Uploaded byTamer Hamdy
Steps for successfully submitting your scientific article
1) The document provides steps for successfully submitting a scientific article, including targeting the right journal, writing the manuscript, internal reviewing, and dealing with the publication process. 2) It emphasizes writing clearly and following the target journal's format instructions. Tools for writing like online paraphrasing and synonym tools are recommended. 3) The internal review process is described, which involves checking that the research fits the journal's scope and quality standards. Reviewers should provide feedback to improve the manuscript.
More Related Content
Similar to Steps for successfully submitting your scientific article
Steps for successfully submitting your scientific article
- 1. Steps for Successfully Dr.TamerHamdy 2018 Submitting your Scientific Article الرحيم الرحمن هللا بسم
- 2. Types of researchitems
- 3. Capsule creation Weneed it to be … Helpful Summarized Interconnected Attractive
- 4. PracticallyIdeally 1. To getpromoted 2. To get a job 3. To keep your job! 4. To get funding To share research findings & discoveries with the hope of improving some things
- 5.
- 7.
- 8. Number of timespublication is cited by other publications Citation count Number of publications produced by individual Publication count
- 9. Gorge Hirsch Quantity Quality # ofPapers # of Citations
- 10.
- 12. If you havean h-index of 4, that means you have 4 papers with at least 4 citations
- 13.
- 14. Steps for successfully submittingyour scientific article Target journal Writing Internal reviewing Publication
- 15. What happens afterI’ve submitted my manuscript? 1 2 3 Editor Editor sends paper out to reviewers Reviewers communicate with editor who communicates with you
- 16. Single Blind PeerReview1 Double Blind Peer Review2 Post-Publication Peer Review4 Common types of peer review 3 Open Peer Review
- 19. Publication Process • Targetjournal selection Pre-writing: Step 1 • Follow Guidelines • Format The Manuscript • Writings Writings: Step 2 Publishing: Step 3 • Peer Review Process
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26. Target journal Journal Indexing InternationalSociety of Indexing Web of Science
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30. Indexing Criteria •Timeliness ofpublication: Late or short publication •Quality of peer review: A journal must have a strong peer review system •Distinctiveness of subject area: A journal must have a distinctive aims and scope Thomson Reuters Unnecessary addition •Internationality: Authors & editorial board. •Number of citations: Journals are often rejected because of low citation levels in their category
- 32. Using the ImpactFactor alone to judge a journal is like Using weight alone to judge a person’s health
- 33.
- 34. SNIP (Source Normalized Impactper Paper)
- 35.
- 37.
- 38. International Scientific Indexing(ISI) Server provides indexing of major international journals
- 39. International Standard SerialNumber (ISSN) For Electronic Journals
- 40. Digital Object Identifier(DOI) For Articles
- 41.
- 42. Citation Based Metrics •Thomson Reuters Web of Science – Journal Impact Factor (JIF) • Elsevier Scopus – Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) • Scimago SCIMAGOJR – SCImago Journal Rank Indicator (SJR)
- 43. Citation Based Metrics •Thomson Reuters Web of Science https://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com/JCRJournalHo meAction.action
- 44. • Thomson Reuters Web of Science
- 46. Citation Based Metrics •Elsevier Scopus https://www.scopus.com/sources
- 47. • Elsevier Scopus
- 48. • Elsevier Scopus Q Q
- 49. • Elsevier Scopus Q
- 50. Citation Based Metrics •Scimago SCIMAGOJR http://www.scimagojr.com/
- 51. • Scimago SCIMAGOJR Q
- 52. • Scimago SCIMAGOJR Q Q
- 53. • Similar nameto popular journals • Poor homepage of their website • Very wide & different journal scope • Plagiarism • Uneven articles quality • Incorrect impact factor • Not indexed in scientific database as Scopus & ISI
- 54. Journal finder management OnlinetoolsJournal Guide https://www.journalguide.com
- 55.
- 56.
- 57.
- 58.
- 62. Follow precisely theformat instructions of your target journal
- 63. Make sure yourarticle has a solid storyline and is written in good English Writing
- 64. Tools for writing Synonyms Grammar Onlinetools Paraphrasing Plagiarism
- 65. Tools for writing Onlinetools Paraphrasing http://www.paraphrasing-tool.com http://www.youparaphrase.com
- 66. Tools for writing Onlinetools Synonyms http://www.synonym.com/synonyms/tool
- 67. Tools for writing Onlinetools Grammar http://www.grammarcheckforsentence.com https://www.grammarly.com http://www.reverso.net/
- 68. Tools for writing Onlinetools Plagiarism http://www.plagiarismchecker.com http://plagiarisma.net https://www.quetext.com https://noplag.com/plagiarism-checker
- 69.
- 71. 1. Meets thequality standards 2. Falls under the scope of the journal Is the research work presented in the manuscript: Reading the cover letter & manuscript
- 75. The manuscript fitsinto the mission of the journal
- 76. Title Should be clear,attractive & indicative
- 77. Is the titleclear, attractive & indicative ? From10 to 15 words long Clearly identify the purpose of the study
- 78.
- 79. The abstract accuratelyreflects the content Should describe your entire study at a glance Abstract
- 80. • Provide sufficientbackground about your work • Mention the research question or problem Introduction
- 81. Should include detailsof all experiments conducted Methods
- 82. Should answer thequestion that stated in the introduction Results & discussion
- 84. If you asthe reviewer can't interpret the author's findings …… Requests for clarification & explanation are entirely suitable during the review process
- 85. Should include yourown findings Conclusion
- 86. Should list everysource References
- 87.
- 88. Reference ManagementTool
- 89. The language, grammar& syntax acceptable
- 90. Reacting to reviewers’comments
- 92.
- 93. Rejected The journal willpublish the paper in its original form The journal will publish the paper & asks the author to make small corrections The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes Accept after major revisions Accepted The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes The journal will not publish the paper Revise & resubmit Accept with minor revisions Final Decision
- 94. References 1. Sandercock PML.How to write and publish a scientific article. J Can Soc Forensic Sci. 2012;45(1):1-5. 2. Chyun DA, Henly SJ. New scholars writing for publication. Nurs Res. 2015;64(4):231-234.
- 95.
Editor's Notes
- #3 انواع المواد البحثية Article = مقاله جزء قائم بذاته من عمل بحثي أكبر
- #4 كتابة الارتيكل زي اللى بيصمم كبسولة دواء لازم تبقى مفيدة و ملخصه و صغيرة و متصممه بشكل محكم و مخرجة بشكل مناسب عشان تعالج مشكلة محددة تعالوا نسأل بعض شوية اسأله و نجاوب عليها ....؟؟
- #7 الإستشهاد علمي
- #8 H-index مقياس جودة الإنتاج takes into account two things: 1. The researcher’s PRODUCTIVITY (number of publications a researcher has produced) 2. The IMPACT of that researcher’s publications (how many citations the researcher’s publications have received)
- #10 Hirsch combine the idea of quantity number of publications and quality number of citations in a One number
- #14 معامل التأثير
- #15 Target journal Writing Internal reviewing and polishing of an article
- #16 Author المؤلف – Corresponding Author المؤلف المسؤول Editor محرر Reviewer محكم
- #17 التحكيم النزيه (الشريف)
- #21 و أنا بادور على Full article ممكن الاقي Creative Commons (CC) licenses المشاع الابداعي You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute , Under the following terms: Attribution provide a link to the license, for non commercial purpose, without modifications.
- #25 مصادر القياس الشهرة و الإنتشار Social media: Facebook, Tweeter Multimedia : YouTube, Slide share مواقع علمية متخصصة لوضع الإنتاج العلمي Thomson Reuters, Scopus PubMed, Orcid, Mendeley
- #26 Crossref: For citation data & DOI registration
- #27 قاعدة بيانات بشروط محددة
- #35 SNIP: Impact/citation potential Citation potential: Average number of references to any 3 years old papers
- #37 SNIP: Impact/citation potential Citation potential: Average number of references to any 3 years old papers
- #38 SJR: Scopus citation data divided by number of articles published by journal over 3 years
- #39 - The ISI server provides indexing of major international journals and proceedings
- #40 The ISSN is the international standardized code which identifies all serials of journals الرقم التسلسلى المعيارى الدولي للدوريات الالكترونية
- #41 معرّف الوثيقة الرقمي doi is a combination of letters and numbers assigned to a journal article found online A permanent identifier given to a Web file
- #55 Discover journals that have already published articles on similar topics, by matching journals to a paper’s content
- #56 Discover journals that have already published articles on similar topics, by matching journals to a paper’s content
- #57 Do not Copy
- #58 (It is very important to say) Writing should be done in your own word = Paraphrasing ideas Do not repeat, but paraphrasing
- #59 Be original , do not copy, do not plagiarize مكاتب الاقتباس العلميى فى المركز القومي للبحوث و اكاديمية البحث العملى و المجلس الاعلى للجامعات
- #61 You must follow author guidelines Data about all thing as: data about journal, type of research, indexing, processing charges
- #63 Follow accuratly the format instructions of writing
- #64 القصة مترابطة و كل فقرة بتؤدى الى اللى بعدها بلغة سليمة و باختصار دون اطاله
- #65 Paraphrasing, synonyms, grammar & plagiarism
- #66 Synonyms, paraphrasing, grammar
- #67 Synonyms, paraphrasing, grammar
- #69 طبعا فيه مكتب الاقتباس سواء فى المركز او فى اكاديمية البحث العلمي او جامعه القاهرة فى كلية الحاسبات و المعلومات
- #70 Internal reviewing & polishing of an article. >> among colleagues before submitting it to a journal. Authors may believe that a reviewer, appointed by the journal, will see the excellence of their research
- #74 Every reviewer have a checklist
- #76 Manuscript should fits into the mission of the journal It is essential to check the “Information for Authors” section of your target journal to determine the journal’s restrictions
- #77 Title should be clear, attractive & indicative
- #78 clear, attractive & indicative
- #80 The abstract should be accurately reflects the entire content
- #81 The introduction should Provide sufficient background about your work & Mention the research question or problem
- #82 Methods should include details of all experiments conducted
- #83 In results & discussion section It should answer the question that stated in the introduction
- #86 Conclusion: Should include your own findings
- #87 You should list every source of data cited in your manuscript in the references section
- #90 The language, grammar & syntax should be correct (acceptable)
- #92 Finally the peer reviewer will evaluate the manuscript and scoring it; ranging from poor to excellent
- #93 The peer reviewer write the general comments about the manuscript, which may be; rejected or accepted without any changes or with minor or major changes
- #94 1. accept without any changes (acceptance): the journal will publish the paper in its original form 2. accept with minor revisions (acceptance): the journal will publish the paper and asks the author to make small corrections 3. accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance ): the journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors 4. revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): the journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes 5. reject the paper (outright rejection): the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the authors make major revisions