This document discusses transitioning IPv4 network applications to IPv6. It begins with an introduction to the need for IPv6 due to IPv4 address depletion. It then discusses IPv6 architecture and some key benefits of IPv6 like increased address space and built-in security. The document outlines three primary considerations for transitioning applications: using IPv6 multicast instead of IPv4 broadcast, enabling multicast reception, and ensuring dual stack compatibility. It categorizes transition complexity and provides examples of changes needed, such as replacing IPv4 data structures and function calls with IPv6 equivalents. Related work on transitioning applications is also discussed.
On the migration of a large scale network from i pv4 to ipv6 environmentIJCNCJournal
This work mainly addresses the design a large scale network using dual stack mechanisms. We focused on
the most important theoretical concepts of the IPv6 protocol, such as addressing, address allocation,
routing with the OSPF and BGP protocols and routing protocols performance in dual stack network using
GNS3 and Wireshark simulators. we have a tendency to measure a perfect model and a true large-scale
network atmosphere victimization out there end-to-end activity techniques that focuses on a large-scale
IPv4 and IPv6 backbone and created performance the IPv4 and IPv6 network. In this paper, we compiled
IPv6 address planning in large scale network, performance statistics of each network in terms of TCP
throughput, delay jitters, packet loss rate, and round trip time. It is found that, a minor degradation within
the throughput of the TCP, delay jitter, a lower packet loss rate, and a rather longer round trip time are
occurred in a real large scale dual stack network
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF OSPF AND RIP ON IPV4 & IPV6 TECHNOLOGY USING G.711 ...IJCNCJournal
Migration from IPv4 to IPv6 is still visibly slow, mainly because of the inherent cost involved in the implementation, hardware and software acquisition. However, there are many values IPv6 can bring to the
IP enabled environment as compared to IPv4, particularly for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) solutions. Many companies are drifting away from circuit based switching such as PSTN to packet based switching (VoIP) for collaboration. There are several factors determining the effective utilization and
quality of VoIP solutions. These include the choice of codec, echo control, packet loss, delay, delay variation (jitter), and the network topology. The network is basically the environment in which VoIP is deployed. State of art network design for VoIP technologies requires impeccable Interior Gateway routing
protocols that will reduce the convergence time of the network, in the event of a link failure. Choice of CODEC is also a main factor. Since most research work in this area did not consider a particular CODEC as a factor in determining performance, this paper will compare the behaviour of RIP and OSPF in IPv4
and IPv6 using G.711 CODEC with riverbed modeller17.5.
On the migration of a large scale network from i pv4 to ipv6 environmentIJCNCJournal
This work mainly addresses the design a large scale network using dual stack mechanisms. We focused on
the most important theoretical concepts of the IPv6 protocol, such as addressing, address allocation,
routing with the OSPF and BGP protocols and routing protocols performance in dual stack network using
GNS3 and Wireshark simulators. we have a tendency to measure a perfect model and a true large-scale
network atmosphere victimization out there end-to-end activity techniques that focuses on a large-scale
IPv4 and IPv6 backbone and created performance the IPv4 and IPv6 network. In this paper, we compiled
IPv6 address planning in large scale network, performance statistics of each network in terms of TCP
throughput, delay jitters, packet loss rate, and round trip time. It is found that, a minor degradation within
the throughput of the TCP, delay jitter, a lower packet loss rate, and a rather longer round trip time are
occurred in a real large scale dual stack network
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF OSPF AND RIP ON IPV4 & IPV6 TECHNOLOGY USING G.711 ...IJCNCJournal
Migration from IPv4 to IPv6 is still visibly slow, mainly because of the inherent cost involved in the implementation, hardware and software acquisition. However, there are many values IPv6 can bring to the
IP enabled environment as compared to IPv4, particularly for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) solutions. Many companies are drifting away from circuit based switching such as PSTN to packet based switching (VoIP) for collaboration. There are several factors determining the effective utilization and
quality of VoIP solutions. These include the choice of codec, echo control, packet loss, delay, delay variation (jitter), and the network topology. The network is basically the environment in which VoIP is deployed. State of art network design for VoIP technologies requires impeccable Interior Gateway routing
protocols that will reduce the convergence time of the network, in the event of a link failure. Choice of CODEC is also a main factor. Since most research work in this area did not consider a particular CODEC as a factor in determining performance, this paper will compare the behaviour of RIP and OSPF in IPv4
and IPv6 using G.711 CODEC with riverbed modeller17.5.
Implementation of isp mpls backbone network on i pv6 using 6 pe routers main PPTSatish Kumar
MINI PPT
IPv6 (Internet Protocol version 6) is a revision of the Internet Protocol (IP) developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). IPv6 is intended to succeed IPv4.
IPv6 implements a new addressing system that allows for far more addresses to be assigned than with Ipv4.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is deployed by many service providers for establishing their backbone networks.
The Cisco implementation of IPv6 provider edge router over MPLS is called 6PE,and it enables IPv6 sites to communicate with each other over an MPLS IPv4 core network using MPLS label switched paths.
IPv6 is rapidly becoming an important
network technology to service providers,
government agencies and enterprises.
Deployment of IPv6 requires new management strategies, practices and tools to enable deployment and effective operation.
Because most deployments of IPv6 will be in dual-stack networks that use IPv4 and IPv6 in parallel, the IPv4 management infrastructure will be extended for IPv6 for integrated IPv4-IPv6 operation. It will be
crucial for IPv6 deployments to be carefully
planned and managed to ensure successful
implementation and avoid significant
increases in management overhead. This
article provides some background information
on IPv6 deployment and management
strategies.
International Journal of Engineering Research and DevelopmentIJERD Editor
Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering,
Information Engineering and Technology,
Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,
Automation and Mechatronics Engineering,
Material and Chemical Engineering,
Civil and Architecture Engineering,
Biotechnology and Bio Engineering,
Environmental Engineering,
Petroleum and Mining Engineering,
Marine and Agriculture engineering,
Aerospace Engineering.
Basics of IPv6 networking. Addressing, stateless autoconfiguration and other IPv6 features explained. We will introduce features supported by RouterOS and explain how to build dual-stack network. We will also show how to obtain your own IPv6 prefix in case where there no possibility to get IPv6 connectivity natively. Live examples of configuration of IPv6 routing protocols. Presentation will cover the features and differences between IPv4 and IPv6 implementations. Lecture focuses on OSPFv3 but we will also explain RIPng and BGP configuration.
Implementation of “Traslator Strategy” For Migration of Ipv4 to Ipv6IJERA Editor
This paper is focused on the Translator strategy for migration of IPv4 to Ipv6 implemented in Cisco packet
tracer. It describes the design and configuration of network devices and packet transfer between devices of IPv4
and IPv6 networks using NAT-PT as transition mechanism. First major version of IP, IPv4 is the dominant
protocol of internet.IPv6 is developed to deal with long anticipated problem of IPv4 running out of addresses.
The migration from IPv4 to IPv6 must be implemented node by node by using auto-configuration procedures to
eliminate the need to configure IPv6 hosts manually.
Implementation of isp mpls backbone network on i pv6 using 6 pe routers main PPTSatish Kumar
MINI PPT
IPv6 (Internet Protocol version 6) is a revision of the Internet Protocol (IP) developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). IPv6 is intended to succeed IPv4.
IPv6 implements a new addressing system that allows for far more addresses to be assigned than with Ipv4.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is deployed by many service providers for establishing their backbone networks.
The Cisco implementation of IPv6 provider edge router over MPLS is called 6PE,and it enables IPv6 sites to communicate with each other over an MPLS IPv4 core network using MPLS label switched paths.
IPv6 is rapidly becoming an important
network technology to service providers,
government agencies and enterprises.
Deployment of IPv6 requires new management strategies, practices and tools to enable deployment and effective operation.
Because most deployments of IPv6 will be in dual-stack networks that use IPv4 and IPv6 in parallel, the IPv4 management infrastructure will be extended for IPv6 for integrated IPv4-IPv6 operation. It will be
crucial for IPv6 deployments to be carefully
planned and managed to ensure successful
implementation and avoid significant
increases in management overhead. This
article provides some background information
on IPv6 deployment and management
strategies.
International Journal of Engineering Research and DevelopmentIJERD Editor
Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering,
Information Engineering and Technology,
Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,
Automation and Mechatronics Engineering,
Material and Chemical Engineering,
Civil and Architecture Engineering,
Biotechnology and Bio Engineering,
Environmental Engineering,
Petroleum and Mining Engineering,
Marine and Agriculture engineering,
Aerospace Engineering.
Basics of IPv6 networking. Addressing, stateless autoconfiguration and other IPv6 features explained. We will introduce features supported by RouterOS and explain how to build dual-stack network. We will also show how to obtain your own IPv6 prefix in case where there no possibility to get IPv6 connectivity natively. Live examples of configuration of IPv6 routing protocols. Presentation will cover the features and differences between IPv4 and IPv6 implementations. Lecture focuses on OSPFv3 but we will also explain RIPng and BGP configuration.
Implementation of “Traslator Strategy” For Migration of Ipv4 to Ipv6IJERA Editor
This paper is focused on the Translator strategy for migration of IPv4 to Ipv6 implemented in Cisco packet
tracer. It describes the design and configuration of network devices and packet transfer between devices of IPv4
and IPv6 networks using NAT-PT as transition mechanism. First major version of IP, IPv4 is the dominant
protocol of internet.IPv6 is developed to deal with long anticipated problem of IPv4 running out of addresses.
The migration from IPv4 to IPv6 must be implemented node by node by using auto-configuration procedures to
eliminate the need to configure IPv6 hosts manually.
IPv4 vs. IPv6: How we got here
Conclusion
With IPv4 address pools rapidly disappearing and a federal mandate for government agency devices to begin shifting to IPv6-only and telecom 5G with IoT and edge devices, it’s clear that IPv6 is the future. Transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 can be a challenge, so organizations may be interested to learn that switching to IPv6 has the potential to improve performance. In our testing without the Broadcom Offload feature, IPv6 delivered comparable performance to IPv4 on write workloads and better performance on read workloads while also reducing CPU utilization. When we enabled the Broadcom Offload feature on both IPv6 and IPv4, read workload performance increased dramatically and CPU utilization on both read and write workloads improved. Whether your organization is transitioning to IPv6 right away or choosing to delay the shift, this feature can boost performance on read workloads, which can improve the experience for users, reduce backup windows, and allow databases to load more quickly.
ANALYSIS OF IPV6 TRANSITION TECHNOLOGIESIJCNCJournal
Currently IPv6 is extremely popular with companies, organizations and Internet service providers (ISP)
due to the limitations of IPv4. In order to prevent an abrupt change from IPv4 to IPv6, three mechanisms
will be used to provide a smooth transition from IPv4 to IPv6 with minimum effect on the network. These
mechanisms are Dual-Stack, Tunnel and Translation. This research will shed the light on IPv4 and IPv6
and assess the automatic and manual transition strategies of the IPv6 by comparing their performances in
order to show how the transition strategy affects network behaviour. The experiment will be executed using
OPNET Modeler that simulates a network containing a Wide Area Network (WAN) , a Local Area Network
(LAN), hosts and servers. The results will be presented in graphs and tables, with further explanation. The
experiment will use different measurements such as throughput, latency (delay), queuing delay, and TCP
delay.
Running head NEW INTERNET PROTOCOL PAPER1NEW INTERNET PROTOC.docxtoltonkendal
Running head: NEW INTERNET PROTOCOL PAPER1
NEW INTERNET PROTOCOL PAPER2
New Internet Protocol Paper
Tharun Gopal
IST 7040
Wilmington University
Introduction
Internet Protocol from 6 (IPv6) is the late conformity of the Internet convention and the fundamental model of the convention will be thoroughly utilized. IPv6 is genuinely a new drawing nearer closer tradition made to join all the possible needs associated with prospective web that apparent as Internet shape 2. This convention has its herald IPv4, limits for the framework level .3. In addition to their giving of a huge amount of sensible location region, this protocol offers sufficient attributes to address the disadvantage of IPv4.
As of recently, IPv4 has confirmed independent from anyone else like a capable routable tending to convention and offered every one of us for a long time upon their best-exertion conveyance framework. It had been produced in the before 80s and would not acquire any imperative alteration later. Amid the season of their introduction to the world web has been confined essentially to some instructive establishments for their examination and to the division of assurance. Alongside IPv4's location zone weakness, IPv6 is as of now tackling the administration or supervision of web, which is some of the time called Internet form 2. On June 06, 2012 the web organization formally discharged IPv6. Today numerous ISPs have been giving IPv6 upon open site and need to keep up this executed. Each of the device makers likewise partook to give IPv6 naturally permitted on items. This is a stage to persuade web organization to move to IPv6.
IPv6 Variations
· By completing this new tradition the area degrees get extended, which can help to convey plus or minus three hundred and forty trillion stand-out IP addresses.
· To grow the guiding efficiency the header is more made strides.
· Extension and decisions support are fused to engage all around sorted out sending.
· Also develop the affirmation and payload embodiment.
Why is IPv6 Required?
As everyone is careful that the IPv4 convention is missing the mark on its area space. Since one another day over the world, there is an augmentation in the use of PC's, mobile phones, tablets, gaming structures, and diverse machines which expected to join with the web. With its 128-bit area position, IPv6 can reinforce 3.4 x 1038 or 341,283,365,92,1938,464,465,372,608,432,764,212,459 novel IP addresses. Moreover, differentiating and the IPv4 convention the area range is adequately broad to plan an intriguing area on every contraption.
Impact of Migrating to IPv6
The move has begun in perspective of the essential and the requirement for improvement of area space for inevitable applications. Fig.2 identifies with the development-organizing model. Early on step is to get ready for IPv6 to ensure business movement. Game plan step should be all that much organized, so that layout and assembling doesn't end up being pointlessl ...
New Network ProtocolRunning Head New Network Protocol Pap.docxcurwenmichaela
New Network Protocol
Running Head: New Network Protocol Paper
Data Communication and Networking
New Network Protocol Paper
Table Of Contents
Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 3
Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3
History ................................................................................................................................. 4
Need for IPV6 and Disadvantages of IPv4 .......................................................................... 4
Advantages of IPV6 ............................................................................................................. 5
Statistics ................................................................................................................................ 6
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 6
References ............................................................................................................................. 8
Abstract
In today's world as technology is growing people are looking to adopt new technologies which offer them a feasible and easy access to the resources with a security that makes them away from common threats. This paper introduces the introduction to the internet protocols and concept of the IPV4 and IPV6, as well what are the disadvantages in the IPV4 and the advantages in IPV6. This paper describes the future concepts of the IPV6 and the future impact of the IPV6 on the network field by describing a brief history of the internet protocols and the statistical representation of the IPV6 users.
Introduction
Transport layer is the basic layer in the OSI and the TCP/IP model. The basic task of this layer is to send or receive the data or voice and video data grams or packets over the internet. IPV 4 is meant for Internet Protocol version 4. The network protocol that has been used in the Internet since its inception is IPv4 , which provides 2^32 distinct addresses. Its successor IPv6(Internet Protocol Version 6) provides 2^128 addresses, but IPv6 adoption has not proceeded as quickly as its designers expected (Erik Kline,2011). The main need for the migration to IPV6 from IPV4 is mainly for the ip addresses . IPv4 provides approximately 4.3 billion of ip addresses but there is a need for more ip addresses. For that reason they introduced IPV6.
History
The current trend of the Internet Protocol IPv4 was initially grown in the 1970s, and the primary convention standard RFC 791 that administers IPv4 usefulness was distributed in 1981. With the remarkable extension of Internet use - particularly by highly populated nations like India and China. The approaching deficiency of loca ...
Similar to Ieee Transition Of I Pv4 To I Pv6 Network Applications (20)
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionAggregage
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
“An Outlook of the Ongoing and Future Relationship between Blockchain Technologies and Process-aware Information Systems.” Invited talk at the joint workshop on Blockchain for Information Systems (BC4IS) and Blockchain for Trusted Data Sharing (B4TDS), co-located with with the 36th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 3 June 2024, Limassol, Cyprus.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
Maruthi Prithivirajan, Head of ASEAN & IN Solution Architecture, Neo4j
Get an inside look at the latest Neo4j innovations that enable relationship-driven intelligence at scale. Learn more about the newest cloud integrations and product enhancements that make Neo4j an essential choice for developers building apps with interconnected data and generative AI.
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
Ieee Transition Of I Pv4 To I Pv6 Network Applications
1. Transition of IPv4 Network Applications to
IPv6 Applications [TIPv4 toTIPv6]
Hanumanthappa, J.1 and Manjaiah, D. H.2
1
Dos in Computer Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore, 2Reader, Mangalore University,
Mangalagangothri, Mangalore, Phone No: +91821-2419552;
Fax: +91821-2510789, Fax: (91)(0824)2287567/2287424.
Email: hanumsbe@gmail.com; ylm321@yahoo.co.in
Abstract besides adding new functionality. In addition
to the upgrade to 128- bit addresses, the IPv6
In this Paper we discuss our experience for transition the packet format was redesigned in order to
IPv4 network applications to IPv6 network applications. This overcome the limitations of IPv4[3].
paper also discusses how to port an IPv4 broadcast
application to IPv6 in this IPv6 has no implemented concept One of the key features of IPv6 is Porting or
of broadcast. These extensions are designed to provide Transition. The deployment of this new
access to the basic IPv6 features required by TCP and UDP protocol brings set of new challenges to the
applications, including multicasting, while introducing a application developers and application service
minimum of change into the system and providing complete providers. Currently many vendors and
compatibility for existing IPv4 applications. We have manufacturers and internet service providers
discussed number of issues arising during the transition of a are working hard to provide IPv6 connectivity
platform to IPv6 like which would be the easiest and simple and support for the users. The transition phase
approach to the transition procedure, how compatibility with from IPv4 to IPv6 has raised many discussions
earlier IPv4 only versions of the platform could be retained, among the internet community, as a lot of
if there are any useful tools for assisting this task how and companies and network demonstrators are
when one could be positive that the necessary modifications reluctant, facing what they perceive face as a
had been made, and which testing procedures should be great challenge with large costs. Apart from the
followed. network and hardware part of the issue , a very
well known important aspect is the
transition(modification) of existing
1. Introduction. applications so that they become IPv6 enabled
The rapid growth in the number of handheld devices and .The problem of transition existing applications
protocols putting a strain on the current IP protocol to IPv6 has been so far addressed by several
(IPv4),which is not being able to keep pace with the researchers including companies and academic
increasing demands brought about by the evolving Internet. institutes. The majority of network applications
The internet is growing rapidly and the number of available in existence today presume the use of the IPv4
Internet addresses seemed to be insufficient to meet the future protocol, so the transition to IPv6 has to be
needs of the current Internet. As a response , the Internet accompanied by the development of new
engineering task force(IETF) introduced the Internet protocol applications or the modification of existing
version 6 (IPv6) as a substitute for the current Internet ones, so that they can be used in IPv6
protocol(IPv4).[27].We know that IPv6 has been designed to environments. It has often been demonstrated
remove all the defects and deficiencies of IPv4 [24].The new that the difficulty of modifying existing
version of IP, IPv6 constitutes an effort to overcome the applications varies significantly from one case
inborn limitations of IPv4 so that the new protocol is able to to another. Depending upon the applications at
respond to the new requirements of today s internet. However hand, it can be either a relatively quick and
many network architects and engineers are still unsure of easy process or a more complicated and
what all of potential business cases for building IPv6 resource consuming task.
networks and services are[24].IPv6 as the successor to the
two decades old IPv4 has been designed to be a evolutionary The remainder of the paper is organized as
protocol which will solve the address shortage problem follows. Section 2 presents IPv4 to IPv6
2. Architecture. In Section 3 the benefits of IPv6 are presented. Let s discuss some of the benefits of IPv6 in
Performance aspects of transition IPv4 network applications more detail in order to see how this protocol
to IPv6 are discussed in section 4. Section 5 presents the attempts to deal with the Internet and business
work which has done on transition of IPv4 to IPv6. Section 6 network problems of today. Some of the main
covers necessary APIs for the transition of IPv4 to IPv6. reasons for the development of the new version
Backward compatibility with IPv4 by using Dual stack of the Internet Protocol were the exhaustion of
has covered in section 7. Section 7.1 covers application the Class B address space, the growth of the
impact on Java. Section 8 covers problems with IPv6 backbone routing table, security issues, IP
transition. Section 9 and 10 covers the flow chart for options size limitation, and routing
transition from IPv4 to IPv6. Finally the paper is concluded performance [24]. We ll look at the two main
in section 10. problems solved by IPv6 namely address
depletion and routing scalability in more
detail, and then look at some of the added
2. Literature Review benefits that IPv6 gives to network designers
and administrators[12].The goals of IPv6 were
2.1 IPv4 to IPv6 Architecture to support scalability, security, and multimedia
transmissions. First, the address space is
Internet Protocol was first developed in the early 1980s. The increased from 32 bits to 128 bits. Unlike IPv4,
issues that made version 4 of the Internet Protocol (IPv4) IP Sec [10] support has become a requirement
inadequate required complex solutions[24]. This has forced in the IPv6 header. Payload identification for
designers of the new protocol to work diligently to ensure QoS handling by routers is now supported by
that the same issues would not be encountered with the new the Flow Label field in the IPv6 packet header.
version of the protocol. Members of the Internet community Fragmentation support has been moved from
who were responsible for developing the protocol carefully routers to the sending hosts. The IPv6 header
scrutinized each new Request for Comments (RFC) that was does not include a checksum and has no
developed. For those not familiar with the RFC process, options included in the header, but rather
RFCs are documents that detail the protocol specifications so introduces extension headers. Finally, IPv6
that hardware and software manufacturers will know how to requires no manual configuration or DHCP
implement the protocol in a standard and agreed-upon (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol), which
manner. Standardization enables each manufacturer and will become important as the number of nodes
software vendor to follow the same blueprint rather than increases. Overall, IPv6 was carefully thought
developing proprietary versions of the protocol.(This was a out and was designed with future applications
common problem with earlier networking protocols.). in mind. [11] The main difference in the packet
Internet will continue to grow at the rate it was growing, the layout between IPv4 and IPv6 is that IPv4 has
IPv4 address space would be depleted by the turn of the a 20 byte header while IPv6 has a 40 byte
millennium. Some temporary solutions were offered, such as header. Although the address space in IPv6 is
NAT (Network Address Translator) or CIDR . (Classless four times the size of its counterpart, IPv6 has
Inter Domain Routing) , however work began on a new reduced the number of required fields and
Internet Protocol, namely IPv6. The main reason for a new made them optional as extension headers.
version of the Internet Protocol was to increase the address Since the Ethernet MTU size is 1514 bytes, the
space; IPv6 was designed with a 128 bit address scheme, additional 20 bytes of header information only
enough to label every molecule on the surface of the earth incurs an additional 1.3% overhead; an
with a unique address. Furthermore, the only kind of traffic additional 20 bytes of header information when
that existed on the internet twenty years ago was elastic an IPv6 packet is encapsulated in an IPv4
traffic, such as emails or file transfers. These kinds of traffic packet raises the overall overhead to 2.6%. In
were very flexible regardless of the network conditions; on theory, this performance overhead between
the other hand, inelastic traffic requires a certain level of these two protocols is minimal.
guaranteed performance, which if not met, the application
does not have the same usefulness.IPv6 was designed for 2.3.Performance aspects of transition IPv4
efficiently suptransition both elastic and inelastic traffic. The network applications to IPv6.
realization of a new, scalable protocol in which considerable
thought has been given to future expansion is a very exciting In order to perform comparative testing, we
concept. Never before has the Internet community seen such first try to identify the criteria for evaluating
a magnitude of effort or planning put into the development of the IPv4 and IPv6 versions of the application
a new protocol, and there has certainly never been a protocol under test. We know that the IPv6 header is
more specifically tailored to the growth of the Internet. larger than IPv4, so we will face lot of
overheads in IPv6.When we will contrast the
2.2 Understanding the Benefits of IPv6 overhead of IPv6 with IPv4 is really a crucial
task because lot of issues are involved in
IPv6.
3. applications of transition. While transition an
3. IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Mechanisms application from IPv4 to IPv6 a network
application will get an ability to work with IPv6
While transition an IPv6 application some considerations are due to this obviously the application will have to
seamlessly work with IPv6 protocol. During the
needed in both server and client side. The most notable transition of an application the IPv6 supports the
consideration when preparing to port an IPv4 broadcast three major types of communication systems like
application to IPv6 is this IPv6 has no implemented concept multi cast, Uni cast and Any cast, where the
multicast communication is more useful for real
of broadcast [23].Instead, IPv6 uses multicast, Multicast for time audio, video and multimedia applications. An
IPv6 can emulate traditional broadcast capabilities found in IPv6 client can communicate with IPv4 server
only if it uses its IPv4 -mapped IPv6 address. This
IPv4.Setting the IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP socket option can be achieved by using domain name service
with the IPv6 address set to the link-local scope all nodes mechanism and choosing the record which is
returned to the client as the server s IPv4-mapped
address (FF02::1) is equivalent to broadcasting on IPv4
IPv6 address. In an IPv6 the role of DNS
broadcast addresses using the SO_BROADCAST socket mechanism plays a very important role for the
option[23].This address is sometimes called the all-nodes communication between IPv4 and IPv6 even
though IPv6 supports for Multiple DNS. It is
multicast group. For applications that simply want broadcast beneficiary if the application can make use of the
emulation for IPv6, that approach is operationally equivalent. new enhanced features of IPv6, so that these
features can be examined and evaluated. For
One notable difference with IPv6, however, is that multicasts
example IPv6 which contains the flow id label that
on the all-nodes multicast group address are not received by can be used in order to implement some quality
default (IPv4 broadcasts are received by default). Application of service scheme. The Dual stack mechanism is
going to be widely used for the foreseeable future,
programmers must use the IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP so an IPv6 enabled application has to be able to
socket option to enable multicast reception from any source, operate in a system with dual stack node has both
including the all-nodes multicast group address[23].There are IPv6 and IPv4 stacks and addresses.
two primary scenarios for application programmers using 5.Related Work
multicast: those transition from IPv4 broadcast (or multicast)
applications to IPv6, and those creating new IPv6 multicast Although transition an application from IPv4 to
IPv6 is not a difficult task. There are many hidden
applications. For transition existing applications, there are problems that must be considered and carefully
two options to move to IPv6 multicast: using socket options analyzed. The problem of transition existing
and using IOCTLs [23].By using socket options is a change- applications to IPv6 has been so far addressed by
several researchers including companies and an
based approach, which enables developer to change the academic institutes. One of the main objectives
socket properties as required for blocking or unblocking a when implementing IPv6 in UnixWare was to
provide a migration path to IPv6 while still
sender, adding a new source, and so on. This approach is enabling IPv4 applications to work .This paper is
more intuitive and the recommended approach [23].By using aimed to discuss about various issues when
IOCTL is a final state based approach because it allows transition an IPv4 application to IPv6 with focus
on issues that an application developer will face
developers to provide a fully-configured socket state, rather than a complete API reference. The
including inclusion and exclusion lists with one call[23]. transition of labels can be categorized into some
main categories based on complexity of the work
[21].
4. EVALUATING AN APPLICATION PORTED TO IPV6
Category-1:- The below table shows changes in
There are various parameters that we have to tested during thethe source code data structures that application
transition of IPv4 network application to IPv6 networkprogrammers need to be aware of when
application which determines the quality and varioustransition code support IPv6
IPv4 Data structures IPv6 Data structures
Sockaddr_in ,in_addr4 Sockaddr_in6, in_addr6
sin_family , sin_port Sin6_family , sin6_len, sin6_port
Inaddr_any,inaddr_loopback In6_addr, In6_addr_loopback
In6_addr_any_init, In6addr_loopback_init
4. ifreq Struct if_laddrreq
ifconf Struct if_laddrconf
in_port_t sin_port u_shortsin6_port
sin_addr struct in_addr uint32_tsin6_flowinfo
The first category of the work refers to most protocol independent labels where the labels can be easily ported by
using data structures.IPv4 applications use the sockaddr_in andmembers to their new sockaddr_in6 names, it
in_addr structures to pass network address information betweenis not strictly necessary to fill in this member
certain networking related functions. IPv6 uses a larger addressbefore using the structure [13].
space and therefore uses different data structures to replace
sockaddr_in and in_addr [13]. Category-2. While the 2nd category refers to
labels that can be ported by introducing new API
in6_addr:-is used to store the 128-bit network to replace old ones:- One of the main objectives
address.sockaddr_in6 :-is used to store the remaining details, when implementing IPv6 in UnixWare was to
previously stored by sockaddr_in, that is, length of the data provide a migration path to IPv6 while still
structure, address family, flowinfo, port number and enabling IPv4 applications to work portability ,
in6_addr data structure. Replace any occurrence of Scalability automatically increases. The Below
sockaddr_in with the sockaddr_in6 structure. Another table cover in depth how the source code symbol
feature that was implemented at the same time as IPv6 was changes some of the address and protocol family
the move to support variable length sockets. In this new constants for IPv6 that application programmers
version the sin6_family is only 8-bits long unlike the original need to be aware of when transition code support
sin_family which was 16-bits long. The remaining 8 bits have IPv6[13].
been defined as sin6_len, and contains the length of the data
structure. When modifying the sockaddr_in structure
Search the Source code for : Replace with
AF_INET PF_INET6
PF_INET PF_INET6
Replace all occurrences of AF_INET in your application
with AF_INET6 and all occurrences of PF_INET with Category-3.While the 3rd criteria refers to labels
PF_INET6. For example, if you application had the that can be ported by using new IPv4 functions
following line of code[13]: calls to IPv6 function calls. The below tables
server.sin_family = AF_INET; cover the some changes in the source code
alter the member name to its correct sockaddr_in6 name and function calls that application programmers need
change AF_INET to AF_INET6, as shown below: to be aware of when transition code support
server.sin6_family = AF_INET6; IPv6[13].
IPv4 function calls IPv6 function calls
gethostbyname(3N) gethostbyname2(3N)
or getaddrinfo( ) or
getipnodebyname ,freeaddrinfo()
inetaddr_in(3N) inetpton(3N)
inet_ntoa inet_ntop
gethostbyaddr() getipnodebyaddr,
getnameinfo(),f
reeaddrinfo().
inet_addr() or inet_aton() inet_ pton()
6. NECESSARY API MODIFICATIONS In order to port the IPv4 network applications to
IPv6 we have used some of the methods. Some of
5. the methods are straight forward modifications that we have toboth versions of the Internet Protocol, IPv4 and
carry out during the transition tenure. While transition an IPv4IPv6. A general property of a dual-stack node
applications to IPv6 using socket interface extensions to IPv6is that an IPv6 socket can communicate both
some considerations are needed in both server and client sidewith an IPv4 and IPv6 peer at the transport
[21]. While using IPv4 to IPv6 transition the most importantlayer (TCP or UDP) . At the native level, the
methods are we have to replace IPv4 API s likeIPv6 socket communicates with an IPv4 peer
AF_INET,PF_INET with their IPv6 AF_INET6 and PF_INET6through an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address.
.The second important method used while during transition isHowever, unless a socket checks for the peers
substituting IPv4 function calls toIPv6 functions calls. The thirdaddress type, it won't know whether it is
important aspect while using a transition is adjust Keyboard andtalking to an IPv4 or an IPv6 peer. All the
display interface so they can handle larger IP addresses. Theinternal plumbing and conversion of address
fourth one more important API consideration is Name to addresstypes is done by the dual-protocol stack.
translation. The Fifth necessary consideration for API is New
function will support to IPv6 and IPv4.Transition from IPv4 to 7.1.Application Impact on Java
IPv6 application also requires replacement of hard- coded IPv4
loop back addresses and inaddr_any by using their IPv6 capable.
While transition an application there should be
At the time of transition an application no change in Java application code if
from IPv4 to IPv6 will separate port addresses from the IPeverything has been done appropriately. i.e.
addresses. Some time we will adopt minimum number ofthere are no direct references to IPv4 literal
changes in API for transition process. addresses, instead hostnames are used. All the
address or socket type information is
7. BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY WITH IPV4 BY encapsulated in the Java networking API.
USING DUAL STACK. Through setting system properties, address
type and/or socket type preferences can be set.
For many years, if not forever, there will be a mix of IPv6 For new applications IPv6-specific new classes
and IPv4 nodes on the Internet. Thus compatibility with the and APIs can be used [26].
large installed base of IPv4 nodes is crucial for the success of
the transition from IPv4 to IPv6. Dual stack, defined in RFC
1933, is one of the main mechanisms for guaranteeing a
smooth transition. The other mechanism is IPv6 packet
tunneling, which is relevant to the JDK only through the
IPv4-compatible address. The former is the most relevant
piece to the JDK. A dual stack includes implementations of
Communication Scenarios
(Nodes) V4 only V4/V6 V6 only
V4 only X X
V4/V6 X X X
V6 only X X
The X indicates the nodes which are communicate with each other.
UDP Scenario 1: Either host1 or host 2 can be a native application.
will wait for connections. Since host1 supports
Case 1: host1 is server, host2 is client : If host2 wants to talk v4 only, it creates a v4-type socket. They
to host1, it will create a V6 socket. It then looks up the IP resolves the name for host2. It only gets v4
address for host1. Since host1 only has a v4 protocol stack, it address for host2, since it doesn't understand
will only have IPv4 records in the name lookup service. So IPv6 address. So it connects to host2 using v4
host2 will try to reach host1 using an IPv4-mapped address. address. A v4 packet will be sent on the wire.
An IPv4 packet will be sent by host2, and host1 will think it On host2, the dual stack will convert the v4
is communicating with a v4 client [26]. packet
Case 2 : Host1 is client, host2 is server : If host2 is the
server, it will first create a v6-type socket (by default), then it
6. One of the difficulty of transition applications will
into a v6 packet with a v4-mapped address in it and hand it vary greatly from one application to another
over to the v6 socket. The server application will handle it as application depends on the choice of Coding
if it is a connection from a v6 node[ 26] . metaphors , Memory management ,Possibility of
8. Problems With IPv6 Transition library interface problems , Time and cost
estimates are likely to be inaccurate[18].
9.FLOW CHART FOR AN IPV4 CLIENT TO IPV6 CLIENT
Get_list_of_IP_addresses
List_of_IP_addr
esses = = null
Yes
No
Create_Socket(address_family)
Protocol not suppport
error? ?
No
Connect_Socket
error?
No
No Socket
Socket connected
7. 10.FLOW CHART FOR AN IPV4 SERVER TO IPV6 SERVER.
get_list_of_IP_addresses
no
list_of_IP_addresses==null||max
Sock==2
Yes
Create_Socket(address_family)
protocol not support No No
Error ??? IPv6
IPv6_ ONLY
bind_socket
No Socket
Yes error? ? No
Listen_socket
12.Objectives new applications should be designed to work in
all environments: single IPv4, single IPv6 or
The experience we earned from our effort shows that transitionmixed communication when group
applications to IPv6 will say communications management iscollaborative applications are considered. The
isolated from the rest of the application ,while for many clientprincipal building block during transitioning is
and server network applications network compilation options arethe availability of dual stack. Dual stack
not dispersed all over the code , Application is independent ofmechanisms do not, by themselves, solve the
the IP addresses management , Application use only names,IPv4 and IPv6 inter working problems; other
never IP addresses to select remote node ,Code updating of newimportant building block, addresses translation,
protocol advanced features is much simpler. is required many times. Translation refers to
the direct translation of protocols, including
headers and sometimes protocol payload.
13. Conclusions Protocol translation often results in features
loss. For instance, translation of IPv6 header
The experience we earned from our effort shows that into an IPv4 header will lead to the loss of the
transition applications to IPv6 will play a crucial role to IPv6 flow label. Translation can be
adopt new internet protocol version. While for many client complemented with tunneling; which used to
and server network applications the transition issues are bridge compatible networks across
going to be straightforward. Today the Internet is incompatible ones. However, all previous
predominantly based on IPv4. However, a big effort has been solutions depend on client and server
done to set up more and more IPv6 experiments. At the applications availability. The further
present moment, there is no a single global IPv6 network on development of automatic tools is essential and
the same scale and it will take some time to get it. Therefore, will be selected in two ways : Sup transition
8. more languages other CC++JavaBasicPascalFortran etc in [20]. Yukwen Hsu, Transition an applications to
order to support for more useful programmers and becoming IPv6 Microsoft corporation Windows division.
more intelligent in helping the programmer with more issues. [21].Transition and performance aspects from IPv4
to IPv6: The case of open H323, International
Journal of communication
All these requirements can be implemented as a single Systems,6/04/2005.
library. It is a middleware network interface to isolate [22].Sun Microsystems, Transition applications to
communications from the rest of functional application the IPv6 APIs
modules. This solution simplifies future maintenance [23].Transition broadcast applications to IPv6
operations and it can be used as a general network interface (Windows).
for similar applications. This is interesting when a complete [24]. Bahrouz Forouzan Tata McGraw-Hill.,
TCP/IP Protocol suite.
environment should be ported. From the above conclusions
[25].Eva.M.Castro, Transition applications and
we have concluded that Transition is very easy for a network DNS issues ,
programmer because we will use the same socket calls and [26].Networking IPv6 user guide for JDK/JRE 5.0
few new functions. Transition makes your application ready [27].R.A. Yaiz and O. Ozturk , Mobility in IPv6
for t he currently deployed next generation internet protocol. Available from :http
Transition an application enables your application to use ://www/cuba.ipv6tf.org/pdf/mobileIPv6.pdf,Date
enhanced features of IPv6.IPv6 supports for very few accessed: 4th October 2007.
changes like either a 0 or 1% of typical network application.
Acknowledgement
Mr.Hanumanthappa.J. has taken his birth in
Harihar on 6-12-1975,which belongs to Davanagere
This research paper has been supported by Department of (D).He has received his Bachelor of Engineering
studies in Computer Science , Manasagangothri, University Degree in computer science and engineering from
of Mysore and Department of Computer Science , University B.D.T College of Engineering , Davanagere,
Mangalagangothri , Mangalore University. I would like to Karnataka( S),India( C),which is affiliated to Kuvempu
University , Shimoga in the year 1998 and Master of
thanks our beloved supervisor Dr.Manjaiah. D.H for Technology in cs& engineering from NITK Surathkal ,
providing his support and encouragement ,to conduct and Karnataka( S ), India (C) in the year 2003.He is currently
prepare this research paper on Transition of IPv4 Network pursuing his doctoral program in Mangalore university ,
applications to IPv6 Network applications[TIPv4 to TIPv6] . Mangalore under the supervision of Dr.Manjaiah.D.H. on
entitled Security and Porting issues on IPv6 .
14.References He is currently working as a LECTURER in Department of
Studies in Computer Science ,Manasagangothri, University
[1].RFC2553 - Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6 of Mysore. I have presented 2 research papers in National
and International Conferences in Network Engineering.
[2].Richard Stevens, Unix Network Programming Volume 1
Currently Iam writing two Text books on Introduction to
[3].Richard Stevens, Gary Wright, TCP/IP Illustrated Volume C and one more on Cryptography and Network security
2 for computer science and Engineering students.
[4].IETF IPv6 Transition Working Group ,
http://www.6bone.net/ngtrans. Iam a Life member of CSI, ISTE,AMIE, IAENG,
[5].I. Raicu. An Empirical Analysis of Internet Protocol version 6 Embedded networking group of TIFAC CORE in
(IPv6) , Master Thesis, Wayne State University, 2002 Network Engineering .
[6].S. Kent, R. Atkinson. Security Architecture for the Internet
Dr. Manjaiah D.H. is currently Reader and
Protocol , Request for Comments 2401, Internet
Chairman of BoS in both UG/PG in the
Engineering Task Force, November 1998 . Computer Science at Dept. of Computer
[7].S. Tanenbaum, Computer Networks, Third Edition, Prentice Hall Science, Mangalore University, Mangalore. He
Inc.,1996, pp. 686,413- 436,437-449. is also the BoE Member of all Universities of
[8].Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , IPv6 Network Programming Karnataka and other reputed universities in India. He
Elsevier digital press -2006. received PhD degree from University of Mangalore,
[9].W. Richard Stevens. Expires: October 19, 2002 Advanced M.Tech. from NITK, Surathkal and B.E., from Mysore
Sockets API for IPv6..Obsolètes RFC 2292.INTERNET-DRAFT University. Dr.Manjaiah D.H has an extensive academic,
Industry and Research experience. He has worked at
[10]Advanced Sockets API for IPv6. W. Stevens, M. Thomas.
many technical bodies like CSI, ISTE, ACS, IAENG and
February 1998. RFC2292.(Format: TXT=152077 bytes) (Status: ISOC. He has authored more than - 25 research papers in
INFORMATIONAL) international conferences and reputed journals. He is the
[11].R.Gilligan, S.,Thomson, J.Bound,W. Stevens. March 1999. recipient of the several talks for his area of interest in
RFC2553 Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6 . many public occasions. He is an expert committee member
[12]. Eva M. Castro ,Transition applications to IPv6 How To . of an AICTE and various technical bodies. He had written
[13].HP-UX IPv6 transition guide. Kannada text book, with an entitled, COMPUTER
[14].Sun s transition guide. PARICHAYA , for the benefits of all teaching and
Students Community of Karnataka. Dr .Manjaiah D.H s
[15].IPv6 network administration guide areas interest are Computer Networking & Sensor
[16].Network application transition guide Networks, Mobile Communication, Operations Research,
[17].Network application transition tool E-commerce, Internet Technology and Web
[18]. Transition applications to IPv6 , Pervasive technology labs Programming.
at Indiana University.
[19]. Transition an application to IPv6 : The quake 3 example.