical trials promising
No good RCT
59
www.wrightington.com
Ultrasound driven percutaneous
tenotomy
60
www.wrightington.com
61
www.wrightington.com
62
www.wrightington.com
63
Advantages of Arthroscopic Tennis
Elbow Release
Better access to ECRB
Smaller Incisions = less post-operative pain
Treatment of associated intra-articular pathology
Earlier return to sports and work
www.wrightington.com
Superior DASH scores in arthroscopic group at
average 4 years follow-up
Excellent outcome
Open group 67%
Arthroscopic group 78%
64
www.wrightington.com
65
Wrong Diagnosis
Radiocapitellar plica
Posterolateral rotatory instability
Radial tunnel syndrome
Radiculopathy
www.wrightington.com
66
Remove trigger
NSAIDS?
Isometric exercises
Eccentric exercises
Injection
Surgery
www.wrightington.com
Where are we now?
67
Imaging
Insidious onset
No history trauma
Adult
History trauma
Adolescent
Elderly
Tendinopathy +/-
delamination
Analgesia
Activity modification
Physiotherapy -
eccentric loading
Tendinopathy +
macrotear/avulsion
Surgery
PRP injection
and physio
Initial Presentation
www.wrightington.com
Future research
Double blind randomised controlled trial
PRP v HA v sham injection
150 patients
Recruiting soon!
68

Elbow Tendinopathy