SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Download to read offline
SELF AND PEER
EVALUATION
OBJECTIVES
General objective
At the end of the lecture the students will be able to understand
the topic of self and peer evaluation and apply this knowledge in
Teacher Education
Specific objective…….. Students will be able to
1. Introduce the topic
2 Enlist the aims of the self and peer evaluation
3. Explain peer evaluation and enlist advantages and disadvantages
4 .Enumerate self evaluation and its advantages and disadvantages
INTRODUCTION
● Group work can be more successful when students are
involved in developing the evaluation process. This may
include establishing their own evaluation criteria through
consultation with teaching staff.
AIMS OF SELF AND PEER
EVALUATION
• Increase student responsibility and autonomy
• Strive for a more advanced and deeper understanding of
the subject matter, skills and processes
• lift the role and status of the student from passive learner to
active leaner and assessor
(this also encourages a deeper approach to learning)
• involve students in critical reflection
• develop in students a better understanding of their own
subjectivity and judgment
SELF EVALUATION
● Self-evaluation is a process which deals with the value of
self confidence. We should be aware of the fact that
working alone has its own value and importance though it
is often underrated. It is linked with introspection,
self-discovery and self-realization.
Cont..
● Learner evaluate himself in various forms, journalizing,
taking tests, writing revisions of work, asking questions,
and through discussions.
● When students evaluate themselves, they are assessing
what they know, do not know, and what they would like to
know. They begin to recognize their own strengths and
weaknesses. They become more familiar with their own
beliefs, and possibly their misconceptions.
● After they self-evaluate they will be able to set goals that
they feel they can attain with the new knowledge they
have about themselves.
Advantages:
● Self-evaluation is the first essential step in any evaluation process.
● It is an expected part of student professional performance and can
provide information useful for planning and student improvement.
● It helps teacher also to write evaluating various aspects of the
performance indicating their strength and weakness.
● It helps the teacher to get an opportunity to think, reflect and write
down the lack points.
● It helps the students to get a better idea of the goals that they are
trying to reach.
● Students can take responsibility for their own learning.
● student get a chance to predict their main targets for the coming year
and think about their career advancement.
Disadvantages
● Teacher feed back: Students can be undecided or if they
haven’t received enough feedback from the teacher, they
may have doubts regarding to the progress
● Consciousness: Students need to have a very high degree
of consciousness, so they can be able to analyze the errors
that they have made.
● Format based plan : Self-assessment can be very time
consuming, so as teachers we have to plan it before and
write an adequate format, so it doesn’t take students too
long to answer it, and so it is easy to check.
Cont..
● lack of maturity: Some students are not ready to
have a self-assessment task, mostly because they
aren’t aware of the seriousness or importance of the
process.
● Language : It implies knowledge about language and
learning which most second language learners don’t
have.
● Self-evaluation only works if students have been
trained to self-assess themselves.
●
PEER EVALUATION
● Students individually evaluated each other's contribution
using a predetermined list of criteria or may be evaluated
by teacher also.
● Grading is based on a predetermined process, but most
commonly it is an average of the marks awarded by
members of the group
Advantages:
● • Encourages student involvement and responsibility.
● • Encourages students to reflect on their role and
contribution to the process of the group Work.
● • Focuses on the development of student’s judgment skills.
● • Students are involved in the process and are encouraged
to take part ownership of this Process.
Cont..
● • Provides more relevant feedback to students as it is
generated by their peers.
● • It is considered fair by some students, because each
student is judged on their own Contribution.
● • When operating successfully can reduce a lecturer's
marking load.
● • Can help reduce the ‘free rider’ problem as students are
aware that their contribution will be graded by their peers.
Disadvantages:
● • Additional time can increase a lecturer’s workload.
● • Students will have a tendency to award everyone the
same mark.
● • Students feel ill equipped to undertake the assessment.
● • Students may be reluctant to make judgments regarding
their peers.
● • At the other extreme students may be discriminated
against if students ‘gang up’ against one group member.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.http://sydney.edu.au/education_social_work/groupwork/do
cs/SelfPeerevaluation.pdf
2.http://www.nclrc.org/essentials/assessing/peereval.htm
3. http://library.blackboard.com/.htm
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_evaluation

More Related Content

What's hot

self and peer. evaluation
self and peer. evaluationself and peer. evaluation
self and peer. evaluation
Naresh Soni
 
Summative and Formative Assessment
Summative and Formative AssessmentSummative and Formative Assessment
Summative and Formative Assessment
melostee
 

What's hot (20)

Concept of Classroom Assessment
Concept of Classroom AssessmentConcept of Classroom Assessment
Concept of Classroom Assessment
 
Reflective practice for teachers
Reflective practice for teachersReflective practice for teachers
Reflective practice for teachers
 
self and peer. evaluation
self and peer. evaluationself and peer. evaluation
self and peer. evaluation
 
Self-Evaluation
Self-EvaluationSelf-Evaluation
Self-Evaluation
 
Formative & summative evaluation
Formative & summative evaluationFormative & summative evaluation
Formative & summative evaluation
 
Formative and summative evaluation in Education
Formative and summative evaluation in EducationFormative and summative evaluation in Education
Formative and summative evaluation in Education
 
Micro Teaching
Micro TeachingMicro Teaching
Micro Teaching
 
Effective Classroom Management 30 slides
Effective Classroom Management 30 slidesEffective Classroom Management 30 slides
Effective Classroom Management 30 slides
 
Selecting Effective Teaching Strategies
Selecting Effective Teaching StrategiesSelecting Effective Teaching Strategies
Selecting Effective Teaching Strategies
 
Role of teaching in assessment.
Role of teaching in assessment.Role of teaching in assessment.
Role of teaching in assessment.
 
Learning outcomes
Learning outcomesLearning outcomes
Learning outcomes
 
UD -designing learner centered curriculum
UD -designing learner centered curriculumUD -designing learner centered curriculum
UD -designing learner centered curriculum
 
Types of Assessment
Types of AssessmentTypes of Assessment
Types of Assessment
 
Tools of assessment
Tools of assessmentTools of assessment
Tools of assessment
 
Assessment for learning
Assessment for learningAssessment for learning
Assessment for learning
 
Lesson plan Introduction
Lesson plan IntroductionLesson plan Introduction
Lesson plan Introduction
 
Nature of Assessment
Nature of AssessmentNature of Assessment
Nature of Assessment
 
Summative and Formative Assessment
Summative and Formative AssessmentSummative and Formative Assessment
Summative and Formative Assessment
 
Experience centered design
Experience centered designExperience centered design
Experience centered design
 
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced Evaluation
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced EvaluationNorms Referenced and Criteria Referenced Evaluation
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced Evaluation
 

Similar to Self reflection and peer evaluation.pptx

Module 8: Assessment and Evaluation
Module 8: Assessment and EvaluationModule 8: Assessment and Evaluation
Module 8: Assessment and Evaluation
Cardet1
 

Similar to Self reflection and peer evaluation.pptx (20)

Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based education
Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based educationTeaching learning techniques for effective outcome based education
Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based education
 
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402
 
PPT on curriculum
PPT on curriculumPPT on curriculum
PPT on curriculum
 
assessment for learning (1).pptx
assessment for learning (1).pptxassessment for learning (1).pptx
assessment for learning (1).pptx
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
TYPES OF ASSESSMENT.pptx
TYPES OF ASSESSMENT.pptxTYPES OF ASSESSMENT.pptx
TYPES OF ASSESSMENT.pptx
 
lesslesson2lesson2lesson2lesson2lesson2on2.pptx
lesslesson2lesson2lesson2lesson2lesson2on2.pptxlesslesson2lesson2lesson2lesson2lesson2on2.pptx
lesslesson2lesson2lesson2lesson2lesson2on2.pptx
 
202
202202
202
 
Teacher's hand out3rd 2 g evaluation meeting april 26th 2016
Teacher's hand out3rd 2 g  evaluation meeting april 26th 2016Teacher's hand out3rd 2 g  evaluation meeting april 26th 2016
Teacher's hand out3rd 2 g evaluation meeting april 26th 2016
 
Evaluation in the multigrade classroom
Evaluation in the multigrade classroomEvaluation in the multigrade classroom
Evaluation in the multigrade classroom
 
evaluationinthemultigradeclassroom-180215051805.pdf
evaluationinthemultigradeclassroom-180215051805.pdfevaluationinthemultigradeclassroom-180215051805.pdf
evaluationinthemultigradeclassroom-180215051805.pdf
 
Unit1Evaluation (2).pptx
Unit1Evaluation (2).pptxUnit1Evaluation (2).pptx
Unit1Evaluation (2).pptx
 
Learning about Assessment Literacy - Nicky Spawls and Clare O'Donoghue
Learning about Assessment Literacy - Nicky Spawls and Clare O'DonoghueLearning about Assessment Literacy - Nicky Spawls and Clare O'Donoghue
Learning about Assessment Literacy - Nicky Spawls and Clare O'Donoghue
 
EVALUATION OF SELF AND PEER NURSING EDUCATION.pptx
EVALUATION OF SELF AND PEER NURSING EDUCATION.pptxEVALUATION OF SELF AND PEER NURSING EDUCATION.pptx
EVALUATION OF SELF AND PEER NURSING EDUCATION.pptx
 
PPT -- CME -- On Being a Teacher in nursing.pptx
PPT -- CME -- On Being a Teacher in nursing.pptxPPT -- CME -- On Being a Teacher in nursing.pptx
PPT -- CME -- On Being a Teacher in nursing.pptx
 
Purposes of Classroom Assessment.Week 3.pptx
Purposes of Classroom Assessment.Week 3.pptxPurposes of Classroom Assessment.Week 3.pptx
Purposes of Classroom Assessment.Week 3.pptx
 
Purposes of Classroom Assessment.Week 3.pptx
Purposes of Classroom Assessment.Week 3.pptxPurposes of Classroom Assessment.Week 3.pptx
Purposes of Classroom Assessment.Week 3.pptx
 
Self-Evaluation & Peer Evaluation | Nursing Education | Juhin J
Self-Evaluation & Peer Evaluation | Nursing Education | Juhin JSelf-Evaluation & Peer Evaluation | Nursing Education | Juhin J
Self-Evaluation & Peer Evaluation | Nursing Education | Juhin J
 
ASSESSMENT.pptx
ASSESSMENT.pptxASSESSMENT.pptx
ASSESSMENT.pptx
 
Module 8: Assessment and Evaluation
Module 8: Assessment and EvaluationModule 8: Assessment and Evaluation
Module 8: Assessment and Evaluation
 

More from BEdEnglishEng (20)

Eye
EyeEye
Eye
 
Presentation (3)
Presentation (3)Presentation (3)
Presentation (3)
 
Doc 20180916-wa0004
Doc 20180916-wa0004Doc 20180916-wa0004
Doc 20180916-wa0004
 
Psychology
PsychologyPsychology
Psychology
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Presentation (6)
Presentation (6)Presentation (6)
Presentation (6)
 
Presentation (4)
Presentation (4)Presentation (4)
Presentation (4)
 
Presentation (3)
Presentation (3)Presentation (3)
Presentation (3)
 
Presentation (2)
Presentation (2)Presentation (2)
Presentation (2)
 
Presentation (1)
Presentation (1)Presentation (1)
Presentation (1)
 
Metric construction and interpretation(technology)
Metric construction and interpretation(technology)Metric construction and interpretation(technology)
Metric construction and interpretation(technology)
 
Warangkana s 1
Warangkana s 1Warangkana s 1
Warangkana s 1
 
Reshma technology 1
Reshma technology 1Reshma technology 1
Reshma technology 1
 
Reshma technology 1
Reshma technology 1Reshma technology 1
Reshma technology 1
 
Idealism word document 1
Idealism word document 1Idealism word document 1
Idealism word document 1
 
Contributions and limitations of idealism
Contributions and limitations of idealismContributions and limitations of idealism
Contributions and limitations of idealism
 
Idealism word document 1
Idealism word document 1Idealism word document 1
Idealism word document 1
 
Doc 20180810-wa0015
Doc 20180810-wa0015Doc 20180810-wa0015
Doc 20180810-wa0015
 
Cloud computing tutorial
Cloud computing tutorialCloud computing tutorial
Cloud computing tutorial
 
Psychology
PsychologyPsychology
Psychology
 

Recently uploaded

Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
AnaAcapella
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Introduction to TechSoup’s Digital Marketing Services and Use Cases
Introduction to TechSoup’s Digital Marketing  Services and Use CasesIntroduction to TechSoup’s Digital Marketing  Services and Use Cases
Introduction to TechSoup’s Digital Marketing Services and Use Cases
 
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
 
What is 3 Way Matching Process in Odoo 17.pptx
What is 3 Way Matching Process in Odoo 17.pptxWhat is 3 Way Matching Process in Odoo 17.pptx
What is 3 Way Matching Process in Odoo 17.pptx
 
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
 
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptAIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
 
dusjagr & nano talk on open tools for agriculture research and learning
dusjagr & nano talk on open tools for agriculture research and learningdusjagr & nano talk on open tools for agriculture research and learning
dusjagr & nano talk on open tools for agriculture research and learning
 
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptxREMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
UGC NET Paper 1 Unit 7 DATA INTERPRETATION.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Unit 7 DATA INTERPRETATION.pdfUGC NET Paper 1 Unit 7 DATA INTERPRETATION.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Unit 7 DATA INTERPRETATION.pdf
 
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptxHMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
 
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxCOMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
 
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
 
Model Attribute _rec_name in the Odoo 17
Model Attribute _rec_name in the Odoo 17Model Attribute _rec_name in the Odoo 17
Model Attribute _rec_name in the Odoo 17
 
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptxOn_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
 
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
Details on CBSE Compartment Exam.pptx1111
Details on CBSE Compartment Exam.pptx1111Details on CBSE Compartment Exam.pptx1111
Details on CBSE Compartment Exam.pptx1111
 
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & SystemsOSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
 
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdfFICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
 

Self reflection and peer evaluation.pptx

  • 2. OBJECTIVES General objective At the end of the lecture the students will be able to understand the topic of self and peer evaluation and apply this knowledge in Teacher Education Specific objective…….. Students will be able to 1. Introduce the topic 2 Enlist the aims of the self and peer evaluation 3. Explain peer evaluation and enlist advantages and disadvantages 4 .Enumerate self evaluation and its advantages and disadvantages
  • 3. INTRODUCTION ● Group work can be more successful when students are involved in developing the evaluation process. This may include establishing their own evaluation criteria through consultation with teaching staff.
  • 4. AIMS OF SELF AND PEER EVALUATION • Increase student responsibility and autonomy • Strive for a more advanced and deeper understanding of the subject matter, skills and processes • lift the role and status of the student from passive learner to active leaner and assessor (this also encourages a deeper approach to learning) • involve students in critical reflection • develop in students a better understanding of their own subjectivity and judgment
  • 5. SELF EVALUATION ● Self-evaluation is a process which deals with the value of self confidence. We should be aware of the fact that working alone has its own value and importance though it is often underrated. It is linked with introspection, self-discovery and self-realization.
  • 6. Cont.. ● Learner evaluate himself in various forms, journalizing, taking tests, writing revisions of work, asking questions, and through discussions. ● When students evaluate themselves, they are assessing what they know, do not know, and what they would like to know. They begin to recognize their own strengths and weaknesses. They become more familiar with their own beliefs, and possibly their misconceptions. ● After they self-evaluate they will be able to set goals that they feel they can attain with the new knowledge they have about themselves.
  • 7. Advantages: ● Self-evaluation is the first essential step in any evaluation process. ● It is an expected part of student professional performance and can provide information useful for planning and student improvement. ● It helps teacher also to write evaluating various aspects of the performance indicating their strength and weakness. ● It helps the teacher to get an opportunity to think, reflect and write down the lack points. ● It helps the students to get a better idea of the goals that they are trying to reach. ● Students can take responsibility for their own learning. ● student get a chance to predict their main targets for the coming year and think about their career advancement.
  • 8. Disadvantages ● Teacher feed back: Students can be undecided or if they haven’t received enough feedback from the teacher, they may have doubts regarding to the progress ● Consciousness: Students need to have a very high degree of consciousness, so they can be able to analyze the errors that they have made. ● Format based plan : Self-assessment can be very time consuming, so as teachers we have to plan it before and write an adequate format, so it doesn’t take students too long to answer it, and so it is easy to check.
  • 9. Cont.. ● lack of maturity: Some students are not ready to have a self-assessment task, mostly because they aren’t aware of the seriousness or importance of the process. ● Language : It implies knowledge about language and learning which most second language learners don’t have. ● Self-evaluation only works if students have been trained to self-assess themselves. ●
  • 10. PEER EVALUATION ● Students individually evaluated each other's contribution using a predetermined list of criteria or may be evaluated by teacher also. ● Grading is based on a predetermined process, but most commonly it is an average of the marks awarded by members of the group
  • 11. Advantages: ● • Encourages student involvement and responsibility. ● • Encourages students to reflect on their role and contribution to the process of the group Work. ● • Focuses on the development of student’s judgment skills. ● • Students are involved in the process and are encouraged to take part ownership of this Process.
  • 12. Cont.. ● • Provides more relevant feedback to students as it is generated by their peers. ● • It is considered fair by some students, because each student is judged on their own Contribution. ● • When operating successfully can reduce a lecturer's marking load. ● • Can help reduce the ‘free rider’ problem as students are aware that their contribution will be graded by their peers.
  • 13. Disadvantages: ● • Additional time can increase a lecturer’s workload. ● • Students will have a tendency to award everyone the same mark. ● • Students feel ill equipped to undertake the assessment. ● • Students may be reluctant to make judgments regarding their peers. ● • At the other extreme students may be discriminated against if students ‘gang up’ against one group member.