This document discusses ecological footprints and how they can be used to measure humanity's demand on the earth's resources. It provides several examples of how footprints are calculated for different activities, locations, and consumption levels. The document also addresses some common objections to the concept of ecological footprints and argues that while not a perfect measure, footprints help illustrate that humanity's current resource use is unsustainable and changes are needed to reduce our environmental impact.
This is the 7th lesson of the course - Foundation of Environmental Management taught at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
This presentation is about interdependence of man and environment. It highlights the environmental factors which contribute to the life of man. Further , it focuses on the factors which affect the weather and climate of Pakistan.
This is the 7th lesson of the course - Foundation of Environmental Management taught at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
This presentation is about interdependence of man and environment. It highlights the environmental factors which contribute to the life of man. Further , it focuses on the factors which affect the weather and climate of Pakistan.
Ecological Footprint assessment helps to identify what activities are having the biggest impact on nature and opens up possibilities to reduce our impact and live within the means of One Planet. It provides measurement of collective consumption of the population whether they are exceeding the Earth’s ecological limits or not. It is compared with Biocapacity which measures the amount of available bioproductive resources in ecosystem. The introduction of Ecological Footprint has been very necessary for the context of Bangladesh especially in Dhaka as the endless demand and the unplanned consumption pattern of the population here have been producing a very unsustainable situation.
The term "Natural resources" was first coined and popularized by E.F. Schumacher in the 1970's by his famous book “Small is Beautiful”. A natural resource can be defined as any substance that is present in nature independently of human industry and that is exploited in some or another way by humans. Forest, Water, Minerals, Food, Energy and Land are apparent examples because these are frequently utilized.
This is the introductory lesson of the course; 'Foundation of Environmental Management' taught at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
Ecological Footprint assessment helps to identify what activities are having the biggest impact on nature and opens up possibilities to reduce our impact and live within the means of One Planet. It provides measurement of collective consumption of the population whether they are exceeding the Earth’s ecological limits or not. It is compared with Biocapacity which measures the amount of available bioproductive resources in ecosystem. The introduction of Ecological Footprint has been very necessary for the context of Bangladesh especially in Dhaka as the endless demand and the unplanned consumption pattern of the population here have been producing a very unsustainable situation.
The term "Natural resources" was first coined and popularized by E.F. Schumacher in the 1970's by his famous book “Small is Beautiful”. A natural resource can be defined as any substance that is present in nature independently of human industry and that is exploited in some or another way by humans. Forest, Water, Minerals, Food, Energy and Land are apparent examples because these are frequently utilized.
This is the introductory lesson of the course; 'Foundation of Environmental Management' taught at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
2015 has been a very important year for humanity and the health of our planet. With your generous support, we made substantial strides advancing global sustainability in 2015. Click on the slideshow below for highlights from the year.
Important conceptual concerns, economic foundations of environmental valuation, scarcity, useful approaches for different environmental problems, and cautions.
John Dixon
Showing how Our Earth is moving towards the extinction, what is carbon foot print?, how can we contribute to reduce them at individual and global level and finally hoping for a safe and bright future.
This is the PowerPoint presentation I used to teach elementary and junior high students about renewable energy. I recommend at least 90 minutes for the presentation, in order to get the most participation and discussion out of the classroom.
Introduction to Permaculture - FELC February 8th 2014Vince Kirchner
Basic of permaculture provided to a group of Master Gardeners, and environmentally aware citizens. Key concepts were presented with a discussion around each topic. This is a precursor to a full PDC class starting in April. www.greatlakespermaculture.com
Conventional vs organic agriculture: Cornelia Harris, Cary Institute of Ecosy...Teaching the Hudson Valley
Part of THV's July 2014 institute, "Farms & Food: Teaching the Hudson Valley from the Ground Up." From a full-day field experience, "Our Ecosystem, Our Health: Exploring the Benefits of School & Community Gardens," in Poughkeepsie, NY. Particpiants visited gardens at Krieger ES, Poughkeepsie HS, and the Poughkeepsie Farm Project with Cornelia Harris, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, and Jamie Levato, education coordinator for the Poughkeepsie Farm Project.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
2. We Depend on Nature
• We exchange energy and
matter with our environment
as we
– Eat
– Drink
– Breathe
• We use
– Energy for heat and mobility
– Wood for housing and paper
– Food and water for living
3. We Depend on Nature
• Nature
– Absorbs our wastes
– Provides climate stability
– Protects us from ultraviolet
radiation
• In cities we tend to think of nature
as a collection of commodities we
obtain from around the world
• But nature is the very source of
our lives and well being
4. Ecological Footprints
• The amount of
ecologically
productive land
used by
individuals,
cities, countries,
etc.
• Production and
use of goods and
services involve
land use: have
ecological
footprints
9. Transportation Footprints
• If one person travels 5
kilometers twice each
workday:
– Bicycle: 122 sq
meters
– Buses : 301 sq meters
– Cars: 1,442 sq meters
10. Agricultural Footprints
• Open Field production of
tomatoes takes up more land
than greenhouse production
• But Greenhouse production
has a much larger ecological
footprint (10-20x)
– Energy
– Fertilizer
– Other inputs
11. Urban Footprints
• Imagine New York City
covered by a bubble like
Biosphere II in Arizona
• Most people would die
within a few days
• Cities depend on much
greater amount of land,
environment for vitalityhttp://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap970408.html
12. Urban Footprints
• Now imagine how big that
bubble would have to be
for the city to be
self-sustaining
• This is the ecological
footprint of the city
• Actually 347,000 square
miles
– to support 20 million in U.S.
lifestyle
– size of Texas and Oklahoma
combined.
13. National Footprints
• Holland population 15 million
• Density = 4.4 People per Hectare
• Consumption is less than in U.S.
• Still, Dutch people require 15x
more land than is within their
country for
– Food
– Forest Products
– Energy Use
• Therefore, the ecosystems that
support Holland lie far beyond
their national borders
14. National Footprints
• In U.S. each person uses about 4.5
hectares/person
• Worldwide average = 1.5 hectares/person
• Therefore if everybody were to adopt the U.S.
consumptive style, we would need 3 planets
15. Iowa Footprint
• Iowa Population is
2,776,000
• U.S. average footprint is
4.5 hectares/person
• Iowans need 12.5 million
hectares of average land to
support themselves
• Iowa area is 14.5 million
hectares
• Therefore we can support
at least another 444,000
Americans
16. Inequity
• We all compete for
ecologically overloaded
world
• Excess consumption by
affluent countries takes up
ecological footprint that
would be used by poorer
nations
http://www.thesavvytraveller.com/agraphics/insights/geography/1ge
neral/photoessays/dalusio_menzel/material_world.jpg
17. Resource Distribution
• Wealthiest 25% of the
world uses 75% of the
world’s resources
• If four people landed on an
island, could divide the
land up into 4 equal
sections, trade goods.
• Is it fair if one of those
people claims ¾ of the land,
forcing the other 3 to live
off of ¼ of the land?
18. Can everyone live like we do?
• No. There is not enough
earth to support it
• Thus all poor countries
cannot follow the miracle of
developed countries
• Someone must bear the
ecological burden of
consumption by the affluent
• Our continued over-
consumption hits the poor
hardest
19. Science Objection
• Footprint Analysis is a
crude simplification
• Interactions with
nature are complex
• Can’t reduce such
complexity to a mater
of hectares
20. Answer to Science
• Footprint analysis may not
tell whole story
• Is good enough to show us
what must be done
• Newtonian physics good
enough to get us to moon
• Avoid paralysis by analysis
• Footprints may actually
underestimate impact of
humans on environment
21. Marketplace Objection
• Global income is rising
faster than human
population
• Agricultural production is
responding to growing
demand
• Environmental problems
are due to poorly defined
property rights or prices
• If prices right, market will
solve problems
22. Answer to Marketplace
• Yes, when nature is
undervalued, it gets used
and abused
• Pollution charges and
depletion charges can be
useful to reduce
environmental damage
– Require Government
Intervention
• Footprint analysis may help
determine true costs
23. Answer to Marketplace
• Not everything in
nature should be
privatized or priced
– Stable Climate?
– Safe Ozone Level?
• Much of our
income today
derived from
liquidation of our
natural “capital”
26. Free Trade Objection
• Trade is beneficial, has improved
standard of living
• Let people in different parts of the
world do what they do best:
Comparative Advantage
– Coffee and Bananas from Developing
Countries
– Computers from Developed Countries
• Is also more economically efficient to
do what is more ecologically efficient
– Makes sense for tomatoes to be grown in
Mexico rather than in greenhouses in
Canada
27. Answer to Free Trade
• Economics looks at
money flow
• Footprint analysis looks
at Ecological flow
• Hong Kong, Switzerland,
Japan provide little
ecological productivity
to the world, draw a lot.
• Not everybody can be a
net importer
28. Answer to Free Trade
• Expanding economy
stimulates depletion of
planet’s natural
resources
• People who are using
Footprint resources far
from home have no
incentive to conserve
them
Indonesian Oil Palm
Plantation
29. Answer to Free Trade
• Intensive production
methods accelerate
depletion and pollution
• Economic benefits of
intensive production are
not equitably distributed
• Those who need income
displaced from land
• Profits from intensive Ag
go to those already well off.
30. Answer to Free Trade
• Global economy is pressing
ecological limits
• Poverty still affects 1 billion
people
• We don’t need “Free Trade”
• Need terms of trade that
– Encourage rehabilitation of
natural capital
– Direct benefits of export
activities to those who need
them
31. Uncertain Future Objection
• Prediction about the
future are always way off
• Can be sure the future
will be different from
what we expect
32. Answer to Uncertain Future
• Footprint Analysis is
not a predictive tool
• Is an “ecological
camera” that takes a
snapshot of our
current demands on
nature
• Extrapolation into
future really measures
sustainability gap”
USA at night from orbit
36. Answer to Uncertain Future
• Footprints also show
material inequity
• Footprints show us
how much we must
– reduce our
consumption
– improve technology
– change behavior to be
sustainable
37. Technology Fix Objection
• For hundreds of years
people have worried that
we would run out of
resources
• Technological revolution
has increased abundance
and lowered prices of goods
and services
• Thus one farmer produces
more than 200 farmers did
200 years ago
38. Technology Fix Objection
• Millions in N.
America better off
than kings and
queens in past due
to technology:
– Live more
comfortably
– Are healthier
– Feel more secure
– Eat betterhttp://www.thesavvytraveller.com/agraphics/insights/geography/1general/photoessays/dalusio_menzel/material_
world.jpg
39. Technology Fix Objection
• Computer revolution could not
be predicted
• We can’t anticipate future
benefits of genetic engineering
• When people faced with a
problem they come up with a
solution
– Medicine
– Transportation
– Communication
• We can fix any problem in the
future
40. Answer to Technology Fix
• Technology will play a role
in making society more
sustainable
• If global economy to be 10x
the size of today, we need
technology that makes us
10x more resource efficient
• Solar water heaters,
insulation reduce our
footprints and maintain
standard of living
41. Answer to Technology Fix
• Some technologies
substitute natural capital
for labor:
– Intensive Agriculture
• Gains in technology can
encourage consumption
– Efficient cars just used
more frequently!
– Despite efficiency gains,
energy consumption has
increased
Gas-Electric Hybrid Car
42. Optimism Objection
• Footprints are
depressing
• Apocalyptic visions
never come true
• Look on the bright
side!
What, me worry?
43. Answer to Optimism
• Acknowledging finite capacity of
Nature is not pessimistic: is realistic
• It allows wise decisions
• Footprint assumption: we must live
with global carrying capacity
– Number of people the earth can sustain
• If we choose wisely, may increase
quality of life
• Concerned that our life now is
destructive
• Sooner we start moving toward
sustainability, easier it will be for
humanity
44. Energy Production Objection
• Energy is driving force of
human enterprise
• With enough energy we can
do anything
– Clean up environment
– Irrigate Deserts
– Build fast transportation
networks
– Power highly productive
greenhouses
• Soon we will have unlimited
energy sources
– Fusion, Fission
– Tidal, Solar
45. Answer to Energy Production
• Sun = 175,000 terawatts shine
on earth
• Fossil fuels use =10 terawatts
• Imagine impact of unlimited
energy supply
• We’ve run down planet with
just 10 terawatts
• extended human activities may
produce new limiting factor:
Waste Assimilation
• Still, moving toward solar
energy would be good, would
reduce our footprint
46. What Should We Do?
• I asked the author of this
book what kind of
technology research he
thought the universities
should be doing
• Answer: Research to help
us reduce our ecological
footprint without reducing
our standard of living:
– sustainability