This presentation will explore how the places of learning might look in next generation learning spaces where learners traverse physical and virtual spaces using personalised learning strategies. It will examine how learning spaces may represent ubiquitous spaces in which the learner undertakes some form of study or learning.
The blurring of face-to-face learning and teaching and online learning is a significant shift for both learners and staff of universities. This disintegration of the distinction and the growing acceptance that learning occurs in different ‘places’ presents both exciting and challenging opportunities for higher education. In this presentation I will deconstruct the concept of blended learning in the higher education setting and seek to focus on the opportunities it provides to learners, teachers and institutions.
Blended learning involves the integration of both on-campus face-to-face learning and teaching and off-campus virtual learning environments utilising the ‘affordances’ of each environment to enhance the student experience. Blended learning and teaching can occur at four levels of granularity. These include: activity-level blending, subject/course-level blending, program/degree-level blending and institutional-level blending (Graham, 2006). A blended learning design may also be enabling, enhancing or transformative. A combination of physical/virtual, formal/informal would be considered in these spaces to optimise the student experience.
Teachers need to adopt a design perspective in the blended learning and teaching environment. Design thinking by its nature is strategic and future focussed. It is a thoughtful and considered pedagogical approach to ensure relevance for both learners and teachers. This presentation will discuss authentic learning experiences and pedagogical principles including: interactive learning (learner-to-content), networked learning (learner-to-learner, learner-to-teacher), learner-generated content (learners-as-designers), connected learner approaches (knowledge-is-in-the-network) and assessment-as-learning.
Moodleposium: Roadmap for Personalised LearningMike KEPPELL
Personalised Lifelong Learning in a Digital Age
In this presentation I will examine key concepts for lifelong learning in a digital age. I will focus on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of learners who need to navigate the ‘chaos’ of an ambiguous learning landscape. I define personalised learning as the knowledge, skills and attitudes that enable learning and act as a catalyst to empower the learner to continue to learn. Personalised learning is no longer about what the learner knows now, but concerns how the learner can learn more. Resilient personalised learners will need to adapt and seek solutions for problems, issues, and challenges on a daily basis. Learners will need to adopt a ‘growth mindset’ as opposed to a ‘fixed mindset’ (Dweck, 2006). When a learner adopts a growth mindset, they openly seek challenge and thrive on challenge. However ‘growth mindset learners’ also need a toolkit to tackle the complexities of the learning landscape that is becoming increasingly digital, connected, and ambiguous. This toolkit encompasses digital literacies, seamless learning, self-regulated learning, learning-oriented assessment, lifelong/life-wide learning, and flexible learning pathways.
Engage 2015: Emerging Technology and Online Learning TrendsMike KEPPELL
What is the context?
Learning transformations
Deconstructing blended learning
Places and spaces of blended learning
Design opportunities
Distributive leadership
Changing mindsets
Coordinated by the OER Foundation, OERu is an independent, not-for-profit organization with 35 participating Higher Education institutions worldwide, making higher education accessible to everyone by offering free online courses and “affordable ways for learners to gain academic credit towards qualifications from recognised institutions” (McGreal, Rory, et al. 2014). The 2015 OERu evaluation follows the CIPP (context, input, process, and product) evaluation framework (Stufflebeam 2003) and focuses on “input analysis” at this stage. The evaluation aims to assess different design options and identify major challenges in online curriculum developments, nominating open courses by participating institutions, open business models, open governance, and other aspects. Issues raised in the evaluation process are not unique for OERu and will have relevance to other practitioners designing open education.
The blurring of face-to-face learning and teaching and online learning is a significant shift for both learners and staff of universities. This disintegration of the distinction and the growing acceptance that learning occurs in different ‘places’ presents both exciting and challenging opportunities for higher education. In this presentation I will deconstruct the concept of blended learning in the higher education setting and seek to focus on the opportunities it provides to learners, teachers and institutions.
Blended learning involves the integration of both on-campus face-to-face learning and teaching and off-campus virtual learning environments utilising the ‘affordances’ of each environment to enhance the student experience. Blended learning and teaching can occur at four levels of granularity. These include: activity-level blending, subject/course-level blending, program/degree-level blending and institutional-level blending (Graham, 2006). A blended learning design may also be enabling, enhancing or transformative. A combination of physical/virtual, formal/informal would be considered in these spaces to optimise the student experience.
Teachers need to adopt a design perspective in the blended learning and teaching environment. Design thinking by its nature is strategic and future focussed. It is a thoughtful and considered pedagogical approach to ensure relevance for both learners and teachers. This presentation will discuss authentic learning experiences and pedagogical principles including: interactive learning (learner-to-content), networked learning (learner-to-learner, learner-to-teacher), learner-generated content (learners-as-designers), connected learner approaches (knowledge-is-in-the-network) and assessment-as-learning.
Moodleposium: Roadmap for Personalised LearningMike KEPPELL
Personalised Lifelong Learning in a Digital Age
In this presentation I will examine key concepts for lifelong learning in a digital age. I will focus on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of learners who need to navigate the ‘chaos’ of an ambiguous learning landscape. I define personalised learning as the knowledge, skills and attitudes that enable learning and act as a catalyst to empower the learner to continue to learn. Personalised learning is no longer about what the learner knows now, but concerns how the learner can learn more. Resilient personalised learners will need to adapt and seek solutions for problems, issues, and challenges on a daily basis. Learners will need to adopt a ‘growth mindset’ as opposed to a ‘fixed mindset’ (Dweck, 2006). When a learner adopts a growth mindset, they openly seek challenge and thrive on challenge. However ‘growth mindset learners’ also need a toolkit to tackle the complexities of the learning landscape that is becoming increasingly digital, connected, and ambiguous. This toolkit encompasses digital literacies, seamless learning, self-regulated learning, learning-oriented assessment, lifelong/life-wide learning, and flexible learning pathways.
Engage 2015: Emerging Technology and Online Learning TrendsMike KEPPELL
What is the context?
Learning transformations
Deconstructing blended learning
Places and spaces of blended learning
Design opportunities
Distributive leadership
Changing mindsets
Coordinated by the OER Foundation, OERu is an independent, not-for-profit organization with 35 participating Higher Education institutions worldwide, making higher education accessible to everyone by offering free online courses and “affordable ways for learners to gain academic credit towards qualifications from recognised institutions” (McGreal, Rory, et al. 2014). The 2015 OERu evaluation follows the CIPP (context, input, process, and product) evaluation framework (Stufflebeam 2003) and focuses on “input analysis” at this stage. The evaluation aims to assess different design options and identify major challenges in online curriculum developments, nominating open courses by participating institutions, open business models, open governance, and other aspects. Issues raised in the evaluation process are not unique for OERu and will have relevance to other practitioners designing open education.
Mapping the road to personalised learningGeorge Drivas
Mass Customisation transformed the world as firms engaged in the innovation needed to meet the needs and aspirations of individual clients. Can education benefit from the same principle?
Ossiannilsson oeb18 how to create innovative learning spacesEbba Ossiannilsson
My workshop at #OEB18 on Innovative Learning Spaces. some 40 delegates from all over the world participated in a very active and interactive workshop for 4 hrs. It was just so much energy and great conversations. Just loved it <3
Mapping the road to personalised learningGeorge Drivas
Mass Customisation transformed the world as firms engaged in the innovation needed to meet the needs and aspirations of individual clients. Can education benefit from the same principle?
Ossiannilsson oeb18 how to create innovative learning spacesEbba Ossiannilsson
My workshop at #OEB18 on Innovative Learning Spaces. some 40 delegates from all over the world participated in a very active and interactive workshop for 4 hrs. It was just so much energy and great conversations. Just loved it <3
Personalised Learners: Mobile, Connected and Ready?Mike KEPPELL
Drivers and barriers in implementing mobile learning in higher education
Current usage and trends among higher education students
Strategies and guidelines for sustainable mobile learning.
D4DL Workshop presentation at Bristol: 9th October 2013Kevin Burden
Dr. Kevin Burden presents findings from research projects across the UK showing how teachers are using iPods, iPads and other mobile devices. He argues that understanding what works well on mobile devices is not sufficient and that researchers need to work alongside teachers to construct meaningful mobile learning scenarios.
Examining the Psychometric Features of the Persian Computer-Assisted Language...Parisa Mehran
This study set out to investigate the psychometric quality of the Persian CALL instrument (P-CALLI). We used principal components analysis and rating scale model (RSM) to validate the instrument. A two-component solution was found to be the best model where cognitive and affective items clustered as one component and items regarding the use of CALL in learning English skills loaded on the second component. This finding is in line with the previous studies which showed that cognitive and affective dimensions are not empirically separable. To establish the validity of CALL attitude and attitude theories, it is important to use rigorous psychometrical methods which can examine the presence of construct-irrelevant factors. This requirement has not been fulfilled in a large number of previous studies which have relied heavily on the internal consistency of the instruments.
Innovating Pedagogy 2019.
This series of reports explores new forms of teaching, learning and assessment for an interactive world, to guide teachers and policy makers in productive innovation.
Similar to Personalised Learning Strategies for Higher education (20)
Empowering active learning of higher education students through space, pedago...Mike KEPPELL
Learning spaces need to encompass formal teaching spaces, informal learning spaces and virtual learning and teaching spaces. The combination of space, pedagogy and technology needs to be seamlessly integrated to support 21st Century learning. Learning spaces must utilise new technology and flexibility to enable active learning and meet student expectations and accommodate different teaching approaches. In this session, Professor Mike Keppell will reflect on different institutional approaches in addressing student learning by choreographing space, technology and pedagogy to achieve Institutional goals. Professor Keppell is an internationally respected academic and has held leadership roles across six universities. In this session he will to discuss his experience in transformational teaching and learning spaces that require the blend of technological tools and pedagogical practices to meet teacher and learner expectations. Case studies from different universities will be presented in the points below:
" Pedagogy, space and technology: What's new? How have the three elements evolved? How do they all relate
" Swinburne University of Technology Learning Space Case Study
" European Learning space Case study
" Malaysian University Case Study
Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching: Priorities for Institutions,...Mike KEPPELL
Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching: Priorities for Institutions, Teachers and Learners in a Connected World
This presentation will focus on learning and teaching in a connected world within the Higher Education context. Knowledge is now co-created, disseminated via networks, and personalised. It has moved from being described as “explaining some part of the world” and “used in some type of action” to involving ecologies and networks (Siemens, 2006, p. vi). The presentation will focus on:
• How learning and teaching has changed in a connected world
o Active learning
o Learning spaces
o Central role of technology
• Innovative teaching in a connected world
o Blended learning
o Authentic assessment
o Professional development
• The knowledge, skills and attitudes teachers need to thrive in a connected world
o Digital fluency
o Seamless teaching
o Assuring best practice in technology-enhanced environments
o Technology affordances
o Scholarship
o Learning analytics
• The knowledge, skills and attitudes learners need to thrive in a connected world
o Learners will need a toolkit encompassing digital literacies, seamless learning, self-regulated learning, learning-oriented assessment, lifelong learning, and flexible learning pathways. This toolkit will enable the learner to tackle the complexities of the learning landscape that is becoming increasingly digital, connected, and ambiguous.
Keynote Bogata, Colombia: Innovative Pedagogies in a Connected world: Strateg...Mike KEPPELL
Innovative Pedagogies in a Connected world: Strategies for Teaching in a Digital Age
This presentation will focus on learning and teaching in a connected world within the Higher Education context. Knowledge is now co-created, disseminated via networks, and personalised. It has moved from being described as “explaining some part of the world” and “used in some type of action” to involving ecologies and networks (Siemens, 2006, p. vi). The presentation will focus on:
• How learning and teaching has changed in a connected world
o Diversity of students
o Wide range of learning spaces
o Greater need to connect with students
o Technology moving to a central role
• Innovative teaching in a connected world
o Blended learning
o Authentic assessment
o Personalised learning
o Open education
• The knowledge, skills and attitudes teachers need to thrive in a connected world
o Digital fluency
o Technology affordances
o Seamless teaching
o Scholarship
o Learning analytics
o Feedback as feed-forward
• The knowledge, skills and attitudes learners need to thrive in a connected world
o Learners will need a toolkit encompassing digital literacies, seamless learning, self-regulated learning, learning-oriented assessment, lifelong learning, and flexible learning pathways. This toolkit will enable the learner to tackle the complexities of the learning landscape that is becoming increasingly digital, connected, and ambiguous.
References:
1. Bates, A.W. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
2. Keppell, M.J. (2015). The learning future: Personalised learning in an open world. In Curtis J. Bonk, Mimi Miyoung Lee, Thomas C. Reeves, and Thomas H. Reynolds. MOOCs and Open Education around the World. Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
3. Keppell, M., Suddaby, G. & Hard, N. (2015). Assuring best practice in technology-enhanced learning environments. Research in Learning Technology. 2015, 23: 25728 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.25728
Keppell, M., Au, E., Ma, A. & Chan, C. (2006). Peer learning and learning-oriented assessment in technology-enhanced environments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 453-464.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
3. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 3
Defining Learning Spaces
Physical, blended or virtual
learning environments that
enhance learning
Physical, blended or virtual
‘areas’ that motivate a
learner to learn
4. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 4
Defining Learning Spaces
Spaces where both
teachers and learners
optimise the perceived
and actual affordances
of the space; and
Spaces that promote
authentic learning
interactions (Keppell
& Riddle, 2012, 2013).
5. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 5
Personalised Learning
I define personalised
learning as the knowledge,
skills and attitudes that
enable learning and act as
a catalyst to empower the
learner to continue to learn
(Keppell, 2015)
6. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 6
Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes
Knowledge is now co-
created
Skills form a basis for
learning
Attitudes influence beliefs
and behaviours
Growth mindset (Dweck,
2006)
Openly seek challenge
7. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 7
Personalised Learning Toolkit
Digital literacies
Seamless learning
Self-regulated learning
Learning-oriented
assessment
Lifelong and life-wide
learning
Flexible learning pathways
8. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 8
Levels of Digital Literacies
Digital Competency
knowing how to use
digital tools
Digital Fluency
applying digital
knowledge and skills
Digital Design
user-generated content
‘learner-as-designer’
9. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 9
Wheeler Digital Literacies
Social networking skills
Transliteracy skills
Maintaining Privacy
Managing Identity
Creating content
Organising and sharing
content
Reusing/repurposing content
Filtering and selecting content
Self broadcasting
http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/what-digital-literacies.html
13. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 13
Seamless Learning
Continuity of learning
across a combination of
locations, times,
technologies or social
settings
(Sharples, et al, 2012,
2013).
14. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 14
Levels of Seamless Learning
On-campus
comfortable with formal
and informal spaces
Virtual campus
comfortable with blended,
online, social media
Anywhere
trains, cafes, teleworking
15. Physical Virtual
Formal Informal InformalFormal
Blended
Mobile Personal
Outdoor
Professional
Practice
Distributed Learning
Spaces
Academic
15
17. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 17
Levels of Self-Regulated Learning
Scaffolded learners
teachers scaffold learning
Strategic learners
learners begin to manage
their own learning
Autonomous learners
learners become
strategic learners
18. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 18
Levels of Learning-oriented Assessment
Authentic assessment
learners participate in
authentic assessment
Negotiated assessment
learners negotiate
assessment with teachers
Self-assessment
learners act on ‘feedback
as feed-forward’
19. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 19
Learning-oriented Assessment
Assessment tasks
as learning tasks
Student
involvement in
assessment
processes
Forward-looking
feedback
20. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 20
Assessment Tasks as Learning Tasks
Assessment tasks
determine student effort
Tasks should require
distribution of student time
and effort (Gibbs &
Simpson, 2004)
21. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 21
Student Involvement in Assessment
Students begin to learn
about assessment
Students begin to
determine the quality of
their own work
22. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 22
Feedback as Feedforward
Feedback should be timely
and with a potential to be
acted upon (Gibbs &
Simpson, 2004)
23.
24.
25.
26.
27. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 27
Lifelong & Life-wide Learning
Encompasses both formal
and informal learning, self-
motivated learning..(Watson,
2003).
Life-wide learning “contains
many parallel and
interconnected journeys
and experiences...”
(Jackson, 2010, p. 492).
28. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 28
Levels of Lifelong Learning
Short-term
learners are focussed on
current courses
Future-focussed
relates courses to future job
Being a learner
learning becomes a
customary practice
29. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 29
Digital Portfolios
Populated by the learner
Able to present multiple
stories of learning
30. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 30
The future will require learners
to be lifelong learners whose
ability to learn will be an
essential survival skill set to
thrive in this changing world
(Keppell, 2015).
32. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 32
Levels of Learning Pathways
Prescribed
fixed learning pathway
Flexible
learner has some
choice through
electives
Open education
learner constructs
learning pathway to
meet their needs
33. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 33
Learning Space Literacies
Learning space literacies
are the knowledge, skills
and attitudes that are
required to recognise,
utilise and adapt
distributed learning
spaces so that they allow
the personalised learner to
engage with their learning
(Keppell, 2014).
34. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 34
References
Carless, D. (2014). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: How you can fulfil your potential. Constable and Robinson, Ltd. London.
Jackson, N. J. (2010). From a curriculum that integrates work to a curriculum that integrates life:
Changing a university’s conceptions of curriculum. Higher Education Research &Development,
29(5), 491-505. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.502218
Keppell, M., & Riddle, M. (2013). Principles for design and evaluation of learning spaces. In R.
Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of
design in educational technology (pp. 20-32). New York, NY: Routledge
Keppell, M., Au, E., Ma, A. & Chan, C. (2006). Peer learning and learning-oriented
assessment in technology-enhanced environments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher
Education, 31(4), 453-464.
Keppell, M. & Carless, D. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment: A technology-based case
study. Assessment in Education, 13(2), 153-165.
Keppell, M., Souter, K. & Riddle, M. (Eds.). (2012). Physical and virtual learning spaces in
higher education: Concepts for the modern learning environment. IGI Global, Hershey: New
York. ISBN13: 9781609601140.
Keppell, M. & Riddle, M. (2012). Distributed learning places: Physical, blended and virtual
learning spaces in higher education. (pp. 1-20). In Mike Keppell, Kay Souter & Matthew
Riddle (Eds.). (2011). Physical and virtual learning spaces in higher education: Concepts for
the modern learning environment. Information Science Publishing, Hershey.
35. Swinburne
SCIENCE | TECHNOLOGY | INNOVATION | BUSINESS | DESIGN 35
References
Keppell, M.J. (2014). Personalised learning strategies for higher education. In Kym Fraser
(Ed.) The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces.
International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, Volume 12, 3-21. Copyright 2014
by Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Keppell, M.J. (2015). The learning future: Personalised learning in an open world. In Curtis J. Bonk, Mimi
Miyoung Lee, Thomas C. Reeves, and Thomas H. Reynolds. MOOCs and Open Education around the
World. Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Gaved,M. (2013).
Innovating pedagogy 2013: Open University Innovation Report Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Whitelock, D. (2012).
Innovating pedagogy 2012: Open University Innovation Report 1. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Creative commons. Retrieved from http://www.elearn
space.org/KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf
Souter, K., Riddle, M., Sellers, W., & Keppell, M. (2011). Final report: Spaces for knowledge
generation. The Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). Retrieved from http://
documents.skgproject.com/skg-final-report.pdf
Watson, L. (2003). Lifelong learning in Australia (3/13). Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of
Australia.
Wheeler, S. (2010). Digital literacies. Retrieved from http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com.au/2010/11/
what-digital-literacies.html?q=digital+literacies