Sections:
1. Fundamentals of Manual Assembly Lines
2. Analysis of Single Model Assembly Lines
3. Line Balancing Algorithms
4. Mixed Model Assembly Lines
5. Workstation Considerations
6. Other Considerations in Assembly Line Design
7. Alternative Assembly Systems
Introduction ,FMS Equipment,FMS Layouts ,Analysis Methods for FMS,,advantages of fms,comparison of fms to conventional methods,applications.Benefits of fms.
Introduction ,FMS Equipment,FMS Layouts ,Analysis Methods for FMS,,advantages of fms,comparison of fms to conventional methods,applications.Benefits of fms.
What is process planning .Difficulties in traditional process planning,CAPP Model,Types of CAPP ,1.Retrieval type CAPP (variant) systems.
2.Generative CAPP systems.
3.Hybrid CAPP systems.
Process planning system , Machinability data systems , Benefits of CAPP
PPCE unit 2 (ME8793 – PROCESS PLANNING AND COST ESTIMATION )TAMILMECHKIT
UNIT 2 – PROCESS PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Process parameters calculation for various production processes-Selection jigs and fixtures- Selection of quality assurance methods - Set of documents for process planning-Economics of process planning- case studies
Sections:
1. Fundamentals of Manual Assembly Lines
2. Analysis of Single Model Assembly Lines
3. Line Balancing Algorithms
4. Mixed Model Assembly Lines
5. Workstation Considerations
6. Other Considerations in Assembly Line Design
7. Alternative Assembly Systems
GT Definition,Implementing Group Technology (GT),four methods GT, 1.OPTIZ PARTS CLASSIFICATION AND CODING SYSTEM,2.MICLASS coding system ,CODE MDSI System,BENEFITS OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY and limitations.
What is process planning .Difficulties in traditional process planning,CAPP Model,Types of CAPP ,1.Retrieval type CAPP (variant) systems.
2.Generative CAPP systems.
3.Hybrid CAPP systems.
Process planning system , Machinability data systems , Benefits of CAPP
PPCE unit 2 (ME8793 – PROCESS PLANNING AND COST ESTIMATION )TAMILMECHKIT
UNIT 2 – PROCESS PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Process parameters calculation for various production processes-Selection jigs and fixtures- Selection of quality assurance methods - Set of documents for process planning-Economics of process planning- case studies
Sections:
1. Fundamentals of Manual Assembly Lines
2. Analysis of Single Model Assembly Lines
3. Line Balancing Algorithms
4. Mixed Model Assembly Lines
5. Workstation Considerations
6. Other Considerations in Assembly Line Design
7. Alternative Assembly Systems
GT Definition,Implementing Group Technology (GT),four methods GT, 1.OPTIZ PARTS CLASSIFICATION AND CODING SYSTEM,2.MICLASS coding system ,CODE MDSI System,BENEFITS OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY and limitations.
Poor layout design is determined as a major problem
in small and medium industry. These particular problems thus
affect the productivity and the line efficiency as well. In
automotive industries, assembly line is the major area to be
taken into consideration for increasing productivity. The focus
of this paper is to identify the bottleneck workstations in the
current layout and eliminate those activities that are taking time
on that workstations. The time study is done by using camera.
The current layout is redesigned by computing takt time and
processing times in each workstations. The case study shows how
the takt time calculation is done and from this takt time the
processing time is decided for all workstations. The time
consuming activities are reduced and thus the processing times
at all workstations is made possibly equal. The time reduction
increases productivity in the form of increased number of units
of production in the same previous time.
Line efficiency is also found to be improved which is described
with the terms Overall Line Efficiency (OLE) and First Pass
Yield (First Time Through) units.
The reason the FMS is called flexible is that it is capable of
processing a variety of different part styles simultaneously
at the various workstations, and the mix of part styles and
quantities of production can be adjusted in response to
changing demand patterns.
• The FMS is most suited for
the mid-variety, mid-volume
production range
A flexible manufacturing system is a
automated machine cell, consisting of
a group of processing workstations,
interconnected with automated
material handling and storage
system.
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxR&R Consult
CFD analysis is incredibly effective at solving mysteries and improving the performance of complex systems!
Here's a great example: At a large natural gas-fired power plant, where they use waste heat to generate steam and energy, they were puzzled that their boiler wasn't producing as much steam as expected.
R&R and Tetra Engineering Group Inc. were asked to solve the issue with reduced steam production.
An inspection had shown that a significant amount of hot flue gas was bypassing the boiler tubes, where the heat was supposed to be transferred.
R&R Consult conducted a CFD analysis, which revealed that 6.3% of the flue gas was bypassing the boiler tubes without transferring heat. The analysis also showed that the flue gas was instead being directed along the sides of the boiler and between the modules that were supposed to capture the heat. This was the cause of the reduced performance.
Based on our results, Tetra Engineering installed covering plates to reduce the bypass flow. This improved the boiler's performance and increased electricity production.
It is always satisfying when we can help solve complex challenges like this. Do your systems also need a check-up or optimization? Give us a call!
Work done in cooperation with James Malloy and David Moelling from Tetra Engineering.
More examples of our work https://www.r-r-consult.dk/en/cases-en/
Student information management system project report ii.pdfKamal Acharya
Our project explains about the student management. This project mainly explains the various actions related to student details. This project shows some ease in adding, editing and deleting the student details. It also provides a less time consuming process for viewing, adding, editing and deleting the marks of the students.
Explore the innovative world of trenchless pipe repair with our comprehensive guide, "The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair." This document delves into the modern methods of repairing underground pipes without the need for extensive excavation, highlighting the numerous advantages and the latest techniques used in the industry.
Learn about the cost savings, reduced environmental impact, and minimal disruption associated with trenchless technology. Discover detailed explanations of popular techniques such as pipe bursting, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining, and directional drilling. Understand how these methods can be applied to various types of infrastructure, from residential plumbing to large-scale municipal systems.
Ideal for homeowners, contractors, engineers, and anyone interested in modern plumbing solutions, this guide provides valuable insights into why trenchless pipe repair is becoming the preferred choice for pipe rehabilitation. Stay informed about the latest advancements and best practices in the field.
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
Overview of the fundamental roles in Hydropower generation and the components involved in wider Electrical Engineering.
This paper presents the design and construction of hydroelectric dams from the hydrologist’s survey of the valley before construction, all aspects and involved disciplines, fluid dynamics, structural engineering, generation and mains frequency regulation to the very transmission of power through the network in the United Kingdom.
Author: Robbie Edward Sayers
Collaborators and co editors: Charlie Sims and Connor Healey.
(C) 2024 Robbie E. Sayers
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)MdTanvirMahtab2
This presentation is about the working procedure of Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL). A Govt. owned Company of Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation under Ministry of Industries.
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdffxintegritypublishin
Advancements in technology unveil a myriad of electrical and electronic breakthroughs geared towards efficiently harnessing limited resources to meet human energy demands. The optimization of hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems plays a pivotal role in utilizing natural resources effectively. This initiative not only benefits humanity but also fosters environmental sustainability. The study investigated the design optimization of these hybrid systems, focusing on understanding solar radiation patterns, identifying geographical influences on solar radiation, formulating a mathematical model for system optimization, and determining the optimal configuration of PV panels and pumped hydro storage. Through a comparative analysis approach and eight weeks of data collection, the study addressed key research questions related to solar radiation patterns and optimal system design. The findings highlighted regions with heightened solar radiation levels, showcasing substantial potential for power generation and emphasizing the system's efficiency. Optimizing system design significantly boosted power generation, promoted renewable energy utilization, and enhanced energy storage capacity. The study underscored the benefits of optimizing hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems for sustainable energy usage. Optimizing the design of solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems as examined across diverse climatic conditions in a developing country, not only enhances power generation but also improves the integration of renewable energy sources and boosts energy storage capacities, particularly beneficial for less economically prosperous regions. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights for advancing energy research in economically viable areas. Recommendations included conducting site-specific assessments, utilizing advanced modeling tools, implementing regular maintenance protocols, and enhancing communication among system components.
1. Manual Assembly Lines
Sections:
1. Fundamentals of Manual Assembly Lines
2. Analysis of Single Model Assembly Lines
3. Line Balancing Algorithms
4. Other Considerations in Assembly Line Design
5. Alternative Assembly Systems
2. Manual Assembly Lines
§ Work systems consisting of multiple workers organized to produce a
single product or a limited range of products
§ Assembly workers perform tasks at workstations located along the
line-of-flow of the product
§ Usually a powered conveyor is used
§ Some of the workstations may be equipped with portable powered tools.
§ Factors favoring the use of assembly lines:
§ High or medium demand for product
§ Products are similar or identical
§ Total work content can be divided into work elements
§ To automate assembly tasks is impossible
3. Why Assembly Lines are Productive
§ Specialization of labor
§ When a large job is divided into small tasks and each task is
assigned to one worker, the worker becomes highly proficient at
performing the single task (Learning curve)
§ Interchangeable parts
§ Each component is manufactured to sufficiently close tolerances
that any part of a certain type can be selected at random for
assembly with its mating component.
§ Thanks to interchangeable parts, assemblies do not need fitting of
mating components
4. Some Definitions
§ Work flow
§ Each work unit should move steadily along the line
§ Line pacing
§ Workers must complete their tasks within a certain cycle time,
which will be the pace of the whole line
5. Manual Assembly Line
§ A production line that consists of a sequence of
workstations where assembly tasks are performed by
human workers
§ Products are assembled as they move along the line
§ At each station a portion of the total work content is performed on
each unit
§ Base parts are launched onto the beginning of the line at
regular intervals (cycle time)
§ Workers add components to progressively build the product
6. Manual Assembly Line
•Configuration of an n-workstation manual assembly line
•The production rate of an assembly line is determined by its slowest
station.
§Assembly workstation: A designated location along the work flow path
at which one or more work elements are performed by one or more
workers
7. Two assembly operators
working on an engine
assembly line (photo
courtesy of Ford Motor
Company)
Origin of Manual Assembly Line
8. Assembly Workstation
A designated location along the work flow path at which
one or more work elements are performed by one or more
workers
Typical operations performed at manual assembly stations
Adhesive application
Sealant application
Arc welding
Spot welding
Electrical connections
Component insertion
Press fitting
Riveting
Snap fitting
Soldering
Stitching/stapling
Threaded fasteners
9. Manning level
§ There may be more than one worker per station.
§ Utility workers: are not assigned to specific workstations.
§ They are responsible for
(1) helping workers who fall behind,
(2) relieving for workers for personal breaks,
(3) maintenance and repair
10. Manning level
§Average manning level:
where
M=average manning level of the line,
wu=number of utility workers assigned to the system, n=number of
workstations,
wi=number of workers assigned specifically to station i for i=1,…,n
n
ww
M
n
i
iu å=
+
= 1
11. Work Transport Systems-Manual Methods
§ Manual methods
§ Work units are moved between stations by the workers without
powered conveyor
§ Problems:
§ Starving of stations
§ The assembly operator has completed the assigned task on the
current work unit, but the next unit has not yet arrived at the station
§ Blocking of stations
§ The operator has completed the assigned task on the current work
unit but cannot pass the unit to the downstream station because that
worker is not yet ready to receive it.
12. Work Transport Systems-Manual Methods
§ To reduce starving,
§ use buffers
§ To prevent blocking,
§ provide space between upstream and downstream stations.
§ But both solutions can result in higher WIP,
§ which is economically undesirable.
13. Work Transport Systems-Mechanized
Methods
§ Continuously moving conveyor: operates at constant velocity
§ Work units are fixed to the conveyor
§ Worker moves alongside the line and back
§ Work units are removable from the conveyor
§ Synchronous transport (intermittent transport – stop-and-go line):
all work units are moved simultaneously between stations.
§ Problem: Incomplete units; excessive stress. Not common for
manual lines (variability).
§ Asynchronous transport : a work unit leaves a given station when
the assigned task is completed.
§ Variations in worker task times: small queues in front of each
station.
14. Coping with Product Variety
§ Single model assembly line (SMAL)
§ Every work unit is the same
§ Batch model assembly line (BMAL ) – multiple model line
§ Two or more different products
§ Products are so different that they must be made in batches with
setup between
§ Mixed model assembly line (MMAL)
§ Two or more different models
§ Differences are slight so models can be made simultaneously with
no downtime
15. Coping with Product Variety
§ Advantages of mixed models over batch order models
§ No production time is lost during changeovers
§ High inventories due to batch ordering are avoided
§ Production rates of different models can be adjusted as product demand
changes.
§ Disadvantages of mixed models over batch order models
§ Each station is equipped to perform variety of tasks (costly)
§ Scheduling and logistic activities are more difficult in this type of lines.
16. Alternative Assembly Systems:
§ A single station manual assembly cell
It consists of a single workplace in which the assembly work is accomplished
on the product or some major sub assembly of the product.
§ Assembly cells based on worker teams
It involves the use of multiple workers assigned to a common assembly task.
§ Automated assembly systems
Use automated methods at workstations rather than humans. These can be
type IA or type IIIA manufacturing systems.
17. Analysis of Single Model Lines
§The assembly line must be designed to achieve a
production rate sufficient to satisfy the demand.
§Demand rate → production rate→ cycle time
§Annual demand Da must be reduced to an hourly production
rate Rp
where
Sw = number of shifts/week
Hsh = number of hours/shift
shw
a
p
HS
D
R
50
=
18. Determining Cycle Time
Line efficiency: Uptime proportion. Accounts for lost production time due
to equipment failures, power outages, material unavailability, quality
problems, labor problems.
Production rate Rp is converted to a cycle time Tc, accounting for line
efficiency E
where 60 converts hourly production rate to cycle time in minutes, and E
= proportion uptime on the line
p
c
R
E
T
60
=
19. The cycle time Tc establishes the
ideal cycle rate for the line:
c
c
T
R
60
=
This Rc>Rp because line efficiency E is less
than 100%, Rc and Rp are related to E as
follows: c
p
R
R
E =
Number of workers on the production line
AT
WL
w =
Determining Efficiency
20. Number of Workers Required
Work load: Available Time:
The theoretical minimum number of workers (assuming
workers spend all their time on the product) on the line is
determined as:
w* = Minimum Integer ³
where
Twc = work content time, min; Tc = cycle time, min/worker
If we assume one worker per station then this gives the
minimum number of stations
c
wc
T
T
c
wc
wcp
T
TE
WL
TRWL
×
=
×=
60
EAT 60=
21. Theoretical Minimum Not Possible
§ Repositioning losses: Some time will be lost at each
station every cycle for repositioning the worker or the work
unit; thus, the workers will not have the entire Tc each
cycle
§ Line balancing problem: It is not possible to divide the
work content time evenly among workers, and some
workers will have an amount of work that is less than Tc.
§ Task time variability: Inherent and unavoidable variability
in the time required by a worker to perform a given
assembly task.
§ Quality problems: Defective components and other
quality problems cause delays and rework that add to the
work load.
22. Repositioning Losses
Repositioning losses occur on a production line because
some time is required each cycle to reposition the worker, the
work unit, or both
§ Repositioning time = Tr
Service time = time available each cycle for the worker to
work on the product
§ Service time Ts = Max{Tsi} ≤Tc – Tr
Repositioning efficiency Er =
c
rc
c
s
T
TT
T
T -
=
23. Cycle Time on an Assembly Line
Components of cycle time at several stations on a manual
assembly line
Tsi=service time, Tr=repositioning time
24. Line Balancing Problem
Given:
§ The total work content consists of many distinct work
elements
§ The sequence in which the elements can be performed is
restricted
§ The line must operate at a specified cycle time
The Problem:
§ To assign the individual work elements to workstations so
that all workers have an equal amount of work to perform
25. Line balancing problem:
§ The line balancing problem is concerned with assigning
the individual work.
§ Two important concepts in line balancing are the
separation of the total work content into minimum
rotational work elements and the precedence constraints.
§ Minimum rotational work elements: å
=
=
en
k
ekwc TT
1
Tek : Time to perform work element k
ne : Number of work elements
26. Work element times
§ Work elements are assigned to station i that add up to the
service time for that station
§ The station service times must add up to the total work
content time
åÎ
=
ik
eksi TT
å
=
=
n
k
siwc TT
1
27. Precedence Constraints
§ Precedence constraints: The variation in element times
that make it difficult to obtain equal service times for all
stations, there are restrictions on the order in which work
elements can be performed. These technological
requirements on the work sequence are called
precedence constraints.
Precedence
diagram
29. Worker requirements:
Three factors that reduce the productivity of a manual
assembly line:
§ Line efficiency (E)
§ Repositioning efficiency (Er)
§ Balancing efficiency (Eb)
§ Labor efficiency on the assembly line=
§ More realistic value for the number of workers on
assembly line is:
br EEE
sb
wc
cbr
wc
br
wcp
TE
T
TEE
T
EEE
TR
w ==³=*
60
IntegerMinimum
30. Work stations considerations:
§ If the manning level is one for all stations, then the number
of stations is equal to the number of workers.
§ Total length of the assembly line :
§ Feed rate:
§ Center to center spacing between
base parts:
M
w
n =
å
=
=
n
i
siLL
1
c
p
T
f
1
=
cc
p
c
p Tv
f
v
s ==
32. Line Balancing Objective
To distribute the total work content on the assembly line as
evenly as possible among the workers
§ Minimize (wTs – Twc)
or
§ Minimize (Ts - Tsi)
Subject to: (1) £ Ts
(2) all precedence requirements are obeyed
∑
∈ik
ekT
∑
1=
w
i
33. Line Balancing Algorithms
1. Largest candidate rule
2. Kilbridge and Wester method
3. Ranked positional weights method, also known as the
Helgeson and Birne method
In the following descriptions, assume one worker per
workstation
34. Largest Candidate Rule
List all work elements in descending order based on their Tek
values; then,
1. Start at the top of the list and selecting the first element
that satisfies precedence requirements and does not
cause the total sum of Tek to exceed the allowable Ts
value
When an element is assigned, start back at the top of the
list and repeat selection process
2. When no more elements can be assigned to the current
station, proceed to next station
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 until all elements have been
assigned to as many stations as needed
36. Solution for Largest Candidate Rule
Physical layout of workstations and assignment of elements
to stations using the largest candidate rule
37. Kilbridge and Wester Method
Arrange work elements into columns according to their
positions in the precedence diagram
§ Work elements are then organized into a list according to
their columns, starting with the elements in the first column
§ Proceed with same steps 1, 2, and 3 as in the largest
candidate rule
38. Kilbridge & Wester Method
Arrangement
of elements
into columns
for the K&W
algorithm
39. Ranked Positional Weights Method
A ranked position weight (RPW) is calculated for each
work element
§ RPW for element k is calculated by summing the Te values
for all of the elements that follow element k in the diagram
plus Tek itself
§ Work elements are then organized into a list according to
their RPW values, starting with the element that has the
highest RPW value
§ Proceed with same steps 1, 2, and 3 as in the largest
candidate rule
40. Other Considerations in Line Design
§ Methods analysis
§ To analyze methods at bottleneck or other troublesome
workstations
§ Subdividing work elements
§ Sharing work elements between two adjacent stations
§ Utility workers
§ To relieve congestion at stations that are temporarily
overloaded
§ Changing work head speeds at mechanized stations
§ Preassembly of components
§ Prepare certain subassemblies off-line to reduce work
content time on the final assembly line
41. Other Considerations - continued
§ Storage buffers between stations
§ To permit continued operation of certain sections of the
line when other sections break down
§ To smooth production between stations with large task
time variations
§ Zoning and other constraints
§ Parallel stations
§ To reduce time at bottleneck stations that have
unusually long task times
42. Alternative Assembly Systems
§ Single-station manual assembly cell
§ A single workstation in which all of the assembly work
is accomplished on the product or on some major
subassembly
§ Common for complex products produced in small
quantities, sometimes one of a kind
§ Assembly by worker teams
§ Multiple workers assigned to a common assembly task
§ Advantage: greater worker satisfaction
§ Disadvantage: slower than line production