SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
FMP Evaluation
Caleb Wilcox
Production Process Evaluation
Research
• I believe on a whole my research worked well and effectively helped me to
decide upon the form that I wanted to be base my podcast upon. Once I had
decided upon on the idea of which I wanted to, I went into some more in depth
research based around the idea that I wanted to base my podcast upon. One
extreme strength I believe I had in my research was that, the form I wanted my
podcast to be based upon, as there are many different podcasts that have
already been produced in this form, so I had many different examples that I could
look at, which is a very good thing as it helped to expand my research more.
However this led me to spend too much time on my research as I kept listening to
different podcasts as they seemed to interest me and as a result of this I started
to fall behind ever so slightly.
Planning
• Within my planning I believe that I could have worked better with it, as I believe I
could have managed my time much better , as it was coming towards the end of
it I had rushed finishing it because I was running out off time and as a result
when it came to the end I rushed finishing it so I could hand it in on time.
• I believe that on a whole my planning did go well, as from my research I had
already thought of some idea of which I could base my planning ideas around
and off so when I started my planning I had already thought of some ideas of
which I could do for my production which was good and so got straight into
looking at the various potential ideas I had thought of and how I could create
them into my actual production.
• I believe to improve it I could of managed my time much better, when it came to
my planning and experiments as towards the end I started to run out off time to
complete my planning and experiment.
Time Management
• On a whole yes I do believe that I managed my time well, based on the time
within I completed all of my work, as I have nearly successfully handed all it in
and to a good standard. However when it comes too my time management on
individual things during my production, I feel that I could have managed my time
much more effectively and better and upon doing so I would have completed my
work at a much faster rate, unlike now , still having work from this project to
hand in.
• If I had more time I would have been able to hand my work and been able to
stick to the deadlines off my work and I also believe that I would have been able
to do it to a higher level.
Technical Qualities
• When it comes to comparing my work against already existing podcasts I believe
that my work is more off a stand out compared to other already existing
podcasts. For example if I compared my work to the BBC podcast ‘Tracing your
roots’, my podcast would appear out the two, to be the more interesting one as
my podcast features the idea off including sound effects in it, along with the idea
off the sound effects being repeated throughout my podcast, which helps to keep
the audience interested in my podcast. This is one of the main reasons which
makes me be of the opinion that my podcast is better than the BBC podcast
‘Tracing your roots’ I believe this because the BBC podcast doesn't feature any
sound effects/sound tracks, which could draw the audience away from being
interested in viewing it and go onto listening to something else that seems to be
of more interest, so something like my podcast, as its not just based around
sound effects, although its not as long I believe it is still more interesting to view.
Aural Qualities
• Yes I believe that my work sounds good and I also am of the opinion that it was
creative, although that it isn’t really that long I am still off the strong opinion
that it was a creative idea because of the style of which my podcast is based
around being upon, which is of memories about my dead granddad, this is seen
as a podcast being based around family history. Although some people may not
see it to be interesting enough, but I believe that it is interesting as in my eyes I
took courage from me and in particular to make my podcast upon favourite
memories of my Granddad. However one down side of the production is the fact
that, with my brother having been the one who was included in the voice
recordings at some points he stuttered which made it hard to edit it, as I had to
take some time to be able to edit out the parts where he made a mistake, as
when he did, he started talking again straight away so he didn’t leave a pause,
which made it difficult for me to be able to edit it down so that there wasn’t any
major errors or mistakes in it.
Audience Appeal
My product appeals to the audience because of the style upon it is based of being in which I
chose to create my podcast in and that was the style of it being more of a factual kind. To
appeal the audience of this kind I, took into account the things that I would ask my brother
to talk about, so that it would involve a sense of humor but not enough so that the audience
wouldn't take it to a level of extent that they would be offended by it. I tried to give the
audience a slightly wider perspective by involving the idea off having a tune at the start and
at the end off the podcast, as in my opinion it helped to not only widen but drawn in the
audience more, as it doesn't’t just include speech in it and the audience wont become bored
and listen to something else instead of my podcast, I aimed it so the audience will stay
intrigued within my podcast which will make them want too listen to it.
Based upon the specific area of my audience which my podcast is aimed at, which is being
more of the middle aged area, there is a reason that I chose my younger to brother to talk
about family memories as more middle aged/older people tend to believe that younger
people(children) are much more cuter and are more likely to listen to what they say, then of
what a 17 year old is going to say, regarding stories/memories.
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– I like the idea of how you have chosen to talk about a sensitive subject,
which makes people want to take their time to actually listen too it, rather
than them listening too something else.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– I believe that you could off taken more time with recording the audio, as it
sounds like it has been rushed in some parts it sounds as If the voice
recordings have been done last minute.
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– I enjoyed the idea off you including your family members, in particular your
younger brother in your podcast, as it gives your podcast a sense of It being
more personal which makes your podcast more likely to be taken seriously if
it is about family history.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– I believe that you could off made your podcast longer so that you could get a
higher mark from it and would seem to be more interesting.
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?I agree from my peer feedback that I should off made my
audio production clearer in some areas so that it was easier to hear in some
places, where there is still someone muffled background noise.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
– I disagree from my feedback that I should of made my podcast longer, as it is
already 2 minutes and 45 seconds long, I am of the opinion that it does not
need to be made longer as I believe that it is already sufficiently long enough
for a podcast and as so if I had off made it longer it would have of seemed
more like a radio interview.
Peer Feedback Summary
Upon after receiving my peer feedback, there is one main peer feedback
that I would make to my audio production is the idea that I would of taken
more time to have edited it down so that it would have sounded much more
clearer and so that then I would off had more chance of getting a higher
score. This I believe is one particular change that I would like to go back to
at one point to improve and get a higher score but at this time I am going to
have to leave it for now, but I will definitely be going back and taking some
more time to edit it down ad really focus into it more making sure that
every single background noise has been removed and then hopefully a
higher score will be achived.

More Related Content

What's hot

Project 7 - Evaluation
Project 7 -  EvaluationProject 7 -  Evaluation
Project 7 - EvaluationLukeNicholson6
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)ELLIPRINCE
 
Audio Project - Evaluation
Audio Project - EvaluationAudio Project - Evaluation
Audio Project - EvaluationDaisyPotter
 
Client Project: Evaluation
Client Project: EvaluationClient Project: Evaluation
Client Project: EvaluationEwanWild
 
7. evaluation(4)[1](1)
7. evaluation(4)[1](1)7. evaluation(4)[1](1)
7. evaluation(4)[1](1)Media Studies
 
7. evaluation fmp 2018
7. evaluation fmp 2018 7. evaluation fmp 2018
7. evaluation fmp 2018 Kieran Bradley
 
7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(audio)7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(audio)JoeFarrell32
 
Project 1 evaluation powerpoint
Project 1 evaluation powerpoint Project 1 evaluation powerpoint
Project 1 evaluation powerpoint thomasmoore143
 
6. evaluationn mv 2018
6. evaluationn mv 20186. evaluationn mv 2018
6. evaluationn mv 2018OliverKeppie
 
Short documentary evaluation
Short documentary evaluationShort documentary evaluation
Short documentary evaluationBaileyFurman
 

What's hot (19)

7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
Project 7 - Evaluation
Project 7 -  EvaluationProject 7 -  Evaluation
Project 7 - Evaluation
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
Audio Project - Evaluation
Audio Project - EvaluationAudio Project - Evaluation
Audio Project - Evaluation
 
Client Project: Evaluation
Client Project: EvaluationClient Project: Evaluation
Client Project: Evaluation
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
7. evaluation(4)[1](1)
7. evaluation(4)[1](1)7. evaluation(4)[1](1)
7. evaluation(4)[1](1)
 
7. evaluation fmp 2018
7. evaluation fmp 2018 7. evaluation fmp 2018
7. evaluation fmp 2018
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
Fmp evaluation
Fmp evaluationFmp evaluation
Fmp evaluation
 
7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(audio)7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(audio)
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
Project 1 evaluation powerpoint
Project 1 evaluation powerpoint Project 1 evaluation powerpoint
Project 1 evaluation powerpoint
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4) 7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
Evaluation copy
Evaluation copyEvaluation copy
Evaluation copy
 
6. evaluationn mv 2018
6. evaluationn mv 20186. evaluationn mv 2018
6. evaluationn mv 2018
 
Short documentary evaluation
Short documentary evaluationShort documentary evaluation
Short documentary evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
evaluation
evaluationevaluation
evaluation
 

Similar to 7. evaluation(4)

Similar to 7. evaluation(4) (20)

7. evaluation(4) dxd
7. evaluation(4) dxd7. evaluation(4) dxd
7. evaluation(4) dxd
 
7. evaluation(4)(2) (2)
7. evaluation(4)(2) (2)7. evaluation(4)(2) (2)
7. evaluation(4)(2) (2)
 
7. evaluation(7)
7. evaluation(7)7. evaluation(7)
7. evaluation(7)
 
7. fmp evaluation final
7. fmp evaluation final7. fmp evaluation final
7. fmp evaluation final
 
7. fmp evaluation final 2 1
7. fmp evaluation final 2 17. fmp evaluation final 2 1
7. fmp evaluation final 2 1
 
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)
 
8. evaluation (lf) audio
8. evaluation (lf) audio8. evaluation (lf) audio
8. evaluation (lf) audio
 
7. Evaluation(4).pptx
7. Evaluation(4).pptx7. Evaluation(4).pptx
7. Evaluation(4).pptx
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation submission
7. fmp evaluation submission 7. fmp evaluation submission
7. fmp evaluation submission
 
7. Evaluation (audio)
7. Evaluation (audio)7. Evaluation (audio)
7. Evaluation (audio)
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Unit 6 evaluation
Unit 6 evaluationUnit 6 evaluation
Unit 6 evaluation
 
7. Evaluation(4) (2).pptx
7. Evaluation(4) (2).pptx7. Evaluation(4) (2).pptx
7. Evaluation(4) (2).pptx
 
7. evaluation (fmp)
7. evaluation (fmp)7. evaluation (fmp)
7. evaluation (fmp)
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
FMP evaluation
FMP evaluation FMP evaluation
FMP evaluation
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
 

More from caleb wilcox

Presentation - PRESENTING WORK
Presentation - PRESENTING WORKPresentation - PRESENTING WORK
Presentation - PRESENTING WORKcaleb wilcox
 
Ual - UCAS POWERPOINT
Ual - UCAS POWERPOINTUal - UCAS POWERPOINT
Ual - UCAS POWERPOINTcaleb wilcox
 
Term 2 theory task
Term 2 theory taskTerm 2 theory task
Term 2 theory taskcaleb wilcox
 
Term 1 theory work
Term 1 theory workTerm 1 theory work
Term 1 theory workcaleb wilcox
 
FMP-Development diaries production
FMP-Development diaries productionFMP-Development diaries production
FMP-Development diaries productioncaleb wilcox
 
FMP-Development diaries
FMP-Development diariesFMP-Development diaries
FMP-Development diariescaleb wilcox
 
FMP-Production feedback (mid way production)
FMP-Production feedback (mid way production)FMP-Production feedback (mid way production)
FMP-Production feedback (mid way production)caleb wilcox
 
Fmp-planning and production
Fmp-planning and productionFmp-planning and production
Fmp-planning and productioncaleb wilcox
 
Fmp powerpoint-problem soliving n producion experiments
Fmp powerpoint-problem soliving n producion experimentsFmp powerpoint-problem soliving n producion experiments
Fmp powerpoint-problem soliving n producion experimentscaleb wilcox
 
Fmp task 1 research 1
Fmp task 1 research 1 Fmp task 1 research 1
Fmp task 1 research 1 caleb wilcox
 
Evaluation client work
Evaluation client work Evaluation client work
Evaluation client work caleb wilcox
 
Development diaries
Development diariesDevelopment diaries
Development diariescaleb wilcox
 
ideas and planning
ideas and planningideas and planning
ideas and planningcaleb wilcox
 
Fanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluationFanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluationcaleb wilcox
 

More from caleb wilcox (20)

Presentation - PRESENTING WORK
Presentation - PRESENTING WORKPresentation - PRESENTING WORK
Presentation - PRESENTING WORK
 
Caleb Wilcox - CV
Caleb Wilcox - CVCaleb Wilcox - CV
Caleb Wilcox - CV
 
Ual - UCAS POWERPOINT
Ual - UCAS POWERPOINTUal - UCAS POWERPOINT
Ual - UCAS POWERPOINT
 
Term 2 theory task
Term 2 theory taskTerm 2 theory task
Term 2 theory task
 
Term 1 theory work
Term 1 theory workTerm 1 theory work
Term 1 theory work
 
FMP- Evaluation
FMP- EvaluationFMP- Evaluation
FMP- Evaluation
 
FMP-Development diaries production
FMP-Development diaries productionFMP-Development diaries production
FMP-Development diaries production
 
FMP-Development diaries
FMP-Development diariesFMP-Development diaries
FMP-Development diaries
 
FMP-Production feedback (mid way production)
FMP-Production feedback (mid way production)FMP-Production feedback (mid way production)
FMP-Production feedback (mid way production)
 
Fmp-planning and production
Fmp-planning and productionFmp-planning and production
Fmp-planning and production
 
Fmp powerpoint-problem soliving n producion experiments
Fmp powerpoint-problem soliving n producion experimentsFmp powerpoint-problem soliving n producion experiments
Fmp powerpoint-problem soliving n producion experiments
 
Fmp task 1 research 1
Fmp task 1 research 1 Fmp task 1 research 1
Fmp task 1 research 1
 
Fmp proposal
Fmp proposalFmp proposal
Fmp proposal
 
Fmp pre proposal
Fmp pre proposalFmp pre proposal
Fmp pre proposal
 
Evaluation client work
Evaluation client work Evaluation client work
Evaluation client work
 
Development diaries
Development diariesDevelopment diaries
Development diaries
 
ideas and planning
ideas and planningideas and planning
ideas and planning
 
audience research
audience researchaudience research
audience research
 
research
researchresearch
research
 
Fanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluationFanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluation
 

Recently uploaded

Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhikauryashika82
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdfDisha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdfchloefrazer622
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...PsychoTech Services
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...christianmathematics
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...Sapna Thakur
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdfDisha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 

7. evaluation(4)

  • 3. Research • I believe on a whole my research worked well and effectively helped me to decide upon the form that I wanted to be base my podcast upon. Once I had decided upon on the idea of which I wanted to, I went into some more in depth research based around the idea that I wanted to base my podcast upon. One extreme strength I believe I had in my research was that, the form I wanted my podcast to be based upon, as there are many different podcasts that have already been produced in this form, so I had many different examples that I could look at, which is a very good thing as it helped to expand my research more. However this led me to spend too much time on my research as I kept listening to different podcasts as they seemed to interest me and as a result of this I started to fall behind ever so slightly.
  • 4. Planning • Within my planning I believe that I could have worked better with it, as I believe I could have managed my time much better , as it was coming towards the end of it I had rushed finishing it because I was running out off time and as a result when it came to the end I rushed finishing it so I could hand it in on time. • I believe that on a whole my planning did go well, as from my research I had already thought of some idea of which I could base my planning ideas around and off so when I started my planning I had already thought of some ideas of which I could do for my production which was good and so got straight into looking at the various potential ideas I had thought of and how I could create them into my actual production. • I believe to improve it I could of managed my time much better, when it came to my planning and experiments as towards the end I started to run out off time to complete my planning and experiment.
  • 5. Time Management • On a whole yes I do believe that I managed my time well, based on the time within I completed all of my work, as I have nearly successfully handed all it in and to a good standard. However when it comes too my time management on individual things during my production, I feel that I could have managed my time much more effectively and better and upon doing so I would have completed my work at a much faster rate, unlike now , still having work from this project to hand in. • If I had more time I would have been able to hand my work and been able to stick to the deadlines off my work and I also believe that I would have been able to do it to a higher level.
  • 6. Technical Qualities • When it comes to comparing my work against already existing podcasts I believe that my work is more off a stand out compared to other already existing podcasts. For example if I compared my work to the BBC podcast ‘Tracing your roots’, my podcast would appear out the two, to be the more interesting one as my podcast features the idea off including sound effects in it, along with the idea off the sound effects being repeated throughout my podcast, which helps to keep the audience interested in my podcast. This is one of the main reasons which makes me be of the opinion that my podcast is better than the BBC podcast ‘Tracing your roots’ I believe this because the BBC podcast doesn't feature any sound effects/sound tracks, which could draw the audience away from being interested in viewing it and go onto listening to something else that seems to be of more interest, so something like my podcast, as its not just based around sound effects, although its not as long I believe it is still more interesting to view.
  • 7. Aural Qualities • Yes I believe that my work sounds good and I also am of the opinion that it was creative, although that it isn’t really that long I am still off the strong opinion that it was a creative idea because of the style of which my podcast is based around being upon, which is of memories about my dead granddad, this is seen as a podcast being based around family history. Although some people may not see it to be interesting enough, but I believe that it is interesting as in my eyes I took courage from me and in particular to make my podcast upon favourite memories of my Granddad. However one down side of the production is the fact that, with my brother having been the one who was included in the voice recordings at some points he stuttered which made it hard to edit it, as I had to take some time to be able to edit out the parts where he made a mistake, as when he did, he started talking again straight away so he didn’t leave a pause, which made it difficult for me to be able to edit it down so that there wasn’t any major errors or mistakes in it.
  • 8. Audience Appeal My product appeals to the audience because of the style upon it is based of being in which I chose to create my podcast in and that was the style of it being more of a factual kind. To appeal the audience of this kind I, took into account the things that I would ask my brother to talk about, so that it would involve a sense of humor but not enough so that the audience wouldn't take it to a level of extent that they would be offended by it. I tried to give the audience a slightly wider perspective by involving the idea off having a tune at the start and at the end off the podcast, as in my opinion it helped to not only widen but drawn in the audience more, as it doesn't’t just include speech in it and the audience wont become bored and listen to something else instead of my podcast, I aimed it so the audience will stay intrigued within my podcast which will make them want too listen to it. Based upon the specific area of my audience which my podcast is aimed at, which is being more of the middle aged area, there is a reason that I chose my younger to brother to talk about family memories as more middle aged/older people tend to believe that younger people(children) are much more cuter and are more likely to listen to what they say, then of what a 17 year old is going to say, regarding stories/memories.
  • 10. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? – I like the idea of how you have chosen to talk about a sensitive subject, which makes people want to take their time to actually listen too it, rather than them listening too something else. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – I believe that you could off taken more time with recording the audio, as it sounds like it has been rushed in some parts it sounds as If the voice recordings have been done last minute.
  • 11. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? – I enjoyed the idea off you including your family members, in particular your younger brother in your podcast, as it gives your podcast a sense of It being more personal which makes your podcast more likely to be taken seriously if it is about family history. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – I believe that you could off made your podcast longer so that you could get a higher mark from it and would seem to be more interesting.
  • 12. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback?I agree from my peer feedback that I should off made my audio production clearer in some areas so that it was easier to hear in some places, where there is still someone muffled background noise. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? – I disagree from my feedback that I should of made my podcast longer, as it is already 2 minutes and 45 seconds long, I am of the opinion that it does not need to be made longer as I believe that it is already sufficiently long enough for a podcast and as so if I had off made it longer it would have of seemed more like a radio interview.
  • 13. Peer Feedback Summary Upon after receiving my peer feedback, there is one main peer feedback that I would make to my audio production is the idea that I would of taken more time to have edited it down so that it would have sounded much more clearer and so that then I would off had more chance of getting a higher score. This I believe is one particular change that I would like to go back to at one point to improve and get a higher score but at this time I am going to have to leave it for now, but I will definitely be going back and taking some more time to edit it down ad really focus into it more making sure that every single background noise has been removed and then hopefully a higher score will be achived.

Editor's Notes

  1. What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  2. What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  3. Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  4. Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
  5. Does your work sound good? Was it creative? What aspects of your product’s audio do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
  6. How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Make reference to specific recordings, dialogue, music and sound effects
  7. What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?