Sintayehu Ayanaw ( R3 )
JUDO, 2022
Orbital Implants and Ocular Prosthesis
02/02/2024
1
Outline
 Introduction
 Anophthalmic socket surgeries
 Orbital implants
 Ocular prosthesis
 Complications of OIs and prosthesis
 Summary
 References
02/02/2024
2
Introduction
02/02/2024
3
 Anophthalmia – Without eye
 Anophthalmic socket- an orbit not containing eyeball
 Could be acquired or congenital
 Acquired is more common following:
 Enucleation
 Evisceration
 Exenteration
…Cont
 Eye removal can be done:
 To safeguard life
 To preserve vision in the fellow eye
 To enhance comfort and cosmoses
02/02/2024
4
…Cont
 There are 3 ways of removing the eye:
 Evisceration
 Enucleation
 Exenteretion
02/02/2024
5
Indications
02/02/2024
6
 Enucleation
 Blind painful eye
 Intraocular tumor
 Severe trauma
 severe phthisis bulbi
 severe microphthalmia
 cosmetic deformity
 Evisceration
 As for enucleation except for
intraocular tumor and risk of SO
 Exenteration
 Cutaneous tumors with
orbital invasion
 Lacrimal gland tumors
 Other orbital
malignancy
 Mucormycosis
…Cont
 Loss of an eye may cause degraded self image and
depression.
 The transition from binocular to monocular vision is
challenging to the pt.
02/02/2024
7
…Cont
 The aim of anophthalmic socket surgery:
 Maximize orbital implant volume
 Optimal eye lid contour, volume and tone
 Establish deep fornixes to retain prosthesis
 Transmit motility from implant to prosthesis
 Achieve comfort and symmetry
02/02/2024
8
Orbital Implants
 Ideal properties of orbital implants:
 Mimics globe
 Replaces sufficient volume
 Minimal rate of exposure, extrusion and infection
 Non antigenic, biologically inert
 Provides socket mobility transferred to prosthesis
 Light wt and simple in construction
 Completely buried and affordable
02/02/2024
9
…Cont
 Implants may be classified as:
Inert materials(e.g., Glass, silicone, or methylmethacrylate)
Biointegrated materials(e.g., hydroxyapatite, porous
polyethylene, Al2O3
Biogenic-e.g., Dermis-fat graft.
02/02/2024
10
…Cont
 Orbital implants can be also be classified as
Porous(hydroxyapatite, porous polyethylene, Al2O3) or
Nonporous(silicone, polymethylmethacrylate)
 In either category, the implants are
Non-integrated, Quasi-integrated, or Integrated
02/02/2024
11
…Cont
 Porous implants have rough surface.
 Wrapping is possible with autogenous fascia, cadaver
sclera/fascia, bovin pericardium, polyglactin mesh
 Polyglactin mesh associated with high exposure rate.
 Cadaver tissue: transmission of viral infections & prion
despite screening.
02/02/2024
12
Nonintegrated implants
 Do not allow direct/indirect integration with orbital structure
or prosthesis
 Commonly used: PMMA and silicone sphere
02/02/2024
13
PMMA
 Ideal material to fabricate IOL, rigid and semirigid contact
lenses.
 To manufacture both ocular prosthesis and implant.
 Its also used to manufacture majority of quasi-integrated
implants
02/02/2024
14
Silicone
 A suitable material due to its properties
 Episcleral implants for buckling
 Non porous silicone sphere preferred if pegging not planned
 Non porous silicone sphere also used in infants, preschool
and in age > 65
02/02/2024
15
…Cont
Advantages Disadvantages
 Inexpensive
 Technically easy
 Well tolerated
 Few complications
 Smooth surface
 Wrapping in sclera and
attaching EOMs to sclera
 Poor motility if not
wrapped
02/02/2024
16
Semi- integrated implants:
 Indirect integration with orbital structures but not with
prosthesis
 Commonly used: Allen, Iowa, Universal, Castroviejo
02/02/2024
17
…Cont
Advantages Disadvantages
 Inexpensive
 Good motility
 Irregular anterior surface
 Discomfort
 High rate of erosion and
extrusion
 Customised prosthesis
required to fit its shape
02/02/2024
18
Biointegrated:
 Allows fibrovascular ingrowth of orbital tissues for full
integration
 Usually porous: HA, polyethylene, aluminium oxide alpha
sphere
 Advantage : Can be pegged
 Disadvantage : expensive, not easily available
02/02/2024
19
Biogenic
 An autograft/ allograft of natural tissue with direct biological
integration with orbital structures but not with prosthesis.
 Commonly used: dermis fat graft and mucous membrane
graft
 Dermis- fat graft:
 Used after both enucleation and evisceration
 Can be used as primary or secondary implants
 Useful particularly in the presence of conjunctiva shortening
02/02/2024
20
HA
 Discovered by Perry in 1885.
 Porous structure and chemical nature of human cancellous
bone.
 Produced by marine corral species
 Comprising of calcium phosphate
 Fibrovascular ingrowth: reduces chance of migration and
extrusion
02/02/2024
21
…Cont
A B
C
02/02/2024
22
…Cont
Advantage Disadvantage
 Good motility
 Good structural
framework for pegging
 Brittle nature
 Different wrapping
material required
02/02/2024
23
Polyethylene Implants
 Polymerization of ethylene molecule
 Porous with smooth surface: 150-400 microns
 Biocompatible and allows fibro vascular ingrowth
 Not brittle and muscle can be attached without
wrapping
 Synthetic form: Medpore
02/02/2024
24
Aluminium Oxide Implant
 Biocompatible, bio inert, nontoxic, non allergenic, porous
 Easy insertion in to the socket and do not cling to
surrounding tissue
 Easily drilled without crumbling
 Rapid and complete fibrovascularizaton
 Light wt and low exposure rate
02/02/2024
25
…Cont
A
B
C
02/02/2024
26
Expandable Orbital Implants
 Stimulate orbital growth.
 In congenital anophthalmos/microphthalmos
 Has anterior injection portal, rectus muscle
placement groove and 4 independent expandable
quadrants.
 Promising choice
02/02/2024
27
OTE
Orbital Growth
 Removal of an eye in children has a unique problem.
 Orbital growth my retarded after enucleation.
 Implant size in children: 2 mm less than the volume
of enucleated eye.
 Dermis-fat graft grow with growing orbit in
children.
02/02/2024
28
Motility
 Attaching the EOM with implant.
 Motility peg which can be placed after 6-12 months of eye
removal.
 Pegging allows direct transmission of movement from
implant to prosthesis.
 Granuloma formation and peg instability may require peg
removal
 Polycarbonate and Titanium types
02/02/2024
29
Post Pegging complications:
 Increased discharge
 Recurrent pyogenic granuloma
 Implant exposure, infection
 Tissue overgrowth and clicking
02/02/2024
30
Orbital volume
 Adult orbital volume achieved at 12-14 years old.
 At age of 5 years 80% of adult volume achieved.
 Orbital soft tissue volume is critical for orbital bone growth.
 Larger orbital implant should be placed in children following
enucleation.
 OIs volume can be determined preop or interaop
02/02/2024
31
…Cont
02/02/2024
32
…Cont
 Insufficient volume replacement often results in
 an abnormally deep superior sulcus, upper eyelid ptosis,
&enophthalmos
 may require a larger than desirable prosthesis
 Larger prostheses often result in
 progressive lower eyelid laxity and
 have a higher exposure rate, and
 hinder fitting of an acceptable custom prosthesis
02/02/2024
33
…Cont
 Ideally, 70–80% of the volume of normal globe should be
replaced with the orbital implant
 In most adults,
 20–22 mm implants used following enucleation
 18–20 mm implants following evisceration.
 For pediatric age 16–18 mm, depending on the patient's age
and orbital bone development
02/02/2024
34
Orbital Implant Selection in Adults
 Implant cost, insurance reimbursement, marketing pressures,
age, healthy status of the pt.
 In healthy, 15-65 years old pts  porous implants
 A quasi integrated such as mounded PMMA/MEDPOR
are alternative
 Non porous, wrapped implants may be another option if
future pegging not planned.
 Non porous implants may be preferred in pts who are 7th
decade or beyond, immunocompromised, prevous hx of
radiotheraphy to periorbital structures
02/02/2024
35
Implant selection children
 Children <5 years of ageWrapped non porous implant,
Dermis-fat graft.
 Implant exchange with larger porous OI can be considered in
teenage years.
 Between 5-15 years of ageNon porous implants either
PMMA mounded or wrapped sphere.
 Pegged implants in age < 15 years are not generally
recommended.
02/02/2024
36
Orbital Implant wrapping:
 To enhance implant placement with in the soft tissue of the
socket.
 Facilitate precise fixation of rectus muscles to implant
surface.
 Materials for wrapping includes:
 Human donor sclera
 Specially processed human donor pericardium, fascia lata,
 Processed bovine pericardium
 Autologous temporalis fascia, fascia lata, rectus abdominus sheath,
posterior auricular muscle complex
 Microporous Expanded Polytetraflouroethylene
 Undyed polyglactin 910 mesh( vicryl mesh)
02/02/2024
37
…Cont
02/02/2024
38
Post Surgical Conformers
 It is used till prosthesis placed.
 Important to keep the fornices formed.
 Prevent socket contracture
 Has holes for drainage
 There are also cosmetic conformers
 Different size
02/02/2024
39
Ocular Prosthesis
 Its an artificial eye that replaces absent natural eye.
 Indications: anophthalomos, microophthalmia, phthisis bulbi,
disfigured blind eye.
 Can be PMMA, Silicone or acrylic
 Types: ocular or orbital
 It can be also classified as:
 Ready made
 Partially customized
 Fully customized
02/02/2024
40
…Cont
02/02/2024
41
Cosmetic Contact Lenses
 Are intended to disguise the eye with unacceptable
appearance.
 Classified as: scleral shell, soft corneoscleral CLs, rigid
corneal CLs
 Scleral shell:
 For blind eye which is shrunken or with uneven surface
 Should be worn only while awake
02/02/2024
42
…Cont
 Soft corneoscleral lenses:
 Made of d/t types of hydrogels
 To hide corneal scar or iris defect
 Used in normal sized with fairly regular surface
 Can be fully occlusive or can have clear pupil
 Should worn only while awake
02/02/2024
43
…Cont
 Rigid lenses
 Made of PMMA
 Their fabrication process and external features
are similar to definitive prosthesis
02/02/2024
44
Orbito-facial Prostheses
 Orbital prosthesis restores the tissues that have been
removed, including eyelids and an eye, but it does not blink or
move.
 Various methods of auxiliary retention for facial prostheses
 A prosthesis attached to an eyeglasses frame,
 To the periorbital area (with adhesive),or
 To an osseointegrated implant, which is facilitated with magnetic
posts
02/02/2024
45
…Cont
02/02/2024
46
Maintenance Of Ocular Prosthesis
 Both ocularist and ophthalmologist should follow the patient.
 Handle and remove the prosthesis as little as possible
 The pt should wash their hands before handling the
prosthesis
 Monthly removal and cleaning
 Polishing yearly and replacement every 5 years
 Ocular lubricants in dry socket
02/02/2024
47
Anophthalmic Socket Complications
Deep Superior Sulcus
 Caused by insufficient orbital volume
 Management includes:
 Placement of subperiosteal secondary implant
along orbital floor
 Replacement of original implant with larger one
 Modification of ocular prosthesis
 DFG
02/02/2024
48
Giant Fornix Syndrome
 Superior conjunctival fonix may be too deep  build up of
mucous and debris  chronic discharge and infection.
 Management: conjunctival resection
Conjunctival Cyst
 Due to epithelial migration beneath the surface.
 Poor wound closure during enucleation
 Treatment not usually required unless it interferes with
prosthesis wear
02/02/2024
49
Giant Papillary Conjunctivitis
 Due to mechanical friction b/n palpebral conjunctiva and the
prosthesis.
 Presented with constant mucous discharge with stringy
consistency.
 Treatment:
 Topical steroids
 Occasionally prosthesis modification
02/02/2024
50
Implant Exposure and Extrusion
 Formation of pyogenic granuloma is indicative of implant
exposure.
 Exposure may due to:
Post op infection
Poor wound healing
Poorly fitting prosthesis or conformer
Pressure points b/n implant and prosthesis
Compromised vascularity
02/02/2024
51
…Cont
 Exposed implants are subject to infection.
 Management:
 Cover the exposure with scleral patch graft or autoginous dermis- fat
graft
 Deeply seeded implants with infection  removal of the implant
followed by dermis-fat graft
02/02/2024
52
Contracture of the Fornices
 Preventing contracted fornices includes:
 Preserve as much conjunctiva as possible
 Limiting dissection in the fornices
 Placing rectus muscles in normal anatomic position
 Wearing conformer in immidiate post op period
02/02/2024
53
Contracted Socket
 Sockets are considered contracted when the fornices are too
small to retain the prosthesis.
 Its caused by:
Radiation therapy for malignancy
Extrusion of orbital implants
Severe initial injury ( alkali burns, extensive laceration )
Poor surgical technique
Multiple ocular or socket oprations
Removal of conformer or prosthesis for prolonged period
02/02/2024
54
Grading of Socket Contracture
 Grade 1:
 Minimal or no actual contracture
 Inability to retain prosthesis for long time
 Horizontal lid laxity
 Retraction of lower fornix
02/02/2024
55
…Cont
 Grade 2:
 Mild contracture of upper and/lower fornices
 Inability to wear the prosthesis
 Pt complain disfigurement
02/02/2024
56
…Cont
Grade 3:
 more advanced scarring than grade 2
 cicatrization involves upper and lower fornices
 wearing prosthesis is impossible
Grade 4:
 severe phimosis of palpebral fissure both vertically and
horizontally.
 recurrent cases and irradiated sockets
02/02/2024
57
…Cont
Management
 Minimal/mild contracture: Z-plasy/local conjunctival flap,
horizontal lid laxity thightening, graft
 Modrate contracture: split thickness mucosal or full thickness
conjunctival autograft, AMG
 Contracture with volume loss: DFG
 Severe contracture: extermely difficult to repair, space
occupying alloplastic materials ( silicone, polyethylene )
02/02/2024
58
Anophthalmic Ectropion
 May result from loosening lower lid support
 Frequent removal or the use of larger prosthesis
 Treatment:
Tightening of lateral or medial canthal tendon
 Ectropion repair + deepening of inferior fornix by
recessing the inferior retractor muscle and mucous
membrane grafting
02/02/2024
59
Anophthalmic Ptosis
 Can be caused by:
Suprotemporal migration of sphere implant
Cicatricial tissue in upper fornix
Damage to levator muscle or nerve
02/02/2024
60
…Cont
 Management:
 Small ptosis  prosthesis modification, Muller muscle-
conjunctiva resection
 Greater amount  levator aponeurosis advancement
 Frontalis suspension  less/ not useful at all
02/02/2024
61
Lash Margin Entropion
 Lash margin entropion, trichiasis and ptosis of lashes are
common.
 Caused by: fornix contracture, cicatricial tissue near the lash
margin
 Treatment:
 Horizontal tarsal incision and rotation
 Splitting of eyelid margin at gray line with mucous
membrane graft in severe cases
02/02/2024
62
Summary
 The three ways of eye removal and their indication.
 The classifications of orbital implants.
 The advent of porous OIs has greatly advanced the field of
anophthalmic surgery.
 OIs are available in spherical, mounded, egg, and conical
shape
 Implant selection depends on several factors: age, medical hx,
cost, availability, and surgeons preference.
 Orbital implants Conformer  Ocular prosthesis
02/02/2024
63
…Cont
 Pts younger than 5 years of age typically receive non porous
implant and require exchange later in life.
 Older paediatric pts may do well with porous implants.
 Wrapping facilitates implant insertion and rectus muscle
attachment to the implant.
 Polyglactin 910 ( vicryl mesh ) is simple to use, readily
available, permit early fibrovascularization.
 Porous implants can be coupled with overlying prosthesis
with pegging system.
 Anophthalmic surgery complications and management.
 Use plastic protective eye glass for the other eye.
02/02/2024
64
References
 Essential in Ophthalmology, Oculoplastic and Orbit, R.F.
Guttaf and J.A Katowitz
 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Oculofacial plastic
and Orbital Surgery, 2020-21
 Kanski Clinical Ophthalmology- Systematic-Aproach-9th ed
 Review Orbital Implants and Prosthesis-Acta Biomater, 2014
 Smith and Nese’s Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 4th ed
02/02/2024
65
THANK YOU !
02/02/2024
66

ocularsssssssssss implant/prosthesis.pptx

  • 1.
    Sintayehu Ayanaw (R3 ) JUDO, 2022 Orbital Implants and Ocular Prosthesis 02/02/2024 1
  • 2.
    Outline  Introduction  Anophthalmicsocket surgeries  Orbital implants  Ocular prosthesis  Complications of OIs and prosthesis  Summary  References 02/02/2024 2
  • 3.
    Introduction 02/02/2024 3  Anophthalmia –Without eye  Anophthalmic socket- an orbit not containing eyeball  Could be acquired or congenital  Acquired is more common following:  Enucleation  Evisceration  Exenteration
  • 4.
    …Cont  Eye removalcan be done:  To safeguard life  To preserve vision in the fellow eye  To enhance comfort and cosmoses 02/02/2024 4
  • 5.
    …Cont  There are3 ways of removing the eye:  Evisceration  Enucleation  Exenteretion 02/02/2024 5
  • 6.
    Indications 02/02/2024 6  Enucleation  Blindpainful eye  Intraocular tumor  Severe trauma  severe phthisis bulbi  severe microphthalmia  cosmetic deformity  Evisceration  As for enucleation except for intraocular tumor and risk of SO  Exenteration  Cutaneous tumors with orbital invasion  Lacrimal gland tumors  Other orbital malignancy  Mucormycosis
  • 7.
    …Cont  Loss ofan eye may cause degraded self image and depression.  The transition from binocular to monocular vision is challenging to the pt. 02/02/2024 7
  • 8.
    …Cont  The aimof anophthalmic socket surgery:  Maximize orbital implant volume  Optimal eye lid contour, volume and tone  Establish deep fornixes to retain prosthesis  Transmit motility from implant to prosthesis  Achieve comfort and symmetry 02/02/2024 8
  • 9.
    Orbital Implants  Idealproperties of orbital implants:  Mimics globe  Replaces sufficient volume  Minimal rate of exposure, extrusion and infection  Non antigenic, biologically inert  Provides socket mobility transferred to prosthesis  Light wt and simple in construction  Completely buried and affordable 02/02/2024 9
  • 10.
    …Cont  Implants maybe classified as: Inert materials(e.g., Glass, silicone, or methylmethacrylate) Biointegrated materials(e.g., hydroxyapatite, porous polyethylene, Al2O3 Biogenic-e.g., Dermis-fat graft. 02/02/2024 10
  • 11.
    …Cont  Orbital implantscan be also be classified as Porous(hydroxyapatite, porous polyethylene, Al2O3) or Nonporous(silicone, polymethylmethacrylate)  In either category, the implants are Non-integrated, Quasi-integrated, or Integrated 02/02/2024 11
  • 12.
    …Cont  Porous implantshave rough surface.  Wrapping is possible with autogenous fascia, cadaver sclera/fascia, bovin pericardium, polyglactin mesh  Polyglactin mesh associated with high exposure rate.  Cadaver tissue: transmission of viral infections & prion despite screening. 02/02/2024 12
  • 13.
    Nonintegrated implants  Donot allow direct/indirect integration with orbital structure or prosthesis  Commonly used: PMMA and silicone sphere 02/02/2024 13
  • 14.
    PMMA  Ideal materialto fabricate IOL, rigid and semirigid contact lenses.  To manufacture both ocular prosthesis and implant.  Its also used to manufacture majority of quasi-integrated implants 02/02/2024 14
  • 15.
    Silicone  A suitablematerial due to its properties  Episcleral implants for buckling  Non porous silicone sphere preferred if pegging not planned  Non porous silicone sphere also used in infants, preschool and in age > 65 02/02/2024 15
  • 16.
    …Cont Advantages Disadvantages  Inexpensive Technically easy  Well tolerated  Few complications  Smooth surface  Wrapping in sclera and attaching EOMs to sclera  Poor motility if not wrapped 02/02/2024 16
  • 17.
    Semi- integrated implants: Indirect integration with orbital structures but not with prosthesis  Commonly used: Allen, Iowa, Universal, Castroviejo 02/02/2024 17
  • 18.
    …Cont Advantages Disadvantages  Inexpensive Good motility  Irregular anterior surface  Discomfort  High rate of erosion and extrusion  Customised prosthesis required to fit its shape 02/02/2024 18
  • 19.
    Biointegrated:  Allows fibrovascularingrowth of orbital tissues for full integration  Usually porous: HA, polyethylene, aluminium oxide alpha sphere  Advantage : Can be pegged  Disadvantage : expensive, not easily available 02/02/2024 19
  • 20.
    Biogenic  An autograft/allograft of natural tissue with direct biological integration with orbital structures but not with prosthesis.  Commonly used: dermis fat graft and mucous membrane graft  Dermis- fat graft:  Used after both enucleation and evisceration  Can be used as primary or secondary implants  Useful particularly in the presence of conjunctiva shortening 02/02/2024 20
  • 21.
    HA  Discovered byPerry in 1885.  Porous structure and chemical nature of human cancellous bone.  Produced by marine corral species  Comprising of calcium phosphate  Fibrovascular ingrowth: reduces chance of migration and extrusion 02/02/2024 21
  • 22.
  • 23.
    …Cont Advantage Disadvantage  Goodmotility  Good structural framework for pegging  Brittle nature  Different wrapping material required 02/02/2024 23
  • 24.
    Polyethylene Implants  Polymerizationof ethylene molecule  Porous with smooth surface: 150-400 microns  Biocompatible and allows fibro vascular ingrowth  Not brittle and muscle can be attached without wrapping  Synthetic form: Medpore 02/02/2024 24
  • 25.
    Aluminium Oxide Implant Biocompatible, bio inert, nontoxic, non allergenic, porous  Easy insertion in to the socket and do not cling to surrounding tissue  Easily drilled without crumbling  Rapid and complete fibrovascularizaton  Light wt and low exposure rate 02/02/2024 25
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Expandable Orbital Implants Stimulate orbital growth.  In congenital anophthalmos/microphthalmos  Has anterior injection portal, rectus muscle placement groove and 4 independent expandable quadrants.  Promising choice 02/02/2024 27 OTE
  • 28.
    Orbital Growth  Removalof an eye in children has a unique problem.  Orbital growth my retarded after enucleation.  Implant size in children: 2 mm less than the volume of enucleated eye.  Dermis-fat graft grow with growing orbit in children. 02/02/2024 28
  • 29.
    Motility  Attaching theEOM with implant.  Motility peg which can be placed after 6-12 months of eye removal.  Pegging allows direct transmission of movement from implant to prosthesis.  Granuloma formation and peg instability may require peg removal  Polycarbonate and Titanium types 02/02/2024 29
  • 30.
    Post Pegging complications: Increased discharge  Recurrent pyogenic granuloma  Implant exposure, infection  Tissue overgrowth and clicking 02/02/2024 30
  • 31.
    Orbital volume  Adultorbital volume achieved at 12-14 years old.  At age of 5 years 80% of adult volume achieved.  Orbital soft tissue volume is critical for orbital bone growth.  Larger orbital implant should be placed in children following enucleation.  OIs volume can be determined preop or interaop 02/02/2024 31
  • 32.
  • 33.
    …Cont  Insufficient volumereplacement often results in  an abnormally deep superior sulcus, upper eyelid ptosis, &enophthalmos  may require a larger than desirable prosthesis  Larger prostheses often result in  progressive lower eyelid laxity and  have a higher exposure rate, and  hinder fitting of an acceptable custom prosthesis 02/02/2024 33
  • 34.
    …Cont  Ideally, 70–80%of the volume of normal globe should be replaced with the orbital implant  In most adults,  20–22 mm implants used following enucleation  18–20 mm implants following evisceration.  For pediatric age 16–18 mm, depending on the patient's age and orbital bone development 02/02/2024 34
  • 35.
    Orbital Implant Selectionin Adults  Implant cost, insurance reimbursement, marketing pressures, age, healthy status of the pt.  In healthy, 15-65 years old pts  porous implants  A quasi integrated such as mounded PMMA/MEDPOR are alternative  Non porous, wrapped implants may be another option if future pegging not planned.  Non porous implants may be preferred in pts who are 7th decade or beyond, immunocompromised, prevous hx of radiotheraphy to periorbital structures 02/02/2024 35
  • 36.
    Implant selection children Children <5 years of ageWrapped non porous implant, Dermis-fat graft.  Implant exchange with larger porous OI can be considered in teenage years.  Between 5-15 years of ageNon porous implants either PMMA mounded or wrapped sphere.  Pegged implants in age < 15 years are not generally recommended. 02/02/2024 36
  • 37.
    Orbital Implant wrapping: To enhance implant placement with in the soft tissue of the socket.  Facilitate precise fixation of rectus muscles to implant surface.  Materials for wrapping includes:  Human donor sclera  Specially processed human donor pericardium, fascia lata,  Processed bovine pericardium  Autologous temporalis fascia, fascia lata, rectus abdominus sheath, posterior auricular muscle complex  Microporous Expanded Polytetraflouroethylene  Undyed polyglactin 910 mesh( vicryl mesh) 02/02/2024 37
  • 38.
  • 39.
    Post Surgical Conformers It is used till prosthesis placed.  Important to keep the fornices formed.  Prevent socket contracture  Has holes for drainage  There are also cosmetic conformers  Different size 02/02/2024 39
  • 40.
    Ocular Prosthesis  Itsan artificial eye that replaces absent natural eye.  Indications: anophthalomos, microophthalmia, phthisis bulbi, disfigured blind eye.  Can be PMMA, Silicone or acrylic  Types: ocular or orbital  It can be also classified as:  Ready made  Partially customized  Fully customized 02/02/2024 40
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Cosmetic Contact Lenses Are intended to disguise the eye with unacceptable appearance.  Classified as: scleral shell, soft corneoscleral CLs, rigid corneal CLs  Scleral shell:  For blind eye which is shrunken or with uneven surface  Should be worn only while awake 02/02/2024 42
  • 43.
    …Cont  Soft corneosclerallenses:  Made of d/t types of hydrogels  To hide corneal scar or iris defect  Used in normal sized with fairly regular surface  Can be fully occlusive or can have clear pupil  Should worn only while awake 02/02/2024 43
  • 44.
    …Cont  Rigid lenses Made of PMMA  Their fabrication process and external features are similar to definitive prosthesis 02/02/2024 44
  • 45.
    Orbito-facial Prostheses  Orbitalprosthesis restores the tissues that have been removed, including eyelids and an eye, but it does not blink or move.  Various methods of auxiliary retention for facial prostheses  A prosthesis attached to an eyeglasses frame,  To the periorbital area (with adhesive),or  To an osseointegrated implant, which is facilitated with magnetic posts 02/02/2024 45
  • 46.
  • 47.
    Maintenance Of OcularProsthesis  Both ocularist and ophthalmologist should follow the patient.  Handle and remove the prosthesis as little as possible  The pt should wash their hands before handling the prosthesis  Monthly removal and cleaning  Polishing yearly and replacement every 5 years  Ocular lubricants in dry socket 02/02/2024 47
  • 48.
    Anophthalmic Socket Complications DeepSuperior Sulcus  Caused by insufficient orbital volume  Management includes:  Placement of subperiosteal secondary implant along orbital floor  Replacement of original implant with larger one  Modification of ocular prosthesis  DFG 02/02/2024 48
  • 49.
    Giant Fornix Syndrome Superior conjunctival fonix may be too deep  build up of mucous and debris  chronic discharge and infection.  Management: conjunctival resection Conjunctival Cyst  Due to epithelial migration beneath the surface.  Poor wound closure during enucleation  Treatment not usually required unless it interferes with prosthesis wear 02/02/2024 49
  • 50.
    Giant Papillary Conjunctivitis Due to mechanical friction b/n palpebral conjunctiva and the prosthesis.  Presented with constant mucous discharge with stringy consistency.  Treatment:  Topical steroids  Occasionally prosthesis modification 02/02/2024 50
  • 51.
    Implant Exposure andExtrusion  Formation of pyogenic granuloma is indicative of implant exposure.  Exposure may due to: Post op infection Poor wound healing Poorly fitting prosthesis or conformer Pressure points b/n implant and prosthesis Compromised vascularity 02/02/2024 51
  • 52.
    …Cont  Exposed implantsare subject to infection.  Management:  Cover the exposure with scleral patch graft or autoginous dermis- fat graft  Deeply seeded implants with infection  removal of the implant followed by dermis-fat graft 02/02/2024 52
  • 53.
    Contracture of theFornices  Preventing contracted fornices includes:  Preserve as much conjunctiva as possible  Limiting dissection in the fornices  Placing rectus muscles in normal anatomic position  Wearing conformer in immidiate post op period 02/02/2024 53
  • 54.
    Contracted Socket  Socketsare considered contracted when the fornices are too small to retain the prosthesis.  Its caused by: Radiation therapy for malignancy Extrusion of orbital implants Severe initial injury ( alkali burns, extensive laceration ) Poor surgical technique Multiple ocular or socket oprations Removal of conformer or prosthesis for prolonged period 02/02/2024 54
  • 55.
    Grading of SocketContracture  Grade 1:  Minimal or no actual contracture  Inability to retain prosthesis for long time  Horizontal lid laxity  Retraction of lower fornix 02/02/2024 55
  • 56.
    …Cont  Grade 2: Mild contracture of upper and/lower fornices  Inability to wear the prosthesis  Pt complain disfigurement 02/02/2024 56
  • 57.
    …Cont Grade 3:  moreadvanced scarring than grade 2  cicatrization involves upper and lower fornices  wearing prosthesis is impossible Grade 4:  severe phimosis of palpebral fissure both vertically and horizontally.  recurrent cases and irradiated sockets 02/02/2024 57
  • 58.
    …Cont Management  Minimal/mild contracture:Z-plasy/local conjunctival flap, horizontal lid laxity thightening, graft  Modrate contracture: split thickness mucosal or full thickness conjunctival autograft, AMG  Contracture with volume loss: DFG  Severe contracture: extermely difficult to repair, space occupying alloplastic materials ( silicone, polyethylene ) 02/02/2024 58
  • 59.
    Anophthalmic Ectropion  Mayresult from loosening lower lid support  Frequent removal or the use of larger prosthesis  Treatment: Tightening of lateral or medial canthal tendon  Ectropion repair + deepening of inferior fornix by recessing the inferior retractor muscle and mucous membrane grafting 02/02/2024 59
  • 60.
    Anophthalmic Ptosis  Canbe caused by: Suprotemporal migration of sphere implant Cicatricial tissue in upper fornix Damage to levator muscle or nerve 02/02/2024 60
  • 61.
    …Cont  Management:  Smallptosis  prosthesis modification, Muller muscle- conjunctiva resection  Greater amount  levator aponeurosis advancement  Frontalis suspension  less/ not useful at all 02/02/2024 61
  • 62.
    Lash Margin Entropion Lash margin entropion, trichiasis and ptosis of lashes are common.  Caused by: fornix contracture, cicatricial tissue near the lash margin  Treatment:  Horizontal tarsal incision and rotation  Splitting of eyelid margin at gray line with mucous membrane graft in severe cases 02/02/2024 62
  • 63.
    Summary  The threeways of eye removal and their indication.  The classifications of orbital implants.  The advent of porous OIs has greatly advanced the field of anophthalmic surgery.  OIs are available in spherical, mounded, egg, and conical shape  Implant selection depends on several factors: age, medical hx, cost, availability, and surgeons preference.  Orbital implants Conformer  Ocular prosthesis 02/02/2024 63
  • 64.
    …Cont  Pts youngerthan 5 years of age typically receive non porous implant and require exchange later in life.  Older paediatric pts may do well with porous implants.  Wrapping facilitates implant insertion and rectus muscle attachment to the implant.  Polyglactin 910 ( vicryl mesh ) is simple to use, readily available, permit early fibrovascularization.  Porous implants can be coupled with overlying prosthesis with pegging system.  Anophthalmic surgery complications and management.  Use plastic protective eye glass for the other eye. 02/02/2024 64
  • 65.
    References  Essential inOphthalmology, Oculoplastic and Orbit, R.F. Guttaf and J.A Katowitz  American Academy of Ophthalmology, Oculofacial plastic and Orbital Surgery, 2020-21  Kanski Clinical Ophthalmology- Systematic-Aproach-9th ed  Review Orbital Implants and Prosthesis-Acta Biomater, 2014  Smith and Nese’s Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 4th ed 02/02/2024 65
  • 66.