KERATOPROSTHESIS
Presented by- Dr samarth mishra
Keratoprosthesis=artificial corneaKeratoprosthesis=artificial cornea
(kerato=cornea; prosthesis=artificial(kerato=cornea; prosthesis=artificial
substitute)substitute)
 The idea of artificial cornea was first proposed in
1789 by French ophthalmologist Guillaume Pellier
de Quengsy.
 The first reported human KPro surgery with a
quartz crystal implant was performed by Nussbaum
in 1855
 1950- Stone & Herbert – noted PMMA(poly methyl
methacrylate) splinters embedded in corneas of
pilot of World War II were well tolerated.
KERATOPROSTHESISKERATOPROSTHESIS
 Keratoprosthesis is a surgical procedure where a severely damaged
or diseased cornea is replaced with an artificial cornea.
 Keratoprotheses are made of clear plastic with excellent tissue
tolerance and optical properties. They vary in design, size and in the
implantation techniques.
 Keratoprosthesis restores sight – eye with damaged cornea by
means of a special tube that acts as a “periscope’’ from the eye to
outside world.
 Keratoprosthesis extend both inside the eye and outside into the
environment.
 It provides a tunnel vision.
 Extent of visual field increases with increase in diameter and
decreases with increasing length of the optical cylinder.
DESIGN & MATERIALSDESIGN & MATERIALS
 Keratoprosthesis –consists of an optical cylinder & a
supporting flange.
 Devices usually consist of a porous outer skirt element
joined to rigid polymethylmethacrylate lens.
 Materials used for optical cylinder-
1. PMMA(choyce & boston keratoprosthesis)
2. Dacron( pintucci keratoprosthesis)
3. Polycarbonate(champagne cork keratoprosthesis )
4. Hydroxy-apatite ( leon – barraquer Kpro)
5. Hydrogel( alpha cor keratoprosthesis) &
6. Polyurathane ( seoul keratoprosthesi)
 PMMA – most widely used material for optical
cylinder & never reported as a cause of failure.
SUPPORTING FLANGE made up of :SUPPORTING FLANGE made up of :
1. METHACRYLATE
2. TEFLON
3. DACRON MESH
4. POLYCARBONATE
5. TOOTH & BONE( OSTEO-ODONTO KPRO)
6. CARTILAGE(CHONDRO KPRO) OR
7. NAIL ( ONYCHO KPRO)
CLASSIFICATION OFCLASSIFICATION OF
KERATOPROSTHESIS DESIGNS:KERATOPROSTHESIS DESIGNS:
 NON PENETRATING ( INTRALAMELLAR )
 PENETRATING
 ANTERIOR
 POSTERIOR
 PERFORATING
 INTRALAMELLAR
 ANTERIOR
 Cardona through and through keratoprosthesis
 Ceramic keratoprosthesis
 Dohlman keratoprosthesis
 Osteo odonto keratoprosthesis
 Boston keratoprosthesis
 Champagne cork keratoprosthesis
 POSTERIOR
 Nut and Bolt keratoprosthesis
Keratoprosthesis
suitable for severe
dry eye with absent
tear function-
Osteo odonto
keratoprosthesis
Boston
keratoprosthesis
type II
Keratoprosthesis
indicated in eyes with
some residual tear
function are
classified as wet
eyes-
Champagne cork
Pintussi
Boston type I
Alpha cor
keratoprosthesis
Keratoprosthesi can be divided into temporary andKeratoprosthesi can be divided into temporary and
permanent depending on indicationpermanent depending on indication
Temporary device used intra operatively to aid in
visualization and removed following surgery.
 Indication include
 Severe ocular trauma for anterior & posterior segment
reconstruction
 Cataract extraction
 Modified triple procedure
 Vitreo retinal surgery in case of corneal opacity or ocular
trauma
 Combined PK &vitreoretinal surgery
 Ex- Eckardts keratoprosthesis, Landers Foulk & Landers
wide field lenses
Permanent keratoprosthesis- used to treat
patients with severe corneal disease where corneal
transplantation is inappropriate or has repeatedly failed.
INDICATIONS &INDICATIONS &
CONTRAINDICATIONSCONTRAINDICATIONS
Keratoprosthesis indicated in patients with bilateral corneal
blindness who have little or no chance of success with a
standard corneal graft.
Indicated in medical conditions like
Multiple graft failure
Graft failure with chronic edema
Corneal dystrophy
 Stevens-Johnson syndrome
 Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid
 Ocular burns (acid and alkali, thermal)
 and other conditions with poor prognosis with traditional PKP
Procedure of last resort
- to give at least navigational vision
- not done if BVA both eyes > or= CF
Indications:Indications:
Lacrimal choristoma
Failed corneal graft HZO/ neurotrophic keratopathy
STEVEN JOHNSONS SYNDROMES
Vascularized cornea
Central KPro in a patient with Acid burns
8yrs post-op VA 6/36
Contraindications
• Patients who are happy and managing with their level of
vision
•children under the age of 17,
• eyes that have no perception of light,
•evidence of phthisis,
•advanced glaucoma or
• irreparable retinal detachment should be excluded.
Suitable candidates have to understand that the surgery can
be prolonged—they may require multiple procedures—and
that there is a significant risk of serious complications
including loss of the eye.
The patient must be able to commit to life-long follow-up, and
not have unreasonable expectations of outcome and
cosmesis.
Preoperative assessmentPreoperative assessment
Eye undergoing keratoprosthesis surgery should
be free from initial insult of injury,physical
/chemical , active inflammation or infection.
Intraocular pressure should be adequately
controlled with no evidence of glaucomatous
damage to optic nerve head.
A good visual potential must be elicited with aid
of light projection, pupillary responses,
ultrasonography of posterior segment &
electrodiagnostic tests.
The commonly used ones are
BOSTON KPRO(TYPE 1 AND 2)
The Boston Type I Kpro is the most widely used device.
The Boston Type II Kpro may be indicated in patients
with severe ocular surface disease, poor ability to maintain
a moist ocular surface, and forniceal foreshortening with
inability to wear a contact lens
ALPHA-COR KPRO
AlphaCor Kpro is indicated in patients with failed grafts
due to corneal allograft rejection
OSTEO-ODONTO KPRO(OOKP)
OOKP like theBoston Type II Kpro, is reserved for end-
stage ocular surface
disease as a last resort
BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESISBOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS
Boston Keratoprosthesis is the innovation
and design of Professor Claes H. Dohlman
FDA approval 1992
types 1 and 2
made from poly methyl methacrylate
(PMMA).
Most commonly used type 1
2 Types
◦ Type 1:- More
commonly used.
Used in eyes that
have sufficient
wetting function to
maintain the corneal
tissue in which the
Kpro is placed.
◦ Type 2:- Used in
very dry eye with
minimal or no tear
production.
Boston Keratoprosthesis TypesBoston Keratoprosthesis Types
PartsParts
collar button design
 There is a front plate and
back plate sandwiching a
fresh donor corneal graft
Titanium locking ring is
used to secure the front And
back plates and corneal
complex to prevent Any
Inadvertent Unscrewing of
the complex.
Type 1Type 1
The typical anterior surface power of this device is 43–44
dioptres.
Aphakic eyes require a variety of powers depending on
the axial length
Type 2Type 2
The type 2 device is of a similar design,
with an added anterior cylinder that
protrudes through a permanently closed
upper eyelid, and is used in end-stage dry
eye
Back plates holes are important to allow
the nutrients to reach the graft
keratocytes from the aqueous
surgerysurgery
Superficial keratectomy of 8.5 mm of
donor cornea then a 3mm central punch
done
The donor button is then placed over
the stem of the front plate and the back
plate is slid into place on top of this
without screwing or turning.
 A titanium locking ring is then pushed
onto the remaining exposed stem until
an audible snap is heard
The recipient cornea is then trephined as
for conventional PKP (trephine diameter
0.5 mm less than donor trephine size).
The donor graft with the KPro is then
sutured in place with interrupted 10–0
nylon, using the same technique as a
standard PKP.
Surgery usually concludes with the
intracameral injection of 0.4 mg
dexamethasone
Conclusion with the application of a soft
contact lens
Post op steroid E/D ,antibiotic E/D used
Post op F/U at 1,2,4 wks,then monthly
Each visit IOP and VA noted and soft
contact lens changed
 Finally, a soft contact lens , plano power, is placed as
a bandage lens.
 All patients received lifelong prophylactic antibiotics:
moxifloxacin 0.5% , Vacomycin fortified drops
(25mg/ml) qid, Prednisolone Acetate 1% and Tears
Naturale Free .
OSTEO-ODONTO KPRO (OOKP)OSTEO-ODONTO KPRO (OOKP)
Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis
(OOKP) (also known as "tooth in eye"
procedure.
It includes removal of a tooth from the
patient or a donor. After this, a lamina of
tissue cut from the tooth is drilled and the
hole is fitted with optics. The lamina is
grown in the patients' cheek for a period
of months and then is implanted upon the
eye
MODIFIED OSTEO ODONTOMODIFIED OSTEO ODONTO
KPRO(MOOKP)KPRO(MOOKP)
The OOKP was first described by Strampelli in
1963
Later modified (MOOKP) by falcinelli and coll
It uses the patient’s own tooth root and
surrounding alveolar bone to support a centrally
cemented optical cylinder.
Multi staged procedure, sx in mouth and eye
PRINCIPLE
use of a wide single rooted tooth with surrounding
alveolar bone acts as carrier for a PMMA optical
cylinder, which is covered by buccal mucous
membrane,
Pre op assesmentPre op assesment
detailed history
Previous surgical interventions
An inaccurate projection of rays (PR) is not
a contraindication
Intraocular pressure is usually assessed by
digital tonometry
 Oral assessment includes assessment of
oral and dental hygiene and state of buccal
mucosa.
spiral CT scan of canines is carried out for
selection of a suitable tooth with the
assistance of an oromaxillofacial surgeon
MethodsMethods
In contrast to classic
OOKP, Our MOOKP
consists of 3 stages.
The first stage involves
the removal of iris and
lens, as well as the
preparation of the osteo-
dental lamina complex.
MethodsMethods
The second stage
involves the
preparation of
buccal mucosal
surface
Third stage
involves
implantation of
complex.
STAGE 1A
superficial keratectomy
fibrovascular pannus removal
intracapsular cataract extraction
anterior vitrectomy
total iridectomy
Complete removal of these structures is
done to reduce the possibility of
postoperative glaucoma and formation of
retroprosthetic membranes.
STAGE 1B
done usually 6 weeks after stage IA
full thickness mucous membrane graft (MMG) harvested from
the buccal mucosa.
The extent of MMG should be extend from upper to lower
fornix and measures around 3-4 cm in diameter.
MMG is sutured over damaged cornea at insertion of 4 recti
muscles and sclera In four quadrnts with 6.0 vicryl
It has stem cells,high proliferating Capacity and adapted to high
Bacterial load
STAGE 1C
Involves preparation of the osteo dental acrylic Lamina
(ODAL)
A single rooted tooth, preferably the upper canine is chosen
for preparation of the lamina.
The tooth with the surrounding alveolar bone is extracted.
Then sliced sagitally and Central hole is drilled
customized PMMA optical cylinder is cemented with acrylic
resin
ODAL is then placed in the subcutaneous pouch in the orbito
zygomatic area for next 3 months to develop vascularization
and to promote the growth of connective tissue.
STAGE 2
This is performed 3 months after stage IB+IC
ODAL is dissected off from the subcutaneous pouch and
examined for its integrity prior to proceeding with ocular surgery
The central cornea is trephined according to the posterior
diameter of the cylinder.
ODAL is placed with the cylinder centered over the corneal
trephination and sutured.
The MMG is finally reflected back on the lamina with a central
trephination through which the anterior cylinder protrudes out
POST OP MANAGEMENT
•Perioperatively, systemic and topical
antibiotics are administered.
•Systemic steroids and antiglaucoma
medication are also prescribed
Visual acuity, refraction, digital tonometry,
fundus, optic nerve status and visual fields
should be checked at each follow up.
The health of the mucous
membrane,protrusion and stability of the
optic cylinder should be looked for.
ALPHA COR KPROALPHA COR KPRO
The AlphaCor developed from the Chirila Kpro at
the Lions Eye Institute in Western Australia, first
implanted in human eyes in 1998 and receiving FDA
approval in 2003.
Manufactured from a single biocompatible polymer,
poly hydroxyethyl methacrylate (pHEMA)
two zones, a clear central optical core and an
opaque spongy skirt, made by polymerizing
the pHEMA under conditions of differing water
content
Interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) –
junction between the skirt and central optic
and is a permanent bond
Refractive Power close to that of human cornea .
ALPHA-COR KERATOPROSTHESISALPHA-COR KERATOPROSTHESIS
FDA-approved type of synthetic cornea
measuring 7.0 mm in diameter and
0.5 mm in thickness.
main advantages of synthetic corneas are
that they are biocompatible, and the
network between the parts and the device
prevents complications that could arise at
their interface.
PRINCIPLE
The ability of the outer skirt to be colonized by
invading keratocytes resulting in integration of
the device with surrounding tissues
INDICATIONS
Patients should have adequate tear production
as assessed by the unstimulated Schirmer test
with a value of at least 50% of normal
VA from <6/60 to light perception
previous failed grafts with a poor chance with
further PKP
Functioning retina
absence of evidence of advanced
glaucomatous optic neuropathy or well-
controlled glaucoma on treatment.
Surgical procedure-- 2 stageSurgical procedure-- 2 stage
procedureprocedure
STAGE 1
•360° conjunctival peritomy
debridement of the corneal epithelium
superior half of the cornea is dissected into two
layers, superficial and deep, each of about 50%
thickness, through a superior paralimbal 180°
incision
extended to form a pocket in the inferior cornea
superficial corneal flap is then reflected inferiorly to
expose the deep cornea, to allow trephination of the
central posterior lamella with a 3.5 mm disposable
trephine to enter the anterior chamber
The AlphaCor is placed between the two layers
within the pocket, centred over the posterior
lamellar opening
The superficial flap is then replaced and sutured at
the limbus with interrupted 10/0 nylon.
STAGE 2
•2 months after Stage I
•tissues superficial to the AlphaCor optic (anterior corneal
lamella) are removed to expose the optical zone.
 Following trephination and removal of the host
cornea, manual extracapsular cataract extraction
is performed via an open-sky technique with
placement of a plano intraocular lens.
COMBINED KERATOPROSTHESIS PLACEMENT,
CATARACT EXTRACTION, AND IOL IMPLANTATION
The pre-assembled keratoprosthesis is
sutured into position with interrupted bites
using 9.0 nylon suture.
SINGH-WORST KPROSINGH-WORST KPRO
 Designed and developed in collaboration
with Dr. Jan Worst in Netherlands and Dr.
Daljit Singh in India.
 Champagne-Cork Design for better stability.
 one piece polycarbonate device
 anterior surface has a diameter of 6.0mm
 Shaft end diameter 4.5mm. Neck diameter
3.0 mm.
 The flange has 8 equidistant holes near the
margin.
 Anticonical shape –creates a valve on the
cornea
 Steel suture fixation on equatorial sclera
preventing extrusion.
Stanford Keratoprosthesis :-
◦ Kpro is based on a mechanically enhanced
Hydrogel called Duoptix
◦ It supports the growth of epithelial cells.
◦ Surrounding the optic is a microperforated rim
designed to promote peripheral tissue
integration
Collagen Based Keratoprosthesis
◦ Designed to mimic the extra cellular Matrix of
corneal stroma
Modified Keratoprosthesis Biomaterials
with bio active factors
Recent AdvancesRecent Advances
COMPLICATIONSCOMPLICATIONS
MELTS AND EXTRUSION
INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS
GLAUCOMA
RETRO PROSTHETIC MEMBRANES
RETINAL DETACHMENT
OTHERS
MELTS AND EXTRUSIONMELTS AND EXTRUSION
Melts tends to occur at the base of Boston
kpro
USG and anterior segment OCT are helpful in
detection and f/u of corneal thinning around
kpro
Any leak on siedels test, USG to be done to
see choroidal effusion
If melts are seen then replace the whole thing
with fresh graft and put new kpro’
In MOOKP, resorption of buccal mucosa can
occur,new graft can be placed
Resoprtion of osteo odonto lamina can
occur,serial CT scan yearly
If much resorption of dentine has occurred
entire thing should be replaced
INFECTIOUSINFECTIOUS
ENDOPHTHALMITISENDOPHTHALMITIS
Dreadful complication
following kpro sx
Often evidence of leak
seen
Rx includes leak
repair,i/vit tap,injection
of antibiotics and topical
antibiotics
Fungal infection
suspected change
contact lens and give
topical amphotericin and
systemic anti fungals
required
GLAUCOMAGLAUCOMA
Single most serious complication following
sx leading to irreversible loss of vn
D/T chronic low grade
inflamman,progessive angle
closure,anterior displacement of iris have
been implicated
Topical rx is effective in pts with boston
type 1 kpro
systemic rx can be used with boston type
2 and MOOKP
Tube shunts and endoscopic
cyclophotocoagulation have been
succesfully used with all types of kpros
RETRO PROSTHETIC MEMBRANESRETRO PROSTHETIC MEMBRANES
 Most commonly reported
 Occurs in 25-64% of pts in 1 yr follow up
 These fibrous membranes originate from activated host
stromal cornea cells that migrate through gaps in the
posterior graft–host junction
 RPM formation seems to be more prevalent in individual
with chronic inflammation such as autoimmune diseases
and uveitis
 Development of titanic back plates have reduced incidence
Treatment
Nd yag capsultomy following by steroids in 90% cases
If membrane thick,leathery and vascularised,sx
management
For boston kpro vit+membranectomy can be performed
However removal of prosthesis and repacement with new
one is preferred
RETINAL DETACHMENTRETINAL DETACHMENT
Most common posterior segment complication
with an incidence of 16.9 %
Surgical rx with buckle or vitrectomy is
performed
achievement of anatomic success is limited by
the presence of chronic retinal scarring or
proliferative vitreo retinopathy (PVR) and visual
outcomes tend to be worse in these cases
Choroidal detachments can also develop in eyes
with KPro, in as many as 17 % of patients
MOOKP
Thank youThank you

Keratprosthesis

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Keratoprosthesis=artificial corneaKeratoprosthesis=artificial cornea (kerato=cornea;prosthesis=artificial(kerato=cornea; prosthesis=artificial substitute)substitute)  The idea of artificial cornea was first proposed in 1789 by French ophthalmologist Guillaume Pellier de Quengsy.  The first reported human KPro surgery with a quartz crystal implant was performed by Nussbaum in 1855  1950- Stone & Herbert – noted PMMA(poly methyl methacrylate) splinters embedded in corneas of pilot of World War II were well tolerated.
  • 3.
    KERATOPROSTHESISKERATOPROSTHESIS  Keratoprosthesis isa surgical procedure where a severely damaged or diseased cornea is replaced with an artificial cornea.  Keratoprotheses are made of clear plastic with excellent tissue tolerance and optical properties. They vary in design, size and in the implantation techniques.  Keratoprosthesis restores sight – eye with damaged cornea by means of a special tube that acts as a “periscope’’ from the eye to outside world.  Keratoprosthesis extend both inside the eye and outside into the environment.  It provides a tunnel vision.  Extent of visual field increases with increase in diameter and decreases with increasing length of the optical cylinder.
  • 4.
    DESIGN & MATERIALSDESIGN& MATERIALS  Keratoprosthesis –consists of an optical cylinder & a supporting flange.  Devices usually consist of a porous outer skirt element joined to rigid polymethylmethacrylate lens.  Materials used for optical cylinder- 1. PMMA(choyce & boston keratoprosthesis) 2. Dacron( pintucci keratoprosthesis) 3. Polycarbonate(champagne cork keratoprosthesis ) 4. Hydroxy-apatite ( leon – barraquer Kpro) 5. Hydrogel( alpha cor keratoprosthesis) & 6. Polyurathane ( seoul keratoprosthesi)  PMMA – most widely used material for optical cylinder & never reported as a cause of failure.
  • 5.
    SUPPORTING FLANGE madeup of :SUPPORTING FLANGE made up of : 1. METHACRYLATE 2. TEFLON 3. DACRON MESH 4. POLYCARBONATE 5. TOOTH & BONE( OSTEO-ODONTO KPRO) 6. CARTILAGE(CHONDRO KPRO) OR 7. NAIL ( ONYCHO KPRO)
  • 6.
    CLASSIFICATION OFCLASSIFICATION OF KERATOPROSTHESISDESIGNS:KERATOPROSTHESIS DESIGNS:  NON PENETRATING ( INTRALAMELLAR )  PENETRATING  ANTERIOR  POSTERIOR  PERFORATING  INTRALAMELLAR  ANTERIOR  Cardona through and through keratoprosthesis  Ceramic keratoprosthesis  Dohlman keratoprosthesis  Osteo odonto keratoprosthesis  Boston keratoprosthesis  Champagne cork keratoprosthesis  POSTERIOR  Nut and Bolt keratoprosthesis
  • 8.
    Keratoprosthesis suitable for severe dryeye with absent tear function- Osteo odonto keratoprosthesis Boston keratoprosthesis type II Keratoprosthesis indicated in eyes with some residual tear function are classified as wet eyes- Champagne cork Pintussi Boston type I Alpha cor keratoprosthesis
  • 10.
    Keratoprosthesi can bedivided into temporary andKeratoprosthesi can be divided into temporary and permanent depending on indicationpermanent depending on indication Temporary device used intra operatively to aid in visualization and removed following surgery.  Indication include  Severe ocular trauma for anterior & posterior segment reconstruction  Cataract extraction  Modified triple procedure  Vitreo retinal surgery in case of corneal opacity or ocular trauma  Combined PK &vitreoretinal surgery  Ex- Eckardts keratoprosthesis, Landers Foulk & Landers wide field lenses Permanent keratoprosthesis- used to treat patients with severe corneal disease where corneal transplantation is inappropriate or has repeatedly failed.
  • 11.
    INDICATIONS &INDICATIONS & CONTRAINDICATIONSCONTRAINDICATIONS Keratoprosthesisindicated in patients with bilateral corneal blindness who have little or no chance of success with a standard corneal graft. Indicated in medical conditions like Multiple graft failure Graft failure with chronic edema Corneal dystrophy  Stevens-Johnson syndrome  Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid  Ocular burns (acid and alkali, thermal)  and other conditions with poor prognosis with traditional PKP Procedure of last resort - to give at least navigational vision - not done if BVA both eyes > or= CF
  • 12.
  • 13.
    STEVEN JOHNSONS SYNDROMES Vascularizedcornea Central KPro in a patient with Acid burns 8yrs post-op VA 6/36
  • 14.
    Contraindications • Patients whoare happy and managing with their level of vision •children under the age of 17, • eyes that have no perception of light, •evidence of phthisis, •advanced glaucoma or • irreparable retinal detachment should be excluded. Suitable candidates have to understand that the surgery can be prolonged—they may require multiple procedures—and that there is a significant risk of serious complications including loss of the eye. The patient must be able to commit to life-long follow-up, and not have unreasonable expectations of outcome and cosmesis.
  • 15.
    Preoperative assessmentPreoperative assessment Eyeundergoing keratoprosthesis surgery should be free from initial insult of injury,physical /chemical , active inflammation or infection. Intraocular pressure should be adequately controlled with no evidence of glaucomatous damage to optic nerve head. A good visual potential must be elicited with aid of light projection, pupillary responses, ultrasonography of posterior segment & electrodiagnostic tests.
  • 16.
    The commonly usedones are BOSTON KPRO(TYPE 1 AND 2) The Boston Type I Kpro is the most widely used device. The Boston Type II Kpro may be indicated in patients with severe ocular surface disease, poor ability to maintain a moist ocular surface, and forniceal foreshortening with inability to wear a contact lens ALPHA-COR KPRO AlphaCor Kpro is indicated in patients with failed grafts due to corneal allograft rejection OSTEO-ODONTO KPRO(OOKP) OOKP like theBoston Type II Kpro, is reserved for end- stage ocular surface disease as a last resort
  • 17.
    BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESISBOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS BostonKeratoprosthesis is the innovation and design of Professor Claes H. Dohlman FDA approval 1992 types 1 and 2 made from poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA). Most commonly used type 1
  • 18.
    2 Types ◦ Type1:- More commonly used. Used in eyes that have sufficient wetting function to maintain the corneal tissue in which the Kpro is placed. ◦ Type 2:- Used in very dry eye with minimal or no tear production. Boston Keratoprosthesis TypesBoston Keratoprosthesis Types
  • 19.
    PartsParts collar button design There is a front plate and back plate sandwiching a fresh donor corneal graft Titanium locking ring is used to secure the front And back plates and corneal complex to prevent Any Inadvertent Unscrewing of the complex.
  • 20.
    Type 1Type 1 Thetypical anterior surface power of this device is 43–44 dioptres. Aphakic eyes require a variety of powers depending on the axial length
  • 21.
    Type 2Type 2 Thetype 2 device is of a similar design, with an added anterior cylinder that protrudes through a permanently closed upper eyelid, and is used in end-stage dry eye Back plates holes are important to allow the nutrients to reach the graft keratocytes from the aqueous
  • 22.
    surgerysurgery Superficial keratectomy of8.5 mm of donor cornea then a 3mm central punch done The donor button is then placed over the stem of the front plate and the back plate is slid into place on top of this without screwing or turning.  A titanium locking ring is then pushed onto the remaining exposed stem until an audible snap is heard
  • 23.
    The recipient corneais then trephined as for conventional PKP (trephine diameter 0.5 mm less than donor trephine size). The donor graft with the KPro is then sutured in place with interrupted 10–0 nylon, using the same technique as a standard PKP. Surgery usually concludes with the intracameral injection of 0.4 mg dexamethasone Conclusion with the application of a soft contact lens Post op steroid E/D ,antibiotic E/D used Post op F/U at 1,2,4 wks,then monthly Each visit IOP and VA noted and soft contact lens changed
  • 25.
     Finally, asoft contact lens , plano power, is placed as a bandage lens.  All patients received lifelong prophylactic antibiotics: moxifloxacin 0.5% , Vacomycin fortified drops (25mg/ml) qid, Prednisolone Acetate 1% and Tears Naturale Free .
  • 27.
    OSTEO-ODONTO KPRO (OOKP)OSTEO-ODONTOKPRO (OOKP) Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP) (also known as "tooth in eye" procedure. It includes removal of a tooth from the patient or a donor. After this, a lamina of tissue cut from the tooth is drilled and the hole is fitted with optics. The lamina is grown in the patients' cheek for a period of months and then is implanted upon the eye
  • 28.
    MODIFIED OSTEO ODONTOMODIFIEDOSTEO ODONTO KPRO(MOOKP)KPRO(MOOKP) The OOKP was first described by Strampelli in 1963 Later modified (MOOKP) by falcinelli and coll It uses the patient’s own tooth root and surrounding alveolar bone to support a centrally cemented optical cylinder. Multi staged procedure, sx in mouth and eye PRINCIPLE use of a wide single rooted tooth with surrounding alveolar bone acts as carrier for a PMMA optical cylinder, which is covered by buccal mucous membrane,
  • 31.
    Pre op assesmentPreop assesment detailed history Previous surgical interventions An inaccurate projection of rays (PR) is not a contraindication Intraocular pressure is usually assessed by digital tonometry  Oral assessment includes assessment of oral and dental hygiene and state of buccal mucosa. spiral CT scan of canines is carried out for selection of a suitable tooth with the assistance of an oromaxillofacial surgeon
  • 32.
    MethodsMethods In contrast toclassic OOKP, Our MOOKP consists of 3 stages. The first stage involves the removal of iris and lens, as well as the preparation of the osteo- dental lamina complex.
  • 33.
    MethodsMethods The second stage involvesthe preparation of buccal mucosal surface Third stage involves implantation of complex.
  • 34.
    STAGE 1A superficial keratectomy fibrovascularpannus removal intracapsular cataract extraction anterior vitrectomy total iridectomy Complete removal of these structures is done to reduce the possibility of postoperative glaucoma and formation of retroprosthetic membranes.
  • 35.
    STAGE 1B done usually6 weeks after stage IA full thickness mucous membrane graft (MMG) harvested from the buccal mucosa. The extent of MMG should be extend from upper to lower fornix and measures around 3-4 cm in diameter. MMG is sutured over damaged cornea at insertion of 4 recti muscles and sclera In four quadrnts with 6.0 vicryl It has stem cells,high proliferating Capacity and adapted to high Bacterial load
  • 36.
    STAGE 1C Involves preparationof the osteo dental acrylic Lamina (ODAL) A single rooted tooth, preferably the upper canine is chosen for preparation of the lamina. The tooth with the surrounding alveolar bone is extracted. Then sliced sagitally and Central hole is drilled customized PMMA optical cylinder is cemented with acrylic resin ODAL is then placed in the subcutaneous pouch in the orbito zygomatic area for next 3 months to develop vascularization and to promote the growth of connective tissue.
  • 37.
    STAGE 2 This isperformed 3 months after stage IB+IC ODAL is dissected off from the subcutaneous pouch and examined for its integrity prior to proceeding with ocular surgery The central cornea is trephined according to the posterior diameter of the cylinder. ODAL is placed with the cylinder centered over the corneal trephination and sutured. The MMG is finally reflected back on the lamina with a central trephination through which the anterior cylinder protrudes out
  • 38.
    POST OP MANAGEMENT •Perioperatively,systemic and topical antibiotics are administered. •Systemic steroids and antiglaucoma medication are also prescribed Visual acuity, refraction, digital tonometry, fundus, optic nerve status and visual fields should be checked at each follow up. The health of the mucous membrane,protrusion and stability of the optic cylinder should be looked for.
  • 39.
    ALPHA COR KPROALPHACOR KPRO The AlphaCor developed from the Chirila Kpro at the Lions Eye Institute in Western Australia, first implanted in human eyes in 1998 and receiving FDA approval in 2003. Manufactured from a single biocompatible polymer, poly hydroxyethyl methacrylate (pHEMA) two zones, a clear central optical core and an opaque spongy skirt, made by polymerizing the pHEMA under conditions of differing water content Interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) – junction between the skirt and central optic and is a permanent bond Refractive Power close to that of human cornea .
  • 40.
    ALPHA-COR KERATOPROSTHESISALPHA-COR KERATOPROSTHESIS FDA-approvedtype of synthetic cornea measuring 7.0 mm in diameter and 0.5 mm in thickness. main advantages of synthetic corneas are that they are biocompatible, and the network between the parts and the device prevents complications that could arise at their interface.
  • 42.
    PRINCIPLE The ability ofthe outer skirt to be colonized by invading keratocytes resulting in integration of the device with surrounding tissues INDICATIONS Patients should have adequate tear production as assessed by the unstimulated Schirmer test with a value of at least 50% of normal VA from <6/60 to light perception previous failed grafts with a poor chance with further PKP Functioning retina absence of evidence of advanced glaucomatous optic neuropathy or well- controlled glaucoma on treatment.
  • 43.
    Surgical procedure-- 2stageSurgical procedure-- 2 stage procedureprocedure STAGE 1 •360° conjunctival peritomy debridement of the corneal epithelium superior half of the cornea is dissected into two layers, superficial and deep, each of about 50% thickness, through a superior paralimbal 180° incision extended to form a pocket in the inferior cornea superficial corneal flap is then reflected inferiorly to expose the deep cornea, to allow trephination of the central posterior lamella with a 3.5 mm disposable trephine to enter the anterior chamber The AlphaCor is placed between the two layers within the pocket, centred over the posterior lamellar opening The superficial flap is then replaced and sutured at the limbus with interrupted 10/0 nylon.
  • 44.
    STAGE 2 •2 monthsafter Stage I •tissues superficial to the AlphaCor optic (anterior corneal lamella) are removed to expose the optical zone.
  • 45.
     Following trephinationand removal of the host cornea, manual extracapsular cataract extraction is performed via an open-sky technique with placement of a plano intraocular lens. COMBINED KERATOPROSTHESIS PLACEMENT, CATARACT EXTRACTION, AND IOL IMPLANTATION
  • 46.
    The pre-assembled keratoprosthesisis sutured into position with interrupted bites using 9.0 nylon suture.
  • 47.
    SINGH-WORST KPROSINGH-WORST KPRO Designed and developed in collaboration with Dr. Jan Worst in Netherlands and Dr. Daljit Singh in India.  Champagne-Cork Design for better stability.  one piece polycarbonate device  anterior surface has a diameter of 6.0mm  Shaft end diameter 4.5mm. Neck diameter 3.0 mm.  The flange has 8 equidistant holes near the margin.  Anticonical shape –creates a valve on the cornea  Steel suture fixation on equatorial sclera preventing extrusion.
  • 48.
    Stanford Keratoprosthesis :- ◦Kpro is based on a mechanically enhanced Hydrogel called Duoptix ◦ It supports the growth of epithelial cells. ◦ Surrounding the optic is a microperforated rim designed to promote peripheral tissue integration Collagen Based Keratoprosthesis ◦ Designed to mimic the extra cellular Matrix of corneal stroma Modified Keratoprosthesis Biomaterials with bio active factors Recent AdvancesRecent Advances
  • 49.
    COMPLICATIONSCOMPLICATIONS MELTS AND EXTRUSION INFECTIOUSENDOPHTHALMITIS GLAUCOMA RETRO PROSTHETIC MEMBRANES RETINAL DETACHMENT OTHERS
  • 50.
    MELTS AND EXTRUSIONMELTSAND EXTRUSION Melts tends to occur at the base of Boston kpro USG and anterior segment OCT are helpful in detection and f/u of corneal thinning around kpro Any leak on siedels test, USG to be done to see choroidal effusion If melts are seen then replace the whole thing with fresh graft and put new kpro’ In MOOKP, resorption of buccal mucosa can occur,new graft can be placed Resoprtion of osteo odonto lamina can occur,serial CT scan yearly If much resorption of dentine has occurred entire thing should be replaced
  • 52.
    INFECTIOUSINFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITISENDOPHTHALMITIS Dreadful complication following kprosx Often evidence of leak seen Rx includes leak repair,i/vit tap,injection of antibiotics and topical antibiotics Fungal infection suspected change contact lens and give topical amphotericin and systemic anti fungals required
  • 53.
    GLAUCOMAGLAUCOMA Single most seriouscomplication following sx leading to irreversible loss of vn D/T chronic low grade inflamman,progessive angle closure,anterior displacement of iris have been implicated Topical rx is effective in pts with boston type 1 kpro systemic rx can be used with boston type 2 and MOOKP Tube shunts and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation have been succesfully used with all types of kpros
  • 55.
    RETRO PROSTHETIC MEMBRANESRETROPROSTHETIC MEMBRANES  Most commonly reported  Occurs in 25-64% of pts in 1 yr follow up  These fibrous membranes originate from activated host stromal cornea cells that migrate through gaps in the posterior graft–host junction  RPM formation seems to be more prevalent in individual with chronic inflammation such as autoimmune diseases and uveitis  Development of titanic back plates have reduced incidence
  • 56.
    Treatment Nd yag capsultomyfollowing by steroids in 90% cases If membrane thick,leathery and vascularised,sx management For boston kpro vit+membranectomy can be performed However removal of prosthesis and repacement with new one is preferred
  • 57.
    RETINAL DETACHMENTRETINAL DETACHMENT Mostcommon posterior segment complication with an incidence of 16.9 % Surgical rx with buckle or vitrectomy is performed achievement of anatomic success is limited by the presence of chronic retinal scarring or proliferative vitreo retinopathy (PVR) and visual outcomes tend to be worse in these cases Choroidal detachments can also develop in eyes with KPro, in as many as 17 % of patients
  • 58.
  • 59.