Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
1
2
Quality control tests of
semisolid products
Dr.Maryam kazemi
PhD student of pharmaceutics
Shiraz university of medical sciences
3
Lidocaine Ointment
• A. Infrared A bsorption
Sample: Stir a quantity of Ointment, equivalent to
300 mg of lidocaine, with 20 mL of water, transfer to a
separator, and extract with two 30-mL portions of solvent
hexane. Wash the combined hexane extracts with
10 mL of water, evaporate with the aid of a current of
warm air, and dry tne residue in vacuum over silica gel
for 24 h.
Acceptance criteria: The crystalline precipitate so obtained
meets the requirements.
R B. The retention time of the major peak of the Sample
solution corresponds to that of the Standard solution, as
obtained in the Assay.
4
Lidocaine OintmentASSAY
• Procedure
Solution A: 0.1% phosphoric acid, prepared by adding
1.0 mL of 85% phosphoric acid to 1 L of water.
Solution B: Acetonitrile
Diluent: Acetonitrile and Solution A (1:1)
System suitability solution: 0.1 mg/mL of USP Lidocaine
RS and 0.04 mg/mL of USP Ropivacaine Related
Compound A RS in Diluent
[Note—USP Ropivacaine Related Compound A RS is
2 , 6 -dimethylaniline hydrochloride.]
Standard solution: 0.1 mg/mL of USP Lidocaine RS in
Diluent
Sample solution: Nominally 0.1 mg/mL of lidocaine in
Diluent from a portion of Ointment. Sonicate the solution
for about 5 min.
Chromatographic system
(See Chromatography (621), System Suitability.)
Mode: LC
Detector: UV 210 nm
Column: 4.6-mm x 15-cm; 5-jjjti packing L1
Flow rate: 0.8 mL/min
Injection volume: 5 jiL
System suitability
Samples: System suitability solution and Standard
solution
[Note—The relative retention times for 2,6-dimethylaniline 5
.
and lidocaine are about 0.93 and 1.0,
respectively.]
Suitability requirements
Tailing factor: NMT 1.5 for the lidocaine peak, System
suitability solution
Relative standard deviation: NMT 2.0%, Standard
solution
Resolution: NLT 1.8 between lidocaine and 2,6-
dimethylaniline, System suitability solution
Analysis
Samples: Standard solution and Sample solution
Calculate the percentage of the labeled amount of lidocaine
(C14H22N2O) in the portion of Ointment taken:
Result = (ru//s) x (Cs/Cu) x 100
ru = peak response from the Sample solution
rs = peak response from the Standard solution
Q = concentration of USP Lidocaine RS in the
Standard solution (mg/mL)
Cu = nominal concentration of lidocaine in the
Sample solution (mg/mL)
Acceptance criteria: 95.0%-105.0%
6
Liquid or Semi-Solid Dosage Forms
Assay 10 units individually using an appropriate
analytical method. Carry out the assay on the
amount of well-mixed material
that is removed from an individual container in
conditions of normal use, and express the results
as delivered dose. Calculate
the acceptance value (see Table 2)
Uniformity of dosage form
7
• Calculation of Acceptance Value
• Calculate the acceptance value by the
formula:
• |M - x| + ks
8
Solid, Semi-Solid, and Liquid Dosage Forms
The requirements for dosage uniformity are met if the
acceptance value of the first 10 dosage units is less
than or equal to
L1%. If the acceptance value is > L1%, test the next 20
units, and calculate the acceptance value. The
requirements are met if
the final acceptance value of the 30 dosage units is <
LI %, and no individual content of ‘any, dosage unit is
less than [1 -
(0.01)(L2)]M nor more than [1 + (0.01)(L2)]M ‘ as
specified, in the Calculation of Acceptance Value
under Content Uniformity or
under *Weight4 Variation. Unless otherwise specified,
LI is 15.0 and L2 is 25.
9
SPECIFIC TESTS
• Microbial Enumeration tests and Tests
for Specified Microorganisms: It meets the
requirements of the tests for absence of
Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa.
10
Antioxidant content:
If antioxidants are present in the drug product,
tests of their content should be established unless
oxidative degradation can be detected by another
test method such as impurity testing. Acceptance
criteria for antioxidant
content should be established. They should be
based on the levels of antioxidant necessary to
maintain the product's stability
at all stages throughout its proposed usage and
shelf life.
11
Preservative effectiveness test
12
Table 1. Compendial product categories
13
• Candida albicans (ATCC No. 10231)
• Aspergillus niger (ATCC No. 16404)
• Escherichia coli (ATCC No. 8739)
• Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC No.9027)
• Estaphylococcus aureus (ATCC No. 6538)
Test organisms
14
• All the media used in this test must be tested
for growth promotion
Media
15
Table 2. Culture conditions for inoculum
preparations
16
• Category 1
Table 3. Criteria for antimicrobial effectiveness
test
17
• Category 2
Table 4. Criteria for antimicrobial effectiveness
test
18
• Category 3
Table 5. Criteria for antimicrobial effectiveness
test
19
• Category 4
Table 6. Criteria for antimicrobial effectiveness
test
20
pH:
When applicable, topically applied drug products
should be tested for pH at the time of batch
release and at designated
stability time points for batch-to-batch
monitoring. Because some topically applied drug
products contain very limited
quantities of water or aqueous phase, pH
measurements may not always be warranted. This
test is generally formulation dependent.
Therefore, it is not included in the compendial
drug product monograph but is part of the
manufacturer's specification
for the drug product.
21
Particle size:
The particle size of the active drug substance(s) in topically applied
drug products is usually determined and
controlled at the formulation development stage. However, topically
applied drug products should be examined for evidence
of particle size alteration (i.e., appearance of particles; changes in
particle form, size, shape, habit, or aggregation) of the active
drug substance that may occur during the course of product
processing and storage. Such examinations should be conducted
at the time of batch release and at designated stability test time
points for batch-to-batch monitoring because changes that
are visually (macro- and microscopically) observable would likely
compromise the integrity and/or performance of the drug
product. These types of tests are generally formulation dependent.
Therefore, such tests are not included in compendial monographs
but are part of the manufacturer specification for the drug product.
22
Water content:
Method la (Direct Titration)
The titrimetric determination of water is based upon the quantitative
reaction of water with an anhydrous solution
of sulfur dioxide and iodine in the presence of a buffer that reacts with
hydrogen ions.
Reagent—Prepare the Karl Fischer Reagent as follows. Add 125 g of
iodine to a solution containing 670 mL of methanol
and 170 mL of pyridine, and cool. Place 100 mL of pyridine in a 250-mL
graduated cylinder, and, keeping the pyridine cold in
an ice bath, pass in dry sulfur dioxide until the volume reaches 200
mL. Slowly add this solution, with shaking, to the cooled
iodine mixture. Shake to dissolve the iodine, transfer the solution to
the apparatus, and allow the solution to stand overnight before
standardizing. One mL of this solution when freshly prepared is
equivalent to approximately 5 mg of water, but it deteriorates
gradually; therefore, standardize it within 1 h before use, or daily if in
continuous use. Protect from light while in use.
23
Method lb (Residual Titration)
Principle—See the information given in the section
Principle under Method la. In the residual titration,
excess Reagent is added to the test specimen,
sufficient time is allowed for the reaction to reach
completion, and the unconsumed Reagent is
titrated with a standard solution of water in a solvent
such as methanol. The residual titration procedure is
applicable generally and avoids the difficulties that
may be encountered in the direct titration of
substances from which the bound water is released
slowly.
24
Method lc (Coulometric Titration)
Principle—The Karl Fischer reaction is used in the coulometric
determination of water. Iodine, however, is not added in the
form of a volumetric solution but is produced in an iodide-containing
solution by anodic oxidation. The reaction cell usually
consists of a large anode compartment and a small cathode
compartment that are separated by a diaphragm. Other suitable
types of reaction cells (e.g., without diaphragms) may also be used.
Each compartment has a platinum electrode that conducts
current through the cell. Iodine, which is produced at the anode
electrode, immediately reacts with water present in the compartment.
When all the water has been consumed, an excess of iodine occurs,
which usually is detected electrometrically, thus
indicating the endpoint. Moisture is eliminated from the system by
pre-electrolysis. Changing the Karl Fischer solution after
each determination is not necessary because individual
determinations can be carried out in succession in the same reagent
solution.
25
Test Preparation—Where the specimen is a
soluble solid, an appropriate quantity, accurately
weighed, may be dissolved in anhydrous methanol
or other suitable solvents. Where the specimen is
an insoluble solid, an appropriate quantity,
accurately weighed, may be extracted using a
suitable anhydrous solvent, and may be injected
into the anolyte solution. Alternatively, an
evaporation technique may be used in which
water is released and evaporated by heating the
specimen in a tube in a stream of dry inert gas.
The gas is then passed into the cell.
Where the specimen is to be used directly without
dissolving in a suitable anhydrous solvent, an
appropriate quantity, accurately weighed, may be
introduced into the chamber directly.
26
Viscosity
Rotational methods( apparent viscosity non
newtonian fluids & viscosity newtonian fluids)
1)Spindle viscometer
2)Concentric cylinder rheometer(cup and bob
rheometer)
3)Cone and plate rheometer
4)parallel plate rheometer
27
28
29
30
31
Determine apparent viscosities by changing the
shear rate (or shear stress, if using a controlled
shear stress rheometer) over a range appropriate
to the use of the material under
test. From a series of such viscosity
measurements, the relationship between the
shear rate and the shear stress of a non-
Newtonian liquid can be obtained.
32
33
some advantages of the parallel plate rheometer
include ease of sample loading
(especially tor very viscous liquids and soft
semisolids), and suitability for suspensions of
particulates.
34
Dissolution
• USP has recommended: the vertical diffusion
cell (Franz diffusion cells);the Immersion cell
with USP apparatus 2;and USP apparatus 4 with
a special adapter cell for in vitro release testing
of semisolid dosage forms
35
Vertical diffusion cell
Many vertical diffusion cell (VDC) systems are
composed of 6-cell units. Each VDC cell
assembly consists of two chambers (a
donor chamber and a receptor chamber)
separated by a membrane and held together by a
clamp, screw top, or other means.
The release rate experiment is carried out at 32
― 1 °, except in the case of vaginal drug
products for which thetemperature should be
37 + 1°. Usually a set of 6 cell assemblies are
operated together at one time
36
Sampling generally is performed over a 4-6 h
time period, and the volume withdrawn is
replaced with stock receptor medium. To
achieve sink condition, the receptor medium
must have a high capacity to dissolve the drug,
and the drug concentration in the receptor
medium at the end of the test ideally should
be as low as possible.
37
38
39
40
MODEL A
The thickness of the sample chamber normally is
1.5 mm. This thickness should be sized within
+10% of the specified thickness.
The glass support disk is used to occlude the
semisolid dosage form. A receptor cell mixer and
stirrer magnet are used as
the internal stirring mechanism.
MODELS B AND C
Classic styles of VDC are depicted in Figure 2 and
Figure 3 and illustrate minor design variations
among qualified models
41
Immersion cell
The immersion cell can be used with USP Apparatus Dissolution
with vessel volumes that vary from 100 mL up to 4 L, but the 150-
or 200-mL vessels are the most commonly used. A flat-bottom
variation of the 150- or 200-mL vessel can be used to avoid the
issue of dead space under the cell when it is used in a round-
bottom vessel. If analysts are going to use a 150- or 200-mL vessel
with USP Apparatus 2, then the appropriate modifications must
be made, including holders for the small-volume vessels and
replacement of the standard paddle with the appropriate paddle.
It also may require repositioning of any automated sampling
device and/or manifold. The water bath or vessel heater should
be set to have the medium temperature at 32.0 ― 0.5° or 37.0 .
42
43
44
45
Drug Release Rate Determination Using
Immersion Cell Apparatus
The cell consists of the following components
a retaining or lock ring that secures the membrane to the cell body
and ensures full contact with the sample; a washer that
provides a leakproof seal between membrane, retaining ring, and cell
body; the membrane (usually a synthetic membrane)
that should retain the sample in the sample compartment; and the
cell body that provides a variable depth reservoir for the
sample. Model A also has an adjustment plate that allows operators to
vary the volume of the reservoir within the cell body.
The plate can be placed at the appropriate height for each test and
can be completely removed to facilitate cleaning. An Oring
paired with the adjustment plate prevents leakage.
Uniformity in Containers
Carefully remove or cut off the bottom tube seal and
make a vertical cut from the bottom to the top of the
tube. Carefully cut the tube around the upper rim,
open the two flaps, and lay the flaps open to expose
the product.
Inspect the product visually for the presence of phase
separation, change in physical appearance and
texture, and other properties described in the product
test for Description. If there is no observable phase
separation or change in physical appearance
and texture, and if the product meets the Description
acceptance criteria, proceed as described in the
following sections. If the product exhibits phase
separation and/or change in physical appearance or
texture, the product fails the tube content
uniformity test.
46
For multiple-dose products that contain 5 g or more
Procedure 1
1. Using a single tube, after visually inspecting the product, remove an
appropriate amount of product from the top, middle,
and bottom portions of the tube. The sample size should be sufficient for at
least one quantitative determination of
the active ingredient(s). Determine the amount of the active ingredient(s) in
each portion of the product using any appropriate
validated quantitative procedure, and evaluate the test results using Acceptance
criteria A.
2. If the product fails Acceptance criteria A, test three additional tubes from the
same batch following step 1 described above,
and evaluate all 12 test results using Acceptance criteria B.
Procedure 2
1. Using two tubes, after visually inspecting the product, remove an appropriate
amount of product from the top, middle,
and bottom portions of each tube. The sample size should be sufficient for at
least one quantitative determination of the
active ingredient(s). Determine the amount of the active ingredient(s) in each
portion of the tube using any appropriate
validated quantitative procedure, and evaluate the test results using Acceptance
criteria A.
2. If the product fails Acceptance criteria A, test two additional tubes from the
same batch following step 1 described above,
and evaluate all 12 test results using Acceptance criteria B.
47
For multiple-dose products that contain less than 5 g of product
1. Test the top and bottom portions of two tubes using Procedure 7 or
Procedure 2 as described above. Evaluate the test
results using Acceptance criteria A.
2. If the product fails Acceptance criteria A, test two additional tubes
from the same batch following step 1 described above,
and evaluate all eight test results using Acceptance criteria B.
Tube (container) content uniformity test acceptance criteria: In
determining the relative standard deviation (RSD)
from multiple tubes, first determine the variance from the three
measurements for each tube and average across the tubes.
The RSD is calculated using this average variance.
Acceptance criteria A—All results are within the product assay range,
and the RSD is NMT 6% or as specified in the product
specification or in the compendial monograph. If the RSD is greater
than 6%, use Acceptance criteria B.
Acceptance criteria B—All results are within the product assay range,
and the RSD of the 12 assay results is NMT 6% or as
specified in the product specification or in the compendial
monograph.
48
PRODUCTS PACKAGED IN CONTAINERS OTHER
THAN TUBES
For semisolid products packaged in a container
other than a tube when the sampling method
presented previously cannot
be used, other sampling methods are acceptable,
such as the following one described for a jar.
1. Select a suitable syringe of sufficient length to
extend to the bottom of the container.
2. Remove and set aside the syringe plunger, and
cut off the bottom of the syringe barrel. Sampling
should take place from a location to the left/right
of the mid-line of the jar surface to preserve an
undisturbed region on the other side for any
additional investigation
49
50
3. Slowly push the syringe barrel into the container until it
reaches the bottom. Then, twist the syringe barrel containing
the
sample core, and remove the syringe from the container.
4. Insert the syringe plunger into the barrel, and carefully
extrude the sample core onto a clean surface in three equal
portions
to represent the top, middle, and bottom portions of the
container.
5. Remove an appropriate sample representative of the
middle section of the top, middle, and bottom portions of the
container
samples, and test according to the instructions outlined in
Products Packaged in Tubes.
51

Quality control of semisolids

  • 1.
    Click to editMaster title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Quality control testsof semisolid products Dr.Maryam kazemi PhD student of pharmaceutics Shiraz university of medical sciences 3
  • 4.
    Lidocaine Ointment • A.Infrared A bsorption Sample: Stir a quantity of Ointment, equivalent to 300 mg of lidocaine, with 20 mL of water, transfer to a separator, and extract with two 30-mL portions of solvent hexane. Wash the combined hexane extracts with 10 mL of water, evaporate with the aid of a current of warm air, and dry tne residue in vacuum over silica gel for 24 h. Acceptance criteria: The crystalline precipitate so obtained meets the requirements. R B. The retention time of the major peak of the Sample solution corresponds to that of the Standard solution, as obtained in the Assay. 4
  • 5.
    Lidocaine OintmentASSAY • Procedure SolutionA: 0.1% phosphoric acid, prepared by adding 1.0 mL of 85% phosphoric acid to 1 L of water. Solution B: Acetonitrile Diluent: Acetonitrile and Solution A (1:1) System suitability solution: 0.1 mg/mL of USP Lidocaine RS and 0.04 mg/mL of USP Ropivacaine Related Compound A RS in Diluent [Note—USP Ropivacaine Related Compound A RS is 2 , 6 -dimethylaniline hydrochloride.] Standard solution: 0.1 mg/mL of USP Lidocaine RS in Diluent Sample solution: Nominally 0.1 mg/mL of lidocaine in Diluent from a portion of Ointment. Sonicate the solution for about 5 min. Chromatographic system (See Chromatography (621), System Suitability.) Mode: LC Detector: UV 210 nm Column: 4.6-mm x 15-cm; 5-jjjti packing L1 Flow rate: 0.8 mL/min Injection volume: 5 jiL System suitability Samples: System suitability solution and Standard solution [Note—The relative retention times for 2,6-dimethylaniline 5
  • 6.
    . and lidocaine areabout 0.93 and 1.0, respectively.] Suitability requirements Tailing factor: NMT 1.5 for the lidocaine peak, System suitability solution Relative standard deviation: NMT 2.0%, Standard solution Resolution: NLT 1.8 between lidocaine and 2,6- dimethylaniline, System suitability solution Analysis Samples: Standard solution and Sample solution Calculate the percentage of the labeled amount of lidocaine (C14H22N2O) in the portion of Ointment taken: Result = (ru//s) x (Cs/Cu) x 100 ru = peak response from the Sample solution rs = peak response from the Standard solution Q = concentration of USP Lidocaine RS in the Standard solution (mg/mL) Cu = nominal concentration of lidocaine in the Sample solution (mg/mL) Acceptance criteria: 95.0%-105.0% 6
  • 7.
    Liquid or Semi-SolidDosage Forms Assay 10 units individually using an appropriate analytical method. Carry out the assay on the amount of well-mixed material that is removed from an individual container in conditions of normal use, and express the results as delivered dose. Calculate the acceptance value (see Table 2) Uniformity of dosage form 7
  • 8.
    • Calculation ofAcceptance Value • Calculate the acceptance value by the formula: • |M - x| + ks 8
  • 9.
    Solid, Semi-Solid, andLiquid Dosage Forms The requirements for dosage uniformity are met if the acceptance value of the first 10 dosage units is less than or equal to L1%. If the acceptance value is > L1%, test the next 20 units, and calculate the acceptance value. The requirements are met if the final acceptance value of the 30 dosage units is < LI %, and no individual content of ‘any, dosage unit is less than [1 - (0.01)(L2)]M nor more than [1 + (0.01)(L2)]M ‘ as specified, in the Calculation of Acceptance Value under Content Uniformity or under *Weight4 Variation. Unless otherwise specified, LI is 15.0 and L2 is 25. 9
  • 10.
    SPECIFIC TESTS • MicrobialEnumeration tests and Tests for Specified Microorganisms: It meets the requirements of the tests for absence of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 10
  • 11.
    Antioxidant content: If antioxidantsare present in the drug product, tests of their content should be established unless oxidative degradation can be detected by another test method such as impurity testing. Acceptance criteria for antioxidant content should be established. They should be based on the levels of antioxidant necessary to maintain the product's stability at all stages throughout its proposed usage and shelf life. 11
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Table 1. Compendialproduct categories 13
  • 14.
    • Candida albicans(ATCC No. 10231) • Aspergillus niger (ATCC No. 16404) • Escherichia coli (ATCC No. 8739) • Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC No.9027) • Estaphylococcus aureus (ATCC No. 6538) Test organisms 14
  • 15.
    • All themedia used in this test must be tested for growth promotion Media 15
  • 16.
    Table 2. Cultureconditions for inoculum preparations 16
  • 17.
    • Category 1 Table3. Criteria for antimicrobial effectiveness test 17
  • 18.
    • Category 2 Table4. Criteria for antimicrobial effectiveness test 18
  • 19.
    • Category 3 Table5. Criteria for antimicrobial effectiveness test 19
  • 20.
    • Category 4 Table6. Criteria for antimicrobial effectiveness test 20
  • 21.
    pH: When applicable, topicallyapplied drug products should be tested for pH at the time of batch release and at designated stability time points for batch-to-batch monitoring. Because some topically applied drug products contain very limited quantities of water or aqueous phase, pH measurements may not always be warranted. This test is generally formulation dependent. Therefore, it is not included in the compendial drug product monograph but is part of the manufacturer's specification for the drug product. 21
  • 22.
    Particle size: The particlesize of the active drug substance(s) in topically applied drug products is usually determined and controlled at the formulation development stage. However, topically applied drug products should be examined for evidence of particle size alteration (i.e., appearance of particles; changes in particle form, size, shape, habit, or aggregation) of the active drug substance that may occur during the course of product processing and storage. Such examinations should be conducted at the time of batch release and at designated stability test time points for batch-to-batch monitoring because changes that are visually (macro- and microscopically) observable would likely compromise the integrity and/or performance of the drug product. These types of tests are generally formulation dependent. Therefore, such tests are not included in compendial monographs but are part of the manufacturer specification for the drug product. 22
  • 23.
    Water content: Method la(Direct Titration) The titrimetric determination of water is based upon the quantitative reaction of water with an anhydrous solution of sulfur dioxide and iodine in the presence of a buffer that reacts with hydrogen ions. Reagent—Prepare the Karl Fischer Reagent as follows. Add 125 g of iodine to a solution containing 670 mL of methanol and 170 mL of pyridine, and cool. Place 100 mL of pyridine in a 250-mL graduated cylinder, and, keeping the pyridine cold in an ice bath, pass in dry sulfur dioxide until the volume reaches 200 mL. Slowly add this solution, with shaking, to the cooled iodine mixture. Shake to dissolve the iodine, transfer the solution to the apparatus, and allow the solution to stand overnight before standardizing. One mL of this solution when freshly prepared is equivalent to approximately 5 mg of water, but it deteriorates gradually; therefore, standardize it within 1 h before use, or daily if in continuous use. Protect from light while in use. 23
  • 24.
    Method lb (ResidualTitration) Principle—See the information given in the section Principle under Method la. In the residual titration, excess Reagent is added to the test specimen, sufficient time is allowed for the reaction to reach completion, and the unconsumed Reagent is titrated with a standard solution of water in a solvent such as methanol. The residual titration procedure is applicable generally and avoids the difficulties that may be encountered in the direct titration of substances from which the bound water is released slowly. 24
  • 25.
    Method lc (CoulometricTitration) Principle—The Karl Fischer reaction is used in the coulometric determination of water. Iodine, however, is not added in the form of a volumetric solution but is produced in an iodide-containing solution by anodic oxidation. The reaction cell usually consists of a large anode compartment and a small cathode compartment that are separated by a diaphragm. Other suitable types of reaction cells (e.g., without diaphragms) may also be used. Each compartment has a platinum electrode that conducts current through the cell. Iodine, which is produced at the anode electrode, immediately reacts with water present in the compartment. When all the water has been consumed, an excess of iodine occurs, which usually is detected electrometrically, thus indicating the endpoint. Moisture is eliminated from the system by pre-electrolysis. Changing the Karl Fischer solution after each determination is not necessary because individual determinations can be carried out in succession in the same reagent solution. 25
  • 26.
    Test Preparation—Where thespecimen is a soluble solid, an appropriate quantity, accurately weighed, may be dissolved in anhydrous methanol or other suitable solvents. Where the specimen is an insoluble solid, an appropriate quantity, accurately weighed, may be extracted using a suitable anhydrous solvent, and may be injected into the anolyte solution. Alternatively, an evaporation technique may be used in which water is released and evaporated by heating the specimen in a tube in a stream of dry inert gas. The gas is then passed into the cell. Where the specimen is to be used directly without dissolving in a suitable anhydrous solvent, an appropriate quantity, accurately weighed, may be introduced into the chamber directly. 26
  • 27.
    Viscosity Rotational methods( apparentviscosity non newtonian fluids & viscosity newtonian fluids) 1)Spindle viscometer 2)Concentric cylinder rheometer(cup and bob rheometer) 3)Cone and plate rheometer 4)parallel plate rheometer 27
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
    Determine apparent viscositiesby changing the shear rate (or shear stress, if using a controlled shear stress rheometer) over a range appropriate to the use of the material under test. From a series of such viscosity measurements, the relationship between the shear rate and the shear stress of a non- Newtonian liquid can be obtained. 32
  • 33.
  • 34.
    some advantages ofthe parallel plate rheometer include ease of sample loading (especially tor very viscous liquids and soft semisolids), and suitability for suspensions of particulates. 34
  • 35.
    Dissolution • USP hasrecommended: the vertical diffusion cell (Franz diffusion cells);the Immersion cell with USP apparatus 2;and USP apparatus 4 with a special adapter cell for in vitro release testing of semisolid dosage forms 35
  • 36.
    Vertical diffusion cell Manyvertical diffusion cell (VDC) systems are composed of 6-cell units. Each VDC cell assembly consists of two chambers (a donor chamber and a receptor chamber) separated by a membrane and held together by a clamp, screw top, or other means. The release rate experiment is carried out at 32 ― 1 °, except in the case of vaginal drug products for which thetemperature should be 37 + 1°. Usually a set of 6 cell assemblies are operated together at one time 36
  • 37.
    Sampling generally isperformed over a 4-6 h time period, and the volume withdrawn is replaced with stock receptor medium. To achieve sink condition, the receptor medium must have a high capacity to dissolve the drug, and the drug concentration in the receptor medium at the end of the test ideally should be as low as possible. 37
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    MODEL A The thicknessof the sample chamber normally is 1.5 mm. This thickness should be sized within +10% of the specified thickness. The glass support disk is used to occlude the semisolid dosage form. A receptor cell mixer and stirrer magnet are used as the internal stirring mechanism. MODELS B AND C Classic styles of VDC are depicted in Figure 2 and Figure 3 and illustrate minor design variations among qualified models 41
  • 42.
    Immersion cell The immersioncell can be used with USP Apparatus Dissolution with vessel volumes that vary from 100 mL up to 4 L, but the 150- or 200-mL vessels are the most commonly used. A flat-bottom variation of the 150- or 200-mL vessel can be used to avoid the issue of dead space under the cell when it is used in a round- bottom vessel. If analysts are going to use a 150- or 200-mL vessel with USP Apparatus 2, then the appropriate modifications must be made, including holders for the small-volume vessels and replacement of the standard paddle with the appropriate paddle. It also may require repositioning of any automated sampling device and/or manifold. The water bath or vessel heater should be set to have the medium temperature at 32.0 ― 0.5° or 37.0 . 42
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
    45 Drug Release RateDetermination Using Immersion Cell Apparatus The cell consists of the following components a retaining or lock ring that secures the membrane to the cell body and ensures full contact with the sample; a washer that provides a leakproof seal between membrane, retaining ring, and cell body; the membrane (usually a synthetic membrane) that should retain the sample in the sample compartment; and the cell body that provides a variable depth reservoir for the sample. Model A also has an adjustment plate that allows operators to vary the volume of the reservoir within the cell body. The plate can be placed at the appropriate height for each test and can be completely removed to facilitate cleaning. An Oring paired with the adjustment plate prevents leakage.
  • 46.
    Uniformity in Containers Carefullyremove or cut off the bottom tube seal and make a vertical cut from the bottom to the top of the tube. Carefully cut the tube around the upper rim, open the two flaps, and lay the flaps open to expose the product. Inspect the product visually for the presence of phase separation, change in physical appearance and texture, and other properties described in the product test for Description. If there is no observable phase separation or change in physical appearance and texture, and if the product meets the Description acceptance criteria, proceed as described in the following sections. If the product exhibits phase separation and/or change in physical appearance or texture, the product fails the tube content uniformity test. 46
  • 47.
    For multiple-dose productsthat contain 5 g or more Procedure 1 1. Using a single tube, after visually inspecting the product, remove an appropriate amount of product from the top, middle, and bottom portions of the tube. The sample size should be sufficient for at least one quantitative determination of the active ingredient(s). Determine the amount of the active ingredient(s) in each portion of the product using any appropriate validated quantitative procedure, and evaluate the test results using Acceptance criteria A. 2. If the product fails Acceptance criteria A, test three additional tubes from the same batch following step 1 described above, and evaluate all 12 test results using Acceptance criteria B. Procedure 2 1. Using two tubes, after visually inspecting the product, remove an appropriate amount of product from the top, middle, and bottom portions of each tube. The sample size should be sufficient for at least one quantitative determination of the active ingredient(s). Determine the amount of the active ingredient(s) in each portion of the tube using any appropriate validated quantitative procedure, and evaluate the test results using Acceptance criteria A. 2. If the product fails Acceptance criteria A, test two additional tubes from the same batch following step 1 described above, and evaluate all 12 test results using Acceptance criteria B. 47
  • 48.
    For multiple-dose productsthat contain less than 5 g of product 1. Test the top and bottom portions of two tubes using Procedure 7 or Procedure 2 as described above. Evaluate the test results using Acceptance criteria A. 2. If the product fails Acceptance criteria A, test two additional tubes from the same batch following step 1 described above, and evaluate all eight test results using Acceptance criteria B. Tube (container) content uniformity test acceptance criteria: In determining the relative standard deviation (RSD) from multiple tubes, first determine the variance from the three measurements for each tube and average across the tubes. The RSD is calculated using this average variance. Acceptance criteria A—All results are within the product assay range, and the RSD is NMT 6% or as specified in the product specification or in the compendial monograph. If the RSD is greater than 6%, use Acceptance criteria B. Acceptance criteria B—All results are within the product assay range, and the RSD of the 12 assay results is NMT 6% or as specified in the product specification or in the compendial monograph. 48
  • 49.
    PRODUCTS PACKAGED INCONTAINERS OTHER THAN TUBES For semisolid products packaged in a container other than a tube when the sampling method presented previously cannot be used, other sampling methods are acceptable, such as the following one described for a jar. 1. Select a suitable syringe of sufficient length to extend to the bottom of the container. 2. Remove and set aside the syringe plunger, and cut off the bottom of the syringe barrel. Sampling should take place from a location to the left/right of the mid-line of the jar surface to preserve an undisturbed region on the other side for any additional investigation 49
  • 50.
  • 51.
    3. Slowly pushthe syringe barrel into the container until it reaches the bottom. Then, twist the syringe barrel containing the sample core, and remove the syringe from the container. 4. Insert the syringe plunger into the barrel, and carefully extrude the sample core onto a clean surface in three equal portions to represent the top, middle, and bottom portions of the container. 5. Remove an appropriate sample representative of the middle section of the top, middle, and bottom portions of the container samples, and test according to the instructions outlined in Products Packaged in Tubes. 51