Intercultural Communication
• Group members
Culture
• is linked to communication and a wide range of
human experience including feelings, identity and
sense-making
• provides people with different ways of thinking,
seeing, hearing and interpreting the world
• involves a number of man-made, collective
artefacts and is shared by the members of a social
group
• is something that shapes one‘s behaviour or
structures one′s perception of the world
Culture and Communication
• Culture is often defined in interrelation to
communication:
"Culture is communication
and communication is culture.“
!
Culture is passed on
via communication and
communication reflects
one′s culture
Cultural factors
• Behaviour is not only affected by culture but also
by other factors such as
– organizational norms
– education
– age
– social class
• each of these factors can be understood and
manifested in a cultural context
!
while communicating we
use different cultural habits
and meaning systems
Intercultural Communication
• is a research field that studies how people from
different cultural backgrounds communicate with
each other
• is an instrument which transmits a certain
meaning, composes and reinforces identity and
expresses feelings
• is an instrument to connect with others
Constraints for intercultural understanding
• cognitive constraints
– the frame of reference or world-view which provides a
backdrop that all new information is compared to or
inserted into
• behaviour constraints
– each culture has its own rules concerning proper
behaviour which affect verbal and nonverbal
communication
• emotional constraints
– different cultures regulate the display of emotions
differently. Some cultures get very emotional while
others try to keep their emotions hidden
low- and high-context settings
• low-context settings
– screens its direct
attention more to the
literal meanings of
words and less to the
context surrounding the
words
– we “say what we mean,
and mean what we say”
– leaves few space for
interpretation of the
explicit message
• high-context settings
– are designed to let in
implied meanings
arising from the physical
setting, relations or
shared understandings
– nonverbal signals are
used to infer, imply,
insinuate or deliver
messages that we want
to transmit indirectly
Individual Strategy
• Depending on the kind of relationship, the situation
and the purpose of communication the low- and
high-context communication, used as an individual
strategy, may be more or less explicit and direct.
!
Low- and high-context
communication are not only
individual strategies, but may
be used to understand
cultural groups
Low- and high-context-culture
• Low-context-culture
– values the individualist’s
goals
– separates person and issue
– is confrontational
– uses logic-deductive thinking
and explicit codes of speech
– expresses emotional
information through facial
expressions, tone of voice
and body movements
– individualist cultures tend to
gravitate towards low-context
starting points
• High-context-culture
– values the collectivist’s
goals
– merges person and issue
– relies on contextual cues
and situational knowledge
– uses implicit references
and indirect speech
– masks its emotions
– collectivist cultures tend to
use high-context
communication
Situational Factors
• most people use a mixture of low- and high-
context-communication
• even in the most direct, low-context setting, implicit
meanings will be conveyed
• there are 3 factors that could affect the choice of
direct or indirect communication in intercultural
workplaces
– cultural identity
– work status
– time urgency
Cultural Identity: Third Culture
• intercultural communication takes place in a “third
culture”
• Part of “third culture” dynamics is the
establishment of common communication rules
• People take into account
– the demand of situational characteristics
– the cultural identity of the other person
– the existence of shared intercultural norms
that are not necessarily the same as one's home
culture.
low-context communicators interacting
with high-context communicators
should be mindful that
• building a good relationship can contribute to
effectiveness over time and nonverbal messages
and gestures may be as important as what is said
• status and identity may be communicated
nonverbally and require appropriate
acknowledgement
• face-saving and tact may be important and need to
be balanced with the desire to communicate fully
and frankly
high-context communicators interacting
with low-context communicators
should be mindful that
• things can be taken at face value rather than as
representative of layers of meaning
• roles and functions may be decoupled from status
and identity
• efficiency and effectiveness may be served by a
sustained focus on tasks
• direct questions and observations are not
necessarily meant to offend, but to clarify and
advance shared goals
• indirect cues may not be enough to get the
attention
Work status
• Individualists
– don’t alter their
behaviour according to
status
– value low power
distance resulting in a
more egalitarian
approach
• Collectivists
– use more
confrontational
techniques when power
and status increase
– tend to value high
power distance or the
unequal distribution of
power
How to communicate effective
• Desire
– to communicate
– to connect with other humans
– to be proactive when approaching a new culture
• Knowledge
– knowing about other cultures will help to develop skills
and to act in a way that respects these preferences
• Stereotypes
– reach beyond stereotypes
Conclusion
• Intercultural competence means understanding
what culture is and how it works
• Culture is not congenital, but adapted and modified
by the individual’s personality
• The knowledge about cultural concepts are useful
to compare cultures that are relatively closed
• The various levels of culture show that culture can
be seen as an onion-like construct
• Cultural understanding is a journey, that never
finishes, because the process and the endpoints
change constantly
Bibliography
• Adler, N.J., 1997, International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, New York, Wadsworth
Publishing
• Hall, E.T./ Red Hall, M., 2000, Understanding Culture Differences, Intercultural Press Inc.,U.S
• Hall, E.T./ 1959, The silent language, New York, Double Day
• Hofstede G., 2006, Lokales Denken, globales Handlen, interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales
Mangement, Berlin, DTV-Beck
• Hofstede G., 1980: Culture‘s consequences: international differences in work-related. Beverly Hills,
Sage Publications
• Hofstede G., 1994, Cultures and Organizations: software of the mind: intercultural. London
HarperCollins
• Maletzke, G., 1996, Interkulturelle Kommunikation: zur Interaktion zwischen Menschen, Opladen.
Westdeutscher
• Ting-Toomey, S., 1999, Communication Across Cultures (Guilford Communication Series) Guilford
Publications
• Learning Menu developed by Leonardo Project MENS available at
www.idec.gr./mens

Intercultural communication

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Culture • is linkedto communication and a wide range of human experience including feelings, identity and sense-making • provides people with different ways of thinking, seeing, hearing and interpreting the world • involves a number of man-made, collective artefacts and is shared by the members of a social group • is something that shapes one‘s behaviour or structures one′s perception of the world
  • 4.
    Culture and Communication •Culture is often defined in interrelation to communication: "Culture is communication and communication is culture.“ ! Culture is passed on via communication and communication reflects one′s culture
  • 5.
    Cultural factors • Behaviouris not only affected by culture but also by other factors such as – organizational norms – education – age – social class • each of these factors can be understood and manifested in a cultural context ! while communicating we use different cultural habits and meaning systems
  • 6.
    Intercultural Communication • isa research field that studies how people from different cultural backgrounds communicate with each other • is an instrument which transmits a certain meaning, composes and reinforces identity and expresses feelings • is an instrument to connect with others
  • 7.
    Constraints for interculturalunderstanding • cognitive constraints – the frame of reference or world-view which provides a backdrop that all new information is compared to or inserted into • behaviour constraints – each culture has its own rules concerning proper behaviour which affect verbal and nonverbal communication • emotional constraints – different cultures regulate the display of emotions differently. Some cultures get very emotional while others try to keep their emotions hidden
  • 8.
    low- and high-contextsettings • low-context settings – screens its direct attention more to the literal meanings of words and less to the context surrounding the words – we “say what we mean, and mean what we say” – leaves few space for interpretation of the explicit message • high-context settings – are designed to let in implied meanings arising from the physical setting, relations or shared understandings – nonverbal signals are used to infer, imply, insinuate or deliver messages that we want to transmit indirectly
  • 9.
    Individual Strategy • Dependingon the kind of relationship, the situation and the purpose of communication the low- and high-context communication, used as an individual strategy, may be more or less explicit and direct. ! Low- and high-context communication are not only individual strategies, but may be used to understand cultural groups
  • 10.
    Low- and high-context-culture •Low-context-culture – values the individualist’s goals – separates person and issue – is confrontational – uses logic-deductive thinking and explicit codes of speech – expresses emotional information through facial expressions, tone of voice and body movements – individualist cultures tend to gravitate towards low-context starting points • High-context-culture – values the collectivist’s goals – merges person and issue – relies on contextual cues and situational knowledge – uses implicit references and indirect speech – masks its emotions – collectivist cultures tend to use high-context communication
  • 11.
    Situational Factors • mostpeople use a mixture of low- and high- context-communication • even in the most direct, low-context setting, implicit meanings will be conveyed • there are 3 factors that could affect the choice of direct or indirect communication in intercultural workplaces – cultural identity – work status – time urgency
  • 12.
    Cultural Identity: ThirdCulture • intercultural communication takes place in a “third culture” • Part of “third culture” dynamics is the establishment of common communication rules • People take into account – the demand of situational characteristics – the cultural identity of the other person – the existence of shared intercultural norms that are not necessarily the same as one's home culture.
  • 13.
    low-context communicators interacting withhigh-context communicators should be mindful that • building a good relationship can contribute to effectiveness over time and nonverbal messages and gestures may be as important as what is said • status and identity may be communicated nonverbally and require appropriate acknowledgement • face-saving and tact may be important and need to be balanced with the desire to communicate fully and frankly
  • 14.
    high-context communicators interacting withlow-context communicators should be mindful that • things can be taken at face value rather than as representative of layers of meaning • roles and functions may be decoupled from status and identity • efficiency and effectiveness may be served by a sustained focus on tasks • direct questions and observations are not necessarily meant to offend, but to clarify and advance shared goals • indirect cues may not be enough to get the attention
  • 15.
    Work status • Individualists –don’t alter their behaviour according to status – value low power distance resulting in a more egalitarian approach • Collectivists – use more confrontational techniques when power and status increase – tend to value high power distance or the unequal distribution of power
  • 16.
    How to communicateeffective • Desire – to communicate – to connect with other humans – to be proactive when approaching a new culture • Knowledge – knowing about other cultures will help to develop skills and to act in a way that respects these preferences • Stereotypes – reach beyond stereotypes
  • 17.
    Conclusion • Intercultural competencemeans understanding what culture is and how it works • Culture is not congenital, but adapted and modified by the individual’s personality • The knowledge about cultural concepts are useful to compare cultures that are relatively closed • The various levels of culture show that culture can be seen as an onion-like construct • Cultural understanding is a journey, that never finishes, because the process and the endpoints change constantly
  • 18.
    Bibliography • Adler, N.J.,1997, International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, New York, Wadsworth Publishing • Hall, E.T./ Red Hall, M., 2000, Understanding Culture Differences, Intercultural Press Inc.,U.S • Hall, E.T./ 1959, The silent language, New York, Double Day • Hofstede G., 2006, Lokales Denken, globales Handlen, interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Mangement, Berlin, DTV-Beck • Hofstede G., 1980: Culture‘s consequences: international differences in work-related. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications • Hofstede G., 1994, Cultures and Organizations: software of the mind: intercultural. London HarperCollins • Maletzke, G., 1996, Interkulturelle Kommunikation: zur Interaktion zwischen Menschen, Opladen. Westdeutscher • Ting-Toomey, S., 1999, Communication Across Cultures (Guilford Communication Series) Guilford Publications • Learning Menu developed by Leonardo Project MENS available at www.idec.gr./mens