The document outlines plans for vertical collaborative teams. The key objectives are to determine guidelines for how collaborative time is used, continue developing instruction plans using learning from previous meetings, and review expectations and provide feedback. Teams will participate in sharing, develop core plans, and review feedback. Future meetings will focus on developing instruction units and formative assessments aligned with learning outcomes. District PD in January and February will support these goals for different subject areas.
The document provides guidance for developing formative and summative assessments aligned to learning targets, including generating assessment options, developing rubrics and checklists, incorporating accommodations and differentiation, and using assessment data to inform instruction. Teachers are instructed to work in groups to design assessments, provide feedback on each other's work, and develop a blog to share their learning about assessment.
Teaching UE4 With Quest Based Learning Dr Cynthia MarcelloUnreal Engine
This document discusses using Quest-Based Learning (QBL) to teach Unreal Engine 4. QBL uses game mechanics like quests to engage students in a non-linear learning path. Students can choose quests that suit their learning style and progress at their own pace. The document outlines how to design quests aligned to learning outcomes and map them to difficulty levels in UE4. Best practices include using tools like GitHub and Trello for project management. Student feedback indicates QBL provides flexibility and motivates time management.
I planned the induction to last over six months. We started before school with a two day (mostly) intensive, then had an hour and a half session once a month until December.
The document describes Bloom's taxonomy, a classification of learning objectives into cognitive domains originally published in 1956 and revised in 2001. It provides the six major categories in the cognitive domain: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create. For each category, it defines the skills involved and provides question verbs and learning examples. It also references similar frameworks for the affective and psychomotor domains created by other researchers.
Classification of educational objectiveszunara-sabir
The document discusses the classification of educational objectives into three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. It provides detailed descriptions and examples of levels within the cognitive domain, including knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Sub-categories and action verbs are provided for each level. The document also discusses objectives related to the affective and psychomotor domains.
The document summarizes the agenda and discussions from a Career Development division office board room meeting on June 7, 2012. The agenda covered topics like a career fair follow-up, assessment reflections, influencer training, CD portfolios, resources, changes within the CD team, and future focus areas. It provided context around building the CD program through continued initiatives, middle level career education, and exploring partnerships. The meeting aimed to celebrate successes, reflect on challenges, and strategize next steps in supporting students' career development.
This syllabus outlines an 8-week course on organizational culture that examines fundamental concepts, theories, models, and analyses. Students are required to purchase two textbooks, complete weekly discussion forums and assignments. Assignments include analyzing an organization using Schein's Organizational Culture Inventory tool, comparing the cultures of effective and ineffective organizations, and developing a cultural assessment and personal development plan as a future organizational leader. The goal is for students to understand how organizational culture impacts effectiveness and how leaders can shape culture.
This document provides tips for conducting asynchronous and synchronous online assessment. It discusses establishing clear criteria and objectives, building a learning community, considering quality of participation, and dealing with ambiguity. It notes both benefits and difficulties of synchronous assessment, emphasizing that it should be student-focused and based on constructivism. The document concludes by outlining activities to conclude an online course, such as parting gifts where students share what they learned, and reflecting on the most important thing learned.
The document provides guidance for developing formative and summative assessments aligned to learning targets, including generating assessment options, developing rubrics and checklists, incorporating accommodations and differentiation, and using assessment data to inform instruction. Teachers are instructed to work in groups to design assessments, provide feedback on each other's work, and develop a blog to share their learning about assessment.
Teaching UE4 With Quest Based Learning Dr Cynthia MarcelloUnreal Engine
This document discusses using Quest-Based Learning (QBL) to teach Unreal Engine 4. QBL uses game mechanics like quests to engage students in a non-linear learning path. Students can choose quests that suit their learning style and progress at their own pace. The document outlines how to design quests aligned to learning outcomes and map them to difficulty levels in UE4. Best practices include using tools like GitHub and Trello for project management. Student feedback indicates QBL provides flexibility and motivates time management.
I planned the induction to last over six months. We started before school with a two day (mostly) intensive, then had an hour and a half session once a month until December.
The document describes Bloom's taxonomy, a classification of learning objectives into cognitive domains originally published in 1956 and revised in 2001. It provides the six major categories in the cognitive domain: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create. For each category, it defines the skills involved and provides question verbs and learning examples. It also references similar frameworks for the affective and psychomotor domains created by other researchers.
Classification of educational objectiveszunara-sabir
The document discusses the classification of educational objectives into three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. It provides detailed descriptions and examples of levels within the cognitive domain, including knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Sub-categories and action verbs are provided for each level. The document also discusses objectives related to the affective and psychomotor domains.
The document summarizes the agenda and discussions from a Career Development division office board room meeting on June 7, 2012. The agenda covered topics like a career fair follow-up, assessment reflections, influencer training, CD portfolios, resources, changes within the CD team, and future focus areas. It provided context around building the CD program through continued initiatives, middle level career education, and exploring partnerships. The meeting aimed to celebrate successes, reflect on challenges, and strategize next steps in supporting students' career development.
This syllabus outlines an 8-week course on organizational culture that examines fundamental concepts, theories, models, and analyses. Students are required to purchase two textbooks, complete weekly discussion forums and assignments. Assignments include analyzing an organization using Schein's Organizational Culture Inventory tool, comparing the cultures of effective and ineffective organizations, and developing a cultural assessment and personal development plan as a future organizational leader. The goal is for students to understand how organizational culture impacts effectiveness and how leaders can shape culture.
This document provides tips for conducting asynchronous and synchronous online assessment. It discusses establishing clear criteria and objectives, building a learning community, considering quality of participation, and dealing with ambiguity. It notes both benefits and difficulties of synchronous assessment, emphasizing that it should be student-focused and based on constructivism. The document concludes by outlining activities to conclude an online course, such as parting gifts where students share what they learned, and reflecting on the most important thing learned.
The document discusses the stages teachers go through when adapting to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in mathematics - denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. It then provides an overview of the CCSS introduction, math practices, and six key shifts in mathematics - focus, coherence, fluency, deep understanding, application, and dual intensity. Teachers are guided to reflect on how these shifts impact their instruction and what students will experience in the classroom.
The “Course Topics” series from Manage Train Learn and Slide Topics is a collection of over 4000 slides that will help you master a wide range of management and personal development skills. The 202 PowerPoints in this series offer you a complete and in-depth study of each topic. This presentation is on "The Facilitator's Toolkit".
This document discusses reflection, peer observation, and the UK Professional Standards Framework (UK PSF) in the context of a teaching development module. It introduces the concepts and importance of reflective practice, peer observation, and the UK PSF for professional development in higher education. It outlines intended learning outcomes related to discussing experiential learning, recognizing the value of peer observation, examining the UK PSF, explaining reflective practice, and developing a strategy to embed reflection. The document provides information on reflection models and cycles, conducting peer observations, and using reflection to enhance teaching practice.
Student perception of collaborative small group projects using synchronous an...David Wicks
This session will report on findings from a three-year study that explored how different communication tools may impact small group collaborative learning projects in an online course. The primary goal of this session is to share successful techniques for organizing and facilitating small group collaborative projects in online and blended courses.
This document outlines a training curriculum that aims to help participants become better trainers. It covers five units: 1) Understanding adult learners, 2) Playing the role of a trainer, 3) Optimizing diversity among trainees, 4) Providing engaging facilitation, and 5) Assessment. The curriculum maps learning outcomes, topics, activities and assessments. It provides examples and tasks for participants to apply principles like catering to different thinking styles and leveraging trainees' experiences. The goal is for participants to learn how to design effective training that considers characteristics of adult learners and diversity.
The document discusses the stages teachers may go through when adapting to the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. It outlines the stages of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. It then provides information on the Common Core math practices, the six shifts in mathematics under Common Core, and focuses on shifts around focus, coherence, and fluency. Key aspects are ensuring depth of understanding, connecting concepts across grades, and developing fluency in core skills.
This document provides guidance for completing assignments for a Western Civilization course. It outlines the steps to understand and break down assignments, including understanding what is being asked, identifying key concepts, and determining how the assignment will be evaluated. It also provides an example assignment, detailing specific requirements for three papers, including formatting guidelines, submission process, feedback options, due dates, and penalties for late submissions.
The document provides presenter notes for leading a workshop on Keeping Learning on Track (KLT) Foundations, outlining the goals of introducing teachers to formative assessment strategies and how their learning will continue through job-embedded professional learning communities. It describes the agenda and activities for the workshop, emphasizing formative assessment techniques to model such as using parking lots for questions, learning targets, and traffic light signals to check understanding. Presenters are guided to facilitate discussions and activities to help teachers understand how to implement formative assessment in their classrooms.
This document outlines the process and stages of teacher inquiry (jugyou kenkyuu) where groups of teachers work together to plan, execute, and evaluate lessons. The stages include:
1. Planning - Teachers define a problem or theme, make a comprehensive lesson plan that incorporates curriculum priorities, and discuss potential issues or changes.
2. Implementation - One teacher implements the experimental lesson while others observe and collect data on different aspects like classroom management, student-teacher interaction, and the overall learning process.
3. Reflection - After the lesson, teachers meet to share observations, reflect on and evaluate the lesson plan and its implementation, examining elements like the theme, materials, instructional methods, and teacher
This document summarizes the process of implementing the Common Core State Standards in a California school district. It discusses establishing what the standards are, why they are needed, and how teachers will meet their demands. Early adopters signed on to pilot the standards and received training. The process involved deconstructing each standard, identifying vocabulary, and creating units, tasks, and rubrics. Challenges included the work required and preparing students, but benefits included increased collaboration and rigor. Ongoing support for teachers was crucial.
Taking differentiation by learning profile to the next levelJeremy
The document discusses differentiating instruction based on student learning profiles. Teachers collect data on student preferences like learning styles and intelligence preferences. When differentiating for learning profile, teachers vary topics, activities, and products. The goal is for students to have choice in how they demonstrate their understanding as long as they meet the learning goals. Teachers should balance opportunities for students to work in preferred and non-preferred ways.
This document discusses reflection and peer observation in teaching. It introduces the UK Professional Standards Framework (UK PSF) and emphasizes the importance of reflective practice and continuing professional development for teachers in higher education. It outlines the goals of discussing experiential learning, recognizing the value of peer observation, examining the UK PSF, explaining the importance of reflection, and developing strategies to embed reflection in teaching practice. The document provides information on conducting peer observations and reflective practice, including Gibbs' reflective cycle model. It emphasizes deepening reflection by linking experiences to theory and exploring options for future action.
Evaluation techniques of teaching: focus groups and Nominal Group TechniqueTünde Varga-Atkins
Slides accompanying a 90-min SEDA workshop on 15th Nov 2012.
Credit to Tunde Varga-Atkins, Jaye McIsaac and Ian Willis, University of Liverpool.
It is the first time we have introduced our new, combined approach for gathering student feedback on teaching. The method can also be used in other contexts such as curriculum review or development.
The Nominal Group Technique is akin to focus groups, but with more structure and an immediate, quantitative output. Our approach has been to combine two stages: stage 1, focus group, followed by stage 2: nominal group. We have found this an effective approach at the University of Liverpool.
The document outlines ways teachers can differentiate instruction for students at different readiness levels, including using varied texts, scaffolding, grouping arrangements, homework options, and assessment. Readiness refers to a student's entry point or current understanding of a topic. Teachers can provide support for students
Write to learn sye workshop january 15 2013Ed Nagelhout
This document discusses using writing effectively in second-year experience courses. It begins by asking why instructors should use student writing and what types of writing assignments they can have students complete. Examples of short writing assignments that can be done in class are provided, such as knowledge probes, minute papers, and concept maps. The document then discusses how to integrate these informal writings and manage the workload for instructors. Suggestions are given for scaffolding assignments, using rubrics, responding to writing in process, and not getting caught up in copyediting. The document concludes by discussing developing formal writing assignments and planning a sequence of activities to meet learning objectives and requirements for pages of writing.
This document provides an introduction to leadership and outlines a 45 minute activity to help participants gain an understanding of the nature of teacher leadership. The activity involves reflections, discussions, and a presentation on developing leadership at different levels including teachers, administrators, higher education, and mathematics and science centers. The goal is to help representatives and leaders in STEM and education better understand leadership development.
The document discusses reflection and peer observation in the context of a professional graduate certificate in academic practice (PGCAP) module. It introduces the UK professional standards framework (PSF) and emphasizes the importance of reflective practice and continuing professional development within higher education. Key points covered include discussing experiential learning and reflection to enhance teaching practice, recognizing the value of peer observation, and examining the UK PSF and its relevance for professional growth. Reflective writing and developing a strategy to embed reflection in one's own teaching are highlighted as important outcomes.
- The document discusses using reflective practice to improve teaching, specifically for information literacy educators.
- It explores key theories on reflection, including reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action. Reflection provides a way to actively think about and improve one's professional development.
- Practical skills and tools for reflective practice are presented, including reflective writing, discussion, and using a pedagogic planner to design inquiry-based learning experiences and identify areas for improvement.
Designing Online Resources to Enhance In-Class InteractionsNITLE
The document discusses using Kolb's learning cycle model to design online resources that enhance in-class interactions. It shares examples of how the authors applied this model at their universities to develop online modules that help optimize face-to-face class time. The goals are to examine Kolb's model for designing learning environments, share examples of applying it to develop flexible online tutorials, and promote discussion of its applicability at other institutions.
The document discusses research on how people learn and effective instructional practices. It emphasizes that instruction is key to improving student outcomes and teachers must have tools and support to continuously improve their practice. Specifically, it recommends using professional learning communities with a common instructional framework or protocol to provide a structure for teachers to collaborate, share knowledge, and focus on improving instructional practice. When implemented well, this approach of collaborative professional development can significantly impact student achievement.
The document discusses vertical collaborative teams in ISD 191. It outlines the objectives of revisiting norms, reviewing the school improvement plan (SIP) and professional development (PD) processes, analyzing student achievement data, and establishing protocols for vertical team sharing. Teams will use constructivist listening, analyze data, develop SIP/PD plans and timelines, differentiate between PD and team meetings, and participate in district PD days focusing on curriculum development.
The document discusses the stages teachers go through when adapting to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in mathematics - denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. It then provides an overview of the CCSS introduction, math practices, and six key shifts in mathematics - focus, coherence, fluency, deep understanding, application, and dual intensity. Teachers are guided to reflect on how these shifts impact their instruction and what students will experience in the classroom.
The “Course Topics” series from Manage Train Learn and Slide Topics is a collection of over 4000 slides that will help you master a wide range of management and personal development skills. The 202 PowerPoints in this series offer you a complete and in-depth study of each topic. This presentation is on "The Facilitator's Toolkit".
This document discusses reflection, peer observation, and the UK Professional Standards Framework (UK PSF) in the context of a teaching development module. It introduces the concepts and importance of reflective practice, peer observation, and the UK PSF for professional development in higher education. It outlines intended learning outcomes related to discussing experiential learning, recognizing the value of peer observation, examining the UK PSF, explaining reflective practice, and developing a strategy to embed reflection. The document provides information on reflection models and cycles, conducting peer observations, and using reflection to enhance teaching practice.
Student perception of collaborative small group projects using synchronous an...David Wicks
This session will report on findings from a three-year study that explored how different communication tools may impact small group collaborative learning projects in an online course. The primary goal of this session is to share successful techniques for organizing and facilitating small group collaborative projects in online and blended courses.
This document outlines a training curriculum that aims to help participants become better trainers. It covers five units: 1) Understanding adult learners, 2) Playing the role of a trainer, 3) Optimizing diversity among trainees, 4) Providing engaging facilitation, and 5) Assessment. The curriculum maps learning outcomes, topics, activities and assessments. It provides examples and tasks for participants to apply principles like catering to different thinking styles and leveraging trainees' experiences. The goal is for participants to learn how to design effective training that considers characteristics of adult learners and diversity.
The document discusses the stages teachers may go through when adapting to the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. It outlines the stages of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. It then provides information on the Common Core math practices, the six shifts in mathematics under Common Core, and focuses on shifts around focus, coherence, and fluency. Key aspects are ensuring depth of understanding, connecting concepts across grades, and developing fluency in core skills.
This document provides guidance for completing assignments for a Western Civilization course. It outlines the steps to understand and break down assignments, including understanding what is being asked, identifying key concepts, and determining how the assignment will be evaluated. It also provides an example assignment, detailing specific requirements for three papers, including formatting guidelines, submission process, feedback options, due dates, and penalties for late submissions.
The document provides presenter notes for leading a workshop on Keeping Learning on Track (KLT) Foundations, outlining the goals of introducing teachers to formative assessment strategies and how their learning will continue through job-embedded professional learning communities. It describes the agenda and activities for the workshop, emphasizing formative assessment techniques to model such as using parking lots for questions, learning targets, and traffic light signals to check understanding. Presenters are guided to facilitate discussions and activities to help teachers understand how to implement formative assessment in their classrooms.
This document outlines the process and stages of teacher inquiry (jugyou kenkyuu) where groups of teachers work together to plan, execute, and evaluate lessons. The stages include:
1. Planning - Teachers define a problem or theme, make a comprehensive lesson plan that incorporates curriculum priorities, and discuss potential issues or changes.
2. Implementation - One teacher implements the experimental lesson while others observe and collect data on different aspects like classroom management, student-teacher interaction, and the overall learning process.
3. Reflection - After the lesson, teachers meet to share observations, reflect on and evaluate the lesson plan and its implementation, examining elements like the theme, materials, instructional methods, and teacher
This document summarizes the process of implementing the Common Core State Standards in a California school district. It discusses establishing what the standards are, why they are needed, and how teachers will meet their demands. Early adopters signed on to pilot the standards and received training. The process involved deconstructing each standard, identifying vocabulary, and creating units, tasks, and rubrics. Challenges included the work required and preparing students, but benefits included increased collaboration and rigor. Ongoing support for teachers was crucial.
Taking differentiation by learning profile to the next levelJeremy
The document discusses differentiating instruction based on student learning profiles. Teachers collect data on student preferences like learning styles and intelligence preferences. When differentiating for learning profile, teachers vary topics, activities, and products. The goal is for students to have choice in how they demonstrate their understanding as long as they meet the learning goals. Teachers should balance opportunities for students to work in preferred and non-preferred ways.
This document discusses reflection and peer observation in teaching. It introduces the UK Professional Standards Framework (UK PSF) and emphasizes the importance of reflective practice and continuing professional development for teachers in higher education. It outlines the goals of discussing experiential learning, recognizing the value of peer observation, examining the UK PSF, explaining the importance of reflection, and developing strategies to embed reflection in teaching practice. The document provides information on conducting peer observations and reflective practice, including Gibbs' reflective cycle model. It emphasizes deepening reflection by linking experiences to theory and exploring options for future action.
Evaluation techniques of teaching: focus groups and Nominal Group TechniqueTünde Varga-Atkins
Slides accompanying a 90-min SEDA workshop on 15th Nov 2012.
Credit to Tunde Varga-Atkins, Jaye McIsaac and Ian Willis, University of Liverpool.
It is the first time we have introduced our new, combined approach for gathering student feedback on teaching. The method can also be used in other contexts such as curriculum review or development.
The Nominal Group Technique is akin to focus groups, but with more structure and an immediate, quantitative output. Our approach has been to combine two stages: stage 1, focus group, followed by stage 2: nominal group. We have found this an effective approach at the University of Liverpool.
The document outlines ways teachers can differentiate instruction for students at different readiness levels, including using varied texts, scaffolding, grouping arrangements, homework options, and assessment. Readiness refers to a student's entry point or current understanding of a topic. Teachers can provide support for students
Write to learn sye workshop january 15 2013Ed Nagelhout
This document discusses using writing effectively in second-year experience courses. It begins by asking why instructors should use student writing and what types of writing assignments they can have students complete. Examples of short writing assignments that can be done in class are provided, such as knowledge probes, minute papers, and concept maps. The document then discusses how to integrate these informal writings and manage the workload for instructors. Suggestions are given for scaffolding assignments, using rubrics, responding to writing in process, and not getting caught up in copyediting. The document concludes by discussing developing formal writing assignments and planning a sequence of activities to meet learning objectives and requirements for pages of writing.
This document provides an introduction to leadership and outlines a 45 minute activity to help participants gain an understanding of the nature of teacher leadership. The activity involves reflections, discussions, and a presentation on developing leadership at different levels including teachers, administrators, higher education, and mathematics and science centers. The goal is to help representatives and leaders in STEM and education better understand leadership development.
The document discusses reflection and peer observation in the context of a professional graduate certificate in academic practice (PGCAP) module. It introduces the UK professional standards framework (PSF) and emphasizes the importance of reflective practice and continuing professional development within higher education. Key points covered include discussing experiential learning and reflection to enhance teaching practice, recognizing the value of peer observation, and examining the UK PSF and its relevance for professional growth. Reflective writing and developing a strategy to embed reflection in one's own teaching are highlighted as important outcomes.
- The document discusses using reflective practice to improve teaching, specifically for information literacy educators.
- It explores key theories on reflection, including reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action. Reflection provides a way to actively think about and improve one's professional development.
- Practical skills and tools for reflective practice are presented, including reflective writing, discussion, and using a pedagogic planner to design inquiry-based learning experiences and identify areas for improvement.
Designing Online Resources to Enhance In-Class InteractionsNITLE
The document discusses using Kolb's learning cycle model to design online resources that enhance in-class interactions. It shares examples of how the authors applied this model at their universities to develop online modules that help optimize face-to-face class time. The goals are to examine Kolb's model for designing learning environments, share examples of applying it to develop flexible online tutorials, and promote discussion of its applicability at other institutions.
The document discusses research on how people learn and effective instructional practices. It emphasizes that instruction is key to improving student outcomes and teachers must have tools and support to continuously improve their practice. Specifically, it recommends using professional learning communities with a common instructional framework or protocol to provide a structure for teachers to collaborate, share knowledge, and focus on improving instructional practice. When implemented well, this approach of collaborative professional development can significantly impact student achievement.
The document discusses vertical collaborative teams in ISD 191. It outlines the objectives of revisiting norms, reviewing the school improvement plan (SIP) and professional development (PD) processes, analyzing student achievement data, and establishing protocols for vertical team sharing. Teams will use constructivist listening, analyze data, develop SIP/PD plans and timelines, differentiate between PD and team meetings, and participate in district PD days focusing on curriculum development.
The document provides an agenda and materials for a district leadership team planning retreat focused on empowering student learning and achievement. The retreat will cover [1] expectations for core instruction and interventions, [2] aligning these expectations to school improvement plans, and [3] developing protocols for monitoring implementation and results.
Classroom response systems allow teachers to collect student feedback anonymously, assess students, and hold them accountable. They increase student participation and engagement by having students respond to questions before hearing peers' answers. This minimizes peer pressure and encourages consideration of all possibilities. Response systems also provide immediate feedback on student learning, enabling teachers to modify lessons in real-time based on students' understanding. When creating clicker questions, teachers should consider the learning goals, what they want to learn about students, and how response distribution may inform changes to engage students with course content.
Vertical Collaborative Teams February 9, 2012ISD191
This document summarizes a meeting about developing core instruction action plans. It includes:
1) An overview of the meeting objectives which were to share plans from different schools, clarify expectations for instruction plans, and develop a checklist outlining the plan expectations.
2) A discussion of the components and implementation of instruction plans, including actions, evidence, impact, resources, responsibilities, and timelines.
3) Instructions for teachers to work in groups to develop a comprehensive checklist communicating the criteria for strong instruction plans using an online template.
This document summarizes the key discussions and activities from a principals' retreat held on August 11, 2011. The retreat focused on strengthening collaboration and commitment to norms, sharing learning about professional learning communities (PLCs), exploring the purpose and structures of the district leadership team (DLT), proposed revisions to the teacher compensation (Q-Comp) program, and connecting expectations to commitments. Participants engaged in reflection activities, discussion of meeting procedures, explored components of the school improvement plan and professional development plan, and committed to focusing their PLC work on collaboration, learning, and results.
The PLC meeting discussed the roles and responsibilities of reading interventionists. Interventionists are responsible for determining student needs, identifying those who require strategic or intensive support, and providing interventions. Group size, schedules, and data review processes are important to determine. Professional development needs for interventionists include training for all levels from introductory to annual, focusing on skills like data analysis and instructional strategies. The PLC will continue to meet monthly to support interventionist work.
The document discusses developing narratives about learning and work at the school and district level. Key points discussed include:
1) Developing protocols for individuals, teams, buildings, and districts to systematically document learning and work to inform continuous improvement.
2) Having individuals, teams, and buildings determine how to monitor progress, draw conclusions, and celebrate accomplishments to shape narratives.
3) The district narrative is based on collective stories from buildings, departments, and programs that are shared at meetings and data fairs.
The document summarizes the agenda and goals for a 4-day curriculum review week at Ridgewood Elementary School. The schedule outlines the daily activities, which include establishing learning targets and criteria for success, examining big ideas and essential questions, and finalizing curriculum guides. Participants will work to create draft curriculum guides that identify what students need to learn, how student learning will be assessed, and how to support students who are struggling or excelling. The desired outcomes are to develop pacing guides to guide instruction and begin the process of continuous teaching and learning improvement.
This document provides guidance on making effective presentations. It discusses four key stages: thinking about the context and content, structuring the presentation, writing a draft, and practicing and reviewing. The context includes the audience, their background and understanding, and the environment. The content focuses on main points to discuss and supporting information. An effective structure builds upon three main points with an introduction and summary. With careful planning and practice, presentations can be successful.
The continuous improvement cycle document outlines a process for ongoing evaluation and improvement of student learning, operations, planning, and stakeholder engagement. Key components include collecting inputs like resources, data, and staff time to inform school processes and drive outcomes in areas such as learning, operations, and satisfaction. It emphasizes using data to monitor variability and make adjustments.
Here are the prompts for today's 60 second lecture:
- Summarize your team's discussion about how to deepen learning through collaborative teams.
- Share one insight or "aha" your team discussed regarding next steps.
You have 60 seconds to stand on one leg and share! Go!
This document provides a checklist for effective collaborative team meetings. It suggests that meetings should [1] keep detailed records and communicate plans to stakeholders, [2] continually share and refine instructional practices based on student data, and [3] regularly reflect on and improve implementation of strategies to meet learning goals. Initial meetings should focus on setting goals and action plans, while continuing meetings assess progress and make adjustments based on evidence. The overall goal is to improve teaching and learning through collaborative data-driven discussion and decision making.
This document provides a checklist for effective collaborative team meetings. It suggests that meetings should [1] keep detailed records and communicate plans to stakeholders, [2] continually share and refine instructional practices based on student data, and [3] regularly reflect on and improve implementation of strategies to meet learning goals. Initial meetings should focus on setting goals and action plans, while continuing meetings assess progress and make adjustments based on evidence. The overall goal is to improve teaching and learning through collaborative data-driven discussion and decision making.
1) Understanding by Design (UbD) is a framework for designing curriculum that focuses on student understanding and backward design.
2) UbD involves identifying desired results, determining acceptable evidence, and planning learning experiences.
3) The goal is for students to develop enduring understandings of key concepts and be able to apply, analyze, and synthesize content.
This document summarizes a meeting of vertical collaborative teams. The objectives of the meeting were to: 1) engage in sharing about school improvement plans, 2) review district curriculum and professional development, 3) clarify expectations for future professional development sessions, 4) process expectations for core instruction action plans, and 5) reflect on learning. Teams from different schools shared about developing, implementing, and monitoring their school improvement plans. An African folktale was discussed in relation to collaborative team expectations. Insights on developing school improvement plans were shared in triads. The next meeting date and sharing site were decided. Aligning district professional development, curriculum development, and school-level action plans was discussed.
District Professional Development October 17ISD191
This document summarizes a district professional development meeting that covered the following key points in 3 sentences:
The meeting reviewed procedures for accessing documents and earning continuing education credits, introduced signals for group interactions, and discussed designing powerful professional development by focusing content on student performance data and teachers' instructional needs. Breakout groups then discussed excerpted readings on collaborative learning and the objectives of district professional development sessions in supporting collaborative teams' work to improve student outcomes.
This district professional development meeting focused on collaborative work to identify essential learning outcomes. Participants learned about documenting their collaborative work, identifying the essential knowledge, skills, and vocabulary needed to achieve learning outcomes, and using standards to guide instructional planning. The key messages were about using limited instructional time strategically and collaboratively determining what students must know and be able to do through their work.
Strategies to Scaffold Rigor and Create Relevance for ELLs-TESOL 2014Laura Lukens
The document summarizes an upcoming workshop on instructional strategies for English language learners. It provides an agenda for the workshop which will introduce new strategy materials aligned to English language proficiency levels, assessments, and research-based principles. The workshop will provide hands-on experience with strategies inventory and glossary to scaffold rigorous instruction for ELLs.
This document discusses horizontal collaborative teams in ISD 191. It provides an agenda for an administrative meeting that focuses on collaborative teams, documenting school improvement plans, distinguishing professional development from collaborative team time, and ensuring consistency in documenting student discipline data. The meeting aims to determine common processes and structures around these topics to promote continuous improvement.
1. A big idea is "information literacy enhances lifelong learning."
2. An essential question is "How can we evaluate information from different sources to expand our understanding?"
3. A concept is "research is a process of gathering, analyzing, and communicating information to answer questions."
This document provides a 10-step planning guide for teachers to follow when developing explicit instruction lessons. The steps include selecting a reading concept to teach, choosing materials, planning an introductory explanation, modeling the strategy, preparing student practice, collecting data on student progress, and reflecting on lessons to improve future instruction.
The document provides an agenda for a problem-based learning activity on cognitive development. Students will be assigned to expert groups to study theories of cognitive development and then to design teams to develop evidence-based projects for early childhood spaces in Brooklyn that are informed by psychological science and cognitive development theories. The design teams will present their project ideas and explain how they integrate relevant cognitive development theories.
Strategies to Scaffold Rigor in Content for Secondary ELLSLaura Lukens
This document discusses strategies for scaffolding rigorous instruction for secondary English language learners. It describes the GO TO Strategies project, which provides teachers with research-based instructional strategies to support ELLs in meeting higher academic standards. The project is informed by CAL's five principles of sheltered instruction. The document explains what the GO TO Strategies are and how they include an introduction, matrix of strategies, inventory of strategies, and glossary. It also discusses language proficiency levels and provides examples of how specific strategies can be used.
6915 week 14 final reflct and prof development SVTaylor123
This document provides the agenda for a seminar and practicum course on literacy professional development. It includes sharing final coaching reflections, discussing professional development models and topics, sharing a selected journal article and how it could be used, and celebrating accomplishments. Participants will partner to exchange and provide feedback on professional journal samples. The document outlines discussions on planning multidimensional professional development based on a chapter reading, including needs assessments, goals, and workshop structure. Participants will collaborate on preliminary plans for professional discussions using selected journal articles.
This document discusses assessment and moderation practices across the Liberton and Gracemount Clusters. It outlines the cluster and school assessment coordinators and describes how they have worked to create exemplars and participate in moderation. The aims are to develop a better understanding of what achieving a level looks like and to become more familiar with significant aspects, particularly in reading and listening. The plan involves CAT sessions to reflect on evidence gathered related to significant aspects and to further develop practices in own schools.
The document summarizes key points from a district leadership retreat. It includes discussions around improving student learning through professional learning communities and organizational learning. Leaders were asked to reflect on how they spend their time and recognize drifting behaviors. Breakout groups discussed school improvement plans and assessments in relation to the district's strategic roadmap. The document concludes with reflections on merging personal visions into a clear district message and overcoming challenges through collaboration.
The document summarizes the district's work over the past year to improve teaching, learning, and student achievement. Key points include developing curriculum and intervention systems, implementing new programs like ADSIS, analyzing assessment data showing progress in reading and math, and recommending the board approve the annual report.
The document is a summary of an admin retreat held in August 2012. It provides details on poster paper pics that were taken on Wednesday, August 8th during the retreat. In 3 sentences or less, the document summarizes photos taken of poster papers during an administrator retreat in August 2012.
The document provides details of an administrative retreat for school district administrators held from August 8-10, 2012. It includes an overview of the 3-day agenda with topics to be covered each morning and afternoon. It also lists the members of 6 mixed mini-teams that will participate in activities during the retreat. The retreat focuses on developing plans and strategies for continuous improvement, data analysis, professional development, and preparing for board work sessions. Quotes and information shared focus on the challenges of creating professional learning communities and developing a consistent method for assessing performance and progress toward goals.
The document outlines Burnsville-Eagan-Savage Public Schools' proposed Professional Pay (Pro-Pay) plan for 2012-2013. Pro-Pay aims to provide opportunities for teachers to grow professionally and receive compensation through building goals, collaborative team goals, personalized professional development plans, and observations/coaching. It explains the components and expectations of Pro-Pay and how it aligns with district and school improvement efforts. Important dates are listed for informational meetings and potential votes on approving Pro-Pay.
This document outlines the agenda and discussion topics for a vertical collaborative teams meeting. Key points included celebrating leadership successes, reviewing expectations for school improvement plans and instructional plans, providing updates on professional development opportunities, and clarifying district, principal, and teacher responsibilities to support core instruction and intervention systems. Time was spent discussing how to refine these areas and identifying relevant professional learning. The goal was to align efforts across the district to focus on research-based practices around curriculum, instruction, and student support.
The document summarizes Burnsville-Eagan-Savage Public Schools' proposed Professional Pay (Pro-Pay) system for the 2012-2013 school year. Pro-Pay would compensate teachers for meeting expectations in four areas: a building goal, a collaborative team goal, a personalized professional learning plan, and observations and instructional coaching. It provides timelines and processes for developing goals and participating in professional development, observations, and coaching aligned with school and teacher needs. Meetings are scheduled in April and May for staff to learn more about Pro-Pay and provide input before the system is voted on and approved.
The document outlines an agenda for a Q-Comp planning session with the following key points:
1. The session will involve backward planning, dividing into groups to review goals, and having each group analyze and provide clarity on components of the plan.
2. The groups will review building goals, collaborative team goals, observations, and professional learning plans.
3. Implementation of the plan requires approval from the school board and a staff vote by certain deadlines.
The document provides information about an upcoming professional development meeting, including signals to transition discussions, how meeting documents will be distributed, and how to sign in to earn continuing education credits. Teachers are asked to collaboratively discuss and record their analysis of essential learning outcomes from a previous meeting using the provided template.
The document summarizes a professional learning community (PLC) meeting for reading interventionists. The objectives of the meeting were to standardize processes for identifying students needing interventions, identify consistent data sources to guide support, learn how to use an assessment tool called iCue, and discuss expectations for upcoming professional development on Pyramid Response to Intervention (PRTI). Participants scheduled appointments, read poems, learned how to access iCue from the director of assessment, updated process flowcharts, and discussed learning expectations for the upcoming PRTI training.
Here are the key messages I captured from our meeting:
- Core instruction involves identifying essential learning outcomes, units of instruction, aligned assessments, research-based strategies, and interventions/enrichments.
- District will provide curriculum development and PD on essential learning outcomes but sites need strategies for collaborative team meetings focused on PLC questions.
- New MCA III test will be online, allow for growth model with up to 3 administrations, and provide immediate scores to inform instruction.
- Focus on research-based strategies and PL for improving reading and math achievement of identified student groups.
- Continue implementing district initiatives like PBIS, Responsive Classroom, AVID, equity audits while also focusing PLCs on
The document summarizes the agenda and objectives for a two-day principals' retreat focused on school culture and collaboration. The retreat aims to develop collaborative culture among principals, revisit norms of collaboration, deepen understanding of focus questions and school improvement plans, and link collaboration to professional development plans. Time is allocated for curriculum, assessment, and instruction discussions in vertical and horizontal teams. Quotes on collaboration are shared to spark reflection, and norms of collaboration are assessed and redefined to guide the principals' work.
The document discusses focus questions for collaborative teams and procedures for district leadership team meetings. It includes sections on reviewing the purpose and functions of the district leadership team, clarifying expectations for collaborative team time versus professional learning time, and celebrating progress. Key points include having collaborative teams focus on what students should know and be able to do, how teams will know if students are learning, and how teams will respond when students don't learn or do learn. The document provides guidance for district leadership team meetings, including protocols for sharing progress and learning from each other.
The document outlines the agenda and objectives for a district leadership team meeting taking place on August 17-18, 2011. The meeting will focus on developing a collaborative culture, deepening understanding of continuous improvement processes, drafting SMART goals, and engaging in shared learning. Key objectives include reviewing the purposes and functions of the district and building leadership teams, extending work on the school improvement plan and professional development plans, and discussing revisions to the teacher compensation system. Meeting logistics and protocols are also provided.
The Teaching and Learning Team reported to the School Board on guiding questions around student learning outcomes, assessment, and response to learning. They provided perspectives on developing rigorous curriculum, supporting job-embedded professional development, and using balanced assessments to improve instruction. The report outlined facilitating curriculum development, managing curricula, evaluating programs, developing intervention systems, and using data to drive instruction. It also discussed the role of technology in achieving educational goals and establishing a professional learning community focused on student results.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
2. Key Learning Objectives
Determine Continue Review
Participate in
“non- development expectations
collaborative
negotiables” of core and provide
sharing with
for how instruction feedback for
vertical
collaborative action plan January 23
collaborative
teams use using learning and February
teams
their time from DLT 20 district PD
“The most significant tight policies should be
the ones most directly associated with the
learning mission.”
-Eaker and Keating
3. Virtual Parking Lot: TodaysMeet
• Use the following link on TodaysMeet to share any questions
and/or comments about the concepts that frame our agenda
as part of a backchannel and/or formative assessment.
• http://todaysmeet.com/ISD191VerticalTeams
1. Go to todaysmeet.com
2. Name your room (i.e.,
ISD191VerticalTeams)
3. Determine when room
will be deleted
4. Select create room
5. Select “transcript” to
capture questions and
comments
4.
5. Grounding: Celebration of Staff
How are you planning
to celebrate the
work of your staff
before the holiday
break?
7. Feedback During Sharing
• Use the TodaysMeet link set up for your
vertical team to provide feedback to the
teams from BAHS, Eagle Ridge, or Nicollet
Site URL
BAHS http://todaysmeet.com/BAHSFeedback
ERJ http://todaysmeet.com/ERJFeedback
NJH http://todaysmeet.com/NJHFeedback
8. Feedback: What Did You Hear…?
• …that speaks to the
good work that the
team/building is
doing?
• …that you want to
learn more about from
the site?
• …that may guide your
work (learning at your
building)?
9. Break: Think Lunch
As we transition
to the rest of our
meeting, enjoy a
10 minute break.
10. Collaborative Team Work & Time
As you review the processing about the leading and doing of collaborative teams
that we discussed last Wednesday and other resources, identify the “non-
negotiables” for how our collaborative teams need to function?
List Share
• Individually review • Create a list of
the excerpts on the non-negotiables to
handout and • Create a list what guide collaborative • Be prepared to
identify non- needs/has to be teams with your share your list with
negotiables for CTs part of how vertical team the other cohorts
collaborative
teams work
Review Collaborate
Think Descriptive Checklist!
11. Trio Talk
• During your lunch, discuss
the following questions: Trios
• What did you learn
about how collaborative BAHS, EN, WB
teams need to use their
time?
• How does that
BHS, RN, ST
understanding inform
how collaborative team ERJH, GP, MWS
time is structured and/or
needs to be monitored? HB, NJHS, SO
• Be prepared to share with
the other trios. HV, MJHS, VV
12. By the End of the Year…
For those writing curriculum For those engaged in district PD
• Develop units of instruction • Document essential learning
for their grade level based outcomes, essential
on standards and guided by knowledge, essential skills,
essential learning outcomes and key vocabulary for
(ELOs) course(s) taught—aligned with
standards
• Begin developing formative • Begin developing formative
assessments aligned with assessments aligned with
ELOs, essential knowledge, ELOs, essential knowledge,
skills, and key vocabulary skills, and key vocabulary
• Share units of instruction • Share work across content
across grade level area
13. Developing Formative Assessments
Essential Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment
Outcome Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
Create, document a variety of
Document essential assessment options to check for and
learning outcomes, demonstrate student understanding
essential knowledge,
essential skills that students
need to learn
14. Developing Formative Assessments
Essential Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment
Outcome Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
Communicate Record what In small groups, Talk with Write a
understanding you learned discuss the another class paragraph
of character about each of character traits member about about the most
development the main that are the what you think essential
characters most important the character character traits
using a for helping us will do— that have been
fishbone understand the predict his demonstrated
diagram. story; create a actions, and and what they
list to share then briefly reveal about
with the rest of write why you the meaning of
the class. made the the story.
predictions you
did.
15. Focus of District PD—January 23
8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
K-6—Math K-12 Specialists
• Continue to develop units of • Continue to review standards
instruction (that are based on and benchmarks for the
standards and benchmarks course(s) or grade level taught
and that are guided by
essential learning outcomes) • Identify the essential learning
• Deepen understanding of outcomes by unpacking the
assessment literacy standards (get at the what—
• Develop formative knowledge and how—skills)
assessments aligned with • Document the essential
essential learning outcomes, learning outcomes,
knowledge, skills, and key knowledge, skills, and key
vocabulary vocabulary
16. Focus of District PD—February 20
8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
K-6—Math K-12 Specialists
• Continue to develop units of • Share essential learning
instruction (that are based on outcomes to identify when,
standards and benchmarks where, and to what extent the
and that are guided by essential learning outcome is
essential learning outcomes) being addressed
• Deepen understanding of • Deepen understanding of
assessment literacy assessment literacy
• Develop formative • Develop formative
assessments aligned with assessments aligned with
essential learning outcomes, essential learning outcomes,
knowledge, skills, and key knowledge, skills, and key
vocabulary vocabulary
17. Focus of District PD—February 20
8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. for Secondary
7-12 (not ELA, Science, and Math)
7-12 ELA, Science, and Math
• Continue to review standards and
• Share essential learning benchmarks for the course(s) taught
outcomes to identify when, • Identify the essential learning outcomes by
where, and to what extent the unpacking the standards (get at the what—
essential learning outcome is knowledge and how—skills)
being addressed • Document the essential learning outcomes,
knowledge, skills, and key vocabulary
• Deepen understanding of
• Vertically share essential learning outcomes
assessment literacy to identify when, where, and to what extent
• Develop formative the essential learning outcome is being
assessments aligned with addressed
essential learning outcomes, • Deepen understanding of assessment literacy
knowledge, skills, and key • Develop formative assessments aligned with
essential learning outcomes, knowledge,
vocabulary skills, and key vocabulary
18. Prepping for January 23, February 20
• January 5 training and • February 2 training and
planning session for planning session for
elementary principals elementary and
• January 12 and 19 secondary principals
(additional time added (separate sessions)
to principals’ meetings • February 9 and 16
to review processes and (additional time added
expectations) to principals’ meetings
to review processes and
expectations)
19. Curriculum Writing Prior to January 23
Grade Meeting FYI…
Level Date • You are more than welcome to
attend any of the curriculum
K January 19 writing sessions so that you
develop a better
1st January 18 understanding of the work in
which your teachers are and
will continue to be engaged
2nd January 12 • You can also access PPTs and
meeting notes from all
3rd January 11 curriculum meetings on the
TLT dashboard and access
4th January 10 emerging units of instruction
on the curriculum library
(Drupal Gardens)
20. District PD: Interventions
When? For Whom? Who Should Attend?
February 3 and 10 District All district interventionists
Interventionists
February 13-14 Elementary Teachers Up to 7 teachers from each
elementary building—
ideally one from each
grade level
February 27-28 Secondary Teachers Up to 15 teachers from
each secondary site.
Up to 5 from BAHS
Note: Confirm participants no later than January 3. Staff from other
districts will be invited to attend, so a confirmation would be most
appreciated. Budget codes will be sent following our meeting. Information
regarding summer resource development will be sent following the start of
the new year.
21. April dates are
being rescheduled!
District PD: Assessment
When? For Whom? Who Should Attend?
April 16-17 Secondary Teachers Up to 12 teachers from each
May 24-25 secondary site and 4 from BAHS
can attend each session for a total
of 24 teachers per secondary site
and 8 from BAHS
May 1-2 Elementary Teachers Up to 10 teachers from each
May 21-22 elementary can attend; five sites
can attend May 1-2, and the other
sites can attend May 21-22
Note: Confirm participants no later than February 1. Staff from other
districts will be invited to attend, so a confirmation would be most
appreciated. Budget codes will be sent following our meeting. Summer
assessment writing information will be confirmed after the start of the new
year.
22. District Curriculum, PD & Other Dates
• Look for a draft calendar
for meeting dates for the
following:
– District Curriculum Writing
– District PD
• Intervention Cohorts
• Assessment Cohorts
• Elementary Reading
Interventionists
• Elementary Math
Interventionists
• Secondary Interventionists
– District PBIS Planning Team
– District Equity Planning Team
23. Starting January…
• Vertical collaborative team meetings will focus more on
sharing results
– Expect to bring evidence of your work related to core
instruction and 3 big ideas
– Look for specifics—in advance of the meetings—about the
focus of our sharing (i.e., January—core instruction)
• Horizontal collaborative team meetings
– Elementary and secondary will now meet from 9:30-12:30
– Meeting locations will be confirmed soon
– Similar, yet more flexible groupings
• APs should attend collaborative team meetings
24. Core Instruction:
What’s Happened or Happening?
(Initially Shared: 11/13/2011)
• The units of instruction (based on standards and essential
learning outcomes) through our district curriculum meetings
• The essential learning outcomes (and essential knowledge, skills,
and vocabulary) being articulated through our district PD days
(including Jan. 23 & Feb. 20)
• The work of your collaborative teams dedicated to the 4 PLC
questions, not building PD topics
• The PD being led in your building to support teachers'
understanding of question 1
• The meetings related to reading, math, team or department
meetings that support the focus of question 1
25. Core Instruction: Defined
(Initially Shared with Principals: 11/13/2011)
• Core instruction involves
– The identification of essential learning outcomes for the grade
level and/or course(s) taught
– The development of units of instruction, guided by essential
learning outcomes and standards and benchmarks
– The development of a continuum of assessments aligned with
the essential learning outcomes, skills, knowledge, and key
academic vocabulary
– The identification of research-based instructional strategies to
deliver instruction
– The identification and/or development of classroom-based
interventions and enrichments
26. Core Instruction Action Plan
• As we deepen our understanding • Individually reflect on the
of core instruction, review the questions to the left.
descriptors for how we plan to • Review the notes from last
operationalize the definition of Wednesday.
core instruction and the first 3 • Review the work that has
components of our definition. occurred through our district’s
• Respond to the questions that curriculum development and our
follow regarding the core district’s PD plan.
instruction action plan: • When prompted, join your
– What needs to be part of your collaborative team members and
core instruction action plan? generate a list of the “expected
– In what ways do the non- work” at sites and across the
negotiables for collaborative district on core instruction.
team guide inform your core
instruction action plan? • Be prepared to share when
– Where do you want your staff prompted.
members to be by the end of the
year?
27. Action Plan: Essential Questions
(Initially Shared: 8/18/2011)
• What actions or strategies
are needed? Current Reality
• What will you document as (Needs Assessment)
evidence of impact? Of
implementation?
• What resources will you Student
use? Achievement Goals
• Who will be responsible?
• What are your timelines Core
and processes for Instruction System of
Interventions
Culture and
Climate
Community
Engagement
Action
monitoring? Plan
Action Plan Action Plan Action Plan
28. PD Action Plans
(Initially Shared: 8/18/2011)
• Create an action plan that details how the learning
for adults will be implemented and monitored.
– The specific learning that your site will engage in (think
KUDOs—what teachers will “know, understand, and do”)
– The timeline for when the learning will occur
– The timeline for monitoring the learning (getting at impact
and results)
– The processes you will use for monitoring learning (i.e.,
reflections on learning, reflections for action, student
learning, etc.)
– The resources required to support your PD
– The person(s) responsible
29. The Way to a Happy School
Year
To leave the old with a burst of song;
To recall the right and forgive the wrong;
To forget the things that bind you fast
To the vain regrets of the year that’s past;
To have the strength to let go your hold
Of the not worthwhile of the days grown old;
To dare go forth with a purpose true,
To the unknown task of the year that’s new;
To help your brother along the road,
To do his work and lift his load;
To add your gift to the world’s good cheer,
Is to have and to give a Happy School Year.
~ Author Unknown
Editor's Notes
Press F5 or enter presentation mode to view the poll\r\nIn an emergency during your presentation, if the poll isn't showing, navigate to this link in your web browser:\r\nhttp://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/OTg4NTEwOTIIf you like, you can use this slide as a template for your own voting slides. You might use a slide like this if you feel your audience would benefit from the picture showing a text message on a phone.
The bold, italicized serve as the focus for your core instruction action plan this year.