3. Goals of the project
• Filling income gap in MC budgets
• Increasing financial sustainability of
organisation
• Ensuring alignment of MoS of MC and
LCs
4. Milestones of the project
• Presenting project to @PLAD – Done
• Creation of WG
• WG together creates draft of FM
• Testing FM
• Chosing the right FM for Poland
• Voting FM by National Plenary
• Implementation of FM
• AAR of the project
5. Overall Factors
(positive or negative factors that influenced the
performance)
Negative
• Different understanding of project
among MC team
Positive
• Good response for the project from
National Plenary
6. Financial Model in July 2013
Key Achievements:
• Presenting project to
LCPs and LCVPF
Key Non-Achievements
• WG application is not
created
7. Financial Model in August
Key strategies for next
month:
• Creating WG
• Adjusting the timeline
for the project after
Finance Area re-
planning
Key challenges for next
month:
• Selection of WG
members
9. Goals of the project
Optimizing timeline of organizational
general processes towards external,
internal & network realities to boost ELD
long term performance while
maintaining members’ high quality
AIESEC experience.
10. Milestones of the project
• Presentation of the idea during SumCo and gaining trust of
AIESEC in Poland towards possible change
• Data collection and preperations
• ST work
– program results analysis
– current timeline evaluation
– defining and analysis of strategic variables towards ideal
timeline creation
– timeline simulation including various perspective (eg. MM,
MC, EP)
– defining opportunitties and threats
– defining solutions towards threats
– contrasting current state with proposal – outcome analysis
– decision making
11. Milestones of the project
• Gathering BOA feedback
• Compendium correction preperation – I + II
• Voting for the change on General Assembly - I
• Presentation of the proposal to the LCPs with
gathering topics to work on
• Voting for the change on General Assembly - II
• Providing education towards change management
• Implementation monitoring
I – term shift 13.14
II – term shift 14..15
12. Overall Factors
• Timeline of the process – P
• Capitalization on the touchpoints with AIESEC
Poland - P
• Preperation of the project manager - P
• Engagement and competencies of Steering Team
members – P
• Diversification of LCs’ perspective in creation
process – N
P – positive influence
N – negative influence
13. Term Shift Mgmt in July 2013
Key Achievements:
• Presentation of the
idea during SumCo and
gaining trust of AIESEC
in Poland towards
possible change
• Data collection and
running preperations
towards culmination
point – ST
• ST work and its
outcome
Key Non-Achievements
• Lack of project’s
timeline introduction to
team box ;]
14. Term Shift Mgmt in August
Key strategies for next
month:
• ST work outcome sum
up = preperations for
GA
Key challenges for next
month:
• LCPs positive feedback
and decision making
during GA
16. Goals of the project
Designing & providing strategic organizational
initiatives connecting MC and LC in a way to:
• enable LCs’ short-term growth
• enable LCs’ capitalization on own potential
• address diversity of LC realities
• maximize on the limited limeline & resources
17. Piliars of the project
Coaching
Na+onal
Conference
Cycle
LC
Planning
18. Milestones of the
Coaching sub-project
• Current state analysis
• Desired state envisioning
• Coaching strategy creation
• Feedback gathering & correction
• Coaching application releasment
• LC Coaches allocation
• LC Coaches announcement
• Creation of coaching tools
• Coaches education
• Coaches and coaching timeline management
• Coaching round feedback gathering & evaluation
• Coaching strategy improvement
19. Overall Factors
• Timeline of the process – N
• Preperation of the project manager - P
• Capitalization on the touchpoints with AIESEC
Poland - P
• Engagement of people involved in the project - N
P – positive influence
N – negative influence
20. Coaching sub-project in July 2013
Key Achievements:
• Current state analysis
• Desired state
envisioning
• Coaching strategy
creation
• Coaching application
releasment
• LC Coaches allocation
Key Non-Achievements
• Building understanding
of coaching strategy –
need of second rund of
applications
21. „MC-LC Cooperation” in August
Key strategies for next
month:
• Coaching visits
Key challenges for next
month:
• Coaching providers on
IC, coaching to be
rescheduled
22. Milestones of the National
Conference Cycle sub-project
• Current state analysis
• Desired state envisioning
• National Conference Cycle creation
• Feedback gathering & correction
• Conference Cycle I + application releasment
• SumCo preperations & delivery
management
• SumCo evaluation
• Organizing LCs allocation
23. Milestones of the National
Conference Cycle sub-project
• Summits preperations & delivery management
• Conference Cycle II + application releasment
• Summits preperations & delivery management
• Summits evaluation
• Winco preperations & delivery management
• Winco evaluation
• MultiTo preperations & delivery management
• Multito evaluation
• Further platforms preperations & delivery
management
• Further platforms evaluation
24. Overall Factors
• Timeline of the process – N
• Preperation of the project manager - P
• Engagement of people involved in the project – P
• Capitalization on the touchpoints with AIESEC
Poland - P
P – positive influence
N – negative influence
25. National Conference Cycle
in July 2013
Key Achievements:
• Current state analysis
• Desired state
envisioning
• National conference
cycle creation &
releasment
• SumCo delivery &
management
Key Non-Achievements
• Building understanding
of AIESEC in Poland
towards change
• SumCo evaluation
• Low no of applicants
towards Conference
Organization = 2nd
round
26. National Conference Cycle
in August
Key strategies for next
month:
• Second round of
application towards
conference
organization
• Organizing LCs
allocation
• Ensuring Summits
preperations
Key challenges for next
month:
• Out of office - IC
• Higher priorities in this
limited time
27. Milestones of the LC Planning
sub-project
• Planning 2013 evaluation [MCVP OD, BOA, ST]
• Desired state envisioning
• Planning process creation
• Feedback gathering & correction
• Planning process elements delegating
• Providing feedback & correction
• Planning process consolidation
• Planning process educating [NMP]
• Planning process implementation monitoring
• LC plans gathering
• Feedback towards LC plans by MC team
• LC plans correction
• Final consolidation of LC plans
28. Overall Factors
• Timeline of the process – N
• Preperation of the project manager – N
• External perspective – P + N
• Engagement of people involved in the project – P
• Capitalization on the touchpoints with AIESEC
Poland - P
P – positive influence
N – negative influence
29. LC Planning in July 2013
Key Achievements:
• Planning 2013
evaluation
– MCVP OD
– BOA
– ST
Key Non-Achievements
• Desired state
envisioning*
• Planning process
elements delegating
30. Key strategies for next
month:
• Desired state
envisioning
• Planning process
creation
• Feedback gathering &
correction
• Planning process
elements delegating
Key challenges for next
month:
• Out of office - IC
• Higher priorities in this
limited time
LC Planning in August
