PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF OSPF AND RIP ON IPV4 & IPV6 TECHNOLOGY USING G.711 ...IJCNCJournal
Migration from IPv4 to IPv6 is still visibly slow, mainly because of the inherent cost involved in the implementation, hardware and software acquisition. However, there are many values IPv6 can bring to the
IP enabled environment as compared to IPv4, particularly for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) solutions. Many companies are drifting away from circuit based switching such as PSTN to packet based switching (VoIP) for collaboration. There are several factors determining the effective utilization and
quality of VoIP solutions. These include the choice of codec, echo control, packet loss, delay, delay variation (jitter), and the network topology. The network is basically the environment in which VoIP is deployed. State of art network design for VoIP technologies requires impeccable Interior Gateway routing
protocols that will reduce the convergence time of the network, in the event of a link failure. Choice of CODEC is also a main factor. Since most research work in this area did not consider a particular CODEC as a factor in determining performance, this paper will compare the behaviour of RIP and OSPF in IPv4
and IPv6 using G.711 CODEC with riverbed modeller17.5.
On the migration of a large scale network from i pv4 to ipv6 environmentIJCNCJournal
This work mainly addresses the design a large scale network using dual stack mechanisms. We focused on
the most important theoretical concepts of the IPv6 protocol, such as addressing, address allocation,
routing with the OSPF and BGP protocols and routing protocols performance in dual stack network using
GNS3 and Wireshark simulators. we have a tendency to measure a perfect model and a true large-scale
network atmosphere victimization out there end-to-end activity techniques that focuses on a large-scale
IPv4 and IPv6 backbone and created performance the IPv4 and IPv6 network. In this paper, we compiled
IPv6 address planning in large scale network, performance statistics of each network in terms of TCP
throughput, delay jitters, packet loss rate, and round trip time. It is found that, a minor degradation within
the throughput of the TCP, delay jitter, a lower packet loss rate, and a rather longer round trip time are
occurred in a real large scale dual stack network
TRUST BASED ROUTING METRIC FOR RPL ROUTING PROTOCOL IN THE INTERNET OF THINGSpijans
While smart factories are becoming widely recognized as a fundamental concept of Industry 4.0, their implementation has posed several challenges insofar that they generate and process vast amounts of security critical and privacy sensitive data, in addition to the fact that they deploy IoT heterogeneous and constrained devices communicating with each other and being accessed ubiquitously through lossy networks. In this scenario, the routing of data is a specific area of concern especially with the inherent constraints and limiting properties of such devices like processing resources, memory capacity and battery life. To suit these constraints and to provide the required connectivity, the IETF has developed several standards, among them the RPL routing protocol for Low powerand Lossy Networks (LLNs). However, and even though RPL provides support for integrity and confidentiality of messages, its security may be compromised by several threats and attacks. We propose in this work TRM-RPL, a Trust based Routing Metric for the RPL protocol in an IIoT based environments. TRM-RPL uses a trust management mechanism to detect malicious behaviors and resist routing attacks while providing QoS guarantees. In addition, our model addresses both node and link trust and follows a multidimensional approach to enable
an accurate trust assessment for IoT entities. TRM-RPL is implemented, successfully tested and compared with the standard RPL protocol where its effectiveniness and resilience to attacks has been proved to be better.
Migration of corperate networks from ipv4 to ipv6 using dual stackpraveenReddy268
Migration of corperate networks from ipv4 to ipv6 using dual stack
in this you will be learning about internet protocols of version4 & 6.And also about OSI layers and their architecture and coding to the routers
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF OSPF AND RIP ON IPV4 & IPV6 TECHNOLOGY USING G.711 ...IJCNCJournal
Migration from IPv4 to IPv6 is still visibly slow, mainly because of the inherent cost involved in the implementation, hardware and software acquisition. However, there are many values IPv6 can bring to the
IP enabled environment as compared to IPv4, particularly for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) solutions. Many companies are drifting away from circuit based switching such as PSTN to packet based switching (VoIP) for collaboration. There are several factors determining the effective utilization and
quality of VoIP solutions. These include the choice of codec, echo control, packet loss, delay, delay variation (jitter), and the network topology. The network is basically the environment in which VoIP is deployed. State of art network design for VoIP technologies requires impeccable Interior Gateway routing
protocols that will reduce the convergence time of the network, in the event of a link failure. Choice of CODEC is also a main factor. Since most research work in this area did not consider a particular CODEC as a factor in determining performance, this paper will compare the behaviour of RIP and OSPF in IPv4
and IPv6 using G.711 CODEC with riverbed modeller17.5.
On the migration of a large scale network from i pv4 to ipv6 environmentIJCNCJournal
This work mainly addresses the design a large scale network using dual stack mechanisms. We focused on
the most important theoretical concepts of the IPv6 protocol, such as addressing, address allocation,
routing with the OSPF and BGP protocols and routing protocols performance in dual stack network using
GNS3 and Wireshark simulators. we have a tendency to measure a perfect model and a true large-scale
network atmosphere victimization out there end-to-end activity techniques that focuses on a large-scale
IPv4 and IPv6 backbone and created performance the IPv4 and IPv6 network. In this paper, we compiled
IPv6 address planning in large scale network, performance statistics of each network in terms of TCP
throughput, delay jitters, packet loss rate, and round trip time. It is found that, a minor degradation within
the throughput of the TCP, delay jitter, a lower packet loss rate, and a rather longer round trip time are
occurred in a real large scale dual stack network
TRUST BASED ROUTING METRIC FOR RPL ROUTING PROTOCOL IN THE INTERNET OF THINGSpijans
While smart factories are becoming widely recognized as a fundamental concept of Industry 4.0, their implementation has posed several challenges insofar that they generate and process vast amounts of security critical and privacy sensitive data, in addition to the fact that they deploy IoT heterogeneous and constrained devices communicating with each other and being accessed ubiquitously through lossy networks. In this scenario, the routing of data is a specific area of concern especially with the inherent constraints and limiting properties of such devices like processing resources, memory capacity and battery life. To suit these constraints and to provide the required connectivity, the IETF has developed several standards, among them the RPL routing protocol for Low powerand Lossy Networks (LLNs). However, and even though RPL provides support for integrity and confidentiality of messages, its security may be compromised by several threats and attacks. We propose in this work TRM-RPL, a Trust based Routing Metric for the RPL protocol in an IIoT based environments. TRM-RPL uses a trust management mechanism to detect malicious behaviors and resist routing attacks while providing QoS guarantees. In addition, our model addresses both node and link trust and follows a multidimensional approach to enable
an accurate trust assessment for IoT entities. TRM-RPL is implemented, successfully tested and compared with the standard RPL protocol where its effectiveniness and resilience to attacks has been proved to be better.
Migration of corperate networks from ipv4 to ipv6 using dual stackpraveenReddy268
Migration of corperate networks from ipv4 to ipv6 using dual stack
in this you will be learning about internet protocols of version4 & 6.And also about OSI layers and their architecture and coding to the routers
May 13, 2013, Swiss IPv6 Council Member Event.
The Impact of IPv6 to Net Politics
CGN Killer IPv6
- Why CGN isn't a good concept for the future, but IPv6 is.
MIPV6 PROTOCOLS: A SURVEY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIScscpconf
As the future generation networks are envisioned to be heterogeneous in nature, seamless
mobility in such networks is an important issue. While IETF work groups have standardized
various mobility management protocols, such as Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), Fast Handovers for
Mobile IPv6 (Predictive FMIPv6, and Reactive FMIPv6), Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6),
Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) and Fast Handovers for PMIPv6 (Predictive FPMIPv6, and
Reactive FPMIPv6), out of which some are host based and some are network based, the
decision regarding which protocol suits the future networks is still a research issue. The study
of various mobility management protocols in terms handover latency and the number of hops is
needed to evaluate these protocols. Even though much study has been done in literature in terms
of handover latency, study still needs performance evaluation in terms of average hop delay. In
this paper we study various mobility management protocols by applying simple numerical
analysis. The study is carried out for performance evaluation of various mobility management
protocols in terms of average hop delay, wireless link delay, wired part delay, and binding
update and registration delay. In this work, the average hop delay is estimated in terms of total
handover latency and total number of hops contributing to each protocol. The study enables us
to make a few important observations regarding the performance of these mobility management
464XLAT Tutorial, by Masataka Mawatari.
Presented at the APNIC 40 "Hypes? Fanfares? Fads? Wading through the muddy IPv6 puddle" session, Wed 9 Sep 2015.
Internet draft presentation: Benchmarking Methodology for IPv6 Transition Technologies (draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-00). IETF 92, Dallas, Texas, USA
A Transport Layer and Socket API for (h)ICN: Design, Implementation and Perfo...Luca Muscariello
We present the design of a transport layer and socket
API that can be used in several ICN architectures such as NDN,
CCN and hICN. The current design makes it possible to expose an
API that is simple to insert in current applications and easy to use to
develop novel ones. The proliferation of connected applications for
very different use cases and services with wide spectrum of requirements suggests that several transport services will coexist in the
Internet. This is just about to happen with QUIC, MPTCP, LEDBAT
as the most notable ones but is expected to grow and diversify with
the advent of applications for 5G, IoT, MEC with heterogeneous
connectivity. The advantages of ICN have to be measurable from
the application, end-services and in the network, with relevant
key performance indicators. We have implemented an high speed
transport stack with most of the designed features that we present
in this paper with extensive experiments and benchmarks to show
the scalability of the current systems in different use cases
Network State Awareness & Troubleshooting, by Faraz Shamim.
A presentation given at APRICOT 2016’s Network State Awareness and Troubleshooting tutorial on 25 February 2016.
Today's Internet faces severe challenges including:
* IPv4 address exhaustion
* explosion of BGP tables and IP routing tables
* exponential traffic growth (which might not be a problem after all)
The issue of deploying IPv6 Technology has been a topic of debate for more than a decade now.
Professionals have been discussing on the transition from Internet Protocol version 4 (IPVv4) to Internet
Protocol version 6 (IPv6) due to the fact that the IPv4 address space would soon be exhausted.
In this paper, we analyse the IPv4 and IPv6 technologies and look at the benefits of migrating to IPv6,
its social implications, risks & challenges and the opportunities the IPv6 migration offers
"CHT IPv6 Measurement and Deployment" by Chia-Wei Tseng.
A presentation given at the APNIC 40 IPv6 Readiness Measurement BoF and APIPv6TF sessions on Wed 9 Sep 2015.
The ever-increasing demand for various multimedia applications and services as well as the need for bandwidth expansions and faster data rates are becoming a challenge for every data center everywhere.
Broadband India Forum Session on IPv6: The Post-IPocalypse InternetAPNIC
APNIC Chief Scientist Geoff Huston gave a presentation on the challenges of IPv6 implementation at the Broadband India Forum Session on IPv6, held online on 7 October 2021
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF OSPF AND RIP ON IPV4 & IPV6 TECHNOLOGY USING G.711 ...IJCNCJournal
Migration from IPv4 to IPv6 is still visibly slow, mainly because of the inherent cost involved in the implementation, hardware and software acquisition. However, there are many values IPv6 can bring to the
IP enabled environment as compared to IPv4, particularly for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) solutions. Many companies are drifting away from circuit based switching such as PSTN to packet based switching (VoIP) for collaboration. There are several factors determining the effective utilization and
quality of VoIP solutions. These include the choice of codec, echo control, packet loss, delay, delay variation (jitter), and the network topology. The network is basically the environment in which VoIP is deployed. State of art network design for VoIP technologies requires impeccable Interior Gateway routing
protocols that will reduce the convergence time of the network, in the event of a link failure. Choice of CODEC is also a main factor. Since most research work in this area did not consider a particular CODEC as a factor in determining performance, this paper will compare the behaviour of RIP and OSPF in IPv4
and IPv6 using G.711 CODEC with riverbed modeller17.5.
Performance Evaluation and Comparisons for IPv4&IPv6 using mpls Technologiesiosrjce
IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering(IOSR-JECE) is a double blind peer reviewed International Journal that provides rapid publication (within a month) of articles in all areas of electronics and communication engineering and its applications. The journal welcomes publications of high quality papers on theoretical developments and practical applications in electronics and communication engineering. Original research papers, state-of-the-art reviews, and high quality technical notes are invited for publications.
May 13, 2013, Swiss IPv6 Council Member Event.
The Impact of IPv6 to Net Politics
CGN Killer IPv6
- Why CGN isn't a good concept for the future, but IPv6 is.
MIPV6 PROTOCOLS: A SURVEY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIScscpconf
As the future generation networks are envisioned to be heterogeneous in nature, seamless
mobility in such networks is an important issue. While IETF work groups have standardized
various mobility management protocols, such as Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), Fast Handovers for
Mobile IPv6 (Predictive FMIPv6, and Reactive FMIPv6), Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6),
Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) and Fast Handovers for PMIPv6 (Predictive FPMIPv6, and
Reactive FPMIPv6), out of which some are host based and some are network based, the
decision regarding which protocol suits the future networks is still a research issue. The study
of various mobility management protocols in terms handover latency and the number of hops is
needed to evaluate these protocols. Even though much study has been done in literature in terms
of handover latency, study still needs performance evaluation in terms of average hop delay. In
this paper we study various mobility management protocols by applying simple numerical
analysis. The study is carried out for performance evaluation of various mobility management
protocols in terms of average hop delay, wireless link delay, wired part delay, and binding
update and registration delay. In this work, the average hop delay is estimated in terms of total
handover latency and total number of hops contributing to each protocol. The study enables us
to make a few important observations regarding the performance of these mobility management
464XLAT Tutorial, by Masataka Mawatari.
Presented at the APNIC 40 "Hypes? Fanfares? Fads? Wading through the muddy IPv6 puddle" session, Wed 9 Sep 2015.
Internet draft presentation: Benchmarking Methodology for IPv6 Transition Technologies (draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-00). IETF 92, Dallas, Texas, USA
A Transport Layer and Socket API for (h)ICN: Design, Implementation and Perfo...Luca Muscariello
We present the design of a transport layer and socket
API that can be used in several ICN architectures such as NDN,
CCN and hICN. The current design makes it possible to expose an
API that is simple to insert in current applications and easy to use to
develop novel ones. The proliferation of connected applications for
very different use cases and services with wide spectrum of requirements suggests that several transport services will coexist in the
Internet. This is just about to happen with QUIC, MPTCP, LEDBAT
as the most notable ones but is expected to grow and diversify with
the advent of applications for 5G, IoT, MEC with heterogeneous
connectivity. The advantages of ICN have to be measurable from
the application, end-services and in the network, with relevant
key performance indicators. We have implemented an high speed
transport stack with most of the designed features that we present
in this paper with extensive experiments and benchmarks to show
the scalability of the current systems in different use cases
Network State Awareness & Troubleshooting, by Faraz Shamim.
A presentation given at APRICOT 2016’s Network State Awareness and Troubleshooting tutorial on 25 February 2016.
Today's Internet faces severe challenges including:
* IPv4 address exhaustion
* explosion of BGP tables and IP routing tables
* exponential traffic growth (which might not be a problem after all)
The issue of deploying IPv6 Technology has been a topic of debate for more than a decade now.
Professionals have been discussing on the transition from Internet Protocol version 4 (IPVv4) to Internet
Protocol version 6 (IPv6) due to the fact that the IPv4 address space would soon be exhausted.
In this paper, we analyse the IPv4 and IPv6 technologies and look at the benefits of migrating to IPv6,
its social implications, risks & challenges and the opportunities the IPv6 migration offers
"CHT IPv6 Measurement and Deployment" by Chia-Wei Tseng.
A presentation given at the APNIC 40 IPv6 Readiness Measurement BoF and APIPv6TF sessions on Wed 9 Sep 2015.
The ever-increasing demand for various multimedia applications and services as well as the need for bandwidth expansions and faster data rates are becoming a challenge for every data center everywhere.
Broadband India Forum Session on IPv6: The Post-IPocalypse InternetAPNIC
APNIC Chief Scientist Geoff Huston gave a presentation on the challenges of IPv6 implementation at the Broadband India Forum Session on IPv6, held online on 7 October 2021
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF OSPF AND RIP ON IPV4 & IPV6 TECHNOLOGY USING G.711 ...IJCNCJournal
Migration from IPv4 to IPv6 is still visibly slow, mainly because of the inherent cost involved in the implementation, hardware and software acquisition. However, there are many values IPv6 can bring to the
IP enabled environment as compared to IPv4, particularly for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) solutions. Many companies are drifting away from circuit based switching such as PSTN to packet based switching (VoIP) for collaboration. There are several factors determining the effective utilization and
quality of VoIP solutions. These include the choice of codec, echo control, packet loss, delay, delay variation (jitter), and the network topology. The network is basically the environment in which VoIP is deployed. State of art network design for VoIP technologies requires impeccable Interior Gateway routing
protocols that will reduce the convergence time of the network, in the event of a link failure. Choice of CODEC is also a main factor. Since most research work in this area did not consider a particular CODEC as a factor in determining performance, this paper will compare the behaviour of RIP and OSPF in IPv4
and IPv6 using G.711 CODEC with riverbed modeller17.5.
Performance Evaluation and Comparisons for IPv4&IPv6 using mpls Technologiesiosrjce
IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering(IOSR-JECE) is a double blind peer reviewed International Journal that provides rapid publication (within a month) of articles in all areas of electronics and communication engineering and its applications. The journal welcomes publications of high quality papers on theoretical developments and practical applications in electronics and communication engineering. Original research papers, state-of-the-art reviews, and high quality technical notes are invited for publications.
Implementation of “Traslator Strategy” For Migration of Ipv4 to Ipv6IJERA Editor
This paper is focused on the Translator strategy for migration of IPv4 to Ipv6 implemented in Cisco packet
tracer. It describes the design and configuration of network devices and packet transfer between devices of IPv4
and IPv6 networks using NAT-PT as transition mechanism. First major version of IP, IPv4 is the dominant
protocol of internet.IPv6 is developed to deal with long anticipated problem of IPv4 running out of addresses.
The migration from IPv4 to IPv6 must be implemented node by node by using auto-configuration procedures to
eliminate the need to configure IPv6 hosts manually.
ANALYSIS OF IPV6 TRANSITION TECHNOLOGIESIJCNCJournal
Currently IPv6 is extremely popular with companies, organizations and Internet service providers (ISP)
due to the limitations of IPv4. In order to prevent an abrupt change from IPv4 to IPv6, three mechanisms
will be used to provide a smooth transition from IPv4 to IPv6 with minimum effect on the network. These
mechanisms are Dual-Stack, Tunnel and Translation. This research will shed the light on IPv4 and IPv6
and assess the automatic and manual transition strategies of the IPv6 by comparing their performances in
order to show how the transition strategy affects network behaviour. The experiment will be executed using
OPNET Modeler that simulates a network containing a Wide Area Network (WAN) , a Local Area Network
(LAN), hosts and servers. The results will be presented in graphs and tables, with further explanation. The
experiment will use different measurements such as throughput, latency (delay), queuing delay, and TCP
delay.
The aim of this dissertation project was to investigate and improve the performance of the two most popular link-state routing protocols when configured in IPv4/IPv6 dual-stack enterprise networks. The thesis intended to make the first step of scientific research in performance comparison of different routing protocols in IPv4-IPv6 coexistence dual stack ipv4 and ipv6 coexistence
This paper targets at a comparative study on the through-puts in bits/ seconds, packet through-puts, delay in networks, response time in seconds of both IPv4 and IPv6. Hence, since the system proposes for co-existence of both IPv4 and IPv6, the solution projected in this paper is “DUAL STACK where you can and TUNNEL where you have to”.
Similar to IRJET- Evaluating the Impact of IPv4 to IPv6 Tunneling with MPLS on VOIP (20)
We have compiled the most important slides from each speaker's presentation. This year’s compilation, available for free, captures the key insights and contributions shared during the DfMAy 2024 conference.
Literature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptxDr Ramhari Poudyal
Three-day training on academic research focuses on analytical tools at United Technical College, supported by the University Grant Commission, Nepal. 24-26 May 2024
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressionsVictor Morales
K8sGPT is a tool that analyzes and diagnoses Kubernetes clusters. This presentation was used to share the requirements and dependencies to deploy K8sGPT in a local environment.
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningSUTEJAS
This presentation explores the concept of inductive bias in machine learning. It explains how algorithms come with built-in assumptions and preferences that guide the learning process. You'll learn about the different types of inductive bias and how they can impact the performance and generalizability of machine learning models.
The presentation also covers the positive and negative aspects of inductive bias, along with strategies for mitigating potential drawbacks. We'll explore examples of how bias manifests in algorithms like neural networks and decision trees.
By understanding inductive bias, you can gain valuable insights into how machine learning models work and make informed decisions when building and deploying them.
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024Rahul
This document provides information about the third edition of the magazine "Sthapatya" published by the Association of Civil Engineers (Practicing) Aurangabad. It includes messages from current and past presidents of ACEP, memories and photos from past ACEP events, information on life time achievement awards given by ACEP, and a technical article on concrete maintenance, repairs and strengthening. The document highlights activities of ACEP and provides a technical educational article for members.
Using recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) for pavements is crucial to achieving sustainability. Implementing RCA for new pavement can minimize carbon footprint, conserve natural resources, reduce harmful emissions, and lower life cycle costs. Compared to natural aggregate (NA), RCA pavement has fewer comprehensive studies and sustainability assessments.
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...Amil Baba Dawood bangali
Contact with Dawood Bhai Just call on +92322-6382012 and we'll help you. We'll solve all your problems within 12 to 24 hours and with 101% guarantee and with astrology systematic. If you want to take any personal or professional advice then also you can call us on +92322-6382012 , ONLINE LOVE PROBLEM & Other all types of Daily Life Problem's.Then CALL or WHATSAPP us on +92322-6382012 and Get all these problems solutions here by Amil Baba DAWOOD BANGALI
#vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore#blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #blackmagicforlove #blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #Amilbabainuk #amilbabainspain #amilbabaindubai #Amilbabainnorway #amilbabainkrachi #amilbabainlahore #amilbabaingujranwalan #amilbabainislamabad