The document provides background information on Rome and its rise to power. It discusses Rome's strategic geographic location near the Mediterranean Sea with access to good farmland and protection from sea attacks. It describes the various peoples who inhabited Italy, including the Latin tribes and Etruscans who influenced early Rome. Key Roman virtues like patriotism and sacrifice for the state are outlined. The founding of Rome by Romulus and Remus is recounted. The document then covers Rome's establishment of a republic after overthrowing Etruscan kings, its expansion through military conquest across Italy, and the three Punic Wars against Carthage culminating in Rome's victory. Hannibal's invasion of Italy during the Second Punic War and
little book of BIG KNOWLEDGE rise &fall ROMAN EMPIREJANE HUDSON
The full rise and fall of the roman empire with maps I made this book to see what my work looks like so comments would be great as iv not finished I have worksheets to add and other exciting games.
little book of BIG KNOWLEDGE rise &fall ROMAN EMPIREJANE HUDSON
The full rise and fall of the roman empire with maps I made this book to see what my work looks like so comments would be great as iv not finished I have worksheets to add and other exciting games.
Cultural Geography of Russia. The cultural geography of Russia, includes relationship with NATO since the fall of the USSR. This vast nation stretches from Europe to the Pacific Ocean.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
2. The Impact of Geography
Center of Mediterranean
Sea.
Apennine Mountains easy
to cross.
Good farmland both sides.
3. The Impact of Geography
29 KM inland, safe
from sea people and
pirates, yet has sea
access.
4. The Peoples of Italy
Around 1500 BCE, the
Latin tribes, including
the Romans (a Indo-
European people)
moved into Italy.
5. The Peoples of Italy
By 800 BCE, the Etruscans conquered northern Italy.
By 700 BCE, the Greeks established polis in southern Italy.
Both influenced Rome.
6. Greek influence
Greek artistic and cultural knowledge like writing,
sculpture, architecture, gods, and literature.
8. Roman virtues
Gravities: seriousness and
dedication to family and state.
Extremely patriarchic “paterfamilias”
Self sacrifice for the good of the state.
Simple and plain lifestyle.
Practical knowledge more important then theoretical.
Strength and honor in war.
9. Legendary founding
Romulus and Remus ( twin sons of
Mars decedents of Aeneas of Troy)
raised by a she wolf along the Tiber
river.
10. Romulus and Remus
753 BCE, as Romulus
drew the boundaries of
the city, Remus
jumped over them.
So, Romulus killed
him and named the
city after himself.
11. 509 BCE Romans Revolt
Ruben’s Rape of Lucritia by King Tarquin
The Romans overthrew the
Etruscan king and established
a republic.
12. Rome’s Legions War and Conquest
For the next nine hundred years, Roman legionaries
engaged in almost continuous warfare.
15. By 260 BCE, they finished
off the remaining Etruscan
states of Northern Italy.
16. Roman Confederation
Rome allowed other Latins to have full Roman
citizenship.
They could vote in Rome and were protected by
Roman Law.
They could run their own local government, but had to
provide soldiers and follow Roman foreign affairs.
23. Roman social classes
Four social groups—
The patricians the great landowners, dominated
politics and the army.
The plebeians small business and landholders,
could vote and be in the army.
Proletariat poor , could not vote, or be in the army.
Slaves no rights.
24. Women were citizens, without strong political rights,
They had legal rights and owned their own business and
property.
Not confined to homes like Greeks.
26. The Roman Republic Checks and
Balances
No one part of the government could
hold absolute power.
3 parts
the executive
the legislative
and the judicial
27. Executive
Two consuls
elected annually
on March 1st by
the Legions.
Supervised the
government.
VETO (I forbid)
Command the armies
At end of year became a
member of Senate.
32. Praetors judges elected for life by Popular
Assembly
Approved by the Senate
Roman Laws written down
Judicial
33. Roman Law
created Law of Nations
principles still used today
A person is innocent until proved guilty.
People accused are allowed to defend themselves
before a judge.
A judge is expected to weigh evidence carefully before
making a decision
34. Roman Law
Codified laws: they wrote down the judges’ rulings,
laws, and organized them in books.
Law should be flexible and evolve with society.
Schools of law opened, producing lawyers.
38. 3 Punic Wars 264-146 BCE
Rome’s conquest brought
them in contact with the
State of Carthage.
39. 3 Punic Wars 264-146 BCE
Since 800 BCE, the Phoenician Carthage had a titanic
trading empire.
It was the largest and richest state in the area.
40. 3 Punic Wars 264-146 BCE
The First Punic War
began when Rome
sends an army into
Sicily.
Carthage declares war.
45. Romans
(Regulus/Manlius)
Carthaginians
(Hamilcar)
NN
Corvus
The Romans deploy in four squadrons in a compact mass with a leading wedge formation. Two squadrons comprise the leading wedge, Regulus commanding the left, Manlius
the right. A third squadron tows the transports just behind the wedge, followed by the veteran triarii squadron further to the rear. The Roman consuls plan to smash through any
enemy fleet and push on to North Africa. Hamilcar deploys his fleet in three groups; he commands the center while pushing two columns to his left and right out beyond the
Roman line. Hamilcar places the right wing under Hanno and gives him the fastest, most agile ships. Hamilcar plans to lure the Roman fleet in to engage the Carthaginian center
while the wings envelop and destroy the tight Roman mass.
Upon sighting the Carthaginian fleet, the Roman consuls do exactly as Hamilcar wants: hastily surge ahead to engage. Hamilcar turns the ships
at his center around to lead the Roman into the trap as his wings sail past the Roman leading wedge formation. However, the Roman squadron
towing the transports is not able to keep up with the Roman consuls’ squadrons, also slowing the triarii squadron down behind it; the result is a
significant gap between the leading and rear squadrons. The Roman rear squadrons veer right and left to try and form a line of battle.
Hamilcar
Manlius
Regulus
Hanno
Manlius
Hanno
Hamilcar orders the Carthaginian center to turn and engage the pursuing Roman squadrons as the Carthaginian wings bear down on their
intended targets, albeit further to the rear than anticipated. The third Roman squadron releases the transports in tow and maneuvers to hit the
Carthaginian left wing’s left flank. The transports head back to base although some get tied up with the triarii squadron; this disorders part of the
triarii squadron while the other part engages the Carthaginian right wing at a disadvantage..
The Carthaginian center is performing poorly against the Roman corvus, an ingenious boarding device, but is so far holding its position.
Meanwhile, the Roman right wing skilfully backs itself against the shore line, protecting its flanks and rear from the more agile Carthaginian ships
and deterring them with a frontage of corvi; this creates a stalemate on this sector. The Roman triarii squadron on the left finally disentangles
itself from the transports but is being outmanoeuvred and taking losses to the strong Carthaginian right wing under Hanno.
The Carthaginian center breaks and flees against Roman grappling and boarding tactics. Manlius’ squadron secures the many
captured ships while Regulus turns around to hit the Carthaginian right wing in rear and save the hard-pressed triarii squadron.
Meanwhile, the battle near the shore remains a stalemate with the Carthaginian ships unwilling to fully engage the Roman corvi.
Regulus
Hit in rear by Regulus, the Carthaginian right wing under Hanno breaks and flees. Regulus then leads his
squadron to hit the Carthaginian left wing in rear. Having secured the prizes, Manlius joins Regulus in surrounding
the Carthaginian left wing, which subsequently surrenders.
Manlius
Regulus
Romans
(Marcus Atilius Regulus/ Lucius
Manlius Vulso Longus)
230 quinqueremes
Carthaginians
(Hamilcar)
200 quinqueremes
The Romans were aware of their naval inferiority and
inexperience even before the First Punic War 264-241 BC, and
thus introduced a boarding device to make their grappling
tactics more effective. The corvus is comprised of a 1.2 by
10.9m wooden bridge with a metal spike at the end’s underside.
A pulley system drops the spike on the enemy’s deck, clasping
the two ships together, allowing Roman legionnaires to rush
across. The corvus thus converts Roman proficiency on land to
the sea battle.
57. Romans
(Sempronius)
Carthaginians
(Hannibal)
NN
Sempronius deploys his veteran legionnaire infantry in the center, flanked by his Gallic allied infantry and then his cavalry. Hannibal
deploys his infantry in a thin line in the center, flanked by his elephants and then his cavalry. He detaches a cavalry force under Mago
to remain unseen in a ravine near the Roman left and to only reveal his position at the most opportune time.
Sempronius sends his infantry forward in typical Roman fashion: steady and in good order. They dismiss the Carthaginian
elephants but are unable to decisively push the outnumbered Carthaginian infantry backwards. Meanwhile, Hannibal
counterattacks the Roman cavalry with his own and succeeds in bending back the Roman line by the flanks.
Hannibal transfers his elephants to his left and attacks; the Roman cavalry are defeated and now the Gallic allied infantry
guarding the Roman flanks come under attack. Mago emerges from hiding to sweep behind the Roman rear to complete
the encirclement. Meanwhile, the Roman infantry desperately batter the opposing Carthaginian infantry.
Hannibal becomes preoccupied with reducing the trapped Roman pocket by way of assaulting its flanks. Roman
infantry in the center are thus able to slice through the Carthaginian infantry line and escape along with
Sempronius himself. The remaining Roman units are annihilated fighting or drowned trying to escape.
Romans
(Tiberius Sempronius Longus)
36,000 infantry
4,000 cavalry
Carthaginians
(Hannibal Barca)
20,000 infantry
10,000 cavalry
2 war elephants
Mago
Hannibal
63. Romans
(Flaminius)
Carthaginians
(Hannibal)
Flaminius deploys his force in column formation, heavy infantry acting as an advance guard and cavalry as the
rearguard. Hannibal deploys an infantry unit in plain view of anyone entering the ravine to serve as bait and his
remaining force uphill out of sight to serve as the ambush.
NN
Romans
(Gaius Flaminius)
36,000 infantry
4,000 cavalry
Carthaginians
(Hannibal Barca)
22,000 infantry
8,000 cavalry
Flaminius orders the long column forward in the hopes of surprising the Carthaginian camp. Hannibal meanwhile
waits for the Roman column to be completely astride the lake and for the daily morning mist to shroud the Roman
soldiers’ vision.
The Roman advance guard vaguely spots the Carthaginian camp at the eastern end of the ravine and charges forward. It is now that Hannibal
springs the trap; the main Carthaginian force charges downhill with a thunderous cry. The cavalry sweep around the Roman rear to cut off any
retreat and then the infantry smash the Roman flanks. The Roman soldiers are blind to the disaster unfolding around them and can barely form
ranks to even fight.
The Romans do not recover from the initial shock and panic and are slaughtered along with their commander,
Flaminius. Only the advance guard and some lucky infantry are able to scatter into the mountains.
80. Romans
(Scipio)
Carthaginians
(Hannibal)
Laelius Masinissa
Tychaeus
Hannibal
Hannibal deploys his infantry in three lines with his hardened veterans occupying the rear line and his mercenaries and levies occupying the front two lines. He deploys his war
elephants and skirmishers in front of the infantry and the cavalry on the wings. Scipio deploys his infantry in three lines as well: hastati in the front, then principes and finally
veteran triarii. Scipio leaves wide lanes between his formations but hides the gaps with skirmishers. He deploys his cavalry on the wings, Masinissa commanding the stronger
right wing. Hannibal knows Scipio’s cavalry is superior and gives orders to his cavalry to lure the Roman cavalry far away from the battlefield if defeated.
Hannibal charges with his war elephants and skirmishers which are confronted by Roman skirmishers. As the war elephants approach the
Roman lines, Scipio orders the cavalry to blow loud horns to frighten the beasts which partly succeeds; many elephants turn about and flee. The
Carthaginian left wing is stampeded by rampaging elephants, completely disordering it. Masinissa promptly charges the Carthaginian left wing
and drives it from the field.
Frightened elephants continue to rampage into the Carthaginian ranks, disordering the right wing cavalry. Laelius also
seizes the opportunity to charge the Carthaginian right wing and drive it from the field. Meanwhile, Roman skirmishers
harass the remaining war elephants and carefully lure them down the wide lanes in the infantry to be destroyed in the rear.
Scipio
Scipio redresses his ranks to form a continuous battle line and advances. Hannibal meets the Roman infantry with
only his first two lines of infantry.
Romans
(Scipio Africanus)
29,000 infantry
6,500 cavalry
Carthaginians
(Hannibal Barca)
36,000 infantry
4,000 cavalry
NN
81. NN
Scipio
Hannibal
Scipio redresses his ranks to form a continuous battle line and advances. Hannibal meets the Roman infantry with
only his first two lines of infantry.
The Roman hastati eventually defeat the Carthaginian front infantry line which must retreat. However, Hannibal orders is second line
infantry to not allow the first line into their ranks resulting in a few initial skirmishes between friendly troops. Trapped between their
own second line and the Roman hastati, the Carthaginian front line is slaughtered although some escape to settle on the wings.
The Carthaginian second line counterattacks aggressively, pushing the Roman hastati backwards until reinforced by the principes. A fierce
struggle ensues but the Carthaginian infantry are again defeated and forced to retreat. Hannibal does not allow these troops to mingle with his
rear line but most have the sense to redeploy on the wings. Hannibal’s cavalry appears to be carrying out its orders magnificently as there is no
sign of the Roman cavalry.
Romans
(Scipio)
Carthaginians
(Hannibal)
Romans
(Scipio Africanus)
29,000 infantry
6,500 cavalry
Carthaginians
(Hannibal Barca)
36,000 infantry
4,000 cavalry
82. NN
Scipio
Triarii TriariiPrincipesHastatiPrincipes
Scipio and Hannibal pause briefly to reorganize their formations. Scipio leisurely deploys the principes on the inner wings
and the triarii on the outer wings for a balanced line which slightly overlaps the Carthaginian line. Hannibal knows an
advance over the corpse-filled battlefield would be difficult and opts to wait for Scipio to attack his veteran infantry line.
Scipio orders an advance over the gory battlefield. A violent and costly infantry struggle infantry ensues. Neither
side appears to be gaining an advantage and the decision remains in great doubt to both commanders.
As the infantry battle reaches a climax, the Roman cavalry finally return to attack the Carthaginians in the rear. In
an instant, the Carthaginian infantry are annihilated where they stand or violently pursued from the battlefield.
Hannibal
Romans
(Scipio)
Carthaginians
(Hannibal)
Romans
(Scipio Africanus)
29,000 infantry
6,500 cavalry
Carthaginians
(Hannibal Barca)
36,000 infantry
4,000 cavalry
90. Macedonians
(Perseus)
Romans
(Paullus)
NN
Paullus deploys alongside his experienced heavy infantry, the legionnaires, at the center. They are flanked by lighter infantry on each side, Greek allies on their left, Latin allies
on their right. Paullus places his few cavalry on each flank, and his war elephants on the right wing. Perseus deploys his compact infantry phalanx at the center. It is flanked by
lighter infantry on each side, mercenaries on its left, Thracians on its right. Perseus deploys an experimental anti-elephant unit opposite the Roman war elephants in the hopes of
neutralizing them; Perseus holds his cavalry back on each wing awaiting the result of this experiment, himself occupying a position on the right wing.
Perseus orders his infantry forward without committing his cavalry. The Thracians on the right surge ahead of the slow-moving phalanx to engage Paullus’
Greek allied infantry. The Macedonian phalanx advances gradually as a single mass, pinning down the Roman legionnaires and gaining an early advantage with
its long spears over their swords. The Pelignians, stationed with the Latin allied infantry, attempt a counter-attack – their commander resorting to tossing their
standard into the enemy ranks to incite them – but are repulsed with heavy loss and pushed back by the Macedonian mercenaries.
The Macedonian phalanx simply pushes the Roman legionnaires back, their long spears continuing to outrange the Roman sword. However, as
the Roman legionnaires fall back, the Macedonian phalanx becomes increasingly disordered as it advances over rough hilly terrain. The tight,
dense formation begins to show disruption and breaks in its cohesion; a gap between the phalanx and the left wing also widens as the Roman
war elephants prepare to enter the battle.
Paullus orders the legionnaires to break down into smaller units to infiltrate the disrupted phalanx though many of which are already doing so on their own
initiative. The Roman legionnaires exploit any and all gaps, forcing the Macedonian phalangites to drop their long spears and resort to their ineffective short
swords. The Roman attack is particularly effective on the phalanx’s exposed left flank. Paullus also orders a war elephant charge which routs the anti-elephant
corps and threatens the entire Macedonian left wing. With war elephants on the field, Perseus cannot commit his cavalry and influence the battle.
The Roman war elephants smash the Macedonian mercenaries, hitting their left flank and rear. Meanwhile, the Roman legionnaires
continue to slaughter the Macedonian phalangites as their formation disintegrates and routs; only a small unit of the phalanx
maintains its resolve and fights to the last. With the collapse of the phalanx, Perseus and the cavalry flee.
Macedonians
(Perseus)
21,000 phalangites
19,000 other infantry
4,000 cavalry
Romans
(Lucius Aemilius Paullus)
20,000 legionnaires
15,000 other infantry
2,000 cavalry
22 war elephants
92. Third Punic War 146BCE
For 10 days, Roman legions burned and demolished all
of the city’s buildings.
Population sold into slavery.
North Africa becomes a Roman province.
93. In 148 BCE, Rome made Macedonia into a province.
94. The new conquests of Rome were wars of plunder.
Provinces were stripped of wealth, the people often made
slaves, and leaders sent to Rome.