Collaborative Learning


                  Learning Theory and Pedagogical Use of Technology
                                     2012-09-27
                                   Venla Vallivaara
Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-27
During this lecture we will explore…

      • What is collaborative learning?
      • How does collaboration improve learning?
      • What is the main theoretical background of
        collaborative learning research?
      • What are the prerequisities for collaborative
        learning?
      • How can we support collaborative learning?


Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-27
What is collaborative learning?

          How does collaboration improve learning?




Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-27
What is collaborative learning?

       ” a situation in which two or more people learn or
       attempt to learn something together”

       ”A coordinated synchronous activity that is the result of a
       continued attempt to construct and maintain a shared
       conception of a problem”




       collaborative learning vs. cooperative
       learning
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and Computational
Approaches.
Roschelle, J. & Teasley S. (1996). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving.
              Venla Vallivaara
              LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
              University of Oulu
              2012-09-27
• When have you experienced
  truly collaborative learning?
• Do you think your learning was
  more efficient due to that
  collaboration? Why?
• What things or circumstances
  supported your collaboration in
  that situation?




       Venla Vallivaara
       LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
       University of Oulu
       2012-09-27
Why does collaboration
                              improve learning?
      • Opportunity to externalize your thinking and
            by that develop them further
      • Awareness of your own thoughts, realizing the
            differences between viewpoints
      • Motivation to explain your thougths when they
            are not clear enough for the others to
            understand
      • Discussing on more abstract level to find the
            common ground for the joint discussion and
            problem solving
      • Utilizing the variety of knowledge and
Häkkinen, P. & Arvaja, M. (1999). Kollaboratiivinen the group
            expertise within oppiminen teknologiaympäristöissä. Teoksessa Eteläpelto, A. & Tynjälä, P. Oppiminen ja
asiantuntijuus.
         Venla Vallivaara
         LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
         University of Oulu
         2012-09-27
What is the main theoretical background
              of collaborative learning research?




Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-27
Socio-constructivist
                                       approach on learning
       • Piaget  ”The Genevan School”
       • How social interactions affect individual cognitive
         development?
       • ”it is above all through interacting with others,
         coordinating his/her approaches to reality with those
         of others, that the individual masters new
         approaches”
       • Individual cognitive development as a result of spiral
         causality
       • Socio-cognitive conflicts
Doise, W. & Mugny, W. (1984). The Social Development of the Intellects.
Doise, W. (1990). The development of individual competencies through social interaction.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M, Balye, A. & O’Malley, S. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning.

              Venla Vallivaara
              LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
              University of Oulu
              2012-09-27
Socio-cultural
                                       approach on learning
       • Vygostsky  Socio-cultural perspective
       • Causal relationship between social interaction and
         individual cognitive change?

       • Genetic law of cultural development:
                – Inter-psychological processes (social speech)
                – Intra-psychological processes (inner speech)


       • Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)


Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society: The development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M, Balye, A. & O’Malley, S. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning
              Venla Vallivaara
              LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
              University of Oulu
              2012-09-27
Shared cognition
                                       approach on learning
       • Perspectives of sociology and anthropology shared
         cognition and situated cognition

       • Environments as a integral part of cognitive activity
                – Physical context
                – Social context


       • Culture, social communities, language, structure of
         social meanings and relationships


Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M, Balye, A. & O’Malley, S. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reimans (Edls)
learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier.
              Venla Vallivaara
              LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
              University of Oulu
              2012-09-27
• What are the challenges
  you have faced in
  collaborative learning
  situations?

• What things or
  circumstances have
  complicated or hindered
  the collaboration?

     Venla Vallivaara
     LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
     University of Oulu
     2012-09-27
What are the prerequisities
                           for collaborative learning?




Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-27
Prerequisities for
                          collaborative learning
• Equality and symmetry                                       • Individual prerequisities
• Grounding                                                   • If technology is used:
• Commitment                                                       – Support for fluent
• Certain way of discussing                                          interaction
  things                                                           – Diversity, flexibility
• Misconceptions and                                               – Usability
  disagreements allowed                                            – Reliability
• Open questions vs. factual
  questions
• Partly overlapping areas of
  expertise                                                    Häkkinen, P. & Arvaja, M. (1999). Kollaboratiivinen oppiminen
                                                               teknologiaympäristöissä. Teoksessa Eteläpelto, A. & Tynjälä, P.
                                                               Oppiminen ja asiantuntijuus..
    Venla Vallivaara
    LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
    University of Oulu
    2012-09-27
How can we support collaborative learning?

                    How can we script collaboration?




Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-27
Supporting collaborative
                                       learning
       • Because collaboration in learning situations does not
         often occur spontaneously, there’s a need for
         instructional support
       • With scaffolding we can support learners as they
         accomplish tasks that they would not be able to
         accomplish on their own (Zone of Proximal
         Development)
       • Scaffolds can provide support
               – On a content-related or conceptual level
               – Related to the interactive processes between students


Kollar, I; Fisher, F & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - A Conceptual Analysis. Educational Psychology Review 18:159-185.


             Venla Vallivaara
             LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
             University of Oulu
             2012-09-27
Supporting collaborative learning
                                 with technology

       • Computer-Supported
         Collaborative Learning
         (CSCL)
               – Technology can support
                 collaborative problem
                 solving by making thinking
                 visible and by fostering the
                 discussion during the
                 learning process
               – The cognitive load can be
                 shared with technology as
                 well as with other people
Häkkinen, P. & Arvaja, M. (1999). Kollaboratiivinen oppiminen teknologiaympäristöissä.
Teoksessa Eteläpelto, A. & Tynjälä, P. Oppiminen ja asiantuntijuus.

             Venla Vallivaara
             LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
             University of Oulu
             2012-09-27
Questions?

                     Comments?




Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-27

Theory collaborative learning

  • 1.
    Collaborative Learning Learning Theory and Pedagogical Use of Technology 2012-09-27 Venla Vallivaara Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 2.
    During this lecturewe will explore… • What is collaborative learning? • How does collaboration improve learning? • What is the main theoretical background of collaborative learning research? • What are the prerequisities for collaborative learning? • How can we support collaborative learning? Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 3.
    What is collaborativelearning? How does collaboration improve learning? Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 4.
    What is collaborativelearning? ” a situation in which two or more people learn or attempt to learn something together” ”A coordinated synchronous activity that is the result of a continued attempt to construct and maintain a shared conception of a problem” collaborative learning vs. cooperative learning Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Roschelle, J. & Teasley S. (1996). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 5.
    • When haveyou experienced truly collaborative learning? • Do you think your learning was more efficient due to that collaboration? Why? • What things or circumstances supported your collaboration in that situation? Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 6.
    Why does collaboration improve learning? • Opportunity to externalize your thinking and by that develop them further • Awareness of your own thoughts, realizing the differences between viewpoints • Motivation to explain your thougths when they are not clear enough for the others to understand • Discussing on more abstract level to find the common ground for the joint discussion and problem solving • Utilizing the variety of knowledge and Häkkinen, P. & Arvaja, M. (1999). Kollaboratiivinen the group expertise within oppiminen teknologiaympäristöissä. Teoksessa Eteläpelto, A. & Tynjälä, P. Oppiminen ja asiantuntijuus. Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 7.
    What is themain theoretical background of collaborative learning research? Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 8.
    Socio-constructivist approach on learning • Piaget  ”The Genevan School” • How social interactions affect individual cognitive development? • ”it is above all through interacting with others, coordinating his/her approaches to reality with those of others, that the individual masters new approaches” • Individual cognitive development as a result of spiral causality • Socio-cognitive conflicts Doise, W. & Mugny, W. (1984). The Social Development of the Intellects. Doise, W. (1990). The development of individual competencies through social interaction. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M, Balye, A. & O’Malley, S. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 9.
    Socio-cultural approach on learning • Vygostsky  Socio-cultural perspective • Causal relationship between social interaction and individual cognitive change? • Genetic law of cultural development: – Inter-psychological processes (social speech) – Intra-psychological processes (inner speech) • Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society: The development of Higher Psychological Processes. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M, Balye, A. & O’Malley, S. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 10.
    Shared cognition approach on learning • Perspectives of sociology and anthropology shared cognition and situated cognition • Environments as a integral part of cognitive activity – Physical context – Social context • Culture, social communities, language, structure of social meanings and relationships Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M, Balye, A. & O’Malley, S. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reimans (Edls) learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier. Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 11.
    • What arethe challenges you have faced in collaborative learning situations? • What things or circumstances have complicated or hindered the collaboration? Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 12.
    What are theprerequisities for collaborative learning? Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 13.
    Prerequisities for collaborative learning • Equality and symmetry • Individual prerequisities • Grounding • If technology is used: • Commitment – Support for fluent • Certain way of discussing interaction things – Diversity, flexibility • Misconceptions and – Usability disagreements allowed – Reliability • Open questions vs. factual questions • Partly overlapping areas of expertise Häkkinen, P. & Arvaja, M. (1999). Kollaboratiivinen oppiminen teknologiaympäristöissä. Teoksessa Eteläpelto, A. & Tynjälä, P. Oppiminen ja asiantuntijuus.. Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 14.
    How can wesupport collaborative learning? How can we script collaboration? Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 15.
    Supporting collaborative learning • Because collaboration in learning situations does not often occur spontaneously, there’s a need for instructional support • With scaffolding we can support learners as they accomplish tasks that they would not be able to accomplish on their own (Zone of Proximal Development) • Scaffolds can provide support – On a content-related or conceptual level – Related to the interactive processes between students Kollar, I; Fisher, F & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - A Conceptual Analysis. Educational Psychology Review 18:159-185. Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 16.
    Supporting collaborative learning with technology • Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) – Technology can support collaborative problem solving by making thinking visible and by fostering the discussion during the learning process – The cognitive load can be shared with technology as well as with other people Häkkinen, P. & Arvaja, M. (1999). Kollaboratiivinen oppiminen teknologiaympäristöissä. Teoksessa Eteläpelto, A. & Tynjälä, P. Oppiminen ja asiantuntijuus. Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27
  • 17.
    Questions? Comments? Venla Vallivaara LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2012-09-27

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Luennolle varattu aika: 10:00-10:45Aloitus: 3 min (10:00-10:03)
  • #4 Ensimmäinen osio: luento 3 min, keskustelutehtävä purkuineen 10 min (10:03-10:16)
  • #5 Konstruktivistinen oppimiskäsitys – tietoa ei voi siirtää suoraan opettajalta oppijalle, vaan oppilas itse aktiivisesti rakentaa tietoa. Aiemmat tiedot ja kokemukset ohjaa, aiemmat väärinymmärrykset haastetaan (käsitteellinen muutos). Mahdollisuus oppia monimutkaisiakin asioita opettamatta niitä suoraanOpettajan rooli: Oppimisprosessin suunnittelija ja ohjaaja. Asiantuntijaresurssi. Perinteisessä mallissa opettaja tekee suurimman oppimistyön
  • #7 Oppijalla mahdollisuus ulkoistaa ajatteluaan ja sitä kautta kehittää edelleen ideoitaan ja käsityksiäänOsallistujat tulevat tietoisiksi ajatteluprosesseistaan ja havaitessaan eroja omien ja toisten näkemysten välilläKeskustelu motivoi osallistujia selittämään ja selkeyttämään omia ajatuksiaan muille, elleivät ne vielä ole muiden mielestä tarpeeksi selkeitä tai tarkkojaIlmiöitä käsitellään abstraktimmalla tasolla, koska ryhmän tulee löytää yhteinen ja tarpeeksi yleinen pohja ongelmanratkaisulle
  • #8 Toinen osio: luento 3 min, keskustelutehtävä purkuineen 10 min (10:16-10:29)
  • #13 Kolmas osio: luento 3 min, (10:29-10:32)
  • #14 Tiedon ja toiminnan symmetrisyys ja tasavertaisuus Toimiva ryhmäytyminen (grounding)Yhteisöllinen tiedonrakentelu edellyttää sitoutumista koordinoituun, tavoitteelliseen ja jaettuun ongelmanratkaisuunAvoimet kysymykset vs. faktakysymyksetSijaa myös väärinymmärryksille ja erimielisyyksilleOsittain päällekkäinen asiantuntijuus. Tarpeeksi yhteistä ymmärrystä, mutta riittävän erilaiset näkökulmat.Tavoitteena tutkiva puhe (vs. kiistelevä tai kumulatiivinen puhe)Yksilötasolla ryhmän jäseneltä vaaditaan mm. motivaatiota yhteistyöhön, riittäviä opiskelutaitoja, rohkeutta ja avoimuuttaTeknologian tarjottava joustavat monipuoliset välineet vuorovaikutukseen ja ryhmän työskentelyyn. Toimivuus, helppous ja luotettavuus tärkeällä sijallaOhjaaminen ja opettaminen eivät ole kollaboraatiotajoka edellyttää muiden yhteisön jäsenten toiminnan ja ajattelun tapojen tuntemusta Kaikki ryhmässä opiskelu ei ole yhteisöllistä oppimista. Ryhmässä työskenteleminen ei takaa automaattisesti laadukasta ja syvällistä oppimista sekä parempia oppimistuloksiaKaikki oppimisen ja ongelmanratkaisun muodot eivät ole tehokkaimmillaan ryhmässä – myös itsenäistä opiskelua tarvitaan.Tehtävä voi jakautua siten, että yksittäisen oppilaan kokemus osista muodostuvasta kokonaisuudesta hämärtyyVääränlainen sosiaalinen ilmapiiri tukahduttaa ideoinnin, eivätkä kaikki uskalla kertoa vapaasti ennakkokäsityksistään, ideoistaan ja näkökulmistaanTavoitteena tutkiva puhe (vs. kiistelevä tai kumulatiivinen puhe)Vallitsevan oppimiskulttuurin tuomat rajoitukset todella yhteisöllistä oppimista tukevien oppimisympäristöjen luomiseeen
  • #15 Neljäs osio: luento 3 min, esimerkit kursseilta yht. 10 min (10:32-10:45)